Federated digital rights management scheme including trusted systems

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10878065
  • Patent Number
    10,878,065
  • Date Filed
    Monday, October 23, 2017
    7 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, December 29, 2020
    4 years ago
Abstract
Federated systems for issuing playback certifications granting access to technically protected content are described. One embodiment of the system includes a registration server connected to a network, a content server connected to the network and to a trusted system, a first device including a non-volatile memory that is connected to the network and a second device including a non-volatile memory that is connected to the network. In addition, the registration server is configured to provide the first device with a first set of activation information in a first format, the first device is configured to store the first set of activation information in non-volatile memory, the registration server is configured to provide the second device with a second set of activation information in a second format, and the second device is configured to store the second set of activation information in non-volatile memory.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates generally to digital rights management schemes and more specifically to playback certification schemes where various playback activities are enabled in a coordinated fashion by different entities within the system.


Providers of multimedia content can digitize content for distribution via digital communication networks. An important issue faced by a content distribution system is enabling only those customers that have purchased the content to play the content and compartmentalize access to all the stakeholders in the content distribution chain. One approach is to encrypt portions of the content and to issue encryption keys to authorized users that enable encrypted portions of the content to be unencrypted. Layers of keys and protection policies can be used so a single encryption key alone is insufficient for the user to access the content. In a number of systems, users purchase players that possess specified decryption capabilities. Content providers can distribute content to user's owning such a player in an encryption format supported by the player. Complying with a specified protection policy typically involves using an encryption key specified by the manufacturer of the players. In many instances the manufacturer of the players will not reveal the encryption keys used in the specified encryption scheme and likewise the content provider does not want to share the content keys to the manufacturer of the players.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Systems and methods are described for issuing content to devices possessing various playback, decryption and communication capabilities. In a number of embodiments, the variation in the capabilities of devices are supported by providing processes for registering a device to receive content, playing back content on a device and revoking a device's registration that differ in response to the capabilities of different classes of device. Many embodiments of the invention include a single entity for registering devices. The registration entity is configured to register each different class of device. In several embodiments, the registration entity also distributes trusted systems to content providers. The trusted systems enable content providers to issue content with playback certificates. The playback certificates determine the playback capabilities that specific users have with respect to the content and can include at least one piece of information encrypted using an encryption key known only to the content provider. An aspect of many embodiments of the invention is the ability of content providers to issue playback certifications without needing to exchange information with a central registration service.


In many embodiments of the invention there is a central registration device and multiple distributed content services. As part of the registration process, there is a one time sharing of data between the registration service and the content services. In addition, content services can issue secure transactions without needing to contact the central registration service.


One embodiment of the invention includes a registration server connected to a network, a content server connected to the network and to a trusted system, a first device including a non-volatile memory that is connected to the network, and a second device including a non-volatile memory that is connected to the network. In addition, the registration server is configured to provide the first device with a first set of activation information in a first format, the first device is configured to store the first set of activation information in non-volatile memory, the registration server is configured to provide the second device with a second set of activation information in a second format, and the second device is configured to store the second set of activation information in non-volatile memory.


In a further embodiment of the invention, the first and second devices are configured to request content from the content server, the content server is configured to issue technically protected content including multiple playback certifications, and the first device is configured to use the first set of activation information and one of the playback certifications to access the technically protected content.


In another embodiment of the invention, the second device is configured to use the second set of activation information and another of the playback certifications to access the technically protected content.


In a still further embodiment, the first set of activation information is protected by a base encryption key and includes a user encryption key and a random value, the playback certification includes information encrypted using the base encryption key, and the playback certification includes information encrypted using the user encryption key.


In still another embodiment, the information encrypted using the base encryption key and the user encryption key enables playback of the technically protected content.


In a yet further embodiment, the second set of activation information includes the same base encryption key and a different user encryption key.


In yet another embodiment, the second set of activation information includes a different base encryption key and a different user encryption key.


In a further embodiment again, the content server is configured to provide a set of content encryption keys and information concerning the device requesting content to the trusted system, and the trusted system is configured to generate the multiple playback certifications.


In another embodiment again, the registration server is configured to revoke the base encryption key.


In a further additional embodiment, the registration server is configured to revoke the user encryption key.


Another additional embodiment includes, a processor, a storage device connected to the processor, and a network interface device connected to the processor and configured to connect to a network. In addition, the processor is configured to receive registration requests via the network interface device, the processor is configured to generate activation information for transmission via the network interface device, the processor is configured to receive activation confirmations via the network interface device, and the processor is configured to record the completed activation of the device in the storage device.


In a still yet further embodiment, the activation information includes a base encryption key and a user encryption key.


In another still yet further embodiment, the processor is configured to scramble at least some of the activation information.


In a still further embodiment again, the processor is configured to generate multiple base encryption keys and multiple user encryption keys, the activation information includes the multiple base encryption keys and a single user encryption key and information concerning an active base encryption key, the processor is configured to store the multiple base encryption keys and the multiple user encryption keys in the storage device, and the processor is configured to store information indicative of the active base encryption key and the user encryption key included in the activation information in the storage device.


In still another embodiment again, the processor is configured to authenticate the activation confirmation using the activation information.


A still further additional embodiment includes, a processor, a storage device connected to the processor and including stored content, a trusted and opaque system connected to the processor, and a network interface device connected to the processor and configured to be connected to a network. In addition, the processor is configured to receive requests to provide the stored content via the network interface device, the processor is configured to generate encryption keys and encrypt the stored content, the processor is configured to provide information indicative of the request and the encryption keys to the trusted system, the trusted system is configured to provide a playback certification containing at least one encrypted copy of the encryption keys used to encrypt the stored content, and the processor is configured to transmit the encrypted content and the playback certification via the network interface device.


In a yet further embodiment again, the playback certification includes multiple copies of at least one of the encryption keys and each copy is encrypted using a different encryption key.


In yet another embodiment again, the trusted system is configured to provide multiple playback certifications, each playback certification includes at least one encrypted copy of the encryption keys, and each playback certification is formatted differently.


A yet further additional embodiment includes a processor housed within a tamper proof housing, and a communication interface connected to the processor. In addition, the processor is configured to receive requests to generate playback certifications, and each request includes at least one content encryption key and information identifying a user, the trusted system is configured to encrypt the content encryption key using an encryption key associated with the user, and the processor is configured to transmit the playback certification via the communication interface.


In yet another additional embodiment, the processor is configured to generate multiple playback certifications, each playback certification includes information encrypted using a different base encryption key, and each playback certification is formatted differently.


A further additional embodiment again includes a processor, a network interface device connected to the processor and configured to be connected to a network, and a non-volatile memory connected to the processor. In addition, the processor is configured to transmit a registration request via the network interface device, the processor is configured to receive an activation record via the network interface device, the processor is configured to extract activation information from the activation record, the processor is configured to generate an activation confirmation using the activation information, the processor is configured to transmit the activation confirmation via the network interface device, and the processor is configured to store at least some of the activation information in the non-volatile memory.


In another additional embodiment again, the activation information includes a base encryption key and a user encryption key.


In another further embodiment, the activation information includes multiple base encryption keys.


In still another further embodiment, the activation information is scrambled, and the processor is configured to perform processes to descramble the activation information.


An embodiment of the method of the invention includes sending a registration request including identifying information, receiving an activation record, extracting activation information from the activation record, generating an activation confirmation from the extracted activation information, and sending the activation confirmation.


In a further embodiment of the method of the invention, sending a registration request including identification information further includes transmitting the telephone number of a mobile phone to a registration server.


In another embodiment of the method of the invention, extracting activation information from an activation record further includes decrypting information within the activation record and descrambling decrypted information in accordance with a predetermined sequence of processes.


In a still further embodiment of the method of the invention, the activation information includes a base encryption key and a user encryption key and a random value.


In still another embodiment of the method of the invention, the activation information includes multiple base encryption keys.


A yet further embodiment of the method of the invention includes receiving a content key from content provider, receiving playback parameters from a content provider, locating a user key and a base key associated with a device, encrypting the playback parameters using the base key, encrypting the content key using the user key, and providing a playback certification including the encrypted playback parameters and the encrypted content key.


Yet another embodiment of the method of the invention also includes locating multiple user keys and multiple base keys associated with a device, forming a playback parameters table, where each entry in the table includes the playback parameters encrypted using a different base key, forming a content key table, where each entry in the table includes a copy of the content key encrypted using a different user key and providing a playback certification including the playback parameters table and the content key table.


A further embodiment again of the method of the invention includes generating a deregistration request using activation information known to a server and a device, transmitting the deregistration request to the server, and receiving acknowledgement of the deregistration request.


Another embodiment again of the method of the invention includes generating multiple domain keys associated with a particular class of device, providing each of the domain keys to each device in the class of device, storing the multiple domain keys on a registration server, using each of the multiple domain keys to encrypt information to generate a playback certification, which enables each device in the class of device to access technically protected content, deleting one of the stored multiple domain keys, and using the remaining multiple domain keys to encrypt information to generate a playback certification.


A further additional embodiment of the invention includes generating multiple user keys associated with a particular device, storing the multiple user keys on a registration server, providing one of the user keys to the device, using each of the multiple user keys to encrypt information to generate a playback certification, which enables the device to access technically protected content, deleting one of the stored user keys, providing another of the user keys to the device, and using each of the remaining multiple user keys to encrypt information to generate a playback certification.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram showing a federated system in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 2 is a flow chart showing a process for viewing a specific piece of content in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 2A is a flow chart showing a process for registering a device capable of communicating with a registration server.



FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of a consumer electronics device including ROM and non-volatile memory in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram of a registration server in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 5 is a schematic diagram of a content distribution system connected to a trusted system in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 6 is a flow diagram showing a process for encrypting content in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 7 is a schematic diagram showing an exchange of messages between a content server and a trusted system in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 8 is a flow chart showing a process for play back of technically protected content in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.



FIGS. 9A-9D are schematic representations of a playback certification showing portions of the playback certification that are encrypted at various stages during decryption of the playback certification in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.



FIGS. 10A and 10B are flow charts showing processes for deregistering devices in accordance with embodiments of the invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Turning now to the drawings, a federated system for establishing playback parameters for digital content that includes trusted systems is illustrated. Playback parameters define the actions that a playback device is able to perform with respect to a particular piece of digital content. Playback parameters can govern the playing, copying and/or distribution of the content. The system is referred to as federated, because no single system possesses all of the information required to set the playback parameters for a piece of content. In a number of embodiments, content providers can use trusted systems which contain secrets the content providers cannot access to issue playback certifications. The playback certifications that can be used to provide technical protection to digital content such as audio/video presentations, data, games, documents and programs. In many embodiments, the playback certifications dictate how the content can be viewed, edited and/or otherwise accessed by authorized users using authorized equipment. In many instances, the playback certifications can prevent users from removing commercials from an audio/video presentation. In addition, the technical protection incorporated in the playback certifications enables the creation of content distribution systems in accordance with the present invention that are resistant to spoofing and other attempted fraudulent activity. Where multiple classes of devices are supported by a federated system, a single piece of content can be issued with multiple playback certifications. Each of the playback certifications can be customized to a particular class of devices and govern the manner in which that class of device can playback the content.


In several embodiments, the federated system includes a registration system that registers playback devices. The registration process involves establishing one or more “user encryption keys” that are known only to the playback device and the registration entity. The “user encryption keys” can be unique to a device or user or the same encryption keys can be placed in a limited set of devices. Once registered, a playback device can request content from a content provider within the federated system. The content provider can encrypt the content using one or more encryption keys that are only known to the content provider. The content provider then provides the encryption keys used to encrypt the content to a trusted system provided by the registration entity. The trusted system then encrypts copies of the content provider's encryption keys using one or more of a user's “user encryption keys”. In many embodiments, the trusted system encrypts additional information using one or more base keys that can be known by all playback devices, a predetermined class of playback devices or specified groups of playback devices depending upon the structure of the federated system. In instances where a base key is issued with respect to a particular class of devices or a domain, the base key can be referred to as a domain key.


Although many of the embodiments described herein refer to combinations of encryption keys such as base keys, content keys, user keys and frame keys, any of a variety of combinations of keys provided by different entities can be used in a federated system in accordance with embodiments of the invention. In addition, no single technique need be used to register playback devices, provide playback devices with playback certifications and suspend playback devices. Federated systems in accordance with a number of embodiments of the invention provide a single registration entity capable of performing discrete processes for registering and suspending a variety of classes of devices, where each process utilizes the capabilities of each class of device.


An embodiment of a federated system 10 is shown in FIG. 1. The system includes a content server 12 that is connected to a number of playback devices by a network 14. In the illustrated embodiment, three playback devices are shown. The first is a consumer electronics device 16 that is connected to a rendering device 18 such as a television. The second playback device is a computer 20 that is appropriately configured using software. The third is a mobile phone handset 22 that is connected to the network 14 via a wireless link 23. Other devices that can render audio and/or video can also be playback devices in accordance with embodiments of the present invention.


Additional elements of the federated system 10 are a registration server 26 and a trusted system 28. The registration server 26 is connected to the network. Although the trusted system 24 is shown as being directly connected to the content server 12, trusted systems can also be connected to the network and shared by a number of content servers.


In the illustrated embodiment, the registration server 26 can be used to register playback devices within the federated system. A playback device can register to participate within the federated system directly with the registration server or indirectly, for example via a content server that completes the registration by forwarding the registration information to the registration server. Once registered, the playback devices can request content from the content server 12. The content server 12 can provide the playback device with encrypted content that includes one or more playback certifications depending upon the number of classes of devices and/or the versions of playback certifications supported by legacy devices within the federated system. In several embodiments, the playback device uses one or more user encryption keys that the registration server associated with the playback device during registration, one or more base keys inherent to a class of devices and the playback certification to access the content. In a number of embodiments, the content server 12 does not possess, in the clear (i.e., in an unencrypted form), the encryption keys used to encrypt the content. The trusted system 24 does, however, possess the ability to obtain the encryption keys in the clear. Therefore, the content server 12 can provide information requiring encryption to the trusted system 24 for encryption and the trusted system 24 can generate any required playback certifications using the playback device's encryption keys (if required).


As discussed above, playback devices in accordance with the present invention can take a number of different forms. Playback devices can be consumer electronics devices, including stand-alone devices or networked devices that are connected via copper cable, fiber optic cable, wireless connection or other networking technologies. In addition, playback devices can be software that executes on general purpose network computers, such as PCs, servers, workstations and embedded systems. Furthermore, playback devices can take the form of digital electronics cards or printed circuit boards. Moreover, all of the functionality of a playback device can be implemented in an application specific integrated circuit, a field programmable gate array, firmware, software or other electronic device.


The trusted system 24 is essentially a black box that responds to instructions in known ways without revealing any information about the processes it is performing. In a number of embodiments, the trusted systems are opaque in the sense that the base key(s) are stored inside the trusted system and the process of generating a playback certification cannot be ascertained by observation of the trusted system. Trusted systems can be implemented in a number of ways. Several embodiments of trusted systems are implemented using secure software that is tamper resistant. Such software includes software that employs code obfuscation, self modifying code, encrypted code segments, anti-debugging, code integrity, hardware monitoring, split-keys, and/or kernel/driver authentication. In many embodiments, secure hardware is used to implement trusted systems. Examples of secure hardware include programmable hardware security modules such as those that comply with the Federal Information Processing Standard (FIPS) Publication 140-2 specified by the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology and the Communications Security Establishment of the Government of Canada, trusted computing hardware or other types of hardware that are tamper resistant. Examples of such hardware include hardware securely encased in such a way that the hardware is rendered inoperable and/or important information is erased from memory in the event that the encasing is opened. In many embodiments, trusted systems use system-level security including firewalls, network and host-based intrusion detection, system hardening, two-form authentication, physical security (such as secure data centers, security cameras, locked computer racks, physical access control, access logs, etc.) and cascaded network architectures.


An important element of the federated systems described above is the ability to trust in the security of the trusted systems. In many embodiments, the trusted systems are commissioned by the registration entity. The commissioning process typically involves configuring the trusted system and providing the trusted system with information concerning the functions that the trusted system is authorized to perform. For example, a trusted system may be authorized to register playback devices, generate persistent, user-bound playback certifications but may prohibit the generation of base or general playback certifications. Configuration is typically performed by providing an appropriately formatted message to the trusted system.


In many embodiments, the trusted systems generate an audit log of all transactions/operations performed by the secure system. Each entry in the log can be numbered in a monotonically increasing sequence and the log signed using a private key enabling the detection of attempts to alter or remove entries on a log. Content providers can use the log to help detect fraudulent activity. For example, if the number of playback certifications that have been generated exceeds the number that were sold, then it is possible that someone has broken into the content provider's customer database, stolen content and/or user encryption keys and has been using the trusted system to generate unauthorized playback certifications. In addition, the security of the trusted system can be further increased by using different base keys for different device domains and including multiple redundant base keys per device. These measures enable key retirement, revocation and rotation.


In many embodiments, the entity that commissions the trusted systems (typically the entity that registers devices) can exercise limited control over use of a trusted system. In several embodiments, the trusted system can be configured to automatically expire if not updated periodically. Such updates can be used to change the trusted system's entitlements including performing key revocation and redundant key rotations.


A process in accordance with the present invention for obtaining content is shown in FIG. 2. The process 40 includes registering (42) a playback device. Following registration, the playback device can request (44) content. Prior to the content being provided (48) to the playback device, the content is encrypted. The actual content encryption can be done offline, but the final protection for the keys is typically done at the time the content is requested. Upon receipt of the content by the playback device, the content is decrypted (50) and the content is then available for viewing (52).


As discussed above the registration of a playback device involves the playback device being registered with a registration server. In many embodiments, the user device is provided with one or more “user_ids” (i.e., a user identification) and one or more unique “user encryption keys”. Processes for registering playback devices, such as consumer electronics devices, are described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/895,355 filed Jul. 21, 2004 and entitled Optimized Secure Media Playback Control. The disclosure of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/895,355 is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.


Extending on the Optimized Secure Media Playback Control registration process described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/895,355 is a registration process that can be used to register devices capable of interactive communication with a registration server, such as mobile phones, is shown in FIG. 2A. The process 54 includes determining (54a) whether the device has been “activated”. In many embodiments, this determination involves determining whether the device includes has processed an activation record that has been provided by the server. The activation record includes information concerning the active “user_id” and “user encryption key” of the device and the active “base key” that has been assigned to the class of devices to which the device belongs. The activation record can be scrambled and encrypted using public key/private key encryption assigned to the device by the registration service and placed in the device during manufacturing. If the activation record has been processed, then the device can participate (54b) in the federated system, because it will have the user id and user encryption key and be considered activated, also known as “registered”.


When the device has not been activated, the device contacts (54c) the registration server to commence registration. The device provides information including identifying information such as a phone number or a user name and password to the registration server. The server validates (54d) the identifying information and sends (54e) an activation record to the device. The device performs the necessary decryption and/or descrambling processes required to obtain the various activation keys and install (54f) them. Once the installation is complete, the device sends (54g) an activation confirmation code to the server and the server authenticates (54h) the activation code to complete the activation. Although the process shown in FIG. 2A contemplates direct communication between the device and the registration server. The initial communication can occur between a third device such as a networked computer and the registration server. Once the registration is initiated using the networked computer, the registration server can send the activation record to either the computer or the device. If the activation record is sent to the computer, the activation record can then be transferred to the device and used to complete the activation of the device. The activation of the device can be completed by the user entering the human readable codes into a user interface for the registration service.


A registered consumer electronics device in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention is shown in FIG. 3. The registered consumer electronics device 16′ includes ROM 60 that contains a “base encryption key” 62. The “base encryption key” 62 is an encryption key that enables the playback device to be registered within the federated system. In addition to the ROM 60, the consumer electronics device includes a non-volatile memory 64 in which one or more “user_ids” 66 and one or more “user encryption keys” 68 are stored. As discussed above, the “user_id(s)” 66 and “user encryption key(s)” 68 are obtained from a registration server in many embodiments of the present invention.


Although the consumer electronics device shown in FIG. 3 only shows a single “base encryption key” 62 in its ROM, multiple base encryption keys that are each identifiable using a unique identifier can be stored in the ROM. In addition, the encryption keys need not necessarily be stored in the clear. Additional encryption keys and/or scrambling processes can be provided within a playback device that can be used to decrypt the keys for use.


In many embodiments, playback devices support multiple device registrations (i.e., registered to multiple users at a time). In systems where a user has a limit on the number of devices that can be registered, then each user's registration of the device counts against that user's device limit.


When a registered playback device, similar to the playback device shown in FIG. 3 is registered, the registration server creates a user account containing information about the registered device. A registration server in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention is shown in FIG. 4. The registration server 22′ includes a memory in which user accounts 72 are stored. In many embodiments, the user accounts contain the “user_id(s)” 66 and “user encryption key(s)” for a registered device. When a user account includes multiple encryption keys, each “user encryption keys” can be identified using a “user_key_id” that is also stored in the user account. In a number of embodiments, the registration server maintains additional information concerning a user such as other devices registered by the user. In many embodiments, the user can define groups of devices between which the user desires the ability to share content. For example, the user can define a “premium group”, a “syndication group” and a “general group”. Each group can give a different number of device registrations (e.g., “premium group” could include up to 3 devices while “general group” could give up to 10 devices). In embodiments where groups are supported, the registration server can issue a bit vector to a device requesting registration that indicates the groups to which the device belongs. The bit vector can enable content providers to issue playback certifications that enable content to be played on a group of devices or on specific devices only.


Although the above discussion refers to the registration server as a separate device, the registration server can be combined with other devices. In many embodiments, a trusted system also performs the functions of a registration server.


When a device is registered, the device is then able to request content from a content provider. In federated systems in accordance with a number of embodiments of the invention where only one class of device exists, the content server can issue encrypted content to a user with a single playback certification. In other embodiments that support multiple classes of devices, then the content server can issue encrypted content to a user with multiple playback certifications. Each playback certification contains the information required by a particular class of devices to play back the content. In this way, the playback requirements of different classes of device can be accommodated.


An embodiment of a content server connected to a trusted system in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention is shown in FIG. 5. The content server 12′ includes memory 80 that contains a “content encryption key” and “frame encryption keys”. The memory 80 also includes a user account 86 that stores information about the user requesting the content. In a number of embodiments the user account contains an encrypted form of one or more “user encryption keys” 68′. In the illustrated embodiment, the memory 80 contains a “content encryption key” 82 and a table of “frame encryption keys” 84.


The table of “frame encryption keys” 84 can be used to encrypt frames of a video sequence. Processes for encrypting video sequences using frame encryption keys are discussed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/615,898 filed Jul. 8, 2003 and entitled “Method and System for Securing Compressed Digital Video”. The disclosure of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/615,898 is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.


The “content encryption key” 82 and the “frame encryption keys” 84 are generated by the content provider. These keys are provided to the trusted system as part of the generation of the playback certification. In many embodiments, maintaining the “content encryption key” 82 and the “frame encryption keys” 84 within the content provider's system is desirable to limit the potential for the keys to become publicly known. In other embodiments having lower security concerns, the content provider can provide the “content encryption key” 82 and the “frame encryption keys” 84 to another entity to perform the encryption of the content. In a number of embodiments, the content provider provides a video sequence for encryption to the trusted system and the trusted system returns the encrypted content. In several embodiments, the content provider provides the content to a 3rd party system that encrypts the content using any suitable content encryption technique and returns the encrypted content to the content provider.


In the illustrated embodiment, the content server 12′ includes user accounts 86 and the user accounts contain encrypted “user encryption keys” 68′. An advantage of maintaining the user account at the content server is that no communication with devices outside of the content provider's system is required to issue content. Where communication with other devices is acceptable, the encrypted “user encryption keys” 68′ can be provided by the playback device and the encrypted “user encryption key” 68′ encrypted using either the “base encryption keys” or other encryption keys. In other embodiments, the content server 12′ requests that the registration server provide the encrypted “user encryption keys” 68′ and the encrypted “user encryption keys” 68′ are encrypted using the “base encryption keys” or other encryption keys.


In the illustrated embodiment, the trusted system 24′ also includes a memory 86 that contains a set of keys that the trusted system 24′ can use to issue playback certifications. These keys includes the active base key(s) 86 that are used by various classes of device. The set of keys can also include inactive base keys in anticipation of key retirements. As discussed above, the content server 12′ does not see in the clear encryption keys used by the trusted system 24′ to generate playback certifications.


The keys possessed by the content server and the trusted system can be used to encrypt content for distribution to a user. The content can be a video sequence, an audio sequence, a still photograph or a file. In embodiments, where content other than a video sequence is encrypted the keys described as the “frame encryption keys” are used to encrypt at least a portion of the content.


A process in accordance with the present invention for encrypting content and generating a playback certification is shown in FIG. 6. The process 90 includes encrypting (92) the content using “frame encryption keys”. The “frame encryption keys” are then encrypted (94) using the “content encryption keys”. The “content encryption key” is then encrypted (96) using the one or more “user encryption key(s)”, which enables for “user encryption key” revocation or retirement (see discussion below) and then digital rights specified with respect to the content by the content provider are then encrypted (98) using one or more “base encryption keys” appropriate to the class of device for which the playback certification is being issued. Again, the use of multiple “base encryption keys” allows for “base encryption key” revocation or retirement (see discussion below). The resulting bundle of variously encrypted pieces of information are used to create the playback certification. The playback certification is incorporated (100) with the encrypted content to create a file for distribution to the user that requested the content. In embodiments where more than one base key is used, a base key identifier is also included in the file. In embodiments where multiple playback certifications are provided, each playback certification can include information identifying the type of playback certification, such as a version number.


As discussed above, the distribution of the various encryption keys throughout the system varies. In many embodiments, the content, the rights granted and the “user_id” are provided to a trusted system and the trusted system returns an encrypted file including a playback certification for distribution to a user. In other embodiments, the content provider sends the secure system simply the information requiring encryption by the one or more “user encryption keys” and one or more “base encryption keys”. In other embodiments, other combinations of keys provided by different entities are used to secure information necessary to access technically protected content. As discussed above, the technique used to technically protect the content can vary depending upon the security needs of entities within the federated system.


A server providing a trusted system with information for the generation of one or more playback certifications in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention is shown in FIG. 7. The server provides the trusted system with a message 100 that includes a content message 102, a user message 104 and instructions 106 concerning the type(s) of playback certification to generate. The trusted system receives the message 100 and replies with a message 108 that contains the playback certification(s) 109. The content message 102 contains one or more content keys issued by the content provider with respect to a specific piece of content and access control that governs the operations that can be performed by a trusted system with respect to that piece of content (e.g., whether the trusted system is allowed to generate a playback certification, the types of playback certifications that are allowed for that content and/or whether the content is bound to a user or bound to a media). The user message 104 contains the “user encryption keys” for the specific user that is requesting the content as well as access control governing what operations the user authorizes the trusted system to perform (e.g., limiting slot-based playback certifications to specific slots). The instructions 106 concerning the playback parameters of the playback certification being issued specify the manner in which a user can access the content.


The rights that can be granted by a content provider to users can be customized by the content provider and are typically based upon the content restrictions supported by playback devices registered within the federated system. For example, a content provider can provide general access to any registered device (a variation where no “user encryption key” or other form of restriction to a specific user is used in the generation of the playback certification).


Another type of playback certification is a persistent certification, where the content provider provides the user with rights and the content can be copied with the same playback certification(s). Where multiple playback certifications are provided to support multiple classes of device, each of the playback certifications is copied.


A slot based rental is a type of playback certification where content is certified for playback on a rental slot. For example, a user with eight slots can have up to eight rentals active at a time. When the ninth rental is certified, then the certification for one of the previous eight rentals automatically expires (i.e., the user loses the ability to access the content). With slot based rentals, the content can be copied with the same playback certification(s).


A count-based rental is a playback certification that enables the content to be used a fixed number of times, after which it expires. The content can be copied with the same playback certification(s). A time-expiration rental is a playback certification that grants access to content for a fixed period of time. The time period can be absolute (e.g., Jun. 2, 2006) or relative to the first time the content is used (e.g., 24-hour rental).


Another type of playback certification is fixed media copy protection. A fixed media copy protection playback certification is encrypted without using a “user encryption key” (i.e., is not tied to a user) and is bound to its original fixed media (e.g., flash media, optical disc, secure flash drive). Content assigned a fixed media copy protection playback certification cannot be copied. A recordable media copy protection certification is another type of playback certification that is technically protected without using a “user encryption key”. The content may be initially downloaded and stored onto recordable media, but once recorded cannot be copied or re-recorded. Variations of this playback certification can enable a predetermined number of copies to be made securely from the original, progenitor copy. In addition to the above certifications, content can be protected using any of the above certifications and then sold via a subscription service.


In a number of embodiments, the content includes a playback certification that can be provided with the content as a guest certification. The guest certification can be used to enable extremely limited play back by a user in response to the recommendation of the content by another user. For example, the guest certification may enable a user receiving the content to view the content for a short period of time or a single time. In other embodiments, a user can enjoy a subscription and be entitled to playback all or predetermined subsets of available content while the subscription is in effect. In systems where subscriptions are supported, content can have an additional subscription playback certification associated with the content that governs the subscribers that can access the content.


As discussed above, many embodiments of the invention associate more than one playback certification with a single piece of content. When more than one playback certification is associated with a piece of content, a playback device can search for and use any playback certification that enables the content to be accessed by the playback device. Each of the playback certifications can specify different playback parameters, enable access to different users and/or enable access to different device groups. In a number of embodiments, a user can receive content with a particular type of certification (e.g. guest) and can obtain a different type of playback certification from the content provider. The user's device can then incorporate the different type of playback certification into the file that includes the content.


Once a file has been formed including the technically protected content and a playback certification, the file can be provided to a playback device. A process for accessing the content for playback in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention is shown in FIG. 8. The process 120 includes identifying (122) the active “base encryption key” for the particular class of device that is attempting to access the content, which can be used to access information concerning the type of playback parameters supported by the playback certification. The active “user encryption key” is then used to decrypt (124) the version of the “content encryption key” that was encrypted by the active “user encryption key”. The “content encryption key” is then used to decrypt (126) the table of “frame encryption keys” used in the technical protections of the content. The table of “frame encryption keys” can then be used to play back (128) the content. Any decryption of the content typically occurs as the content is being viewed.


Information available in the clear during the decryption of a playback certification issued for devices that include a single base encryption key and a single user encryption key in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention is shown in FIGS. 9A-9D. The information within the playback certification 140 that is initially available in the clear 142 is the “Base_ID”, which identifies the “base encryption key” used to encrypt information concerning the playback parameters supported by the playback certification. In the illustrated embodiment, the identified “base encryption key” is used to decrypt the “Type” 144 and the “Rental” 146 information. The “Type” 144 and the “Rental” 146 information specify the manner in which the user play back and otherwise deal with the content (e.g., “Rental” 146 can specify the rental slot occupied by the content). In other embodiments, the playback parameters are expressed using other combinations of information.


In embodiments where the “Type” information 144 indicates that general rights have been granted in the content (i.e., rights granted to all users), the “base encryption key” can also be used to decrypt the “content encryption key” 148. Otherwise, the “content encryption key” is decrypted using the “user encryption key” stored on the playback device. Once the “content encryption key” 148 is in the clear, it can be used to decrypt the table of “frame encryption keys”. Once a playback device has the “frame encryption keys” the playback device has all of the information necessary to access the content and the “Type” 144 and the “Rental” 146 information regulate how the playback device accesses the content.


In the embodiment shown in FIGS. 9A-9D, the playback certification was issued with respect to devices that have a single “base encryption key” and a single “user encryption key”. As discussed above, a single piece of content can have multiple playback certifications associated with it to accommodate various classes of device. Federated systems in accordance with many embodiments of the invention support the assignment of multiple “base encryption keys” to domains of devices and the assignment of multiple “user encryption keys” to a user account (typically only the active “user encryption key” is actually provided to the device at any given time). Therefore, playback certifications can be created that include multiple “base encryption keys” and multiple “user encryption keys”. An advantage of using multiple keys is that over time individual keys can be retired or revoked and the remaining keys can still be used to access the content. In one embodiment, each of the “base encryption keys” is used to encrypt the same information. Similarly, each of the “user encryption keys” are used to encrypt the “content encryption key” 148. A table can be formed using each instance in which the information is encrypted using one of the multiple encryption keys. For example, playback certifications in accordance with many embodiments of the invention do not include a single “content encryption key” 148 encrypted using a “user encryption key” as is shown in FIGS. 9A-9D. Rather, the playback certifications include a table where each entry in the table is the “content encryption key” encrypted using a different “user encryption key”. The same is also true with respect to tables of information encrypted with different “base encryption keys”. The retirement and revocation of keys is discussed further below.


Many embodiments of the invention enable users to deregister a device. For example, a user may wish to replace a device and register a new device. A process that a user can use to deregister a registered device is shown in FIG. 10A. The process 160 includes receiving (162) user instructions to deactivate the device. The user instruction typically includes a confirmation, which is due to the significance of the action being taken. The device then erases (164) the activation information (i.e., the activation record and/or installed activation keys) obtained during registration and generates (166) a deactivation code. The deactivation code can be generated using a predetermined processes that is seeded by at least some of the activation information. The deactivation code is transferred to the registration server as part of a deregistration request (168). The server authenticates (170) the deactivation code and then removes (172) the device from its register of activated devices. Although the process described above discusses the device itself communication the deactivation code to the registration server, the deactivation code can also be provided to the server via a third device such as a computer. In a number of embodiments, a deregistered device generates a deactivation code that the user provides to the server by manually entering the deactivation code via a web interface.


Another process for deregistering a device in accordance with an embodiment of the invention is shown in FIG. 10B. The process 160′ is similar to the process 160 shown in FIG. 10A. The main difference is that the process 160′ is a server initiated process. A user connects (180) to the server and instructs (182) the server to deactivate the device. The server records (184) that the device has been deactivated. The next time the device contacts (186) the server, the device learns of its deactivation and generates (188) a deactivation code that is sent (190) to the server. The server (192) authenticates the deactivation code to confirm that the device has been deactivated.


In addition to users deregistering devices, several embodiments of federated systems in accordance with the invention enable revocation of devices or “base encryption keys” associated with a class of device to prevent abuse of the system. Each type of revocation relies on the use of tables of information, where each entry in the table is the same piece of information (such as content key) encrypted using a different encryption key (see discussion above). A device's ability to access the information depends upon the particular encryption key the device possesses. When multiple different domains of devices exist, each domain can be issued a set of “base encryption keys”. These keys can be protected using different scrambles for each system, but the underlying key material remains the same. For example the “Java Mobile Phone” domain can be defined to issue the same set of “base encryption keys” to every mobile phone that supports a Java operating system. However different models of receive different scrambles of the keys. If a key is compromised, it can be revoked by the registration server. As discussed above, “base encryption keys” are used to generate tables where each entry is a piece of information encrypted with a different “base encryption key”. When a key is revoked, the key is no longer one of the keys used in the generation of the table. If the revoked key was extracted in a circumvention tool, that tool will no longer work.


Revocation of a specific device works in a similar fashion. In many embodiments, a device is provided with a single active “user encryption key” during registration. If the user's device is revoked, the user's active “user encryption key” will no longer be used as one of the encryption keys when forming a “content encryption key” table as part of a playback certification (see discussion above). If the revoked “user encryption key” was extracted in a circumvention tool, that tool will no longer work. The user's device must be registered again in order to obtain a new “user encryption key” that will enable the user to access any newly issued content. The new active “user encryption key” is one of the keys associated with the device by the registration server and is also one of the keys used by the federated system to encrypt the “content encryption key”, when issuing a playback certification. Storing the full set of user keys at the registration server and providing user devices with a single “user encryption key” during registration facilitates key revocation. Content is protected for all “user encryption keys”. If a “user encryption key” is leaked, then subsequent content will not be accessible with that key.


Key revocation can also be used to prevent abuses that may result from the discovery of a content provider's encryption keys. In many federated systems in accordance with embodiments of the invention, media key blocks are distributed to different content providers and a breach of security associated with a particular content provider's media key(s) can be minimized by deactivating that content provider's media key(s). Such a deactivation would not impact content provided by other content providers. Such a revocation would also not impact content previously provided to registered playback devices using the deactivated media key(s). The revocation would, however, prevent access to new content issued by the content distributor as the deactivated media key(s) would no longer provide access to the information within the new playback certifications required to play back the technically protected content.


While the above description contains many specific embodiments of the invention, these should not be construed as limitations on the scope of the invention, but rather as an example of one embodiment thereof. For example, the above system can be used to create a private player network for use in, for example, the secure distribution and viewing of pre-released content. In this scenario, the content provider could use a common “user encryption key” that is possessed by all devices within the private network to generate a playback certification. In other embodiments, the content provider can issue a playback certification that is associated with a device identification number and multiple playback certifications could be embedded in content to enable a user to play the content on each registered device. In addition, a greater number of entities within the system (i.e., more than simply the registration entity and the content provider) can be provided with an opportunity to contribute to the generation of the playback certification. Furthermore, a variety of encryption techniques in addition to those described above can be used in the encryption of content and the various pieces of information included in the playback certification. As an additional security measure, information included in the playback certification can be scrambled using a scramble function or a predetermined sequence of scramble functions selected from a set of scramble functions. Accordingly, the scope of the invention should be determined not by the embodiments illustrated, but by the appended claims and their equivalents.

Claims
  • 1. A federated system for distributing encrypted multimedia content for playback comprising: a trusted registration server system configured to authorize distribution of encrypted content by a plurality of content provider server systems that utilize different digital rights management systems;wherein the trusted registration server system is configured to: maintain a set of user accounts;receive a first set of information for a piece of multimedia content from a first content provider server system from the plurality of content provider server systems, wherein the first content provider server system distributes content utilizing a first protection schema and the first set of information comprises: rights granted with respect to the piece of multimedia content; anda user ID associated with a first user account from the set of user accounts; andauthorize distribution of the piece of multimedia content by a second content provider server system from the plurality of content provider server systems based on the first set of information, wherein the second content provider server system distributes content utilizing a different second protection schema;wherein the second content provider server system is configured to: store a first encrypted copy of the piece of multimedia content, where the first encrypted copy is encrypted using at least a content key;receive authorization to distribute the piece of multimedia content from the trusted registration server based on the first set of information;receive a request for the piece of multimedia content from the first media player; andprovide a first encrypted copy of the piece of multimedia content and a first playback certification to the first media player, where: the first playback certification is generated according to the second protection schema after receiving authorization from the trusted registration server to distribute the piece of multimedia content and the request for the piece of multimedia content from the first media player; andthe first playback certification enables playback of the first encrypted copy of the piece of multimedia content by the first media player.
  • 2. The federated system of claim 1, wherein the first playback certification from the second content provider server system cannot be used with a second encrypted copy of the piece of multimedia content from a third content provider server system.
  • 3. The federated system of claim 1, wherein the rights granted with respect to the piece of multimedia content are associated with the user ID.
  • 4. The federated system of claim 1, wherein the rights granted with respect to the piece of multimedia content are associated with the first media player.
  • 5. The federated system of claim 1, wherein the trusted registration server system authorizes distribution of the piece of multimedia content by communicating a second set of information for the piece of multimedia content to the second content provider server system, wherein the second set of information comprises rights associated with the piece of multimedia content for the first user account.
  • 6. The federated system of claim 1, wherein the trusted registration server system is further configured to: receive a second set of information for a second piece of multimedia content from the second content provider server system, wherein the second set of information comprises: rights granted with respect to the second piece of multimedia content; anda user ID associated with the first user account from the set of user accounts; andauthorize distribution of the second piece of multimedia content by the first content provider server system.
  • 7. The federated system of claim 1, wherein the first playback certification comprises a set of one or more content encryption keys comprising the at least one content key for decrypting the first encrypted copy of the piece of multimedia content.
  • 8. The federated system of claim 7, wherein the set of one or more content encryption keys is encrypted using a set of one or more user encryption keys.
  • 9. The federated system of claim 8, wherein second content provider server system is further configured to maintain the set of user encryption keys.
  • 10. The federated system of claim 7, wherein the at least one content key is used to generate a frame encryption key.
  • 11. The federated system of claim 1, wherein the first playback certification is a first of a plurality of playback certifications for the piece of multimedia content, wherein each playback certification of the plurality of playback certifications enables playback of the piece of multimedia content by a different class of devices.
  • 12. The federated system of claim 1, wherein the trusted registration server system is implemented using secure software that is tamper resistant.
  • 13. The federated system of claim 1, wherein the trusted registration server system is implemented using secure hardware that is tamper resistant.
  • 14. The federated system of claim 1, wherein the different digital rights management systems use different types of DRM licenses.
  • 15. A method for distributing encrypted multimedia content for playback comprising: maintaining a set of user accounts;receiving a first set of information for a piece of multimedia content from a first content provider server system from a plurality of content provider server systems, wherein the first content provider server system distributes content utilizing a first protection schema and the first set of information comprises: rights granted with respect to the piece of multimedia content; anda user ID associated with a first user account from the set of user accounts; andauthorizing distribution of the piece of multimedia content by a second content provider server system based on the first set of information, wherein the second content provider server system is configured to distribute content utilizing a different second protection schema, wherein the second content provider server system: stores a first encrypted copy of the piece of multimedia content, where the first encrypted copy is encrypted using at least a content key;receives authorization from a trusted registration server to distribute the piece of multimedia content;receives a request for the piece of multimedia content from the first media player; andprovides a first encrypted copy of the piece of multimedia content and a first playback certification to the first media player, where: the first playback certification is generated according to the second protection schema after receiving authorization from the trusted registration server to distribute the piece of multimedia content and a request for the piece of multimedia content from the first media player, andthe first playback certification enables playback of the first encrypted copy of the piece of multimedia content by the first media player.
  • 16. The method of claim 15, wherein authorizing distribution of the piece of multimedia content comprises communicating a second set of information for the piece of multimedia content to the second content provider server system, wherein the second set of information comprises rights associated with the piece of multimedia content for the first user account.
  • 17. The method of claim 15 further comprising: receiving a second set of information for a second piece of multimedia content from the second content provider server system, wherein the second set of information comprises: rights granted with respect to the second piece of multimedia content; anda user ID associated with the first user account from the set of user accounts; andauthorizing distribution of the second piece of multimedia content by the first content provider server system.
  • 18. The method of claim 17, wherein the at least one content encryption key is encrypted using a set of one or more user encryption keys.
  • 19. The method of claim 14, wherein the at least one content key is used to generate a frame encryption key.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/928,746 filed Oct. 30, 2015, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/183,360 filed Feb. 18, 2014 and issued Nov. 10, 2015 as U.S. Pat. No. 9,184,920, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/489,409 filed Jun. 5, 2012 and issued Feb. 18, 2014 as U.S. Pat. No. 8,656,183, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/411,271 filed Mar. 25, 2009 and issued Jun. 12, 2012 as U.S. Pat. No. 8,201,264, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/685,929 filed Mar. 14, 2007 and issued Apr. 7, 2009 as U.S. Pat. No. 7,515,710, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/782,215 filed Mar. 14, 2006, the disclosures of which are fully incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (758)
Number Name Date Kind
4009331 Goldmark et al. Feb 1977 A
4694357 Rahman et al. Sep 1987 A
4802170 Trottier Jan 1989 A
4964069 Ely Oct 1990 A
5119474 Beitel et al. Jun 1992 A
5274758 Beitel et al. Dec 1993 A
5361332 Yoshida et al. Nov 1994 A
5396497 Veltman Mar 1995 A
5404436 Hamilton Apr 1995 A
5420801 Dockter et al. May 1995 A
5420974 Morris et al. May 1995 A
5471576 Yee Nov 1995 A
5479303 Suzuki et al. Dec 1995 A
5487167 Dinallo et al. Jan 1996 A
5502766 Boebert et al. Mar 1996 A
5509070 Schull Apr 1996 A
5533021 Branstad et al. Jul 1996 A
5537408 Branstad et al. Jul 1996 A
5539908 Chen et al. Jul 1996 A
5541662 Adams et al. Jul 1996 A
5574785 Ueno et al. Nov 1996 A
5583652 Ware Dec 1996 A
5589993 Naimpally et al. Dec 1996 A
5600721 Kitazato Feb 1997 A
5621794 Matsuda et al. Apr 1997 A
5627936 Prasad May 1997 A
5633472 DeWitt et al. May 1997 A
5642171 Baumgartner et al. Jun 1997 A
5655117 Goldberg et al. Aug 1997 A
5664044 Ware Sep 1997 A
5675382 Bauchspies Oct 1997 A
5675511 Prasad et al. Oct 1997 A
5684542 Tsukagoshi Nov 1997 A
5715403 Stefik Feb 1998 A
5717816 Boyce et al. Feb 1998 A
5719786 Nelson et al. Feb 1998 A
5745643 Mishina Apr 1998 A
5751280 Abbott May 1998 A
5754648 Ryan May 1998 A
5763800 Rossum et al. Jun 1998 A
5765164 Prasad et al. Jun 1998 A
5794018 Vrvilo et al. Aug 1998 A
5805700 Nardone et al. Sep 1998 A
5822524 Chen et al. Oct 1998 A
5828370 Moeller et al. Oct 1998 A
5841432 Carmel et al. Nov 1998 A
5844575 Reid Dec 1998 A
5848217 Tsukagoshi et al. Dec 1998 A
5867625 McLaren Feb 1999 A
5887110 Sakamoto et al. Mar 1999 A
5892900 Ginter Apr 1999 A
5903261 Walsh et al. May 1999 A
5907597 Mark May 1999 A
5946446 Yanagihara Aug 1999 A
5956729 Goetz et al. Sep 1999 A
5959690 Toebes, VIII et al. Sep 1999 A
5970147 Davis Oct 1999 A
5999812 Himsworth Dec 1999 A
6031622 Ristow et al. Feb 2000 A
6038257 Brusewitz et al. Mar 2000 A
6044469 Horstmann Mar 2000 A
6046778 Nonomura et al. Apr 2000 A
6047100 McLaren Apr 2000 A
6058240 McLaren May 2000 A
6064794 McLaren et al. May 2000 A
6065050 DeMoney May 2000 A
6018611 Nogami et al. Jun 2000 A
6079566 Eleftheriadis et al. Jun 2000 A
6097877 Katayama et al. Aug 2000 A
6141754 Choy Oct 2000 A
6155840 Sallette Dec 2000 A
6169242 Fay et al. Jan 2001 B1
6175921 Rosen Jan 2001 B1
6195388 Choi et al. Feb 2001 B1
6204883 Tsukagoshi Mar 2001 B1
6222981 Rijckaert Apr 2001 B1
6282653 Berstis et al. Aug 2001 B1
6289450 Pensak et al. Sep 2001 B1
6292621 Tanaka et al. Sep 2001 B1
6308005 Ando et al. Oct 2001 B1
6330286 Lyons et al. Dec 2001 B1
6374144 Viviani et al. Apr 2002 B1
6389218 Gordon et al. May 2002 B2
6389473 Carmel et al. May 2002 B1
6395969 Fuhrer May 2002 B1
6397230 Carmel et al. May 2002 B1
6415031 Colligan et al. Jul 2002 B1
6418270 Steenhof et al. Jul 2002 B1
6449719 Baker Sep 2002 B1
6466671 Maillard Oct 2002 B1
6466733 Kim Oct 2002 B1
6504873 Vehvilaeinen Jan 2003 B1
6510513 Danieli Jan 2003 B1
6510554 Gordon et al. Jan 2003 B1
6621979 Eerenberg et al. Sep 2003 B1
6625320 Nilsson et al. Sep 2003 B1
6658056 Duruöz et al. Dec 2003 B1
6665835 Gutfreund et al. Dec 2003 B1
6671408 Kaku Dec 2003 B1
6690838 Zhou Feb 2004 B2
6697568 Kaku Feb 2004 B1
6725281 Zintel et al. Apr 2004 B1
6771703 Oguz et al. Aug 2004 B1
6807306 Girgensohn et al. Oct 2004 B1
6810031 Hegde et al. Oct 2004 B1
6810389 Meyer Oct 2004 B1
6819394 Nomura et al. Nov 2004 B1
6850252 Hoffberg Feb 2005 B1
6856997 Lee et al. Feb 2005 B2
6859496 Boroczky et al. Feb 2005 B1
6868525 Szabo Mar 2005 B1
6917652 Lyu Jul 2005 B2
6931531 Takahashi Aug 2005 B1
6944621 Collart Sep 2005 B1
6944629 Shioi et al. Sep 2005 B1
6956901 Boroczky et al. Oct 2005 B2
6957350 Demos Oct 2005 B1
6965724 Boccon-Gibod et al. Nov 2005 B1
6965993 Baker Nov 2005 B2
6985588 Glick et al. Jan 2006 B1
6988144 Luken et al. Jan 2006 B1
7007170 Morten Feb 2006 B2
7023924 Keller et al. Apr 2006 B1
7043473 Rassool et al. May 2006 B1
7103906 Katz et al. Sep 2006 B1
7127155 Ando et al. Oct 2006 B2
7150045 Koelle et al. Dec 2006 B2
7151832 Fetkovich et al. Dec 2006 B1
7151833 Candelore et al. Dec 2006 B2
7165175 Kollmyer et al. Jan 2007 B1
7181438 Szabo Feb 2007 B1
7185363 Narin et al. Feb 2007 B1
7197234 Chatterton Mar 2007 B1
7206940 Evans et al. Apr 2007 B2
7209892 Galuten et al. Apr 2007 B1
7231132 Davenport Jun 2007 B1
7237061 Boic Jun 2007 B1
7242772 Tehranchi Jul 2007 B1
7243346 Seth et al. Jul 2007 B1
7295673 Grab et al. Nov 2007 B2
7328345 Morten et al. Feb 2008 B2
7330875 Parasnis et al. Feb 2008 B1
7340528 Noblecourt et al. Mar 2008 B2
7349886 Morten et al. Mar 2008 B2
7356143 Morten Apr 2008 B2
7356245 Belknap et al. Apr 2008 B2
7366788 Jones et al. Apr 2008 B2
7376831 Kollmyer et al. May 2008 B2
7406174 Palmer Jul 2008 B2
7421411 Kontio et al. Sep 2008 B2
7454780 Katsube et al. Nov 2008 B2
7457359 Mabey et al. Nov 2008 B2
7457415 Reitmeier et al. Nov 2008 B2
7460668 Grab et al. Dec 2008 B2
7472280 Giobbi Dec 2008 B2
7478325 Foehr Jan 2009 B2
7484103 Woo et al. Jan 2009 B2
7493018 Kim Feb 2009 B2
7499938 Collart Mar 2009 B2
7515710 Russell et al. Apr 2009 B2
7526450 Hughes et al. Apr 2009 B2
7594271 Zhuk et al. Sep 2009 B2
7610365 Kraft et al. Oct 2009 B1
7640435 Morten Dec 2009 B2
7689510 Lamkin et al. Mar 2010 B2
7720352 Belknap et al. May 2010 B2
7747853 Candelore et al. Jun 2010 B2
7761892 Ellis et al. Jul 2010 B2
7779097 Lamkin et al. Aug 2010 B2
7788271 Soma et al. Aug 2010 B2
7817608 Rassool et al. Oct 2010 B2
7869691 Kelly et al. Jan 2011 B2
7882034 Hug et al. Feb 2011 B2
7949703 Matsuzaki et al. May 2011 B2
7962942 Craner Jun 2011 B1
7974714 Hoffberg Jul 2011 B2
7984513 Kyne Jul 2011 B1
7991156 Miller Aug 2011 B1
8023562 Zheludkov et al. Sep 2011 B2
8046453 Olaiya Oct 2011 B2
8054880 Yu et al. Nov 2011 B2
8065708 Smyth et al. Nov 2011 B1
8069260 Speicher et al. Nov 2011 B2
8082442 Keljo et al. Dec 2011 B2
8195714 Mckibben et al. Jun 2012 B2
8201264 Grab et al. Jun 2012 B2
8225061 Greenebaum Jul 2012 B2
8233768 Soroushian et al. Jul 2012 B2
8243924 Chen et al. Aug 2012 B2
8245124 Gupta Aug 2012 B1
8249168 Graves Aug 2012 B2
8261356 Choi et al. Sep 2012 B2
8265168 Masterson et al. Sep 2012 B1
8270473 Chen et al. Sep 2012 B2
8270819 Vannier Sep 2012 B2
8275871 Ram et al. Sep 2012 B2
8289338 Priyadarshi et al. Oct 2012 B2
8291460 Peacock Oct 2012 B1
8296434 Miller et al. Oct 2012 B1
8311111 Xu et al. Nov 2012 B2
8311115 Gu et al. Nov 2012 B2
8321556 Chatterjee et al. Nov 2012 B1
8341715 Sherkin et al. Dec 2012 B2
8386621 Park Feb 2013 B2
8396114 Gu et al. Mar 2013 B2
8401900 Cansler et al. Mar 2013 B2
8407753 Kuo Mar 2013 B2
8412841 Swaminathan et al. Apr 2013 B1
8423889 Zagorie et al. Apr 2013 B1
8452110 Shoham et al. May 2013 B2
8456380 Pagan Jun 2013 B2
8472792 Butt et al. Jun 2013 B2
8473630 Galligan et al. Jun 2013 B1
8510303 Soroushian et al. Aug 2013 B2
8510404 Carmel et al. Aug 2013 B2
8515265 Kwon et al. Aug 2013 B2
8516529 Lajoie et al. Aug 2013 B2
8527645 Proffit et al. Sep 2013 B1
8595378 Cohn Nov 2013 B1
8606069 Okubo et al. Dec 2013 B2
8640166 Craner et al. Jan 2014 B1
8649669 Braness et al. Feb 2014 B2
8656183 Russell et al. Feb 2014 B2
8677428 Lewis et al. Mar 2014 B2
8681866 Jia Mar 2014 B1
8683066 Hurst et al. Mar 2014 B2
8689267 Hunt Apr 2014 B2
8726264 Allen et al. May 2014 B1
RE45052 Li Jul 2014 E
8767825 Wang et al. Jul 2014 B1
8774609 Drake et al. Jul 2014 B2
8781122 Chan et al. Jul 2014 B2
8805109 Shoham et al. Aug 2014 B2
8806188 Braness et al. Aug 2014 B2
8832434 Apostolopoulos et al. Sep 2014 B2
8843586 Pantos et al. Sep 2014 B2
8849950 Stockhammer et al. Sep 2014 B2
8856218 Inskip Oct 2014 B1
8908984 Shoham et al. Dec 2014 B2
8909922 Kiefer et al. Dec 2014 B2
8914534 Braness et al. Dec 2014 B2
8914836 Shivadas et al. Dec 2014 B2
8918535 Ma et al. Dec 2014 B2
8918636 Kiefer Dec 2014 B2
8918908 Ziskind et al. Dec 2014 B2
8948249 Sun et al. Feb 2015 B2
8997161 Priyadarshi et al. Mar 2015 B2
8997254 Amidei et al. Mar 2015 B2
9014471 Shoham et al. Apr 2015 B2
9025659 Soroushian et al. May 2015 B2
9038116 Knox et al. May 2015 B1
9042670 Carmel et al. May 2015 B2
9060207 Scherkus et al. Jun 2015 B2
9094737 Shivadas et al. Jul 2015 B2
9098335 Muthiah et al. Aug 2015 B2
9124773 Chan et al. Sep 2015 B2
9125073 Oyman et al. Sep 2015 B2
9184920 Grab et al. Nov 2015 B2
9191457 Van der Schaar Nov 2015 B2
9197685 Soroushian Nov 2015 B2
9203816 Brueck et al. Dec 2015 B2
9210481 Braness et al. Dec 2015 B2
9215466 Zhai et al. Dec 2015 B2
9247311 Kiefer Jan 2016 B2
9247312 Braness et al. Jan 2016 B2
9247317 Shivadas et al. Jan 2016 B2
9253178 Blom et al. Feb 2016 B2
9264475 Shivadas et al. Feb 2016 B2
9294531 Zhang et al. Mar 2016 B2
9313510 Shivadas et al. Apr 2016 B2
9343112 Amidei et al. May 2016 B2
9344517 Shivadas et al. May 2016 B2
9344721 Dikvall May 2016 B2
9479805 Rothschild et al. Oct 2016 B2
9485546 Chen et al. Nov 2016 B2
9571827 Su et al. Feb 2017 B2
9584557 Panje et al. Feb 2017 B2
9584847 Ma et al. Feb 2017 B2
9621522 Kiefer et al. Apr 2017 B2
9706259 Chan et al. Jul 2017 B2
9712890 Shivadas et al. Jul 2017 B2
9798863 Grab et al. Oct 2017 B2
9813740 Panje et al. Nov 2017 B2
9866878 van der Schaar et al. Jan 2018 B2
9883204 Braness et al. Jan 2018 B2
9906785 Naletov et al. Feb 2018 B2
9967189 Patel et al. May 2018 B2
9967305 Braness May 2018 B2
10225588 Kiefer et al. Mar 2019 B2
20010030710 Werner Oct 2001 A1
20010036355 Kelly et al. Nov 2001 A1
20010046299 Wasilewski et al. Nov 2001 A1
20010053222 Wakao et al. Dec 2001 A1
20020026560 Jordan et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020034252 Owen et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020051494 Yamaguchi May 2002 A1
20020057898 Normile May 2002 A1
20020062313 Lee et al. May 2002 A1
20020076112 Devara Jun 2002 A1
20020087569 Fischer et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020091665 Beek et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020093571 Hyodo Jul 2002 A1
20020110193 Yoo Aug 2002 A1
20020116481 Lee Aug 2002 A1
20020118953 Kim Aug 2002 A1
20020120934 Abrahams et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020136298 Anantharamu et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020143413 Fay et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020143547 Fay et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020147980 Satoda Oct 2002 A1
20020159598 Rubinstein et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020161462 Fay Oct 2002 A1
20020180929 Tseng et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020184159 Tadayon et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020184515 Oho et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020191112 Akiyoshi et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020191959 Lin et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020191960 Fujinami et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030001964 Masukura Jan 2003 A1
20030002578 Tsukagoshi et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030005442 Brodersen et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030021296 Wee et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030031178 Haeri Feb 2003 A1
20030035488 Barrau Feb 2003 A1
20030035545 Jiang Feb 2003 A1
20030035546 Jiang et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030041257 Wee et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030061305 Copley et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030061369 Aksu et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030065777 Mattila et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030078891 Capitant Apr 2003 A1
20030078930 Surcouf et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030093799 Kauffman May 2003 A1
20030123855 Okada et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030128296 Lee Jul 2003 A1
20030133506 Haneda Jul 2003 A1
20030152370 Otomo et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030163824 Gordon et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030165328 Grecia Sep 2003 A1
20030174844 Candelore Sep 2003 A1
20030185302 Abrams Oct 2003 A1
20030185542 McVeigh Oct 2003 A1
20030206558 Parkkinen et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030216922 Gonzales et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030229900 Reisman Dec 2003 A1
20030231863 Eerenberg et al. Dec 2003 A1
20030231867 Gates et al. Dec 2003 A1
20030233464 Walpole et al. Dec 2003 A1
20030236836 Borthwick Dec 2003 A1
20030236907 Stewart et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040006701 Kresina Jan 2004 A1
20040021684 Millner Feb 2004 A1
20040022391 Obrien Feb 2004 A1
20040024688 Bi et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040025180 Begeja et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040031058 Reisman Feb 2004 A1
20040039916 Aldis et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040047614 Green Mar 2004 A1
20040052501 Tam Mar 2004 A1
20040071453 Valderas Apr 2004 A1
20040081333 Grab et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040081434 Jung et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040093618 Baldwin et al. May 2004 A1
20040105549 Suzuki et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040114687 Ferris et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040117347 Seo et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040136698 Mock Jul 2004 A1
20040139335 Diamand et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040143760 Alkove et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040146276 Ogawa Jul 2004 A1
20040158878 Ratnakar et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040184534 Wang Sep 2004 A1
20040184616 Morten et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040202320 Amini et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040217971 Kim Nov 2004 A1
20040255115 DeMello et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040255236 Collart Dec 2004 A1
20050004875 Kontio et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050005025 Harville et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050008385 Kocher Jan 2005 A1
20050015797 Noblecourt et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050038826 Bae et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050055399 Savchuk Mar 2005 A1
20050063541 Candelore Mar 2005 A1
20050071280 Irwin Mar 2005 A1
20050108320 Lord et al. May 2005 A1
20050114534 Lee May 2005 A1
20050114896 Hug May 2005 A1
20050149450 Stefik et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050177741 Chen et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050180641 Clark Aug 2005 A1
20050183120 Jain et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050193070 Brown et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050193322 Lamkin et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050196147 Seo et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050204289 Mohammed et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050207442 Zoest et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050207578 Matsuyama et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050223412 Nadalin Oct 2005 A1
20050254508 Aksu et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050273695 Schnurr Dec 2005 A1
20050275656 Corbin et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060015580 Gabriel et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060026294 Virdi et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060026302 Bennett et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060036549 Wu Feb 2006 A1
20060037057 Xu Feb 2006 A1
20060052095 Vazvan Mar 2006 A1
20060053080 Edmonson Mar 2006 A1
20060064605 Giobbi Mar 2006 A1
20060078301 Ikeda et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060093320 Hallberg et al. May 2006 A1
20060120378 Usuki et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060129909 Butt et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060168639 Gan et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060173887 Breitfeld et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060179239 Fluhr Aug 2006 A1
20060181965 Collart Aug 2006 A1
20060235880 Qian Oct 2006 A1
20060245727 Nakano et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060259588 Lerman et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060263056 Lin et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060267986 Bae Nov 2006 A1
20060274835 Hamilton et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060294164 Armangau et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070005333 Setiohardjo et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070031110 Rijckaert Feb 2007 A1
20070033419 Kocher et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070044010 Sull et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070047901 Ando et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070053513 Hoffberg Mar 2007 A1
20070058928 Naito et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070083467 Lindahl et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070083617 Chakrabarti et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070086528 Mauchly et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070100757 Rhoads May 2007 A1
20070133603 Weaver Jun 2007 A1
20070136817 Nguyen Jun 2007 A1
20070140647 Kusunoki et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070154165 Hemmeryckz-Deleersnijder et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070168541 Gupta et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070168542 Gupta et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070178933 Nelson Aug 2007 A1
20070180125 Knowles et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070185982 Nakanowatari et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070192810 Pritchett et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070201695 Saarikivi Aug 2007 A1
20070217339 Zhao Sep 2007 A1
20070217759 Dodd Sep 2007 A1
20070234391 Hunter et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070239839 Buday et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070255940 Ueno Nov 2007 A1
20070271317 Carmel et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070271385 Davis et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070271830 Holt Nov 2007 A1
20070274679 Yahata et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070277219 Toebes et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070277234 Bessonov et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070280298 Hearn et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070288745 Kwan Dec 2007 A1
20070292107 Yahata et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070297422 Matsuo et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080005175 Bourke et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080008455 De Lange et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080043832 Barkley et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080046718 Grab et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080066099 Brodersen et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080066181 Haveson et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080077592 Brodie et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080086456 Rasanen et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080086747 Rasanen et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080101466 Swenson et al. May 2008 A1
20080104633 Noblecourt et al. May 2008 A1
20080120330 Reed et al. May 2008 A1
20080120342 Reed et al. May 2008 A1
20080120389 Bassali et al. May 2008 A1
20080126248 Lee et al. May 2008 A1
20080137541 Agarwal et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080137736 Richardson et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080151817 Fitchett Jun 2008 A1
20080172441 Speicher et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080187283 Takahashi Aug 2008 A1
20080192818 DiPietro et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080195664 Maharajh et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080195744 Bowra et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080201705 Wookey Aug 2008 A1
20080205860 Holtman Aug 2008 A1
20080209534 Keronen et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080240144 Kruse et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080256105 Nogawa et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080263354 Beuque et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080279535 Haque et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080294453 Baird-Smith et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080298358 John et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080310454 Bellwood et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080310496 Fang Dec 2008 A1
20090031220 Tranchant et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090037959 Suh et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090048852 Burns et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090055546 Jung et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090060452 Chaudhri Mar 2009 A1
20090064341 Hartung et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090066839 Jung et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090097644 Haruki Apr 2009 A1
20090132599 Soroushian et al. May 2009 A1
20090132721 Soroushian et al. May 2009 A1
20090132824 Terada et al. May 2009 A1
20090136216 Soroushian et al. May 2009 A1
20090150557 Wormley et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090165148 Frey et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090168795 Segel et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090169181 Priyadarshi et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090172201 Carmel et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090178090 Oztaskent Jul 2009 A1
20090196139 Bates et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090201988 Gazier et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090217317 White et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090226148 Nesvadba et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090228395 Wegner et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090265737 Issa et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090276636 Grab et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090282162 Mehrotra et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090290706 Amini et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090290708 Schneider et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090293116 DeMello Nov 2009 A1
20090303241 Priyadarshi et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090307258 Priyadarshi et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090307267 Chen et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090310933 Lee Dec 2009 A1
20090313544 Wood et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090313564 Rottler et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090316783 Au et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090328124 Khouzam et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090328228 Schnell Dec 2009 A1
20100040351 Toma et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100057928 Kapoor et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100058405 Ramakrishnan et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100074324 Qian et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100074333 Au et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100083322 Rouse Apr 2010 A1
20100094969 Zuckerman et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100095121 Shetty et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100106968 Mori et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100107260 Orrell et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100111192 Graves May 2010 A1
20100138903 Medvinsky Jun 2010 A1
20100142915 McDermott et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100142917 Isaji Jun 2010 A1
20100158109 Dahlby et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100161825 Ronca et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100166060 Ezure et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100186092 Takechi et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100189183 Gu et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100218208 Holden Aug 2010 A1
20100228795 Hahn Sep 2010 A1
20100235472 Sood et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100250532 Soroushian et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100290761 Drake et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100299522 Khambete et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100306249 Hill et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100313225 Cholas et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100313226 Cholas et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100319014 Lockett et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100319017 Cook Dec 2010 A1
20100332595 Fullagar et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110002381 Yang et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110016225 Park et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110047209 Lindholm et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110055585 Lee Mar 2011 A1
20110060808 Martin et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110066673 Outlaw Mar 2011 A1
20110067057 Karaoguz et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110078440 Feng et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110080940 Bocharov Apr 2011 A1
20110082924 Gopalakrishnan Apr 2011 A1
20110096828 Chen et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110107379 Lajoie et al. May 2011 A1
20110116772 Kwon et al. May 2011 A1
20110126191 Hughes et al. May 2011 A1
20110129011 Cilli et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110135090 Chan et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110138018 Raveendran et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110142415 Rhyu Jun 2011 A1
20110145726 Wei et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110149753 Bapst et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110150100 Abadir Jun 2011 A1
20110153785 Minborg et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110153835 Rimac et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110173345 Knox et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110184738 Kalisky et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110191439 Dazzi et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110191803 Baldwin et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110197237 Turner Aug 2011 A1
20110197267 Gravel et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110213827 Kaspar et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110222786 Carmel et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110225302 Park et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110225315 Wexler et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110225417 Maharajh et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110239078 Luby et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110246657 Glow Oct 2011 A1
20110246659 Bouazizi Oct 2011 A1
20110246661 Manzari et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110252118 Pantos et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110264530 Santangelo et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110268178 Park et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110276695 Maldaner et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110283012 Melnyk Nov 2011 A1
20110291723 Hashimoto Dec 2011 A1
20110296048 Knox et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110302319 Ha et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110305273 He et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110314176 Frojdh et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110314500 Gordon Dec 2011 A1
20120005368 Knittle et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120017282 Kang et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120023251 Pyle et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120036365 Kyslov et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120036544 Chen et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120042090 Chen et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120066360 Ghosh Mar 2012 A1
20120093214 Urbach Apr 2012 A1
20120114302 Randall May 2012 A1
20120124191 Lyon May 2012 A1
20120137336 Applegate et al. May 2012 A1
20120144117 Weare et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120144445 Bonta et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120166633 Baumback et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120170642 Braness et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120170643 Soroushian et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120170906 Soroushian et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120170915 Braness et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120173751 Braness et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120177101 van der Schaar Jul 2012 A1
20120179834 van der Schaar et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120201475 Carmel et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120201476 Carmel et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120233345 Hannuksela Sep 2012 A1
20120240176 Ma et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120254455 Adimatyam et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120260277 Kosciewicz Oct 2012 A1
20120263434 Wainner et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120265562 Daouk et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120278496 Hsu Nov 2012 A1
20120289147 Raleigh et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120294355 Holcomb et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120297039 Acuna et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120307883 Graves Dec 2012 A1
20120311094 Biderman et al. Dec 2012 A1
20120311174 Bichot et al. Dec 2012 A1
20120314778 Salustri et al. Dec 2012 A1
20120317235 Nguyen et al. Dec 2012 A1
20120331167 Hunt Dec 2012 A1
20130007223 Luby et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130013730 Li et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130013803 Bichot et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130019107 Grab et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130019273 Ma et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130041808 Pham et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130044821 Braness et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130046849 Wolf Feb 2013 A1
20130046902 Villegas Nuñez et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130051554 Braness et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130054958 Braness et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130055084 Soroushian et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130058480 Ziskind et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130061040 Kiefer et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130061045 Kiefer et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130064466 Carmel et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130066838 Singla et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130094565 Yang et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130097309 Ma et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130114944 Soroushian et al. May 2013 A1
20130124859 Pestoni et al. May 2013 A1
20130128962 Rajagopalan et al. May 2013 A1
20130152767 Katz et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130166580 Maharajh Jun 2013 A1
20130166765 Kaufman Jun 2013 A1
20130166906 Swaminathan et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130170561 Hannuksela Jul 2013 A1
20130170764 Carmel et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130173513 Chu et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130179199 Ziskind et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130179992 Ziskind et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130182952 Carmel et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130196292 Brennen et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130212228 Butler Aug 2013 A1
20130223812 Rossi Aug 2013 A1
20130226578 Bolton et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130226635 Fisher Aug 2013 A1
20130227081 Luby et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130227122 Gao Aug 2013 A1
20130301424 Kotecha et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130311670 Tarbox et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130329781 Su et al. Dec 2013 A1
20140003516 Soroushian Jan 2014 A1
20140019593 Reznik et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140037620 Ferree et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140052823 Gavade et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140059156 Freeman, II et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140096171 Shivadas et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140101722 Moore Apr 2014 A1
20140115650 Zhang et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140119432 Wang et al. May 2014 A1
20140140253 Lohmar et al. May 2014 A1
20140140396 Wang et al. May 2014 A1
20140140417 Shaffer et al. May 2014 A1
20140143301 Watson et al. May 2014 A1
20140143431 Watson et al. May 2014 A1
20140143440 Ramamurthy et al. May 2014 A1
20140177734 Carmel et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140189065 van der Schaar et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140201382 Shivadas et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140211840 Butt et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140211859 Carmel et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140241420 Orton-jay et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140241421 Orton-jay et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140247869 Su et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140250473 Braness et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140258714 Grab Sep 2014 A1
20140269927 Naletov et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140269936 Shivadas et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140280763 Grab et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140297804 Shivadas et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140297881 Shivadas et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140355668 Shoham et al. Dec 2014 A1
20140359678 Shivadas et al. Dec 2014 A1
20140359679 Shivadas et al. Dec 2014 A1
20140359680 Shivadas et al. Dec 2014 A1
20140376720 Chan et al. Dec 2014 A1
20150006662 Braness Jan 2015 A1
20150026677 Stevens et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150049957 Shoham et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150063693 Carmel et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150067715 Koat et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150104153 Braness et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150117836 Amidei et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150117837 Amidei et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150139419 Kiefer et al. May 2015 A1
20150188758 Amidei et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150188842 Amidei et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150188921 Amidei et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150189017 Amidei et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150189373 Amidei et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150288996 Van Der Schaar et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150334435 Shivadas et al. Nov 2015 A1
20150373421 Chan et al. Dec 2015 A1
20160070890 Grab et al. Mar 2016 A1
20160112382 Kiefer et al. Apr 2016 A1
20160149981 Shivadas et al. May 2016 A1
20160219303 Braness et al. Jul 2016 A1
20170214947 Kiefer et al. Jul 2017 A1
20170280203 Chan et al. Sep 2017 A1
20180007451 Shivadas et al. Jan 2018 A1
20180131980 Van Der Schaar et al. May 2018 A1
20180220153 Braness et al. Aug 2018 A1
20190020907 Kiefer et al. Jan 2019 A1
20190045234 Kiefer et al. Feb 2019 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (147)
Number Date Country
2010203605 May 2015 AU
1169229 Dec 1997 CN
1221284 Jun 1999 CN
1723696 Jan 2006 CN
757484 Feb 1997 EP
813167 Dec 1997 EP
0936812 Aug 1999 EP
1056273 Nov 2000 EP
1187483 Mar 2002 EP
1420580 May 2004 EP
1553779 Jul 2005 EP
1657835 May 2006 EP
1718074 Nov 2006 EP
2486517 Aug 2012 EP
2486727 Aug 2012 EP
2507995 Oct 2012 EP
2564354 Mar 2013 EP
2616991 Jul 2013 EP
2617192 Jul 2013 EP
2661696 Nov 2013 EP
2661875 Nov 2013 EP
2661895 Nov 2013 EP
2486727 Mar 2014 EP
2564354 Mar 2014 EP
2616991 Mar 2014 EP
2617192 Mar 2014 EP
2716048 Apr 2014 EP
2721826 Apr 2014 EP
2486517 Jun 2014 EP
2751990 Jul 2014 EP
2807821 Dec 2014 EP
2751990 Apr 2015 EP
EP2360923 Aug 2011 FR
08046902 Feb 1996 JP
08111842 Apr 1996 JP
08163488 Jun 1996 JP
08287613 Nov 1996 JP
09037225 Feb 1997 JP
11164307 Jun 1999 JP
11275576 Oct 1999 JP
11328929 Nov 1999 JP
2000201343 Jul 2000 JP
02001043668 Feb 2001 JP
2001209726 Aug 2001 JP
2001346165 Dec 2001 JP
2002164880 Jun 2002 JP
2002170363 Jun 2002 JP
2002518898 Jun 2002 JP
2002218384 Aug 2002 JP
2003179597 Jun 2003 JP
2003250113 Sep 2003 JP
2004013823 Jan 2004 JP
2004515941 May 2004 JP
2004172830 Jun 2004 JP
2004187161 Jul 2004 JP
2004234128 Aug 2004 JP
2005027153 Jan 2005 JP
2005080204 Mar 2005 JP
2006155500 Jun 2006 JP
2006524007 Oct 2006 JP
2007036666 Feb 2007 JP
2007174375 Jul 2007 JP
2007235690 Sep 2007 JP
2007535881 Dec 2007 JP
2008235999 Oct 2008 JP
2009530917 Aug 2009 JP
2013513298 Apr 2013 JP
5200204 Jun 2013 JP
2014506430 Mar 2014 JP
5723888 May 2015 JP
2015167357 Sep 2015 JP
6038805 Dec 2016 JP
6078574 Feb 2017 JP
2017063453 Mar 2017 JP
100221423 Sep 1999 KR
2002013664 Feb 2002 KR
1020020064888 Aug 2002 KR
100669616 Jan 2007 KR
1020130133830 Dec 2013 KR
101874907 Jul 2018 KR
146026 Dec 2010 SG
1995015660 Jun 1995 WO
1996013121 May 1996 WO
1997031445 Apr 1998 WO
1999010836 Mar 1999 WO
1999065239 Dec 1999 WO
0104892 Jan 2001 WO
2001031497 May 2001 WO
2001050732 Jul 2001 WO
2001065762 Sep 2001 WO
2002001880 Jan 2002 WO
2002008948 Jan 2002 WO
2002035832 May 2002 WO
2002037210 May 2002 WO
2002054196 Jul 2002 WO
2003030000 Apr 2003 WO
2003047262 Jun 2003 WO
2003096136 Nov 2003 WO
2004054247 Jun 2004 WO
2004097811 Nov 2004 WO
2004102571 Nov 2004 WO
2006018843 Feb 2006 WO
20060012398 Feb 2006 WO
2006018843 Dec 2006 WO
2007044590 Apr 2007 WO
2007113836 Oct 2007 WO
2008010275 Jan 2008 WO
2008042242 Apr 2008 WO
2008086313 Jul 2008 WO
2007113836 Nov 2008 WO
2008135932 Nov 2008 WO
2007113836 Dec 2008 WO
2009065137 May 2009 WO
2010060106 May 2010 WO
2010080911 Jul 2010 WO
2010089962 Aug 2010 WO
2010108053 Sep 2010 WO
2010111261 Sep 2010 WO
2010122447 Oct 2010 WO
2010147878 Dec 2010 WO
2011042898 Apr 2011 WO
2011042900 Apr 2011 WO
2011068668 Jun 2011 WO
2011101371 Aug 2011 WO
2011103364 Aug 2011 WO
2011132184 Oct 2011 WO
2011135558 Nov 2011 WO
2012035533 Mar 2012 WO
2012035534 Mar 2012 WO
2012035534 Jul 2012 WO
2012094171 Jul 2012 WO
20120094181 Jul 2012 WO
20120094189 Jul 2012 WO
2012035533 Aug 2012 WO
2012162806 Dec 2012 WO
2012171113 Dec 2012 WO
2013030833 Mar 2013 WO
2013032518 Mar 2013 WO
2013103986 Jul 2013 WO
2013111126 Aug 2013 WO
2013032518 Sep 2013 WO
2013144942 Oct 2013 WO
2014145901 Sep 2014 WO
2014193996 Dec 2014 WO
2014193996 Feb 2015 WO
2015031982 Mar 2015 WO
2013111126 Jun 2015 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (249)
Entry
“IBM Closes Cryptolopes Unit,” Dec. 17, 1997, CNET News, Printed on Apr. 25, 2014 from http://news.cnet.com/IBM-closes-Cryptolopes-unit/2100-1001_3206465.html, 3 pgs.
“Information Technology—Coding of Audio Visual Objects—Part 2: Visual” International Standard, ISO/IEC 14496-2, Third Edition, Jun. 1, 2004, pp. 1-724. (presented in three parts).
U.S. Appl. No. 13/905,804, “Notice of Allowance,” dated Aug. 12, 2015, 8 pgs.
Broadq—The Ultimate Home Entertainment Software, printed May 11, 2009 from ittp://web.srchive.org/web/20030401122010/www.broadq.com/qcasttuner/, 1 page.
Cloakware Corporation, “Protecting Digital Content Using Cloakware Code Transformation Technology”, Version 1.2, May 2002, pp. 1-10.
EP11774529 Supplementary European Search Report, completed Jan. 31, 2014, 2 pgs.
European Search Report Application No. EP 08870152, Search Completed May 19, 2011, dated May 26, 2011, 9 pgs.
European Search Report for Application 11855103.5, search completed Jun. 26, 2014, 9 pgs.
European Search Report for Application 11855237.1, search completed Jun. 12, 2014, 9 pgs.
European Supplementary Search Report for Application EP09759600, completed Jan. 25, 2011, 11 pgs.
Extended European Search Report for European Application EP10821672, completed Jan. 30, 2014, 3 pgs.
Extended European Search Report for European Application EP11824682, completed Feb. 6, 2014, 4 pgs.
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 14763140.2, Search completed Sep. 26, 2016, dated Oct. 5, 2016, 9 pgs.
Federal Computer Week, “Tool Speeds Info to Vehicles”, Jul. 25, 1999, 5 pgs.
Final draft ETSI ES 202 109, V1.1.1, ETSI Standard, Terrestrial Trunked Radio (TETRA); Security; Synchronization mechanism for end-to-end encryption, Oct. 2002, 17 pgs.
HTTP Live Streaming Overview, Networking & Internet, Apple, Inc., Apr. 1, 2011, 38 pgs.
IBM Corporation and Microsoft Corporation, “Multimedia Programming Interface and Data Specifications 1.0”, Aug. 1991, printed from http://www.kk.iij4u.or.jp/˜kondo/wave/mpidata.txt on Mar. 6, 2006, 100 pgs.
InformationWeek, “Internet on Wheels”, InformationWeek: Front End: Daily Dose, Jul. 20, 1999, Printed on Mar. 26, 2014, 3 pgs.
Adzic et al, “Optimized Adaptive HTTP Streaming for Mobile Devices”, International Society for Optics and Photonics, Applications of Digital Image Processing XXXIV, vol. 8135, Sep. 2011, 10 pgs.
Akhshabi et al., “An Experimental Evaluation of Rate-Adaptation Algorithms in Adaptive Streaming over HTTP”, MMSys'11, Feb. 23-25, 2011, 12 pgs.
Anonymous, “Method for the encoding of a compressed video sequence derived from the same video sequence compressed at a different bit rate without loss of data”, ip.com, ip.com No. IPCOM000008165D, May 22, 2002, pp. 1-9.
Author Unknown, “Blu-ray Disc—Blu-ray Disc—Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia”, printed Oct. 30, 2008 from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blu-ray_Disc, 11 pgs.
Author Unknown, “Blu-ray Movie Bitrates Here—Blu-ray Forum”, printed Oct. 30, 2008 from http://forum.blu-ray.com/showthread.php?t=3338, 6 pgs.
Author Unknown, “MPEG-4 Video Encoder: Based on International Standard ISO/IEC 14496-2”, Patni Computer Systems, Ltd., printed Jan. 24, 2007, USA, pp. 1-15.
Author Unknown, “O'Reilly—802.11 Wireless Networks: The Definitive Guide, Second Edition”, printed Oct. 30, 2008 from http://oreilly.com/catalog/9780596100520, 2 pgs.
Author Unknown, “Tunneling QuickTime RTSP and RTP over HTTP”, Published by Apple Computer, Inc.: 1999 (month unknown) 6 pgs.
Author Unknown, “Turbo-Charge Your Internet and PC Performance”, printed Oct. 30, 2008 from Speedtest.net—The Global Broadband Speed Test, 1 page.
Author Unknown, “White paper, The New Mainstream Wireless LAN Standard”, Broadcom Corporation, Jul. 2003, 12 pgs.
Blasiak, “Video Transrating and Transcoding: Overview of Video Transrating and Transcoding Technologies”, Ingenient Technologies, TI Developer Conference, Aug. 6-8, 2002, 22 pgs.
Bloom et al., “Copy Protection for DVD Video”, Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 87, No. 7, Jul. 1999, pp. 1267-1276.
Bocharov et al., “Portable encoding of audio-video objects: The Protected Interoperable File Format (PIFF)”, Microsoft Corporation, Sep. 8, 2009, Revised: Mar. 9, 2010, 32 pgs.
Bross et al., “High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC) text specification draft 10 (for FDIS & Last Call)”, Joint Collaborative Team on Video Coding (JCT-VC) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11, Document: JCTVC-L1003_v34, 12th Meeting: Geneva, CH, Jan. 14-23, 2013. (presented in three parts).
Casares, Juan et al. “Simplifying Video Editing Using Metadata”, pp. 157-166.
Concolato et al., “Live HTTP Streaming of Video and Subtitles within a Browser”, MMSys 2013, Feb. 26-Mar. 1, 2013, Oslo, Norway, 5 pgs.
Deutscher, “IIS Transform Manager Beta—Using the MP4 to Smooth Task”, Retrieved from: https://web.archive.org/web/20130328111303/http://blog.johndeutscher.com/category/smooth-streaming, Blog post of Apr. 29, 2011, 14 pgs.
Eskicioglu et al., “An Integrated Approach to Encrypting Scalable Video”, Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo, Aug. 26-29, 2002, Lausanne, Switzerland, 4 pgs.
Fecheyr-Lippens, “A Review of HTTP Live Streaming”, Internet Citation, Jan. 25, 2010, 38 pgs.
Gannes, “The Lowdown on Apple's HTTP Adaptive Bitrate Streaming”, GigaOM, Jun. 10, 2009, 12 pgs.
Garg et al., “An Experimental Study of Throughput for UDP and VoIP Traffic in IEEE 802.11b Networks”, Wireless Communications and Networkings, Mar. 2003, pp. 1748-1753.
Gast, “When is 54 Not Equal to 54? A Look at 802.11a, b and g Throughput”, Aug. 8, 2003, printed Oct. 30, 2008 from www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/wireless/2003/08/08/wireless_throughput.html, 4 pgs.
Ghosh, “Enhancing Silverlight Video Experiences with Contextual Data”, Retrieved from: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/ee336025.aspx, 2010, 15 pgs.
Griffith, Eric “The Wireless Digital Picture Frame Arrives”, Wi-Fi Planet, printed May 4, 2007 from http://www.wi-fiplanet.com/news/article.php/3093141, Oct. 16, 2003, 3 pgs.
Hartung et al., “DRM Protected Dynamic Adaptive HTTP Streaming”, MMSys 2011 Proceedings of the Second Annual ACM Conference on Multimedia Systems, San Jose, California, Feb. 23-25, 2011, pp. 277-282.
Hurtado Guzman, Juan Esteban “Development and Implementation of an Adaptive HTTP Streaming Framework for H264/MVC Coded Media”, Politecnico di Torino, Nov. 2010, 108 pgs.
Hwang et al., “Efficient and User Friendly Inter-domain Device Authentication/Access control for Home Networks”, Proceedings of the 2006 International Conference on Embedded and Ubiquitous Computing, Seoul, Korea, Aug. 1-4, 2006, 10 pgs.
Inlet Technologies, “Adaptive Delivery to iDevices”, 2010, 2 pgs.
Inlet Technologies, “Adaptive delivery to iPhone 3.0”, 2009, 2 pgs.
Inlet Technologies, “HTTP versus RTMP”, 2009, 3 pgs.
Inlet Technologies, “The World's First Live Smooth Streaming Event: The French Open”, 2009, 2 pgs.
I-O Data, “Innovation of technology arrived”, from http://www.iodata.com/catalogs/AVLP2DVDLA_Flyer200505.pdf, 2 pgs.
Kaspar et al., “Using HTTP Pipelining to Improve Progressive Download over Multiple Heterogeneous Interfaces”, IEEE ICC proceedings, 2010, 5 pgs.
Kim, Kyuheon “MPEG-2 ES/PES/TS/PSI”, Kyung-Hee University, Oct. 4, 2010, 66 pgs.
Kozintsev et al., “Improving last-hop multicast streaming video over 802.11”, Workshop on Broadband Wireless Multimedia, Oct. 2004, 10 pgs.
Kurzke et al., “Get Your Content Onto Google TV”, Google, Retrieved from: http://commondatastorage.googleapis.com/io2012/presentations/live%20to%20website/1300.pdf, 2012, 58 pgs.
Lang, “Expression Encoder, Best Practices for live smooth streaming broadcasting”, Microsoft Corporation, 2010, retrieved from http://www.streamingmedia.com/conferences/west2010/presentations/SMWest-12010-Expression-Encoder.pdf, 20 pgs.
Levkov, “Mobile Encoding Guidelines for Android Powered Devices”, Adobe Systems Inc., Addendum B, Dec. 22, 2010, 42 pgs.
Li et al, “Content-Aware Playout and Packet Scheduling for Video Streaming Over Wireless Links”, IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, vol. 10, No. 5, Aug. 2008, pp. 885-895.
Lian et al., “Efficient video encryption scheme based on advanced video coding”, Multimed. Tools Appl. vol. 38, 2008, pp. 75-89.
Liu et al., “A Formal Framework for Component Deployment”, OOPSLA 2006, Proceedings of the 21st Annual ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Object-Oriented Programming Systems, Language, and Applications, Portland, Oregon, Oct. 22-26, 2006, 19 pgs.
Long et al., “Silver: Simplifying Video Editing with Metadata”, CHI 2003: New Horizons, Apr. 5-10, 2003, pp. 628-629.
Matroska, “Diagram”, Matroska, Technical/Info, Diagram, 2016, retrieved from https://www.matroska.org/technical/diagram/index.html on Jul. 20, 2017, 9 pgs.
Matroska, “Specifications”, Matroska, Technical/Info, Specifications, Jun. 25, 2017, retrieved from https://www.matroska.org/technical/specs/index.html on Jul. 20, 2017, 20 pgs.
Miras, “On Quality Aware Adaptation of Internet Video”, University of London, PhD dissertation, 2004, 181 pgs.
Morrison, “EA IFF 85 Standard for Interchange Format Files”, Jan. 14, 1985, printed from http://www.dcs.ed.ac.uk/home/mxr/gfx/2d/IFF.txt on Mar. 6, 2006, 24 pgs.
Moscoso, Pedro Gomes “Interactive Internet TV Architecture Based on Scalable Video Coding”, Instituto Superior Techico, Universidad Technica de Lisboa, May 2011, 103 pgs.
MSDN, “Adaptive streaming, Expression Studio 2.0”, Apr. 23, 2009, 2 pgs.
Nelson, “Smooth Streaming Deployment Guide”, Microsoft Expression Encoder, Aug. 2010, 66 pgs.
Nelson, Mark “Arithmetic Coding + Statistical Modeling = Data Compression: Part 1—Arithmetic Coding”, Doctor Dobb's Journal, Feb. 1991, printed from http://www.dogma.net/markn/articles/arith/part1.htm; printed Jul. 2, 2003, 12 pgs.
Nelson, Michael “IBM's Cryptolopes”, Complex Objects in Digital Libraries Course, Spring 2001, Retrieved from http://www.cs.odu.edu/˜mln/teaching/unc/in1s210/?method=display&pkg_name=cryptolopes.pkg&element_name=cryptolopes.ppt, 12 pgs.
Noboru, “Play Fast and Fine Video on Web! codec”, Co.9 No. 12, Dec. 1, 2003, 2 pgs.
Noe, A. “Matroska File Format (under construction!)”, Retrieved from the Internet: URL:http://web.archive.orgweb/20070821155146/www.matroska.org/technical/specs/matroska.pdf [retrieved on Jan. 19, 2011], Jun. 24, 2007, pp. 1-51.
Noe, Alexander “AVI File Format”, http://www.alexander-noe.com/video/documentation/avi.pdf, Dec. 14, 2006, pp. 1-26.
Noe, Alexander “Definitions”, Apr. 11, 2006, retrieved from http://www.alexander-noe.com/video/amg/definitions.html on Oct. 16, 2013, 2 pgs.
Ooyala, “Widevine Content Protection”, Ooyala Support Center for Developers. Ooyala, Inc., 2013. Jun. 3, 2013. http://support.ooyala.com/developers/documentation/concepts/player_v3_widevine_integration.html 7 pgs.
Oyman et al, “Quality of Experience for HTTP Adaptive Streaming Services”, IEEE Communications Magazine, Apr. 2012, vol. 50, No. 4, DOI: 10.1109/MCOM.2012.6178830, pp. 20-27.
Ozer, “The 2012 Encoding and Transcoding Buyers' Guide”, Streamingmedia.com, Retrieved from: http://www.streamingmedia.com/Articles/Editorial/Featured-Articles/The-2012-Encoding-and-Transcoding-Buyers-Guide-84210.aspx, 2012, 8 pgs.
Ozer, Jan “Adaptive Streaming in the Field”, Streaming Media, Dec. 2010-Jan. 2011, pp. 36-47.
Padiadpu, Rashmi “Towards Mobile Learning: A SCORM Player for the Google Android Platform”, Master Thesis, Hamburg University of Applied Sciences, 2008, 66 pgs.
Pantos, “HTTP Live Streaming, draft-pantos-http-live-streaming-10”, IETF Tools, Oct. 15, 2012, Retrieved from: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-pantos-http-live-streaming-10, 37 pgs.
Pantos, R “HTTP Live Streaming: draft-pantos-http-live-streaming-06”, Published by the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), Mar. 31, 2011, 24 pgs.
Papagiannaki et al., “Experimental Characterization of Home Wireless Networks and Design Implications”, INFOCOM 2006, 25th IEEE International Conference of Computer Communications, Proceedings, Apr. 2006, 13 pgs.
Peek, David “Consumer Distributed File Systems”, Dissertation, Doctor of Philosophy, Computer Science and Engineering, The University of Michigan, 2009, 118 pgs.
Phamdo, “Theory of Data Compression”, printed on Oct. 10, 2003, 12 pgs.
RGB Networks, “Comparing Adaptive HTTP Streaming Technologies”, Nov. 2011, Retrieved from: http://btreport.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/RGB-Adaptive-HTTP-Streaming-Comparison-1211-01.pdf, 20 pgs.
Rosenberg et al., “Indicating User Agent Capabilities in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)”, Network Working Group, RFC 3840, Aug. 2004, 36 pgs.
Schulzrinne, H “Real Time Streaming Protocol 2.0 (RTSP): draft-ietfmmusic-rfc2326bis-27”, MMUSIC Working Group of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), Mar. 9, 2011, 296 pgs. (presented in two parts).
Siglin, “HTTP Streaming: What You Need to Know”, streamingmedia.com, 2010, 15 pgs.
Siglin, “Unifying Global Video Strategies, MP4 File Fragmentation for Broadcast, Mobile and Web Delivery”, Nov. 16, 2011, 16 pgs.
Silvia, “adaptive HTTP streaming for open codecs”, Oct. 9, 2010, [retrieved on: Mar. 2, 2018, 15 pgs.
Tan, Yap-Peng et al., “Video transcoding for fast forward/reverse video playback”, IEEE ICIP, 2002, 4 pgs.
Taxan, “AVel LinkPlayer2 for Consumer”, I-O Data USA—Products—Home Entertainment, printed May 4, 2007 from http://www.iodata.com/usa/products/products.php?cat=HNP&sc=AVEL&pld=AVLP2/DVDLA&ts=2&tsc, 1 page.
Tripathi et al, “Improving Multimedia Streaming with Content-Aware Video Scaling”, Retrieved from: http://digitalcommons.wpi.edu/computerscience-pubs/96, 2001, 17 pgs.
Unknown, “AVI RIFF File Reference (Direct X 8.1 C++ Archive)”, printed from http://msdn.microsoft.com/archive/en-us/dx81_c/direct_cpp/htm/avirifffilereference.asp?fr on Mar. 6, 2006, 7 pgs.
Unknown, “Entropy and Source Coding (Compression)”, TCOM 570, Sep. 1999, pp. 1-22.
Venkatramani et al., “Securing Media for Adaptive Streaming”, Multimedia 2003 Proceedings of the Eleventh ACM International Conference on Multimedia, Nov. 2-8, 2003, Berkeley, California, 4 pgs.
Wang et al., “Image Quality Assessment: From Error Visibility to Structural Similarity”, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, Apr. 2004, vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 600-612.
Wu, Feng et al., “Next Generation Mobile Multimedia Communications: Media Codec and Media Transport Perspectives”, In China Communications, Oct. 2006, pp. 30-44.
Zambelli, “IIS Smooth Streaming Technical Overview”, Microsoft Corporation, Mar. 2009, 17 pgs.
International Preliminary Report for Application No. PCT/US2011/066927, Filed Dec. 22, 2011, Report dated Jul. 10, 2013, 13 pgs.
International Preliminary Report for International Application No. PCT/US2011/067243, International Filing Date Dec. 23, 2011, dated Jul. 10, 2013, 7 pgs.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US14/30747, Report dated Sep. 15, 2015, dated Sep. 24, 2015, 6 pgs.
International Preliminary report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2005/025845, report dated Jun. 19, 2007, 1 page.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2007/063950, Report Completed Dec. 18, 2009, 3 pgs.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2008/083816, dated May 18, 2010, 6 pgs.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2010/56733, dated Jun. 5, 2012, 5 pgs.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2011/068276, dated Mar. 4, 2014, 23 pgs.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2011/067167, dated Feb. 25, 2014, 8 pgs.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2013/043181, dated Dec. 31, 2014, dated Jan. 8, 2015, 11 pgs.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2014/039852, dated Dec. 1, 2015, dated Dec. 5, 2015, 8 pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US07/63950, completed Feb. 19, 2008; dated Mar. 19, 2008, 9 pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US08/87999, completed Feb. 7, 2009, dated Mar. 19, 2009, 6 pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US09/46588, completed Jul. 13, 2009, dated Jul. 23, 2009, 7 pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2004/041667, Completed May 24, 2007, dated Jun. 20, 2007, 6 pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2005/025845, completed Feb. 5, 2007 and dated May 10, 2007, 6 pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2008/083816, completed Jan. 10, 2009, dated Jan. 22, 2009, 7 pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2010/020372, Completed Feb. 10, 2009, dated Mar. 1, 2010, 7 pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2010/56733, Completed Jan. 3, 2011, dated Jan. 14, 2011, 9 pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2011/067243, International Filing Date Dec. 23, 2011, Search Completed Apr. 24, 2012, dated May 8, 2012, 8 pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2013/043181, completed Nov. 27, 2013, dated Dec. 6, 2013, 12 pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US14/30747, completed Jul. 30, 2014, dated Aug. 22, 2014, 7 pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US14/39852, completed Oct. 21, 2014, dated Dec. 5, 2014, 11 pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US2011/066927, completed Apr. 3, 2012, dated Apr. 20, 2012, 14 pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US2011/067167, completed Jun. 19, 2012, dated Jul. 2, 2012, 11 pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US2011/068276, completed Jun. 19, 2013, dated Jul. 8, 2013, 24 pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2013/020572, International Filing Date Jan. 7, 2013, Search Completed Mar. 19, 2013, dated Apr. 29, 2013, 10 pgs.
International Telecommunication Union, Telecommunication Standardization Sector of ITU, H.233, Line Transmission of Non-Telephone Signals, Confidentiality System for Audiovisual Services, ITU-T Recommendation H.233, Mar. 1993, 18 pgs.
ITS International, “Fleet System Opts for Mobile Server”, Aug. 26, 1999, Printed on Oct. 21, 2011 from http://www.itsinternational.com/News/article.cfm?recordID=547, 2 pgs.
Lifehacker—Boxqueue Bookmarklet Saves Videos for Later Boxee Watching, printed Jun. 16, 2009 from http://feeds.gawker.com/˜r/lifehacker/full/˜3/OHvDmrlgZZc/boxqueue-bookmarklet-saves-videos-for-late-boxee-watching, 2 pgs.
Linksys Wireless-B Media Adapter Reviews, printed May 4, 2007 from http://reviews.cnet.com/Linksys_Wireless_B_Media_Adapter/4505-6739_7-30421900.html?tag=box, 5 pgs.
Linksys, KISS DP-500, printed May 4, 2007 from http://www.kiss-technology.com/?p=dp500, 1 page.
Linksys® : “Enjoy your digital music and pictures on your home entertainment center, without stringing wires!”, Model No. WMA 11B, printed May 9, 2007 from http://www.linksys.com/servlet/Satellite?c=L_Product_C2&childpagename=US/Layout&cid=1115416830950&p, 4 pgs.
Microsoft Corporation, “Chapter 8, Multimedia File Formats” 1991, Microsoft Windows Multimedia Programmer's Reference, 23 pgs.
Microsoft Media Platform: Player Framework, “Microsoft Media Platform: Player Framework v2.5 (formerly Silverlight Media Framework)”, May 3, 2011, 2 pgs.
Microsoft Media Platform: Player Framework, “Silverlight Media Framework v1.1”, Jan. 2010, 2 pgs.
Microsoft Windows® XP Media Center Edition 2005, Frequently asked Questions, printed May 4, 2007 from http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/mediacenter/evaluation/faq.mspx, 6 pgs.
Microsoft Windows® XP Media Center Edition 2005: Features, printed May 9, 2007, from http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/mediacenter/evaluation/features.mspx, 4 pgs.
Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. CN200880127596.4, dated May 6, 2014, 8 pgs.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/223,210, dated Apr. 30, 2015, 14 pgs.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/564,003, dated Apr. 17, 2015, 28 pgs.
Open DML AVI-M-JPEG File Format Subcommittee, “Open DML AVI File Format Extensions”, Version 1.02, Feb. 28, 1996, 29 pgs.
PC world.com, Future Gear: PC on the HiFi, and the TV, from http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,108818-page,1/article.html, printed May 4, 2007, from IDG Networks, 2 pgs.
Qtv—About BroadQ, printed May 11, 2009 from http://www.broadq.com/en/about.php, 1 page.
Supplementary European Search Report for Application No. EP 04813918, Search Completed Dec. 19, 2012, 3 pgs.
Supplementary European Search Report for Application No. EP 10729513, completed Dec. 9, 2013, 4 pgs.
Supplementary European Search Report for EP Application 11774529, completed Jan. 31, 2014, 2 pgs.
Windows Media Center Extender for Xbox, printed May 9, 2007 from http://www.xbox.com/en-US/support/systemuse/xbox/console/mediacenterextender.htm, 2 pgs.
Windows® XP Media Center Edition 2005, “Experience more entertainment”, retrieved from http://download.microsoft.com/download/c/9/a/c9a7000a-66b3-455b-860b-1c16f2eecfec/MCE.pdf on May 9, 2007, 2 pgs.
Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2004/041667, Filing Date Dec. 8, 2004, Report Completed May 24, 2007, dated Jun. 20, 2007, 4 pgs.
Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2005/025845, completed Feb. 5, 2007 and dated May 10, 2007, 5 pgs.
Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2007/063950 filed Mar. 14, 2007, report completed Mar. 1, 2008; report dated Mar. 19, 2008, 6 pgs.
Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2008/083816, Opinion completed Jan. 10, 2009, dated Jan. 22, 2009, 5 pgs.
Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2009/046588, completed Jul. 14, 2009, dated Jul. 23, 2009, 5 pgs.
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US08/87999, date completed Feb. 7, 2009, dated Mar. 19, 2009, 4 pgs.
Invitation to Pay Add'l Fees Rcvd for International Application PCT/US14/39852, dated Sep. 25, 2 pgs.
3GPP TS 26.247, V1.3.0, 3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects Transparent end-to-end Packet-switches Streaming Services (PSS);, Progressive Download and Dynamic Adaptive Streaming over HTTP (3GP-DASH) (Release 10), Mar. 2011, 72 pgs.
“Adaptive Streaming Comparison”, Jan. 28, 2010, 5 pgs.
“Best Practices for Multi-Device Transcoding”, Kaltura Open Source Video, Printed on Nov. 27, 2013 from knowledge.kaltura.com/best-practices-multi-device-transcoding, 13 pgs.
“Container format (digital)”, printed Aug. 22, 2009 from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Container_format_(digital), 4 pgs.
“Diagram | Matroska”, Dec. 17, 2010, Retrieved from http://web.archive.org/web/201 01217114656/http:I/matroska.org/technical/diagram/index.html on Jan. 29, 2016, Dec. 17, 2010, 5 pgs.
“Draft CR: Trick Mode for HTTP Streaming”, 3GPP TSG-SA4 Meeting #58, Apr. 26-30, 2010, Vancouver, Canada, S4-100237, 3 pgs.
“DVD—MPeg differences”, printed Jul. 2, 2009 from http://dvd.sourceforge.net/dvdinfo/dvdmpeg.html, 1 page.
“DVD subtitles”, sam.zoy.org/writings/dvd/subtitles, dated Jan. 9, 2001, printed Jul. 2, 2009, 4 pgs.
“Final Committee Draft of MPEG-4 streaming text format”, International Organisation for Standardisation, Feb. 2004, 22 pgs.
“IBM Spearheading Intellectual Property Protection Technology for Information on the Internet; Cryptolope Containers Have Arrived”, May 1, 1996, Business Wire, Printed on Aug. 1, 2014 from http://www.thefreelibrary.com/IBM+Spearheading+Intellectual+Property+Protection+Technology+for...-a018239381, 6 pgs.
“Information Technology—Coding of audio-visual objects—Part 14: MP4 file format”, International Standard, ISO/IEC 14496-14, First Edition, Nov. 15, 2003, 18 pgs.
“Information Technology—Coding of audio-visual objects—Part 17: Streaming text”, International Organisation for Standardisation, Feb. 2004, 22 pgs.
“Information technology—Coding of audio-visual objects—Part 18: Font compression and streaming”, ISO/IEC 14496-18, First edition Jul. 1, 2004, 26 pgs.
“Information technology—Generic coding of moving pictures and associated audio information: Systems”, International Standard ISO/IEC 13818-1, Second Edition, Dec. 1, 2000, 174 pgs. (presented in two parts).
“Information-Technology—Generic coding of moving pictures and associated audio: Systems, Recommendation H.222.0”, International Standard, ISO/IEC 13818-1, Draft 1209, Apr. 25, 1995, 151 pgs.
“Information-Technology—Generic coding of moving pictures and associated audio: Systems, Recommendation H.222.0”, International Standard, ISO/IEC 13818-1, Draft 1540, Nov. 13, 1994, 161 pgs.
“Innovation of technology arrived”, I-O Data, Nov. 2004, Retrieved from http://www.iodata.com/catalogs/AVLP2DVDLA_Flyer200505.pdf on May 30, 2013, 2 pgs., I-O Data, 2 pgs.
“KISS Players, KISS DP-500”, retrieved from http://www.kiss-technology.com/?p=dp500 on May 4, 2007, 1 page.
“Matroska”, Wikipedia, Jul. 10, 2017, retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matroska on Jul. 20, 2017, 3 pgs.
“Matroska Streaming | Matroska”, Retrieved from the Internet: URL:http://web.archive.org/web/201 0121711431 O/http://matroska.org/technical!streaming/index.html [retrieved on Jan. 29, 2016], Dec. 17, 2010, 2 pgs.
“MovieLabs Specification for Next Generation Video—Version 1.0”, Motion Picture Laboratories, Inc., 2013, Retrieved from: http://movielabs.com/ngvideo/MovieLabs%20Specification%20for%20Next%20Generation%20Video%20v1.0.pdf, 5 pgs.
“MPEG-2”, Wikipedia, Jun. 13, 2017, retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MPEG-2 on Jul. 20, 2017, 13 pgs.
“MPEG-4 File Format, Version 2”, Sustainability of Digital Formats: Planning for Library of Congress Collections, Retrieved from: https://www.loc.gov/preservation/digital/formats/fdd/fdd000155.shtml, Last updated Feb. 21, 2017, 8 pgs.
“MPEG-4 Part 14”, Wikipedia, Jul. 10, 2017, retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MPEG-4_Part_14 on Jul. 20, 2017, 5 pgs.
“Netflix turns on subtitles for PC, Mac streaming”, Yahoo! News, Apr. 21, 2010, Printed on Mar. 26, 2014, 3 pgs.
“OpenDML AVI File Format Extensions”, OpenDML AVI M-JPEG File Format Subcommittee, retrieved from www.the-labs.com/Video/odmlff2-avidef.pdf, Sep. 1997, 42 pgs.
“OpenDML AVI File Format Extensions Version 1.02”, OpenDMLAVI MJPEG File Format Subcommittee. Last revision: Feb. 28, 1996. Reformatting: Sep. 1997, 42 pgs.
“QCast Tuner for PS2”, printed May 11, 2009 from http://web.archive.org/web/20030210120605/www.divx.com/software/detail.php?ie=39, 2 pgs.
“Series H: Audiovisual and Multimedia Systems Infrastructure of audiovisual services—Coding of moving video; High efficiency video coding”, International Telecommunication Union, ITU-T H.265, Apr. 2015, 634 pgs. (presented in six parts).
“Smooth Streaming Client”, The Official Microsoft IIs Site, Sep. 24, 2010, 4 pgs.
“Specifications | Matroska”, Retrieved from the Internet: URL:http://web.archive.org/web/201 00706041303/http:/1www.matroska.org/technical/specs/index.html [retrieved on Jan. 29, 2016, Jul. 6, 2010, 14 pgs.
“Specifications Matroska”, Dec. 17, 2010, [retrieved on Mar. 2, 2018], 12 pgs.
“Supplementary European Search Report for Application No. EP 10834935”, International Filing Date Nov. 15, 2010, Search Completed May 27, 2014, 9 pgs.
“Supported Media Formats”, Supported Media Formats, Android Developers, Printed on Nov. 27, 2013 from developer.android.com/guide/appendix/media-formats.html, 3 pgs.
“Text of ISO/IEC 14496-18/COR1, Font compression and streaming”, ITU Study Group 16—Video Coding Experts Group—ISO/IEC MPEG & ITU-T VCEG(ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11 and ITU-T SG16 06), No. N8664, Oct. 27, 2006, 8 pgs.
“Text of ISO/IEC 14496-18/FDIS, Coding of Moving Pictures and Audio”, ITU Study Group 16—Videocoding Experts Group—ISO/IEC MPEG & ITU-T VCEG(ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11 and ITU-T SG16 06), No. N6215, Dec. 2003, 26 pgs.
“Thread: SSME (Smooth Streaming Medial Element) config.xml review (Smooth Streaming Client configuration file)”, Printed on Mar. 26, 2014, 3 pgs.
“Transcoding Best Practices”, From movideo, Printed on Nov. 27, 2013 from code.movideo.com/Transcoding_Best_Practices, 5 pgs.
“Using HTTP Live Streaming”, iOS Developer Library, http://developer.apple.com/library/ios/#documentation/networkinginternet/conceptual/streamingmediaguide/UsingHTTPLiveStreaming/UsingHTTPLiveStreaming.html#//apple_ref/doc/uid/TP40008332-CH102-SW1, Feb. 11, 2014, 10 pgs.
“Video Manager and Video Title Set IFO file headers”, printed Aug. 22, 2009 from http://dvd.sourceforge.net/dvdinfo/ifo.htm, 6 pgs.
“What is a DVD?”, printed Aug. 22, 2009 from http://www.videohelp.com/dvd, 8 pgs.
“What is a VOB file”, http://www.mpucoder.com/DVD/vobov.html, printed on Jul. 2, 2009, 2 pgs.
“What's on a DVD?”, printed Aug. 22, 2009 from http://www.doom9.org/dvd-structure.htm, 5 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/224,298, “Final Office Action Received”, dated May 19, 2014, 26 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/905,804, “Non-Final Office Action Received”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/905,804, “Non-Final Office Action Received”, dated Jul. 25, 2014, 15 pgs.
Adams et al, “Will http adaptive streaming become the dominant mode of video delivery in cable networks?”, https://www.nctatechnicalpapers.com/Paper/2011/2011-will-http-adaptive-streaming-become-the-dominant-mode-of-video-delivery-in-cable-networks-, 10 pgs.
Adhikari et al., “Unreeling Netflix: Understanding and Improving Multi-CDN Movie Delivery”, 2012 Proceedings IEEE InfoCom, Mar. 25-30, 2012, Orlando, Florida, 9 pgs.
Declaration of Patrick McDaniel, Ph.D., Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 10,225,588, IPR filed Feb. 15, 2020, 211 pgs.
First Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement, DivX, LLC v. Netflix, Inc., No. 2:19-cv-1602-PSG, Am. Compl. (C.D. Cal Aug. 21, 2019), IPR filed Feb. 15, 2020, 229 pgs.
Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 10,225,588, IPR2020-00558, IPR filed Feb. 15, 2020, 96 pgs.
Power of Attorney—Hulu, LLC (IPR2020-00558), IPR filed Feb. 15, 2020, 4 pgs.
Power of Attorney—Netflix, Inc. (IPR2020-00558), IPR filed Feb. 15, 2020, 4 pgs.
Prosecution File History for U.S. Appl. No. 13/340,623 to Kiefer et al. (“Kiefer”), IPR filed Feb. 15, 2020, 1249 pgs (presented in 6 parts).
Prosecution File History for U.S. Pat. No. 10,225,588, IPR filed Feb. 15, 2020, 2937 pgs (presented in 29 parts).
U.S. Appl. No. 61/530,305, filed Sep. 1, 2011, 6 pgs.
ISO/IEC 14496-12 Information Technology—Coding of Audio-Visual Objects Part 12: ISO Base Media File Format, Oct. 2008.
Server-Side Stream Repackaging (Streaming Video Technologies Panorama, part 2) (Jul. 2011), 10 pgs.
Declaration of Patrick McDaniel, Ph.D., Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 9,184,920, Case No. IPR2020-00511, IPR filed Feb. 6, 2020, 168 pgs.
Defendant Netflix, Inc.'s Invalidity Contentions for U.S. Pat. No. 7,295,673; 8,139,651; 8,472,792; 9,270,720; 9,998,515; 10,212,486; 10,225,588; 9,184,920, DIVX, LLCv. Netflix, Inc. , Case No. 2:19-cv-1602-PSG-DFM, C.D. Cal., Apr. 2, 2020, 148 pgs.
Dynamic Adaptive Streaming over HTTP—Standards and Design Principles (Feb. 2011), 10 pgs.
Information Technology—MPEG Systems Technologies — Part 6 Dynamic Adaptive Streaming Over HTTP (DASH) (Oct. 2010), 10 pgs.
Information Technology—MPEG Systems Technologies—Part 7: Common Encryption in ISO Base Media File Format Files (ISO/IEC 23001-7), Apr. 2015, 24 pgs.
ISO/IEC FCD 23001-6 MPEG systems technologies Part 6: Dynamic adaptive streaming over HTTP (DASH), Jan. 28, 2011, 86 pgs.
MPEG-DASH presentation at Streaming Media West 2011, Nov. 2011, 14 pgs.
Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 9,184,920, IPR2020-00511, IPR filed Feb. 6, 2020, 89 pgs.
Power of Attorney—Netflix, Inc. (IPR2020-00511), IPR filed Feb. 6, 2020, 3 pgs.
Prosecution File History for U.S. Pat. No. 9,184,920, IPR filed Feb. 6, 2020, presented in 24 parts.
Universal Mobile Telecommunications Systems (UMTS); ETSI TS 126 244 V9.4.0 (May 2011) 3GPP TS 26.244 version 9.4.0 Release 9, 58 pgs.
“Apple HTP Live Streaming specification”, Aug. 2017, 60 pgs.
“Delivering Live and On-Demand Smooth Streaming”, Microsoft Silverlight, 2009, 28 pgs.
“HTTP Based Adaptive Streaming over HSPA”, Apr. 2011, 73 pgs.
“HTTP Live Streaming”, Mar. 2011, 24 pgs.
“HTTP Live Streaming”, Sep. 2011, 33 pgs.
“Live and On-Demand Video with Silverlight and IIS Smooth Streaming”, Microsoft Silverlight, Windows Server Internet Information Services 7.0, Feb. 2010, 15 pgs.
“Microsoft Smooth Streaming specification”, Jul. 22, 2013, 56 pgs.
“The MPEG-DASH Standard for Multimedia Streaming Over the Internet”, IEEE MultiMedia, vol. 18, No. 4, 2011, 7 pgs.
Abomhara et al. “Enhancing Selective Encryption for H.264/AVC Using Advanced Encryption Standard”, International Journal of computer Theory and Engineering, Apr. 2010, vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 223-229.
Antoniou et al. “Adaptive Methods for the Transmission of Video Streams in Wireless Networks”, 2015, 50 pgs.
Apostolopoulos et al. “Secure Media Streaming and Secure Transcoding”, Multimedia Security Technologies for Digital Rights Management, 2006, 33 pgs.
Beker et al. “Cipher Systems, the Protection of Communications”, 1982, 40 pgs.
Bocharov et al, Microsoft, Portable Encoding of Audio-Video Objects: The Protected Interoperable File Format (PIFF) (Sep. 2009), 10 pgs.
Chaddha et al. “A Frame-work for Live Multicast of Video Streams over the Internet”, Proceedings of 3rd IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, Sep. 19, 1996, Lausanne, Switzerland, 4 pgs.
Cheng, Partial Encryption for Image and Video Communication (Fall 1998), 10 pgs.
Cheng et al. “Partial encryption of compressed images and videos”, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 48, No. 8, Aug. 2000, 33 pgs.
Cheung et al. “On the Use of Destination Set Grouping to Improve Fairness in Multicast Video Distribution”, Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM'96, Conference on Computer Communications, vol. 2, IEEE, 1996, 23 pgs.
Collet, “Delivering Protected Content, an Approach for Next Generation Mobile Technologies”, Thesis, 2010, 84 pgs.
Fielding et al. “Hypertext Transfer Protocol—HTTP1.1”, Network Working Group, RFC 2616, Jun. 1999, 114 pgs.
Kim et al. “Tree-Based Group Key Agreement”, Feb. 2004, 37 pgs.
Laukens, “Adaptive Streaming—A Brief Tutorial”, EBU Technical Review, 2011, 6 pgs.
Li et al. “Layered Video Multicast with Retransmission (LVMR): Evaluation of Hierarchical Rate Control”, Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM'98, The Conference on Computer Communications. Seventeenth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies. Gateway to the 21st Century, Cat. No. 98, vol. 3, 1998, 26 pgs.
Massoudi et al. “Overview on Selective Encryption of Image and Video: Challenges and Perspectives”, EURASIP Journal on Information Security, Nov. 2008, 18 pgs.
McCanne et al. “Receiver-driven Layered Multicast”, Conference proceedings on Applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communications, Aug. 1996, 14 pgs.
Timmerer et al. “HTTP Streaming of MPEG Media”, Proceedings of Streaming Day, 2010, 10 pgs.
Trappe et al., “Key Management and Distribution for Secure Multimedia Multicast”, IEEE Transaction on Multimedia, vol. 5, No. 4, Dec. 2003, pp. 544-557.
Decision Granting Institution of Inter Partes Review 35 U.S.C. § 314, IPR2020-00558, U.S. Pat. No. 10,225,588, 46 pgs.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20180060543 A1 Mar 2018 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60782215 Mar 2006 US
Continuations (5)
Number Date Country
Parent 14928746 Oct 2015 US
Child 15791265 US
Parent 14183360 Feb 2014 US
Child 14928746 US
Parent 13489409 Jun 2012 US
Child 14183360 US
Parent 12411271 Mar 2009 US
Child 13489409 US
Parent 11685929 Mar 2007 US
Child 12411271 US