Feeder movement compensation

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8985038
  • Patent Number
    8,985,038
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, June 9, 2011
    13 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, March 24, 2015
    9 years ago
Abstract
A feeder movement compensation algorithm for use within a processor controlled sewing machine. The sewing machine configured with a reciprocating needle and thread, and including a stitch plate upon which fabric to be sewn is positioned beneath the needle and thread. The machine also includes a feeder mechanism driving a feed dog thru a movement. The feed dog movement pushes the fabric along the stitch plate and the reciprocating needle and thread form stitches in the fabric. During the stitch cycle, the feed dog movement completes at least one feeder stroke. The feeder stroke includes a portion of the feed dog extending above the stitch plate and moving along the direction of feed. The feeder stroke thus pushes the fabric along the stitch plate. The compensation algorithm calculates a theoretical feeder stroke length based upon a desired stitch. The compensation algorithm then calculates a modified feeder stroke length using the theoretical feeder stroke length and at least one feeder calibration data element. The modified feeder stroke length is then performed by the feed dog during the stitch cycle to form the stitch.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention


The present invention generally relates to an algorithm and method to modify the feeder movement of a sewing machine. More particularly, the present invention relates to an algorithm and method to modify the feeder movement of a sewing machine based on calibration data to achieve a desired stitch over the configuration and operating range of the machine.


2. Description of the Related Art


A modern sewing machine is able to produce a variety of stitches and seams on demand. During normal operation, the feeding of the fabric into the machine is controlled by a feed dog which is driven by a mechanism. The fabric is moved beneath the sewing needle by the movement of the feed dog.


The sewing machine includes a selection of stitches and seams. A seam is an entity composed of a number of stitches. Advanced sewing machines provide tools for creating new stitch elements by combining existing stitches, or seams. Data for each individual stitch, or seam can be reproduced as a graphic representation on a display, which may be integrated with the sewing machine.


The sewing machine is provided with a processor, a control program, and a memory. The control program may be integral with the processor or stored in memory. The memory is accessible by the processor and may either be accommodated within the machine or may be external. Data for each individual stitch, or seam, is stored in a database within the memory. A display may be provided upon which the graphic elements representing the stitch, or seams, may be displayed to the user.


The user wishes the actual seam that is sewn upon the fabric to look like the stitches selected. During a sewing operation, the fabric is moved across the stitch plate and beneath the reciprocating needle by a feed dog. The feeding of the fabric beneath the sewing needle is critical to achieve the intended stitch size and shape. The feed dog is driven by a feeding mechanism which is synchronized with the needle movement. Many factors effect the actual movement of the fabric relative to the movement of the feed dog. Feeding errors commonly occur in the form of slippage or uneven movement between the feed dog and fabric. The type and magnitude of feeding error is dependent upon many factors. The end result of all feeding errors in passing the fabric beneath the needle results in stitches or seams that are misshapen, or of improper size, and that are not what the user intended.


Due to the problems above in the feeding of fabric to achieve an expected and consistent seam, it would be advantageous to provide an algorithm and method to predict and compensate for feeding errors. Such an algorithm and method would provide for modified feeder movement to achieve the required fabric positioning during the sewing operation. The algorithm and method would insure a consistent stitch size over a variety of fabrics, threads, and operating conditions. It is thus to such a feeder movement compensation algorithm and method that the present invention is primarily directed.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The disadvantages of the prior art are overcome by the present invention which, in one aspect, is a feeder movement compensation algorithm for use within a sewing machine. The sewing machine configured with a reciprocating needle and thread, and including a stitch plate upon which fabric to be sewn is positioned beneath the needle and thread. The machine also includes a feeder mechanism driving a feed dog thru a movement. The feed dog movement pushes the fabric along the stitch plate and the reciprocating needle and thread form stitches in the fabric.


The compensation algorithm includes the sewing machine having a stitch cycle wherein, the needle and thread pierce the fabric to be sewn. The needle then retracts leaving the thread piercing the fabric. The fabric is then moved along the stitch plate by the feed dog movement to a new position beneath the needle, thereby completing the stitch cycle. During the stitch cycle, the feed dog movement completes at least one feeder stroke. The feeder stroke includes a portion of the feed dog extending above the stitch plate and moving along the direction of feed. The feeder stroke thus pushes the fabric along the stitch plate.


The feeder stroke includes a feeder stroke length, a feeder stroke height, and a feeder stroke path. The compensation algorithm calculates a theoretical feeder stroke length based upon a desired stitch. The compensation algorithm then calculates a modified feeder stroke length using the theoretical feeder stroke length and at least one feeder calibration data element. The modified feeder stroke length is then performed by the feed dog during the stitch cycle to form the stitch.


In another aspect of the present invention, the feeder calibration data element includes an operator input data element. The operator input date element including at least one of; a stitch selection, the feed dog type, a presser foot type, a presser foot pressure, a desired speed of feeding, the feeding direction, the type of needle, the needle geometry, the type of fabric, the weight of fabric, the type of thread, the weight of thread, the age of the machine.


In yet another aspect of the present invention, the feeder calibration data element includes a machine measured data element. The machine measured data element including at least one of; a temperature, a thread tension, the feeder mechanism torque, a needle mechanism torque; the feeder mechanism speed, a presser foot type, a presser foot pressure, a presser foot height, a time of operation of the machine, an optical measurement.


In yet another aspect of the present invention, the feeder calibration data element includes a memory stored data element. The memory stored data element including feeding error data relative to at least one of; the feed dog type, presser foot type, a presser foot pressure, feeding speed, feeding direction, needle type, needle geometry, fabric type, fabric weight, thread type, thread weight, machine age.


In yet another aspect of the present invention, the feeder calibration data element includes a memory stored data element. The memory stored data element including feeding error data relative to at least one of; the ambient temperature, thread tension, feeder mechanism power, needle mechanism power; feeder mechanism speed, presser foot pressure, a time of operation of the machine, forward vs. reverse feed balance.


In yet another aspect of the present invention, a plurality of stitches are performed to form a seam. The compensation algorithm calculates a first modified feeder stroke length for one or more discrete stitches within the seam. The compensation algorithm calculates a second modified feeder stroke length for the remaining stitches within the seam.


In yet another aspect of the present invention, the compensation algorithm calculates a modified feeder stroke height using the theoretical feeder stroke length and at least one feeder calibration data element. A memory stored data element includes feeder calibration data relative to feeder stroke height. The modified feeder stroke height is then performed by the feed dog during the stitch cycle to form the stitch.


In yet another aspect of the present invention, the compensation algorithm calculates a modified feeder stroke path using the theoretical feeder stroke length and at least one feeder calibration data element. A memory stored data element includes feeder calibration data relative to feeder stroke path. The modified feeder stroke path is then performed by the feed dog during the stitch cycle to form the stitch.


In yet another aspect of the present invention, a method of feeder movement compensation for use within a sewing machine is presented. The sewing machine configured with a reciprocating needle and thread, and including a stitch plate upon which fabric to be sewn is positioned beneath the needle and thread. The machine also includes a feeder mechanism driving a feed dog thru a movement. The feed dog movement pushes the fabric along the stitch plate and the reciprocating needle and thread form stitches in the fabric.


The compensation algorithm includes the sewing machine having a stitch cycle wherein, the needle and thread pierce the fabric to be sewn. The needle then retracts leaving the thread piercing the fabric. The fabric is then moved along the stitch plate by the feed dog movement to a new position beneath the needle, thereby completing the stitch cycle. During the stitch cycle, the feed dog movement completes at least one feeder stroke. The feeder stroke includes a portion of the feed dog extending above the stitch plate and moving along the direction of feed. The feeder stroke thus pushes the fabric along the stitch plate.


The feeder stroke includes a feeder stroke length, a feeder stroke height, and a feeder stroke path. The compensation algorithm includes the step of calculating the theoretical feeder stroke length based upon a desired stitch. The compensation algorithm also includes the step of calculating a modified feeder stroke length using the theoretical feeder stroke length and at least one feeder calibration data element. The modified feeder stroke length is then performed by the feed dog during the stitch cycle to form the stitch.


In yet another aspect of the present invention, the feeder calibration data element includes an operator input data element. The operator input data element including at least one of; a stitch selection, the feed dog type, a presser foot type, a presser foot pressure, a desired speed of feeding, the feeding direction, the type of needle, the needle geometry, the type of fabric, the weight of fabric, the type of thread, the weight of thread, the age of the machine.


In yet another aspect of the present invention, the feeder calibration data element includes a machine measured data element. The machine measured data element including at least one of; a temperature, a thread tension, the feeder mechanism torque, a needle mechanism torque; the feeder mechanism speed, a presser foot type, a presser foot pressure, a presser foot height, a time of operation of the machine, an optical measurement.


In yet another aspect of the present invention, the feeder calibration data element includes a memory stored data element. The memory stored data element including feeding error data relative to at least one of; the feed dog type, presser foot type, a presser foot pressure, feeding speed, feeding direction, needle type, needle geometry, fabric type, fabric weight, thread type, thread weight, machine age.


In yet another aspect of the present invention, the feeder calibration data element includes a memory stored data element. The memory stored data element including feeding error data relative to at least one of; the ambient temperature, thread tension, feeder mechanism power, needle mechanism power; feeder mechanism speed, presser foot pressure, a time of operation of the machine, forward vs. reverse feed balance.


In yet another aspect of the present invention, a plurality of stitches are performed to form a seam. The step of the compensation algorithm calculating a modified feeder stroke length includes the step of calculating a first modified feeder stroke length for one or more discrete stitches within the seam, and the step of calculating a second modified feeder stroke length for the remaining stitches within the seam.


In yet another aspect of the present invention, the compensation algorithm includes the step of calculating a modified feeder stroke height. The modified feeder stroke height calculated using the theoretical feeder stroke length and at least one feeder calibration data element. The memory stored data element includes feeder calibration data relative to feeder stroke height. And the step of forming a stitch includes performing the modified feeder stroke height.


In yet another aspect of the present invention, the compensation algorithm calculates a modified feeder stroke path. The modified feeder stroke path calculated using the theoretical feeder stroke length and at least one feeder calibration data element. The memory stored data element includes feeder calibration data relative to a feeder stroke path. And the step of forming a stitch includes performing the modified feeder stroke path.


These and other aspects of the invention will become apparent from the following description of the preferred embodiments taken in conjunction with the following drawings. As would be obvious to one skilled in the art, many variations and modifications of the invention may be effected without departing from the spirit and scope of the novel concepts of the disclosure.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a side view of sewing machine head with feeder mechanism.



FIG. 2 is a side view of the sewing machine head of FIG. 1 starting a stitch.



FIG. 3 is a side view of the sewing machine head of FIG. 1 with the feeder mechanism rising above the stitch plate.



FIG. 4 is a side view of the sewing machine head of FIG. 1 with the feeder mechanism and fabric moving across the stitch plate.



FIG. 5 is a side view of the sewing machine head of FIG. 1 with the feeder mechanism dropping below the stitch plate.



FIG. 6 is a side view of the sewing machine head of FIG. 1 completing a first stitch.



FIG. 7 is a side view of the sewing machine head of FIG. 1 starting a second stitch.



FIG. 8 is a side view of the sewing machine head of FIG. 1 with the feeder mechanism rising above the stitch plate.



FIG. 9 is a side view of the sewing machine head of FIG. 1 completing a seam.



FIG. 10 is a side view of the sewing machine head of FIG. 1 depicting the feeder stroke path of one tooth of the feed dog.



FIG. 11 is a side view of the sewing machine head of FIG. 1 depicting a modified feeder stroke path of one tooth of the feed dog.



FIG. 12 is a side view of the sewing machine head of FIG. 1 depicting an actual feeding length vs the feeder stroke length.



FIG. 13 is an example plot of actual feeding length vs the feeder stroke length.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The algorithm and method for feeder movement compensation calculates and then compensates for feeding errors to achieve the desired seam. The algorithm and method provides for modified feeder movement to achieve the required fabric positioning during the sewing operation. The feeder movement compensation results in the desired stitch size over a variety of fabrics, threads, and operating conditions.


With reference to the figures in which like numerals represent like elements throughout, FIG. 1 is side view of a common sewing machine head with feeder mechanism. As depicted in FIG. 1, the sewing machine 10 has a stitch plate 30 which supports the fabric 40 to be sewn. A needle 50 is mounted within the sewing machine and during a sewing operation reciprocates up and down in the direction of Arrow “A”. The needle carries a thread 60 for creating stitches in the fabric 40. A presser foot 70 is positioned above the stitch plate 30 and presses the fabric 40 onto the stitch plate 30. A feed dog 80 is depicted below the stitch plate 30 and is driven by a feeder mechanism for movement relative to the stitch plate 30. The feed dog 80 has multiple serrations or teeth 84 which are designed to engage the underside of the fabric 40. During a sewing operation, each feed dog tooth 84 moves around a curvilinear path 88 to move or feed the fabric 40 to a new position beneath the needle 50. A representative curvilinear path 88 is depicted as dashed lines in FIG. 1 for the first tooth of the feed dog 80. As will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, during the sewing operation the presser foot 70 is always in contact with the fabric. As depicted in FIGS. 1-9, the presser foot may be shown slightly above the fabric for clarity of the stitch being formed.



FIG. 2 depicts the start of a sewing operation. The fabric 40 is supported by the stitch plate 30 as the needle 50 pierces it. The needle 50 passes into an opening within the stitch plate 30 and does not contact the stitch plate. The needle 50 and thread 60 have pierced the fabric 40 and the needle is moving upward in the direction of Arrow “B”. As further depicted in FIG. 2, the feed dog 80 moves up and to the right in the direction of Arrow “C”.


As depicted in FIG. 3, the needle retracts from the fabric in the direction of Arrow “D” leaving the thread embedded within the fabric. The feed dog 80 moves up and to the left in the direction of Arrow “E” and begins to protrude over the upper surface of the stitch plate 30.


As depicted in FIG. 4, the needle is fully refracted and the feed dog 80 extends above the stitch plate 30 and moves in the direction of Arrow “F”. The teeth 84 of the feed dog 80 contact the underside of the fabric 40 and move the fabric in the direction of Arrow “H”.


As depicted in FIG. 5, the feed dog 80 moves down and to the left in the direction of Arrow “K” and drops below the upper surface of the stitch plate 30. The needle is moving downward in the direction of Arrow “J”. The fabric 30 is now in position to be pierced by the needle to form a new stitch in the seam. The feeder motion of FIGS. 3, 4, and 5, wherein the feed dog extends above the stitch plate 30, moves in the feed direction, and then drops below the stitch plate is defined as a feeder stroke. The feeder stroke therefore having a curvilinear path over the stitch plate 30.


As depicted in FIG. 6, the needle 50 has plunged through the fabric 40 in the direction of Arrow “M”. A stitch 90 has been formed through the fabric and a stitch cycle has been completed by the machine. The feed dog 80 moves down and to the right in the direction of Arrow “L” below the stitch plate 30.


As depicted in FIG. 7, the needle 50 has again begun moving upward in the direction of Arrow “B” leaving the thread 60 embedded within the fabric 30. The feed dog 80 again moves up and to the right in the direction of Arrow “C”.


As depicted in FIG. 8, the needle again retracts from the fabric in the direction of Arrow “D”. The feed dog 80 moves up and to the left in the direction of Arrow “E” and begins to protrude over the upper surface of the stitch plate 30. The sewing machine will now proceed thru the motions of FIGS. 4, 5, and 6 to complete the second stitch in the seam.


As depicted in FIG. 9, a total of four stitches 60 have been completed within the fabric 40 to form a seam. The seam has a total length represented by Dimension “P”.


As depicted in FIG. 10, the feeder mechanism of the sewing machine moves the feed dog such that a representative tooth 84 moves through a curvilinear path of motion depicted as dashed curve 88. The portion of the curvilinear path 88 which extends above the stitch plate 30 is defined as the feeder stroke path 90 and is shown pictorially as solid curve “R”. The feeder stroke “R” having a feeder stroke length, and having a maximum height above the top of the stitch plate called the feeder stroke height. As depicted in FIG. 11, the feeder mechanism of the sewing machine allows changing the path of motion of the feed dog from that forming the feeder stroke R to a modified feeder stroke length R2. The horizontal component of the feeder stroke path 90 is called the feeder stroke length. The length of fabric fed beneath the needle with each feeder stroke may be controlled by the feeder stroke length. The ability to control the fabric feed rate allows the sewing machine to create different stitch lengths. The feeder stroke length may be changed dynamically during operation of the machine and the feeder stroke length used for individual stitches may be different within a seam. As will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, the elliptical path shown in FIGS. 10 and 11 is an idealized geometry. In practice, the feeder movement curve is a series of tangential arcs and the feeder curve may have sections of straight line, or very nearly straight line movement.


As depicted in FIG. 12, for any desired seam, a feeder stroke length may be calculated. However in operation, the actual length of fabric fed beneath the needle between stitches is not the same as the feeder stroke length. As used herein, feeding length and stitch length have the same meaning. The difference between the feeder stroke length and the actual stitch length may be defined as the feeding error. The actual stitch length may also be called the practical stitch length. One of the reasons for not feeding the same stitch length as the feeder stroke length is that the geometry of the feeder stroke is oval. Creating a mechanically rectangular feeder movement results in better practical stitch length, but the mechanism for created such feeder movement is more complicated and more noisy in operation. Other factors contributing to feeder error are the tolerances and wear within the feeder mechanism, the height the feeder mechanism extends above the stitch plate, and the actual feeder stroke path that results from the feeder mechanism geometry.


Many factors affect the feeder stroke length vs actual stitch or feeding length; the speed with which the fabric is fed by the feeder, the temperature of the fabric and feeder mechanism, the weight of the fabric per unit area, the thickness of the fabric, the stiffness of the fabric, the thread count of the fabric, the weight of the thread per inch, the stiffness of the thread, and the diameter of the thread. For example, a thick canvas fabric will behave differently than a sheer cotton fabric. Stated another way, the amount of fabric moved beneath the needle for a given feeder stroke length for a thick canvas fabric will be different than that of the sheer cotton. The canvas and cotton fabrics each have a different density, stiffness, friction with the feeder and stitch plate, and a differing thread tension during the sewing cycle.


The number and configuration of feed teeth on the feeder will result in different feeding lengths. A feeder configuration may exhibit a more idealized feed length with some fabrics than with others. Yet another variable may be the total time which the sewing machine has been in operation. The feeder mechanism may wear over time resulting in a change in actual stitch length when compared to the feeder stroke length.


Another variable that may affect the feeder stroke length vs the actual feeding length is the presser foot design and pressure. Different models of presser feet in combinations with the variables above may result in different actual feed lengths. The pressure which the presser foot exerts upon the fabric surface will also affect the feeding. As yet another variable, a machine may be equipped with dual feeding, i.e. a top feeder may be added, or a machine may only use top feeding.


One example dataset of the actual feeding length vs the feeder stroke length is plotted in the diagram of FIG. 13. In FIG. 13, forward feeding is shown, but a similar feeding error will occur in reverse feeding. The first curve shows an example of a machine combination exhibiting perfect feed were the feeder stroke length and actual feed length are always the same. The second curve shows an example sewing machine with uncorrected feeding error. The third and fourth curves shows practical upper and lower specification limits on the feeding error. As be seen FIG. 13, the actual feeding length may be greater than, or less than, the feeder stroke length.


In one embodiment of present invention, to compensate for the feeding error within the sewing machine processor, the sewing machine designer must gather knowledge of the error over the various operating and configuration variables encountered. The knowledge may be called feeder calibration data. The feeding error for a given set of configuration and operating variables is found by feeding with a theoretical feeder stroke length (tl) and then measuring the practical feeding length (pl). The theoretical feeder stroke length is calculated assuming perfect feed during the feeder stroke wherein the fabric movement along the stitch plate will be equal to the feeder stroke length. The feeding error (fe) is then equal to the difference in the theoretical feeder stroke length and the practical length. fe=tl−pl (mm).


As will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, the feeder mechanism is commonly driven with a stepper motor having a finite number of steps per revolution. With knowledge of the feeder mechanism, the feeder stroke length resulting from each rotational step of the stepper motor is known. By knowing the feeder stroke per step resolution X (mm/step) it is possible to calculate the number of steps that should be used for a given theoretical feeder stroke length tl. The theoretical stroke length divided by the feeder stroke per step resolution X will yield the number of steps that should be used to feed tl mm. N=tl/X However, with knowledge of the feeding error fe, to achieve the desired practical feed length, only (tl+fe)/X steps shall be used. As will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, other drive components may be used within the feeder mechanism such as linear actuators, rotary actuators, electric motors of all types, and encoders.


As one Example: the theoretical feeder stroke length is initially calculated to be 6 mm for a desired seam. tl=6 mm The measured practical stitch length that results from this feeder stroke is 6.3 mm. pl=6.3 mm Therefore the feeding error fe=tl−pl gives fe=6−6.3 mm=−0.3 mm feeding error. The feeder stroke per step resolution of the device is X=0.1 mm/step. To achieve the desired stitch length, the machine should use a modified feeder stroke length of (tl+fe)/X=(6+(−0.3))/0.1=57 steps. Without knowledge of the feeder error, 60 steps of rotation would have been used resulting in stitches 6.3 mm long.


In another embodiment of the present invention, by predicting the feeding error for a given set of variables we may compensate for the feeding error across the whole seam. This is far superior when compared to correcting the stitch length at some localized stitch along the seam. When the seam desired does not result in a whole number of steps of the stepper motor per stitch, successive stitches within the seam may use a different number of steps to achieve the desired average stitch length. Referencing the example above, if the feed error is −0.25 mm. The feeder drive would then need a modified feeder stroke length of 57.5 steps. Incremental steps are difficult with a stepper motor drive mechanism. The machine processor will instead use 57 steps, then 58 steps, for successive stitches along the seam.


In another embodiment of the present invention, to obtain feeder calibration data for a given configuration, the first thing is to balance the machine mechanically by adjusting the machine so that for a certain stitch length, for example 3 mm, the forward and the backward feeder stroke lengths are exactly the same. The next step is to create an arbitrary number of seams that are sewn forward and reverse with a predefined fabric, thread, needle, presser foot and speed. The seams consist of Y stitches where all stitches have the same length within the seam. The seams to be sewn are presented in Table 1, and Table II presents the resulting forward and reverse feed errors.














TABLE I







Seam
Stitch length
Number stitches
Seam length









1
1 mm
60
60 mm



2
3 mm
20
60 mm



3
6 mm
10
60 mm





















TABLE II






Forward seam

Reverse seam



Seam
length
Forward fe
length
Reverse fe







1
58 mm
2 mm
55 mm
5 mm


2
59 mm
1 mm
58 mm
2 mm


3
66 mm
−6 mm 
63 mm
−3 mm 









The feeder calibration data of Tables I and II is then stored within the machine memory. During machine operation, the feeding errors are used as input in a feed compensation algorithm executed as part of the machine control program by the machine processor to calculate a modified feeder stroke length.


In another embodiment of the present invention, feeder calibration data may be obtained for any of the configurations and variables identified above for use in the feed compensation algorithm. Some variables above may be studied singularly, and their individual effect on feeding error measured. The effect of other variables may be measured as a group, and the feeding error correction for the group of variables used in the compensation algorithm.


In another embodiment of the present invention, the feeder calibration data used within the feed compensation algorithm will be at least one of three types; data input by the machine operator, data as measured by the sewing machine processor, or data as input by the machine manufacturer and stored in the machine memory. Examples of data input by the machine operator or user may include; a stitch selection, the feed dog type, a presser foot type, a presser foot pressure, a desired speed of feeding, the feeding direction, the type of needle, the needle geometry, the type of fabric, the weight of fabric, the type of thread, the weight of thread, the age of the machine. In one embodiment, the operator may input the weight and type of fabric being sewn. The feed compensation algorithm may then use memory stored data to obtain feeder calibration data associated with the type and weight of fabric.


In another embodiment, examples of data as measured by the sewing machine processor, also referred to herein as machine measured data, may include; a temperature, a thread tension, the feeder mechanism torque, a needle mechanism torque; the feeder mechanism speed, a presser foot type, a presser foot pressure, a presser foot height, a time of operation of the machine, an optical measurement. In one embodiment, the processor may measure the feeder mechanism current and voltage to determine the power being drawn by the feeder mechanism during the sewing cycle. The measured power may then be used with memory stored data within the feed compensation algorithm. In another embodiment, an optical sensor may be utilized to interrogate the stitches as they are created. The processor may then use the optical data within the feed compensation algorithm.


In yet another embodiment of the present invention, examples of memory stored data may include feeder calibration data relative to; the feed dog type, presser foot type, a presser foot pressure, feeding speed, feeding direction, needle type, needle geometry, fabric type, fabric weight, thread type, thread weight, machine age, the ambient temperature, thread tension, feeder mechanism power, needle mechanism power; feeder mechanism speed, presser foot pressure, a time of operation of the machine, forward vs. reverse feed balance.


As will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, multiple data sets may be measured and stored in machine memory to fully quantify and calibrate the machine feed. The data entities above may be stored in memory as tabular data. The compensation algorithm may calculate a curve fit approximation for any of the date elements above. The curve approximation may then be used to estimate compensation values between, or as an extension of, the data points.


In alternative embodiments of the invention, any combination of the variables identified above may be considered by the software and used in the feeding error calculation. The user may input any combination of the operator input data. In one embodiment, the compensation algorithm may approximate the stiffness of the fabric when the user selects the type of fabric and fabric weight from a pull down menu. In another embodiment, the machine may dynamically measure one of the variables above during the sewing operation. For example, the temperature of the ambient air may be measured by the machine and dynamically used in the feed error correction. In another example, the thread tension may be measured by the machine and dynamically used in the feed error correction. A plurality of feeder calibration data may be used by the feed compensation algorithm to calculate the appropriate modified feeder stroke length.


As may be appreciated by those skilled in the art, other feeder mechanisms may be utilized to move the feed dog beneath the fabric. In one alternative embodiment of the invention, the feeder stroke height may be altered by the compensation algorithm based upon feeder calibration data. In another alternative embodiment of the present invention, the feeder mechanism allows the shape of the curvilinear path of the feed dog, or the feeder stroke path, to be altered by the compensation algorithm based upon feeder calibration data.


While there has been shown a preferred embodiment of the present invention, it is to be understood that certain changes may be made in the forms and arrangement of the algorithm and steps of the method for feeder movement compensation without departing from the underlying spirit and scope of the invention.

Claims
  • 1. A method of stitching using a processor-controlled sewing machine having a feed dog, a stepper motor, and a memory, the method comprising: activating a stitch length compensation computer program stored in the memory, the stitch length compensation computer program having an algorithm for determining a modified feeder stroke length based upon a calculated modified feeder stroke length, the algorithm having the steps of: determining a number of stepper motor revolutions required to move the feed dog a theoretical feeder stroke distance corresponding to a desired stitch length;determining a feeder stroke distance error;calculating the number of stepper motor revolutions corresponding to the feeder stroke distance error;calculating a calculated modified feeder stroke distance by modifying the theoretical feeder stroke distance by the feeder stroke distance error;determining at least one modified feeder stroke length based upon the calculated modified feeder stroke length;determining the number of stepper motor revolutions corresponding to the at least one modified feeder stroke length;executing the stitch length compensation computer program to cause the stepper motor to perform the number of revolutions corresponding to the at least one modified feeder stroke length; andforming a stitch of the desired length.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the feeder stroke distance error is determined from calibration data comprising at least one of an operator-input data component, a machine-measured data component, and a manufacturer-measured data component.
  • 3. The method of claim 2, wherein two modified feeder stroke lengths are calculated from the calculated modified feeder stroke length.
  • 4. The method of claim 3, wherein the sewing program causes a first modified feeder stroke to form a stitch of a first length and causes a second modified feeder stroke length to form a stitch of a second length, where the average length of the first stitch length and the second stitch length equal the desired stitch length.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/352,827, filed on Jun. 9, 2010, the entirety of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (162)
Number Name Date Kind
3570426 Kunes Mar 1971 A
3585950 Ito Jun 1971 A
3613608 Hinerfeld et al. Oct 1971 A
3613610 Hinerfeld et al. Oct 1971 A
3693561 Hrinko, Jr. et al. Sep 1972 A
3712254 Beamish et al. Jan 1973 A
3727567 Beazley Apr 1973 A
3799087 Beamish et al. Mar 1974 A
3815531 Wurst et al. Jun 1974 A
3818849 Maddox, Jr. Jun 1974 A
3904890 Wenrich et al. Sep 1975 A
3967566 Spiegel et al. Jul 1976 A
4051794 Herzer et al. Oct 1977 A
4073247 Cunningham et al. Feb 1978 A
4092937 Landau, Jr. et al. Jun 1978 A
4100865 Landau, Jr. et al. Jul 1978 A
4104976 Landau, Jr. et al. Aug 1978 A
4108090 Landau, Jr. et al. Aug 1978 A
4116145 Nicolay Sep 1978 A
4133275 Herzer et al. Jan 1979 A
4154179 Arnold May 1979 A
4160422 Barber et al. Jul 1979 A
4181085 Conner, Jr. Jan 1980 A
4185575 Brown et al. Jan 1980 A
4195582 Novick et al. Apr 1980 A
4214540 Cook Jul 1980 A
4221176 Besore et al. Sep 1980 A
4351254 Brown Sep 1982 A
4352334 Childs et al. Oct 1982 A
4359008 Newman Nov 1982 A
4365565 Kawai et al. Dec 1982 A
4373458 Dorosz et al. Feb 1983 A
4373459 Dunn et al. Feb 1983 A
4391215 Sansone Jul 1983 A
4393343 Angersbach et al. Jul 1983 A
4412498 Scholl Nov 1983 A
4457246 Hanyu et al. Jul 1984 A
4503794 Ishihara et al. Mar 1985 A
4507596 Angersbach et al. Mar 1985 A
4509443 Martell et al. Apr 1985 A
4513676 Martell et al. Apr 1985 A
4519331 Kosrow et al. May 1985 A
4526114 Martell et al. Jul 1985 A
4526116 Ma/ nnel Jul 1985 A
4555997 Tancs Dec 1985 A
4557207 Turner et al. Dec 1985 A
4563964 Sjodin Jan 1986 A
4612867 Rosch et al. Sep 1986 A
4622907 Kimura Nov 1986 A
4648337 Mall Mar 1987 A
4682554 Goto et al. Jul 1987 A
4686917 Braun Aug 1987 A
4706584 Senda et al. Nov 1987 A
4726307 Yamauchi Feb 1988 A
4726309 Popp Feb 1988 A
4742786 Hashimoto et al. May 1988 A
4748920 Stutznacker Jun 1988 A
4757773 Nomura et al. Jul 1988 A
4777896 Nomura Oct 1988 A
4781130 Badowski Nov 1988 A
4794875 Noguchi et al. Jan 1989 A
4803937 Hiramatsu et al. Feb 1989 A
4815406 Brown et al. Mar 1989 A
4834008 Sadeh et al. May 1989 A
4841891 Hashimoto et al. Jun 1989 A
4849902 Yokoe et al. Jul 1989 A
4860678 Skogward Aug 1989 A
4867082 Sabbioni et al. Sep 1989 A
4867087 Suzuki et al. Sep 1989 A
4901660 Takeuchi et al. Feb 1990 A
4932343 Mardix et al. Jun 1990 A
4982677 Nomura et al. Jan 1991 A
4995328 Tanaka Feb 1991 A
5000105 Tanaka Mar 1991 A
5012752 Murata et al. May 1991 A
5018466 Hasegawa May 1991 A
5095835 Jernigan et al. Mar 1992 A
5138962 Klundt Aug 1992 A
5146862 Sato et al. Sep 1992 A
5156106 Suzuki et al. Oct 1992 A
5156107 Kyuno et al. Oct 1992 A
5184560 Asano Feb 1993 A
5270939 Goldberg et al. Dec 1993 A
5303665 Hausammann Apr 1994 A
5319565 Hausammann et al. Jun 1994 A
5323722 Goto et al. Jun 1994 A
5347940 Hori et al. Sep 1994 A
5389868 Mikami et al. Feb 1995 A
5410976 Matsubara May 1995 A
5474005 Yamauchi et al. Dec 1995 A
5477795 Nakayama et al. Dec 1995 A
5537939 Horton Jul 1996 A
5537946 Sadeh et al. Jul 1996 A
5562059 Yamauchi et al. Oct 1996 A
5571240 Yamauchi et al. Nov 1996 A
5588383 Davis et al. Dec 1996 A
5592891 Muto Jan 1997 A
5603272 Takahashi et al. Feb 1997 A
5653186 Yamauchi et al. Aug 1997 A
5701830 Muto Dec 1997 A
5740055 Iwata Apr 1998 A
5755240 Schonborn May 1998 A
5791270 Mori Aug 1998 A
5911182 Uyama et al. Jun 1999 A
5924372 Okuda et al. Jul 1999 A
5974997 Amburgey Nov 1999 A
6032595 Okuyama Mar 2000 A
6131526 Iida et al. Oct 2000 A
6135038 Okamoto Oct 2000 A
6189989 Hirabayashi et al. Feb 2001 B1
6202001 Muto Mar 2001 B1
6209468 Marcangelo et al. Apr 2001 B1
6293210 Freeman et al. Sep 2001 B1
6321670 Tomita et al. Nov 2001 B1
6381818 Freeman et al. May 2002 B1
6450110 Bruhl et al. Sep 2002 B1
6718893 Kong Apr 2004 B1
6718895 Fortuna Apr 2004 B1
6729255 Ton et al. May 2004 B2
6732668 Zesch et al. May 2004 B2
6776112 Bruehl et al. Aug 2004 B2
6823807 Zesch et al. Nov 2004 B2
6871605 Zesch et al. Mar 2005 B1
6871606 Schweizer Mar 2005 B2
6883446 Koerner Apr 2005 B2
6883449 Burrell et al. Apr 2005 B2
6963790 Mizuno et al. Nov 2005 B2
6983192 Block et al. Jan 2006 B2
6994042 Schweizer Feb 2006 B2
7210417 Koerner May 2007 B2
7212880 Mizuno et al. May 2007 B2
7240628 Friman et al. Jul 2007 B2
7308333 Kern et al. Dec 2007 B2
7412936 Price et al. Aug 2008 B2
7460925 Noguchi Dec 2008 B2
7793602 Koemer Sep 2010 B2
7814832 Franz Oct 2010 B2
8261679 Ihira et al. Sep 2012 B2
8387547 Bardh et al. Mar 2013 B2
20020020334 Bruhl et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020043202 Freeman et al. Apr 2002 A1
20030140829 Zesch et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030140831 Zesch et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030140832 Ton et al. Jul 2003 A1
20040099191 Bruehl et al. May 2004 A1
20040210336 Block et al. Oct 2004 A1
20050016428 Koerner Jan 2005 A1
20060064195 Kern et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060213413 Koerner Sep 2006 A1
20070204781 Noguchi Sep 2007 A1
20070245940 Wahlstrom Oct 2007 A1
20070256619 Koemer Nov 2007 A1
20100224111 Ihira et al. Sep 2010 A1
20110005441 Roche Jan 2011 A1
20110041746 Eklund et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110146553 Wilhelmsson et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110168070 Lanquist Jul 2011 A1
20120060733 Maki et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120060734 Yamanashi et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120234222 Naka Sep 2012 A1
20130014682 Brindzik Jan 2013 A1
20130042797 Bondesson et al. Feb 2013 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (54)
Number Date Country
1081544 Jul 1980 CA
2515406 Aug 2004 CA
102007001073 Aug 2007 DE
77788 May 1983 EP
103364 Mar 1984 EP
117713 Sep 1984 EP
124211 Nov 1984 EP
366140 May 1990 EP
515131 Nov 1992 EP
564771 Oct 1993 EP
857228 Aug 1998 EP
1184502 Mar 2002 EP
1777331 Apr 2007 EP
2226419 Sep 2010 EP
1320764 Jun 1973 GB
1349994 Apr 1974 GB
1375540 Nov 1974 GB
1393294 May 1975 GB
1440350 Jun 1976 GB
1475791 Jun 1977 GB
1526209 Sep 1978 GB
1547931 Jul 1979 GB
1547932 Jul 1979 GB
1547933 Jul 1979 GB
1547934 Jul 1979 GB
1568486 May 1980 GB
1570241 Jun 1980 GB
1570242 Jun 1980 GB
1570243 Jun 1980 GB
1570244 Jun 1980 GB
1570245 Jun 1980 GB
1571736 Jul 1980 GB
2043124 Oct 1980 GB
1583629 Jan 1981 GB
2157723 Oct 1985 GB
2168085 Jun 1986 GB
2177520 Jan 1987 GB
2204604 Nov 1988 GB
1212591 Aug 1989 JP
02055080 Feb 1990 JP
6304359 Nov 1994 JP
2000167277 Jun 2000 JP
2000342869 Dec 2000 JP
2009011594 Jan 2009 JP
2009233435 Oct 2009 JP
2010185151 Aug 2010 JP
198800714 Apr 1988 KR
8901067 Feb 1989 WO
9715708 May 1997 WO
0104405 Jan 2001 WO
2004072349 Aug 2004 WO
2006071786 Jul 2006 WO
2007143062 Dec 2007 WO
2010144013 Dec 2010 WO
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20110303138 A1 Dec 2011 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61352827 Jun 2010 US