The present disclosure relates to vehicle communications systems, and more particularly to a system and method for feedback cancellation for a vehicle communications system.
Vehicles in industrial and public safety applications have had intercom/radio mixer systems for many decades. These systems allow the vehicle users to communicate amongst themselves and also communicate to distant individuals using mobile radio technology. The systems have often incorporated headsets due to loud ambient noise environments inside and outside the vehicle. These systems aim to provide more coherent communication in the vehicle.
Some of these vehicle communication systems utilize headsets. Headsets may introduce some potential drawbacks including the additional time to don the headset, comfort, and restriction of movement. The donning of headsets takes additional time when entering the vehicle. In particular, for public safety workers, every second counts when trying to get as quickly as possible to the scene of an emergency. Even the couple of seconds that it takes to find and don a headset can be distracting and have a negative effect on the outcome of a life threatening situation. Headsets may become uncomfortable depending on the design and length of time that a particular headset is worn. If uncomfortable, crewmembers may decide not to wear the headsets, thereby exposing crewmembers to the inability to effectively communicate over the vehicle radio and amongst fellow crewmembers. Further, some headsets, such as corded headsets, can restrict the movement of a crewmember's head and reduce the ability to move about the interior of a vehicle.
As vehicle, engine, and transmission soundproofing technologies have advanced, the interiors of many industrial and public safety vehicles have become quieter. Despite soundproofing advancements, the interiors of these types of vehicles are still relatively large and are not completely soundproof, and thus are not conducive to easy communication amongst crewmembers. In addition, cabin speakers that broadcast radio traffic inside of the vehicles may have limitations including distortion, difficult placement, and the risk of being too loud.
Thus, it is advantageous to implement an improved vehicle crew communication system that does not require headsets (although headsets may be used with the system), positions speakers closer to crewmembers than traditional cabin speakers, and allows for verbal communication between crewmembers to be easily detected by a microphone and transmitted. In some embodiments, an individual seat system that incorporates speakers and a microphone that is integrated into the overall vehicle communications system constitutes an improved system. Moreover, in embodiments where the speakers and microphone are in close proximity, there is negligible feedback such that the system provides consistent and coherent communications.
The present disclosure provides a system and method for feedback cancellation for a vehicle communications system.
According to an embodiment of the present disclosure, a method of cancelling feedback in a vehicle communications system is provided. The method includes receiving a microphone signal from a microphone device, routing the microphone signal over a first signal path and a second signal path, and adjusting a phase and a polarity of the microphone signal on the first signal path to provide an inverted microphone signal having a shifted phase. The method further includes receiving a speaker signal. A component of the speaker signal includes the microphone signal routed over the second signal path. The method further includes modifying the speaker signal by summing the speaker signal and the inverted microphone signal to cancel out at least a portion of the microphone signal component of the speaker signal.
According to another embodiment of the present disclosure, a feedback cancellation electronic circuit for a vehicle communications system is provided. The circuit includes a first circuit path configured to receive a microphone signal provided by a microphone device. The circuit further includes a second circuit path configured to receive the microphone signal provided by the microphone device. The circuit further includes a phase shifter coupled to the first circuit path. The phase shifter is operative to adjust a phase and a polarity of the microphone signal on the first signal path to produce an inverted microphone signal having a shifted phase. The circuit further includes a summing amplifier operative to receive a speaker signal from the second signal path and the inverted microphone signal from the first signal path and to output a modified speaker signal. A component of the received speaker signal includes the microphone signal routed over the second signal path. The summing amplifier is operative to sum the inverted microphone signal and the received speaker signal to cancel out at least a portion of the microphone signal component of the received speaker signal.
According to yet another embodiment of the present disclosure, a vehicle communications system is provided. The system includes a microphone device operative to detect audio and to output a microphone signal based on the audio. The microphone device is positioned proximate a seat of the vehicle. The system further includes an intercom control device operative to receive the microphone signal and to output a speaker signal. A component of the speaker signal includes the microphone signal. The system further includes a seat control station in communication with the intercom control device. The seat control station includes feedback cancellation logic operative to receive the microphone signal. The feedback cancellation logic includes phase shift logic operative to adjust a phase of the microphone signal to produce a modified microphone signal having a shifted phase. The feedback cancellation logic further includes summing logic operative to receive the modified microphone signal and the speaker signal and to sum the modified microphone signal and the speaker signal to cancel out at least a portion of the microphone signal component of the speaker signal.
The above-mentioned and other features and advantages of this disclosure, and the manner of attaining them, will become more apparent and the disclosure itself will be better understood by reference to the following description of embodiments taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
Corresponding reference characters indicate corresponding parts throughout the several views. The exemplifications set out herein illustrate embodiments of the disclosure, and such exemplifications are not to be construed as limiting the scope of the disclosure in any manner.
The present disclosure relates generally to providing communications to the crew of a vehicle with feedback cancellation technology so as to limit the amount of feedback in a communications system. The communications system provides vehicle crewmembers the ability to communicate without the need to wear headsets, although headsets may be used with the communications system as well. Microphones and speakers are illustratively seat-mounted or vehicle-mounted. Moreover, the system incorporates a phase contouring feedback cancellation electronic circuit that allows for a microphone to be placed within close proximity to speakers while reducing or eliminating audible feedback in the communications system. The communications include both radio communications between a vehicle crew and individuals remote from the vehicle and communications between crew members inside and outside the vehicle. While not limited to any particular vehicle, exemplary embodiments relate to industrial vehicles, cranes, military vehicles, marine vessels, and public safety vehicles such as fire apparatus and ambulances, for example.
With reference to
The microphone 130 incorporated in each of the individual system positions 110, 115, and 120 may be of several types depending on the kind of vehicle 105 and the noise levels of the interior of the vehicle 105. A preferred embodiment for the microphone 130 incorporates a noise-canceling microphone with a bidirectional pattern that cancels the far field sounds and amplifies the near field sounds. In some embodiments, noise cancelling microphones cancel low frequency noise better than high frequency noise. In the illustrated embodiment, microphones 130 are placed close to the mouth of the crewmember.
Seat positions 110, 115, and 120 each have one or more speakers 140 that are embedded in the inside of the seat headrest 133. Other embodiments can have the speakers 140 mounted in numerous different ways including but not limited to: attached to the exterior of the headrest 133, mounted to the top of the headrest 133, or affixed above or to the sides of the headrest 133. Seat positions 110, 115, and 120 each have a volume control switch 145 (
In the illustrated embodiment, individual system position 110, 115, or 120 has a constantly open microphone 130 for hands free communication over the vehicle intercom function of the system and uses the seat PTT switch 150 (
The system 100 also incorporates side tone for each individual seat system position 123 and wireless headset 128. Side tone is the sound perception feature that provides audible feedback to a user who is speaking In some embodiments, side tone increases the usability of a communications system and increases the comfort of a user. The side tone circuitry may reside either in an intercom master station 165, a seat position control station 170 or wireless headset 128.
As illustrated in
Referring to
If a seat sensor 185 is detecting that a crewmember is sitting in a seat 180, the seat position control station 170 has a delay circuit for delaying deactivation of the seat system position 123 when the seat sensor 185 no longer detects a crewmember in a seat 180. This delay is so that if the vehicle hits a bump and bounces the crewmember or if a crewmember gets up from the seat momentarily and the seat sensor 185 no longer detects a crewmember sitting in the seat 180, the individual seat system position 123 does not turn off instantly. As an example, if this delay circuit was not present and the vehicle 105 was going through a bumpy section of blacktop, the transmit and receive speech from an individual seat system position 123 may be interrupted numerous times because the crewmember would be bouncing around in his/her seat 180 and turning the seat sensor 185 on and off repeatedly, thus creating a poor user experience and the opportunity for important communications to be missed or not heard. In some embodiments, the delay is three to five seconds but can be adjusted to the time delay required by a specific vehicle application.
As illustrated in
In the illustrated embodiment, at least one radio 160 is coupled to the intercom master station 165. A radio is not required for the vehicle crew communications system 100 to be operational, and thus the radio 160 is optional. For example, many applications only require communications amongst the crewmembers of the vehicle 105. Thus, the radio 160 is not required in such “intercom-only” applications. The radio 160 is used for communications at long distances from the vehicle 105. Some applications may require more than one radio 160. In such cases, a selector switch may be coupled to the intercom master station 165 and the required radios 160. For example, the Setcom® System 900 intercom master station may incorporate up to three radios in the vehicle crew communications system 100.
Seat position control station 170 includes a feedback cancellation circuit 193 (
In many conventional systems, when these conditions are met, the system will oscillate. In some systems, fewer or additional criteria may be required for the system to oscillate. In some examples, the oscillation is maintained at the maximum power the amplifier can provide to the speaker 140 until the criteria changes. The oscillation may be induced by any input into the microphone 130. Oscillation may occur spontaneously if the criteria are met and there is sufficient acoustic noise in the environment or electrical noise in the speaker and microphone system. In many systems, any signal when the criteria are met will propagate through the system gaining amplitude with each iteration through the signal loop until oscillation is sustained at the maximum power a system is capable of producing. Oscillation will often cease once the input is discontinued.
In an intercom-type communications system where all crewmembers are wearing headsets 128 for communications, all of the various microphone inputs are received by the intercom master station which mixes these signals and amplifies the resulting signal to a level sufficient to drive small speakers which are part of the crew headsets. This speaker signal is sent out over a common lead to deliver to all headsets 128. In this arrangement audible feedback is unlikely because the microphones and speakers may be isolated from each other acoustically by the crewmember's head and headset cups and further by the low level of power delivered to each headset speaker pair. In this arrangement, crewmembers can hear all other crewmembers speaking and can hear their own voice over the intercom speaker feed as well (for the purpose of this document, referred to as side tone).
In the vehicle crew communications system 100 of the present disclosure, the intercom master station 165 receives the various microphone inputs, mixes these signals, and amplifies the resulting signal which is sent out over a common lead to the control stations 170. However, in the individual seat system position 123 there is typically no acoustic isolation between the microphone 130 and speakers 140. The seat position control station 170 is operative to provide additional amplification thereby providing greater audio power than the intercom master station 165 in order to drive the headrest-mounted speakers 140 to a higher volume level. Without the feedback cancellation circuit 193 of the present disclosure, this may lead to feedback if the volume control 145 were set high enough and/or the microphone 130 came into close enough proximity to a speaker 140. Both conditions are often met during normal use of the vehicle crew communication system 100.
To accommodate this arrangement of speakers 140 and microphone 130 in the individual seat system position 123, a feedback cancellation circuit 193 of
In operation, audio signals from each microphone in the system, including a wired individual seat system position 123 and/or a wireless base station 190, are summed together in the intercom master station 165, amplified, and sent back out over the common speaker drive lead 194 to the control stations 170 and/or base station 190. The frequency response of this signal chain is relatively flat but is limited in bandwidth, which causes some variation in phase response at the band edges due to the circuit resistances and reactances used for coupling and filtering. Additional phase shift is introduced by the characteristics of the microphone 130 and speaker 140. At the seat position control station 170 the speaker drive signal received over lead 194 is again amplified to drive the speakers 140 in the individual seat system position 123, adding more phase shift to the signal due to the characteristics of the speaker power amplifier 220. The net result of these effects creates a situation where feedback may occur.
As described herein, the feedback cancellation provided with feedback cancellation circuit 193 includes taking a sample of the local microphone signal (of position 123) and summing it with the mixed intercom receive signal being fed to the speaker in a reduced level and of opposite polarity. This causes the audio signal from the local microphone 130 to partially cancel out the same microphone signal which had been sent to the intercom master station 165, amplified and sent back through the common speaker leads. It would have no effect on signals from other microphones from other positions 123 since they are not known to the local microphone 130.
In some systems, the two signals of the opposing-polarity cancellation scheme have differing characteristics, particularly in terms of phase response. One signal path, in particular the signal path through the intercom master station 165, goes through more circuitry than the other signal path (i.e., the local microphone signal) and accumulates more phase shift than the other signal path. In these systems, the signals are no longer identical at the point in the system where opposing-polarity cancellation is implemented, thus potentially leaving a chance for some given frequency to satisfy the criteria needed for feedback to occur as well as reduced intelligibility. This is illustrated graphically in
In the Phase Contouring method of feedback cancellation of the present disclosure, feedback cancellation circuit 193 is implemented in the design of the seat position control station 170 electronics for compensating for the phase shift. Referring to
The variable phase shifter and polarity inverter 205 allows tuning and contouring the phase response, amplitude and polarity of the microphone signal received from microphone bias and audio filter 195, thereby creating a similar but opposite polarity signal with respect to the signal received by the level adjuster 215 and passed on to the summing amplifier 210. This is shown graphically in
With further reference to
The feedback cancellation circuit 193 improves feedback cancellation by not only providing an inverted copy of a signal, but by providing a means to also compensate for phase shift acquired by the signal as it passes through various elements of a communication system 100, thus allowing much more complete cancellation and providing greater protection against a condition which could cause feedback.
In some embodiments, the cancellation method employs analog circuitry and thus operates real time, so there is no delay or lag in the operation. Alternatively, digital implementations of the cancellation may be provided. However, digital implementations of feedback cancellation may have a finite non-zero response time, often allowing a brief “chirp” sound to be heard before the feedback is fully cancelled.
An exemplary operation is as follows, with reference to
Seat positions 123 each allow a crewmember to verbally speak through the vehicle crew communications system 100 in intercom-mode. A Radio Transmit Position (RTP) 123 has an open microphone 130 so the crewmember needs to have the microphone 130 positioned properly and speak. The crewmember's voice will then be transmitted to the speaker(s) 140 in other seat system positions 123 and headsets 128 in the system 100. An Intercom-only Position (IOP) 123 has a closed microphone 130 unless the momentary switch 150 is activated and held in the activated position by the crewmember. When the momentary switch 150 is activated, the microphone 130 is opened and allows sound to be passed into the system 100. The crewmember activates the switch 150 and holds it in the activated position and speaks into a properly positioned microphone 130. The crewmember's voice is then transmitted to the speaker(s) 140 in other seat system positions 123 and headsets 128 in the system 100. A Push-on, Push-off Intercom-only Position (POPO IOP) 123 has either an open or closed microphone 130 depending on the last setting of the POPO switch 150. If the switch 150 is currently in an open state, then the next time it is pressed and released, it will be in a closed state and vice versa. If in a closed state, the crewmember pushes and releases the switch 150 and the microphone 130 opens. If in an open state, the crewmember does not need to press the switch 150. Once the microphone 130 is open, the crewmember speaks into the properly positioned microphone 130. The crewmember's voice is then transmitted to the speaker(s) 140 in other seat system positions 123 and headsets 128 in the system 100.
Crewmembers in the different positions 123 may also verbally transmit over the radio 160 with the communications system 100. A crewmember in a RTP position 123 presses and holds the switch 150. This action PTTs (activates or keys) the radio 160 and any noise that goes into the microphone 130 is transmitted over the radio 160 including the crewmember's speech. When the switch 150 is released, the radio 160 stops transmitting and the crewmember's speech is no longer transmitted. In some embodiments, a crewmember in the IOP position 123 and the POPO IOP position 123 is unable to transmit over the radio 160, but may alternatively be able to talk over the radio in the IOP and POPO IOP positions 123 as with the RTP position 123.
When the crewmember leaves the seat 180, the seat sensor 185 signals the seat position control station 170 that the seat is now unoccupied. The delay circuit in the seat position control station keeps the individual seat system position 123 activated until the delay period has expired. Upon the delay period expiration, the communications of the individual seat system position 123 is turned off.
Several alternative embodiments may be provided, including the following:
A. Split Audio Streams. Instead of a single stream of audio that is transmitted through both speakers 140 in an individual seat system position 123 that mixes multiple streams of radio communications with intercom communications, a split audio system may be provided to split two streams of radio communications and deliver each separate stream to a separate speaker. For example, the split audio intercom system allows for listening to multiple channels, such as both an airport tower and fire dispatch radio channels, at the same time and splits the audio streams into different speakers in the headset. With this system, the vehicle 105 intercom audio stream and the fire dispatch radio audio dispatch are heard in the left ear speaker of the headset and the airport tower radio stream is heard in the right ear speaker. Similarly, with the vehicle crew communications system 100, different audio streams from the different radios 160 and the intercom communication audio streams may be split and directed to the chosen speaker 140.
B. Wireless Connection Between Seat Position Control Station and Intercom Master Station. Instead of the intercom master station 165 being coupled to the seat position control station 170 with a physical cable, an alternative embodiment would have the two devices coupled wirelessly.
C. Voice Activated Microphone Circuitry. In this embodiment, voice activated (VOX) microphone circuitry is incorporated into the vehicle crew communications system 100 for all or any of the individual seat positions 110, 115, and 120 or the wireless headset 128. The VOX circuit provides a noise gate in which a noise level threshold is set for the microphone input level. This threshold level is user adjustable for different ambient noise environments. Any noise below the threshold is disregarded and not passed through the system. A near field noise that is louder than the threshold is allowed to pass through.
D. Wired Headsets Incorporated into the System. Instead of using an individual seat system position 123 or wireless headset 128, a wired or corded headset may be used with the vehicle crew communications system 100. For example, the Setcom® CSB-900 headset manufactured by Pinnacle Peak Holding Corporation of Austin, Tex. is a wired headset that may be coupled to the intercom master station 165.
E. Hybrid Digital/Analog Feedback Cancellation Technique. In this embodiment, a method is provided wherein a feedback condition in the audio pathway is detected by a microprocessor or digital signal processor of circuit 193 analyzing a digitized version of the audio signal, and providing a corrective output to be converted into an analog control signal, fed to a version of the adjustable phase shifter that is capable of being tuned by a control voltage, control current or common digital communication method.
F. Digital Feedback Cancellation Technique (A.) In this embodiment, a method is provided wherein a feedback condition in the audio pathway is detected by a microprocessor or digital signal processor of circuit 193 analyzing a digitized version of the microphone audio signal, and performing the phase shift function on that signal mathematically in the digital domain, converting that correction signal back to an analog signal to be then fed to the summing amplifier 210 for cancellation.
G. Digital Feedback Cancellation Technique (B.) In this embodiment, a method is provided wherein a feedback condition in the audio pathway is detected by a microprocessor or digital signal processor of circuit 193 analyzing a digitized version of both the microphone audio signal and the speaker audio received from the intercom master station 165, performing the phase shift function on the microphone signal mathematically in the digital domain, and performing the subtraction of the microphone signal from the speaker audio signal also mathematically, lastly converting the processed signal back to analog to be fed to the speaker power amplifier 220.
For the embodiments E, F, and G above, such embodiments consist of an accurate digital implementation of the feedback cancellation circuit, so as to overcome the problems encountered with other conventional digital systems which employ techniques such as frequency-shifting and variable frequency-response notch filtering.
The components of feedback cancellation circuit 193 of
Referring to
In some embodiments, the phase of the microphone signal on the first signal path is adjusted such that the shifted phase of the inverted microphone signal substantially matches the phase of the microphone signal component of the speaker signal. In some embodiments, the feedback cancellation circuit 193 adjusts the amplitude of the microphone signal on the first signal path such that the amplitude of the inverted microphone signal substantially matches the amplitude of the microphone signal component of the speaker signal. In some embodiments, the modified speaker signal includes a residual or substantially reduced (or eliminated) level of the microphone signal component. In some embodiments, the feedback cancellation circuit 193 amplifies the modified speaker signal with speaker power amplifier 220 and routes the amplified speaker signal to a speaker device.
While the feedback cancellation circuit of the present disclosure is described in conjunction with seat/vehicle mounted speaker and microphone configurations, the feedback cancellation circuit of the present disclosure is also operative to cancel feedback in other configurations. For example, the feedback cancellation circuit may be utilized in headset configurations or other suitable configurations.
While the embodiments have been described as having exemplary designs, the disclosed embodiments can be further modified within the spirit and scope of this disclosure. This application is therefore intended to cover any variations, uses, or adaptations of the embodiments using its general principles. Further, this application is intended to cover such departures from the present disclosure as come within known or customary practice in the art to which this disclosure pertains and which fall within the limits of the appended claims.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/805,693, filed Mar. 27, 2013, the entire disclosure of which is expressly incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61805693 | Mar 2013 | US |