Femoral prosthesis

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • D752222
  • Patent Number
    D752,222
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, May 14, 2013
    11 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, March 22, 2016
    8 years ago
  • US Classifications
    Field of Search
    • US
    • D24 155-156
    • D24 176
    • D24 171
    • D15 21
    • D15 28
    • 433 172-174
    • 623 017160
    • 623 017170
    • 623 011110
    • 623 023260
    • 623 023270
    • 606 266000
    • 606 328000
    • 606 054000
    • 606 264000
    • 606 273000
    • 606 250000
  • International Classifications
    • 2402
    • Term of Grant
      14Years
Abstract
Description


FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a femoral prosthesis showing our new design;



FIG. 2 is a front elevation view of the femoral prosthesis shown in FIG. 1;



FIG. 3 is a rear elevation view of the femoral prosthesis shown in FIG. 1;



FIG. 4 is a left-side elevation view of the femoral prosthesis shown in FIG. 1;



FIG. 5 is a right-side elevation view of the femoral prosthesis shown in FIG. 1;



FIG. 6 is a top plan view of the femoral prosthesis shown in FIG. 1;



FIG. 7 is a bottom plan view of the femoral prosthesis shown in FIG. 1;



FIG. 8 is a front perspective view of the femoral prosthesis shown in FIG. 1 mounted on a femur; and,



FIG. 9 is a rear perspective of the femoral prosthesis shown in FIG. 1 mounted on a femur.


The portions shown in broken lines do not form part of the claimed design.


Claims
  • The ornamental design for a femoral prosthesis, as shown and described.
US Referenced Citations (48)
Number Name Date Kind
D242827 Elliott Dec 1976 S
4659331 Matthews et al. Apr 1987 A
D291003 Huckstep Jul 1987 S
D374078 Johnson et al. Sep 1996 S
5878170 Kim Mar 1999 A
6249594 Hibbard Jun 2001 B1
6345112 Summers et al. Feb 2002 B1
D473307 Cooke Apr 2003 S
6912310 Park et al. Jun 2005 B1
D528209 Furlong et al. Sep 2006 S
7184814 Lang et al. Feb 2007 B2
7376254 Barth May 2008 B2
7773786 Fidrich et al. Aug 2010 B2
7799077 Lang et al. Sep 2010 B2
D625415 Otto et al. Oct 2010 S
D638541 Claypool May 2011 S
7995810 Li et al. Aug 2011 B2
8036729 Lang et al. Oct 2011 B2
D649639 Bertoni et al. Nov 2011 S
D651317 May et al. Dec 2011 S
8073252 Florin et al. Dec 2011 B2
8077950 Tsougarakis et al. Dec 2011 B2
8090172 Shinagawa et al. Jan 2012 B2
8098909 Hibbard et al. Jan 2012 B2
8112142 Alexander et al. Feb 2012 B2
8160345 Pavlovskaia et al. Apr 2012 B2
D661808 Kang Jun 2012 S
8715359 Deffenbaugh et al. May 2014 B2
20080030497 Hu et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080139922 Pelletier et al. Jun 2008 A1
20090076371 Lang et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090136103 Sonka et al. May 2009 A1
20090190815 Dam et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090226060 Gering et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090306496 Koo et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090319047 Walker Dec 2009 A1
20090324078 Wu et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100232671 Dam et al. Sep 2010 A1
20110066245 Lang et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110144760 Wong et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110295378 Bojarski et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110304332 Mahfouz Dec 2011 A1
20120004725 Shterling et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120197408 Lang et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120209394 Bojarski et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120316563 Metzger et al. Dec 2012 A1
20120323334 Jones et al. Dec 2012 A1
20120323337 Parisi et al. Dec 2012 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (4)
Number Date Country
2009052562 Apr 2009 WO
2011150238 Dec 2011 WO
2012017375 Feb 2012 WO
2012051178 Apr 2012 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (14)
Entry
Kapur et al., Model Based Segmentation of Clinical Knee MRI, 1998, 9 pages, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Lynch et al., Cartilage Segmentation of 3D MRI Scans of the Osteoarthritic Knee Combining User Knowledge and Active Countours, Jun. 2000, 11 pages, Osteoporosis & Arthritis Research Group, Department of Radiology, UCSF, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Yezzi et al., A Variational Framework for Joint Segmentation and Registration, 2001, 8 pages, School of Electrical and and Computer Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Cambridge, MA, Visualization Technology Inc.; Lawrence, MA, USA.
Pakin et al., Segmentation, Surface Extraction and Thickness Computation of Articular Cartilage, 2002, 13 pages, University of Rochester, Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rochester NY, University of Rochester, Department of Radiology, Rochester NY, USA.
Ray et al., Merging Parametric Active Countours Within Homogeneous Image Regions for MRI-Based Lung Segmentation, Feb. 2003, 11 pages, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 22, No. 2.
Tamez-Pena et al., Knee Cartilage Extraction and Bone-Cartilage Interface Analysis From 3D MRI Data Sets, 2004, 11 pages, Osteoporosis & Arthritis Research Group, Department of Radiology, UCSF, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Yushkevich et al., User-Guided 3D Active Contour Segmentation of Anatomical Structures: Significantly Improved Efficiency and Reliability, 2006, 13 pages, Penn Image Computing and Science Laboratory, Dept. of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, PA, Depts. of Computer Science and Psychiatry, University of North Carolina, NC,Neurodevelopmental Disorders Research Center, University of North Carolina, NC, USA.
Folkesson et al. Segmenting Articular Cartilage Automatically Using a Voxel Classification Approach, Jan. 2007, 10 pages, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 26, No. 1.
El Naqa et al, Concurrent Multimodality Image Segmentation by Active Contours for Radiotherapy Treatment Planning, Dec. 2007, 12 pages, Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Sun et al., Active Contour Based Subthalamic Nucleus Segmentation on MRI Mippr 2009: Medical Imaging, Parallel Processing of Images, and Opimization Techniques, 2009, 12 pages, Dept. of Biomedical Engineering, Nanchang Hangkong University, Nanchang, China.
Williams et al., Anatomically Corresponded Regional Analysis of Cartilage in Asymptomatic and Osteoarthritic Knees by Statistical Shape Modelling of the Bone, Aug. 2010, 19 pages, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 29, No. 8.
Yin et al., Logismos-Layered Optimal Graph Image Segmentation of Multiple Objects and Surfaces: Cartilage Segmentation in the Knee Joint, Dec. 2010, 15 pages, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 29, No. 12.
Yin et al., Electric Field Theory Based Approach to Search-Direction Line Definition in Image Segmentation: Application to Optimal Femur-Tibia Cartilage Segmentation in Knee-Joint 3-D MR, 2010, 9 pages, Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Tamez-Pena et al., Unsupervised Segmentation and Quantification of Anatomical Knee Features: Data From The Osteoarthritis Initiative, 19 pages, Apr. 2012, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 29, No. 8.