Additive manufacturing machines which are also commonly known as 3D printers have grown very popular following the vision successfully put forward by the RepRap foundation that because they can replicate themselves we will be able to have a machine at a minimal cost. In the future this could mean that more of us are able to make the shift from consumer to being self sufficient or even become producers. If the majority of people had this home manufacturing technology it would also enable innovators and designers to sell products to a global audience from their desktops. So far the uptake of the technology has so been very limited to enthusiasts and businesses. If interest is not to want then we need to address some of the reasons so that the machines move from the niche to the mass market.
One factor that is limiting the uptake by consumers is that we do not generally consume adequate quantities of non food manufactured product to justify the cost and space that are needed for a 3D printer. The other two most significant factor is that 3D printers are not currently capable of producing products that can compete with the cost and sophistication of mass produced items and that they are relatively very slow.
Some aspects of this invention address the first problem by defining machines with healthy food preparation functionality that users use would want to use every day or which only take up space and time that we do not need.
Other aspects of this invention address the cost and functionality issue by enabling the production of more sophisticated products. This aspect also saves cost and reduces pollution by enabling the reuse of non printable components such as actuators and screens and electronics.
Currently this is limited because the majority of additive and subtractive manufacturing machines are limited to one utilizing one tool at a time. Other more sophisticated machines which have multiple tools still tend to have them mounted on a single positioning system in a given work area. More recently machines have been introduced which have a rotating build surface and manufacturers including ourselves have said that they would introduce multiple heads on radial track that could print with different materials at the same time. One problem with this design is that centrifugal force would limit its speed. Another problem would be that where the printed object or an element within it needed to be printed to one side of the centre of rotation then the strand of material would either need to be stopped and restarted on every rotation or the bed would need to rotate back and forth. In the latter case this would negatively impact any other print head that were operating at the same time.
One aspect of this invention describes a positioning system that is also capable of enabling a multiplicity of tools and pick or pick and place mechanisms to be concurrently and independently moved around a common working volume without the disadvantages of the rotary positioning solution.
According to one embodiment of this invention a multiplicity of carriages are constrained between two mostly or exactly parallel surfaces in such a way that they can only move in a single plane. Each of the carriages is magnetically coupled to a tool or tool carrier positioned either below the lower surface or above the upper one depending on whether the product being printed and assembled is suspended above or sitting below the surfaces.
In a preferred arrangement of this invention the two surfaces would be made from or coated with an electrically conductive material so that they could be electrified to supply the carriages with power ether through their wheels or a separate electrical pick up.
In a preferred arrangement of this invention the two surfaces would incorporate a capacitive positioning system so that the machine would be able to calculate the position and orientation of each carnage.
According to one embodiment of this invention the carriages are mounted on a multiplicity of omni-directional wheels or swiveling castors that run along the two opposing surface between which the carriage is located. When one or more of the wheels are driven the carriage moves and drags the tools or toolheads to which it is coupled with it.
In a preferred arrangement of this invention one surface has three omni-directional wheels running along it. To reduce part count and costs there in just a single omni-directional wheel or castor or ball running invent the other surface.
In another arrangement of this invention one surface has parallel equidistant grooves running along it in one direction and the opposing surface has parallel equidistant grooves running along it in a perpendicular direction. Each carriage has castellated wheels that allow them to roll in one the grooves on one surface but be pushed sideways in the grooves on the opposing surface. Rather than just relying on friction the carriages are now held in position by the wheels interlocking with the grooves allowing for greater forces to be applied to the tool and tool holders.
In another arrangement of this invention the tool or tool carrier is both held onto and driven along a single surface in two perpendicular directions by fluctuating magnetic fields that it generates using electromagnets mounted on the carrier. These interact with fields created by permanent or electromagnets fixed on or in the surface.
In another arrangement of this invention, the tool or tool carrier is both held onto and driven along a single surface in two perpendicular directions by fluctuating magnetic fields generated by electromagnets mounted on or in the surface that interact with fields generated by permanent or electromagnets on the carriage.
In one arrangement of this invention the proximity of the tools and product being constructed would be changed by moving the bed or clamp holding the product which is being produced by the machine closer to or further away.
In another arrangement of this invention the proximity of the tools and product being constructed would be changed by moving the surface holding the tools.
In another arrangement of this invention the proximity of the tools and product being constructed would be changed by changing the individual lengths of the tools or tool holders themselves.
In one arrangement of this invention the component or material holders would hold their own supply of components or material.
In another arrangement of this invention the component or material holders would have a supply of components or material fed to them via a tube or conveyor.
Advantageously to save space both the mechanism holding the carriages and the product being built and the dispensers for tools and materials and components should be able to be folded away when not in use. This would allow products to be printed and assembled in the night by a large machine which would otherwise intrude into required living space that is needed in the day.
According to another aspect of this invention a machine comprises of a multiplicity of material deposition or component pick and place mechanisms that each travel along shafts over a multiplicity of rotating build platforms.
Advantageously to simplify the arrangement of the machine there would be a single rotating build platform or jig and the shafts along which the mechanisms travel would radiate outward from the axis of rotation.
Advantageously to reduce the material and cost of the shafts and supporting framework the shafts and any required supporting members would be arranged like the spokes within a bicycle wheel and tensioned accordingly.
In a preferred arrangement of the machine to minimise the space required by the machine there would be two such wheels located one above the other along a common axis. Carriages supporting the material deposition or component pick and place mechanisms would also incorporate a shaft with toothed pulleys or cogs at either end. These pulleys or cogs would mesh with toothed belts or racks or chains fitted to both the lower and upper guide shafts. As the carriage would then be held in position at both its top and bottom this would minimise any tendency for it to twist when forces are applied to the tool or component holding mechanisms.
The following aspects of this invention apply to 3D printers using the described above as well as machines with Cartesian and rotary material deposition and component placement positioning systems. It is acknowledged that prior art exists for both Cartesian and rotary format printers so novelty is only claimed for the peripheral mechanisms described.
According to one aspect of this invention there are a multiplicity of tools or components or interchangeable material dispensing tanks or reels or loose materials stored so that they could be automatically picked up and released from tool or component or material dispensing holders as required.
In a preferred arrangement of this invention the tool or component or material storage would comprise of pigeonholes or jigs of different sizes located at the edges of the print bed. The tools or components or material holders would be sized to accurately fit the pigeonholes so that they could be pulled out by an actuator on a travelling carriage so that they could be relocated and optionally further processed and placed into a product.
In a preferred arrangement of this invention this storage unit would move vertically so that the required item is aligned with the pick up carriage.
Alternatively if the storage unit is static then it would need to be located sufficiently high above the final built product to ensure that all of the items required for a build could be accessed during it.
Advantageously the same storage mechanisms would receive empty or part used material dispensing tanks or reels for refilling from a larger fixed container of material or components.
According to one aspect of this invention a multiplicity of the pick and place mechanisms would be motorized robots each with a multiplicity of axis.
According to another aspect of this invention the carriages that carry the tools or components or materials would incorporate lower cost non motorised pick and place mechanisms that would be cam driven so that it could reach horizontally in the plane in which it is travelling to pick up a component and re-orientate the component to enable it to be best placed onto or into the product being made.
According to another aspect of this invention there is a tool that dispenses loops of material onto or into a product to add tensile strength to the printed parts.
In a preferred arrangement of the loop dispenser the loops are cut from a tube of material.
Advantageously the tube of material would preferably be formed by winding layers in a circular path so that there is minimal cutting through the strands of the material when cutting off the loops.
According to another aspect of this invention there are a multiplicity of food storage and preparation tools incorporated into the machine,
Advantageously in the case of the machine with material deposition and component placement carriages that are magnetically coupled to the motor driven carriages on the other side of a sheet of material this food preparation equipment would segregate and protect the driven carriages and their components from water and other fluids that might be used to clean this equipment and preparation area.
Advantageously the lower surface would be made out of gorilla glass or another abrasion resistant material so that it did not get significantly scratched or eroded by abrasive cleaning agents.
Food ingredients or components or material storage containers or loose materials would either be pulled or pushed horizontally out of the storage containers or be gravity fed into material deposition or component placement carriages which would transport them to a location for further processing or deposit them into or onto a container.
Advantageously some or all of the means to preprocess ingredients or materials or components such as moving blades or wash jets or graters would either be mounted on the output aperture of the storage container or on the carriage.
Advantageously the means to cut or grate food ingredients would comprise of a rotary disc with quadrants equipped with differently shaped blades and apertures. This would enable a single blade which be spun backward and forwards so that a single blade could be used to carry out different operations without a tool change.
Advantageously the rotary blade would have one quadrant without any apertures that can be used to seal off the aperture between the storage container to enable the build and cutting area to be washed.
This invention will now be illustrated by means of ten figures.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1417118.5 | Sep 2014 | GB | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/GB2015/000265 | 9/11/2015 | WO | 00 |