The present U.S. patent application claims priority to European Patent Application No. 17210227.9, filed Dec. 22, 2017, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
The invention relates to plastic film preferably with a thickness of 50 to 300 microns, comprising a polyolefin homopolymer or copolymer, a polyether copolymer having a melting point between 100° C. and 120° C. and a layer comprising oxygen barrier polymer.
Plastic containers have been increasingly used in packaging applications, such as “food packaging”. A typical plastic container often used for bulk packaging of food (e.g. powdery food, coffee, cocoa, nuts) is called FIBC (=flexible intermediate bulk container). This type of container often is a woven polyethylene or polypropylene.
In the inside or outside of the woven material, another plastic liner is often used. This liner is a monolayer or a multilayer and comprises polymer materials. There are different types of adherence of this liner to the outer woven liner as shown e.g. in U.S. Pat. No. 6,374,579.
In the case of a multilayer, the different layers offer different advantages to the final applications. The inside layer (=the layer coming into direct contact with the food packed) is often formulated to allow very good sealing, thus protecting from the existence of leakers that would be detrimental for the packed product. Other layers may comprise abuse resistant polymers to increase the mechanical strength of the material.
In case of oxygen sensitive food materials, at least one layer of the multilayer construction comprises material which is impermeable to oxygen. As it is well known in the art, such materials are e.g. polyamides, PVDC or EVOH.
Often the multilayer film is in “gusseted tube” configuration. The reason is that this configuration is more practical for bulk filling, transport and unloading versus a simple tube.
Gussets are produced in line with the process by the use of two “pleating constructions” (often wooden or metal boards) which the film follows. As these multilayer tube materials are often produced with the “hot blown film” method which involves rotation of the collapsing frame-nip roll section, a common problem is that creases are present continuously or periodically following the rotation and this increases the scrap and lowers the efficiency of the operation. There are cases where the creases are so often that the tubular film cannot be processed into a gusseted tube.
It is generally known in the art that less stiff polymers e.g. LDPE have better gussetability versus stiffer ones like HDPE. It is believed that the material must be softer and more pliable in order to form efficiently a gusset during the production process. Barrier materials with high oxygen barrier properties such as EVOH or polyamide make the gusseting process even more difficult as they are usually stiffer than polyolefins.
Patent application EP 3 216 599 A1 teaches a way to improve gussetability by using a polyether copolymer (with polyamide or polyolefins) in blend with polyolefins in at least one layer of the film. This invention has the drawback that sealing temperatures start from 140° C. to 160° C. i.e. in conditions higher than pure polyolefins such as polyethylene. There is a need to move the sealing temperature “window” to lower temperatures e.g. down to 120° C. in order to produce liners at same or similar conditions with normal polyethylene non-barrier liners.
There is further a need to improve the gussetability of the plastic structure ie to find materials pliable enough and with enough bubble stability to produce gussets with no creases in the commonly used thickness range of 50-300 microns without sacrificing the oxygen barrier properties of the plastic film. There is also a need to combine this improvement in gussetability with the above requirements in sealing at low temperatures.
It has been unexpectedly found that the addition of polyether copolymers with melting point of 100° C. to 120° C. in blends with polyolefins improve very much the gussetability of oxygen barrier plastic films and at the same time lower the seal initiation temperature of the film to 120° C.
According to the invention a very suitable film for the FIBC liner has preferably an average thickness of 50 to 300, more preferably an average thickness of 60 to 150, most preferably an average thickness of 60 to 130 microns and comprises
Further preferred embodiments of the invention will be explained in the detailed description of the invention.
In this application the following definitions are used:
The term “gusset” is interpreted as well known in the art. That is a plastic tubular film having a partial 4-fold configuration.
The term “film” refers to a flat or tubular flexible structure of thermoplastic material.
The term “heat shrinkable” refers to a film that shrinks at least 10% in at least one of the longitudinal and transverse directions when heated at 90° C. for 4 seconds. The shrinkability is measured according to ASTM 2732.
The phrase “longitudinal direction” or “machine direction” herein abbreviated “MD” refers to a direction along the length of the film.
The phrase “outer layer” refers to the film layer which comes in immediate contact with the outside environment (atmosphere).
The phrase “inner layer” refers to the film layer that comes in direct contact with the product packed. This is also called “sealing layer” as this layer must be hermetically sealed in order to protect the product from ingress of air.
The phrase “intermediate layer” refers to any layer of the film that is neither outer nor inner layer. A film may comprise more than one intermediate layers.
As used herein, the term “homopolymer” refers to a polymer resulting from polymerization of a single monomer.
As used herein, the term “copolymer” refers to a polymer resulting from polymerization of at least two different polymers.
As used herein, the term “polymer” includes both above types.
As used herein, the term “polyolefin” includes all the polymers produced by polymerization of olefins. Polyethylene, polypropylene, polybutylene and other products are included in this general category.
As used herein the term “polyethylene” identifies polymers consisting essentially of the ethylene repeating unit. The ones that have a density more than 0.940 are called high density polyethylene (HDPE), the ones that are have less than 0.940 are low density polyethylene (LDPE).
As used herein the phrase “ethylene alpha olefin copolymer” refers to polymers like linear low-density polyethylene (LLDPE), medium density polyethylene (MDPE), very low density polyethylene (VLDPE), ultra-low density polyethylene (ULDPE), metallocene catalysed polymers and polyethylene plastomers and elastomers.
In these cases, the alpha olefin can be propene, butene, hexene, octene etc as known in the art.
As used herein the term “homogeneous ethylene alpha olefin copolymers” refer to ethylene alpha olefin copolymers having a molecular weight distribution MWD (Mw/Mn) of less than 2.7 as measured by GPC. Typical examples of these polymers are AFFINITY from DOW or Exact from Exxon.
As used herein the phrase “styrene polymers” refers to styrene homopolymer such as polystyrene and to styrene copolymers such as styrene-butadiene copolymers, styrene-butadiene-styrene copolymers, styrene-isoprene-styrene copolymers, styrene-ethylene-butadiene-styrene copolymers, ethylene-styrene copolymers and the like.
As used herein the phrase “ethylene methacrylate copolymers” refers to copolymers of ethylene and methacrylate monomer. The monomer content is less than 40% by weight. Abbreviation used is EMA.
As used herein the phrase “ethylene vinyl acetate copolymer” refers to copolymers of ethylene and vinyl acetate. Abbreviation used is EVA.
As used herein the term “oxygen barrier polymer” refers to polymers that do not allow the ingress of oxygen in packs. Typical materials are polyamide, EVOH or PVDC.
As used herein, the term EVOH refers to saponified products of ethylene vinyl ester copolymers. The ethylene content is typically in the range of 25 to 50% per mol.
As used herein the term PVDC refers to a vinylidene chloride copolymer wherein a major amount of the copolymer comprises vinylidene chloride and a minor amount of the copolymer comprises one or more monomers such as vinyl chloride and/or alkyl acrylates and methacrylates.
As used herein the term polyamide refers to homopolymers and copolymers that include amide linkages as well known in the art.
As used herein the term “ionomer” refers to ethylene-acid copolymers which have been neutralized by metals such as sodium, zinc, lithium or others.
The acid used is usually methacrylic or acrylic acid.
As used herein, the term “ethylene acid copolymer” refers to copolymers of ethylene with acid, most usually methacrylic or acrylic acid.
As used herein, the term “polyester” includes crystalline polymers, amorphous polymers and polyester elastomers. Common polyesters are crystalline PET (polyethylene terephthalate), amorphous PET, PETG (glycol modified polyethylene terephthalate), PBT (polybutylene terephthalate), PTT (polytrimethylene terephthalate), PBN (polybutylene naphthalate), PEN (polyethylene naphthalate), polyester-ether block copolymers and polyester-ester block copolymers of hard and soft blocks.
Other polyester materials are also included in the above definition.
As used herein the term “polybutylene” refers to butene-1 homopolymers and copolymers. Useful copolymers comprise ethylene mer units. Ethylene content should be generally less than 50% by weight.
All measurement methods mentioned herein are readily available for the skilled person. For example, they can be obtained from the American National Standards Institute at: www.webstore.ansi.org.
All percentages used are per weight unless stated otherwise.
The present invention relates to a film comprising
In a preferred embodiment, the film is in the form of gusseted tube.
In a further preferred embodiment, the average thickness of the film is in the range 50-300 microns, preferably 60-150 microns, more preferably 60-130 microns.
In a further preferred embodiment, the polyolefin homopolymer or copolymer is an ethylene alpha olefin copolymer. In a further preferred embodiment, the alpha olefin is butene, hexene or octene. In a further preferred embodiment, the ethylene alpha olefin copolymers are produced with metallocene catalysts.
Preferably the film comprises 5 to 15 layers, more preferably 7 to 12 layers.
A typical example of the film construction in 7-layer mode is
The film is preferably produced by the hot blown film method and is not heat shrinkable.
Barrier Layer(s)
The film in a preferable embodiment contains high oxygen barrier materials so that it protects the components of the pack from the detrimental effect of oxygen ingress.
EVOH is a preferred option but also polyamide and PVDC are viable alternatives. The EVOH comprises preferably 24% to 50% ethylene per mol, more preferably 27% to 48%.
In another preferred embodiment of the invention, the barrier polymer is polyamide. Most suitable polyamides are polyamide 6 and copolymer 6/66 or 6/12.
Intermediate Layer(s)
Preferably, the intermediate layers comprise different polyolefins. Preferred polyolefins are ethylene alpha olefin copolymers, where alpha olefin is preferably butene, hexene or octene.
In a preferred embodiment the ethylene alpha olefin copolymers are random copolymers with densities from 0.870 g/cm3 up to 0.960 g/cm3. In a further preferred embodiment, the molecular weight distribution MWD (Mw/Mn) as measured by GPC of the ethylene alpha olefin copolymers is less than 10, preferably less than 5, preferably less than 3.
Tie Layer(s)
As well known in the art, there is no natural adhesion between polyolefins and oxygen barrier polymers such as EVOH.
Suitable materials for the tie layer process include maleic anhydride modified EVA, maleic anhydride modified polyethylene, maleic anhydride modified EMA, maleic anhydride modified elastomer, partially saponified EVA copolymer and polyurethane elastomer.
In the tie layers also polyamides can be used, given the strong natural adhesion between polyamide and EVOH. Preferred polyamides are polyamide 6, polyamide 6/66 and polyamide 6/12.
Outer Layer
The outer layer of the film preferably comprises ethylene alpha olefin copolymers and/or low-density polyethylene (LDPE) produced by Ziegler Natta or metallocene catalyst. Polypropylene, ethylene vinyl acetate, ethylene methyl acrylate, ethylene butyl acrylate, ionomer, polyester and polyamide is also possible.
Inner Layer
The inner layer of the film would be able to seal the film to itself to secure that no leakers and oxygen influx is allowed. This could be detrimental to the product packed.
Suitable materials for the inner layer include different polyolefins, preferably ethylene alpha olefin copolymers, low density polyethylene, polypropylene, ethylene vinyl acetate, ethylene methyl acrylate, ionomer, ethylene butyl acrylate and the like.
In general, the above layers may comprise further well known in the art additives such as antiblock, slip, antifog, polymer processing enhancers and others.
Polyether Copolymers
We have unexpectedly noticed that by adding polyether copolymers having a melting point of 100° C. to 120° C. in the inner layer, the seal initiation temperature of the film drops to 120° C. while the gussetability of the film remains very good. The film is nicely transformed inline to a gusseted tube without any creasing during the whole rotation of the collapsing frame. Preferably, the polyether copolymers having a melting point of 100° C. to 120° C. are added in the inner layer, in an amount of 5% to 20% by weight.
Preferred polyether copolymers are copolymers with polyolefins, polyamides or polyester. A typical example of a polyether copolymer useful for the invention is Pelestat LM230 from Sanyo Chemical.
In a preferred embodiment the melting points of the polyether copolymers are in the range 100° C. to 120° C., preferably 110° C. to 120° C. If the melting temperature is lower the gussetability is compromised by the higher friction due to polymer tackiness while if the melting temperatures are higher the sealing initiation temperature increases.
The preferred melt flow index (MFI) of the polyether copolymer is more than 12 at 190° C. and 21.18 N measured according to ASTM D 1238.
This term as used in the present application is defined as the lower sealing temperature which allows the average sealing strength (measured according to ASTM F88) to be at least 25N/15 mm seal width when the sealing time is 2 seconds, sealing pressure is 4 bars and the sealing station is impulse type. Films of the present invention have seal initiation temperature less than 130° C., preferably less than 125° C., preferable less than 120° C., preferably less than 115° C.
The melting point of the polyether copolymer is measured by DSC (=differential scanning calorimetry) as well known in the art. The polyether copolymer used in the present invention has a melting point between 100° C. and 120° C.
The preferred method for producing the film of the present invention is how blown film as well known in the art.
From a commercial hot blown film line we produced the following film
Outer layer was a blend of
89% LDPE+10% polyether copolymer+1% slip antiblock masterbatch.
LDPE density was 0.923 while MFI was 0.75 under 1900/2.16 kilos
Intermediate layer 1 was a blend of
60% ethylene hexene copolymer+40% LDPE
The density of ethylene hexene copolymer was 0.919 while MFI was 1 under 190° C./2.16 kilos
LDPE was same as used in the outer layer.
Tie layer 1 was maleic anhydride LLDPE based copolymer
Tie layer 2 was similar to tie layer 1
Intermediate layer 2 was exactly the same as intermediate layer 1.
Inner layer was a blend of
89% metallocene LLDPE +10% polyether copolymer+1% slip antiblock masterbatch Metallocene LLDPE had a density of 0.918 while MFI was 1 under 190° C./2.16 kilos
Polyether copolymer used was Pelestat LM230 from Sanyo Chemical.
In the case of example 2 the LDPE used in the outer layer was replaced by the ethylene hexene copolymer used in intermediate layer 1.
In this example, the EVOH 38% was replaced by 32% which is stiffer and thought to be more difficult to form gusset.
The comparative example was like example 1 but with the polyether copolymer removed and replaced by MV PEBAX 1074 SA01. This material has a melting point of 158° C. as measured by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC).
On the tower of the blown film line two gusset boards were mounted as known in the art. Each example structure ran in production for 2 hours and the number of creases was monitored. As the creases tend to come along in timely intervals, we recorded “creasing instances”, meaning we recorded any incident when more than 3 creases passed from the nip section of the blown film line.
The rotation speed was kept constant during all experiments.
Examples 1 and 2 recorded 2 instances while example 3 recorded 3.
The comparative example recorded 2 instances.
Therefore, the invention keeps the good gussetability of the prior art.
Test of the seal initiation was done in a Toss sealing machine, keeping the sealing time at 2 seconds and seal pressure at 4 bars. Sealing was done inner side to inner side.
The measured seal initiation temperature of example 1 was found to be 120° C. while for the comparative example a seal initiation temperature of 170° C. has been measured.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
17210227 | Dec 2017 | EP | regional |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2380054 | Lautmann | Aug 1943 | A |
2376185 | Randall | May 1945 | A |
3214884 | Langdon | Nov 1965 | A |
3299194 | Golike | Jan 1967 | A |
3456044 | Pahlke | Jul 1969 | A |
3536192 | Couper | Oct 1970 | A |
3846569 | Kaplan | Nov 1974 | A |
3908336 | Forslund | Sep 1975 | A |
3956229 | Bollen et al. | May 1976 | A |
4064296 | Bornstein et al. | Dec 1977 | A |
4207363 | Lustig | Jun 1980 | A |
4207364 | Nyberg | Jun 1980 | A |
4220684 | Olson | Sep 1980 | A |
4254869 | Heier | Mar 1981 | A |
4362834 | Lefevre et al. | Dec 1982 | A |
4399181 | Yoshimura et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4595433 | Ford et al. | Jun 1986 | A |
4612221 | Biel et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4619849 | Anzawa et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
4650721 | Ashcraft et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4701360 | Gibbons et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4705707 | Winter | Nov 1987 | A |
4716061 | Winter | Dec 1987 | A |
4724185 | Shah | Feb 1988 | A |
4786561 | Fong | Nov 1988 | A |
4801486 | Quacquarella et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4828915 | Schroeder et al. | May 1989 | A |
4857399 | Vicik | Aug 1989 | A |
4863769 | Lustig et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4869049 | Richards et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4879430 | Hoffman | Nov 1989 | A |
4911979 | Nishimoto et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4912149 | Robeson et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4934529 | Richards et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4941310 | Kristen | Jul 1990 | A |
4948657 | Ogawa et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4976898 | Lustig et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
4977022 | Mueller | Dec 1990 | A |
4990562 | Chou et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5001192 | Sun | Mar 1991 | A |
5002996 | Okuda et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5034281 | Kawasaki et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5079051 | Garland et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5092105 | Bish | Mar 1992 | A |
5142123 | Chou | Aug 1992 | A |
5145728 | Itaba et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5169708 | Amaral et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5179168 | Hirasawa | Jan 1993 | A |
5256351 | Lustig et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5256428 | Lustig et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5296580 | Matsunaga et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5298202 | Schirmer | Mar 1994 | A |
5302402 | Dudenhoeffer et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5350788 | Visioli et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5358792 | Mehta et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5382470 | Vicik | Jan 1995 | A |
5397613 | Georgelos | Mar 1995 | A |
5562958 | Walton et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5593747 | Georgelos | Jan 1997 | A |
5645788 | Bekele | Jul 1997 | A |
5698279 | Vicik | Dec 1997 | A |
5759648 | Idlas | Jun 1998 | A |
5834077 | Babrowicz | Nov 1998 | A |
5837335 | Babrowicz | Nov 1998 | A |
5851610 | Ristey et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5888615 | Mascarenhas et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5983607 | Mihalov et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6013378 | White et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6058998 | Kristen | May 2000 | A |
6065272 | Lecomte | May 2000 | A |
6074715 | Lind et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6088996 | Maruyama | Jul 2000 | A |
6120860 | Bowen | Sep 2000 | A |
6146726 | Yoshii et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6220753 | Metzger | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6221410 | Ramesh et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6258423 | Giori | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6274246 | Eggers et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6299984 | Forloni | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6346285 | Ramesh | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6346576 | Takahashi | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6374579 | Muller | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6383589 | Horan et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6406763 | Wolf et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6458437 | Ito et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6506463 | Cahill et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6514583 | Ahlgren et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6516588 | Jensen et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6531198 | Lind et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6534137 | Vadhar | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6558760 | Paleari et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6572959 | Buongiorno et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6592975 | Ueyama et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6610046 | Usami et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6663905 | Ennis et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6682792 | Schmal et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6682825 | Kennedy et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6777046 | Tatarka et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6869686 | Idlas | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6960635 | Stevens et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6984695 | Brown et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7473473 | Verrocchi | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7504158 | Berrier et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7611770 | Kennedy et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7736726 | McAllister et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
8129006 | Ginossatis | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8697211 | Gkinosatis | Apr 2014 | B2 |
9290320 | Gkinosatis | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9365687 | Gkinosatis | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9440778 | Gkinosatis | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9440788 | Gkinosatis | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9604430 | Gkinosatis | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9789669 | Gkinosatis | Oct 2017 | B2 |
10287094 | Gkinosatis | May 2019 | B2 |
20020038535 | Jensen et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020066261 | Richards | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020119334 | Shepard et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020151653 | Jeong et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020172834 | Rivett et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030008084 | Vicik et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030012900 | Wolf et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030073785 | Okada et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030124452 | Nair et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030131569 | Chomik et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030153688 | Lindahl et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030213804 | Chomik et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030218022 | Chomik et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030220453 | Ebara et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040020175 | Stravitz | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040020913 | Hovorka | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040043238 | Wuest et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040048086 | Kennedy et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040065052 | Ramesh et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040074904 | Share et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040115453 | McAllister, Jr. et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040157077 | Roussos | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040158016 | Lee et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040159972 | Koschmieder et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040194433 | Chomik et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050044819 | Chomik et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050064123 | Chomik et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050079372 | Schmal et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050098927 | Iseki et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050129811 | Kraimer et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050147778 | Tai et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050148268 | Tai | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050191439 | Hirose et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050235611 | Roussos | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050239961 | Saraf et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050271877 | Ginossatis | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060010837 | Jurus | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060172143 | Breese et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060177616 | Barber et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060177641 | Breese et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060188676 | Dambricourt | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060199030 | Liang et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060199911 | Markovich et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060199912 | Fuchs et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060254219 | Alipour et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060272767 | Kreitman et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060283153 | Nakano | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060286323 | Siegel et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070031546 | Nelson et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070042089 | Grah | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070082150 | Ginossatis | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070089688 | Nitzsche et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070092748 | Suzuki et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070098933 | Opuszko et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070178285 | Rasanen et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070237916 | Rasmussen et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070276110 | Michie et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080003332 | Ginossatis | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080070047 | Rehkugler et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080095960 | Schell et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080115463 | Wilson | May 2008 | A1 |
20080221273 | Michie, Jr. et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080233375 | Wright et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080255311 | Chang et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080274314 | Gkinosatis | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080274328 | Gkinosatis | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080305220 | Gkinosatis | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090013656 | Nasiatka et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090034886 | Conforti | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090123614 | Bernig et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090176117 | Gkinosatis | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090191392 | Gkinosatis | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090196962 | Gkinosatis | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090240227 | Toro et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090263599 | Gkinosatis | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100028574 | Gkinosatis | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100032098 | Lalli et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100034939 | Gkinosatis | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100221391 | Fenghua et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110039064 | Wani et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110159263 | Gkinosatis | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110285048 | Barger et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120141744 | Ambroise | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120213896 | Owensby et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120279181 | Gkinosatis | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120289645 | Tice et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130019568 | Gkinosatis | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130209797 | Gkinosatis | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130227916 | Gkinosatis | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130255498 | Shibata | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20150010764 | Gkinosatis | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150122129 | Shibata | May 2015 | A1 |
20150210454 | Gkinosatis | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20160176612 | Gkinosatis | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160236862 | Gkinosatis | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20170259542 | Gkinosatis | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20190193379 | Gkinosatis | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190241335 | Ginosatis | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190283383 | Ginosatis | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20200180284 | Ginosatis | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20210245478 | Ginosatis | Aug 2021 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
511 195 | Jul 1980 | AU |
104695251 | Jun 2015 | CN |
2017-133 | Sep 2017 | CZ |
0 005 660 | Nov 1979 | EP |
0144239 | Jun 1985 | EP |
0243510 | Nov 1987 | EP |
0 286 407 | Oct 1988 | EP |
0 402 043 | Dec 1990 | EP |
0 472 418 | Feb 1992 | EP |
0292477 | Mar 1993 | EP |
0 627 465 | Dec 1994 | EP |
0 686 497 | Dec 1995 | EP |
0 810 087 | Dec 1997 | EP |
0810077 | Dec 1997 | EP |
1 072 632 | Jan 2001 | EP |
1300238 | Apr 2003 | EP |
0 930 349 | Jun 2003 | EP |
1 060 077 | Jun 2003 | EP |
1 131 205 | Dec 2004 | EP |
1 514 680 | Mar 2005 | EP |
1592078 | Nov 2005 | EP |
1 415 930 | Apr 2006 | EP |
1 770 116 | Apr 2007 | EP |
1 854 625 | Nov 2007 | EP |
08162162.5 | Aug 2008 | EP |
1 985 440 | Oct 2008 | EP |
1 985 443 | Oct 2008 | EP |
1 995 058 | Nov 2008 | EP |
2 077 239 | Jul 2009 | EP |
2 077 297 | Jul 2009 | EP |
2 085 216 | Aug 2009 | EP |
2 111 979 | Oct 2009 | EP |
2 147 783 | Jan 2010 | EP |
2 194 006 | Jun 2010 | EP |
2 332 723 | Jun 2011 | EP |
2 520 518 | Nov 2012 | EP |
2985148 | Feb 2016 | EP |
3216599 | Sep 2017 | EP |
792290 | Mar 1958 | GB |
1 140 765 | Jan 1969 | GB |
2 203 326 | Oct 1988 | GB |
2 236 531 | Apr 1991 | GB |
62107810 | May 1987 | JP |
03 200534 | Sep 1991 | JP |
H06322140 | Nov 1994 | JP |
07196818 | Aug 1995 | JP |
07206004 | Aug 1995 | JP |
07206005 | Aug 1995 | JP |
07206006 | Aug 1995 | JP |
2002-234975 | Aug 2002 | JP |
2003-159761 | Jun 2003 | JP |
2005-047959 | Feb 2005 | JP |
2005-335111 | Dec 2005 | JP |
2006-247870 | Sep 2006 | JP |
567768 | Nov 2009 | NZ |
567767 | May 2010 | NZ |
WO1996001736 | Jan 1996 | WO |
WO 9712758 | Apr 1997 | WO |
WO1997046384 | Dec 1997 | WO |
WO1998021274 | May 1998 | WO |
WO1998021276 | May 1998 | WO |
WO1999044824 | Sep 1999 | WO |
WO1999057612 | Nov 1999 | WO |
WO2000061439 | Oct 2000 | WO |
WO0063085 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO2001023268 | Apr 2001 | WO |
WO2002026493 | Apr 2002 | WO |
WO2003020515 | Mar 2003 | WO |
WO 2003061959 | Jul 2003 | WO |
WO2006053885 | May 2006 | WO |
WO2006075141 | Jul 2006 | WO |
WO 2006076393 | Jul 2006 | WO |
WO2006102152 | Sep 2006 | WO |
WO053603 | May 2007 | WO |
WO2008091321 | Jul 2008 | WO |
WO2008118554 | Oct 2008 | WO |
WO 2009052291 | Apr 2009 | WO |
WO 2011029597 | Mar 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Decision on Appeal corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 12/957,947 dated Sep. 18, 2020. |
Office Action corresponding to European Patent Application No. 10193414.9 dated Apr. 7, 2020. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 14/946,169 dated Aug. 21, 2020. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 16/227,191 dated Aug. 31, 2020. |
Advisory Action and AFCP 2.0 Decision corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 14/612,175 dated Jun. 1, 2020. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 12/322,347 dated Aug. 19, 2019. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 14/612,175 dated Aug. 20, 2019. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 14/612,175 dated Mar. 3, 2020. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 12/322,347 dated Mar. 3, 2020. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 14/946,169 dated Apr. 30, 2020. |
Search Report corresponding to Turkish Patent Application No. 2018/19787 dated Mar. 27, 2020. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 14/612,175 dated Jun. 10, 2020. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 12/322,347 dated Jul. 2, 2020. |
Advisory Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 12/322,347 dated Nov. 23, 2020. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 14/612,175 dated Nov. 23, 2020. |
Extended European Search Report corresponding to European Patent Application No. 18213603.6-1107 dated Apr. 3, 2019. |
Extended European Search Report corresponding to European Patent Application No. 18213611.9-1107 dated Apr. 3, 2019. |
Office Action corresponding to European Patent Application No. 10193414.9 dated Apr. 11, 2019. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 14/946,169 dated Jul. 5, 2019. |
“15.13xEA—Ethylene Vinyl Acetate (EVA) Copolymers (>50% Ethylene)—European Adhesives,” The ChemQuest Group, Inc. http://web.archive.org/web/20080219220919/http://www.chemquest.com/store/ethylene-vinyl-acetate-copolymers-european-adhesives.html (Aug. 26, 2011) (2 pages). |
Adsyl 6 C 30 F, LyondellBasell Industries Holdings, B.V., pp. 1-2 (2014). |
Adsyl 7572 XCP, LyondellBasell Industries Holdings, B.V., pp. 1-2 (Oct. 3, 2014). |
Advisory Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 12/319,150 dated Nov. 13, 2013. |
Advisory Action and AFCP 2.0 Decision corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 11/801,609 dated Jun. 16, 2016. |
Advisory Action, Examiner Initiated Interview Summary, and AFCP 2.0 Decision corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 14/612,175 dated Jan. 4, 2017. |
Annonymous, “Advantages of metallocene ethylene [olymer resins in multilayer stretch films,” Research Disclosure, Mason Publications, Hampshire, GB. vol. 419, No. 26, pp. 1-22 (1999). |
Annonymous, “Some benefits from the use of metallocene ethylene polymers in blown and cast films,” Research Disclosure, Mason Publications, Hampshire, GB. vol. 392, No. 54, pp. 1-6 (1996). |
ASTM D 1003-07 “Haze and Luminous Transmittance of Transparent Plastics,” ASTM International. pp. 1-7 (Nov. 2007). |
ASTM D 1525-07 “Vicat Softening Temperature of Plastics,” ASTM International, pp. 1-9 (Mar. 2007). |
ASTM D 2732-03 “Unrestrained Linear Thermal Shrinkage of Plastic Film and Sheeting,” ASTM International, pp. 1-5 (Oct. 2003). |
ASTM D3418-08. Standard Test Method for Transition Temperatures and Enthalpies of Fusion and Crystallization of Polymers by Differential Scanning Calorimetry. American National Standards Institute. pp. 1-7 (Dec. 2008). |
ASTM D3985. Standard Test Method for Oxygen Gas Transmission Rate Through Plastic Film and Sheeting Using a Coulometric Sensor. American National Standards Institute, pp. 1-7 (Nov. 2012). |
ASTM D882-09. Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Thin Plastic Sheeting. American National Standards Institute, pp. 1-9 (Jan. 2009). |
ASTM F1927-07. Standard Test Method for Determination of Oxygen Gas Transmission Rate, Permeability and Permeance at Controlled Relative Humidity Through Barrier Materials Using a Coulometric Detector. American National Standards Institute, pp. 1-6 (Aug. 2007). |
“Baymod L 2450,” Product Data Sheet, LANXESS. (2 pages) (2007). |
BS 2782-0:2004 “Methods of Testing Plastics,” British Standards Institution, pp. 1-29 (2004). |
Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC corresponding to European Patent Application Serial No. 12 192 895.6 dated May 12, 2014. |
Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC corresponding to European Patent Application Serial No. 12 192 895.6 dated Feb. 18, 2015. |
Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC corresponding to European Patent Application Serial. No. 12 192 895.6 dated Dec. 9, 2015. |
Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC corresponding to European Patent Application Serial No. 12 192 895.6 dated Oct. 7, 2016. |
Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC corresponding to European Patent Application Serial No. 12 192 895.6 dated Apr. 13, 2017. |
Communication under Rule 71(3) EPC Intention to Grant corresponding to European Patent Application Serial No. 12 192 895.6 dated Apr. 20, 2018. |
“DuPontTM Elvax® 3170,” DuPont Packaging & Industrial Polymers. 3 pages (2004) http://web.archive.org/web/20060516114601/http://www2.dupont.com/Elvax/en_US/assets/downloads/vax3170.pdf. |
Eltax P KS399, Published by INEOS Olefins & Polymers Europe, pp. 1-2 (Nov. 2013). |
“Elvaloy resins,” Product Data Sheet, DuPont Packaging & Industrial Polymers. (2 pages) (2010). |
English abstract of JP 2005-103902, USUI, Apr. 2005. |
European Search Report corresponding to European Patent Application No. 08173057.4-2307 dated Sep. 22, 2009. |
European Search Report corresponding to European Patent Application No. 08173056.6-2109 dated Mar. 16, 2009. |
Extended European Search report corresponding to European Patent Application No. 09151289.7-2124 dated Jun. 8, 2009. |
Extended European Search Report corresponding to European Patent Application No. 05021541.7-2115 dated Dec. 2, 2005. |
Extended European Search Report corresponding to European Patent Application No. 08156814 dated Oct. 9, 2008. |
Extended European Search Report corresponding to European Patent Application No. 08154742.4-2124 dated Jul. 2, 2009. |
Extended European Search Report corresponding to European Patent Application No. 10193414.9-1217 dated May 9, 2011. |
Extended European Search Report corresponding to European Patent Application No. 12192895.6-1708 dated Mar. 1, 2013. |
“Filling and sealing of containers” in Fellows, P.J. Food Processing Technology—Principles and Practice (2nd Edition), Woodhead Publishing, pp. 511-527 (2000). |
Harper, “Modern Plastics Handbook,” McGraw-Hill: New York, New York. pp. 3.17-3.22 (2000). |
Hough, M., and Dolbey, R., “Modern Plastics Compendium, vol. 1—Key Properties and Sources,” Smithers Rapra Technology. pp. 87-124 (1995). |
Huskić, M., and {hacek over (S)}ebenik, A., “Characterization of Crosslinked Ethylene-Vinylacetate Copolymers,” Polymer International. vol. 31, No. 1 pp. 41-44 (1993). |
Interview Summary corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 11/801,609 dated Jul. 31, 2012. |
Interview Summary corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 12/150,261 dated Dec. 28, 2010. |
Interview Summary corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 12/150,261 dated Sep. 21, 2011. |
Interview Summary corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 12/150,261 dated Jun. 12, 2012. |
Interview Summary corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 12/319,149 dated Oct. 17, 2011. |
Interview Summary corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 12/319,149 dated Jun. 15, 2012. |
Interview Summary corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 12/319,150 dated Sep. 23, 2011. |
Interview Summary corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 12/319,150 dated Sep. 6, 2013. |
Interview Summary corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 12/322,347 dated Sep. 21, 2011. |
Interview Summary corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 12/508,233 dated Apr. 26, 2012. |
Interview Summary corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 13/722,323 dated Jan. 22, 2016. |
Interview Summary corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 13/682,160 dated Oct. 28, 2016. |
Interview Summary corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 14/946,169 dated Nov. 8, 2018. |
Kerns, “What's the Difference Between Batteries and Capacitors?” Machine Design, Batteries/Power Supplies, pp. 1-4 (May 11, 2015). |
Kipp, “Plastic Material Data Sheets,” MatWeb (2004) (5 pages). |
Machine Translation of JP 2005-103902, USUI, Apr. 2005. |
Notice of Allowance corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 11/528,741 dated Oct. 28, 2011. |
Notice of Allowance corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 12/150,168 dated Nov. 25, 2013. |
Notice of Allowance corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 13/157,876 dated Nov. 12, 2015. |
Notice of Allowance corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 12/319,150 dated Feb. 12, 2016. |
Notice of Allowance corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 13/523,462 dated May 16, 2016. |
Notice of Allowance corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 13/722,323 dated Nov. 18, 2016. |
Notice of Allowance corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 14/304,101 dated Jul. 10, 2017. |
Notice of Allowance corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 15/042,615 dated Nov. 21, 2018. |
Notice of Decision from Post-Prosectuion Pilot Program (P3) Conference corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 12/957,947 dated Dec. 14, 2016. |
Office Action corresponding to European Patent Application No. 10 193 414.9-1303 dated Oct. 29, 2014. |
Office Action corresponding to New Zealand Patent Application No. 626181 dated Jun. 18, 2014. |
Office Action corresponding to United Kingdom Patent Application No. GB1020302.4 dated Jul. 2, 2014. |
Office Action corresponding to United Kingdom Patent Application No. GB1020302.4 dated Dec. 11, 2014. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 11/801,609 dated Sep. 15, 2009. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 11/801,609 dated Feb. 5, 2010. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 12/150,261 dated Oct. 27, 2009. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 12/319,149 dated Oct. 15, 2009. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 11/528,741 dated Mar. 30, 2010. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 12/150,261 dated Jul. 7, 2010. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 12/319,149 dated Jul. 7, 2010. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 11/801,609 dated Jul. 15, 2010. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 12/322,347 dated Sep. 14, 2010. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 12/319,150 dated Oct. 15, 2010. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 11/528,741 dated Jan. 4, 2011. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 12/508,233 dated Mar. 9, 2011. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 12/150,168 dated Feb. 16, 2011. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 12/319,149 dated Mar. 16, 2011. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 12/319,149 dated Mar. 22, 2011. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 12/154,662 dated Mar. 29, 2011. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 12/319,150 dated Apr. 26, 2011. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 11/528,741 dated May 18, 2011. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 12/154,662 dated Jun. 20, 2011. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 12/154,662 dated Aug. 18, 2011. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 12/154,662 dated Jan. 18, 2012. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 12/512,361 dated Aug. 31, 2011. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 12/150,168 dated Sep. 23, 2011. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 12/322,347 dated Oct. 26, 2011. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 12/319,150 dated Nov. 4, 2011. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 12/508,233 dated Nov. 23, 2011. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 12/508,233 dated Jun. 6, 2012. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 12/319,149 dated Dec. 2, 2011. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 12/957,947 dated Jan. 17, 2012. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 11/801,609 dated Jan. 30, 2012. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 12/150,261 dated Jan. 31, 2012. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 12/426,496 dated Feb. 7, 2012. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 12/512,361 dated May 2, 2012. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 12/322,347 dated May 15, 2012. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 12/150,168 dated Aug. 14, 2012. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 12/319,149 dated Aug. 27, 2012. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 12/957,947 dated Sep. 25, 2012. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 12/319,150 dated Mar. 14, 2013. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 12/150,168 dated Apr. 26, 2013. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 12/957,947 dated Jul. 24, 2013. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 13/157,876 dated Nov. 19, 2013. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 11/801,609 dated Nov. 29, 2013. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 13/722,323 dated Mar. 27, 2014. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 12/957,947 dated Apr. 24, 2014. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 13/157,876 dated Jun. 2, 2014. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 12/322,347 dated Aug. 1, 2014. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 11/801,609 dated Sep. 24, 2014. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 13/722,323 dated Jan. 7, 2015. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 12/957,947 dated Jan. 7, 2015. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 13/523,462 dated Jan. 30, 2015. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 13/157,876 dated Mar. 3, 2015. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 12/322,347 dated May 20, 2015. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 11/801,609 dated Jun. 12, 2015. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 13/682,160 dated Jun. 15, 2015. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 13/722,323 dated Jul. 17, 2015. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 12/319,150 dated Jul. 22, 2015. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 12/957,947 dated Sep. 16, 2015. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 13/523,462 dated Sep. 21, 2015. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 14/612,175 dated Dec. 9, 2015. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 13/682,160 dated Jan. 29, 2016. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 11/801,609 dated Feb. 2, 2016. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 12/322,347 dated Feb. 18, 2016. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 12/957,947 dated Mar. 31, 2016. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 13/722,323 dated May 3, 2016. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 13/682,160 dated Jun. 30, 2016. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 14/304,101 dated Jun. 30, 2016. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 14/612,175 dated Aug. 5, 2016. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 12/322,347 dated Aug. 17, 2016. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 12/957,947 dated Sep. 26, 2016. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 11/801,609 dated Nov. 16, 2016. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 14/304,101 dated Dec. 9, 2016. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 13/682,160 dated Mar. 2, 2017. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 11/801,609 dated Jun. 14, 2017. |
Office Action corresponding to European Patent Application No. 10193414.9 dated May 16, 2017. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 12/957,947 dated Sep. 19, 2017. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 13/682,160 dated Dec. 12, 2017. |
Office Action (Restriction Requirement) corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 14/946,169 dated Jan. 4, 2018. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 12/322,347 dated Mar. 30, 2018. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 14/612,175 dated Mar. 30, 2018. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 15/042,615 dated Mar. 30, 2018. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 12/957,947 dated May 7, 2018. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 13/682,160 dated Jul. 25, 2018. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 14/946,169 dated Aug. 16, 2018. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 12/322,347 dated Oct. 25, 2018. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 14/612,175 dated Nov. 2, 2018. |
Office Action (Examiner's Answer) corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 12/957,947 dated Jan. 4, 2019. |
Petrie, “Handbook of Adhesives and Sealants,” 2nd Edition. McGraw-Hill: New York, New York. pp. 465-466 (2007). |
Pish, “Ragone Plot,” 2016 Advisory Panel Energy Storage, Center for Electromechanics, The University of Texas at Austin https://utw10356.utweb.utexas.edu/sites/default/files/Pish.pdf, p. 1, (May 10, 2016). |
“Polymer Blend,” IUPAC Compendium of Chemical Terminology. 2nd Edition, p. 1 (1997). |
“Polybutylene terephthalate,” Britannica Online Encyclopedia. pp. 1-3 (Accessed on Sep. 7, 2011) <http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/468341/polybutylene-terephthalate-PBT>. |
“Polybutylene terephthalate (PBT),” 1 page <http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/468341/polybutylene-terephthalate-PBT> (Accessed on Jun. 13, 2012). |
“Polymer Materials Selection for Radiation-Sterilized Products,” pp. 1-3 <http://www.mddionline.com/article/polymer-materials-selection-radiation-sterilized-products> dated Feb. 1, 2000. |
Polypropyolene RB707CF, Borealis AG, Edition 5, pp. 1-3 (Nov. 20, 2013). |
“Ragone Chart,” Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ragone_chart, pp. 1-2, downloaded Dec. 21, 2016. |
Response to the Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings dated Nov. 15, 2017 corresponding to European Patent Application No. 12192895.6 dated Mar. 27, 2018. |
Scherson et al., “Batteries and Electrochemical Capacitors,” The Electricochemical Society Interface, pp. 17-22 (2006). |
Search Report corresponding to French Patent Application No. 1059997 dated Jan. 16, 2012. |
Summons to attend oral proceedings pursuant to Rule 115(1) EPC corresponding to European Patent Application Serial No. 12192895.6 dated Nov. 15, 2017. |
Unisource—Moisture Barrier & Oxygen Barrier Transmission Rates; 1 page, <http://www.unisourcelink.com/packaging/pdf/MoistureBarrier.pdf> (Retrieved on Jan. 10, 2012). |
Office Action (Restriction Requirement) corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 16/266,567 dated Dec. 30, 2020. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 12/322,347 dated Jan. 19, 2021. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 16/227,191 dated Mar. 9, 2021. |
Office Action corresponding to New Zealand Patent Application No. 749501 dated Mar. 11, 2021. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 16/266,567 dated Apr. 1, 2021. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 14/612,175 dated May 5, 2021. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 12/322,347 dated Jun. 15, 2021. |
Machine Translation of JP H06-322140, 7 pages (Year: 1994). |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 16/227,191 dated Sep. 24, 2021. |
Office Action corresponding to New Zealand Patent Application No. 749501 dated Oct. 27, 2021. |
Office Action corresponding to Turkish Patent Application No. 2018/19787 dated Nov. 5, 2021. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 12/322,347 dated Nov. 19, 2021. |
Office Action (Restriction Requirement) corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 16/266,567 dated Jan. 6, 2022. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 14/612,175 dated Feb. 18, 2022. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 14/946,169 dated Apr. 4, 2022. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 16/227,191 dated Apr. 21, 2022. |
PELESTAT 300, “Polymer-Alloy Type Permanent Antistatic Agent for Polyolefin,” Harwick Standard Distribution Corporation, harwick.com/files/tds/PELESTAT_300.PDF. 8 pages, dated Apr. 1, 2010. |
IonPhasE IPE U1, Technical Data Sheet, IonPhasE Oy, www.uni-trading.com/sub/support/tds.msds/additive/IPE/TDS/IPE-U1%20TDS(EN).pdf, 1 page (2016). |
Office Action corresponding to Czech Patent Application No. PV 2018-736 dated May 30, 2022 [Machine Translation]. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 16/266,567 dated Jul. 22, 2022. |
Notice of Allowance corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 14/946,169 dated Feb. 23, 2023. |
Notice of Allowability corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 14/946,169 dated Mar. 2, 2023. |
Interview Summary corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 16/227,191 dated Mar. 10, 2023. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 16/227,191 dated May 5, 2023. |
Office Action with machine translation corresponding to Turkish Application No. 2018/19787 dated Jul. 13, 2023. |
Office Action corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 16/266,567 dated Aug. 3, 2023. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190193378 A1 | Jun 2019 | US |