Fermentation byproduct feed formulation and processing

Information

  • Patent Application
  • 20050255220
  • Publication Number
    20050255220
  • Date Filed
    September 11, 2003
    21 years ago
  • Date Published
    November 17, 2005
    19 years ago
Abstract
The invention is to products for enhancing the nutrient value of distillers, brewers or fermenters grain byproducts using an injector or mixer to add predetermined amounts of nutrients to the grains. The byproduct nutrient obtained is heated, dried and/or extruded to increase the ruminant bypass protein of the nutrient product.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of Invention


This invention concerns the formulation and processing of fermentation byproducts into useful feed products.


2. Description of Related Art


In the animal agricultural industry, a great deal of effort has been placed into providing nutritional high quality feed materials. Fermentation byproducts have been fed to domestic animals for hundreds of years in both in wet and dried form. Fermentation processes tend to concentrate nutrients in the by-products, such as, for example, corn, wheat, and/or barley, by using up the fermentable carbohydrates. Some vitamins and other nutrients are increased by the (yeast) fermentation process. For example, corn, which contains about 8% crude protein, is increased to a protein level of about 22% to 28%, on a 12% to 13% moisture level. Fat and fiber in spent corn are also typically increased to at least double their original levels through concentration.


Corn is a good candidate for fermentation due to its relatively high carbohydrate content. However, the low protein content of the grain in general, and its low content of the amino acid lysine, leads to low levels of these nutrients in the spent grain.


The spent grain has traditionally been sold to the animal feed industry as a product known as “distillers dried grain w/sol(DDGS)”, “distillers dried grains (DDG),” and “wet distillers grains (WDG),” or “wet brewers grain (WBG),” and “dried brewers grain (DBG).” With much of the carbohydrate used up in the fermentation process and the relatively low levels of protein and energy, fermented grain has been of little interest to the poultry and swine industries. As a result, the majority of the fermentation byproducts from distillers and brewers, e.g., fermented grains, have been used as feeds for ruminants, including dairy cows.


In today's modern dairy operations ruminant animal rations are formulated with different ingredients to provide precise levels of degradable protein to the ruminant animal rumen bacteria and rumen undegradable protein (RUP) (also referred to as UIP or undegradable intake protein) in the ruminant animals' lower gastrointestinal tracts. Animal rations are also balanced to provide known levels of specific amino acids to the animals' lower gastrointestinal tracts.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The systems and methods according to this invention use grain fermentation byproducts in general and, in one exemplary embodiment, distilling industry byproducts, as base ingredients in the production of an animal feed or an animal feed supplement to improve the value of the distillers, fermenters and brewers by-products.


The systems and methods according to this invention allow a user, such as, for example, a brewer, fermenter and/or distiller, to use existing equipment with very little additional capital investment and achieve a high nutrient value ruminant animal feed and/or feed supplement compatible with today's sophisticated ration balancing programs.


The systems and methods according to this invention permit a user to realize improved drying efficiency of by-products by the use of other grain, grain byproduct or nutrient additives that have a lower moisture level than the wet distillers and/or brewers byproducts and can absorb moisture so that less moisture needs to be removed to achieve an end product with a moisture level of, for example, from about 0% to about 14%.


The systems and methods of this invention dry the resultant product/mixture at a dryer temperature of from between about 200° F. to about 1000° F. until the moisture level in the mixture is between about 0% to 14% by weight, and the temperature of the mixture at the end of drying is between about 180° F. to about 250° F.


The systems and methods of this invention cool the resultant product/mixture, including, for example, by ambient air cooling, to a temperature of about 200° F. or below, if desired.


The systems and methods according to this invention allow any brewer, distiller or fermenter to increase the nutrient value of their byproducts in a predictable manner.


In one exemplary embodiment of the systems and methods of this invention, a user can increase the nutrient value of byproducts by injecting specific nutrient sources into the wet end of the processes and after fermentation and/or distillation procedures.


The systems and methods according to this invention permit users to produce a large variety of nutritional supplements depending on the purchaser's specifications. Sophisticated nutritional and economic demands of the animal agricultural industry are achieved in a predictable manner using the systems, methods and resultant products according to this invention.


According to the systems and methods of this invention, the specific nutrient sources injected into/added to the wet end of the process can be used to determine to which animal species the upgraded product will be fed.


The nutritionally enhanced mixture produced according to the systems, methods and resultant products according to this invention may be fed wet or dry to animals. The form that the product takes for feeding can vary depending on the target animal species, nutrient specifications desired, nutrient density and the shipping distances involved.


The systems and methods according to this invention alter configuration of proteins in the mixture of wet distillers, brewers or fermenters grains and added nutrients using heat from drying and/or extruding the mixture, including mixtures usable as protein supplements produced for ruminant feeds including the dairy and/or beef industries. The heating which affects the RUP/UIP, where UIP is used to represent undegraded intake protein, and RUP is used to represent rumen undegraded protein, is performed after the nutrients are added to the wet distiller's, brewers or fermenters grains and/or during mixing of the wet distiller's grains, brewer's grains, fermenter's grains, with nutrients.


In various exemplary embodiments, the systems and methods according to this invention use equipment such as dryers and extruders that are already in place and conventionally used to produce the non-nutritionally enhanced fermentation byproducts.


In various exemplary embodiments, the systems and methods according to this invention mix nutrients with distillers, brewers or fermenters byproducts prior to final processing of those byproducts.


In various exemplary embodiments, the systems and methods according to this invention produce a nutritionally enhanced distiller's, brewer's or fermenter's grain byproduct that may be used by feed managers to produce a complete feed.


Certain exemplary embodiments of the systems and methods according to this invention also add minerals, energy sources, other protein, vitamins and other nutrients to feed materials to meet customer demands.


The systems and methods according to this invention permit a distiller, brewer or fermenter for example, to predict, and achieve predicted, nutrient values of a dried end product, including a particular bypass protein (RUP/UIP) level and amino acid content.


The systems and methods according to this invention permit a distiller, brewer or fermenter for example, to predict the digestible bypass protein (RUP/UIP) and digestible amino acids delivered to a ruminant's lower gastrointestinal tract, and the nutrient values of a dried end product, including a particular bypass protein (RUP/UIP) level and amino acid content.


The systems and methods according to this invention alter the drying time and/or amount of heat applied to mixtures of wet distiller's, brewer's or fermenter's grain byproducts and nutrients in terms of time of the byproducts and nutrients exposed to heat and maximum temperatures, which are within predetermined amounts, to predictably control, and achieve a desired, RUP/UP protein content of the nutritionally enhanced byproducts.


The methods according to this invention will produce an improved distillers, brewers or fermenters grain by-product by establishing desired nutritional values for the product to be produced, including a desired ruminant animal bypass protein range and amino acid levels. The enhanced product is produced by determining nutrients and nutrient amounts to be added to the by-product to achieve the targeted nutritional values, including bypass protein and amino acid levels, of the nutritionally enhanced distillers, brewer or fermenter grain by-product after processing. The determined amounts of nutrients are mixed with wet distillers, brewers or fermenters grains. The mixture of wet distillers, brewers or fermenters grains and nutrients is dried at a dryer temperature or temperatures between from about 200° F. to about 1,000° F. until the moisture level in the mixture is between from about 0% to about 14%, the mixture is in a temperature range of from about 180° F. to about 250° F., and the heat has increased the bypass protein level of the mixture to be within the desired ruminant animal bypass protein range.


The systems according to this invention produce an improved distillers, brewers or fermenters grain by-product by establishing desired nutritional values for the product to be produced, including a desired ruminant animal bypass protein range and amino acid levels. The enhanced product is produced by determining nutrients and nutrient amounts to be added to the by-product to achieve the targeted nutritional values, including bypass protein and amino acid levels, of the nutritionally enhanced distillers, brewer or fermenter grain by-product after processing. According to the systems and methods of this invention, the determined amounts of nutrients are mixed with wet distillers, brewers or fermenters grains. According to the systems and methods of this invention, the mixture of wet distillers, brewers or fermenters grains and nutrients is dried at a dryer temperature or temperatures between from about 200° F. to about 1000° F. until the moisture level in the mixture is between from about 0% to about 14%, the mixture is in a temperature range of from about 180° F. to about 250° F., and the heat has increased the bypass protein level of the mixture to be within the desired ruminant animal bypass protein range.




BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a highly schematic diagram of one exemplary embodiment of a system according to the invention.



FIGS. 2 and 3 display a flowchart of one exemplary embodiment of a method according to the invention.




DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS


FIG. 1 shows one exemplary embodiment of a system of this invention, which includes typical fermentation/distillation processing equipment, such as, for example, one or more fermentation apparatus(es) (100)one or more distillation apparatus(es)(200), mixer(s)(300), extruder(s) (400), centrifuge(s) (500), dryer(s) (600), cooler(s), including air coolers, (700), packaging or containerizing apparatus (800), and temperature control device(s) that may optionally be applied to any or all of the aforementioned devices 100 through 800. These devices are connected via suitable means, such as, for example, electrical, electronic, mechanical and electromechanical devices and/or system. It should be understood that the systems, methods and resultant products according to this invention can use existing fermentation and distillation byproduct generation facilities and equipment, and/or new facilities and equipment. Moreover, one or more or all of the elements of the system may be controlled manually and/or by suitable electronic processing control equipment and/or software including, for example, controller 900. Controller 900 may employ hardware and/or software control elements. Elements 100 through 900 may be interconnected via interconnection means and/or bus 1000.



FIG. 2 shows one exemplary embodiment of the methods according to this invention for producing a nutritionally enhanced fermentation byproduct to achieve a nutritionally enhanced feed and/or feed supplement. The method commences in step S1000. Control then proceeds to step S1010, where desired nutritional values for an end product such as, for example, a mixture of wet distiller's, brewers or fermenters grain byproducts and nutrients are selected or determined. The desired nutritional values can be obtained, for example, from published data or, for example, determined on a case-by-case basis based on an analysis of nutrient deficiencies in animals to which the feed and/or feed supplement is to be fed or, for example from product specifications supplied by a customer. In one exemplary embodiment of the methods according to this invention, for simplicity, only two ingredients, e.g., wet corn distillers grains with solubles and 48% soybean meal, are used. In this exemplary embodiment of the systems and methods according to the invention, the nutrient formulas for two products of differing protein contents are established and the ingredients are processed after being mixed in the wet stage. Table 1 shows nutrient values for a high quality corn distillers grain with solubles. This particular product has a crude protein (CP) value of 30.3% on a dry matter (DM) basis and an undegradable protein (RUP/UP) value of 45.6% of the crude protein (CP). It has a lysine level of 2.13% and methionine value of 2.07% expressed as a % of the undegradable protein (RUP/UIP). These values, particularly protein, will vary between distillery sources and will also vary, even more so, when other grains such as barley or wheat are used in the distillation process.


The second ingredient in Table 1 is high protein soybean meal. This feedstuff is widely available to the animal agricultural industry as a dry product with about 8 to 12% moisture content The values for crude protein, RUP/UIP and methionine and lysine are typical values used by the animal agricultural industry. The soybean meal has a high protein level, 54% of DM, but has a low RUP/UIP of only 31.4% of the protein. It also has a relatively poor amino acid profile with a deficiency of methionine as compared to lysine.

TABLE 1Values of Raw Materials% CP% UIP% UIPof% UIP% Methionine% LysineMethionineLysineIngredient% DMDMof CPof UIPof UIPof DMof DMCorn Dist Grains33.030.345.62.072.130.2860.294w/sol WetHigh Protein88.054.031.40.836.080.1411.031Soybean Meal


One may obtain a complete nutrient analysis of ingredients to be used in the formulation. If precise and repeatable results in the final product are not a high priority, standard values, such as those found in the National Research Council (NRC) reference, i.e., “Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle, Seventh Revised Edition, published by the Committee on Animal Nutrition, National Research Council, 381 pages, 2001, may be used.


Next, control proceeds to step S1020, where an end product target nutritional formulation is developed using existing computer programs and nutritional values for distiller's wet by products and other ingredients.


The methods according to this invention allow the user to accurately produce a highly sophisticated protein supplement for ruminant animals. Selection of the types of ingredients, ratios of the ingredients and control of the processing allows the user to accurately predict and manipulate the following nutrient parameters for the end product:


1. The amount of rumen degradable protein in the wet mixture that will be converted to bypass protein (RUP/UIP) during processing.


2. Levels of both rumen degradable and rumen undegradable protein in the end product.


3. Levels of amino acids in the rumen undegradable protein and rumen degradable protein of the end product.


4. Ratios of amino acids in the rumen undegradable protein (RUP/UIP) in the end product.


5. Ratios of amino acids in the rumen degradable protein of the end product.


6. Post rumen digestibility of the rumen undegradable protein (RUP/UIP).


7. Fat levels in the end product.


8. Fiber levels in the end product.


9. Mineral levels in the end product.


10. Vitamin levels in the end product.


11. pH of the end product.


12. Moisture levels of the end product.


The systems and methods of this invention permit adjustment of absolute values of nutrient parameters 1 through 6 in a predictable manner. Absolute values of nutrient parameters 7-11 may be adjusted using conventional systems and methods, usually at the wet end of the feed formulation process, and nutrient parameter 12, i.e., product moisture levels may be adjusted using conventional systems and methods, usually downstream of the wet end of the feed formulation process. The systems and methods of this invention also permit predictable adjustment of values of nutrient parameters 1-6 relative to each other and relative to nutrient parameters 7-12.


According to the methods of the invention, the desired nutrient target(s) for the end product are selected on a finished dry product basis, i.e. a product with about 0-about 14% moisture. This can be done in consultation with customers and nutritionists to identify the needs of the target animals in a supplement and/or needed for a complete feed. There are very sophisticated nutritional models, such as, for example, the CPM-Dairy program, which is a well known dairy ration evaluation and formulation computer program, and excellent reference materials, such as the aforementioned NRC publication, known and available to those skilled in the art to facilitate the determination of nutrient specifications.


For this exemplary embodiment, the following table, Table 2, provides the target nutrient specifications for the two products that will be produced.

TABLE 2End Product Nutrient Targets% CP% UIP% Methionine% Lysine% UIP Methionine% UIP LysineProduct% DMof DMof CPof UIPof UIPof DMof DM40% Protein88.045.4575.01.604.80.5451.63638% Protein88.043.1875.01.704.50.5511.457


Referring again to FIG. 2, control then moves to step S1020 where a (wet basis) formula is determined to deliver the desired end results, i.e., a product with the desired nutritional values. With knowledge of the composition of the wet material, i.e. brewers, fermenters or distillers wet grains, a formula is determined to deliver the desired nutrients when the product has been processed. One method of formula determination involves converting the wet spent grain data to a dry matter basis and then proportioning it with similar dry matter data on the other ingredients in the mixture. This results in a formulation on a dry matter basis, which may be converted to wet weights for the purpose of weighing and mixing.


The following two tables (Tables 3 and 4) provide wet basis formulas to produce 2000 pounds (1 ton) of a finished product on a dry matter basis.

TABLE 3Formula-40% Protein ProductDry MatterWet weightIngredientWeight LBSLBSCorn Dist Grains w/sol Wet721.52186.4High Protein Soybean Meal1278.51452.8









TABLE 4










Formula-38% Protein Product












Dry Matter
Wet weight



Ingredient
Weight LBS
LBS















Corn Dist Grains w/sol Wet
913.1
2767.0



High Protein Soybean Meal
1086.9
1235.1










Use of the above formulas will result in the following nutritional values (Table 5), based on their wet analysis.

TABLE 5Calculated Analysis Before Processing% CP% UIP% Methionine% Lysine% UIP Methionine% UIP LysineProduct% DMof DMof CPof UIPof UIPof DMof DM40% Protein55.045.4534.821.2204.8340.1930.76538% Protein50.043.1835.951.3344.4750.2070.695


Comparison of Tables 2 and 5 reveals significant differences in the target nutrient values set forth in Table 2 and the actual nutritional values obtained simply by mixing the feeds. These differences are provided to the final feed or feed supplement product according to the systems and methods of the invention.


Control then proceeds to step S1030 where a decision is made whether to premix the wet distillers grains and the nutrient sources in an existing wet distiller's grains production line, or to mix them offline, such as, for example, in an off-line mixer. If it is decided to premix the ingredients offline, the control moves to step S1040, where the ingredients are premixed with the wet distiller's grains. If it is decided to mix the ingredients with wet distillers grains online, then control proceeds to step S1050. In any event, the (wet) materials are mixed according to the aforementioned formula.


In various exemplary embodiments of the invention, the mixing can be done either in a separate batch mixer, or the materials which are added to the wet corn distillers grains can be injected into the wet corn distillers grains transport system (belt or auger) just prior to the dryer. In this exemplary embodiment, a batch mixer was used.


Using a batch mixer, the ingredients were weighed using calibrated scales and placed in a mixer. In various embodiments of the systems and methods according to the invention, one may use for example, a double ribbon mixer, a paddle mixer, a rotary mixer, etc. With the addition of the last material in the formulation, the mixer is set to operate for a predetermined time. The time necessary for the mixing should be determined using known scientific principles to identify the lowest coefficient of variation for that mix in the particular mixer.


Control then proceeds to step S1060 where a determination is made whether to extrude the mixture. If so, control proceeds to step S1070, and the mixture is extruded, with or without heat added thereto, and continues from there to step S1080. The mixture may be extruded either before the dryer or after partially removing the moisture in the dryer. If an extruder is used either before or after the drier care should be taken not to apply excess heat to alter the temperature of the mixture, such as, for example, to raise the temperature of the resultant product mixture to above about 250° F., which normally reduces the post ruminal digestibility of the RUP/UIP protein. If not, control proceeds directly to a dryer in step S1080 to feed the extruded mixture into the dryer and continues after drying to step S1090. In various exemplary embodiments of the invention, the dryer may have many different configurations depending, for example, on the size and scale of the processing operation. Processing temperatures will vary depending on a number of factors, including the efficiency of the equipment, but typically are in the range of from about 200° F. to about 1000° F. It should be noted that the processing temperatures may be above 250° C., to achieve a resultant end product temperature far below that, such as, for example, between about 180° C. and about 250° C. The product exposure time in the dryer will also depend on the efficiency of applying the heat to the product.


The processing temperature used and the time of exposure will result in a final mixture temperature which will dictate the degree of conversion of rumen degradable protein to rumen undegradable protein (RUP/UIP) and the post rumen digestibility of the rumen undegradable protein. In general the higher the processing temperature and the longer the processing time the higher the resulting temperature of the mixture and the more rumen undegradable protein (RUP/UIP) produced. However, the temperature of the mixture should not exceed, in general, about 250° F. to avoid lowering the post ruminal digestibility of the RUP/UIP to an undesirable level. Results of testing at higher end product temperatures show reductions in pepsin digestibility of 20% or more when end product temperatures exceeds 230° F. Some reduction in pepsin digestibility may be acceptable based on the experience and professional judgment of the customer. Pepsin digestibility is an important characteristic of the end product and can be varied according to user demands. Acceptable final product temperatures have typically fallen within a temperature range of from about 180° F. to about 250° F.


The following two tables (Tables 6 and 7) provide a comparison of the nutrient values of the two example products before and after processing. Values are presented on a finished product (mixture) basis (12% moisture). Table 13 provides a comparison of all projected nutrient values and those nutrient values actually obtained. The final moisture level of the finished product normally will not exceed about 14% to prevent spoilage during shipment and storage.

TABLE 640% Product% CP% UIP% UIPof% UIP% Methionine% LysineMethionineLysine% DMDMof CPof UIPof UIPof DMof DMBefore88.045.4534.821.2204.8340.1930.765ProcessingAfter88.045.4575.001.5804.6700.5391.592Processing


The values of the product after processing in Table 6 and Table 7 were achieved at an end product temperature of about 218° F. The starting temperature was ambient temperature.

TABLE 738% Product% CP% UIP% Meth% Lys% UIP Meth% UIP Lys% DMof DMof CPof UIPof UIPof DMof DMBefore Processing88.043.1835.951.3344.4750.2070.695After Processing88.043.1875.001.7204.5210.5571.464


Analysis of Table 6 reveals that this exemplary embodiment of the systems and methods according to this invention resulted in a 115 percent increase of UIP (on a CP basis); a 30 percent increase of methionine (as a % of UIP) which then gives a 179 percent increase in UIP methionine (as a percentage of DM); and a 3.4 percent decrease of lysine (as a percentage of UIP) but an increase of 108 percent UIP lysine (as a percentage of DM). Analysis of Table 7 reveals that this exemplary embodiment of the systems and methods according to this invention resulted in a 108 percent increase of UIP (on a CP basis); a 29 percent increase of methionine (as a percentage of UIP) which then gives a 169 percent increase in UIP methionine (as a percentage of DM); and a 1.0 percent decrease of lysine (as a percentage of UIP) but an increase of 111 percent UIP lysine (as a percentage of DM).


Next, control proceeds to step S1100, where the mixture is cooled, for example, air cooled to a temperature of about 200° F. or below, if needed. From step S100 control proceeds to step S1110 where a determination is made whether to package the cooled product. If the product is to be cooled, such as, for example, by ambient or forced air, control then proceeds to step S1120 where the end product is packaged. Then control proceeds to step S1130, where it would have proceeded directly had the product not been determined to be packaged. In step S1130, the end product is shipped or transported to its final destination. Then the process ends in step S1140.


The aforementioned exemplary embodiments of the products according to the invention provide an indication of the increase in RUP/UIP protein and the amino acid levels and manipulation of the amino acid ratios in the RUP/UIP protein that is added to fermentation byproducts according to the systems, methods and resultant products of this invention. Other exemplary embodiments that have been obtained that demonstrate that the resulting feed products, including feed supplements, made using the systems and methods of this invention achieve a predictable amount of bypass protein (RUP/UIP) and amino acid content and amino acid ratios in the finished products.


In other exemplary embodiments of the systems and methods according to this invention starts with 10 percent high protein soybean meal and 90 percent wet distillers grains. The high protein soybean meal is then increased by an additional amount, such as, for example, 10 percent for each new formulation until the mixture has about 90 percent soybean meal and 10 percent wet distillers grains.


Other exemplary embodiments of the systems, methods and resultant products according to this invention repeats the aforementioned method may use, for example, canola meal in lieu of, or in addition to, soybean meal.


Other exemplary embodiments of the systems, methods and resultant products according to this invention may use mixtures of canola meal and high protein soybean meal and add a mixture, such as, for example 5% high protein soybean meal and 5% canola meal to 90% wet distillers grains, and continue to vary the relative amounts of protein mix and wet distillers grains, as above.


In another exemplary embodiment of the systems and methods according to the invention, nine batches of a formulation of 66.4% wet corn dist grains and 33.6% high protein soybean meal were mixed using mechanical equipment and then were dried in a rotary dryer. The dryer consisted of an open vessel that was controlled with a thermocouple to maintain exact temperatures. A temperature probe was inserted into the mixture and readings were monitored throughout the drying procedure.


The temperature of the mixture increased rapidly to a range of 208° F. to 210° F. and remained constant for the approximate 2 hours of drying regardless of the temperature of the vessel. A range of drying temperatures from 350° F. to 500° F. were used. At the conclusion of the drying, the temperature of the mixture would rapidly rise indicating that the moisture of the mixture was reduced and the mixture was removed from the heat source and cooled. The mixtures were allowed to reach different end temperatures and thus different end moisture levels.


Samples of the cooled product were analyzed. Results of the analyses are shown in Tables 8-16 One part of each sample was used for wet chemistry tests (shown in Table 16), including amino acid analysis, (shown in Table 15). Another part of each sample was inserted into the rumen of a fistulated dairy cow. A standard 16 hour RUP/UIP was measured and the resulting RUP/UIP was then tested for pepsin digestibility and for amino acid content. These results are shown in Tables 14 and 15.


Regression analysis of the RUP/UIP of the nine batches heated and dried according to the methods described above yielded the following results. The R Square value of the nutrient values of the nine batches indicates that 85.68% of the variation in UIP is the result of the end temperature of the mixture. This results in a calculated significance level of 0.0343%, which means that 99.97% of the time, this RUP/UIP increase will occur. In other words, these results are highly predictable and repeatable.


The results of a regression analysis as shown in Tables 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12 clearly indicate that the bypass protein (RUP/UIP) content, expressed as a percentage of the crude protein is controlled and changed in a predicable manner by the temperature of the end product. The higher the temperature, the higher the bypass protein (RUP/UIP). The duration of the temperature, or variations in applied temperature do not appear to significantly influence this relationship. In the pilot plant in which the results set forth above were obtained, the drying times were in excess of two hours and the product was held at a temperature near the boiling point of water for most of that time.


Based on results as shown in Table 8, it is evident that the bypass protein RUP/UIP) of the nutritionally enhanced fermentation byproduct may be controlled based on the temperature of the end product, whether it is a complete feed or a feed supplement. A formula expressing this relationship is:

UIP(% of CP)=(End Temp×0.819)−107.644, (R2=85.68%)  (1)


Using equation (1) one can calculate the RUP/UIP of a mixture. For example, i.e., if the end temperature is 220° F., then the RUP/UIP will be 0.819 times 220 minus 107.644, which equals 72.54% RUP/UIP.


The data shown in Table 9 also reveal that pepsin digestibility was less predictable based on the product end temperature, but reached significant levels. The data was analyzed as a linear regression, but it appears that the one sample that had the highest bypass protein (RUP/UIP) had a depressed pepsin digestibility, making the relationship between bypass protein (RUP/UIP) and pepsin digestibility quadratic. It was also apparent that too much heat (amount and/or duration) adversely affects the pepsin digestibility of the end product. End temperature can range from 211° F. to 223° F. for the production of acceptable product without undue losses in digestibility.

TABLE 8Regression Analysis of Experimental MixturesREGRESSION OF UIP % OF CP AND END TEMPERATURESSUMMARY OUTPUTUIP % CPEnd TempAverage19553.6821874.5022982.9320865.8721867.4820962.0721465.3220863.3121462.75Regression StatisticsMultiple R0.9256589R Square0.856844399Adjusted R Square0.836393598Standard Error3.338503243Observations9ANOVAdfSSMSFSignificance FRegression1466.9767529466.976752941.897842140.000342787Residual778.0192273211.1456039Total8544.9959802StandardCoefficientsErrort StatP-valueLower 95%Upper 95%Lower 95.0%Upper 95.0%Intercept107.64409226.91669969−3.99915640.00519549−171.2919273−43.9962566−171.2919273−43.99625659X Variable 10.8189807430.1265254426.472854250.0003427870.5197958291.1181656560.5197958291.118165656









TABLE 9








REGRESSION OF PEPSIN DIG. AND END TEMPERATURES







SUMMARY OUTPUT











0.0002%



End Temp
Pepsin Dig







195
79.52



218
63.11



229
43.13



208
54.02



218
59.63



209
64.19



214
63.11



208
62.31



214
67.67











Regression Statistics













Multiple R
0.801941608



R Square
0.643110343



Adjusted R Square
0.592126107



Standard Error
6.272275244



Observations
9











ANOVA















df
SS
MS
F
Significance F







Regression
1
496.2491651
496.2491651
12.6139055
0.009323658



Residual
7
275.3900571
39.34143673



Total
8
771.6392222





















Standard









Coefficients
Error
t Stat
P-value
Lower 95%
Upper 95%
Lower 95.0%
Upper 95.0%





Intercept
241.3064906
50.57025165
4.771708321
0.002031694
121.7269327
360.8860485
121.7269327
360.8860485


X Variable 1
−0.8442595
0.237712034
−3.55160604
0.009323658
−1.406358733
−0.28216026
−1.406358733
−0.282160258









Another statistically significant result of these examples is that the bypass protein (RUP/UIP) content is inversely related to the moisture content of the end product (Table 12). This relationship is described by the regression equation:

UIP(% of CP)=87.536−(1.133×Moisture), (R2=95.58%).  (2)


This equation also calculates the RUP/UIP of a mixture, but based on its end moisture content after drying. Accordingly, the RUP/UIP for a product with an end moisture of 1% will be 1.133 times 11 subtracted from 87.536, which equals 75.07% RUP/UIP.


This appears to be due to the fact that the dryer moisture content increased when the end product was allowed to reach a temperature above the boiling point of water. These experiments were done at ambient atmospheric pressure. The aforementioned data indicate that there is an ideal temperature and moisture point range which includes about 218° F. and about 12% water moisture content.


Moreover, experiments indicate that the drying temperature, measured, for example, by the temperature of the vessel in which the heating took place, apparently only affects pepsin digestibility, and the relationship between the temperature and the pepsin digestibility is relatively weak (Table 11). The one value for the lowest heating (350° F.) caused the relationship to approach significance but all other values within normal range are basically random.


A regression analysis of UIP % of CP and vessel temperatures (Table 10) for the nine batches reveals that the R Square value is close to zero and, thus, there does not appear to be a predictable relationship between the vessel temperature (drying temperature) and the UIP content.

REGRESSION OF UIP % OF CP AND VESSEL TEMPERATURES Table 10SUMMARY OUTPUTUIP % CPVessel TempAverage35053.6845074.5045082.9350065.8750067.4847562.0747565.3247563.3147562.75Regression StatisticsMultiple R0.331847778R Square0.110122948Adjusted R Square−0.01700235Standard Error8.323627442Observations9ANOVAdfSSMSFSignificance FRegression160.0165637260.016563720.8662552090.382970754Residual7484.979416569.28277379Total8544.9959802StandardCoefficientsErrort StatP-valueLower 95%Upper 95%Lower 95.0%Upper 95.0%Intercept38.5308192130.108926931.2797141290.241424449−32.66542866109.7270671−32.66542866109.7270671X0.0605146890.065018640.9307283220.382970754−0.0932298530.214259231−0.0932298530.214259231Variable 1















REGRESSION OF PEPSIN DIGESTIBILITY AND VESSEL TEMPERATURE Table 11







SUMMARY OUTPUT











0.0002%



Vessel Temp
Pepsin Dig







350
79.52



450
63.11



450
43.13



500
54.02



500
59.63



475
64.19



475
63.11



475
62.31



475
67.67











Regression Statistics













Multiple R
0.56885562



R Square
0.323596717



Adjusted R Square
0.226967676



Standard Error
8.634972937



Observations
9











ANOVA















df
SS
MS
F
Significance F







Regression
1
249.6999188
249.6999188
3.348855739
0.109947303



Residual
7
521.9393034
74.56275763



Total
8
771.6392222




















Coefficients
Standard Error
t Stat
P-value
Lower 95%
Upper 95%
Lower 95.0%
Upper 95.0%





Intercept
118.7711864
31.2351521
3.802484651
0.006693083
44.91184111
192.6305318
44.91184111
192.6305318


X
−0.1234339
0.067450663
−1.82998791
0.109947303
−0.282929259
0.036061462
−0.282929259
0.036061462


Variable 1









A regression analysis of pepsin digestibility and vessel temperature for the nine batches reveals that the R Square value is a little higher, but a long way from indicating a significant relationship between the vessel temperature and the pepsin digestibility. However, the P value shows that the relationship is approaching significance and is close to 10%.


A regression analysis of UIP % of CP and final moisture (Table 12) for the nine batches reveals the highest correlation that we have in the data set with the R Square showing that 95.58% of the variation in UIP content is related to the moisture of the end product. What this means in practical terms is that the increase in RUP/UIP can be achieved by drying the mixed product to a final moisture content of about 8 to 12%, provided the end product reaches the desirable temperature of 211 to 223° F.


However, the relationship of end moisture level to RUP/UIP appears to be an anomaly because in subsequent research moisture levels approaching 0% were measured in relation to achieving the desirable RUP/UIP.


The regression analysis statistics for the nine batches are set forth in the product mixture Tables 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12.

REGRESSION OF UIP % OF CP AND FINAL MOISTURE Table 12SUMMARY OUTPUTUIP % CPH2OAverage29.3053.6812.3074.504.2082.9319.2065.8719.0067.4824.5062.0719.9065.3218.0063.3121.2062.75Regression StatisticsMultiple R0.97763147R Square0.955763291Adjusted R Square0.949443761Standard Error1.855833613Observations9ANOVAdfSSMSFSignificance FRegression1520.8871514520.8871514151.23961815.39244E−06Residual724.10882883.4441184Total8544.9959802CoefficientsStandard Errort StatP-valueLower 95%Upper 95%Lower 95.0%Upper 95.0%Intercept87.536342961.82396422247.992357474.46139E−1083.2233560291.8493299183.2233560291.84932991X−1.133136950.092140299−12.29795185.39244E−06−1.351013983−0.91525992−1.351013983−0.915259924Variable 1


Experimental Results-average of 9 samples

TABLE 13Mixture: Wet Corn Dist Grains 66.4%, High Protein Soybean Meal 33.6%Calculated ValuesNutrientfor MixtureTargetWetDryActualNutrients, % of SampleDry Matter88.00049.47889.42188.40Neutral Detergent Fiber8.91918.50616.23Effective NDF0.8061.5430.00Crude Protein40.00022.70040.55838.66CP Sol Protein3.6248.2654.44UIP30.0008.07515.25828.80ADF Protein1.7803.0032.42Fat3.1335.8055.45Acid Det Fibre5.7149.83810.14Ash2.8964.4534.33NSC Starch11.61717.40729.67NDF Lignin0.7801.5342.25Sol Protein NPN2.0835.312NDF Insoluble Protein3.2483.8995.21UIP Amino Acids, % of SampleMethionine0.1480.1990.46Lysine0.3890.6561.35Arginine0.4510.7781.70Threonine0.3200.4901.13Leucine0.8791.1192.83Isoleucine0.3640.5591.25Valine0.4390.7041.45Histidine0.2000.3090.73Phenylalanine0.4380.6361.51Tryptophan0.1320.209Methionine, % of UIP1.6101.8301.5601.58Lysine, % of UIP4.7004.8105.1504.67Isoleucine, % of UIP4.5104.3904.34UIP % CP75.00035.57037.62074.50Lysine to Methionine ratio2.6283.3012.96Total Amino Acids, % of SampleMethionine0.3420.6700.57Lysine1.1912.1471.96Arginine1.4302.6162.31Threonine0.8561.5581.44Leucine1.9813.4763.54Isoleucine0.9591.7801.61Valine1.1172.0481.87Histidine0.6131.0871.02Phenylalanine1.7723.2621.88Tryptophan0.2760.494Minerals, % of SampleCalcium0.1280.2290.38Phosphorus0.3720.6650.69Magesium0.1540.2760.29Potassium0.9111.6281.35Sulphur0.2540.4550.46Sodium0.0560.0990.12Chloride0.0510.0900.17Trace Minerals, ppmIron62.264111.246103.21Zinc28.58651.07348.99Copper5.71710.21518.12Manganese17.66131.55423.06















“In vivo” Data on Experimental Mixtures Table 14













Lab
16 hr






Analysis
bypass, % of CP

0.0002%


















Production Run Analysis


Prot
Cow

Cow
UIP
Pepsin
Dig. UIP



















Mixture
Vessel Temp
End Temp
End Moisture
Prot
H2O
DM Basis
“A”
Cow “B”
“C”
Average
Dig
% of CP






















1
350
195
33.8
31.57
29.30
44.65
55.76
55.85
49.44
53.68
79.52
42.69


2
450
218
12.1
38.38
12.30
43.76
75.57
73.62
74.32
74.50
63.11
47.02


3
450
229
5.3
42.46
4.20
44.32
86.20
80.84
81.76
82.93
43.13
35.77


4
500
208
na
35.17
19.20
43.53
71.84
68.74
57.03
65.87
54.02
35.58


5
500
218
18.4
32.94
19.00
40.67
69.28
69.50
63.66
67.48
59.63
40.24


6
475
209
20.1
31.51
24.50
41.74
61.32
57.93
66.96
62.07
64.19
39.84


7
475
214
17.8
34.37
19.90
42.91
69.15
62.42
64.39
65.32
63.11
41.22


8
475
208
18.3
36.38
18.00
44.37
66.30
58.51
65.11
63.31
62.31
39.45


9
475
214
na
35.50
21.20
45.05
61.06
62.95
64.23
62.75
67.67
42.46


Wet Corn Dist
air dry


24.87
22.70
32.17
44.08
43.81
48.86
45.58
26.01
11.86


48% Soy
Commercial


46.81
11.00
52.60
22.86
26.17
45.04
31.36
94.96
29.78


Dry Corn Dist
Commercial


30.54
7.00
32.84
49.62
53.81
50.83
51.42
24.87
12.79






















Amino Acid Analysis - gm/100 gm of Protein Table 15












Values after


Commercial



Drying Corn
Wet
Hi-Pro
Corn Dist



Dist and Soy
Corn Dist
Soy
Dried Gr












Amino Acids
Total AA
UIP AA
UIP AA
UIP AA
UIP AA















Methionine
1.43
1.59
2.07
1.70
2.23


Lysine
4.96
4.67
2.13
6.35
2.21


Arginine
5.75
5.92
3.34
6.87
3.53


Threonine
3.59
3.95
3.66
4.13
3.66


Leucine
8.79
9.85
14.75
8.68
13.99


Isoleucine
4.01
4.27
3.63
5.01
3.89


Valine
4.67
4.95
5.09
5.64
5.05


Histidine
2.54
2.54
2.15
2.66
2.34


Phenylalanine
4.68
5.23
5.65
5.30
5.59


Tryptophan







Cystine
1.64
1.60
1.88
1.82
2.01


Methionine +
3.07
3.19
3.96
3.52
4.24


Cystine


Tyrosine
3.30
3.73
4.39
3.96
4.24


Serine
4.02
4.75
4.41
4.30
4.22


Aspartic Acid
9.00
10.01
6.16
11.50
6.35


Glutamic Acid
15.46
18.11
19.35
16.76
18.61


Proline
4.94
5.67
7.86
4.86
7.92


Glyccine
3.74
3.90
3.12
4.34
3.30


Alanine
4.76
5.25
7.97
4.67
7.64


Hydroxyproline
0.13
0.12
0.27
0.00
0.20


Hydroxylysine
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00


Taurine
0.14
0.08
0.16
0.00
0.00


Lanthionine
0.02
0.07
0.13
0.06
0.13


Ornithine
0.09
0.25
0.05
0.05
0.08









Chemical Analysis of Experimental Mixtures

TABLE 16Values as % of Dry MatterCornCornExperimentalDDGDDGMixtureAirCom-Average of 9DriedSoy MealmercialMoisture20.0422.312.59.2Dry Matter79.9677.787.590.8Crude Protein, % DM42.9829.653.633.2Available Protein, % DM40.2925.552.127.1Unavailable Protein, % DM2.7041.56.1Neutral Det. Crude6.264.717.5Protein, % DMAdjusted Protein, % DM42.9828.553.630.4Soluble Protein, % DM5.213.3106.1Soluble Protein % of CP12.1311.318.618.4TDN, % DM84.8791.584.692Net Energy Lactation,0.9010.891Mcal/lbNet Energy Maintenance,0.951.030.941.04Mcal/lbNet Energy Gain, Mcal/lb0.650.720.640.72Acid Detergent Fiber,11.5221.13.921.1% DMNeutral Detergent18.7533.37.738Fiber, % DMCrude Fat, % DM6.1314.71.113.4Lignin, % DM2.5840.63.1Lignin/NDF Ratio13.80127.98.2Ash, % DM4.944.35.92.5Starch, % DM3.808.52.96.4Sugar, % DM10.154.911.15.8Enzymatic NSC, % DM13.9513.41412.2NFC, % DM33.5122.832.720.4Calcium, % DM0.440.090.680.03Phosphorus, % DM0.780.970.760.79Magnesium, % DM0.320.420.310.32Potassium, % DM1.511.082.030.81Sulfur, % DM0.530.470.420.72Sodium, % DM0.130.2220.0310.126Iron, PPM116.5218211788Manganese, PPM26.00193413Zinc, PPM55.92824545Copper, PPM21.2030186Chloride Ion, % DM0.200.270.030.24


In another exemplary embodiment of the systems and methods according to the invention, a number of different formulations of wet corn dist grains, soybean meal and in 2 instances blood meal were mixed and subsequently dried (Table 17). Whereas in the previously mentioned nine-batch exemplary embodiment, exact temperatures of the drying process were measured, a purpose of the instant exemplary embodiment was to test different formulations over a variety of simulated commercial situations.


In this instant exemplary embodiment, pure corn distillers grains and pure soybean meal were dried along with various mixtures of these two ingredients. The mixtures ranged from 48% wet corn dist grains—52% soybean meal to 17% wet corn dist grains—83% soybean meal.


Drying temperatures were tested from a low 257° F. to a high of 379° F. As in experiment #1, the temperature at the end of the drying period tends to rise and these are noted in Table 17(temperatures are dryer temp and not product temp).


The results clearly demonstrate that the RUP/UIP of the formulas is increased more than two-fold due to the heat applied during drying. The data also show that application of higher temperatures will impart greater RUP/UIP percentages; but, the higher heat will also decrease the pepsin digestibility as indicated by both the measurements at 0.02% and 0.0002% pepsin.


The RUP/UIP of corn distillers grains was increased to maximum levels by the application of lower dryer temperatures as compared to soybean meal. Soybean meal dried at the highest temperatures doubled in RUP/UIP content, but did not achieve levels equal to those of the 83% soybean meal—17% wet corn distillers grains formula. A Maillard reaction, which may account for the change in RUP/UIP, may involve a complexing of the protein with the carbohydrate during heating in the test material. In one treatment, sucrose was added to pure soybean meal with little effect. Simple sugars do not appear to be involved in this reaction, whereas, the complex polysaccharides of the corn distillers grains work very well. Maillard reactions are discussed extensively in the literature and derive from the seminal work by L.-C. Maillard, which appeared in Comptes Rendus Acad. Sci. Ser. 2, vol. 54, page 66 (1912).


Very high RUP/UIP values were achieved with all the formulations of wet corn distillers grains and soybean meal.


The systems, methods and resultant products of this invention do not need all of the processing to be performed by a distiller, brewer or fermenter. Instead, the fermentation byproducts can by transported, such as, for example, by a pipeline or truck, to another location for processing.


While this invention has been described in conjunction with the specific embodiments above, it is evident that many alternatives, combinations, modifications, and variations are apparent to those skilled in the art. Accordingly, the preferred embodiments of this invention, as set forth above are intended to be illustrative, and not limiting. Various changes can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of this invention.

TABLE 17Experiment #2BypassDryerAverageProtein, %0.02%0.0002%ProteinTemp atDryerHeatingof CPPepsin Dig.Pepsin Dig. atSample DescriptionpH% of DMEnd (° F.)Temp (° F.)Time (min)UIP at StartUIP at Endat Startat EndStartCorn Dist Grains - 100%29.325725724045.5871.2174.3972.1226.01Corn Dist Grains - 100%30.032028910545.5893.3074.3963.5926.01Soybean Meal - 100%52.73923796031.3665.6098.6495.5194.96Soy ML + 0.5% Sucrose53.53923796031.3667.4898.6492.5294.96Corn Dist 48%-Soy 52%42.839237910533.7079.3993.2586.8979.63Corn Dist 38%-Soy 62%5.346.239233010533.0376.8894.7087.9483.77Corn Dist 38%-Soy 62%46.133829812033.0362.9794.7091.7983.77Corn Dist 38%-Soy 62%46.532028910533.0364.2894.7092.1283.77Corn Dist 38%-Soy 62%44.925725715033.0364.5394.7094.0383.77Corn Dist 38%-Soy 62%4.944.139232210533.0368.4394.7086.8983.77Corn Dist 38%-Soy 62%5.545.639232211533.0369.5294.7079.3483.77Dist Sol 40%-Soy 60%48.73923306027.4466.9898.4790.1494.63Corn Dist 28%-Soy 72%49.339237910532.4681.0696.0188.3687.48Corn Dist 17%-Soy 83%6.052.43923799031.9776.6597.1590.0690.72Corn Dist 17%-Soy #2 83%50.93923798531.9771.9297.1593.0790.72Corn Dist 17%-Soy 83%4.050.03923798031.9766.8897.1592.5890.72Corn Dist 17%-Soy 83%7.248.33923798031.9776.2497.1593.5990.72Corn Dist 62%-Soy 26%-54.73923798056.3270.3294.2290.9284.96Blood 12%Corn Dist 43%-Soy 42%-57.93923798054.3682.9696.0593.4790.18Blood 15%

Claims
  • 1-36. (canceled)
  • 37. A method of enhancing the nutrient value of distillers, brewers or fermenters grain byproducts, comprising: adding one or more predetermined crude protein and/or amino acid content nutrient sources into the wet end of distillation or fermentation byproducts after at least one of fermentation and/or distillation to create a distillation and/or fermentation by-product-nutrient source mixture having an enhanced nutrient value; determining a by-product mixture nutrient level; and changing at least one of the bypass protein (RUP/UIP) level and the post ruminal digestibility of the by-product nutrient source mixture to achieve the determined by-product mixture nutrient level by changing the temperature of the by-product-nutrient source mixture.
  • 38. The method of claim 37, wherein temperature of the by-product mixture ranges from about 180° F. to about 250° F.
  • 39. The method of claim 38, wherein the temperature of the by-product mixture is about 218° F.
  • 40. The method of claim 37, wherein at least two of the bypass protein (RUP/UIP) level, amino acid levels in the RUP/UIP and the post ruminal digestibility of the by-product nutrient source mixture are changed to predetermined levels by changing the temperature of the by-product-nutrient source mixture.
  • 41. The method of claim 37, wherein the bypass protein (RUP/UIP) level, amino acid levels in the RUP/UIP and the post ruminal digestibility of the by-product nutrient source mixture are changed to predetermined levels by changing the temperature of the by-product-nutrient source mixture.
  • 42. A method of producing an improved distillers, brewers or fermenters grain by-product, comprising: establishing desirable nutritional values, including RUP/UIP levels and/or RUP/UIP amino acid levels for a nutritionally enhanced distillers, brewers or fermenters grain by-product; determining nutrients and nutrient amounts to be added to the by-product to achieve one or more nutritionally enhanced distillers, brewers or fermenters grain by-products that have at least one of different RUP/UIP and different RUP/UIP amino acid levels, than the established desirable values thereof; mixing determined amounts of one or more nutrients with wet distillers, brewers or fermenters grain; and heating the mixture of wet distillers grains and nutrients to achieve a by-product temperature between from about 180° F. to about 250° F. to change at least one of the bypass protein (RUP/UIP) level, amino acid levels in the RUP/UIP and the post ruminal digestibility of the mixture to achieve a mixture having the established desirable nutritional values.
  • 43. The method of claim 42, wherein the predetermined nutrient amounts are mixed with wet distillers, wet brewers or wet fermenters grain in an off-line mixer.
  • 44. The method of claim 42, wherein the predetermined nutrient amounts are premixed prior to being mixed with the wet distillers, wet brewers or wet fermenters grain.
  • 45. The method of claim 42, wherein the premixed nutrient amounts are added to the wet distillers, wet brewers or wet fermenters grain prior to drying.
  • 46. The method of claim 42, wherein the predetermined nutrient amounts are added to the wet distillers, wet brewers or wet fermenters grains both before being dried and while being dried.
  • 47. The method of claim 42, further comprising cooling the mixture to reach a temperature below about 200° F.
  • 48. The method of claim 42, further including extruding the mixture.
  • 49. The method of claim 48, further including applying heat to the mixture while extruding the mixture.
  • 50. The method of claim 42, wherein at least two of the bypass protein (RUP/UIP)-level, amino acid levels in the RUP/UIP and the post ruminal digestibility of the mixture are changed.
  • 51. The method of claim 42, wherein desirable nutritional values are established for crude protein, total amino acids, fat fiber, minerals, a ruminant animal bypass protein (RUP/UIP) range, amino acids in the RUP/UIP, and post ruminal digestibility of the RUP/UIP.
  • 52. A system for enhancing the nutrient value of distillers, brewers or fermenters grain byproducts, comprising: an injector to inject one or more predetermined crude protein and/or amino acid content nutrient sources into the wet end of distillers, brewers or fermenters grain distillation or fermentation byproduct creating process after at least one of a fermentation process and a distillation process to create an enhanced by-product-nutrient source mixture; and a heater to raise the temperature of, and dry, the by-product-nutrient source mixture to change the ruminant animal bypass protein of the by-product nutrient source mixture to one or more predetermined levels.
  • 53. The system of claim 52, wherein the heater applies heat to achieve a by-product temperature in a range of from about 180° F. to about 250° F.
  • 54. The system of claim 52, wherein the temperature is about 218° F.
  • 55. A system to produce an improved distillers, brewers or fermenters grain by-product, comprising: a system element to establish target nutritional values for a nutritionally enhanced distillers grain by-product; a system element to determine one or more nutrients and nutrient amounts to be added to the distillers, brewers or fermenters by-product that has a different RUP/UIP to achieve nutritionally enhanced distillers, brewers, or fermenters grain by-product that will meet the established target nutritional values after processing. a system element to mix the determined amounts of one or more nutrients with wet distillers, brewers or fermenters grains to achieve a nutritionally enhanced by-product mixture with nutrient values different than the established target nutritional values; and a system element to heat and dry the mixture of wet distillers, brewers or fermenters grains and nutrients to achieve a by-product temperature between from about 180° F. to about 250° F. to change at least one of the bypass protein (RUP/UIP) level, and the post ruminal digestibility of the by-product nutrient source mixture to the predetermined nutrient level to achieve a mixture having the established target nutritional values.
  • 56. The system of claim 55, further comprising a system element to mix the predetermined nutrient amounts with wet distillers, brewers or fermenters grains off-line.
  • 57. The system of claim 55, wherein the predetermined nutrient amounts are premixed prior to being mixed with the wet distillers, brewers or fermenters grains.
  • 58. The system of claim 57, wherein the premixed nutrient amounts are added to the wet distillers, brewers or fermenters grains prior to drying.
  • 59. The system of claim 57, wherein the predetermined nutrient amounts are added to the wet distillers, brewers or fermenters grains both before being dried and while being dried.
  • 60. The system of claim 55, further comprising a system element to cool the mixture to reach a temperature below about 200° F.
  • 61. The system of claim 55, further including a system element to extrude the mixture.
  • 62. The system of claim 61, wherein heat is applied heat to the mixture while the mixture is in the system element to extrude the mixture.
  • 63. The system of claim 55, wherein the target nutritional values include crude protein, total amino acids, fat fiber, minerals, a ruminant animal bypass protein (RUP/UIP) range, amino acids in the RUP/UIP and post ruminal digestibility of the RUP/UIP, and the nutrients and nutrient amounts to be added that may be added are of different RUP/UIP amino acid levels, known crude protein, total amino acid, fat, fiber mineral and energy levels.
  • 64. A feed or feed supplement made by the method of claim 37.
  • 65. A feed or feed supplement made by the method of claim 42.
  • 66. A method of enhancing the nutrient value of distillers solubles, comprising: adding one or more predetermined crude protein and/or amino acid content nutrient sources into the distillers solubles to create a distillation solubles by-product-nutrient source mixture; determining desired nutrient levels of the distillation solubles; and changing at least one of the bypass protein (RUP/UIP) level, amino acid levels in the RUP/UIP and the post ruminal digestibility of the by-product nutrient source mixture to the determined nutrient levels by changing the temperature of the by-product-nutrient source mixture.
  • 67. A method of producing an improved distillers solubles by-product, comprising: establishing target nutritional values for a nutritionally enhanced distillers solubles by-product; determining one or more nutrients and nutrient amounts to be added to the by-product to achieve nutritionally enhanced distillers, brewers or fermenters grain by-product that have at least one of different RUP/UIP, different RUP/UIP amino acid levels, different known crude protein, different total amino acid, different fat, and different fiber mineral and energy levels to achieve a nutritionally enhanced distillers, brewers or fermenters grain by-product than that which meet the established target nutritional values; mixing the determined amounts of one or more nutrients with the distillers solubles to be added; and heating the mixture of distillers solubles and nutrients to achieve a by-product temperature between from about 180° F. to about 250° F. to increase at least one of the bypass protein (RUP/UIP) level, amino acid levels in the RUP/UIP and the post ruminal digestibility of the mixture to meet the established target nutritional values.
  • 68. A system for enhancing the nutrient value of distillers solubles, comprising: an system element to inject one or more predetermined crude protein and/or amino acid level containing nutrient sources into the distillers solubles creating process to create an enhanced by-product-nutrient source mixture; and a heater to apply heat to raise the temperature of and dry the by-product-nutrient source mixture to change the ruminant animal bypass protein of the by-product nutrient source mixture to predetermined levels.
  • 69. A system to produce an improved distillers solubles by-product, comprising: a means to establish target nutritional values for a nutritionally enhanced distillers solubles by-product; a means to determine one or more crude protein and/or amino acid containing nutrients and nutrient amounts to be added to the distillers solubles by-product that have a different RUP/UIP to achieve nutritionally enhanced distillers, brewers, or fermenters grain by-product than will meet the pre-established target nutritional values after processing. a means to mix the determined amounts of nutrients with the distillers solubles; and a means to heat and dry the mixture of distillers solubles and nutrients to achieve a by-product temperature between from about 180° F. to about 250° F. to change the bypass protein (RUP/UIP) level, amino acid levels in the RUP/UIP and the post ruminal digestibility of the mixture to meet the pre established target nutritional values.
  • 70. The method of claim 42 wherein all three of the bypass protein (RUP/UIP) level, amino acid levels in the RUP/UIP and the post ruminal digestibility of the mixture are changed.
  • 71. A method of enhancing the nutrient value of distillers, brewers or fermenters grain byproducts, comprising: adding one or more predetermined crude protein and/or amino acid containing nutrient sources into the wet end of distillation or fermentation byproducts after at least one of fermentation and/or distillation to create a distillation and/or fermentation by-product-nutrient source mixture having an enhanced nutritional value; predetermining a desired level of at least one of bypass protein (RUP/UIP), amino acid level s in the RUP/UIP and the post ruminal digestibility of the nutrient source mixture; and changing at least one of the bypass protein (RUP/UIP) level, amino acid levels in the RUP/UIP and the post ruminal digestibility of the by-product nutrient source mixture to the predetermined level by changing the temperature of the by-product-nutrient source mixture.
  • 72. A method of predictably controlling the amount of the bypass protein (RUP/UIP) level, amino acid levels in the RUP/UIP and the post ruminal digestibility of the mixture to meet the pre established target nutritional values set forth in the last step of claim 55, comprising: maintaining the drying temperature of the mixture at about 218 degrees Fahrenheit until mixture has about a 12% moisture content.
  • 73. A method of enhancing the nutrient value of distillers, brewers or fermenters grain byproducts, comprising: adding one or more predetermined crude protein and/or amino acid containing nutrients into the wet end of distillation or fermentation byproducts after at least one of fermentation and/or distillation to create a distillation and/or fermentation by-product-nutrient source mixture having an enhanced nutritional value; predetermining a bypass protein level, an amino acid level in the RUP/UIP and a post ruminal digestibility level; and changing the bypass protein (RUP/UIP) level, amino acid levels in the RUP/UIP and the post ruminal digestibility of the by-product nutrient source mixture to the predetermined level by changing the temperature of the by-product-nutrient source mixture.
  • 74. A method of enhancing the nutrient value of distillers, brewers or fermenters grain byproducts, comprising: adding one or more predetermined nutrient sources as nutrients into the wet end of distillation or fermentation byproducts after at least one of fermentation and/or distillation to create a distillation and/or fermentation by-product-nutrient source mixture having an enhanced nutritional value; predetermining an amino acid level in the RUP/UIP and a post ruminal digestibility level; and changing the amino acid levels in the RUP/UIP and the post ruminal digestibility of the by-product nutrient source mixture to the predetermined level by changing the temperature of the by-product-nutrient source mixture.
  • 75. A method of enhancing the nutrient value of distillers, brewers or fermenters grain byproducts, comprising: adding one or more predetermined nutrient sources as nutrients into the wet end of distillation or fermentation byproducts after at least one of fermentation and/or distillation to create a distillation and/or fermentation by-product-nutrient source mixture having an enhanced nutritional value; predetermining a bypass protein level and an amino acid level in the RUP/UIP; and changing the bypass protein (RUP/UIP) level and amino acid levels in the RUP/UIP of the by-product nutrient source mixture to the predetermined level(s) by changing the temperature of the by-product-nutrient source mixture.
  • 76. The method of claim 37, wherein the temperature is in a range that causes denaturation of the mixture.
  • 77. The method of claim 42, wherein the temperature is in a range that causes denaturation of the mixture.
  • 78. The system of claim 55, wherein the temperature is in a range that causes denaturation of the mixture.
  • 79. The system of claim 68, wherein the temperature is in a range that causes denaturation of the mixture.
  • 80. A method of producing an improved distillers, brewers or fermenters grain by-product, comprising: establishing desirable nutritional values, including RUP/UIP levels and/or RUP/UIP amino acid levels for a nutritionally enhanced distillers, brewers or fermenters grain by-product; determining nutrients and nutrient amounts to be added to the by-product to achieve one or more nutritionally enhanced distillers, brewers or fermenters grain by-products that have at least one of different RUP/UIP and different RUP/UIP amino acid levels, than the established desirable values thereof; mixing determined amounts of nutrients with wet distillers, brewers or fermenters grain; and heating the mixture of wet distillers grains and nutrients to achieve a by-product temperature between from about 180° F. to about 250° F. to change at least one of the bypass protein (RUP/UIP) level, amino acid levels in the RUP/UIP and the post ruminal digestibility of the mixture to achieve a mixture having the established desirable nutritional values.
  • 81. The method of claim 37, wherein enhanced nutrient(s) comprise the group consisting of: (1) rumen degradable protein in the distillers, brewers and/or fermenters grains; (2) rumen degradable protein in the end by-product; (3) rumen degradable protein in the end by-product; (4) amino acids in the rumen degradable protein and/or in the rumen undegradable protein; (5) ratios of amino acids in the rumen degradable protein and/or in the rumen undegradable protein; (6) post rumen digestibility of the rumen undegradable protein; (7) fat levels in the end product; (8) fiber levels in the end by-product; (9) mineral levels in the end by-product; (10) vitamin levels in the end by-product; (11) pH of the end by-product; and (12) moisture levels in the end by-product.
  • 82. The system of claim 55, wherein enhanced nutrient(s) comprise the group consisting of: (1) rumen degradable protein in the distillers, brewers and/or fermenters grains; (2) rumen degradable protein in the end by-product; (3) rumen degradable protein in the end by-product; (4) amino acids in the rumen degradable protein and/or in the rumen undegradable protein; (5) ratios of amino acids in the rumen degradable protein and/or in the rumen undegradable protein; (6) post rumen digestibility of the rumen undegradable protein; (7) fat levels in the end product; (8) fiber levels in the end by-product; (9) mineral levels in the end by-product; (10) vitamin levels in the end by-product; (11) pH of the end by-product; and (12) moisture levels in the end by-product.
  • 83. The system of claim 69, wherein enhanced nutrient(s) comprise the group consisting of: (1) rumen degradable protein in the distillers, brewers and/or fermenters grains; (2) rumen degradable protein in the end by-product; (3) rumen degradable protein in the end by-product; (4) amino acids in the rumen degradable protein and/or in the rumen undegradable protein; (5) ratios of amino acids in the rumen degradable protein and/or in the rumen undegradable protein; (6) post rumen digestibility of the rumen undegradable protein; (7) fat levels in the end product; (8) fiber levels in the end by-product; (9) mineral levels in the end by-product; (10) vitamin levels in the end by-product; (11) pH of the end by-product; and (12) moisture levels in the end by-product.
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind 371c Date
PCT/US03/28376 9/11/2003 WO 6/14/2005