The present invention relates generally to systems, kits and methods for joint replacement using multiple components. In one embodiment, the present invention includes as components a ball component and a sleeve component for adapting the ball component to a prepared femoral head.
Artificial joint prostheses are widely used today, restoring joint mobility to patients affected by a variety of conditions, including degeneration of the joint and bone structure. Typically, the failed bone structure is replaced with an orthopedic implant that mimics, as closely as possible, the structure of the natural bone and performs its functions. The satisfactory performance of these implants can be affected not only by the design of the component itself, but also by the surgical positioning of the implanted component and the long-term fixation of the implant. Improper placement or positioning of the implant can adversely affect the goal of satisfactorily restoring the clinical bio-mechanics of the joint as well as impairing adequate fixation of the component when implanted.
Orthopedic implants are constructed from materials that are stable in biological environments and withstand physical stress with minimal or controlled deformation. Such materials must possess strength, resistance to corrosion, biocompatibility, and good wear properties. Also, the implants include various interacting parts, which undergo repeated long-term physical stress inside the body.
For these reasons, among others, the bone/implant interface and the connection between various parts of the implant must be durable and resistant to breakdown. This is especially important since installation of an orthopedic implant often involves an extensive and difficult medical procedure, and therefore replacement or revision of the installed implant is typically difficult and traumatic.
The requirements for the useful life of the implant continue to grow with the increase in human life expectancy.
Also, as implants improve, younger patients are considered as implant candidates. It is therefore desirable to develop implants that, while durable in their own right, minimize the difficulty of replacement or revision surgery should the implant eventually fail.
The strength and longevity of implants in large part depend on the bone/implant interface. Various methods of connection are known in the art. For example, a hip joint is a ball-in-socket joint, and includes a rounded femoral head and a cup-like socket (acetabular cup) located in the pelvis. The surfaces of the rounded femoral head and the acetabular cup continually abrade each other as a person walks. The abrasion, along with normal loading, creates stress on the hip joint and adjacent bones. If the femoral head or the acetabular cup is replaced with an implant, this stress must be well tolerated by the implant's bearing surfaces to prevent implant failure.
Depending on the type of bone, the location of the bone within the body and individual characteristics, bone has a wide variation in mechanical characteristics. Bone is generally categorized as trabecular or cancellous bone, which is porous and has an open cancellated structure, and cortical bone, which is dense. Considering the femoral bone of the hip joint,
Implantable joint prostheses have long been used to provide an artificial hip. When the prosthesis is situated in this position, significant forces such as axial, bending, and rotational forces are imparted to the device. Conventional total hip replacements use an intramedullary stem as part of the femoral prosthesis. The stem passes into the marrow cavity of the femoral shaft. These stem type prostheses are very successful but when they fail the stem can create considerable damage inside the bone. The implant can move about inside the bone causing the intramedullary cavity to be damaged. Because a stiff stem transmits the forces more directly into the femoral shaft, such implants have the further disadvantage that they can weaken the surrounding bone proximal to the hip joint due to stress shielding.
Early designs of femoral prostheses for artificial hips relied primarily on cemented fixation. These cements, such as polymethylmethacrylate, were used to anchor the component within the medullary canal by acting as a grouting agent between the component and the endosteal (inner) surface of the bone. While this method of fixation by cement provides immediate fixation and resistance to the forces encountered, and allows the surgeon to effectively position the device before the cement sets, it is not without problems. Over time, the mechanical properties and the adhesive properties of the bone cement degrade; eventually the forces overcome the cement and cause the components to become loose due to a failure at the cement/bone or cement/stem interface. Alternative approaches to address the issue of cement failure include both biological ingrowth and press-fit type stems.
Stems designed for biological ingrowth typically rely on the bone itself to grow into a specially prepared surface of the component, resulting in firmly anchoring the implant within the medullary canal. A shortfall of this approach is that, in contrast to components that utilize cement fixation, surfaces designed for biological ingrowth do not provide for immediate fixation because it takes time for the bone to grow into the specially prepared surface. Press-fit stems precisely engineered to fit within a surgically prepared medullary canal may or may not have specially prepared surfaces and typically rely on an interference fit of some portion of the component within the medullary canal of the bone to achieve stable fixation.
The need often arises to replace at least a portion of a hip implant. Prior art designs often require the entire implant to be replaced even if only a portion of the implant fails. Similarly, the entire implant may have to be replaced if the implant is intact but certain conditions surrounding the implant have changed. This is often due to the implant suffering from a decrease in support from the adjacent bone from stress shielding or other negative effects of the implant on surrounding bone.
Surgeons have sought a more conservative device than an implant using an intramedullary stem as part of the femoral prosthesis. There have been a number of attempts at implants using short stems or femoral caps without stems and requiring less extensive surgery. This type of prosthesis is generally known as a hip resurfacing prosthesis as opposed to a total hip prosthesis. In the mid-1940's Judet in France designed a prosthesis whereby the majority of the femoral head was removed and a replacement device was fitted with a peg or nail which passed a short way down the femoral neck. Small movement of the device against the bone caused friction of the bone and the bending loads on the peg often caused them to break out underneath the bony femoral neck. In the mid-1970's, double cup type arthroplasty was tried. There were several designs: Wagner in Germany, an Italian Group, Imperial College London and the Tharies design from Amstutz in Calif. These all removed a fair proportion of the femoral bearing surface by turning it down to a cylindrical form or hemispherical form. A metal shell was then fixed with bone cement on the remaining bony peg. The acetabular cup was conventional. Unlike normal total hips, however, which have standard femoral head sizes in the range of 22-32 mm, these double cup arthroplasties needed to have large bearing surface diameters closer to the original hip, typically in a range from 40-60 mm. These latter double cup designs commonly failed either by a crack progressing around the bone cement between the prosthetic femoral shell and the bone or by a fracture of the bone across from one side of the prosthetic femoral component rim to the other.
Current approaches to femoral head resurfacing can be traced back to Amstutz in U.S. Pat. No. 4,123,806. In the '806 patent, a hemispherical cap is cemented to a prepared femoral head while preserving a substantial portion of the femoral head. In U.S. Pat. No. 6,156,069, Amstutz shows a femoral head resurfacing implant having a stem. A similar femoral head resurfacing technique called Birmingham Hip Resurfacing has been developed by McMinn in the United Kingdom. A modular approach to a femoral hip resurfacing is shown in U.S. Pat. No. 4,846,841 to Oh. In this approach, a frustro-conical cap is press-fit to a prepared femoral head. A ball component is then attached to and retained by the cap using a Morse taper fit. A similar approach is shown in U.S. Pat. No. 5,258,033 to Lawes and Ling, which shows a ball component cemented either directly to a prepared head or additionally retained by a press-fit with a frustro-conical cap.
All of these more modern hip resurfacing approaches require that the femoral head be prepared to provide a properly oriented and shaped bone interface for the implant by shaping the head. The outer prepared bone interface with the implant is usually symmetrical around an axis passing through the central region of the femoral neck and is typically cylindrical or conical but may be a more complex solid of revolution. The proximal portion of the prepared head can be a flat surface, tapered, domed, chamfered, or any combination of these features and is usually performed as a separate resection following preparation of the outer interface surface. If a stem is used, it may be cylindrical, tapered or a more complex solid of revolution and is typically short compared to a conventional intramedullary stem. The portion of the bone that hosts the prosthesis must be shaped so that it matches the shape of the prosthesis. The size and shape of the bone may fit exactly the shape and size of the prosthesis or may provide room for cementing to take place or have an excess of bone in a region to allow press-fit fixation, depending on the preferred fixation method.
Because the desired bone shape of the outer implant interface is symmetrical around an axis, a guide wire introduced into the femoral head is typically used to establish the tooling landmark for the various measuring and cutting tools used in the preparation process by providing an axis of revolution. Based on pre-operative planning, the surgeon initially places the guide wire, either freehand or using measurement and guidance tools based on various anatomical reference points on the femur. In order to place the pin, the pin is impacted or inserted in the proximal surface of the femoral head directed toward the greater trochanter and approximately down the mid-lateral axis of the femoral neck. A gauge having an extended stylus that allows measurement of the position of the pin with respect to the neck is then typically used to make a preliminary check of the pin position. By revolving the gauge, the surgeon can evaluate the position of the pin to ensure that the femoral neck will not be undercut when the cutting tool is revolved around the pin. The surgeon also uses the gauge to evaluate the support the prepared femoral head will provide to the implant. If the surgeon is satisfied that the pin position meets these criteria, the guide wire is used to establish the axis of revolution for the shaping cutter or reamer to prepare the head to receive the implant. If a stem cavity is required, a cannulated drill or reamer is centered on the guide pin to create the cavity after creating the outer surface of the prepared head.
It is an object of the present invention to provide a more successful surface replacement of the femoral portion of a total hip replacement by improvements to a stemless, modular approach to femoral hip resurfacing.
According to an aspect of the present invention, a total hip replacement femoral component has an outer ball component sized to conform to an acetabular socket. The ball component is hemispherical and has an internal bore adapted to receive the outer surface of a sleeve. The bore and sleeve outer surface have mating surfaces typically in the shape of a truncated cone to create a taper lock type fit, but may also incorporate anti-rotational or indexing features such as a tapered spline, tapered square or a keyway and key. The inner surface of the sleeve is shaped and dimensioned to mate with a prepared femoral head. The sleeve and prepared head may also incorporate anti-rotational or indexing features. The sleeve receives the head and is retained by various known methods including bone ingrowth, an interference fit or by using bone cement.
It is another aspect of the invention to provide ball and sleeve components with altered geometries to allow variation in the orientation of the ball component with respect to the axis defined by the femoral head and neck and to provide a system of location features to facilitate adjusting the ball component orientation during surgery.
In the preferred embodiment the internal bore of the sleeve component is inwardly tapered. Thus, the taper can be co-axial with the femoral neck although there may be advantages in orienting the axis of the taper slightly more vertical when in position so that it is closer to the average force vector acting on the femoral head during human activity. With this tapered sleeve the interface between the sleeve and the prepared bone is placed in compression to aid in retention and facilitate bone ingrowth. The sleeve bore may be arranged with anti rotation features such as ridges which extend along the length of the sleeve to engage the prepared bone surface and prevent rotation of the sleeve relative to the bone.
It is also an aspect of the invention to provide a kit of ball and sleeve components with not only the usual variety of sizes of ball components etc. to fit the implant to the patient but also with altered geometries to facilitate variation in the offset orientation of the ball component and sleeve relative to the neck axis by the surgeon during surgery. Such a kit may also contain trial components, such as trial ball components that facilitate selection of the ball component to actually be fitted to the patient. It is also an aspect of the invention that the various geometries of the ball components are marked on a non-spherical surface of the ball. Such a marking is visible to the surgeon in selecting and orienting the ball component but does not damage the spherical bearing surface. The various markings and symbols in the ball components may not only identify the particular component, but may also be used to orient the component by indicating features such as offsets or the angular orientation of an axis. This aspect of the invention is particularly important when the orientation of a component feature will not be apparent or measurable when the component is installed.
Another object of the invention is to provide a method for installing the femoral prosthesis described above by appropriately preparing and shaping the femoral head, guiding and fitting the sleeve to a proper orientation on the prepared femoral head, and guiding and fitting the partial ball component onto the sleeve to complete the installation of the prosthesis.
As shown in
While shown here as a truncated cone with two tapering surfaces 14 and 15, either of surfaces 14 and 15 can define a hollow cylinder or other surfaces such as an ogive or any parabolic surface capable of being fit over a matched prepared femoral head surface 9′. The proximal portion 12 can be a different shape of revolution about the central axis or, as shown in
The sleeve 10 may be a solid structure, or it may have a porous inner surface at 14 that is integrated with or attached to a solid outer layer or the sleeve may be porous throughout. When a taper lock type of retention of the ball component 20 of the sleeve 10 is used as depicted in
Different methods may be used to transition the porosity characteristics from a porous sleeve inner surface 14 to an outer surface 15 that is solid or substantially solid. For example, a first region adjacent the sleeve outer surface may be relatively dense, having a porosity in the range from 0% to 50% and the second porosity region adjacent to the porous inner surface 14 may have a relatively greater porosity in the range from 20% to 90%. In the instance of overlapping porosity ranges, the porosity will generally be less in the outer porosity region than in the inner porosity region. It is also possible to establish a gradient of porosity throughout the sleeve progressing from a substantially solid outer surface to a porous inner surface. The gradient of porosity through the sleeve layer may be linear, defined in zones as above or by other means. Variations in the porosity characteristics may be used to alter the modulus of elasticity of the sleeve materials and control the rigidity and transitional material properties between porosity zones, differing materials and differing structural load regions. Methods of achieving distributions of porosity are also discussed in co-owned application Ser. No. 10/317,229 entitled “Gradient Porous Implant”.
Turning to
The ball component 20 is depicted in cross-section in
Unlike the hemispherical outer surface 22, the distal surface 24 does not function as a bearing, and does not require the fine finish, hardness and careful handling typically required by an implant bearing surface. Distal surface 24 is depicted in the various figures as co-planar with the distal plane 25. It is to be understood that this is for convenience and clarity of depiction. The distal surface 24 may in fact vary from the distal plane 25. For example, the variation could be defined as the height variation of surface 24 with respect to the distal plane 25 as an angle theta is rotated about the polar axis E. In the instance where the distal surface 24 is not co-planar with the distal plane 25, the distal surface can define a distal plane by setting the distal surface 24 on a known planar surface and defining the plane 25 by the three contact points of the known surface with the distal surface 24 or by other methods as are known in the art.
A polar axis E of the ball component 20 as shown in
One difficulty encountered by a surgeon in using spherical components with linear or angular offsets is that the offsets may be difficult to perceive, even in the uninstalled component, and become virtually impossible to discern once the component is installed. For this reason, markings and symbols 29 are provided on the distal surface 24. Comparing
It is also possible to vary the positions of the sleeve 10 and ball component 20 along any of the axes C, D, E and F by varying the relationship of the interface dimensions interface to create a translational offset. For example, in the instance of a conical interface, a relative decrease of Rc with respect to a mating surface of the prepared femoral head 7′ will shift the sleeve 10 and the ball component 20 in in the proximal direction along axis C. Similarly, the ball component 20 can be shifted along axes D, E and F by adjusting the various dimensions of the sleeve or sleeve/ball component interface.
It will be understood by a person skilled in the arts that angular, linear and translational offsets can be combined in either or both of the ball component and the sleeve to achieve desired geometrical relationships between the prepared femoral head 7′ and the objective position in space of the spherical surface 22. In such instances, more complex markings 29 as indicated by the addition of a square symbol in
While the bone ingrowth porous surface described as a preferred embodiment of the sleeve 10 and the taper lock fitting between the sleeve 10 and the ball component 20 are sufficient to prevent rotation of either the sleeve and ball components of the implant, it may be desirable to use ribs or eccentric features such as a key and keyways to insure that rotation does not take place and to provide an indexed orientation between the various components. For example, the interface between the sleeve 10 and the ball component 20 could take the form of a tapered spline rather than a taper lock depending solely on friction. Likewise, the interior surface of the sleeve 14 can have ribs oriented in line with the cavity axis C to provide a mechanical anti-rotation feature and a rotational orientation feature. If desired, the preparation of the femoral head can also include mating features to the sleeve anti-rotation features
In addition to the angular offsets that can be achieved with the sleeve or the ball component, it is also possible to increase the angular offset by preparing the femoral head 7′ on an axis varying from the femoral neck axis B-B. Such an offset preparation axis B′-B′ is depicted in
The modular components of an implant according to the embodiments of the invention described above are particularly well suited for inclusion in a kit that can be used by a surgeon to evaluate and construct an implant specifically tailored to the patient's autonomy and dimensions. Such a kit of ball and sleeve components can include not only the usual variety of sizes of ball components etc. to fit the implant to the patient but also include components with altered geometries to facilitate variation in the offset orientation of the ball component and sleeve relative to the neck axis, as described above, by the surgeon during surgery. Importantly, the sleeve, once installed on the prepared femoral head, provides a reliable mechanical datum to provide adjustment and optimization of the position of the bearing surface as facilitated by the kit components.
The kit may also contain trial components, such as trial ball components that facilitate selection of the ball component to actually be fitted to the patient by duplicating various aspects of the ball components geometry. The trial components may include features that ease trial fitting but are not possible on an actual component. These features can include transparent components to allow visualization of otherwise obscured regions, external markings and orienting guides on the trial ball surface and tooling points on the trial ball surface. Features can also be incorporated to ease trial fitting, such as taper lock type features that provide accurate positioning, but do not readily lock so as to allow trial rotation of an offset component and ease of removal of the trial component.
As discussed above it is also an aspect of the invention that the various geometries of the ball components are marked on a non-spherical surface of the ball. It will be apparent that given the variety of ball components in a kit and the need for orientating offset components during fitting, the markings and symbols on the distal surface of the ball components may not only serve to identify the particular components, but may also be used to orient the component by indicating the direction and magnitude of features such as offsets or the angular orientation of an axis.
Another object of the invention is to provide a method for installing the femoral prosthesis described above by appropriately preparing and shaping the femoral head, guiding and impacting the sleeve to a proper orientation on the prepared femoral head, and guiding and orienting the ball component onto the sleeve to complete the installation of the prosthesis. The various aspects of the kit described above may also be used during the surgical procedure. It will also be appreciated that even after fitting the actual ball component to the sleeve, the ball component can be removed and a ball component with a different offset or diameter can be used to improve the position of the bearing surface.
As an example of the method of installing a femoral prosthesis to a femoral ball or head, the outer surface of femoral head is first reamed and otherwise shaped to a predetermined configuration to match the shape of the sleeve and create a prepared femoral head having the desired head axis orientation; then a sleeve according to the embodiments of the invention discussed above is fitted on the prepared femoral head. If the sleeve is of the offset type, it is fitted in a desired orientation to properly position the offset. A ball component according to the embodiments of the invention discussed above is then fitted to the sleeve and locked in position. If the ball component is of the linear or angular offset type, it is fitted in a desired orientation to properly position the offset.
It will also be appreciated that in a revision surgery, the original ball component can be removed and a new ball component can be fitted to the original sleeve to replace a ball component or to revise the position of the bearing surface.
Unless stated to the contrary, any use of the words such as “including,” “containing,” “comprising,” “having” and the like, means “including without limitation” and shall not be construed to limit any general statement that it follows to the specific or similar items or matters immediately following it.
Although the invention herein has been described with reference to particular embodiments, it is to be understood that these embodiments are merely illustrative of the principles and applications of the present invention. It is therefore to be understood that numerous modifications may be made to the illustrative embodiments and that other arrangements may be devised without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention as defined by the appended claims.
This application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/478,870, filed on Jun. 30, 2006, the entire disclosure of which is herein incorporated by reference.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11478870 | Jun 2006 | US |
Child | 12620994 | US |