Fiber cement composite materials using bleached cellulose fibers

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 7942964
  • Patent Number
    7,942,964
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, January 7, 2004
    20 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, May 17, 2011
    13 years ago
Abstract
A fiber cement composite material that incorporates a blend of bleached and unbleached cellulose fibers as a partial or complete substitute for premium grade cellulose pulp is provided. Bleached standard grade cellulose fibers are used in conjunction with unbleached, standard grade cellulose fibers to provide a fiber cement composite product having substantially equal or even superior flexibility and strength as an equivalent fiber cement composite material reinforced by premium grade, unbleached cellulose fibers. A synergistic combination of bleached and unbleached standard grade cellulose fibers to produce a composite material with the desired properties previously achievable only through the use of premium grade cellulose pulp.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention


This invention relates generally to a fiber-reinforced composite material, and more particularly to a fiber cement building material utilizing a blend of bleached and unbleached cellulose fibers as reinforcing fibers, including formulations, methods of manufacture, and final products.


2. Description of the Related Art


Fiber-reinforced composite materials have been used to form various building products such as building sheets, panels, planks and roofing material. The reinforcement fibers used in these building products typically include natural and synthetic fibers such as metal fibers, glass fibers, asbestos fibers, and cellulose fibers such as those described in Australian Patent No. 515151 and U.S. Pat. No. 6,030,447, which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety. Presently, cellulose fiber is one of the preferred fibers for most commercial building material applications because it is an effective, low cost, and recyclable natural product that is compatible with most conventional fiber cement manufacturing processes such as refining and autoclaving.


The performance characteristics of most cellulose fiber reinforced building materials are highly dependent on the quality and characteristic of the cellulose fibers used. In particular, the species and grade of cellulose fibers can have a significant impact on the flexibility and strength of the building material. For example, unbleached, premium grade cellulose fibers derived from Pinus Radiata are known to provide the resulting product with higher strength because these fibers typically have longer length and favorable strength-related properties. Conversely, unbleached, standard grade cellulose fibers derived from a variety of other commonly available wood species such as Douglas fir, hemlock, spruce, white fir, southern pine, and redwood are generally shorter and/or weaker, imparting lower strength and flexibility to the product.


However, there are several disadvantages associated with the use of premium grade cellulose fibers. First, the source of premium grade cellulose pulp has been largely limited to one particular species of wood. The cost of such fibers is also significantly higher than other grades of unbleached pulp. Moreover, limited availability of premium grade pulp can place severe constraints on fiber cement manufacturing operations and ultimately drive up the cost of the product. As such, product manufacturers typically incorporate both premium grade and standard grade unbleached pulps in fiber-cement composite materials in order to provide a final product with adequate strength and flexibility at minimum cost.


Even so, unbleached standard grade Kraft pulps typically used for fiber cement are considered specialty grades of cellulose pulp and are sold at a premium price over other types of cellulose pulp commonly used in paper, linerboard or other cellulose pulp based products.


Hence from the foregoing, it will be appreciated that there is a need for a readily available, less costly substitute for premium grade cellulose fibers for use in the manufacturing of fiber cement composite materials. To this end, there is a particular need for a cellulose fiber that will provide fiber cement composite materials with substantially equal if not improved strength, flexibility and other physical properties as compared to equivalent composite materials reinforced with premium grade cellulose fibers.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The aforementioned needs are satisfied by the preferred embodiments of the present invention, which in certain embodiments disclose the novel concept of using a blend of bleached and unbleached standard grade cellulose fibers as a partial or complete substitute for premium grade cellulose fibers in the manufacture of fiber cement reinforced composite materials.


The terms “bleached cellulose fibers,” “bleached fibers” and “bleached cellulose pulp” used herein refer to cellulose fibers that have been treated with a bleaching agent such as hydrogen peroxide, sodium hypochlorite, chlorine, and/or chlorine dioxide. The bleached cellulose fibers may encompass pulp derived from a variety of species of wood including but not limited to Douglas fir, hemlock, P. Radiata pine, white fir, spruce, southern yellow pine, kenaf, and redwood. The bleached cellulose fibers can be prepared by Kraft, Sulfite, or other pulping methods.


The terms “premium grade cellulose fibers,” “premium grade fibers” and “premium grade cellulose pulp” used herein refer to cellulose fibers derived from P. Radiata pines having an average fiber length of more than about 1.5 mm and an average tensile strength of more than about 12.5 km by TAPPI method T231. The terms “standard grade cellulose fibers,” “standard grade fibers” and “standard grade cellulose pulp” used herein refer to cellulose fibers derived from a variety of commonly available wood species such as Douglas fir, hemlock, spruce, white fir, southern pine, kenaf, and redwood, excluding P. Radiata pines. The term “standard grade cellulose fibers” can also be used to refer to “fiber cement grade” cellulose fibers known in the art.


In one aspect, the preferred embodiments of the present invention provide a composite material comprising a cementitious matrix and cellulose fibers incorporated into the cementitious matrix, wherein the cellulose fibers comprise a blend of bleached and unbleached cellulose fibers. In one embodiment, the bleached cellulose fibers comprise less than about 50%, preferably between about 5%-25%, of the total cellulose fibers incorporated into the matrix. In another embodiment, the bleached cellulose fibers have a Kappa number of less than or equal to about 10.


The bleached cellulose fibers are preferably standard grade fibers derived from species selected from the group consisting of Douglas fir, hemlock, spruce, southern pines, and redwood. In certain embodiments, the bleached cellulose fibers can also be premium grade fibers derived from P. Radiata pine. The unbleached cellulose fibers are preferably standard grade fibers comprising species selected from the group consisting of Douglas fir, hemlock, white fir, spruce, southern pine and redwood. In one embodiment, the bleached and unbleached cellulose fibers combined comprise about 0.5%-20% by weight of the composite material. In another embodiment, the bleached and unbleached cellulose fibers comprise standard grade cellulose fibers having an average fiber length of between about 1 mm to 3.5 mm. Preferably, the modulus of rupture (MOR) and toughness energy of the composite material reinforced with the blend of bleached and unbleached fibers are substantially equal to or greater than that of an equivalent material reinforced with unbleached, premium grade cellulose fibers.


In another aspect, the preferred embodiments of the present invention provide a method of manufacturing a fiber-reinforced cement composite material. The method comprises providing bleached and unbleached cellulose fibers; mixing the bleached and unbleached cellulose fibers with a cementitious binder to form a fiber cement mixture; forming the fiber cement mixture into a fiber cement article of a pre-selected shape and size; and curing the fiber cement article. In one embodiment, the step of providing the bleached cellulose fibers comprises treating standard grade cellulose fibers with a bleaching agent. Preferably, the bleached cellulose fibers have an average Kappa number of less than or equal to about 10. In another embodiment, providing the unbleached cellulose fibers comprises providing unbleached, standard grade cellulose fibers. Preferably, the bleached and unbleached cellulose fibers are mixed in pre-selected proportions to provide the composite material with pre-determined physical properties. In one embodiment, the pre-selected proportion is formulated to provide the composite material with a modulus of rupture (MOR) that is substantially equal to or greater than the MOR of an equivalent composite material reinforced with only premium grade cellulose fibers.


In yet another aspect, the preferred embodiments of the present invention provide a composite building material comprising a cementitious matrix and a blend of cellulose fibers. Preferably, the blend of cellulose fibers comprises bleached and unbleached cellulose fibers and is selected to provide the building material with pre-determined flexibility and strength. In one embodiment, the blend of cellulose fibers is selected to provide the building material with flexibility and tensile strength that are substantially equal or superior to that of an equivalent building material reinforced with only premium-grade cellulose fibers. In another embodiment, the blend of cellulose fibers is selected to provide the building material with flexibility and tensile strength that are substantially equal or superior to the flexibility and strength of an equivalent building material reinforced with only bleached cellulose fibers. Preferably, the blend of cellulose fibers comprises less than about 50%, more preferably between about 5%-25%, bleached cellulose fibers. Moreover, the blend of cellulose fibers preferably does not include premium grade cellulose fibers.


In yet another aspect, the preferred embodiments of the present invention provide a composite material comprising a cementitious matrix, a first portion of cellulose fibers having a Kappa number of less than or equal to about 10 and a second portion of standard grade cellulose fibers having a Kappa number of greater than about 10. In one embodiment, the first portion of cellulose fibers comprises premium grade cellulose fibers. In another embodiment, the first portion of the cellulose fibers comprises less than about 50% by weight of the total amount of the two portions of the cellulose fibers combined. Advantageously, the bleached, standard grade cellulose fibers combine synergistically with the unbleached, standard grade fibers in the cementitious matrix, resulting in a composite material with substantially equal or improved strength and flexibility when compared with equivalent composite materials formed with only premium grade cellulose fibers.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 illustrates the process flow of a preferred method of forming a fiber cement composite material reinforced with a blend of bleached and unbleached cellulose fibers;



FIG. 2 illustrates the relationship between the modulus of rupture (MOR) of a fiber-cement composite material and varying amounts of bleached fibers incorporated in the material;



FIG. 3 illustrates the relationship between strain of the fiber-cement composite material and varying amounts of bleached fibers incorporated in the material;



FIG. 4 illustrates the relationship between toughness of the fiber-cement composite material and varying amounts of bleached fibers incorporated in the material.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

Certain preferred embodiments of the present invention describe the use of a blend of bleached and unbleached cellulose fibers as reinforcement fibers in cementitious composite materials. In some preferred embodiments, the bleached and unbleached fibers are both standard grade fibers that in combination can serve as a partial or complete substitute for the more expensive and less abundant premium grade cellulose fibers. These embodiments encompass not only the composite materials formed with the blend of bleached and unbleached fibers, but also the formulation and methods of manufacture of the composite materials.


Bleached cellulose fibers have been used almost exclusively in the paper-making industry to provide white papers and paperboards. It is also widely recognized that the bleaching process degrades the fiber structure and weakens its reinforcing capabilities, making bleached fibers undesirable for fiber cement composite material applications. Such belief has been well documented in various technical publications. For example, in U.S. Pat. No. 4,985,119 entitled “CELLULOSE FIBER-REINFORCED STRUCTURE”, it indicates that “such bleaching [of the fibers] is not preferred due to cost and fiber degradation.” Accordingly, it is against conventional wisdom to use bleached fibers as a reinforcing fiber for fiber cement composite materials because bleached fibers are generally believed to produce a fiber cement product that is weaker and more brittle.


However, contrary to conventional wisdom, Applicant has found that bleached cellulose fibers when used in proper proportions with unbleached, standard grade cellulose fibers can result in a fiber cement composite material with substantially equal or even superior flexibility, strength, and other physical properties when compared to an equivalent composite material reinforced by the more costly and less abundant premium grade cellulose fibers. It has been surprisingly found that proper blends of the selected bleached fibers and unbleached standard grade pulp give the final product a good balance of strength and flexibility.


Without wishing to be bound by a specific theory, Applicant believes that the bleached cellulose fibers have reduced lignin content and increased number of reactive sites on the fiber surface as compared with equivalent cellulose fibers not treated with a bleaching agent. Applicant believes that this allows improved bonding of the fibers with the cementitious matrix and helps overcome the shorter fiber length and fiber brittleness normally associated with standard grade cellulose pulps. When used in predetermined amounts that complement the properties of unbleached pulp, Applicant has surprisingly found that bleached cellulose pulps are indeed very effective reinforcement fibers for cement composites.


One embodiment of the present invention provides a fiber cement composite material that incorporates bleached cellulose fibers in combination with unbleached standard grade cellulose fibers as reinforcing fibers. In one embodiment, the individual fiber length is between about 1 mm to 3.5 mm. Preferably, the bleached and unbleached fibers are used as a partial or complete substitute for the premium grade cellulose fibers that are commonly used in most fiber cement composite materials. The bleached cellulose fibers are preferably fibers treated with a bleaching agent such as hydrogen peroxide, sodium hypochlorite, or the like to reduce the lignin content of the fibers to a Kappa number of less than or equal to about 10. In one embodiment, the bleached fibers can comprise standard grade cellulose pulp of species including but not limited to Douglas fir, hemlock, white fir, spruce, kenaf, southern pines and redwood. Moreover, it will be appreciated that the preferred embodiments of the present invention are not limited to the use of bleached cellulose fibers as a substitute for premium grade fibers, but also include the use of all chemically treated fibers with substantially reduced lignin content and increased number of reaction sites on the fiber surface. Without wishing to be bound by theory, it is believed that the exposed reaction sites will increase the number of fiber-to-fiber and fiber-to-cement bonding in the matrix, which in turn imparts strength to the material comparable to that achieved by stronger fibers.


In one embodiment, the bleached cellulose fibers are incorporated in a fiber cement matrix in combination with unbleached, standard grade pulp. The bleached fibers preferably comprise less than about 50%, more preferably between about 5%-25%, of the total cellulose fibers incorporated into the matrix. The combination of bleached cellulose fibers and unbleached standard grade cellulose pulp can be used in a variety of composite materials all having different proportions of cementitious binder, aggregate, and cellulose fibers.


Most of the embodiments described herein can be encompassed by the following formulation:

    • about 10%-80% cementitious binder (which, in certain embodiments, is selected from the group consisting of high alumina cement, lime, high phosphate cement, ground granulated blast furnace slag cement, and mixtures thereof);
    • about 20%-80% aggregate (which, in certain embodiments, is selected from group consisting of ground silica, amorphous silica, micro silica, geothermal silica, diatomaceous earth, coal combustion fly ash, blast furnace slag, granulated slag, steel slag, mineral oxides, mineral hydroxides, clays, magnasite or dolomite, metal oxides and hydroxide, polymeric beads, and mixtures thereof);
    • about 0.5%-20% cellulose fibers as comprising a combination of bleached standard grade cellulose fibers and unbleached standard grade cellulose fibers, and/or natural inorganic fibers, and/or synthetic fibers, wherein less than about 50% of the total cellulose fibers is bleached fibers;
    • about 0%-80% density modifiers (which, in certain embodiments, is selected from the group consisting of plastic materials, expanded polystyrene or other foamed polymer materials, glass and ceramic materials, calcium silicate hydrates, microspheres and volcano ashes including perlite, pumice, shirasu basalt, zeolites in expanded forms, and mixtures thereof); and
    • about 0%-10% additives (which, in certain embodiments, is selected from the group consisting of viscosity modifiers, fire retardants, waterproofing agents, silica fume, geothermal silica, thickeners, pigments, colorants, plasticizers, dispersants, forming agents, flocculent, drainage aids, wet and dry strength aids, silicone materials, aluminum powder, clay, kaolin, alumina trihydrate, mica, metakaolin, calcium carbonate, wollastonite, polymeric resin emulsion, and mixtures thereof).



FIG. 1 provides a schematic illustration of a process flow 100 of manufacturing a fiber cement composite material of one embodiment of the present invention. As shown in FIG. 1, the process 100 begins with Step 102, which comprises providing bleached and unbleached standard grade cellulose fibers. In one embodiment, the bleached cellulose fibers are less than about 50% of the combined weight of the bleached and unbleached fibers. In another embodiment, Step 102 comprises treating standard grade cellulose fibers with a bleaching agent to form bleached fibers having a Kappa number of less than about 10. The process 100 continues with Step 104, which comprises mixing the bleached and unbleached cellulose fibers with a cementitious binder and other ingredients to form a fiber cement mixture. Subsequently, the fiber cement mixture is formed into a fiber cement article of a pre-selected shape and size in Step 106. The fiber cement article is then cured to form the fiber cement reinforced composite building material in Step 108.


The advantages of incorporating a blend of bleached and unbleached standard grade cellulose fibers in a fiber cement composite matrix are numerous. They include the following:

    • resulting composite material achieves a desired balance of strength and flexibility that is normally achievable only through incorporation of premium grade cellulose fibers;
    • resulting composite material utilizes bleached cellulose fibers that can be obtained from a variety of commonly available wood species including but not limited to Douglas fir, hemlock, spruce, and redwood;
    • bleached fibers require less energy to refine, reducing the product cost of the resulting composite material;


Example 1

Table 1 compares the mechanical properties of the fiber-reinforced cement composite materials made with equivalent formulations in which Formulation A incorporates bleached cellulose fibers and Formulation B incorporates premium cellulose fibers. The materials were produced using a Hatschek machine and the results are based on many samples collected over 1 week of production. It can be seen that formulations containing about 13% bleached pulp resulted in products with similar mechanical properties as compared with products based on an equivalent formulation containing about 13% premium fiber of P. Radiata pine.









TABLE 1







Property Comparisons









Formulations









Averaged Physical
A
B


Properties
13% bleached pulp
13% premium Radiata pine












MOR (MPa)
10.39
10.29


Dry Density (Kg/m3)
1.25
1.25


Strain (μm/m)
12444
11961


Toughness (KJ/m3)
10.39
10.99









The base formulation for A and B is: about 35% Portland cement, about 57% ground silica and about 8% cellulose pulp. About 13% of the Formulation A cellulose pulp is bleached pulp and about 13% of the Formulation B cellulose pulp is Radiata pine. The remainder of the pulp for both formulations is standard grade Douglas fir Kraft pulp. Mechanical properties such as the modulus of rupture (MOR), strain, and toughness, are tested by three-point bending under the wet condition in accordance with ASTM (American Standard Test Method) C1185-98a entitled “Standard Test Methods for Sampling and Testing Non-Asbestos Fiber-Cement Flat Sheet, Roofing and Siding Shingles, and Clapboards.”


Example 2

Specimens of fiber cement composite materials were made in accordance with Formulations C and D as shown in Table 2 below. Formulation C incorporated a blend of bleached and unbleached cellulose fibers. The fiber blend contained about 20% bleached fibers and about 80% unbleached fibers. Formulation D was the control, which utilized all unbleached fibers. It will be appreciated that the fiber cement formulations were selected for comparison purposes only and that a variety of other formulations can be used without departing from the scope of the present invention.


The oven dry densities of the specimens made in accordance with Formulations C and D were each about 1.25 g/cm3. The bleached fibers were Kraft pulp from Douglas fir with brightness of about 88, a Kappa number of 0 to 1 by TAPPI method T236 and an average fiber length of about 2.4 mm. The unbleached fibers were conventional standard grade cellulose fibers with an average fiber length of about 2.6 mm and a Kappa number of 26. Both the bleached and unbleached fibers were refined to about 450 CSF (Canadian Standard Freeness) measured by TAPPI method T227.









TABLE 2







Formulations for Table 3 Test Results












Hydraulic






Binder


Fiber


Formulation
Portland
Aggregate
Fiber
Unbleached


Identification
Cement
Silica
Bleached Fiber
Fiber





C
35%
57%
1.6%
6.4%


D
35%
57%
0.0%
8.0%









Table 3 below provides an illustrative comparison of various mechanical and physical properties of fiber cement specimens made in accordance with formulations that incorporate a blend of bleached and unbleached cellulose fibers (Formulation C) and those that use conventional, unbleached cellulose fibers (Formulation D). The modulus of rupture (MOR), strain, and toughness are tested by three-point bending under the wet condition in accordance with ASTM (American Standard Test Method) C1185-98a entitled “Standard Test Methods for Sampling and Testing Non-Asbestos Fiber-Cement Flat Sheet, Roofing and Siding Shingles, and Clapboards.”









TABLE 3







Property Comparison of Fiber Reinforced Cement Composite


Materials With and Without Bleached Cellulose Fibers









Formulations










C
D


Physical Properties
(with 20% bleached fiber)
(no bleached fiber)












MOR (MPa)
11.23
11.09


Dry Density (Kg/m3)
1.25
1.25


Strain (μm/m)
13491
14292


Toughness (KJ/m3)
19.26
20.62









As shown in Table 3, key mechanical properties such as modulus of rupture (MOR) and ultimate strain are generally the same or slightly higher for specimens made with a blend of the bleached and unbleached fibers in accordance with Formulations C when compared to specimens made in accordance with Formulation D, the control formulation without bleached fibers. An equivalent formulation is herein defined as one in which the weight of unbleached cellulose fibers are displaced by an equivalent weight of bleached cellulose fibers. It will be appreciated that these are exemplifying results. By varying the proportional composition of bleached fibers, it will be appreciated that the physical and mechanical properties, such as MOR and strain, etc., of the final products can be changed to meet specific application needs.



FIGS. 2 to 4 illustrate the relationship between certain mechanical properties (MOR, strain and toughness) of the fiber-cement products and the percentage of bleached fibers in a fiber blend. It can be seen that percentage of bleached fibers is important for the fiber-cement composite materials to have a balanced properties of MOR, strain and toughness. Excessive bleached fibers present in the blend can adversely affect certain properties. For example, MOR will increase but the strain and toughness will decrease as the percentage of bleached fibers increases. In certain embodiments, to ensure good MOR as well as good strain and toughness, maximum proportions of bleached fibers shall not exceed 40% of the total fibers as shown in FIGS. 2 to 4.


Although the foregoing description of the preferred embodiments of the present invention has shown, described and pointed out the fundamental novel features of the invention, it will be understood that various omissions, substitutions, and changes in the form of the detail of the apparatus as illustrated as well as the uses thereof, may be made by those skilled in the art, without departing from the spirit of the invention. Consequently, the scope of the invention should not be limited to the foregoing discussions, but should be defined by the claims presented in the subsequently filed utility patent application.

Claims
  • 1. A composite material, comprising: a cementitious matrix; andcellulose fibers incorporated into the cementitious matrix, wherein the cellulose fibers comprise a blend of bleached and unbleached cellulose fibers and wherein the bleached cellulose fibers comprise between about 10 and 17 weight percent of the total cellulose fibers incorporated into the matrix.
  • 2. The composite material of claim 1, wherein the bleached cellulose fibers have an average Kappa number of less than or equal to about 10.
  • 3. The composite material of claim 1, wherein the bleached cellulose fibers comprise fibers from species selected from the group consisting of Douglas fir, hemlock, spruce, southern yellow pines, kenaf and redwood.
  • 4. The composite material of claim 1, wherein the bleached cellulose fibers comprise fibers of P. Radiata pine.
  • 5. The composite material of claim 1, wherein the unbleached cellulose fibers comprise fibers from species selected from the group consisting of Douglass fir, hemlock, white fir, spruce, southern pine, kenaf and redwood.
  • 6. The composite material of claim 1, wherein the bleached and unbleached cellulose fibers comprise about 0.5%-20% by weight of the composite material.
  • 7. The composite material of claim 1, wherein the bleached and unbleached cellulose fibers comprise cellulose fibers having an average fiber length of between about 1 mm to 3.5 mm.
  • 8. The composite material of claim 1, wherein the toughness energy of the composite material is substantially equal to or greater than the toughness energy of an equivalent composite material reinforced with unbleached, premium grade cellulose fibers.
  • 9. A composite material, comprising: a cementitious matrix; andcellulose fibers incorporated into the cementitious matrix, wherein the cellulose fibers comprise a blend of bleached and unbleached cellulose fibers and wherein the bleached cellulose fibers comprise between about 10 and 14weight percent of the total cellulose fibers incorporated into the matrix, wherein the modulus of rupture of the composite material is greater than about 8 MPa.
  • 10. A composite material, consisting essentially of: 10% to 80% weight percent cementitious binder selected from the group consisting of high alumina cement, lime, high phosphate cement, ground granulated blast surface slag cement, and mixtures thereof;20% to 80% weight percent aggregate selected from the group consisting of ground silica, amorphous silica, micro silica, geothermal silica, diatomaceous earth, coal combustion fly ash, blast furnace slag, granulated slag, steel slag, mineral oxides, mineral hydroxides, clays, magnasite or dolomite, metal oxides and hydroxide, polymeric beads, and mixtures thereof;0%-80% density modifiers selected from the group consisting of plastic materials, expanded polystyrene or other foamed polymer materials, glass and ceramic materials, microspheres and volcano ashes including perlite, pumice, shirasu basalt, zeolites in expanded forms, and mixtures thereof;0%-10% additives selected from the group consisting of viscosity modifiers, fire retardants, waterproofing agents, silica fume, geothermal silica, thickeners, pigments, colorants, plasticizers, dispersants, forming agents, flocculent, drainage aids, wet and dry strength aids, silicone materials, aluminum powder, clay, kaolin, alumina trihydrate, mica, metakaolin, calcium carbonate, wollastonite, polymeric resin emulsion, and mixtures thereof; andcellulose fibers incorporated into the cementitious matrix comprising the cementitious binder and aggregate, wherein the cellulose fibers comprise a blend of bleached and unbleached cellulose fibers and wherein the bleached cellulose fibers comprise between about 10 and 17 weight percent of the total cellulose fibers incorporated into the matrix.
  • 11. The composite material of claim 10, wherein the bleached fibers comprise between 12 and 14 weight percent of the total cellulose fibers incorporated into the matrix.
  • 12. The composite material of claim 10, wherein the cementitious binder is between 30 and 40 weight percent Portland cement and the aggregate consists essentially of 50 to 60 weight percent ground silica.
  • 13. The composite material of claim 1, wherein the modulus of rupture (MOR) of the composite material is substantially equal to or greater than the MOR of an equivalent composite material reinforced with unbleached, premium grade cellulose fibers.
  • 14. The composite material of claim 10, wherein the bleached fibers comprise about 15 weight percent of the total cellulose fibers incorporated into the matrix.
RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/439,040, filed Jan. 9, 2003, the entirety of which is hereby incorporated by reference.

US Referenced Citations (163)
Number Name Date Kind
1571048 Garrow Jan 1926 A
1914163 Randall Jun 1933 A
2024689 Walter et al. Dec 1935 A
2030383 Luth et al. Feb 1936 A
2054854 Dreyfus Sep 1936 A
2156308 Schuh May 1939 A
2156311 Schuh May 1939 A
2175568 Haustein Oct 1939 A
2175569 Kennedy Oct 1939 A
2176668 Housfoin Oct 1939 A
2377484 Elmendorf Jun 1945 A
2645576 Bate et al. Jul 1953 A
2880101 Ulfstedt Mar 1959 A
3264125 Bourlin Aug 1966 A
3716386 Kempster Feb 1973 A
3748100 Forseth Jul 1973 A
3748160 Carbajal Jul 1973 A
3753749 Nutt Aug 1973 A
3836412 Boustany Sep 1974 A
3843380 Beyn Oct 1974 A
3865779 Oya et al. Feb 1975 A
3918981 Long Nov 1975 A
3931069 Lundin Jan 1976 A
3969567 Occleshaw et al. Jul 1976 A
3998944 Long Dec 1976 A
4003752 Isohata et al. Jan 1977 A
4013480 Chumbley et al. Mar 1977 A
4088804 Cornwell et al. May 1978 A
4098701 Burrill et al. Jul 1978 A
4102697 Fukuba et al. Jul 1978 A
4138313 Hillstrom et al. Feb 1979 A
4177176 Burrill et al. Dec 1979 A
4225383 McReynolds Sep 1980 A
4258090 Moraru Mar 1981 A
4274913 Kikuiri et al. Jun 1981 A
4306911 Gordon et al. Dec 1981 A
4351867 Mulvey et al. Sep 1982 A
4406703 Guthrie et al. Sep 1983 A
4428775 Johnson et al. Jan 1984 A
4457785 Hsu et al. Jul 1984 A
4497688 Schaefer Feb 1985 A
4510020 Green et al. Apr 1985 A
4517375 Schmidt May 1985 A
4548676 Johnstone et al. Oct 1985 A
4637860 Harper et al. Jan 1987 A
4643920 McEntee et al. Feb 1987 A
4647505 Blackie et al. Mar 1987 A
4647509 Wallace et al. Mar 1987 A
4647589 Valone Mar 1987 A
4655979 Nakano et al. Apr 1987 A
4659386 Nagai et al. Apr 1987 A
4738723 Frizzell et al. Apr 1988 A
4766113 West et al. Aug 1988 A
4806203 Elton Feb 1989 A
4938958 Niira et al. Jul 1990 A
4944842 Stromberg et al. Jul 1990 A
4971658 Henrickson et al. Nov 1990 A
4985119 Vinson et al. Jan 1991 A
5021093 Beshay Jun 1991 A
5030289 Sattler et al. Jul 1991 A
5047086 Hayakawa et al. Sep 1991 A
5049196 Ries Sep 1991 A
5063260 Chen et al. Nov 1991 A
5102596 Lempfer et al. Apr 1992 A
5118225 Koch et al. Jun 1992 A
5191456 Sutherland et al. Mar 1993 A
5223090 Klungness et al. Jun 1993 A
5236994 Markusch et al. Aug 1993 A
5346541 Goldman et al. Sep 1994 A
5403392 Craig Apr 1995 A
5405498 Pease Apr 1995 A
5415734 Backlund et al. May 1995 A
5421867 Yeager et al. Jun 1995 A
5429717 Bokstrom et al. Jul 1995 A
5432215 Girg et al. Jul 1995 A
5465547 Jakel Nov 1995 A
5472486 Dragner et al. Dec 1995 A
5520779 Bold May 1996 A
5577024 Malkamaki et al. Nov 1996 A
RE35460 Klungness et al. Feb 1997 E
5643359 Souroushian et al. Jul 1997 A
5705542 Roffael et al. Jan 1998 A
5777024 Killilea et al. Jul 1998 A
5786282 Carter et al. Jul 1998 A
5795515 Fischer Aug 1998 A
5804003 Nishizawa Sep 1998 A
5866057 Roffael Feb 1999 A
5871824 Bates Feb 1999 A
5876561 Tsai Mar 1999 A
5897701 Soroushian et al. Apr 1999 A
5945044 Kawai et al. Aug 1999 A
5989335 Soroushian et al. Nov 1999 A
6030447 Naji et al. Feb 2000 A
6045057 Moor et al. Apr 2000 A
6086998 Wihsmann Jul 2000 A
6138430 Van Acoleyen et al. Oct 2000 A
6176920 Murphy et al. Jan 2001 B1
6228215 Hoffman, Jr. May 2001 B1
6245196 Martin et al. Jun 2001 B1
6325853 Hogan et al. Dec 2001 B1
6344654 Lesko Feb 2002 B1
6346146 Duselis et al. Feb 2002 B1
6346165 Markessini et al. Feb 2002 B1
6352952 Jardine et al. Mar 2002 B1
6419788 Wingerson Jul 2002 B1
6475275 Nebesnak et al. Nov 2002 B1
6488762 Shi Dec 2002 B1
6506248 Duselis et al. Jan 2003 B1
6512132 Isoda et al. Jan 2003 B2
6528151 Shah et al. Mar 2003 B1
6562743 Cook et al. May 2003 B1
6572697 Gleeson et al. Jun 2003 B2
6613424 Putt et al. Sep 2003 B1
6676744 Merkley et al. Jan 2004 B2
6676745 Merkley et al. Jan 2004 B2
6719878 Svedman Apr 2004 B1
6749897 Naji et al. Jun 2004 B2
6770576 Cook et al. Aug 2004 B2
6777103 Merkley et al. Aug 2004 B2
6837452 Dezutter et al. Jan 2005 B2
6872246 Merkley et al. Mar 2005 B2
6893751 Naji et al. May 2005 B2
6933038 Nanko et al. Aug 2005 B2
6942726 Cook et al. Sep 2005 B2
7028436 Bezubic, Jr. Apr 2006 B2
7081184 Wester et al. Jul 2006 B2
7226525 Vrbanac et al. Jun 2007 B2
7300546 Jewell et al. Nov 2007 B2
7344593 Luo et al. Mar 2008 B2
7455727 Trevethick Nov 2008 B2
20020007926 Jewell et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020007927 Vahatalo et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020051892 Laks et al. May 2002 A1
20020059886 Merkley et al. May 2002 A1
20020069791 Merkley et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020088584 Merkley et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020112827 Merkley et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020121229 Jardine et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020170466 Naji et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020170467 Naji et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020170468 Luo et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020175126 Naji et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020179219 Naji et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020189499 Naji et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020189500 Naji et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020192510 Naji et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030000424 Naji et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030164119 Naji et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030213568 Wester et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030213569 Wester et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030213570 Vrbanac et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030213572 Vrbanac et al. Nov 2003 A1
20040043217 Dezutter et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040043686 Batdorf Mar 2004 A1
20040132843 Baumgart Jul 2004 A1
20040145078 Merkley et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040168615 Luo Sep 2004 A1
20050016423 Merkley et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050045067 Naji et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050126430 Lightner et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050208287 Naji et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050235883 Merkley et al. Oct 2005 A1
20070077436 Naji et al. Apr 2007 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (101)
Number Date Country
015457 Sep 1998 AR
014046 Nov 1998 AR
014702 Mar 1999 AR
391131 Aug 1990 AT
B1-60 65580 Mar 1981 AU
2002240552 Sep 2002 AU
1177205 Nov 1984 CA
2242749 Feb 1999 CA
2405354 Nov 2001 CA
32972 Feb 1980 CL
2346-01 Sep 2001 CL
2347-01 Sep 2001 CL
2352-01 Sep 2001 CL
2353-01 Sep 2001 CL
461-02 Mar 2002 CL
1032332 Apr 1989 CN
1199116 Nov 1998 CN
1224701 Aug 1999 CN
3037220 Apr 1982 DE
3308917 Sep 1984 DE
3601736 Jan 1986 DE
4316666 Dec 1994 DE
19654836 Jun 1998 DE
0049365 Apr 1982 EP
0056263 Jul 1982 EP
0287962 Apr 1987 EP
263723 Apr 1988 EP
0263723 Apr 1988 EP
0305209 Mar 1989 EP
0 263 723 Feb 1991 EP
484283 Jun 1992 EP
0147429 Jul 1995 EP
1088800 Apr 2000 EP
1052262 Nov 2000 EP
1106236 Jun 2001 EP
1155794 Nov 2001 EP
1346964 Sep 2003 EP
1334076 Aug 2006 EP
2033987 Apr 1993 ES
895184 Jan 1945 FR
1557348 Feb 1969 FR
2611432 Sep 1988 FR
22139 Nov 1901 GB
442098 Feb 1936 GB
449384 Jun 1936 GB
731597 Jun 1955 GB
1003850 Aug 1963 GB
1536663 Dec 1978 GB
2041384 Sep 1980 GB
1604910 Dec 1981 GB
2137977 Oct 1984 GB
2307425 May 1997 GB
55085756 Jun 1980 JP
20374784 Nov 1984 JP
61019900 Jan 1986 JP
63107849 May 1988 JP
01141849 Jun 1989 JP
03016978 Jan 1991 JP
06024821 Aug 1991 JP
0418233 Jun 1992 JP
04182335 Jun 1992 JP
04342746 Nov 1992 JP
5-177625 Jul 1993 JP
05184246 Jul 1993 JP
06144911 May 1994 JP
34109394 Dec 1994 JP
07041592 Feb 1995 JP
07109165 Apr 1995 JP
08 119708 May 1996 JP
2508554 Jun 1996 JP
10095922 Apr 1998 JP
11-010631 Jan 1999 JP
11099512 Apr 1999 JP
2001 240458 Sep 2001 JP
2001316163 Nov 2001 JP
2003335560 Nov 2003 JP
1019950008587 Aug 1995 KR
154782 Dec 1991 PL
240472 Mar 1969 SU
WO 8404765 Dec 1984 WO
WO 9101409 Feb 1991 WO
WO-9520066 Jul 1995 WO
WO 9617996 Jun 1996 WO
9708111 Mar 1997 WO
WO 9731153 Aug 1997 WO
WO 9818855 May 1998 WO
WO 9827027 Jun 1998 WO
WO-9845222 Oct 1998 WO
9935330 Jul 1999 WO
WO 0071336 Nov 2000 WO
0130927 May 2001 WO
WO 0168547 Sep 2001 WO
WO 0181666 Nov 2001 WO
WO 0212623 Feb 2002 WO
WO 0218486 Mar 2002 WO
WO 0228795 Apr 2002 WO
WO 0228796 Apr 2002 WO
WO 0233164 Apr 2002 WO
WO 02070425 Sep 2002 WO
WO 02072499 Sep 2002 WO
WO 2004063113 Jul 2004 WO
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20040168615 A1 Sep 2004 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60439040 Jan 2003 US