1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to wireless communication. More specifically, the present invention relates to methods for efficiently assigning channels to femtocells, taking into account hand-off, interference, coverage area, and power control considerations.
2. Discussion of the Related Art
Because mobile telephones may be used practically everywhere, they are replacing fixed wired telephones. The article, “UMA and Femtocells: Making FMC Happen” (“Choudhury”), by Partho Choudhury and Deepak Dahuja, “White Paper, December 2007. (available: at http://www.parthochoudhury.com/UMAFemto.doc), discloses (a) that approximately 30-35% of all voice calls made over a mobile network are made by mobile subscribers at their homes, and (b) about 35% of video streaming and broadcasting service uses over cellular wireless networks in 2006 took place while the mobile subscribers are at their homes.
The trend, therefore, is for the mobile telephone to become the primary or only telephone for an individual subscriber. Furthermore, the article, “Femto Cells: Personal Base Stations” (“Airvana”), published by Airvana Inc., White Paper, 2007 (available http://www.airvana.com/files/Femto_Overview_Whitepaper_FINAL—12-July-07.pdf), reveals that those 24 years of age or younger make up to 80% of their long distance calls on wireless networks rather than over wired networks. However, there is still much to be improved in reliability, voice quality, and cost of today's mobile telephone networks in indoor environments. Typically, the mobile telephone service is more costly than a wired telephone service, and there are dead spots and poor coverage. These deficiencies result in poor customer experience, thus preventing the mobile telephone to successfully replace the wired telephone as the primary or only telephone for most subscribers.
Choudhury, Airvana, and the article “The Case for Home Base Stations” (“PicoChip”), published by PicoChip Designs Ltd., White Paper, April 2007 (available http://www.picochip.com/downloads/27c85c984cd0d348edcffe7413f6ff79/femtocell_wp.pdf) all disclose a new class of base stations (BSs) designed for indoor and personal uses, The cells served by these personal BSs have come to be known as “femtocells.” A femtocell (e.g., the home e-node B (HeNB) defined in the 3GPP standard) enables indoor wireless connectivity through existing broadband Internet connections. As described in Choudhury, femtocells are also featured in fixed-mobile convergence (FMC), where the subscribers are provided the ability to switch an active data/voice call session between home wireless network (e.g., femtocell) and a mobile network (e.g., a cellular network). As reported by Choudhury, Airvana and PicoChip, the benefits of femtocells include improved indoor coverage, reduced capital and operational expenditure, reduced bandwidth load, reduced power requirements, additional high-end revenue streams, improved customer royalty, increased average revenue per user, compatibility with existing handsets (without requiring dual-mode terminals), deployment in an operator-owned spectrum, and enhanced emergency services (since the femtocells are location-aware).
Despite these benefits, femtocell technology is still at its infancy. As identified in Airvana, the technical issues to be solved include those related to interference management (both between different femtocells and between the femtocell and the macrocell), efficient hand-off mechanisms, security, scalability, and access control. For example, co-channel implementations of femtocells—where the macrocell network and the femtocell network share the same frequency band—introduce serious challenges. Co-channel deployment of femtocells has desirable hand-off characteristics, as a mobile station (MS) may more efficiently scan the cells using the same frequency band compared to identifying the cells using other frequency bands, which require band-switching to accomplish the scanning. However, for distances that are close to the macrocell base station (mBS), severe interference from the mBS may prevent co-channel deployment.
The article, “Effects of User-Deployed, Co-Channel Femtocells on the Call Drop Probability in a Residential Scenario” (“Lester”), by Lester T. W. Ho and Holger Claussen, published in Proc. of IEEE Int. Symp. on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC), pp. 1-5, September 2007, shows that the received signals from the femtocell and the macrocell in such an implementation have identical power levels at the border of the macrocell. Thus, without adequate power control, the femtocell coverage area decreases for those femtocells that are closer to the macrocell BS (mBS). However, when the femtocell coverage area falls below a certain size, the femtocell does not completely cover a user's premise, which is the preferred coverage area. A different solution is desired, under such circumstances.
The article, “Uplink Capacity and Interference Avoidance for Two-Tier Cellular Networks” (“Chandrasekhar”), by Vikram Chandrasekhar and Jeffrey G. Andrews, published in Proc. IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference (GLOBECOM), pp. 3322-3326, November 2007, derived and analyzed the uplink (UL) capacity of a co-channel femtocell network coexisting with a macrocell network (i.e., a shared-spectrum network). In a split spectrum network, the femtocell users and the macrocell users use orthogonal sub-channels. While the split spectrum network avoids interference between the macrocell and the different femtocells, the total number of users that can be supported is less than a shared spectrum network. In a shared spectrum network, a femtocell may use a sub-channel that is already used in the macrocell, so long as there is little interference between the femtocell and the portion of the macrocell network where the common sub-channel is used. In a co-channel femtocell deployment, an MS need not scan through multiple frequency bands to search for the cell.
Chadrasekhar suggests using interference avoidance methods to reduce the outage probability. For example, each macrocell user and each femtocell may employ time-hopping in order to decrease interference. Further, the macrocell and femtocell may both use a sectored antenna reception for improving the capacity. Chandrasekhar's analytical/simulation results show that, by using interference avoidance (specifically, time-hopped code-division multiple access (TH-CDMA) and sectorized antennas), up to seven times higher femtocell BS (fBS) density can be supported in a shared spectrum network, relative to to a split spectrum network with omnidirectional femtocell antennas. However, sectored antennas may be difficult to implement at the femtocells (which are necessarily, for practical considerations, simpler devices than regular BSs). Further, a time-hoping approach increases symbol duration (and hence, decreases data rate).
Lester, discussed above, analyzed hand-off probabilities for different power configurations at a femtocell. Since the manual cell-planning used in macrocell networks is not economically practical for femtocells, femtocells typically require auto-configuration capabilities (e.g., automatic power and cell size configuration). Lester's simulations show that call drop probabilities can be significantly decreased in a residential co-channel femtocell deployment through simple pilot power adaptation mechanisms.
The article, “Performance of Macro- and Co-Channel Femtocells in a Hierarchical Cell Structure” (“Claussen”), by Holger Claussen, published in Proc. of IEEE Int. Symp. on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC), pp. 1-5, September 2007, discloses a simple power control algorithm for pilots and data signals in femtocells. Simulation results show that the interference to the macrocell network can be minimized through intelligent power control techniques.
In Lester, Chandrasekhar and Clausen, relatively simple power control mechanisms are proposed for femtocells, so that the signal-to-interference ratio (SINR) is equal to 0 dB at the cell edge. However, depending on the distance between the mBS and the fBS, such power control strategies may not be effective. For example, as mentioned above, the maximum transmission power of a co-channel femtocell may not be sufficient to provide satsifactory coverage when the fBS is close to the mBS.
The article, “Home NodeB Output Power,” published by Ericsson, 3GPP TSG Working Group 4 meeting (available at http://www.3gpp.org/ftp/tsg_ran/WG4_Radio/TSGR4—43bis/Docs/), provides a power control scheme which reduces the femtocell transmit power as the distance between the macrocell BS and the femtocell BS increases. Under such an arrangement, the macrocell MSs experience better coverage as a result of reduced interference from the femtocell. However, this approach is questionable when a femtocell is either very close to or very far away from the macrocell BS.
The article, “Uplink User Capacity in a Multicell CDMA System with Hotspot Microcells,” by S. Kishore, L. J. Greenstein, H. V. Poor, and S. C. Schwartz, published in IEEE Trans. On Wireless Communications, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 1333-1342, June 2006, overcomes the near-far effect by increasing femtocell coverage. Increased femtocell coverage is achieved by allowing an MS close to a femtocell to communicate with the macrocell BS only when the signal quality from the macrocell BS is significantly better. This approach increases interference at neighboring femtocells.
The following patent application publications disclose femtocell implementations: (a) U.S. Patent Application Publication 2007/0183427, “Access Control in Radio Access Network Having Pico Base Stations,” by T. Nylander et al., filed Oct. 3, 2006; (b) U.S. Patent Application Publication 2007/0254620, entitled “Dynamic Building of Monitored Set”, by T. L. E. Lindqvist et al., filed Apr. 28, 2006; and (c) Internation Patent Application Publication WO2006/0139460, entitled “Method and Apparatus for Remote Monitoring of Femto Radio Base Stations”, by J. Vikeberg et al., May 30, 2006. However, none of these patent applications offers an efficient frequency assignment scheme for a femtocell deployment.
Femtocells may increase the efficiency and coverage of macro cellular networks. Successful femtocell deployment depends on efficiently managing both interference among different femtocells and interference between a femtocell and a macrocell.
According to one embodiment of the present invention, an efficient frequency assignment scheme for femtocells is provided. The frequency assignment scheme reduces the interference between a femtocell and a macrocell and among different femtocells. Under this method, based on its location and where required, the femtocells perform spectrum-sensing and select suitable channels from a set of candidate channels. The method also provides an acceptable femtocell coverage area, even when the fBS is close to the mBS (i.e., as determined using a threshold). The frequency assignment scheme prefers sharing the frequency band of the macrocell network with the femtocells to take advantage of the desirable hand-off characteristics (i.e., the MS need not scan different frequency bands to search for cells). However, when the interference from the mBS exceeds a threshold, the assignment scheme requires the femtocell to use a different frequency band selected from a set of appropriate frequencies to ensure an acceptable femtocell coverage area. The frequency assignment scheme is applicable to various types of femtocells, such as the Home eNodeB and other personal BSs.
According to another embodiment of the present invention, the frequency assignment scheme may also provide joint power control and frequency allocation. Under this embodiment, the frequency assignment scheme is priority-based, such that the candidate frequency bands are selected depending on various parameters, such as the relative locations of the fBS and the mBS, path loss exponents and a frequency reuse factor (N). When the fBS is far away from the mBS, the fBS selects a frequency band from among those used by the mBS, and when the fBS is close to the mBS, a different frequency band is assigned to the fBS to achieve an acceptable coverage area. When the femtocell is located within a power control region, the transmission power of the femtocell is controlled to maintain a fixed coverage area for the femtocell. Among the femtocells, spectrum-sensing is used to select candidate frequency bands for use, in order to reduce interference among different femtocells.
The present invention is better understood upon consideration of the detailed description below in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
As discussed above, a co-channel implementation is preferable for a femtocell, from hand-off and cell search points of view. However, co-channel operation may not always be possible, due to interference from the mBS.
For this detailed description, the coverage area of a fBS is defined for convenience sake by a contour along which the levels of the received power from the fBS and from the mBS are the same. The present invention is, however, is not limited by this convention. The present invention is applicable to situations where the coverage area may be defined in other ways. For example, the coverage area may be defined by a hand-off parameter, such as the cell search initiation threshold or the hand-off execution threshold. In such a case, the received power levels from the fBS and from the mBS may not be the same. Also, in such other cases, there may be more than one contour that defines the coverage area (e.g., a contour for an incoming user to the fBS, and another contour for an outgoing user from the fBS).
Referring to
At step 40, when coverage area AfBS is less than the threshold value, the fBS should choose one of the N−1 frequency bands that is different than Fi. To minimize interference with other femtocells, the femtocell preferably first scans the N−1 frequency bands.
In addition to the coverage area AfBS of a fBS, an approximate region of coverage RfBS may also be determined algebraically, as described in further detail below. Frequently, region RfBS may be approximated by a circle, with the center of this circle being collinear with the locations of the fBS and the mBS, and further away from the mBS relative to the fBS. The distance between the center of the circle of region RfBS and the fBS location depends on such parameters as the path loss exponent and the transmission powers of the fBS and the mBS. Referring back to
According to yet another frequency band assignment framework, during an initialization step of the femtocell, an MS or the femtocell fBS may measure the received signal strength and report the received signal strength to the mBS. The mBS may then determine if the fBS belongs to inner region 6 or outer region 7, and report the determination to the fBS. Frequency band assignment may then proceed along any of the schemes discussed above based on the geographical region determination.
For an mBS located at x1=(x1; y1), with transmit power P1, and an fBS located at x2=(x2; y2), with transmit power P2, under an empirical path loss model, the power of a signal transmitted from an mBS and received at an MS is given by
Pr,1=P1Po(do/d)n, (1)
where Po is is the measured path loss at a reference distance do (typically, P0 may be approximated by (4π/λ)2 for do=1, with λ denoting the wavelength of the signal) and n is the path loss exponent. Because the signal-to-interference ratio (SIR) is assumed to be 0 dB at the border of a co-channel femtocell, without loss of generality, Po is the same for both the fBS and the mBS at a distance do=1, so that:
Thus, in a system in which n=2, the coordinates x=(x; y) of the points on the border of the femtocell satisfy:
dj2=(x−xj)2+(y−yj)2, jε{1, 2}. (3)
Combining equations (3) and (2), one obtains:
Equation (4) is in the form of a circle of radius r which is centered at k=(k1; k2), i.e.,
x2+y2−2k1x−2k2y+k12+k2 2−r2=0. (9)
Therefore, comparing equations (9) and (4), the center point k=(k1; k2), representing the center of femtocell coverage area, is
which may also be expressed in vector form as:
The radius r is given by:
Then, the femtocell coverage area is:
Equation (12) shows that the femtocell coverage area depends on both the locations of the mBS and the fBS, and their respective transmit powers.
For n≠2 (i.e., for any arbitrary path loss exponent), taking the (2/n)-th root of both sides of equation (2) provides:
which is equivalent to the scenario with n=2 above, but characterized by a different set of transmit powers. The center of coverage and the area of coverage may be derived using the same procedure illustrated above with respect to equations (10) and (12), substituting (P1)2/n for P1 and (P2)2/n for P2.
In general, the path loss exponents at the fBS and mBS are different (i.e., Po is not the same for both the fBS and the mBS at a distance do=1). In that case, rather than equation (2):
Because the mBS is typically located at a higher altitude (e.g., on a cell tower), the power loss exponents may satisfy n1<n2. Taking the (2/n2)-th root of both sides of equation (14), one obtains:
The assumption that the signal-to-interference ratio (SIR) is 0 dB at the border of a co-channel femtocell results in:
P22/n
where 0<n1/n2<1. In equation (16), the highest power of both the x and y terms is 2. Equation (16) may be simplified by approximating d2n1/n2=1, and evaluating equation (16) at a point (a; b), using a second-order Taylor series (Point (a;b) may be approximated by (x1;x2) in most cases):
Then, using the result of equation (17) in equation (16), one obtains:
Ã1x2+Ã2y2+{tilde over (B)}1x+{tilde over (B)}2y+{tilde over (B)}3xy+C=0, (24)
where
Equation (24) resembles the circle of equation (4), except for: 1) the xy cross-terms, so that the coverage area is an ellipse, rather than a circle, and 2) the coefficients for x2 and y2 are different. If P2<<P1, one may set Ã1≈Ã2, and {tilde over (B)}3≈0 (i.e., once again approximating the coverage area by a circle). With this simplification, the coordinates at the center of the coverage area, and the area of the coverage area, can be obtained using the procedures discussed above with respect to equations (10) and (12), using equations (25)-(30).
Because spectrum resources are scarce, small frequency reuse factors are preferable. Thus, a frequency reuse factor of N=1 may be preferable in many future wireless systems. In such a system, femtocells may have to use the same frequency band as the macrocell in all locations within the macrocell coverage area. However, as discussed above, when an fBS is very close to the mBS, the femtocell experiences severe interference from the mBS. Interference averaging techniques, such as those discussed in Chandrasekhar (above) may be used to mitigate the interference. Such techniques have inherent disadvantages, and may also not be sufficient to overcome the interference in femtocells at close proximities to the mBS.
The scenarios discussed above are applicable to downlink channel assignments. The interference for the uplink may be different, and a different channel assignment scheme may be needed for duplex operation. For example, a macrocell MS (mMS) may need a larger transmit power to reach the mBS, when the MS is far away from the mBS. Hence, when the femtocell is located within outer region 7, as far as the uplink operation is concerned, the interference from an mMS to the femtocell may be more significant, when the femtocell and the mMS both use the same channels for communication. Thus, to avoid interference between the mMS and the femtocell, different channels are preferably assigned to the mMS and femtocell in outer region 7. Within inner region 6, because the mMS uses weaker signals to communicate with the mBS, co-channel operation with the femtocell may be possible.
According to another aspect of the present invention, power control and frequency assignment may be carried out simultaneously (“joint power control and frequency assignment”). The macrocell network of
To provide joint power control and frequency assignment, a method according to the present invention follows the following criteria: (a) co-channel operation of the femtocell is preferable from cell-search and hand-off points of view, subject to the interference conditions from the mBS; (b) in all cases, the femtocell guarantees a minimum coverage area Afem through power control; and (c) the femtocell has a maximum transmission power limit Pmax and a minimum transmission power limit Pmin. Power limit Pmax may represent hardware constraints or interference constraints among femtocells, while power limit Pmin may be the minimum transmission power needed for good coverage, in the absence of any interference.
As discussed above, the coverage area of the fBS is determined by the area within a contour along which the received power levels (typically, for the pilot signals, rather than the data signals) from the fBS and mBS are the same. The present invention, however, is equally applicable to systems in which the coverage areas are defined in other ways, such as hand-off parameters. Such hand-off parameters may include, for example, cell search initiation threshold and handoff execuation threshold. In such cases, the received power levels from the fBS and mBS may not be the same, and there may be more than one contour that defines the coverage area (e.g., one contour for an incoming user to the fBS and another contour for an outgoing user from the fBS).
In one implementation of a method of the present invention, where the coverage area Afem may not be available, but the total coverage area of a user's premises may be classified into K premise types (e.g., a studio, small apartment, large apartment, house, or office), a predetermined coverage area may be assigned for the premises for the purpose of calculating the transmit power, according to the premise type.
According to the present invention, various criteria based on SNR may be used to set the power level at the fBS. These criteria may include (a) average SNR at the fBS, (b) average SNR at the MSs, (c) average SNR at the fBS and the MSs, (d) minimum SNRs at the fBS (for different time scales), (e) minimum SNRs at the MSs (at different time scales), and (f) minimum SNRs at the fBS and minimum SNRs at the MSs (at different time scales). The received signals may show smaller variations for a small apartment, so that short-term averages would provide information for necessary power levels, while typically much larger variations are expected for a large house, thereby necessitating long-term averages.
Apart from the received SNR, the fBS may utilize some other metrics for setting its transmission power at step 156 of
The transmission power level may be determined using, for example, the following method. From equations (4)-(8) above, in a femtocell interference-limited coverage area (ILCA) environment with equal path loss exponents, circular coverage area Afem is given by
In a power-controlled femtocell environment, the femtocell provides a coverage area Afem at all times by adjusting its transmission power P2 (which is calculated for a given Afem). Equation (31) may be rearranged to:
which may be simplified to:
The required power level P2 that provides coverage area Afem may be solved by finding the roots of the second order polynomial of equation (32). Equation (13) above relates the transmit power levels P1 and P2 to the coverage areas of the mBS and the fBS, respective, for a network in which n≧2, n being any arbitrary path loss exponent. As discussed above, equation (13) represents the case where n=2, but with a different pair of transmit powers. The techniques above may be used to calculate the required transmit power P1.
The above detailed description is provided to illustrate the specific embodiments of the present invention, and is not intended to be limiting. Numerous variations and modifications are possible within the scope of the present invention. The present invention is set forth in the following claims.
The present application is related to and claims priority of U.S. Provisional Patent Applications (“Copending Applications”) (a) “Femtocell Channel Assignment for Improved Femtocell Coverage and Efficient Cell Search,” Ser. No. 61/055,345, filed on May 22, 2008; and (b) “Joint Power Control and Frequency Assignment for Femtocells,” Ser. No. 61/073,276, filed on Jun. 17, 2008.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5657343 | Schilling | Aug 1997 | A |
5809423 | Benveniste | Sep 1998 | A |
5920819 | Asanuma | Jul 1999 | A |
5960352 | Cherpantier | Sep 1999 | A |
6212386 | Briere et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6212405 | Jiang et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6438379 | Gitlin et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6751444 | Meiyappan | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6792276 | Butovitsch et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6853845 | Hsu et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6961577 | Nagato et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6975865 | Vaisanen | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6999725 | Nitta et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7058416 | Wang | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7142861 | Murai | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7483704 | Shimada et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
8160591 | Xu et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
20020098860 | Pecen et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020177444 | Nagato et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030017829 | Ching-Hsiang et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030109284 | Akerberg et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20050059403 | Wang | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050130662 | Murai | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050148336 | Nagato et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20060154684 | Meiyappan | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060276197 | Heo | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070087738 | Melkesetian | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070183427 | Nylander et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070242769 | Yang | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070254620 | Lindqvist et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070270151 | Claussen et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080232320 | Lee et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090040972 | Robson et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090052395 | Bao et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090081970 | Yavuz et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090082031 | Kim et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090088083 | Fujii et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090131070 | Tajima et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090186623 | Matsuzawa | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20100120438 | Kone et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100216478 | Buddhikot et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20110003597 | Budic et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110194495 | Seo et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO 2005011156 | Feb 2005 | WO |
2007139460 | Dec 2007 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090291690 A1 | Nov 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61055345 | May 2008 | US | |
61073276 | Jun 2008 | US |