FIBER FOR TRIBOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS

Information

  • Patent Application
  • 20180306263
  • Publication Number
    20180306263
  • Date Filed
    October 19, 2016
    7 years ago
  • Date Published
    October 25, 2018
    5 years ago
  • Inventors
    • Kienleitner; Herbert
    • Moser; Carmen
    • Bartlmae; Juergen
    • Segreto; Lorraine
    • Schrittesser; Rudolf
    • Faullant; Peter
    • Schmied; Christian
  • Original Assignees
Abstract
Fiber for tribological applications, with the exception of mineral fibers, comprising at least one solid lubricant, with the exception of graphite, or boated with at least one solid lubricant, with the exception of graphite.
Description

The invention relates to a fiber for tribological applications.


In this context, a fiber generally will be understood as a construct having a thin body in relation to its length.


Fibers, such as metal, ceramic, natural, polymeric fibers, or the like, are a very important functional element in many components, e.g., in friction linings. Due to the fibers' structure, they substantially contribute to mechanical and structural strength, and prevent so-called “hotspots” through good thermal conductivity. In general, fibers can be classified as synthetic fibers, natural fibers as well as recycled fibers from natural and/or synthetic products.


Tribological contacts between a brake disk and its frictional lining predominantly form at the interfaces of the metallic fibers employed. According to the contact-plateau theory, contact plateaus are formed on the surface of brake linings, which protrude from the rest of the lining surface. The actual contact between the friction pair occurs within this contact plateau, which is why the size and composition of such plateaus heavily influence a lining's frictional performance. Here, a distinction is made between primary contact plateaus formed by wear-resistant, harder elements, e.g., fibers or abrasion particles, and secondary plateaus consisting of compressed particles of wear accumulating in front of said primary plateaus and being compressed there.


The use of solid lubricants, e.g., graphite and/or metal sulfide, is considered state of the art in many applications. Solid lubricants in general, and particularly metal sulfide, are used to improve tribological characteristics, including in applications for friction linings, triboplastics, liquid and paste-like lubricants, anti-friction coatings, abrasive bodies, and sintered components. Metal sulfides can achieve reduced wear effects of friction partners, stabilize and modify friction values, and are employed as convenient additives against undesired effects. Undesired effects include picking, scratching, stick-slip phenomena, as well as high and low frequency tribosystem vibrations.


The inventors have found that admixed solid lubricants migrate away from the contact plateaus, e.g., in friction linings, and will only be available in a low extent for the actual contact between friction partners already after short operating times and could therefore only show reduced effectiveness in tribological applications.


It is the object of the invention to provide a fiber allowing for an improvement of tribological component characteristics.


According to the invention, this will be achieved in that the fiber, except for mineral fibers, comprises at least one solid lubricant, excluding graphite, or in that the fiber is surface-treated, particularly coated, preferably sulfidized, with at least one solid lubricant, excluding graphite.


Various methods for sulfidizing comply with the state of the art.


At that, the solid lubricant can either be formed on the fiber surface only, or can be disposed on the fiber surface, or partially or wholly comprises the fiber itself.


By forming fibers according to a method of the invention, superficially or wholly consisting of solid lubricants or being coated therewith, solid lubricants can be provided close to tribological contact plateaus in a direct and targeted manner, which exist within or around primary contact plateaus formed by structuring fibers, and can be maintained within the tribological contact plateau area, as fibrous solid lubricants cannot, or only with considerable difficulty, migrate off while being present in composite fiber structures.


US 2015/0204403 A1 describes a graphite-coated fiber used for improving thermal conductivity. Due to the following reasons, however, graphite may not be used as solid lubricant for this invention.


Contrary to widespread beliefs, the lubricating effect of graphite is no intrinsic characteristic, but is dependent on the presence of vapors or small molecules, such as water. In vacuo or in dry conditions, graphite loses its lubricating effects. In dry conditions with temperatures of more than 160° C., moisture starts to evaporate and the lubricating effect of graphite decreases. Especially in applications for brake linings however, constant friction values across a very wide temperature range are essential. Within the contact zone between brake lining and brake disk, momentary temperatures of more than 800° C. can also be reached. Therefore, only solid lubricants other than graphite may be used for producing a fiber for improving tribological characteristics within the scope of this invention. Using solid lubricants, excluding graphite, for improving tribological characteristics is a decisive aspect of the invention.


The fiber according to the invention may be produced using two different processes, specifically via surface treatment of fibers, chemical or physical application of solid lubricants, with or without binding agents, and via the production of fibers containing at least one solid lubricant.


It has been shown that mineral fibers are not suitable for applications according to the invention, therefore they will be excluded from the scope of this specification.


Suitable fibers therefore include, e.g., cellulose fibers, aramid fibers, plastic fibers, metal fibers, glass fibers, nanofibers, carbon fibers, with the exception of mineral fibers. In other embodiments of the invention, methods for directly producing fibers from solid lubricants comprise laser sintering, melt extraction, machined fiber production, section rolling, as well as spinning processes, etc.


Depending on the field of application, the fiber according to the invention may vary in length or diameter, without limitation.


In another embodiment, the solid lubricant forming the fiber according to the invention or coated thereon may be formed from at least one metal sulfide.


According to another embodiment of the invention, it has been found that in order to be able to achieve an effective tribological effect with said fiber, the percentage of the at least one solid lubricant is at least 3% by weight, preferably at least 4% by weight, especially at least 5% by weight, and most preferably at least 10% by weight.


According to an embodiment of the invention, the fiber may be sulfidized so that, e.g., a metal sulfide is formed on the surface of the fiber acting as solid lubricant.


Another example of an embodiment of the invention may consist of a fiber which is an iron sulfide fiber or a tin-iron sulfide fiber.


In further developments of the invention, the solid lubricant for producing the fiber according to the invention may be provided as a multi-phased metal sulfide.


According to another embodiment of the invention, the solid lubricant for producing the fiber according to the invention may be formed of SnS, SnS2, MOS2, Bi2S3, ZnS, WS2, CuFeS2, FeS, CuS, Cu2S, MnS, Sb2S3, TiS2, sulfides of Cr/Co/Ni, Sn2S3, MoS3, WS3, Fe1-xS, MnS2, Sb2S5, ZrS2, CaS, MgS, sulfides of La, Ce, and multi-phased sulfides of various metals, BN, PTFE, phosphates, oxides, or mixtures thereof, without being limited to the above.


Without limitation, one of the preferred applications for fibers according to the invention is the industry for producing friction linings, specifically the usage in various friction lining types: linings for disk and drum brakes, clutch linings, as well as other brake linings, particularly industrial linings, but also wind power plant brake linings which may be bound to artificial resins as well as sintered or otherwise attached. The field of application of the invention includes all formulation types, such as low-met, NAO, sintered, semi-met, hybrid, and others.


Further applications in which fibers are used, and in which tribology plays an important role along with structural aspects, are also possible within the scope of the invention. For example, one other field of application may be the plastics industry, specifically the triboplastics sector. Accordingly, these may contain the fiber according to the invention.


Furthermore, the invention relates to a friction lining mixture comprising a fiber according to the invention.


The friction lining mixture according to the invention combines the application-specific benefits of solid lubricants, e.g., of metal sulfides, and fibers. In order to substitute copper, e.g., in brake linings, it is essential to combine various benefits in order to imitate the properties of copper when applying it to friction linings. By using solid composite lubricants, structuring and, at the same time, lubricating fibers in this case, a sustainable improvement of tribological characteristics is achieved.


According to the “contact-plateau theory”, a solid lubricant fiber or a fibrous solid lubricant, respectively, according to the invention offers very good characteristics for improving all aspects of friction linings.


Further, it may be envisioned that the filler of the friction lining mixture according to the invention is formed of one or more of barium sulfate, calcium carbonate, calcium hydroxide, calcium fluoride, iron oxide, silica, vermiculite, magnesium oxide, talc, zirconium silicate, zirconium oxide, mica, metal powder, molybdenum oxide, alumina, other metal oxides, silicon carbide, wollastonite, potassium titanate, chromite, calcium sulfate-whiskers, pet coke, rubber dust, nitrile rubber, acrylic rubber, friction dust.


Further, the invention relates to a brake or clutch lining consisting of a bonded friction lining mixture according to the invention.







EXAMPLES

Here, exemplary application-specific results of various sulfidized fibers are shown compared to each of the similar, but non-sulfidized fibers (blank) in brake linings.


The sulfidized fibers were incorporated into a common low-met formulation, and brake linings were crimped. Application-specific lining characteristics were tested using the AK-Master test according to the SAE J2522 on a dynamometer. The inertia used is listed in the results that are given below. The braking system used was a Golf I type system.









TABLE 1







AK-Master test results in coppery low-met formulation. Braking system: Golf 1,


inertia: 60 kg m2


















Fade 2



Results


Average

friction



(Cu-containing
Wear

friction

value



formulation,
lining
Improvement
value
Improvement
100-
Improvement


Inertia: 60 kg m2)
[g]
[%]
μ
[%]
>5 km/h
[%]
















Blank
13.3

0.33

0.24



Sulfidized steel fiber; trial 1
10.6
20
0.33
0
0.28
17


Suifidized steel fiber; trial 2
12.2
8
0.34
3
0.30
25


Suifidized steel fiber; trial 3
8.4
37
0.35
6
0.27
13


Sulfidized steel fiber; trial 4
8.3
38
0.36
9
0.29
21


Blank
14.9

0.32

0.28



Sulfidized stainless steel fiber,
11.5
23
0.33
3
0.30
7


trial 1








Sulfidized stainless steel fiber,
12.1
19
0.33
3
0.28
0


trial 2








Blank
13.3

0.33

0.24



Sulfidized rock wool, trial 1
11.6
13
0.33
0
0.28
17


Sulfidized rock wool, trial 2
9.0
32
0.34
3
0.28
17


Blank
17.4

0.33

0.21



Sulfidized glass fiber, trial 1
8.8
49
0.35
6
0.30
43


Sulfidized glass fiber, trial 2
13.2
24
0.33
0
0.30
43


Blank
13.3

0.33

0.24



Sulfidized aramid fiber, trial 1
11.7
12
0.36
9
0.28
17


Suifidized aramid fiber trial 2
13.1
2
0.34
3
0.31
29









In table 1, improvements for areas such as lining wear and average friction value as well as for the minimal friction value from the AK-Master block “Fade 2” are shown. Across the exemplary testing series, improvements in lining wear of up to 49% could be achieved, compared to the corresponding blank, for the average friction value acc. to the AK-Master test, an improvement of up to 9% could be achieved, and for the minimal friction value, an improvement of up to 43% could be seen.


The tests were repeated in a copper-free base mixture. In this formulation, improvements in lining wear of up to 29%, an increase of friction value of up to 13%, and an improvement of Fading 2 of up to 43% could be achieved.


The results are shown in the table below.









TABLE 2







AK-Master test results in Cu-free low-met formulation. Braking system: Golf 1, inertia:


40.6 kg m2


















Fade 2



Results


Average

friction



(Cu-free
Wear

friction

value



formulation,
lining
Improvement
value
Improvement
100-
Improvement


Inertia: 40.6 kg m2)
[g]
[%]
μ
[%]
>5 km/h
[%]
















Blank
7.0

0.31

0.24



Sulfidized steel fiber; trial 1
6.5
7
0.32
3
0.28
17


Sulfidized steel fiber; trial 2
6.2
11
0.33
6
0.30
25


Sulfidized steel fiber; trial 3
6.5
7
0.33
6
0.25
4


Sulfidized steel fiber; trial 4
6.3
10
0.34
10
0.24
0


Blank
6.9

0.32

0.28



Sulfidized stainless steel fiber,








trial 1
6.4
7
0.33
3
0.30
7


Sulfidized stainless steel fiber,








trial 2
6.3
9
0.33
3
0.28
0


Blank
7.0

0.31

0.24



Sulfidized rock wool, trial 1
5.7
19
0.32
3
0.28
17


Sulfidized rock wool, trial 2
5.9
16
0.31
0
0.28
17


Blank
6.6

0.33

0.21



Sulfidized glass fiber, trial 1
4.7
29
0.35
6
0.30
43


Sulfidized glass fiber, trial 2
5.7
14
0.33
0
0.30
43


Blank
7.0

0.31

0.24



Sulfidized aramid fiber, trial 1
5.9
16
0.35
13
0.28
17


Sulfidized aramid fiber trial 2
5.5
21
0.34
10
0.31
29









The friction lining formulations for testing the benefits of the functional fiber are shown below. In the application-specific comparison, steel fibers and stainless steel fibers and rock wool or aramid fibers, respectively, were each replaced by the corresponding sulfidized type.


Formulation, Cu-Containing [% by Weight]

  • Binder 6
  • Organic fillers 7
  • Aramid fiber 3
  • Rock wool 7
  • Steel fibers/Stainless steel fibers 11
  • Copper/brass 16
  • Inorganic fillers 27
  • Abrasive agents 10
  • Graphite/Coke 13
  • Formulation, Cu-free [% by weight]
  • Binder 6
  • Organic fillers 8
  • Aramid fibers 4
  • Rock wool 8
  • Steel fibers/Stainless steel fibers 13
  • Inorganic fillers 32
  • Abrasive agents 12
  • Graphite/Coke 17
    • FIG. 1 shows an example of a sulfidized steel fiber.
    • The steel fibers which were used have the following characteristics; Fiber length: min. 100 μm; max. 2000 μm; average: 900 μm Fiber diameter: min. 20 μm; max. 100 μm; average: 50 μm
    • Sulfide concentration in sulfidized steel fibers:















Description
SnS [wt %]
FeS [wt %]
MoS2 [wt %]







Steel fiber trial 1
 7
35



Steel fiber trial 2
10
10



Steel fiber trial 3

35
 7


Steel fiber trial 4

10
10


Stainless steel fiber trial 1
 7
35



Stainless steel fiber trial 2
10
10












    • Summary of various materials which could possibly be used in the friction lining formulation (individual group summary):





Examples of binders: thermosetting polymer, typically phenol resin or melamine resin, epoxy resin, modified phenol resins, synthetic rubber.


Examples of fillers: barium sulfate, calcium carbonate, calcium hydroxide, calcium fluoride, iron oxide, silica, vermiculite, magnesium oxide, talc, zirconium silicate, zirconium oxide, mica, metal powder, molybdenum oxide, alumina, other metal oxides, silicon carbide, wollastonite, potassium titanate, chromite, calcium sulfate-whiskers, pet coke, rubber dust, nitrile rubber, acrylic rubber, friction dust.

    • Exemplary use of friction linings:


Friction linings, e.g., disk brake linings, serve to slow moving objects, e.g., vehicles (cars). To achieve this, a friction lining is pressed against a moving counterbody with as much of its surface area as possible, and the counterbody is slowed down/braked in relation to the friction lining by the arising friction. Typically, this process leads to abrasion (wear) and frictional heat.


Further examples of fibers of the invention are provided as follows;

    • Solid lubricant surface concentration of coated steel fibers:















Description
SnS [wt %]
FeS [wt %]
CaF2 [wt %]


















Steel fiber trial 5
5
30
7


Steel fiber trial 6
10
10
10


Stainless steel fiber trial 3
5
30
7


Stainless steel fiber trial 4
10
10
10











    • Summary of sulfides comprised in metal sulfide fibers:



















Description
CuS [wt %]
SnS [wt %]
FeS [wt %]
MoS2 [wt %]



















Solid fiber 1

20
80



Solid fiber 2
6.5
13.5
80



Solid fiber 3

13.5
80
6.5











    • Solid lubricant fibers:





Direct production, e.g., through melt spinning processes, for solid lubricants, e.g., metal sulfides or multi-phased metal sulfides from a melt which was specifically produced for this purpose. One example of this would be a SnS fiber. For friction linings, the entire fiber content or a fraction of the produced fiber, respectively, will be used.


It was shown during implementation that the solid lubricant, bound to the fiber or comprising same, respectively, is distributed differently within the friction lining, meaning that it could be placed at another site where it would be needed, and thus supports tribological contact and shows its benefits of minimizing wear and stabilizing frictional values. Furthermore, the fiber-bound solid lubricant within the friction lining mixture can no longer sediment before pressing and after pre-mixing, and will continue to be present in a homogenous distribution even within the finished composite.


It has been shown that the invention also provides an ecological benefit in that the amount of non-ferrous metal, especially copper, in friction linings is reduced, which would otherwise be disseminated into the environment and have ecotoxic effects on same, through the resulting wear of the lining.

Claims
  • 1. A fiber for tribological applications characterized in that it comprises at least one solid lubricant or that it is coated, surface-treated, particularly coated, with at least one solid lubricant, said fiber being metal fiber, a ceramic fiber, a natural fiber, a polymeric fiber, a cellulose fiber, an aramid fiber, a plastic fiber, a glass fiber, a nanofiber, or a carbon fiber, andthe solid lubricant being formed of one or more of SnS, SnS2, MoS2, Bi2S3, ZnS, WS2, CuFeS2, FeS, CuS, Cu2S, MnS, Sb2S3, TiS2, sulfides of Cr/Co/Ni, Sn2S3, MoS3, WS3, Fe1-xS, MnS2, Sb2S5, ZrS2, CaS, MgS, sulfides of Lace multi-phased metal sulfides of various metals, B 1, PTFE phosphates, oxides, or mixtures thereof.
  • 2. The fiber according to claim 1, characterized in that said coated fiber is one of natural origin, or is synthetically produced, or is obtained through recycling of natural and/or synthetic products.
  • 3. (canceled)
  • 4. The fiber according to claim 1, characterized in that said fiber comprises metal sulfide.
  • 5. The fiber according to claim 1, characterized in that said fiber is sulfidized.
  • 6. The fiber according to claim 1, characterized in that said fiber comprising a solid lubricant is produced by laser sintering, melting extraction, machined fiber production, section rolling or spinning methods.
  • 7. The fiber according to claim 1, characterized in that the solid lubricant is formed of at least one metal sulfide.
  • 8. The fiber according to claim 1, characterized in that the amount of the at least one solid lubricant is at least 3% by weight, preferably at least 4% by weight, especially at least 5% by weight, and most preferably at least 10% by weight.
  • 9. The fiber according to claim 7, characterized in that the one or more of the metal sulfides are in the form of multi-phased metal sulfides.
  • 10. (canceled)
  • 11. A friction lining mixture having at least one fiber according to claim 1.
  • 12. The friction lining mixture according to claim 11, characterized in that an organic, inorganic binder, or no binder is provided.
  • 13. The friction lining mixture according to claim 12, characterized in that the bond is obtained through thermal and/or compressing methods.
  • 14. The friction lining mixture according to claim 11, characterized in that the filler is formed of one or more of barium sulfate, calcium carbonate, calcium hydroxide, calcium fluoride, iron oxide, silica, vermiculite, magnesium oxide, talc, zirconium silicate, zirconium oxide, mica, metal powder, molybdenum oxide, alumina, other metal oxides, silicon carbide, wollastonite, potassium titanate, chromite, calcium sulfate-whiskers, pet coke, rubber dust, nitrile rubber, acrylic rubber, friction dust.
  • 15. The friction lining mixture according to claim 13, characterized in that the matrix is a sinterable substance mixture having a bulk amount of copper or iron.
  • 16-21. (canceled)
  • 22. Use of a fiber according to claim 1, for producing a sliding or frictional component or of a sliding or frictional element.
  • 23. Use of a fiber according to claim 1, for producing a brake or clutch lining consisting of a bonded friction lining mixture.
  • 24. Use of a fiber according to claim 1, for producing a polymeric component.
  • 25. Use of a fiber according to claim 1, for producing an anti-friction coating and other coatings.
  • 26. Use of a fiber according to claim 1, for producing a triboplastic, even in the form of tribo-premixes, tribocompounds, tribo-masterbatches.
  • 27. Use of a fiber according to claim 1, for producing a component having tribological application areas.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
A 682/2015 Oct 2015 AT national
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/EP2016/075122 10/19/2016 WO 00