Many computer users subscribe to feeds from network sources. These feeds provide news, blog entries, lists, media, and the like. A user's local computer presents these feeds so that the user can consume the feeds' contents, such as read the news or see a blog entry. But applications that present feeds often provide users with a consuming experience having significant drawbacks.
System(s) and/or method(s) (“tools”) are described that present content in a user interface tailored to trait(s) of the content. The tools can analyze content to determine its traits, classify the content based on its traits, and present the content in a user interface tailored to the classification. The tools can also organize content items into groups based on a common trait and enable a user to select content items through their group. Responsive to the user's selection of a group, the tools can present content, render enclosures, and alter traits of the content items in the group.
This Summary is provided to introduce a selection of concepts in a simplified form that are further described below in the Detailed Description. This Summary is not intended to identify key or essential features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended to be used as an aid in determining the scope of the claimed subject matter.
The same numbers are used throughout the disclosure and figures to reference like components and features.
The following document describes tools that present content in a user interface tailored to traits of the content. In one embodiment, the tools organize content items into groups based on the content items having a common trait and enable a user to select content items by their group. Responsive to the user's selection of a group, the tools can present content, render enclosures, and alter traits of content items in the selected group.
Before describing the tools in detail, the following discussion of an exemplary operating environment is provided to assist the reader in understanding where and how the tools may be employed. The description provided below constitutes but one example and is not intended to limit application of the tools to any one particular operating environment.
Computer-readable media 112 comprises instructions that implement a feed application 116 having a feed user interface 118, an email application 120 having an email user interface 122, a media application 124, and a photo application 126. The feed application is capable of receiving feeds, such as from network feeds 128, and presenting content of those feeds. The email application is capable of receiving email, such as from network email 130, and presenting the email content. The media application is capable of rendering audio and video content. The photo application is capable of rendering visual content.
Network computer-readable media 114 comprises the network feeds and network email, both of which are capable of sending content across network 104 to computer 102.
Presenting Feed Content
The following discussion describes an exemplary process 200 for presenting feed content in a user interface tailored to the content's traits. This process is illustrated in
Block 202 receives a feed, such as from network feeds 128 across network 104. In some cases these feeds are markup language files, such as files written in eXtensible Markup Language (XML). Feed content is a set of items that can comprise links, text, inline photos, enclosures (e.g., a link to an associated file), and a list of more items, to name a few. A feed from Yahoo!™ News for instance, may predominantly comprise links to news articles.
Block 204 analyzes a feed's content for its traits. Block 204 can determine the content's structural and media traits, such as whether or not the feed content is primarily links, text, inline photos, enclosed media, and the like.
In one embodiment, feed application 116 analyzes a feed's content to determine whether the content has multiple short pieces of text, text without viewable markup language, text with viewable markup language (e.g., HyperText Markup Language—HTML), enclosures, and comments. To do so, the feed application can determine whether or not a feed's content has a description field less than 100 characters (or no description field), a description field having more than 100 characters without HTML, a description field having CDATA including HTML, enclosures (e.g., photo, audio, and video enclosures), and trackbacks or comments, respectively. Block 204 can also determine which trait or traits are dominant in a feed's content.
Block 206 determines a classification to which the feed's content is suited based on its traits. Here feed application 116 compares the traits of the content with five predetermined classifications. The five classifications are: link; text; formatted text; enclosed media; and conversations. These classifications are assigned based on the traits of the content or, in some cases, based on a user's or feed source's selection. In some cases a user classifies a feed, such as when the user subscribes to the feed. In others, the feed contains metadata indicating that the feed's content has a particular classification or its associated user interface, such as the Yahoo!™ News feed having an indicator classifying the feed as belonging to a link classification.
Each of these classifications is associated with a user interface. Here the link classification has a news-oriented user interface. The text and formatted text classification has a blog-oriented user interface. The conversation classification has a conversation-oriented user interface. The enclosed media classification has an enclosure-oriented user interface.
Block 208 presents content tailored to the content's classification. In so doing it presents a feed in a user interface tailored to traits of the feed's content. Three exemplary user interfaces are presented below and tailored to three different classifications. These user interfaces are provided to show ways in which feeds can be presented based on the feed's content, though other user interfaces are also contemplated by the tools.
This interface also comprises a summary region 314 with headlines (e.g., titles, indicia, or short descriptions) of content items. The headlines shown are listed chronologically from items received in wired feed 312. The content items are displayed with headlines because the feed is primarily directed to providing a user with links to other sources. Users are enabled to see enough information with a headline to determine whether or not they wish to view details for the content item—such as a webpage showing a full article related to the headline.
Interface 300 also comprises a details region 316, which provides details about an item in the feed. The feed application here renders a webpage 318 associated with a first item headline 320. The feed application can render a webpage associated with content automatically or responsive to a user's selection. Here the webpage is rendered by the feed application responsive to a single user action of selecting the first item headline.
The tools can also render the enclosed files shown in region 506 with or without user action. A user may, for instance, select to play one of the music files in region 506 by clicking on the title for that file. Responsive to this selection the tools can render (play) this file. This and other ways in which the tools can render files are set forth in greater detail below as part of process 600.
Filtering and Navigating Feed and Email Content
The following discussion describes a process illustrated in
Block 602 receives content having one or more traits. These contents may be received through one or more feeds, such as Rich Site Summary (RSS) feeds, or email.
Block 604 analyzes these contents to determine their traits. Similar to process 200 above, the tools ascertain various traits of the contents. These traits can include when each content was received, from which feed or email sources they were received, whether there are comments associated with any of them, whether any are part of a string of items (e.g., an email in an email string), and whether any have enclosures and their types (e.g., photo, media, music, or document).
Assume, for example, that email application 120 receives many emails (each an item of content). Each of these emails may have defining characteristics or traits, such as types of enclosures, whether or not the email is part of an email string, or how many comments have been made to that email (e.g., how many strings originate from the email).
Assume, also for example, that feed application 116 receives many content items from multiple feeds, such as from a blog feed and a news feed (e.g., BBC™). Each of these items can be grouped by their different feeds sources, by when they were received, their enclosures and the enclosures' types, and user- or source-defined categories or other metadata. Thus, one group may have all content items received today from both feeds. Another may have items with music file enclosures from the BBC feed. Another may just have items having video enclosures from both feeds that have not been read by a user.
In both of these examples, the tools can ascertain traits of the content items that may be used to group them, display them, or enable their selection.
In one embodiment, feed application 116 analyzes content items from a blog feed and determines that one item was received today, one was received yesterday, ten were received in the last seven days, fifteen are categorized as personal in metadata associated with the feed source, two are categorized as technical in metadata associated with the feed source, six have video enclosures, fourteen have music enclosures, one has a picture enclosure, and three have other types of enclosures (e.g., word processing or spreadsheet documents). The feed application determines that the content items have various types of enclosures by finding enclosed files having particular extensions. For example, files with .jpg, .png, and .bmp extensions are deemed visual files; files with .mp3 and .wma are deemed music files; .wav are deemed video files; and .ppt, .doc, .vsd, and .xls are deemed other types of files.
Block 606 groups content items having a common trait. Content items may be grouped in more than one group, such as a content item received today that has a music enclosure—it can be in the received today group and the music enclosure group.
Block 608 presents indicia for the content oriented by group. These indicia can indicate what common trait is being used to group the content items or other information about the content items.
Block 610 enables selection of the content items by common traits, such as the groups presented at block 608. Block 610 may enable a user to select multiple items in a group by selecting indicia or otherwise. In
The content items common to a particular trait may be displayed in a content display region 730 by default or by selection. User interface 700 displays by default all content items sharing the trait of originating from the group blog in the content display region. Read and unread items are displayed in order based on the time that they were received.
Block 612 receives selection of a group of content items oriented by a common trait. The user may select a group with a single user action. Here feed user interface 118 receives a user's selection of music indicia 720.
Block 614 presents the content of the selected group. The user selected to view the content that has music file enclosures by selecting 720 in
In some cases a user may want to see or consume additional content of or related to displayed content items, such as all of the enclosures of the displayed content items.
Block 616 enables and receives a user's selection to consume enclosures of a group. Block 616 can enable the user to select to consume enclosures from one or more content items with a single user selection and through various input manners, such as keyboard entry, voice entry, and selectable controls.
Here feed user interface 118 present a selectable consume control 802, entitled “Play” in
Block 618 renders one or more enclosures of a selected group of content items. Block 618 may render enclosures through applications integrated with the feed or email applications (feed user interface 118 or email user interface 122) or with disparate applications (e.g., media application 124 or photo application 126).
Altering Traits and Navigating Based on Them
The following discussion describes a process 1000 illustrated in
Block 1002 presents content for one or more content items. An example of this is shown in
Block 1004 enables selection of one or more content items based on their traits. These traits may be indicated by graphics, icons, or other indicia and be selected with a single user action. As set forth above, feed application 116 and email application 120 may present items based on their traits and enable selection of items grouped by common traits. Content items from multiple feeds or email sources may be presented based on their comments, enclosures, or time received, for instance. The feed application presents content items from one feed grouped by other common traits in
Here user interface 1100 presents three selectable controls 1110, 1112, and 1114. Selectable control 1110 is associated with content item 1102 having comments. Selectable control 1112 is associated with content item 1102 being unread. Selectable control 1114 is associated with enclosure(s) of content item 1104.
Block 1006 receives a user's selection of one or more content items based on their trait(s). Assume that a user selects unread selectable control 1112 with a single user action, here shown in
Block 1008 navigates based on the selection. If, for example, a user selects a group of content items, block 1008 can navigate to all of them, such as by displaying them in a region of the interface. Or if a user selects one or a group of items by trait, block 1008 may open associated web page(s), such as in content display region 730 of
Here feed user interface 118 scrolls to the next content item displayed in the content display region (second content item 1108) responsive to selection of unread control 1112 and shown in
Block 1010, in some embodiments, alters a trait responsive to the user's selection. A user's selection of a trait may also or instead be considered a selection to alter that or another trait. In some cases this may improve a user's navigation and management of content by making more efficient his or her interactions. If a user selects an unread control associated with multiple items (such as one for an entire feed) block 1010 can mark all of the items of this group as read, thereby changing this trait for multiple content items. For example, a feed unread selectable control 1118 is shown in
When the user selected unread control 1112 in
Also for example, a user may select, as shown in
The tools may return to block 1004 for selection of other content items.
This interface also provides an example of content items grouped by date and feed. The interface comprises a summary region 1308 (entitled “Recent News”). The summary region comprises headlines (e.g., titles, indicia, or short descriptions) of content items in an order based on their chronology and feed. The headlines are from five different feeds: “Yahoo”; “Group Blog”; “Smuga's Blog”; “Amar's Blog”; and “Wired News”.
Feed application 116 can orient these summaries based on various filtering factors. Here the feed application determines which feeds have a links classification, what content in these feeds has not been read by the user, the age of that content, and the user's prior use of the feeds. The feed application then presents headlines for content items in chronological order for the five feeds with the strongest usage history in region 1308.
To determine which feeds have the strongest usage history (e.g., are most popular with the user), the feed application tracks which feeds are most often visited by the user and the number of read items in each feed compared to the number of unread items. If the ratio of read items to unread items for a feed is high (thus, a high percentage of the feed's items are read) the feed application ascertains that this feed is important to the user.
These factors may also be used to orient the order in which content is displayed in region 1302. As shown in
The above-described tools present content in a user interface tailored to traits of the content. They can organize content items into groups based on the content items having a common trait and enable a user to select content items by their group. Responsive to the user's selection of a group, the tools can present content, render enclosures, and alter traits of the selected content items. These and other abilities of the tools can make it easier and more enjoyable for a user to interact with content received from feeds and email sources. Although the tools have been described in language specific to structural features and/or methodological acts, it is to be understood that the subject matter defined in the appended claims is not necessarily limited to the specific features or acts described. Rather, the specific features and acts are disclosed as exemplary forms of implementing the claimed system, method, and/or computer-readable media.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5404488 | Kerrigan et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5649186 | Ferguson | Jul 1997 | A |
5819284 | Farber et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5880767 | Liu | Mar 1999 | A |
5926796 | Walker et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5974549 | Golan | Oct 1999 | A |
6085186 | Christianson et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6094657 | Hailpern et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6282546 | Gleichauf et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6366912 | Wallent et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6411331 | Sansom-Wai et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6434745 | Conley, Jr. et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6489968 | Ortega et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6507349 | Balassanian | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6515681 | Knight | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6544295 | Bodnar | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6594692 | Reisman | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6597377 | MacPhail | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6694431 | Binding et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6708172 | Wong et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6732102 | Khandekar | May 2004 | B1 |
6766458 | Harris et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6775772 | Binding et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6829619 | Wakamatsu et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6874084 | Dobner et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
7137009 | Gordon et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7143084 | Rinearson et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7257564 | Loughmiller et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7676575 | Yamada et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
20020108115 | Palmer | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020116630 | Stehlin | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020124172 | Manahan | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020133720 | Sherman | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020156905 | Weissman | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020174201 | Ramer et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020184491 | Morgan et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020194151 | Fenton et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030014406 | Faieta et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030028762 | Trilli et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030050995 | Mateos | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030101412 | Eid | May 2003 | A1 |
20030117511 | Belz et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030135504 | Elvanoglu et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030137538 | Hesmer et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030167402 | Stolfo et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030177501 | Takahashi et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040003097 | Willis et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040046885 | Regan et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040093563 | Pasquali | May 2004 | A1 |
20040143683 | Greenwood | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040167964 | Rounthwaite et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040177383 | Martinolich et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040181753 | Michaelides | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040210824 | Shoff et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040225749 | Pavlik et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040230676 | Spivack et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040250115 | Gemmel et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040268258 | Lee et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050010595 | Brown et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050015452 | Corson | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050033657 | Herrington et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050038717 | McQueen, II et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050050460 | Bedingfield | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050065906 | Romero | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050088452 | Hanggie et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050097180 | Abdelhak | May 2005 | A1 |
20050108227 | Russell-Falla et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050119910 | Schneider | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050119913 | Hornreich et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050165615 | Minar | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050171836 | Leacy | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050216439 | Kawakita | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050256768 | Robinson | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050268100 | Gasparini et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060053293 | Zager et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060218403 | Sauve et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060230021 | Diab et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070061711 | Bodin et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070094389 | Nussey et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070100836 | Eichstaedt et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070100959 | Eichstaedt et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070130518 | Shavit et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070282973 | Chapman et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2496672 | Feb 2004 | CA |
1128288 | Aug 2001 | EP |
2364408 | Jan 2002 | GB |
2009506401 | Feb 2009 | JP |
20050015452 | Jan 2005 | RU |
20050088452 | Apr 2005 | RU |
WO0126018 | Apr 2001 | WO |
WO 0207013 | Jan 2002 | WO |
WO 2004107216 | Dec 2004 | WO |
WO2005027402 | Mar 2005 | WO |
WO2005089336 | Sep 2005 | WO |
WO2005098675 | Oct 2005 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070016609 A1 | Jan 2007 | US |