Feeder belt with internally manufactured staples for true multi-fire surgical stapler

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8985427
  • Patent Number
    8,985,427
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, May 5, 2009
    15 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, March 24, 2015
    9 years ago
Abstract
An exemplary surgical apparatus may include a feeder belt; wings fixed to that feeder belt; and a die into which the feeder belt extends, where relative motion of the die and feeder belt bends at least one wing to transform at least one wing into an unformed staple. An exemplary surgical method for treating tissue of a patient may include providing a surgical instrument including an end effector; placing the end effector adjacent to tissue of a patient; and manufacturing at least one surgical staple within the end effector.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The invention generally relates to surgical staplers and stapling.


BACKGROUND

An endocutter is a surgical tool that staples and cuts tissue to transect that tissue while leaving the cut ends hemostatic. An endocutter is small enough in diameter for use in minimally invasive surgery, where access to a surgical site is obtained through a trocar, port, or small incision in the body. A linear cutter is a larger version of an endocutter, and is used to transect portions of the gastrointestinal tract. A typical endocutter receives at its distal end a disposable single-use cartridge with several rows of staples, and includes an anvil opposed to the cartridge. During actuation of an endocutter, the cartridge fires all of the staples that it holds. In order to deploy more staples, the endocutter must be moved away from the surgical site and removed from the patient, after which the old cartridge is exchanged for a new cartridge. The endocutter is then reinserted into the patient. However, it can be difficult and/or time-consuming to locate the surgical site after reinsertion. Further, the process of removing the endocutter from the patient after each use, replacing the cartridge, and then finding the surgical site again is tedious, inconvenient and time-consuming, particularly where a surgical procedure requires multiple uses of the endocutter.


In order to overcome these difficulties, Cardica, Inc. of Redwood City, Calif. has developed a true multi-fire endocutter that is capable of firing multiple times without the need to utilize single-use disposable cartridges. That endocutter is described in, for example, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/263,171, filed on Oct. 31, 2008 (the “Endocutter Document”), which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. In order to accomplish such multiple firing, a feeder belt is used, to which a plurality of staples are attached. The staples are sheared from the feeder belt during firing of the endocutter. The feeder belt is long and thin. The feeder belt can extend through a shaft of the tool and into a stapler head that engages tissue.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a bottom cutaway view of an exemplary feeder belt within a first exemplary die.



FIG. 2 is a perspective view of the feeder belt and die of FIG. 1, with the die in phantom view.



FIG. 3 is a perspective view of the feeder belt of FIG. 1, with the die removed for clarity.



FIG. 4 is a perspective phantom view of the die of FIG. 1.



FIG. 5 is an end view of an exemplary feeder belt within a second exemplary die, with the die in an open configuration.



FIG. 6 is an end view of the feeder belt and die of FIG. 5, with the die in a closed configuration.



FIG. 7 is a top view of the feeder belt and die of FIG. 5, with the die shown in cutaway.





The use of the same reference symbols in different figures indicates similar or identical items.


DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The Endocutter Document describes exemplary feeder belts used in a surgical stapler. In certain surgical applications, it may be advantageous to reduce the profile of the end effector of the surgical stapler. Further, where the surgical stapler is articulated, it may be simpler to advance the feeder belt to the end effector where the staples have not yet been created.


Referring to FIGS. 1-4, at least one feeder belt 2 may extend into an die 4 in the end effector of the surgical stapler. Alternately, the die 4 may be located in a different position within the surgical stapler. A plurality of wings 6 may extend from the feeder belt 2 proximal to the die 4. The feeder belt 2 may be substantially planar, and the wings 6 may be in substantially the same plane as the feeder belt 2. In this way, the feeder belt 2 and wings 6 collectively are in the same plane, minimizing the thickness of any passage or aperture in the surgical stapler through which they collectively pass. Each wing 6 may include a free end 10 and a second, opposite end 12 fixed to the feeder belt 2.


The die 4 includes at least one contact surface 8. The contact surface 8 may be angled downward and outward, at least in part, and the angle of the contact surface 8 relative to the plane of the feeder belt 2 increases from the proximal to the distal direction. The wings 6 may be arranged on both lateral sides of the feeder belt 2, such that the wings 6 are arranged in two rows on opposite sides of the feeder belt 2. Alternately, the wings 6 are arranged differently on the feeder belt 2, or into one row or three or more rows. Advantageously, the die 4 provides a different contact surface 8 corresponding to each row of wings 6. Alternately, the contact surface 8 is not angled, but rather is curved at least in part.


The die 4 may be held in a substantially fixed position relative to the feeder belt 2, such as within the end effector of the surgical stapler. The feeder belt 2 may be advanced distally relative to the die 4, where that advancement may be performed such as set forth in the Endocutter Document. As the feeder belt 2 is moved distally, one or more wings 6 enter the die 4 and encounter an contact surface 8. For simplicity, such contact is described with respect to a single wing 6. As the feeder belt 2 advances distally, a wing 6 encounters the proximal end of a corresponding contact surface 8. The contact surface 8, at its proximal end, is angled or curved slightly out of plane relative to the wing 6, in such a manner that contact between the wing 6 and the contact surface 8 exerts a force on the wing 6 that bends the wing 6 slightly downward relative to the feeder belt 2 and relative to its previous position. As the wing 6 moves distally through the die, the contact surface 8 angles or curves to a progressively greater degree, such that the wing 6 continues to bend downward relative to the feeder belt 2 and the original orientation of the wing 6. Advantageously, the wing 6 bends at or in proximity to the end 12 of the wing 6 fixed to the feeder belt 2, and the wing 6 itself remains in substantially a single plane, where than plane angles away from the plane of the feeder belt 2 an increasing amount as the wing 6 moves distally. At the distal end of the contact surface 8, the angled or curved surface is angled substantially ninety degrees relative to the feeder belt 2, such that the wing 6 is oriented at substantially a ninety degree angle relative to the feeder belt 2. Alternately, the final angle of the wing 6 relative to the feeder belt 2 may be different than substantially ninety degrees. The wing 6 has been bent to a second angle relative to the feeder belt 2 that is different from the first angle that the wing 6 made with the feeder belt 2. At this point, the wing 6 has been transformed into a staple 14, and the staple 14 is pulled out of the distal end of the die 4 by the distal motion of the feeder belt 2. The staples 14 exiting the feeder belt 2 are unformed, and may be configured substantially as set forth in the Endocutter Document. The unformed staples 14 are configured for deployment into tissue, as set forth in the Endocutter Document. Each staple 14 is frangibly connected to the feeder belt 2 upon its exit from the die. Optionally, such frangibility may result from stress exerted on the end 12 of the staple 14 connected to the feeder belt 2. That is, the wings 6 optionally may be connected to the feeder belt 2 strongly enough that they are not frangibly connected to the feeder belt 2, and such that the weakening of the end 12 of the wing 6 connected to the feeder belt 2 by rotation of the wing 6 relative to the feeder belt 2 renders the unformed staple 14 frangible from the feeder belt 2.


As seen most clearly in FIG. 3, staples 14 may be progressively formed from wings 6 with the die 4, such that the angle that each wing 6 of several within the die 4 is different from one or more of the others, until the wing 6 has reached the distal end of the die 4 and been formed into a staple 14.


As a result of motion of the feeder belt 2 through the die 4, staples 14 are manufactured by the die 4. Where the die 4 is located in the end effector of the surgical stapler, the staples 14 are manufactured within the end effector, such that manufacture of the staples 14 may be performed within a patient while the end effector is adjacent to tissue of the patient, or otherwise located within a patient. The wings 6 are not staples, because they are not oriented in a fashion in which they can be deployed into tissue. The wings 6 must be bent and reoriented by the die 4 before they can be deployed into tissue of a patient.


Referring to FIGS. 5-7, a different die may be utilized to manufacture staples 14 within the surgical instrument. The die 4 may include an upper piece 16 and a lower piece 18. At least one of the upper piece 16 and lower piece 18 is movable relative to the other. The lower piece 18 may include a ridge 20, the upper surface of which supports or otherwise contacts the underside of the feeder belt 2. The upper piece 16 may include a cavity 22 shaped substantially the same as, and slightly larger than, the ridge 20.


Referring also to FIG. 6, the die 4 begins to close as the upper piece 16 and/or lower piece 18 move toward one another, the upper piece 16 bends the wings 6 below it, while the ridge 20 supports the feeder belt 2. The feeder belt 2 may be substantially stationary relative to the die 4 as the die closes. Advantageously, the wing 6 bends at or in proximity to the end 12 of the wing 6 fixed to the feeder belt 2, and the wing 6 itself remains in substantially a single plane, where than plane angles away from the plane of the feeder belt 2 an increasing amount as the die 4 closes. When the die 4 is completely closed, such that the upper piece 16 and/or lower piece 18 no longer move toward one another, the wings 6 within the die 4 may be oriented at substantially a ninety degree angle relative to the feeder belt 2. Alternately, the final angle of the wings 6 relative to the feeder belt 2 may be different than substantially ninety degrees. The wings 6 have been bent to a second angle relative to the feeder belt 2 that is different from the first angle that the wing 6 made with the feeder belt 2. At this point, the wings 6 in the die 4 have been transformed into staples 14, and the staples 14 are pulled out of the distal end of the die 4 by the distal motion of the feeder belt 2. The staples 14 exiting the feeder belt 2 are unformed, and may be configured substantially as set forth in the Endocutter Document.


Optionally, the upper piece 16 and lower piece 20 may be moved to close the die 4 by closing the end effector of the surgical stapler, as set forth in the Endocutter Document. For example, the upper piece 16 may be held in the anvil of the surgical stapler, and the lower piece 20 may be held in the staple holder of the surgical stapler, such that closure of the end effector of the surgical stapler closes the die 4 and transforms the wings 6 within the die 4 into unformed staples 14.


While the invention has been described in detail, it will be apparent to one skilled in the art that various changes and modifications can be made and equivalents employed, without departing from the present invention. It is to be understood that the invention is not limited to the details of construction, the arrangements of components, and/or the method set forth in the above description or illustrated in the drawings. Statements in the abstract of this document, and any summary statements in this document, are merely exemplary; they are not, and cannot be interpreted as, limiting the scope of the claims. Further, the figures are merely exemplary and not limiting. Topical headings and subheadings are for the convenience of the reader only. They should not and cannot be construed to have any substantive significance, meaning or interpretation, and should not and cannot be deemed to indicate that all of the information relating to any particular topic is to be found under or limited to any particular heading or subheading. Therefore, the invention is not to be restricted or limited except in accordance with the following claims and their legal equivalents.

Claims
  • 1. A surgical apparatus, comprising: a feeder belt;a plurality of wings fixed to said feeder belt; anda die into which said feeder belt extends, wherein relative motion of said die and said feeder belt bends at least one said wing to transform said at least one wing into an unformed staple;wherein at least a portion of said feeder belt is retained within said die after at least one said wing is transformed into at least one said unformed staple.
  • 2. The surgical apparatus of claim 1, wherein said wings are substantially in the same plane as said feeder belt.
  • 3. The surgical apparatus of claim 1, wherein each said wing comprises a first end fixed to said feeder belt and a second, free end.
  • 4. The surgical apparatus of claim 1, wherein each said staple comprises a first end frangibly connected to said feeder belt and a second, free end.
  • 5. The surgical apparatus of claim 1, wherein each said unformed staple is oriented at substantially a right angle to said feeder belt.
  • 6. The surgical apparatus of claim 1, wherein said die includes a contact surface shaped such that distal motion of said feeder belt urges at least one said wing against said contact surface to bend said at least one wing.
  • 7. The surgical apparatus of claim 6, wherein said contact surface is substantially fixed in location.
  • 8. The surgical apparatus of claim 1, wherein said die includes two pieces, at least one of which is movable relative to the other in a direction substantially perpendicular to said feeder belt to close the die, wherein closure of said die bends at least one said wing.
  • 9. The surgical apparatus of claim 8, wherein said die is movable relative to said feeder belt when said feeder belt is substantially stationary.
US Referenced Citations (64)
Number Name Date Kind
2964751 Lang Dec 1960 A
3170279 Dubini Feb 1965 A
3581551 Wilkinson Jun 1971 A
3650453 Smith, Jr. Mar 1972 A
3899914 Akiyama Aug 1975 A
4043504 Hueil et al. Aug 1977 A
4086926 Green et al. May 1978 A
4206863 Savino Jun 1980 A
4228895 Larkin Oct 1980 A
4328918 Yoshida May 1982 A
4475679 Fleury, Jr. Oct 1984 A
4583276 Olesen Apr 1986 A
4619391 Sharkany et al. Oct 1986 A
4633861 Chow et al. Jan 1987 A
4669647 Storace Jun 1987 A
4762260 Richards et al. Aug 1988 A
4969591 Richards et al. Nov 1990 A
5156315 Green et al. Oct 1992 A
5192288 Thompson et al. Mar 1993 A
5413272 Green et al. May 1995 A
5476206 Green Dec 1995 A
5655698 Yoon Aug 1997 A
5662260 Yoon Sep 1997 A
5692668 Schulze et al. Dec 1997 A
5810855 Rayburn et al. Sep 1998 A
5816471 Plyley et al. Oct 1998 A
5855311 Hamblin et al. Jan 1999 A
5894979 Powell Apr 1999 A
5908149 Welch et al. Jun 1999 A
5918791 Sorrentino et al. Jul 1999 A
5964774 McKean et al. Oct 1999 A
6086304 Hujishima et al. Jul 2000 A
6306149 Meade Oct 2001 B1
6391038 Vargas et al. May 2002 B2
6602252 Mollenauer Aug 2003 B2
6716232 Vidal et al. Apr 2004 B1
6817508 Racenet Nov 2004 B1
6843403 Whitman Jan 2005 B2
7025747 Smith Apr 2006 B2
7097089 Marczyk Aug 2006 B2
7140527 Ehrenfels et al. Nov 2006 B2
7168604 Milliman et al. Jan 2007 B2
7172104 Scirica et al. Feb 2007 B2
7179267 Nolan et al. Feb 2007 B2
7207471 Heinrich et al. Apr 2007 B2
7213736 Wales et al. May 2007 B2
7225963 Scirica Jun 2007 B2
7225964 Mastri et al. Jun 2007 B2
7234624 Gresham et al. Jun 2007 B2
7238195 Viola Jul 2007 B2
7510106 Manabe Mar 2009 B2
20030120284 Palacios et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030236551 Peterson Dec 2003 A1
20050184121 Heinrich Aug 2005 A1
20060011699 Olson et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060041273 Ortiz et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060151567 Roy Jul 2006 A1
20070027472 Hiles et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070034668 Holsten et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070073341 Smith et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070083234 Shelton, IV et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070118163 Boudreaux et al. May 2007 A1
20070125828 Rethy et al. Jun 2007 A1
20080078807 Hess et al. Apr 2008 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (5)
Number Date Country
1238634 Sep 1994 EP
2005160933 Jun 2005 JP
2080833 Jun 1997 RU
WO-8101953 Jul 1981 WO
WO-8501427 Apr 1985 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (7)
Entry
Gong, Shao W., “Perfectly flexible mechanism and integrated mechanism system design”, Mechanism and Machine Theory 39 (2004), (Nov. 2004),1155-1174.
Lim, Jonas J., et al., “A review of mechanism used in laparascopic surgical instruments”, Mechanism and Machine Theory 38, (2003),1133-1147.
Lim, Jyue B., “Type Synthesis of a Complex Surgical Device”, Masters Thesis, (Feb. 21, 2001).
Lim, Jonas J., et al., “Application of Type Synthesis Theory to the Redesign of a Complex Surgical Instrument”, Journal of Biomechanical Engineering (124), (Jun. 2004),265-272.
Kolios, Efrossini et al., “Microlaparoscopy”, J. Endourology 18(9), (Nov. 2004),811-817.
Steichen, Felicien M., et al., “Mechanical Sutures in Surgery”, Brit. J. Surg. 60(3), (Mar. 1973),191-197.
“Cardica Microcutter Implant Delivery Device 510(k), Cover Sheet, Table 10.1, “Substantial Equivalence Comparison,” and Section 12, “Substantial Equivalence Discussion””.