Patent Grant
10166220
The most widely used dosage forms for oral administration include tablets and capsules. However, such dosage forms have several disadvantages. For example, it is estimated that 50% of the population have problems swallowing tablets (see Seager, 50 J. Pharmacol. and Pharm. 375-382 (1998)). In particular, it is difficult for some elderly persons to swallow tablets or capsules or to medicate children who are unable or unwilling to swallow tablets or capsules. This leads to poor or non-compliance with the treatment, and thus has a negative impact on the efficacy of the treatment.
The bitter taste of many actives also precludes medications from being easily sprinkled onto food, a commonly used method of administering medications to children. Bitter tasting drugs-incorporated into chewable tablets are typically thickly coated mostly with water-insoluble polymers, such as ethylcellulose, to taste mask the drugs through resisting fracturing of the coated drugs during tablet compression and/or during chewing and concomitant leakage of the bitter active. Consequently, substantially complete release of the drug from such chewable tablets in the gastrointestinal tract may take 2 hours or longer. More recently, orally disintegrating tablet (ODT) dosage forms have been introduced, which rapidly dissolve or disintegrate in the buccal cavity, and hence can be taken without water. Other convenient oral dosage forms include sachets and microparticle dispersions. Such medicines are convenient, particularly for the elderly and children.
Fexofenadine hydrochloride is a histamine H1 receptor antagonist, and is approved for the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis and chronic idiopathic urticaria. However, formulating fexofenadine is complicated by its low solubility at low pH (i.e., gastric) conditions. One typical way of addressing low solubility is to formulate the drug in ODT (orally disintegrating tablet) form. However, that approach is complicated by the bitter taste of fexofenadine hydrochloride.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,723,348 describes the preparation of an orodispersable tablet (ODT) containing fexofenadine in the form of fexofenadine granulated with additional excipients, then fluid bed coated with a polymer coating. However, the manufacturing process is relatively complex and requires multiple granulation, coating, and mixing steps.
It is an object of the present invention to provide microencapsulated fexofenadine, by a simple process, in a taste-masked immediate release form.
The present invention provides taste-masked immediate release microcapsules which comprise fexofenadine and a water-insoluble polymer coating and pharmaceutical composition comprising them. Co-granulated fexofenadine microcapsules are also disclosed in the present inventions. These microcapsules and the pharmaceutical compositions comprising them have suitable drug content and desirable pharmaceutical properties, including a quick dissolution rate of fexofenadine combined with a taste masking effect.
The present invention also provides a process for preparing the microcapsule and the co-granulated microcapsules and the pharmaceutical compositions comprising taste-masked immediate release microcapsules which comprise fexofenadine and a water-insoluble polymer coating. The process for microcapsules preparation includes the steps of: (a) dissolving a water-insoluble polymer in an organic solvent; (b) suspending fexofenadine in the organic solvent; (c) applying a coating of the water-insoluble polymer onto the fexofenadine by phase separation; and (d) separating the microcapsules from the organic solvent.
The pharmaceutical compositions of the present invention are useful for the treatment of inflammation-related conditions, such as seasonal allergic rhinitis and chronic idiopathic urticaria. Accordingly, the present invention also provides a method for treating an inflammation-related condition in an individual. The method comprises administering to an individual in need thereof a pharmaceutical composition comprising taste-masked immediate release microcapsules, wherein the microcapsules comprise fexofenadine and a water-insoluble polymer coating.
All documents cited herein are incorporated by reference for all purposes.
As used herein, the term “coating weight” refers to the dry weight of the microcapsule coating divided by the weight of the entire microcapsule, multiplied by 100. For example, a coating weight of 20% means that for the given microcapsule, the coating constitutes 20% of the weight of the microcapsule.
As used herein, the term “average coating weight” refers to the mean value of the coating weight for a population of microcapsules. For example, if half of the microcapsules in a given population have a coating weight of 10% and the other half has a coating weight of 20%, the average coating weight for the given population of microcapsules is 15%.
As used herein, the term “microcapsules” refers to a drug (e.g., fexofenadine or a pharmaceutically salt, ester, and/or solvate thereof, or polymorph thereof) coated with a water-insoluble polymer coating.
As used herein, the term “microencapsulation” refers to a process of coating a drug with the water-insoluble polymer.
As used herein and unless otherwise specified, references to “fexofenadine” or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt, ester, and/or solvate thereof, or polymorph thereof
As used herein, the term “API” means “active pharmaceutical ingredient”, e.g., fexofenadine or a pharmaceutically salt, ester, and/or solvate thereof, or polymorphs thereof.
The present invention provides microcapsules of fexofenadine, a pharmaceutical composition comprising taste-masked immediate release microcapsules which comprise fexofenadine and a water-insoluble polymer coating. Microcapsules of fexofenadine may be in the form of co-granulated microcapsules and may comprise further inactive ingredients and excipients. In one embodiment of the present invention, the fexofenadine is fexofenadine hydrochloride.
The fexofenadine of the present invention may be crystalline or amorphous or combinations thereof. Any fexofenadine crystalline forms are included and can be used in the preparation of microcapsules, microcapsule granulate and co-granulated microcapsules of the present invention.
The water-insoluble polymer of the present invention may be any suitable, pharmaceutically acceptable water-insoluble polymer that forms a coating around the fexofenadine particles, and thereby yields fexofenadine microcapsules exhibiting taste-masked and immediate release properties. Examples of water-insoluble polymers which may be used in the present invention include ethylcellulose, polyvinyl acetate, cellulose acetate, cellulose acetate butyrate, polyvinyl acetate, ammonio-methacrylate copolymers and mixtures thereof. In one embodiment, the water-insoluble polymer of the invention is ethylcellulose.
The amount and type of polymer in the coating contributes toward regulating the release of the fexofenadine, making it possible to modulate the degree of taste masking and/or the fexofenadine release. In the present invention the coating polymer is insoluble in water. The average coating weight of the microcapsules of the present invention is from about 2% to about 40%, including about 5%, about 10%, about 13% 5 about 15%, about 17%, about 18%, about 20%, about 25%, about 30%, about 35%, or about 40%. Typically, the average coating weight of the microcapsules of the present invention is from about 10% to about 20%. More typically, the average coating weight is from about 13% to about 18%. In one embodiment of the present invention, the microcapsules have an average coating weight of about 15%.
The wettability of the water insoluble coating of the microcapsules may be improved by treatment with surfactants. A surfactant layer may be applied to the microcapsules by suspending them in a solution containing the surfactant, or by fluid bed spraying process. The surfactant solution includes at least one surfactant and optionally other ingredients such as glidants or antisticking agents. The surfactant should be soluble in a solvent in which the coating polymer is practically insoluble under the relevant conditions, such as, for example, at room temperature. Suitable surfactants include sodium docusate (DOSS), sodium lauryl sulfate, sucrose fatty acid ester, Tween, Lutrol F68, sorbitan oleate, sorbitan laurate, etc. Other wetting agents may be chosen among: hydroxypropyl cellulose, polyethylene glycol 600, 1000, 3350, and 6000. In one embodiment, the surfactant is in one sense w/w % to about 10 w/w %. Typically, the concentration of surfactant in the solution is between about 0.25 w/w % and about 2 w/w %, or between about 0.5 w/w % and about 1.5 w/w % or between 0.45 and 0.75 w/w %. In one embodiment, the concentration of surfactant in the solution is about 0.45, in another about 0.6 w/w %, in another about 0.75%, in another about 1 w/w %, in still another about 1.5 w/w %. Methods for wetting are also described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,509,034. A particular antisticking agent is silicon dioxide.
If necessary, one or more further protective coating layers (e.g., Opadry Clear, etc.) may be applied onto the microcapsules of the invention.
A further embodiment of the present invention is a granulate of taste-masked fexofenadine microcapsules coated with a water-insoluble polymer.
In the present invention not less than 80% of the fexofenadine taste-masked immediate release microcapsules have a particle size distribution (PSD) below 500 microns; preferably not less than 80% of the microcapsules have a PSD below 355 microns; even preferably, not less than 80% of the microcapsules have a PSD below 250 microns. In a further embodiment not less than 80% of the microcapsules have particle size distribution below 200 microns. The taste masked immediate release microcapsules are also used for the preparation of the taste masked immediate release co-granulated microcapsules.
A further embodiment is a co-granulate of water insoluble coated microcapsules and at least one inactive ingredient. The co-granulates are obtained when the microcapsules are granulated with a portion of at least one inactive ingredient.
Inactive ingredients may be chosen for example from the group consisting of sugar alcohol and saccharides, such as sucrose, xanthan gum, beta-cyclodextrin, xylitol, sorbitol, mannitol, lactose, arabitol, isomalt, glycerol, alginate, microcrystalline cellulose, carboxymethylcellulose or a mixture thereof. Disintegrants in combination with sugar alcohols or saccharides may also be suitable inactive ingredients to be added to the fexofenadine microcapsules or co-granulates.
The microcapsule co-granulate disclosed herein is composed of microcapsules of fexofenadine having a water insoluble coating and at least one inactive ingredient. Particular embodiments of ratios of microcapsule: inactive ingredient(s) are between 1:3 and 1:10, between 1:5 and 1:8, and between 1:6 or 1:7.
The fexofenadine microcapsule co-granulate of the invention has a dissolution release comparable to that of the wetted microcapsules. In one embodiment the particle size of the co-granulate is preferably below 600 μm with a low amount of granules under 125 μm. The reduced amount of fine fraction is relevant as this fraction is almost totally composed of ungranulated microcapsules and the presence of high levels of this fraction could be correlated to a low homogeneity of the co-granulate.
In one embodiment the co-granulate has the following characteristics: ratio 1:7; homogeneity variation <5.0%; fine fraction below 125 μm<5.0%; fraction over 600 μm<10.0%; process yield about 97.0%. Another particular embodiment of the invention is where those co-granulates having the following characteristics: ratio 1:7; homogeneity variation <5.0%; fine fraction below 125 μm<5.0%; fraction over 600 μm<5.0%; process yield about 97.0%.
A further embodiment of the present invention is a blend of fexofenadine microcapsule co-granulate and at least an inactive ingredient granulate. The inactive ingredient granulate comprises one or more inactive ingredients, and may be chosen for example from the group consisting of sugar alcohol and saccharide, such as sucrose, xanthan gum, beta-cyclodextrin, xylitol, sorbitol, mannitol, lactose, arabitol, isomalt, glycerol, alginate, microcrystalline cellulose, carboxymethylcellulose or a mixture thereof. Disintegrants in combination with sugar alcohols or saccharides may also be suitable inactive ingredients to be added to the co-granulates. Preferably the blend (also called bulk mix) has the microcapsule co-granulate and the granulated inactive ingredient(s) in 1:1 ratio. The preferred co-granulate comprises fexofenadine microcapsule, sucrose and xanthan gum, and the granulated inactive ingredient comprises sucrose.
A further embodiment of the present invention is a pharmaceutical composition comprising the fexofenadine taste-masked microcapsules coated with a water insoluble polymer. Said composition comprises fexofenadine microcapsules and further at least one inactive ingredient that may be granulated or ungranulated and/or at least one excipient.
In one embodiment of the invention the pharmaceutical composition of the invention comprises fexofenadine microcapsule co-granulate blended with at least one inactive ingredient that may be granulated or ungranulated. A particular embodiment of the invention is where the pharmaceutical composition has co-granulates of microcapsules and at least one granulated inactive ingredient in 1:1 ratio.
The pharmaceutical compositions of the present invention provide immediate release of the active ingredient, for example, fexofenadine hydrochloride. In one embodiment, the compositions of the present invention release at least about 60% of the fexofenadine hydrochloride within 15 minutes in pH 6.8 JP 2°nd fluid (Japanese Pharmacopeia). In another embodiment, the compositions of the present invention release at least about 65% of the fexofenadine hydrochloride within 15 minutes in pH 6.8 JP 2°nd fluid. In still another embodiment, the compositions of the present invention release at least about 70% of the fexofenadine hydrochloride within 15 minutes in pH 6.8 JP 2°nd fluid. In yet another embodiment, the compositions of the present invention release at least about 75% of the fexofenadine hydrochloride within 15 minutes in pH 6.8 JP 2°nd fluid. In yet another embodiment, the compositions of the present invention release at least about 80% of the fexofenadine hydrochloride within 15 minutes in pH 6.8 JP 2°nd fluid. In yet another embodiment, the compositions of the present invention release at least about 85% of the fexofenadine hydrochloride within 15 minutes in pH 6.8 JP 2°nd fluid. In still embodiment, the compositions of the present invention release at least about 90% of the fexofenadine hydrochloride within 15 minutes in pH 6.8 JP 2°nd fluid. In another embodiment, the compositions of the present invention release at least about 95% of the fexofenadine hydrochloride within 15 minutes in pH 6.8 JP 2°nd fluid.
In another embodiment, the compositions described above may be combined with at least one additional pharmaceutical excipient. Excipients for use in the compositions or dosage forms of the present invention include fillers, diluents, glidants, disintegrants, binders, lubricants etc. Other pharmaceutically acceptable excipients include acidifying agents, alkalizing agents, preservatives, antioxidants, buffering agents, chelating agents, coloring agents, complexing agents, emulsifying and/or solubilizing agents, flavors and perfumes, humectants, sweetening agents, wetting agents etc.
Examples of suitable fillers, diluents and/or binders include, but are not limited to, lactose (e.g., spray-dried lactose, α-lactose, β-lactose, Tabletose®, various grades of Pharmatose®, Microtose® or Fast-Floc®), microcrystalline cellulose (e.g. Avicel PH101, Avicel PH102, Ceolus KG-802, Ceolus KG-1000, Prosolv SMCC 50 or SMCC90, various grades of Elcema®, Vivacel®, Ming Tai® or Solka-Floc®), hydroxypropylcellulose, L-hydroxypropylcellulose (low substituted), hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) (e.g. Methocel E, F and K, Metolose SH of Shin-Etsu, Ltd, such as, e.g., the 4,000 cps grades of Methocel E and Metolose 60 SH, the 4,000 cps grades of Methocel F and Metolose 65 SH, the 4,000, 15,000 and 100,000 cps grades of Methocel K; and the 4,000, 15,000, 39,000 and 100,000 grades of Metolose 90 SH), methylcellulose polymers (such as, e.g., Methocel A, Methocel A4C, Methocel A15C, Methocel A4M), hydroxyethylcellulose, sodium carboxymethylcellulose, carboxymethylhydroxyethylcellulose and other cellulose derivatives, sucrose, xanthan gum, cyclodextrin (e.g., beta-cyclodextrin), agarose, sorbitol, mannitol, dextrins, maltodextrins, starches or modified starches (including potato starch, maize starch and rice starch), calcium phosphate (e.g., basic calcium phosphate, calcium hydrogen phosphate, dicalcium phosphate hydrate), calcium sulfate, calcium carbonate, sodium alginate, collagen etc. or combinations thereof.
Specific examples of diluents include. e.g., calcium carbonate, dibasic calcium phosphate, tribasic calcium phosphate, calcium sulfate, microcrystalline cellulose, powdered cellulose, dextrans, dextrin, dextrose, fructose, kaolin, lactose, mannitol, sorbitol, starch, pregelatinized starch, sucrose, xanthan gum, beta-cyclodextrin, etc. and combinations thereof.
Specific examples of glidants and lubricants include, e.g., silicon dioxide, stearic acid, magnesium stearate, calcium stearate or other metallic stearates, talc, waxes and glycerides, light mineral oil, PEG, glyceryl behenate, colloidal silica, hydrogenated vegetable oils, corn starch, sodium stearyl fumarate, polyethylene glycols, alkyl sulfates, sodium benzoate, sodium acetate etc.
Other excipients include, e.g., flavoring agents, coloring agents, taste-masking agents, pH-adjusting agents, buffering agents, preservatives, stabilizing agents, anti-oxidants, wetting agents, humidity-adjusting agents, surface-active agents, suspending agents, absorption enhancing agents, agents for modified release etc.
Non-limiting examples of flavoring agents include, e.g., cherry, orange, banana, strawberry or other acceptable fruit flavors, or mixtures of cherry, orange, and other acceptable fruit flavors, at up to, for instance, about 3% based on the tablet weight. In addition, the compositions of the present invention is can also include one or more sweeteners such as aspartame, sucralose, or other pharmaceutically acceptable sweeteners, or mixtures of such sweeteners, at up to about 2% by weight, based on the tablet weight. Furthermore, the compositions of the present invention can include one or more FD&C colorants at up to, for instance, 0.5% by weight, based on the tablet weight.
Antioxidants include, e.g., ascorbic acid, ascorbyl palmitate, butylated hydroxyanisole, butylated hydroxytoluene, hypophosphorous acid, monothioglycerol, potassium metabisulfite, propyl gallate, sodium formaldehyde sulfoxylate, sodium metabisulfite, sodium thiosulfate, sulfur dioxide, tocopherol, tocopherol acetate, tocopherol hemisuccinate, TPGS or other tocopherol derivatives, etc.
The fexofenadine microcapsules or the co-granulated microcapsules of the invention may be formulated into a variety of final dosage forms including tablets (e.g., orally disintegrating chewable, dispersible, fast dissolving, effervescent), hard gelatin capsules and sprinkle, suspensions, sachets for permanent or extemporaneous suspensions, and sachets for direct administration in the mouth.
The microcapsules or the co-granulated microcapsules of the invention or mixture thereof may also be formulated into a dry syrup in presence of suitable inactive ingredients and possible further excipients. A dry syrup formulation is a fast dissolving powder that is formulated for ease of swallowing. It may be administered directly in powder form, or first hydrated with a liquid, for example with 3-5 mL of water in a tablespoon or 15-50 mL of water in a glass. Methods of carrying out dry syrup formulations are described in U.S. Publication No. 2008/0064713, herein incorporated by reference for all purposes.
The preferred dry syrup consists of fexofenadine taste masked microcapsule co-granulate in 1:1 ratio to the granulated inactive ingredients; the co-granulate has the following characteristics: microcapsules are in ratio 1:7 to the inactive ingredient; the co-granulates contains sucrose and xanthan gum, the granulated inactive ingredient comprises sucrose. The fexofenadine dry syrup according to the present invention has physico-chemical properties such as particle size, dissolution rate the taste masking that are very little affected by the filling step. This dry syrup has high homogeneity. In one embodiment of the invention the co-granulate has homogeneity variation <5.0%; fine fraction below 125 μm<5.0%; fraction over 600 μm<5.0%; process yield about 97.0%;
The dry syrup is filled into sachet or stick-pack. A sachet is chosen according to the ability to properly dose the product, to the minimum filling weight achievable, to the impact of the mechanical stress on the granulate; to the use of different packaging configuration For flat sachet and the different filling weights any known packaging may be used. Particular filling weights are 300 and 600 mg, they are herein applied in the preparation of very low dosage strengths of the medicament (15 and 30 mg). The final packaging may have different configurations, such as stick pack or flat pack; one example of packaging may consist in five boxes in line linked together with a PE film.
The fexofenadine taste-masked microcapsules of the present invention may be prepared by coacervation, which is an effective technology for producing taste-masked microcapsules. The coacervation process involves salting out macromolecules into liquid-like colloidal droplets rather than solid or gel aggregates. Coacervation may be carried out as described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,252,337, 5,639,475, 6,139,865 and 6,495,160, the entire contents of which are expressly incorporated by reference herein for all purposes.
The microcapsules of the present invention may be prepared by providing a homogeneous solution of a water-insoluble polymer in a suitable solvent in which the active ingredient and, optionally, coating additives are dispersed in suspension. Phase separation may then be employed to cause insolubilization of the water-insoluble polymer, which gels (coacervates) around the active ingredient particles to form the microcapsules. Phase separation may be performed, for example, through variation in temperature or in pH or by adding to the organic solvent a phase-separation inducing agent (i.e., a phase inducer agent) that cause insolubilization of the water-insoluble polymer. Finally, the microcapsules obtained are subjected to hardening, if required, and recovered.
More specifically, the process for preparing taste-masked immediate release particles according to the present invention includes the following steps: (a) dissolving a water-insoluble polymer in an organic solvent; (b) suspending fexofenadine in the organic solvent; (c) applying a coating of the water-insoluble polymer onto the fexofenadine by phase separation; and (d) separating the microcapsules from said organic solvent, for example by filtering, centrifuging; and (e) removing residual organic solvent by drying the microcapsules.
As discussed above, the phase separation step may be carried out by variation in temperature or in pH, or by adding to the organic solvent a phase inducer agent that cause insolubilization of the water-insoluble polymer. In one embodiment, the phase separation step is performed by adding to the organic solvent a phase inducer agent. Suitable phase inducer agents which may be used in the present invention include polyethylene, polyisobutylene, butyl rubber, polybutadiene, isoprene methacrylic polymers, organosilicon polymers such as polydimethyl siloxane, paraffin, etc. In one embodiment, the phase inducer agent is polyethylene.
The organic solvent may be a single organic solvent or it may include a mixture of organic solvents. In accordance with the coacervation process, the organic solvent is chosen so as to dissolve the coating polymer, but not the active ingredient. Suitable organic solvents include cyclohexane or other hydrocarbon solvents. In one embodiment, the organic solvent is cyclohexane.
Non-limiting examples of suitable water-insoluble polymers include ethylcellulose, cellulose acetate, cellulose acetate butyrate, polyvinyl acetate, neutral methacrylic acid-methylmethacrylate copolymers, and mixtures thereof. In one embodiment of the process for preparing taste-masked immediate release particles according to the present invention, the water-insoluble polymer is ethylcellulose, the phase inducer agent is polyethylene, the solvent is cyclohexane and the fexofenadine is fexofenadine hydrochloride.
The taste masked fexofenadine microcapsules co-granulates are prepared by co-granulating the microcapsules (prepared as described above) with an inactive ingredient (eg sugar alcohol and/or saccharide) in form of fine powder in a fluid bed by spraying a binder solution. The process comprises the following steps: 1) microencapsulating of fexofenadine; 2) optional wetting of the microcapsules; 3) adding wetted or unwetted fexofenadine microcapsules to inactive ingredient(s); 4) spraying of the binding solution; 5) drying of the granules; and 6) sieving of the granules.
Granulation may be carried out in a conventional granulator according to conventional techniques. The binder solution is composed of one or more inactive ingredients, preferably is composed of two inactive ingredients; this is particularly suitable to obtain an efficient granulation of the microcapsule with the sucrose. The binder solution is preferably composed of sucrose and xanthan gum. Other inactive ingredients may be chosen from the group consisting of sugars, sugars alcohols, saccharides, sugar/sugar alcohol in combination with disintegrants.
The following parameters are kept under control during this process: the amount of binder solution; the ratio between wet microcapsules and the inactive ingredient(s); the spray rate of the binding solution; the atomization pressure; the air flow. The drying of the granules is performed under the same controlled conditions of inlet air temperature, inlet air flow, etc. The granules are sieved trough a stainless steel net of 840 μm.
The co-granulate is then blended with the inactive ingredient(s) granulate. The final blend comprises the above co-granulate and the inactive ingredient(s) granulate. In a particular embodiment this pharmaceutical composition has the co-granulate and the granulated inactive ingredient(s) in a 1:1 ratio.
Particular inactive ingredient(s) granulate is composed of sucrose. The granulate is obtained by a process comprising the following steps: 1) adding the inactive ingredient(s); 2) spraying of the binding solution; 3) drying of the granules; and 4) sieving and calibrating. During this process the following experimental conditions are controlled: the amount of powder granulated; the spray rate of the solution; the atomization pressure; and the humidity of the in-let air. The air flow is kept constant. All the drying steps are performed in the same conditions (inlet air temperature, inlet air flow, etc.). The granules are sieved trough a stainless steel net of 600 μm or 840 μm. The granules bigger than 840 μm are forced trough a 600 μm screen granulator.
The mixing of the co-granulate, the inactive ingredient(s) granules, together with further ingredients (such as flavour, glidants) is performed under controlled rotation speed for suitable mixing time.
The process of preparation of fexofenadine dry syrup comprises the following different steps: 1) microencapsulating fexofenadine 2) optional wetting of microcapsules; 3) co-granulating of wetted or unwetted microcapsules with at least one inactive ingredient (such as sucrose); 4) separately granulating of inactive ingredient(s) (such as sucrose); 5) mixing of co-granulate of fexofenadine obtained in step 3) together with the granulated inactive ingredient(s) (such as sucrose) obtained in step 4) and with optional further ingredients (such as flavors and silicon dioxide); and 6) filling of fexofenadine dry syrup bulk mixture of step 5) in sachets.
The present invention further provides a method for treating an inflammation-related condition in an individual. The method comprises administering to an individual in need thereof a pharmaceutical composition comprising taste-masked immediate release microcapsules, wherein the microcapsules comprise fexofenadine and a water-insoluble polymer coating. Inflammation-related conditions which may be treated according to the present invention include seasonal allergic rhinitis and chronic idiopathic urticaria.
The dose of fexofenadine hydrochloride to be administered to an individual may vary depending on the age of the individual being treated as well as the indication. Common doses of fexofenadine hydrochloride are 15 mg twice daily, 30 mg twice daily, 60 mg twice daily and 180 mg once daily. Consequently, final dosage forms prepared with the compositions of the present invention may include, for example, 15 mg of fexofenadine hydrochloride, 30 mg of fexofenadine hydrochloride, 60 mg of fexofenadine hydrochloride or 180 mg of fexofenadine hydrochloride.
The following examples are provided for purposes of illustration, and should in no way be construed to limit the present invention.
1.1 Methods and Equipment for Fexofenadine Microcapsules Preparation
Cyclohexane is poured into the microencapsulation reactor. Then, under continuous stirring, fexofenadine HCl, ethylcellulose (EC) and polyethylene are added. The mixture is heated and then cooled down. Microcapsules are recovered, and then washed (one or more times), filtered, and dried over night (about 16 h) in a fume hood or in a hood at 40° C. The powder is sieved through a 300 μm opening sieve.
1removed during washing step
2removed during drying step
Several batches of microcapsules are prepared; the amount of the ethylcellulose coating (% w/w, calculated as microcapsule weight gain) in the final microcapsules is summarized in Table 2.
The microcapsules are characterized by appearance, particle size distribution, residual solvent content and dissolution rate. Microscopic evaluation at the end of the microencapsulation process of the five batches shows appropriate polymer coating deposition around the fexofenadine particles consistent with the amount of the polymer that is used to prepare the different batches (see
As shown in
The particle size distribution (PSD) of microcapsules with a 15% coating is measured (generated from SAMPLE 3). An amount of microcapsules in the range of 25 g-50 g is poured into a 100 mL HDPE bottle, 0.2% (w/w) of Syloid 244 (colloidal silicon dioxide, WR Grace, Columbia, Md.) is sieved through 150 μm screens, added to the microcapsules and manually blended for 2 minutes. The mixture of microcapsules and Syloid 244 is sieved with a digital Octagon apparatus for 10 minutes at amplitude 7. The results are reported in
As shown in Table 3 the assay values of the microcapsules are close to the theoretical values (98-99%).
The amount of residual solvent (cyclohexane) is always below 100 ppm for all microcapsules that are prepared in laboratory scale.
1.2 Industrial Scale Microencapsulation
Fexofenadine microcapsules at different levels of ethylcellulose (15, 18 and 20%) are prepared by the coacervation process in an 80 gallon stainless reactor, and using a fluid bed apparatus for the drying step. Fexofenadine HCl (code 1) and Fexofenadine HCl (code 2)) are used for the preparation of microcapsules. Microcapsules with a 15% ethylcellulose are prepared (Sample 71); the “in vitro” dissolution of SAMPLE 72 and SAMPLE 73 (both are prepared with a different starting fexofenadine (code 2). No significant differences are discerned between the microcapsules that are prepared with different API batches (Mann-Whitney non parametric statistical analysis, p=0.05).
Microcapsules with ethylcellulose levels of 15, 18, and 20% are produced. The microencapsulation trials are carried out by placing the API and the inactive ingredient(s) into the 80 gallon reactor, then adding fresh cyclohexane. The temperature parameters and stirring conditions of the cycle are set as previously described. At the end of the thermal cycle, the paddle rotation is stopped and the product is allowed to settle. The supernatant is removed using a vacuum pump, and fresh solvent is added. The mixture is stirred for short time. Subsequently, the microcapsules are allowed to precipitate again and part of the cyclohexane is removed for a second time. The microcapsules are then filtered in a fluid bed equipped with a 70 μm stainless steel sieve on the bottom under inert nitrogen atmosphere and under-vacuum. After the solvent removal, the microcapsule slurry is dried in the same fluid bed to a residual cyclohexane level below 3000 ppm. The product that is obtained is manually discharged from the fluid bed chamber and sieved through a 840 μm stainless steel sieve.
The dissolution profiles of fexofenadine microcapsules in buffer pH 6.8 2nd fluid JP (ethylcellulose level 15%) are displayed in
1.3 Dissolution Test of Microcapsules
The microcapsule prototypes have improved wettability when a small amount of a surfactant such as DOSS is added to the dissolution media.
Dissolution tests on microcapsules are performed by adding a small amount of surfactants to the dissolution media.
Comparison with dissolution rates of commercial Allegra tablet formulations is carried out using a USP paddle is reported in Table 5.
This comparison indicates that at 15% and 10% ethylcellulose levels, the dissolution of microencapsulated fexofenadine is similar to that of the tablet formulations. Taste evaluation indicates that a 15% coating provides acceptable taste characteristics.
Dissolution values using an official analytical dissolution method using a pH 6.8 buffer (2°nd Fluid for dissolution test, JP15) and assays of the different batches of microcapsules are summarized in tables 6-8.
Microcapsules with a 15% ethylcellulose are prepared (SAMPLE 71) and wetted (by the in-situ process at lab scale, SAMPLE 71/A) and dissolution compared in Table
1.4 Wetted Microcapsules Preparation
The hydrophobic nature of ethylcellulose gives rise to some drawbacks when the microcapsules are used in aqueous environment. When the finished dosage form containing such microcapsules is placed into a glass of water, the hydrophobic microcapsules tend to float and form aggregates (e.g. clumps or cluster) and some tend to attach to the glass wall.
The improved wettability of the microcapsules is achieved by treating the microcapsules with a minimal amount of a surfactant (Wetting Treatment). Several different wetting ingredients are investigated (e.g., sodium lauryl sulfate; sodium docusate; sucrose fatty acid ester; hydroxypropylcellulose and polyethylene glycol 600, 1000, 3350 and 6000, Lutrol F68; etc.).
Wetted treatment of the microcapsules that is performed with surfactants is carried out either by suspending the microcapsules in a surfactant solution, or by spraying the microcapsules with a surfactant solution using for example a fluid bed coating as described below or other suitable equipment.
Wetting Process by Suspension.
The process is carried out by suspending the microcapsules (e.g., SAMPLE 3, 15% average coating weight) in docusate sodium (DOSS) diluted solutions in cyclohexane. The suspension is mixed for about 15 min at 200 rpm, and Syloid 244 is then added to the mixture with stirring. The microcapsules are recovered by filtration using standard equipment. The microcapsules are then dried at room temperature for about 16 hours and sieved using a 300 micron sieve. The DOSS solution that is added to the microcapsules preferably contains more than 0.25% of DOSS. The following lots are prepared: SAMPLE 8 (13% average coating weight), SAMPLE 19-D (15% average coating weight) SAMPLE 9-D (17% average coating weight) and SAMPLE 6-D (20% average coating weight).
Wetting Process by Fluid Bed.
The process is performed using a fluid bed coater that is equipped with a Wurster Insert, and coating microcapsules with a surfactant solution according to standard spraying procedures. The treated microcapsules are then sieved through a 300 micron sieve. SAMPLE 20-D, having 15% average EC weight, is prepared. Wetted microcapsules that are obtained are readily suspendable in aqueous environment without giving rise to significant aggregation and water repellence. Reproducibility of the wetting treatment is checked by dissolution testing. “in vitro” dissolution values, assay and impurity of the batches of microcapsules are checked as is reported in the following part.
Laboratory-Scaled Wetting Treatment
The wetting process is carried out in a top-spray fluid bed apparatus by applying an aqueous solution of sodium docusate and dispersed silicon dioxide. Three different levels of surfactants: 0.45, 0.60 and 0.75%, are applied onto 400 g of microcapsules SAMPLE 78 (15% EC). The results that are obtained are listed in Table 8.
Industrial-Scaled Wetting Treatment.
The wetting treatment is carried out at an industrial scale directly onto an 18 inch fluid bed apparatus, and a series of wetted microcapsules batches SAMPLE 17 and SAMPLE 18 are produced. The wetting dispersion is loaded into the fluid bed using a Watson-Marlow pump equipped with a Marprene© tube. The theoretical composition is reported in Table 9 and the dissolution profiles are showed in Table 10 and
1.5 Analysis and Dissolution Test of Wetted Microcapsules
Assay and impurities are analyzed for different samples
As shown in Table 11 the assay values of the wetted microcapsules are close to the theoretical values (98-99%) and the total level of impurities is lower than 0.1% for all samples tested.
The dissolution of wetted microcapsules is carried out using pH 6.8 JP 2°nd fluid. These results are summarized in Table 12 below and some of them are also presented as a graph in
Samples with average coating weight levels of 13%, 15% and 17% release 80% of the fexofenadine within 15 minutes. The dissolution rate is consistent with the EC level; that is, samples with higher coating levels exhibit a slower dissolution rate, while samples with lower coating levels exhibit a more rapid rate of release. Notably, the batch is treated with a surfactant applied with fluid bed (SAMPLE 20-D) has a faster release rate (80% release within 5 minutes) (see also
Assay of the batches of wetted microcapsules and their “in vitro” dissolution values are summarized in Tables 13-20.
“In vitro” dissolution values are in agreement with amount of ethylcellulose that is applied. Batch to batch variability, among the samples with the same coating level, is significantly reduced due to the improved wettability and dispersion capability of the microcapsules. By comparing dissolution profile of these wetted microcapsules with the corresponding unwetted microcapsules it is shown that these wetted microcapsules in surfactant-free medium exhibit a higher dissolution profile (Tables 21-24).
Wetted microcapsules demonstrate acceptable wettability and dispersibility in all media that are tested, without the need of adding surfactant to the dissolution media buffer.
From the above data it can be evinced that: small taste masked microcapsules (about 200 μm) are easily dispersible in water; moreover, a suitable release profile is achieved.
1.6 Residual Solvent Microcapsules Batch Analysis
The residual cyclohexane on wetted and unwetted microcapsules that are prepared with different coating levels is measured at less than 100 ppm, based on the weight of the microcapsules. Data are summarized in Table 25:
From the above it is clear that residual cyclohexane is within ICH limits, as is reported in the Q3C(R3) guideline.
Fexofenadine microcapsules are formulated with a series of external inactive ingredient(s) and/or excipient(s) to prepare and characterize prototype granulates that: 1) are compatible with the microcapsules; 2) further reduce the bitter taste of fexofenadine; 3) make the microcapsules easier to swallow; 4) make the microcapsules easier to disperse in water; and/or 5) obtain microcapsules which are easily dispersed and suspended in water.
2.1 Inactive Ingredient(s) Selection
The selection of the inactive ingredient(s) is made and binary blends of fexofenadine and the evaluated inactive ingredient(s) are prepared in various drug-to-inactive ingredient(s) ratios and stored at 50° C., wet and dry conditions in hermetically sealed glass vials. At fixed times the chemical stability of the blends is evaluated by HPLC test. Generally the results indicate that the API with the selected inactive ingredient(s) are reasonably stable under standard temperature and humidity conditions.
Different inactive ingredient(s) are also used to evaluate the ability of microcapsules to be dispersed/suspended (20 mL of distilled water, 36 mg of microcapsules), they are reported in Table 26):
Two formulation approaches are carried out: Direct blend of fexofenadine microcapsules with granulated product (excpients) and fluid bed granulation of fexofenadine with part of the sucrose to be further blended with additional granulated sucrose up to final dilution.
2.2 Granulates Preparation and Analysis
Three types of granulates are produced by top-spray fluid bed: 1) a sucrose granulate (SG); 2) a sucrose-xanthan gum granulate (SXG); and 3) a sucrose-β cyclodextrin granulate (SβCD). The fluid bed granulation technique is selected to produce soft granules with a uniform particle size and with the ability to dissolve rapidly in water.
SG is obtained by granulating the sucrose with an aqueous solution of sucrose (5% w/w). The resulting product is dried and the granule fraction between 250-600 μm is selected. The particle size and bulk density (0.5 g/mL) of the resulting granules are characterized (
SXG is prepared by granulating the sucrose first with an aqueous solution of sucrose (5% w/w) and then with aqueous-alcoholic suspension of xanthan gum. The resulting product is dried and the granule fraction between 250-600 μm is selected the particle size, bulk density (0.5 g/mL) and residual ethanol content (<100 ppm) of the resulting granulate are characterized (
SβCD is produced by granulating a powder mixture of sucrose and β-cyclodextrin (2:1 w/w) with an aqueous solution of sucrose (5% w/w). The resulting product is dried and the granule fraction between 250-600 μm is selected. the particle size and bulk density (0.4 g/mL) of the resulting product are evaluated (
The compositions of these three granulates are described in Table 27.
2.3 Preparation of Fexofenadine Microcapsule/Granulates Mixtures
2.3.1 First Set of Examples of Fexofenadine Microcapsule Blended with SGX, SG and SBCD Granulates)
The samples are prepared using fexofenadine HCl microcapsules at three different average EC weight levels (13%, 17% and 20%). All samples contain a co-granule of xanthan gum and sucrose (400 mg). In addition to these materials, each sample contains a quantity of sucrose granules (150 mg) either alone or in combination with an additional inactive ingredient(s), such as, for example, β-cyclodextrin (Beta CDX). The only exception to this is SAMPLE 39, which did not contain any additional sucrose granules.
Additional excipients are added in SAMPLE 30, SAMPLE 31, SAMPLE 32, SAMPLE 33 and SAMPLE 34. Flavorings are added to SAMPLE 30 and SAMPLE 31, while β-cyclodextrin (BCD) is added to SAMPLE 32, SAMPLE 33 and SAMPLE 34.
A placebo sample is also prepared (SAMPLE 35). It contains microencapsulated talc instead of fexofenadine HCl. Table 28, below, summarizes the qualitative and quantitative compositions of the batches.
Homogeneity of dispersion of the resulting granules are characterized before and after agitation/stirring in 20 mL of water.
Additionally, criteria such as sedimentation/settling/floating, re-suspension ability, residual after pouring, and dissolution at pH 6.8 JP, 1 mM HCl (pH 3.0) and distilled water of the fexofenadine microcapsule/granulate mixture are evaluated as well.
The wettability and dispersion test is performed in 50 mL glass beaker with 20 mL of de-mineralized water at room temperature (20-25° C.). Specifically, an amount of microcapsules corresponding to 30 mg of fexofenadine HCl and the selected inactive ingredient(s) is weighed and poured into the beaker. The mixture is gently stirred for 10 seconds and the tendency to form agglomerates, floating, settling, sinking is observed for 30 seconds. Finally, the suspension is stirred again for 2 seconds and poured out, and any residue in the beaker is evaluated. Finally the mouth feel and taste masking characteristics of the fexofenadine microcapsule/granulate mixture is evaluated by administering the powder into the mouth or on a tablespoon with few milliliters of water. The maximum amount of external inactive ingredient(s) and/or excipients that is added to these batches of fexofenadine microcapsules (≅36 mg) is 550 mg.
2.3.1.1 Dissolution of Fexofenadine Microcapsules/Granulates Mixtures
A series of tests are carried out using fexofenadine microcapsules coated with an amount of ethylcellulose ranging from 13% to 20%, and blended with the three different types of granules, as described above in Table 28. The wettability/dispersion trials show that the combination of granulates with the fexofenadine microcapsules did not have a negative impact on their wettability and dispersion in water. Furthermore, good dispersability is shown for the formulations using a limited amount of liquid (tablespoon).
SAMPLE 35 is a placebo prepared with microcapsules of talc instead of fexofenadine HCl. SAMPLE 34 has the same composition as SAMPLE 32, and is prepared to confirm the taste masking capability of the microcapsules with the lowest coating level. All the prototypes are prepared with granules of SXG. The SβCD granulate is used in some samples (SAMPLE 32, SAMPLE 33, SAMPLE 34) to evaluate the influence of this inactive ingredient(s) on the reduction of bitterness. SAMPLE 39 is prepared with a reduced level of inactive ingredient(s) to evaluate the effects of inactive ingredient(s) level on mouth feel. Flavored prototypes SAMPLE 30 and SAMPLE 31 are also evaluated. The dissolution profiles of the samples are reported in the following tables and Figures.
Taste masking tests indicated that all samples generate an immediate sweet sensation, followed by a slight bitterness (after 20-30 sec). However this bitter taste is not recognized as unpleasant.
The results of the dissolution of fexofenadine microcapsules/granulates mixtures with a 13%, 17%, 20% of polymer is carried out using pH 6.8 JP 2°nd fluid are summarized in Table 29-31 and also presented as a graph in
The dissolution characteristics of the products are similar to that of the microcapsules with a small increase in dissolution rate recorded overall.
The dissolution characteristics of the formulated products are similar to that of the microcapsules with a small increase in dissolution rate recorded overall.
The dissolution of formulated product containing microcapsules with an average EC weight of 20% is carried out using pH 6.8 JP 2°nd fluid. These results are compared to unformulated microcapsules. These results are summarized in Table 31 below and also are presented as a graph in
For each coating level, the dissolution rate of the formulated microcapsule prototypes is similar to the dissolution rate of microcapsules alone (see
The dissolution rate for formulated product batches is also carried out using microcapsules with 13% and 17% coatings and tested with 1 mM HCl; and DI water. The results are reported in the hereunder Tables which also include the values for dissolution in pH 6.8 JP 2°nd fluid as reported above, and are represented graphically in
Dissolution rates of sachet prototype SAMPLE 33, containing microcapsule SAMPLE 9-D (17% average ethylcellulose weight) are reported below in Table 35.
The dissolution rates of the formulated prototypes are similar to the dissolution profile of the corresponding microcapsules. The inactive ingredient(s) that is used do not appear to affect the dissolution profile of the microcapsules.
2.3.2 Second Set of Examples of Formulated Fexofenadine Microcapsules Blended with SC and SGX Granulates)
A second series of fexofenadine products is prepared (Table 36). These compositions are prepared based on the following criteria: 1) prototypes are formulated using microcapsules with 13% or 15% coating; 2) β-cyclodextrin is not used; 3) a unique amount of flavour, banana or strawberry, is used for all the prototypes; 4) the flavour is introduced in the formulation mixed with the SG granulate and with a small amount of silicon dioxide.
Fexofenadine is released with a fast mechanism (i.e., >80% release at 15 min.) (Table 37).
2.3.3 Third Set of Examples of Formulated Fexofenadine Microcapsules Blended with SGX Granulates
Additional prototypes are prepared as follows. Fexofenadine microcapsules are combined with SGX granules, and the amount of xanthan gum is reduced from 1.5 to 1.1% w/w in the SGX granulate so that the concentration of the xanthan gum remains equal to 1.0% w/w.
2.4 Preparation of Examples of Fexofenadine Granules
2.4.1 First Set Granulation Fexofenadine Microcaps with Sucrose and Xanthan Gum
One part of fexofenadine microcapsules (15% by weight of Ethylcellulose) is granulated together with 6 parts of sucrose powder into a fluid bed fitted with a top spray (Glatt GPCG3). The binding solution that is consisted of an aqueous solution of sucrose (15% w/w) and xanthan gum (0.5% w/w) is sprayed at room temperature. At the end of the granulation process the granules are dried, then the dried granules are removed from the fluid bed and sieved. The granules are characterized for particle size distribution (vibrating sieve test), release profile of fexofenadine (dissolution test in USP apparatus II, using 900 mL of pH 6.8 buffer, Japan 2nd, at 37° C. and paddle speed of 50 rpm), active ingredient content uniformity and appearance (optical microscopy test).
Content uniformity tests show that fexofenadine microcapsules are homogeneously distributed into granules: measured average content (n=15) and relevant % RSD are respectively 111 mg/g (theoretical adjusted according microcapsules assay: 114 mg/g) and 3.2%. Optical microscopy appears to show that the granulation process results in the embedding of microcapsules in sucrose granules or the adhesion of microcapsules onto sucrose granules.
2.4.2 Second Set of Examples of Granulation Fexofenadine Microcaps with Sucrose and Xanthan Gum
One part of fexofenadine microcapsules (15% by weight of ethylcellulose) is granulated together with 14 parts of sucrose powder into fluid bed fitted with top spray (Glatt GPCG3). The binding solution that is consisted of an aqueous solution of sucrose (15% w/w) and xanthan gum (0.5% w/w) is sprayed at room temperature. At the end of the granulation process the granules are dried then the dried granules are removed from the fluid bed and sieved.
The granules that are collected are characterized for particle size distribution (vibrating sieve test), the release profile of fexofenadine (dissolution test in USP apparatus II, using 900 mL of pH 6.8 buffer, Japan 2nd, at 37° C. and paddle speed of 50 rpm), active ingredient content uniformity and appearance (optical microscopy test).
Content uniformity tests appear to show that the granules are homogeneously distributed: average content and % RSD respectively 53.5 mg/g (theoretical value adjusted according microcapsules assay: 54.5 mg/g) and 2.8%.
Granules appearance (optical microscopy) is close to that of granules prepared in the first set using the same batch of microcapsules.
Granulation success is confirmed also by size distribution data (vibrating sieve test): aggregation of sucrose and microcapsules lead to significant particle size increase (Table 41). Moreover granules size distribution is comparable with that of the granules produced in the first set (microcapsules/sucrose weight ratio 1:6)
2.4.3 Third Set of Examples of Granulation Fexofenadine Microcaps with Sucrose and Xanthan Gum
A homogenous final mixture is obtained by granulating fexofenadine microcapsules with a portion of the excipients, then subsequently blended with the remaining inactive ingredients in a granulated form. Mixtures with similar particle sizes are mixed in a 1:1 w/w ratio. This co-granulation process is carried out in a lab-scale top-spray fluid bed (GPCG 3, 7 inches). Microcapsules are combined in ratio of 1:6 w/w with sucrose and granulated using a binder solution of sucrose aqueous solution (5% w/w) containing 0.5% w/w of xanthan gum.
One batch of granulates, SAMPLE 45, is made by combining microcapsules in a ratio of 1:6 w/w with sucrose using a binder solution of sucrose aqueous solution (5% w/w) in absence of xanthan gum. The addition of the xanthan gum and the concurrent increase of the amount of sucrose in the binder solution improves the process of the co-granulation of microcapsules with sucrose. Table 43 lists the PSD of the resulting granulates. and drug assay as f(PSD):
The theoretical assay value is always about 100 mg/g for all the manufactured granulates. Microscopic observation shows that the fine fraction (<125 micron) is richer in microcapsules when compared with the larger fractions.
“In vitro” dissolution values are given hereunder for some of the manufactured granulates
In order to control the fraction of small particles the granulation process parameters and the amount of binder solution may be adjusted.
The graph displayed in
2.4.4 Fourth Set of Examples of Granulation Fexofenadine Microcaps with Sucrose and Xanthan Gum. Industrial Scale
The wetted microcapsules are co-granulated with the sucrose fine powder using the same binder solution used during the lab-scale studies. In particular, 14.70 kg of wet microcapsules are granulated with 102.90 kg of sucrose fine powder (ratio 1:7), using 29.40 kg of binder solution. The obtained granulate is sieved through a 840 μm stainless steel sieve. The sieved product is placed in a double PE bag in plastic drums.
The obtained co-granulate is characterized in terms of PSD, drug assay as f(PSD), water content (0.13%) and “in vitro” dissolution values in pH 6.8 2nd fluid JP. Data are reported in the following tables.
The amount of the fine particles is low. The RSD is between 1.8% and 6.0%,
2.4.5 Preparation of Sucrose and Xanthan Granulates
Sucrose granules with a PSD similar to that which is obtained with the co-granulate are prepared. This scale up process is performed directly onto the industrial top-spray fluid bed Glatt FB500, 500 L. The process is carried out in a single step: the xanthan gum is directly granulated with the sucrose by spraying the same binder solution used for the co-granulation process, however the ethanol is eliminated.
In particular, 147.0 kg of sucrose fine powder and 3.0 kg of xanthan gum are granulated with 20.0 kg of binder solution. At the end of the granulation process the product is sieved through a 840 μm stainless steel sieve and 149.1 kg of granulate is obtained (process yield 97.4%).
The PSD and water content (0.48%) of the resulting granulates are characterized.
The two granulates are prepared applying the same process parameters and resulted in compositions with similar PSD compared to the co-granulate (this is an important requirement in order to confirm that the subsequent mixing step can be successfully carried out).
2.5 Blending of Fexofenadine Granules and Sucrose Granules
The two previous batches of co-granulates and sucrose granulates are mixed with two batches of sugar-based placebo granules having a very similar PSD, at a 1:1 w/w ratio with batch sizes of about 200 kg. The combination of SAMPLE 51 and placebo SAMPLE 55 is designated as SAMPLE 56 after mixing.
The tables below describe the composition of the batches.
The blend homogeneity (n=10) of mixture SAMPLE 57 is: first assay: 50.5 mg/g (RSD 5.1%); second assay: 50.7 mg/g (RSD 5.5%). The performed trials indicate that the average assay is close to the theoretical value (50 mg/g).
The dissolution performance of fexofenadine bulk mix (SAMPLE 57) in buffer pH 6.8 2nd fluid JP (compared with the respective co-granulate (SAMPLE 52) (n=6)) and in pH 3.0 are reported below
The mixing process shows a slight increase in the dissolution rate during the first five minutes, this effect could be possibly related to a mechanical stress that is involved during the mix.
The dissolution data for SAMPLE 57 confirm the fast release.
2.6 Sachet Filling
Strength 15 mg are produced corresponding to 300 mg of mixture. The filling machine produces 2 sachets in line (7.0 mm×5.8 mm) The maximum productivity is 170 sachets/min (speed 85 rpm). The material that is used for the preparation of the sachets is 3LAMINET/M AL12960 (PET 12 μm, Aluminium 9 μm, antistatic PE 60 μm).
A feeding screw is present between the bag and the feeding hopper along with a sensor to detect the quantity of powder in order to keep the amount of mixture in the hopper consistent (when the volume of the mixture is decreased, the screw feeds the hopper). The hopper is bipartite having a left and right filling system, each side is equipped with a single dosing screw. Inside there are two stirring systems (left and right) that maintain the mix under gentle agitation during the process.
Sachet filling trials are carried out starting from a mixture that is prepared with a co-granulate with different levels of fine particles and PSD In some cases the theoretical assay value of the mixture is lower and therefore the target strength of each drug content can be variable.
Sachet SAMPLE 58 is produced by using the bulk mix SAMPLE 57 (50.0 mg/g RSD 5.6%). The PSD of the bulk mix SAMPLE 57 is given in Table 51. Parameters of the machine are set as given in the Table below
The results indicate that 300 mg sachet having mass variation between 6.3 and 7.8 and content uniformity between 6.5 and 8.0 are be obtained with the fexofenadine microcapsule co-granulate of the invention.
2.6.2 Sachet Filling with Mixture SAMPLE 57 >125 μm
Bulk mixture SAMPLE 57 >125 micron is prepared from SAMPLE 57 by removing the fine fraction (<125 micron); this is performed by sieving. The PSD data of the mixture is reported in Table 59
Sachet filling trials are carried out on the 15 mg dose sachet using this bulk mixture. The batch number of sachets SAMPLE 79 is obtained. The following Table summarizes the results:
Good results in term of filling weight are obtained and moreover the assay of the sachet is practically equal to the theoretical value (13.8 mg/g); no segregation phenomena occurs.
2.6.3 Sachet Filling with Mixture SAMPLE 56
Trials are carried out on the 15 mg dose sachet using the bulk mixture SAMPLE 56. The PSD of the bulk mix is reported in Table 61.
The assay is coherent with the filling weight, always over the theoretical of 300 mg; there is a total absence of segregation phenomena, the assay remains very consistent during all the production and mainly its variability.
2.6.4 Sachet Filling with Industrial Scale Equipment
Further trials are performed using industrial scale equipment; the batch sizes involved are in the range of hundreds kilos for the final bulk mixture and in the order of hundreds of thousands of dosage units.
The fexofenadine co-granulates are prepared starting from wetted microcapsules. Examples of particles size distribution of wetted microcapsules are reported in table 62.
The co-granulates are prepared and mixed with granulated ingredients; the three batches that are obtained have the same composition as the batches of Table 51. Trials are carried out on these three batches.
The following table shows data related to Particle Size Distribution, of the mixtures and the Assay and corresponding Standard Deviation of the sachets produced for the 3 batches:
Each batch of mixture is used to prepare two batches of sachets, one for each forecasted dosage strength: 15 and 30 mg, where the 30 mg corresponds to 600 mg of filling weight and the 15 mg to the 300 mg.
In detail, each batch of mixture gives rise to the following batches of sachets:
Mixture sample 59Sachets 62 (300 mg) and 63 (600 mg)
Mixture sample 60Sachets 64 (300 mg) and 65 (600 mg)
Mixture sample 61Sachets 66 (300 mg) and 67 (600 mg)
The following table shows the experimental values of Assay for each produced batch of sachets:
Furthermore, sachets containing 600 mg of dry syrup is analysed also in terms of “in vitro” dissolution rate, the dissolution test is carried out at pH=3.0 using n=12 samples. The following table reports the data expressed for % released after 15 minutes, Standard Deviation and Relative Standard Deviation:
From the above it can be evinced that additional filling weights (600 and 300 mg per unit) and additional dosage strengths (15 mg and 30 mg of fexofenadine HCl per unit) of sachets containing the dry syrup are successfully manufactured.
It will be appreciated that, although specific embodiments of the invention are described herein for purposes of illustration, various modifications may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
The present application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/049,818 filed on Oct. 9, 2013, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/959,113 filed on Dec. 2, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,580,313, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/265,823 filed Dec. 2, 2009, and U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/354,575 filed Jun. 14, 2010, each of which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety for all purposes.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3184386 | Stephenson | May 1965 | A |
| 3558768 | Klippel | Jan 1971 | A |
| 3885026 | Heinemann et al. | May 1975 | A |
| 4078051 | Pomot et al. | Mar 1978 | A |
| 4138475 | McAinsh et al. | Feb 1979 | A |
| 4248857 | DeNeale et al. | Feb 1981 | A |
| 4292017 | Doepel | Sep 1981 | A |
| 4305502 | Gregory et al. | Dec 1981 | A |
| 4369172 | Schor et al. | Jan 1983 | A |
| 4371516 | Gregory et al. | Feb 1983 | A |
| 4389330 | Tice et al. | Jun 1983 | A |
| 4389393 | Schor et al. | Jun 1983 | A |
| 4542042 | Samejima | Sep 1985 | A |
| 4556678 | Hsiao | Dec 1985 | A |
| 4587118 | Hsiao | May 1986 | A |
| 4628098 | Nohara et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
| 4661647 | Serpelloni et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
| 4670459 | Sjoerdsma | Jun 1987 | A |
| 4689333 | Nohara et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
| 4698101 | Koivurinta | Oct 1987 | A |
| 4708867 | Hsiao | Nov 1987 | A |
| 4713248 | Kjornaes et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
| 4716041 | Kjornaes et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
| 4728512 | Mehta et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
| 4743248 | Bartoo et al. | May 1988 | A |
| 4752470 | Mehta | Jun 1988 | A |
| 4757090 | Salpekar et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
| 4760093 | Blank et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
| 4780318 | Appelgren et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
| 4786508 | Ghebre-Sellassie et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
| 4800087 | Mehta | Jan 1989 | A |
| 4803213 | Iida et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
| 4824675 | Wong et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
| 4832880 | Staniforth | May 1989 | A |
| 4840799 | Appelgren et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
| 4851226 | Julian et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
| 4851229 | Magruder et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
| 4863742 | Panoz et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
| 4871549 | Ueda et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
| 4874613 | Hsiao | Oct 1989 | A |
| 4886669 | Ventouras | Dec 1989 | A |
| 4892741 | Ohm et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
| 4894240 | Geoghegan et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
| 4898737 | Panoz et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
| 4915949 | Wong et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
| 4938968 | Mehta | Jul 1990 | A |
| 4946684 | Blank et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
| 4957745 | Jonsson et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
| 4968508 | Oren et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
| 4971805 | Kitanishi et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
| 4983401 | Eichel et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
| 5006345 | Lang | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5011692 | Fujioka et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5013557 | Tai | May 1991 | A |
| 5013743 | Iwahi et al. | May 1991 | A |
| 5017122 | Staniforth | May 1991 | A |
| 5017381 | Maruyama et al. | May 1991 | A |
| 5026559 | Eichel et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5026560 | Makino et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5039540 | Ecanow | Aug 1991 | A |
| 5045321 | Makino et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
| 5073374 | McCarty | Dec 1991 | A |
| 5075114 | Roche | Dec 1991 | A |
| 5079018 | Ecanow | Jan 1992 | A |
| 5082669 | Shirai et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
| 5084278 | Mehta | Jan 1992 | A |
| 5093132 | Makino et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5104648 | Denton et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
| 5112616 | McCarty | May 1992 | A |
| 5133974 | Paradissis et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5137733 | Noda et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5149542 | Valducci | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5160680 | Serpelloni et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
| 5169640 | France et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5178878 | Wehling et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5204121 | Bucheler et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
| 5211957 | Hagemann et al. | May 1993 | A |
| 5213808 | Bar-Shalom et al. | May 1993 | A |
| 5229131 | Amidon et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
| 5229135 | Philippon et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
| 5238686 | Eichel et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5252337 | Powell | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5256699 | Murphy et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5260068 | Chen | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5260069 | Chen | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5275827 | Spinelli et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5376384 | Eichel et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5409711 | Mapelli et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5433959 | Makino et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5439689 | Hendrickson et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5445829 | Paradissis et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5464632 | Cousin et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5466464 | Masaki et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5470584 | Hendrickson et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5472708 | Chen | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5478573 | Eichel et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5489436 | Hoy et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
| 5501861 | Makino et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5506345 | Riley et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5508040 | Chen | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5529790 | Eichel et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5536507 | Abramowitz et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5543099 | Zhang et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5567441 | Chen | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5576014 | Mizumoto et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5609883 | Valentine et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5612059 | Cardinal et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5616345 | Geoghegan et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5629017 | Pozzi et al. | May 1997 | A |
| 5639475 | Bettman | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5643630 | Hinzpeter et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5700492 | Morimoto et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5720974 | Makino et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5738875 | Yarwood et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5747068 | Mendizabal | May 1998 | A |
| 5762961 | Roser et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5788987 | Busetti et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5807577 | Ouali | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5837284 | Mehta et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5837285 | Nakamichi et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5837379 | Chen et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5840329 | Bai | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5876759 | Gowan, Jr. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5891474 | Busetti et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5900252 | Calanchi et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5908638 | Huber et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5968554 | Beiman et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 6024981 | Khankari et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6024982 | Oshlack et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6033687 | Heinicke et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6039979 | Gendrot et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6096340 | Chen et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6099859 | Cheng et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6099863 | Gilis et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6099865 | Augello et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6103263 | Lee et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6106861 | Chaveau et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6106862 | Chen et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6123962 | Makino et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6129933 | Oshlack et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6136345 | Grimmett et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6139865 | Friend et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6139877 | Debregeas et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6153220 | Cumming et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6162463 | Lippa | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6169105 | Wong et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6183776 | Depui et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6190692 | Busetti et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6221392 | Khankari et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6221402 | Itoh et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6228398 | Devane et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6269615 | Amborn et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6287599 | Burnside et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6316029 | Jain et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6328994 | Shimizu et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6344215 | Bettman et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6350470 | Pather et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6350471 | Seth | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6365182 | Khankari et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6368625 | Siebert et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6368628 | Seth | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6372253 | Daggy et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6391335 | Pather et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6413549 | Green et al. | Jul 2002 | B2 |
| 6420473 | Chittamuru et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6432534 | Hayakawa et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6465009 | Liu et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6465010 | Lagoviyer et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6495160 | Esposito et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
| 6500454 | Percel et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6509034 | Calanchi et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6509036 | Pather et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
| 6531152 | Lerner et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6551617 | Corbo et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6569463 | Patel et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
| 6579535 | Valentine et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
| 6596311 | Dobetti | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6602521 | Ting et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6627223 | Percel et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| 6641838 | Pather et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6660382 | Nouri et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6663888 | Percel et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6663893 | Corbo et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6723348 | Faham et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6740341 | Holt et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
| 6897205 | Beckert et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 7048945 | Percel et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 8580313 | Mapelli et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 9233105 | Mapelli et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
| 20010007680 | Kolter et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
| 20010014340 | Ohta et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
| 20010046964 | Percel et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20020054907 | Devane et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020077348 | Dean et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020142034 | Shimizu et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020187190 | Cade et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030064108 | Lukas et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030096791 | Gupte et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030113374 | Percel et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030134884 | Hazama et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030157173 | Percel et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030161888 | Fernandez et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030170310 | Wadhwa | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030215500 | Ohta et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20040047906 | Percel et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040121010 | Hirsh et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040122106 | Ohta et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040126427 | Venkatesh et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040131682 | Percel et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040137156 | Lee et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040242536 | Khoo et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050025824 | Percel et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050118268 | Percel et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050152974 | Boehm et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050232988 | Venkatesh et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050256163 | Kor | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050269722 | De Luigi Bruschi et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050288328 | Weiner et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060024361 | Odidi et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060057199 | Venkatesh et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060078614 | Venkatesh et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060105038 | Lai et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060105039 | Lai et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060246134 | Venkatesh | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060269607 | Percel et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20070048373 | Chastain et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20090263480 | Lai et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20110250281 | Mapelli et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20140141091 | Mapelli et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 142-1996 | Jan 1996 | CL |
| 3674-2008 | Dec 2008 | CL |
| 330-2009 | Feb 2009 | CL |
| 0052492 | Feb 1984 | EP |
| 0166440 | Jan 1986 | EP |
| 0239361 | Sep 1987 | EP |
| 0349103 | Jan 1990 | EP |
| 0357369 | Mar 1990 | EP |
| 0391518 | Oct 1990 | EP |
| 0431877 | Jun 1991 | EP |
| 0453001 | Oct 1991 | EP |
| 0516345 | Dec 1992 | EP |
| 0538034 | Apr 1993 | EP |
| 0553777 | Aug 1993 | EP |
| 0650826 | May 1995 | EP |
| 0721777 | Jul 1996 | EP |
| 0815931 | Jan 1998 | EP |
| 0294493 | Dec 1998 | EP |
| 0914818 | May 1999 | EP |
| 0914823 | May 1999 | EP |
| 1010423 | Jun 2000 | EP |
| 0582396 | Jan 2001 | EP |
| 1070497 | Jan 2001 | EP |
| 1072257 | Jan 2001 | EP |
| 1157690 | Nov 2001 | EP |
| 1219291 | Jul 2002 | EP |
| 1156786 | Mar 2003 | EP |
| 1366759 | Dec 2003 | EP |
| 0914823 | Dec 2004 | EP |
| 1491184 | Dec 2004 | EP |
| 2319498 | May 2011 | EP |
| 2679451 | Jan 1993 | FR |
| 2766089 | Jan 1999 | FR |
| 2778848 | May 2011 | FR |
| 2053787 | Feb 1981 | GB |
| 8824392.8 | Sep 1989 | GB |
| 2224207 | May 1990 | GB |
| 41-11273 | Jun 1966 | JP |
| 49-69819 | Jul 1974 | JP |
| 55-129224 | Oct 1980 | JP |
| 56-014098 | Oct 1981 | JP |
| 61-143316 | Jul 1986 | JP |
| 62-50445 | Oct 1987 | JP |
| 62-242616 | Oct 1987 | JP |
| 62-246513 | Oct 1987 | JP |
| 62-252723 | Nov 1987 | JP |
| 63-162619 | Jul 1988 | JP |
| 63-270624 | Nov 1988 | JP |
| 1-503385 | Nov 1989 | JP |
| 1-313420 | Dec 1989 | JP |
| 2-500747 | Mar 1990 | JP |
| 2-164824 | Jun 1990 | JP |
| 2-172918 | Jul 1990 | JP |
| 2-289512 | Nov 1990 | JP |
| 3-240724 | Oct 1991 | JP |
| 4-224517 | Aug 1992 | JP |
| 5-271054 | Oct 1993 | JP |
| 5-310558 | Nov 1993 | JP |
| 6-53658 | Jul 1994 | JP |
| 6-321790 | Nov 1994 | JP |
| 7-69889 | Mar 1995 | JP |
| 7-124231 | May 1995 | JP |
| 8-503482 | Apr 1996 | JP |
| 8-175978 | Jul 1996 | JP |
| 550608 | Nov 2005 | NZ |
| 554346 | May 2006 | NZ |
| WO 1988008703 | Nov 1988 | WO |
| WO 1988008704 | Nov 1988 | WO |
| WO 1992010173 | Jun 1992 | WO |
| WO 1993000097 | Jan 1993 | WO |
| WO 1993012769 | Jul 1993 | WO |
| WO 1993013758 | Jul 1993 | WO |
| WO 1993015724 | Aug 1993 | WO |
| WO 1994008576 | Apr 1994 | WO |
| WO 1994012180 | Jun 1994 | WO |
| WO 1997041878 | Nov 1997 | WO |
| WO 1997047287 | Dec 1997 | WO |
| WO 1999004763 | Feb 1999 | WO |
| WO 1999052510 | Oct 1999 | WO |
| WO 2000025752 | May 2000 | WO |
| WO 2000033821 | Jun 2000 | WO |
| WO 2000042998 | Jul 2000 | WO |
| WO 2000051568 | Sep 2000 | WO |
| WO 2000059486 | Oct 2000 | WO |
| WO 2001013898 | Mar 2001 | WO |
| WO 2001072285 | Oct 2001 | WO |
| WO 2001080829 | Nov 2001 | WO |
| WO 2002013794 | Feb 2002 | WO |
| WO 2002043704 | Jun 2002 | WO |
| WO 2002057475 | Jul 2002 | WO |
| WO 2002085336 | Oct 2002 | WO |
| WO 2003013492 | Feb 2003 | WO |
| WO 2003039520 | Mar 2003 | WO |
| WO 2003026613 | Apr 2003 | WO |
| WO 2003041683 | May 2003 | WO |
| WO 2003043661 | May 2003 | WO |
| WO 2003047552 | Jun 2003 | WO |
| WO 2004009058 | Jan 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004022037 | Mar 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004087111 | Oct 2004 | WO |
| WO 2005097064 | Oct 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005105049 | Nov 2005 | WO |
| WO 2008014175 | Jan 2008 | WO |
| WO 2011067667 | Jun 2011 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Ansel et al. (Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms and Drug Delivery Systems, 1999, 7th Ed. pp. 175-176, 209-211). 6 pages. |
| Yaffe et al. (Antihistamines in Topical Preparations; Pediatrics. 1973;51:299-301; 5 pages) (Year: 1973). |
| Simons et al. (WAO Journal 2008;145-155). (Year: 2008). |
| “Low Substituted Hydroxypropylcellulose,” Official Monographs for Part II, 2001, NRF, JP XIV, pp. 942-943. |
| Albrecht, “International Search Report,” 6 pages, from International Patent Appl. No. PCT/US02/31535, European Patent Office (dated Feb. 3, 2003). |
| Anwar et al., “Chronotherapeutics for Cardiovascular Disease,” Drugs 55(5):631-643 (1998). |
| Bauer et al., Pharmarzeutische Technologie, 5th Edition, 1997, Govi Verlag Frankfurt, pp. 164-166 (English translation). |
| Berigan, “Atomoxetine Used Adjunctively With Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors to Treat Depression,” Prim. Care. Companion J. Clin. Psychiatry 6(2):93-94 (2004). |
| Berringer, P. et al. “The Science and Practice of Pharmacy,” Remington, 21st Edition, 2005, pp. 896-903. |
| Bodmeier et al., “Theophylline Tablets Coated with Aqueous Latexes Containing Dispersed Pore Formers,” J. Pharm. Sci. 79(10):925-928 (1990). |
| Database WPI, Section Ch, Week 198748, Derwent Publications, Ltd., London, GB; Class A96; AN 1987-338131, XP002156870. |
| Fell, Letter to the Editor, J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 1968, vol. 20, pp. 657-658. |
| FMC Corporation Product Specification for Avicel PH, 2005. |
| Foreign non-patent publication from Japanese textbook, 1989, Hirokawa Publishing Co. (English translation). |
| Foreign non-patent publication Sysmex No. FP30SCJ001 (English translation). |
| Gordon et al., “Effect of the Mode of Super Disintegrant Incoproration on Dissolution in Wet Granulated Tables,” J. Pharm. Sci. 82:220-226 (1993). |
| Gorman et al., An Evaluation of Croscarmellose as a Tablet Disintegrant in Direct Compression Systems, Drug. Dev. Ind. Pharm. 1982; vol. 8, pp. 397-410. |
| Handbook (Binran) of Granule, vol. 1, Ohmsha Ltd., p. 434 & 438 (May 3, 1975). |
| Ishino et al., “Design and Preparation of Pulsatile Release Tablet as a New Oral Drug Delivery System,” Chem. Pharm. Bull. 40(11):3036-3041 (1992). |
| Kaneto et al., 2000, Latest Pharmacy, Hirokawa Publishing Co., 1 Edition (English translation). |
| Kawashima, “Low-Substituted Hydroxypropylcellulose as a Sustained-Drug Release Matrix Base or Disintegrant Depending on Its Particle Size and Loading in Formulation,” Pharm. Res. 1993, vol. 10(3), pp. 351-355. |
| Kornblum, “A New Tablet Disintegrating Agent,” J. Pharm. Sci., Jan. 1973, vol. 62(1), pp. 43-49. |
| Kratochvil et al., “Atomoxetine: a selective noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder,” Expert Opin. Pharmacother. 4(7):1165-1174 (2003). |
| McKenna et al., “Effect of particle size on the compaction mechanism and tensile strength of tablets,” J. Pharm. Pharmacol. Jun. 1982, vol. 34(6), pp. 347-351. |
| McKetta et al., “Table of Contents,” Encyclopedia of Chemical Processing and Design (1989). |
| McKetta et al., Encyclopedia of Chemical Processing and Design, “Organic Phase Separation Conservation,” p. 167 (1989). |
| Mitsuo et al., Pharmaceutics Manual, 1989, Pharmaceutics Manual, Nanzando Co. Ltd. (English translation). |
| Nwokole et al., “Tolerance during 29 days of conventional dosing with cimetidine, mizatidine, famotidine or ranitidine,” Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 4(Suppl. 1):29-45 (1990) Abstract only. |
| Ohira et al., “Effects of Various Histamine H2-Receptor Antagonists on Gastrointestinal Motility and Gastric Emptying,” J. Smooth Muscle Res. 29:131-142 (1993) (English translation). |
| Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation dated Nov. 1, 2001 No. 388 “On state quality standards of drugs” with “OST 91500.05.001-00. Industry Standard. The quality standards of medicines. The main provisions.” Section “Dosage Forms. Terms and Definitions” p. 1-5. 2001. Russia Federation (and English translation). |
| Pharmaceutical Excipients. London: Pharmaceutical Press. Electronic Version, 2006, Mannitol. |
| Pharmaceutical Excipients. London: Pharmaceutical Press. Electronic Version, 2006, Lactose Monohydrate. |
| Pharmaceutical Excipients. London: Pharmaceutical Press. Electronic Version, 2006, Croscarmellose sodium. |
| Rudnic et al., “Some Effects of Relatively Low Levels of Eight Tablet Disintegrants on a Direct Compression System,” Drug. Dev. Ind. Pharm. 1981, vol. 7(3), pp. 347-358. |
| Rudnic et al., “Studies of the Utility of Cross Linked Polyvinlpolypyrrolidine as a Tablet Disintegrant,” Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy, 1980, vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 291-309. |
| Sato et al., “Anticonvulsant effects of tigabine, a new antiepileptic drug: the profile of action in the rat kindling model of epilepsy,” Epilepsia 37(Supp. 3):110-111 (1996). |
| Shangraw et al., “A new era of tablet disintegrants,” Pharm. Technol. 1980, vol. 4(10), pp. 49-57. |
| Simpson and Jarvis, “Fexofenadine. A Review of its Use in the Management of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis and Chronic Idiopathic Urticaria,” Drugs 59(2):301-321 (2000). |
| Solodovnick, V.D. “Microcapsulation”, Chimiya, Moscow, 1980, pp. 139-148. (English translation). |
| Tirkkonen and Paronen, “Enhancement of drug release from ethylcellulose microcapsules using solid sodium chloride in the wall,” Int. J. Pharmaceutics 88:39-51 (1992). |
| Trottier and Wood, 2005, “Particle Size Measurement,” Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology (Extract of 1. Introduction; 2. Data Representation; 4. Measurement Methods; 8. Selection of Equipment). |
| Ueki et al., “Nizatidine Comparably Enhances Postprandial Gastric Motility to Existing Gastroprokinetics in Dogs,” Jpn. Pharmacol. Ther. 28(11):925-930 (2000) (English translation). |
| Van Kamp et al., “Improvement by super disintegrants of the properties of tablets containing lactose, prepared by wet granulation,” Pharmaceutisch Weekblad Scientific Edition; 1983, vol. 5, pp. 165-171. |
| Vromans et al., “Studies on tableting properties of lactose,” Pharmaceutisch Weekblad Scientific Edition; 1985, vol. 7, pp. 186-193. |
| Yamahara et al., “Effect of release rate on bioavailability of control-release multiple unit dosage forms,” Yakuzaigaku 55(2):99-107 (1995). |
| Yamamoto et al., “The Effects of Nizatidine on the Function of Esophageal Motility in Patients with Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD),” Jpn. Pharmacol. Ther. 28(5):419-424 (2000) (English translation). |
| Zheng et al., “Influence of Eudragit® NE 30 D Blended with Eudragit® L 30 D-55 on the Release of Phenylpropanolamine Hydrochloride from Coated Pellets,” Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy 29(3):357-366 (2003). |
| European Search Report, 3 pages, European patent appl. No. 01103129.1, European Patent Office (dated Jun. 9, 2001). |
| International Search Report, 4 pages, PCT International Application No. PCT/US01/04012, European Patent Office (dated Jun. 19, 2001). |
| International Search Report, 6 pages, PCT International Application No. PCT/US02/39238, European Patent Office (dated May 8, 2003). |
| International Preliminary Examination Report, 3 pages, from International Patent Appl. No. PCT/US02/31535, European Patent Office (dated Jun. 19, 2003). |
| International Preliminary Examination Report, 6 pages, PCT International Application No. PCT/US02/39238, United States Patent and Trademark Office (dated Apr. 27, 2005). |
| Written Opinion, 5 pages, PCT International Application No. PCT/US02/39238, United States Patent and Trademark Office (dated Jan. 13, 2005). |
| International Search Report, 4 pages, from International Appl. No. PCT/US2005/037084, European Patent Office, Rijswijk, The Netherlands (dated Jun. 1, 2006). |
| Written Opinion of the International Search Authority, 6 pages, from International Appl. No. PCT/US2005/037084, European Patent Office, Munich, Germany (dated Jun. 1, 2006). |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability, 5 pages, from International Appl. No. PCT/US2005/037084, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, Virginia, USA (dated Aug. 24, 2007). |
| International Search Report, 4 pages, from International Appl. No. PCT/US2005/038328, European Patent Office, Rijswijk, The Netherlands (dated Sep. 15, 2006). |
| Written Opinion of the International Search Authority, 5 pages, from International Appl. No. PCT/US2005/038328, European Patent Office, Munich, Germany (dated Sep. 15, 2006). |
| International Search Report, 5 pages, International Patent Appl. No. PCT/US2006/016538, European Patent Office (dated Feb. 27, 2007). |
| Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, 6 pages, International Patent Appl. No. PCT/US2006/016538, European Patent Office (dated Feb. 27, 2007). |
| International Search Report, 4 pages, PCT International Application No. PCT/USIB2010/003196, European Patent Office (dated Nov. 17, 2011). |
| Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, 5 pages, PCT International Application No. PCT/USIB2010/003196, European Patent Office (dated Nov. 17, 2011). |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20160081991 A1 | Mar 2016 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61354575 | Jun 2010 | US | |
| 61265823 | Dec 2009 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 14049818 | Oct 2013 | US |
| Child | 14956786 | US | |
| Parent | 12959113 | Dec 2010 | US |
| Child | 14049818 | US |
