This application claims priority of German Patent Application No. 10 2004 024 473.1 filed on May 14, 2004.
The present invention relates to a femoral head cap implant including a device to electrically stimulate the growth of bone tissue and maintain its vital condition.
It is known that a low-frequency electrical alternating current of a frequency ranging from approximately 8 to 20 Hz can promote tissue growth, in particular bone growth (method pursuant to Kraus-Lechner). The alternating current is applied by at least two tissue electrodes coupled to the terminals of an implanted coil (“pick-up coil”). Comparable to a transformer, the alternating current in the pick-up coil is induced by an external coil, which is in turn fed a low-frequency alternating voltage by a suitable generator (DE-A-31 32 488). The present invention also makes use of this method.
Hip joint shaft prostheses which integrate a pick-up coil and tissue electrodes to stimulate bone growth and prevent loosening are also already known (EP-A-0 781 532).
A brochure from the midland medical technologies company describes a metal-on-metal femoral head cap system developed in association with Derek McMinn FRCS, which does away with the need to replace the entire femoral neck with a prosthesis, but instead has a metal cap placed atop the bone of the hip joint head which has been appropriately excised to receive it. The metal cap is fixed by a pin mounted to its inside implanted in the femoral neck. Such cap prostheses are superior to shaft prostheses in that they effect virtually no discernible change to the geometry of the thigh bone. As studies conducted in the 1980s have shown, however, femoral head bones frequently necrotize under the metal cap within just three to four years, and the metal cap thereby loses its hold. It must then be replaced by a femoral shaft prosthesis with the shaft being anchored in the thigh bone.
Because of the different configurations involved, the stimulation devices known in conjunction with hip prostheses of the type specified above cannot be applied to a femoral head cap system.
The object of the present invention is to provide a femoral head cap system which prevents necrotizing of the bone covered by the metal cap and which maintains bone tissue vitality.
This object is achieved in accordance with the invention by the measures the claims hereto protect as described in the following using examples of embodiments.
The inventive stimulation device is advantageous in that a distribution of current is attained in a femoral head cap system which prevents the necrotizing of the covered bone and preserves bone tissue in its vitality. This thereby solves the problem of the long-term viability of femoral head cap prostheses.
The invention will be described in further detail below with reference to exemplary embodiments in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, which show:
The femoral head cap implant 10 depicted in
Cap component 12 and pin 14 are comprised of a tissue-compatible metal, in particular a cobalt-chrome-molybdenum or titanium-aluminum-vanadium alloy. To this extent, the femoral head cap prosthesis is known from the above-cited brochure.
In the embodiment of the invention depicted in
In the embodiment according to
The interior of pin 14 of the implants according to
In the embodiment according to
The two pin members 14a, 14b can also be connected by means of a short cylindrical spacer, e.g. of ceramic or PTFE, having a collar between the two pin members, the surface of which is flush with the pin members. The one connecting lead of the pick-up coil then runs through said spacer. Such a spacer can be fixed by means of radial dowels in pin members 14a, 14b.
The inner surface of cap component 12 of the embodiment described above can be partly covered by a layer 34 of insulating material, as is indicated by dots in
Should the pin and/or the cap component be made of electrically nonconductive material such as ceramic, conductive material coatings are provided to be the equivalent of the components serving as tissue electrodes in the embodiments described above.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2004 024 473 | May 2004 | DE | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4195367 | Kraus | Apr 1980 | A |
4214322 | Kraus | Jul 1980 | A |
5376122 | Pappas et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5383935 | Shirkhanzadeh | Jan 1995 | A |
6034295 | Rehberg et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6478824 | Hagenmeyer | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6503281 | Mallory | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6778861 | Liebrecht et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6884264 | Spiegelberg et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
7172594 | Biscup | Feb 2007 | B2 |
20030014123 | Copf et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20040230290 | Weber et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050256586 | Kraus et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
26 11 744 | Sep 1977 | DE |
3132488 | Feb 1983 | DE |
3709734 | Oct 1988 | DE |
31 32 488 | Jun 1990 | DE |
19508753 | Dec 1995 | DE |
0 781 532 | Nov 1996 | EP |
10-201778 | Aug 1998 | JP |
WO 0100097 | Jan 2001 | WO |
2004066851 | Aug 2004 | WO |
Entry |
---|
F. Lechner, et al. (1981). “Treatment of Pseudarthroses with Electrodynamic Potentials of Low Frequency Range”; Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 161, p. 71-81. |
Ascherl, R. et al. (1985); “Electrical Stimulation of Low Frequency Range in Cases of Pseudarthroses”; Reconstruction Surgery and Traumatology, vol. 19, p. 106-112. |
Kraus, W. (1992); “The Treatment of Pathological bone lesion with non-thermal, extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields”; Bioelectrochemistry and Bioenergetics, 27, (1992) p. 321-339. |
Kruger T. et al. (2000). “Einfluss der magnetisch induzier-ten Elektrostimulation (MIES) auf die Kallusfestigkeit nach Distraktion der Schafstibia”; Osteologie, 9, p. 157-164. |
The European Search Report dated Oct. 27, 2005. |
The Chinese communication dated May 9, 2008. |
The Japanese communication dated Dec. 9, 2008. |
The German communication dated Jan. 26, 2005. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050256586 A1 | Nov 2005 | US |