This patent application is the national phase of PCT/EP2017/065963, filed Jun. 28, 2017, which claims the benefit of European Patent Application 16177989.7, filed Jul. 5, 2016. Each of the foregoing applications are incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Felting needles and methods for the production thereof are known. Felting needles are used to change the density of randomly oriented fibres. In most cases, the fibres are compacted to form felted fabrics. For this purpose, felting needles are suspended by way of a mounting (often termed “foot” and frequently consisting of a bent part of the needle shank) from a needle board. Except for their foot, felting needles are often elongate needles that often end in a point at their working end (the end of the needle closer to the fibres).
Part of the needle's aforementioned length is taken up by the working part, adjoined frequently by the point of the needle. As a rule, this working part has a specially formed cross-sectional area (very often, polygonal shapes such as triangles or squares are used). However, round shapes—such as teardrops—are also known for these cross-sectional areas. The working part has barbs which run from the outside profile of the cross-sectional area of the working part towards the interior thereof. These barbs are often made by a cutting action known as barbing. The barbing of felting needles is described, among other publications, in U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,224,067 B and 2,495,926 B. It is evident particularly from the drawings of these publications that the barbing process also produces barbing beads, which are important for the barbs' mode of operation outlined below. The aforementioned barbs hold the textile fibres during a working cycle of the needle board, which consists in a movement of the needle board relative to the textile fibres. The barbs are accordingly of major importance during felting. The barbing beads enhance the aforementioned holding function of the barbs.
The needle boards perform a large number of working cycles per time unit during felting. It is accordingly not surprising that felting needles are exposed to a high load, in particular as a result of their contact with the textile fibres. Increasing the durability or service life of felting needles is accordingly one of the subjects which professional circles have already been working on for a lengthy period of time. To solve this problem, the publication U.S. Pat. No. 2,678,484 B suggests providing felting needles, which have a plurality of successive barbs lengthwise of the needle, with a leading barb which is located closest to the needle point, is less pronounced and also has a less pronounced barbing bead than the barbs spaced further away from the point. The already mentioned publication U.S. Pat. No. 2,495,926 B attempts to solve the problem in a different way: thanks to a specially shaped barbing tool, the barbing bead is broader and is accordingly able to withstand the continuous friction of the textile fibres for a longer period of time.
The technical teaching of the publication U.S. Pat. No. 3,224,067 B, which has also already been mentioned, is based on a different problem: in order to enable efficient and damage-free needling of fine textiles, the width of the barbs and their barbing beads is adjusted by providing the cross-sectional profile of the needle's working parts with ridges that extend along the entire length of the working part.
The ridges or edges of the aforementioned publication are produced by swaging. Barbs are subsequently struck into these ridges such that the barbs and their beads have the width of the ridges in the needle's circumferential direction. It is unlikely that the service life of the barbs and their beads can be increased in the described manner because of their very exposed position on the filigree ridges.
The objective of this invention is to increase the service life of felting needles. The present invention is based on the last-mentioned publication and achieves the objective by combining the features described herein.
As already mentioned, most felting needles have a working part with a cross-sectional area which extends in the radial (r) and circumferential direction ((p) of the felting needle and is bounded over much of the length of the working part by a cross-sectional profile. In this context, “much of the length of the working part” generally means that the working part deviates only in the areas bordering on the shank of the needle and/or on the working-end extremity of the needle (as a rule, the point) and in the area of barbs and barbing beads. This is advantageous because the working part of the felting needles is intended to dip into the fibres, the barbs, in particular, and maybe the barbing beads, being intended to engage the fibres. Accordingly, it is mainly or exclusively the barbs and maybe the barbing beads that penetrate into or deviate from the cross-sectional profile of the working part.
In the working part, at least one barb penetrates into the cross-sectional profile. The barb in this context is formed by an incut running from the cross-sectional profile towards the interior of the felting needle or towards the axis of the needle. One might also say that, as a rule, felting-needle barbs run in radial and axial direction from the outer contour of the cross-sectional profile towards the interior and maybe the symmetry axis of the felting needles.
As also already mentioned, most felting needles have barbing beads in the area of the barbs, which were formed by material displacement during barbing. These barbing beads project beyond the aforementioned contour in the needle's radial direction. Accordingly, they contribute substantially to felting.
Conventional felting needles, which, as a rule, have the aforementioned features, are refined according to the present invention by the following features:
The at least one bulge may be provided during production of the working part. It may, however, also be created advantageously by means of a successive production process. The bulge only projects radially beyond the cross-sectional profile in a part of the extent of the working part in the longitudinal direction of the felting needle. The bulge is accordingly not a part of the cross-sectional profile that is constant over a large part of the working part or even over the entire working part. The bulge is, furthermore, not an edge or a ridge in the sense of the U.S. Pat. No. 3,224,067 B, as these components of the needle also run along the entire working part.
The bulge has at least volume constituents that do not belong to the barbing bead, i.e. were not created as a result of volume displacement during the barbing process. As a rule, however, the bulge is reinforced by the barbing bead, which is advantageous.
It is particularly advantageous if the barb adjoins the outer surface of the bulge lengthwise of the felting needle. The barb can do this if it is located in front of or behind the bulge as seen in the forward direction of the needle during felting. If the bulge is produced before the barb, it is advantageous to strike the barb either directly in front of the commencement of the bulge or even into the barb in such a way that the barb again directly adjoins the (maybe new) outer surface of the bulge but that no left-over part of the bulge remains on the other side of the barb. One might also say that the barb may penetrate advantageously into the original outer surface of the bulge. It is also possible to have a small gap between the barb and the bulge (examples: less than the length of the barb in the needle's longitudinal direction (z), preferably less than half the length of the barb in this direction (z), or, for an even greater advantage, less than a quarter of the length of the barb opening in the needle's longitudinal direction). It is advantageous for the barb and the bulge to have the same position in the circumferential direction and/or to be located on an edge.
The already mentioned radial direction (r) of the needle is often called the “elevational direction”. It is to advantage if the height of the at least one bulge varies lengthwise of the needle. It is advantageous, for example, if, in the plane defined by the longitudinal extent and the radial direction of the needle, the bulge has a convex profile (as seen from the needle's symmetry axis). An angular profile may also have advantages. In both cases, it is advantageous if the height of the bulge has localized maxima. It is advantageous if the bulge has its maximum height at a distance from the barb's inflection point which is at least 25% or, even better, at least 30% of the entire longitudinal extent of the bulge. It is of advantage to produce the bulge by means of a non-machining process—for example a swaging process—or to produce the bulge at least partly by means of such a process. It is expedient in this context if the dies, or at least one die, is moved predominantly in the circumferential direction and/or the radial direction of the needle. However, the at least one bulge may also be created during the forming process by which the cross-sectional profile of the working part is produced, or even during production of the blank.
It is advantageous if at least parts of the bulge taper as the height of the bulge (=radial distance from the needle's axis) increases. Depending on the type of application of the felting needles, it will prove advantageous if the first barb is located on that side of a first bulge that is nearer, lengthwise of the needle, to the needle point. However, there are also needles—so-called reverse-barb needles or U-needles—where the barbs are advantageously located on the side further away, lengthwise (z) of the needle, from the needle point.
It is of advantage if, in this direction (direction of the first barb as viewed from the first bulge), no further bulge is located lengthwise of the needle over a given distance (measured, for example, from the lip of the barb). This applies particularly to bulges that overlap in the circumferential direction ((p) with the barb.
Examples of advantageous minimum distances such as these are:
It is advantageous if the bulge already exists (for example, already in the needle blank) or is formed prior to striking of the barb. It is of further advantage to position the barb such that, during striking of the barb, the barbing tool also displaces some of the bulge, thereby increasing the size of the bulge in the radial and/or circumferential direction(s) of the needle (a barbing bead is again formed in the area of the bulge and reinforces it). This effect may be achieved by applying the tool in the immediate vicinity of the bulge or even in contact therewith.
It is of advantage if the at least one bulge is located at a point on the needle's surface at which the boundary of the cross-sectional profile of the working part is especially far from the needle's axis. This is the case in the area of edges or corners. If this design principle is adhered to, the at least one bulge will project beyond the already exposed edge or the exposed corner in such a way as to make very intense contact with the fibres during felting.
If and in so far as the bulge is a swaged bulge, it is advantageous to create it using at least two pressing tools. These two pressing tools act, at least predominantly, in the needle's circumferential direction. As a rule, however, the direction of action will also contain components in the needle's radial direction. The two pressing tools act in opposite directions and can be moved by the same amount or by different amounts. It is also possible in this context for one tool simply to act as a stop while the other(s) is/are moved.
It is advantageous if the bulge is provided with a clearly defined bounding surface in the needle's radial direction. This shaping of the bounding surface in the needle's radial direction may extend to a defined height setting for the bulge. This measure is accordingly advantageous for all embodiments of the needles disclosed and claimed in this publication. Shaping may be performed with a die which acts at least predominantly in the needle's radial direction. A die which acts at least predominantly in the radial direction has a working surface which acts predominantly in the radial direction. The die may be moved predominantly in the radial direction. However, it may also serve as a stop that prevents further radial growth of the bulge. Example: a radially acting stop of this kind prevents further growth of the bulge due to a swaging process in which the pressing tools act predominantly in the circumferential direction and thus displace the material of the bulge in the radial direction. In this case, the radially acting die serves as a stop for the displaced material of the bulge. The radially acting stop or die may also be structurally connected with at least one of the pressing tools (possibly even integrally) that act predominantly in the needle's radial direction and are able to create the bulge if this is a swaged bulge.
The following drawings show further embodiments of the invention.
The needle 1 shown in
In addition to the aforementioned features,
In
In the embodiment according to
This example, too, makes it clear that a very large number of felting needle variants can be produced using the described method.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
16177989 | Jul 2016 | EP | regional |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2017/065963 | 6/28/2017 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2018/007221 | 1/11/2018 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2495926 | Foster | Jan 1950 | A |
2678484 | Brown | May 1954 | A |
2696035 | Foster | Dec 1954 | A |
3224067 | Foster | Dec 1965 | A |
3307238 | Foster | Mar 1967 | A |
3390440 | Foster | Jul 1968 | A |
3464097 | Zocher | Sep 1969 | A |
3641636 | Foster | Feb 1972 | A |
3762004 | Shepard | Oct 1973 | A |
3913189 | Foster | Oct 1975 | A |
3983611 | Zocher | Oct 1976 | A |
4030170 | Eckhardt | Jun 1977 | A |
4156305 | Foster | May 1979 | A |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report dated Aug. 16, 2017 for corresponding Application No. PCT/EP2017/065963 (14 pages). |
Written Decision of the International Preliminary Examining Authority dated Jun. 26, 2018 for corresponding Application No. PCT/EP2017/065963 (7 pages). |
Extended European Search Report dated Dec. 5, 2016 for corresponding Application No. 16177989.7 (7 pages). |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Sep. 25, 2018 for corresponding Application No. PCT/EP2017/065963, with English Translation (41 pages). |
European Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) dated Mar. 22, 2019, in corresponding European Application No. 16177989.7, with machine English translation (10 pgs.). |
European Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) dated Mar. 26, 2020, in corresponding European Application No. 16177989.7, with machine English translation (8 pgs.). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190301066 A1 | Oct 2019 | US |