The present invention relates generally to armored fiber optic cables and assemblies.
Communication networks are used to transport a variety of signals such as voice, video, data transmission, and the like. Traditional communication networks use copper wires in cables for transporting information and data. However, copper cables have drawbacks because they are large, heavy, and can only transmit a relatively limited amount of data with a reasonable cable diameter. Consequently, optical waveguide cables replaced most of the copper cables in long-haul communication network links, thereby providing greater bandwidth capacity for long-haul links. However, most communication networks still use copper cables for distribution and/or drop links on the subscriber side of the central office. In other words, subscribers have a limited amount of available bandwidth due to the constraints of copper cables in the communication network. Stated another way, the copper cables are a bottleneck that inhibit the subscriber from utilizing the relatively high-bandwidth capacity of the optical fiber long-haul links.
As optical waveguides are deployed deeper into communication networks, subscribers will have access to increased bandwidth. But certain obstacles exist that make it challenging and/or expensive to route optical waveguides/optical cables closer to the subscriber. For instance, accessing optical waveguides and the connection between a drop cable and the distribution fiber optic cable require a low-cost solution that is craft-friendly for installation, connectorization, and versatility. Moreover, the reliability and robustness of the fiber optic cables and the interconnection therebetween must withstand the rigors of an outdoor environment.
Conventional distribution fiber optic cables require opening by cutting or otherwise splitting the cable jacket and pulling the optical fibers through the jacket opening. However, it can be difficult to locate the correct fibers, and even when they are located, removing them from the cable without damaging the selected optical fibers or other optical fibers in the cable can be challenging. Once the desired optical fibers are located and safely removed, the operator has to connectorize or splice the optical fibers for optical connection with the network. Conducting the access process with conventional cables in less-than-ideal conditions in the field is time-consuming, expensive, and risks damaging the optical fibers of conventional cables. Likewise, the access process is difficult in the factory with conventional cables.
According to an exemplary embodiment, a fiber optic cable includes a jacket, a pair of strength members, and an optical fiber. The jacket has a cavity, a major dimension and a minor dimension, and a medial portion. The strength members are disposed on opposing sides of the cavity and impart a preferential bend characteristic to the cable. The at least one optical fiber is disposed within the cavity. The jacket includes preferential tear portions disposed between a respective strength member and the medial portion, for separating the strength members from the medial portion.
It is to be understood that both the foregoing general description and the following detailed description present exemplary and explanatory embodiments of the invention, and are intended to provide an overview or framework for understanding the nature and character of the invention as it is claimed. The accompanying drawings are included to provide a further understanding of the invention, and are incorporated into and constitute a part of this specification. The drawings illustrate various exemplary embodiments of the invention, and together with the description, serve to explain the principles and operations of the invention.
a respectively are a cross-sectional view and a perspective view of another fiber optic cable assembly according to the present invention.
Reference will now be made in detail to exemplary embodiments of the invention, examples of which are described herein and shown in the accompanying drawings. Whenever practical, the same reference numerals are used throughout the drawings to refer to the same or similar parts or features.
Cable 10 is advantageous because it can be easily accessed from either of the generally planar sides of the cable, thereby allowing access to the desired optical fiber. In other words, ribbons from either side of the ribbon stack, i.e., top or bottom, can be accessed by opening the cable at the respective planar side. Consequently, the craftsman is able to access to any optical fiber desired for optical connection. As depicted, cavity 20 has a cavity minor dimension CH and a cavity major dimension CW and has a generally rectangular shape with a fixed orientation, but other shapes and arrangements are possible such as generally square, round, or oval. By way of example, cavity may be rotated or stranded in any suitable manner along its longitudinal length. The cavity can also have a partial oscillation through a given angle, for instance, the cavity can rotate between a clockwise angle that is less than a full rotation and then rotate counter-clockwise for less than a full rotation. Furthermore, one or more cavities may be offset towards one of the major surfaces 11, thereby allowing easy opening and access from one side as shown in
As shown in
Consequently, the craftsman or automation process has simple and easy access to cavity 20 by running a utility blade or cutting tool along the length of the cable without cutting into strength members 14, thereby allowing entry to cavity 20 while inhibiting damage to the at least one optical fiber 12 or strength members during the access procedure. In other words, the craftsman can simply cut into cable jacket 18 by slicing the cable jacket 18 and may use strength members 14 as a guide for the blade or cutting tool, thereby exposing cavity 20 during the cutting and allowing access to the at least one optical fiber therein. In other words, sizing the cavity minor dimension CH so that it is about the same size or greater than the strength member dimension D that is generally aligned with minor dimension H1 advantageously allows quick and reliable access to cavity 20. Thus, the optical fibers in the cables of the present invention may be easily, quickly, and repeatably accessed by a craftsman or likewise in an automated process. However, cable or cable assembly embodiments according to the present invention can have cavities with minor cavity dimensions generally aligned with the minor cable dimension that are smaller than the strength member dimension D. Additionally, the generally flat major surfaces of the cables are advantageous because they allow for a smaller cable footprint and uses less jacket material compared with round cables.
Cables according to the present invention may have any suitable dimensions, constructions, and/or fiber counts for the given application. By way of example, in distribution applications the major dimension W1 is preferably about 15 millimeters or less and the minor dimension H1 is preferably about 10 millimeters or less. In drop applications, major dimension W1 is preferably about 10 millimeters or less and the minor dimension H1 is preferably about 5 millimeters or less. Of course, other cables of the present invention can have other sizes and/or structures for the given application depending on the requirements and fiber count of the cable. For instance, cables of the present invention may have larger dimensions for the major dimension, the minor dimension, and/or different structures such as a toneable portion as shown in
Optical fiber ribbons 13 used in the cables of the present invention can have any suitable design or ribbon count.
Optical fibers preferably have an excess fiber length (EFL) compared with a length of cavity 20. For instance, optical fibers have an EFL of between about 0.0 and about 0.5 percent; however, in some instances the EFL may also be slightly negative. Likewise, ribbons can have an excess ribbon length (ERL). Besides inhibiting the application of strain to the optical fibers, EFL or ERL can aid in coupling the optical fibers or ribbons with the cable jacket or tube. By way of example, the ERL is preferably in the range of about 0.1 percent to about 1.2 percent, and more preferably in the range of about 0.3 percent to about 1.0 percent, and most preferably in the range of about 0.5 percent to about 0.8 percent, thereby inhibiting the application of strain, allowing bending of the fiber optic cable without causing elevated levels of optical attenuation, and/or suitable low temperature performance. Additionally, the amount of ERL may depend on specific cable design such as the number of ribbons within the cavity, the cavity size, intended application, and/or other parameters.
As shown in
Illustratively,
The compressible nature of hollow polymeric microspheres is suited for providing adequate coupling of the optical fibers to the tube or cable jacket. Additionally, the smooth round surface of these microspheres permits pressing against the optical fibers without inducing elevated levels of optical attenuation such as during bending, twisting, or crushing of the cable. Additionally, the size of the hollow microspheres can vary from about 1 micron to about 300 microns, likewise, a wall thickness of the microspheres can also vary from about 0.1 micron up to several microns, but other suitable dimensions are possible as long as a suitable level of optical performance is maintained.
No matter the construction and/or materials of the dry insert, filling material or the like, it should provide a suitable level of coupling for the optical fibers to the cable jacket. Additionally, in order to quantify the amount of coupling for the optical fibers a relatively long length of fiber optic cable is required. By way of example, optical fibers of cables according to the present invention have a coupling force of at least about 0.1625 Newtons per optical fiber for a thirty-meter length of fiber optic cable. Illustratively, a fiber optic cable having a single ribbon with twelve optical fibers in the ribbon should have a minimum coupling force of about 1.95 Newtons for a thirty-meter length of fiber optic cable. Likewise, a similar fiber optical cable having a single optical fiber ribbon with six optical fibers should have a minimum coupling force of about 0.975 Newtons for a thirty-meter length of fiber optic cable. Measurement of the coupling force is accomplished by taking a thirty-meter fiber optic cable sample and pulling on a first end of the optical fibers (or fiber optic ribbon(s)) and measuring the force required to cause movement of the second end of the optical fiber(s) (or fiber optic ribbon(s)). In other words, the EFL (or ERL) must be straightened so that the coupling force is the amount of force required to move the entire length of optical fibers within the thirty-meter fiber optic cable sample.
Cable 50 also includes toneable lobe 55 that is useful for locating the cable in buried applications while still allowing for a main cable body 51 that is dielectric. Toneable lobe 55 includes a conductive wire 57 disposed within a jacket portion 58 of toneable lobe 55. By way of example, conductive wire 57 is a 24-gauge copper wire that allows the craftsman to apply a toning signal thereto for locating the cable so it can be located or have its location marked to prevent inadvertent damage. Jacket 18 and jacket portion 58 are typically co-extruded simultaneously using the same extrusion tooling. As shown, jacket portion 58 is connected with jacket 18 of main cable body 51 by a frangible web 59 so that toneable lobe 55 can easily be separated from main cable body 51 for connectorization or other purposes. Specifically, web 59 can include a preferential tear portion (not numbered) using suitable geometry for controlling the location of the tear between the toneable lobe 55 and main cable body 51. Toneable lobe 55 preferably tears away from main cable body 51 cleanly so that it does not leave a ridge thereon, thereby allowing for a profile that permits easy sealing with a connector boot or the like. Toneable lobe 55 is advantageous because if the cable is struck by lightning the toneable lobe 55 would be damaged, but main cable body 51 would not be significantly damaged since it is dielectric. Consequently, the cable is toneable without requiring the labor and hardware necessary for grounding the cable. Of course, other cables of the present invention may also include a toneable lobe.
Cables of the present invention are also useful as a portion of a larger cable assembly that is useful for distributing optical fibers toward the subscriber. The cable assemblies can be assembled in the factory or they can be constructed in the field.
Tether cable 120 can have any suitable cable construction such as round or generally flat as shown in
Cable assembly 100 has a maximum cross-sectional area near the point where tether cable 130 is connected due to the connectorization and/or environmentally sealing, (i.e., the overmolding), near the point where the distribution cable is opened. For instance, at the sealing portion 140, cable assembly 100 preferably has a maximum assembly cross-sectional dimension of about 25 millimeters or less, more preferably, about 21 millimeters or less, and most preferably about 17 millimeters or less. Additionally, cable assemblies of present invention have a fill-ratio about 80 percent or less and more preferably about 70 percent or less for the given inner diameter of the duct.
a respectively illustrate a cross-sectional view and a perspective view of a cable assembly 200 that includes a distribution cable 210, a receptacle or other suitable joining point 230, and a sealing portion 240 such as an overmold portion or the like. Cable assembly 200 is advantageous because it has a relatively small cross-sectional footprint due to the arrangement between distribution cable 210 and receptacle 230. Distribution cable 210 includes a plurality of ribbons 213 disposed within a cavity 220 of a cable jacket 218. Distribution cable 210 also includes two strength members 214 disposed on opposite sides of cavity 220. Distribution cable 210 has a flat profile with two generally flat major surfaces (not numbered) with major dimension W2 and minor dimension 112 of the cable; however, this cable may have any suitably sized and/or shaped cavity. Simply stated, cavity 220 may have any suitable minor or major dimension. In this embodiment, cable assembly 200 routes the optical fibers from one or more of the plurality of ribbons 213 of distribution cable 210 to receptacle 230 without using a tether cable. As shown, this embodiment includes twelve-fiber ribbons and uses twelve-fiber ferrules; however, any suitable combination of optical fiber arrangements and ferrule constructions are possible. Receptacle 230 is suitable for terminating a plurality of optical fibers 212 within a multifiber ferrule 232 that is attached to housing 234 of the receptacle. Receptacle 230 is preferably hardened and configured for an environmental sealing of the assembly. Housing 234 aids in aligning and protecting ferrule 232 and is preferably keyed. Additionally, receptacle 230 may have a threaded portion for securing the optical connection with a complimentary mating assembly such as a hardened connector. Additionally, receptacle 230 can have a cap 250 that is removably attached thereto for protecting the ferrule, connector, and/or receptacle during sealing such as with overmolding and afterwards. Suitable receptacles are shown and described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,579,014 issued Jun. 17, 2003 entitled “Fiber Optic Receptacle” and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/924,525 filed Aug. 24, 2004 entitled “Fiber Optic Receptacle and Plug Assemblies”. Other cable assemblies may have connectors or receptacles that eliminate the shroud or housing, thereby allowing a smaller cross-sectional footprint. Specifically, optical fibers 212 are routed to a multifiber ferrule 232 of connector 230 where they are attached in respective bores. Ferrule 232 has a cross-section with a minor axis FH and a major axis FW. Ferrule 232 may have any suitable orientation with respect to cable 210, but in preferred embodiments minor axis FH is generally aligned with minor dimension 112 of cable 210, thereby providing a known orientation that may be useful for maintaining a small cross-sectional footprint for the assembly. Of course, cable assembly 200 can have multiple connectors 230 attached along its length; moreover, cable assembly 200 may locate connectors on either or both sides of the generally flat major surfaces.
The cables of the present invention may also use optical fibers that are relatively bend resistant for preserving optical performance when subjected to relatively small bend radii.
By way of example, bend resistant optical fibers may have microstructures that allow reduced bend radii while preserving optical performance, thereby permitting aggressive bending/installation solutions while optical attenuation remains extremely low. As shown, bend performance optical fiber 12′ is a microstructured optical fiber having a core region and a cladding region surrounding the core region, the cladding region comprising an annular hole-containing region comprised of non-periodically disposed holes such that the optical fiber is capable of single mode transmission at one or more wavelengths in one or more operating wavelength ranges. The core region and cladding region provide improved bend resistance, and single mode operation at wavelengths preferably greater than or equal to 1500 nm, in some embodiments also greater than about 1310 nm, in other embodiments also greater than 1260 nm. The optical fibers provide a mode field at a wavelength of 1310 nm preferably greater than 8.0 microns, more preferably between about 8.0 and 10.0 microns. In preferred embodiments, optical fiber disclosed herein is thus single-mode transmission optical fiber.
In some embodiments, the microstructured optical fibers disclosed herein comprises a core region disposed about a longitudinal centerline, and a cladding region surrounding the core region, the cladding region comprising an annular hole-containing region comprised of non-periodically disposed holes, wherein the annular hole-containing region has a maximum radial width of less than 12 microns, the annular hole-containing region has a regional void area percent of less than about 30 percent, and the non-periodically disposed holes have a mean diameter of less than 1550 nm.
By “non-periodically disposed” or “non-periodic distribution”, we mean that when one takes a cross-section (such as a cross-section perpendicular to the longitudinal axis) of the optical fiber, the non-periodically disposed holes are randomly or non-periodically distributed across a portion of the fiber. Similar cross sections taken at different points along the length of the fiber will reveal different cross-sectional hole patterns, i.e., various cross-sections will have different hole patterns, wherein the distributions of holes and sizes of holes do not match. That is, the holes are non-periodic, i.e., they are not periodically disposed within the fiber structure. These holes are stretched (elongated) along the length (i.e. in a direction generally parallel to the longitudinal axis) of the optical fiber, but do not extend the entire length of the entire fiber for typical lengths of transmission fiber.
For a variety of applications, it is desirable for the holes to be formed such that greater than about 95% of and preferably all of the holes exhibit a mean hole size in the cladding for the optical fiber which is less than 1550 nm, more preferably less than 775 nm, most preferably less than 390 nm. Likewise, it is preferable that the maximum diameter of the holes in the fiber be less than 7000 nm, more preferably less than 2000 nm, and even more preferably less than 1550 nm, and most preferably less than 775 nm. In some embodiments, the fibers disclosed herein have fewer than 5000 holes, in some embodiments also fewer than 1000 holes, and in other embodiments the total number of holes is fewer than 500 holes in a given optical fiber perpendicular cross-section. Of course, the most preferred fibers will exhibit combinations of these characteristics. Thus, for example, one particularly preferred embodiment of optical fiber would exhibit fewer than 200 holes in the optical fiber, the holes having a maximum diameter less than 1550 nm and a mean diameter less than 775 nm, although useful and bend resistant optical fibers can be achieved using larger and greater numbers of holes. The hole number, mean diameter, max diameter, and total void area percent of holes can all be calculated with the help of a scanning electron microscope at a magnification of about 800× and image analysis software, such as ImagePro, which is available from Media Cybernetics, Inc. of Silver Spring, Md., USA.
The optical fibers disclosed herein may or may not include germania or fluorine to also adjust the refractive index of the core and or cladding of the optical fiber, but these dopants can also be avoided in the intermediate annular region and instead, the holes (in combination with any gas or gases that may be disposed within the holes) can be used to adjust the manner in which light is guided down the core of the fiber. The hole-containing region may consist of undoped (pure) silica, thereby completely avoiding the use of any dopants in the hole-containing region, to achieve a decreased refractive index, or the hole-containing region may comprise doped silica, e.g. fluorine-doped silica having a plurality of holes.
In one set of embodiments, the core region includes doped silica to provide a positive refractive index relative to pure silica, e.g. germania doped silica. The core region is preferably hole-free. As illustrated in
Such fiber can be made to exhibit a fiber cutoff of less than 1400 nm, more preferably less than 1310 nm, a 20 mm macrobend induced loss at 1550 nm of less than 1 dB/turn, preferably less than 0.5 dB/turn, even more preferably less than 0.1 dB/turn, still more preferably less than 0.05 dB/turn, yet more preferably less than 0.03 dB/turn, and even still more preferably less than 0.02 dB/turn, a 12 mm macrobend induced loss at 1550 nm of less than 5 dB/turn, preferably less than 1 dB/turn, more preferably less than 0.5 dB/turn, even more preferably less than 0.2 dB/turn, still more preferably less than 0.01 dB/turn, still even more preferably less than 0.05 dB/turn, and a 8 mm macrobend induced loss at 1550 nm of less than 5 dB/turn, preferably less than 1 dB/turn, more preferably less than 0.5 dB/turn, and even more preferably less than 0.2 dB-turn, and still even more preferably less than 0.1 dB/turn.
An example of a suitable fiber is illustrated in
It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications and variations can be made in the cable and cable assemblies of the present invention without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention. For instance, cables or assemblies of the present invention can include other cable components such as ripcords, paper or mica tapes, a friction element, or other suitable components. Illustratively, a cable similar to cable 10 can further include a plurality of small steel wires disposed near the north and south positions for inhibiting cutting into the grps during access procedures. Although cable assemblies discuss a distribution cable that is in optical communication with one or more tether cables, the cable assemblies may be used upstream in the optical network such as a feeder cable that is in optical communication with one or more distribution cables. Thus, it is intended that the present invention cover the modifications and variations of this invention provided they come within the scope of the appended claims and their equivalents.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/269,364, filed May 5, 2014, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/243,158 filed Apr. 2, 2014, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/843,402, filed Jul. 26, 2010, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/553,426, filed Sep. 3, 2009, which issued Aug. 31, 2010 as U.S. Pat. No. 7,787,727, and which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/277,963 filed Nov. 25, 2008, now abandoned, which is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/643,357 filed Dec. 21, 2006, which issued Dec. 30, 2008 as U.S. Pat. No. 7,471,862, and which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/193,516, filed Jul. 29, 2005, which issued Aug. 19, 2008 as U.S. Pat. No. 7,415,181, all of which are hereby incorporated by reference herein in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3637458 | Parrish | Jan 1972 | A |
4078853 | Kempf et al. | Mar 1978 | A |
4089585 | Slaughter et al. | May 1978 | A |
4199225 | Slaughter et al. | Apr 1980 | A |
4226504 | Bellino | Oct 1980 | A |
4232935 | Rohner et al. | Nov 1980 | A |
4401361 | Slaughter | Aug 1983 | A |
4420220 | Dean et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
4446686 | Panuska et al. | May 1984 | A |
4701015 | Saito et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4705571 | Lange et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4707569 | Yoshimura et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4725628 | Garvey et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4725629 | Garvey et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4761053 | Cogelia et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4815813 | Arroyo et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4818060 | Arroyo | Apr 1989 | A |
4842221 | Beach et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4909592 | Arroyo et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4913517 | Arroyo et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4979795 | Mascarenhas | Dec 1990 | A |
5016952 | Arroyo et al. | May 1991 | A |
5039195 | Jenkins et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5054880 | Bruggendieck | Oct 1991 | A |
5082380 | Sutehall et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5109456 | Sano et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5109457 | Panuska et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5125060 | Edmundson | Jun 1992 | A |
5125063 | Panuska et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5133034 | Arroyo et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5218659 | Schneider | Jun 1993 | A |
5224190 | Chu et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5243675 | Kathiresan et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5350777 | Yuge et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5377290 | Ohta et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5422973 | Ferguson et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5509097 | Tondi-Resta et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5621841 | Field | Apr 1997 | A |
5621842 | Keller | Apr 1997 | A |
5630003 | Arroyo | May 1997 | A |
5651081 | Blew et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5668912 | Keller | Sep 1997 | A |
5673352 | Bauer et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5675686 | Rosenmayer et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5684904 | Bringuier et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5689601 | Hager et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5698615 | Polle | Dec 1997 | A |
5763067 | Brüggemann et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5838863 | Fujiura et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5896482 | Blee et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
6087000 | Girgis et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6091871 | Elisson et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6122424 | Bringuier | Sep 2000 | A |
6178278 | Keller et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6195488 | Song | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6226431 | Brown et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6229944 | Yokokawa et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6256439 | Brown et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6278826 | Sheu | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6314224 | Stevens et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6321012 | Shen | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6377738 | Anderson et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6389204 | Hurley | May 2002 | B1 |
6463199 | Quinn et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6493491 | Shen et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6501888 | Gimblet et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6504979 | Norris et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6542674 | Gimblet | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6574400 | Lail | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6579014 | Melton et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6586094 | Rebouillant et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6618526 | Jackman et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6643437 | Park | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6654527 | Sakabe et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6665478 | Shen | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6711329 | Zelesnik | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6711392 | Gillis | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6714708 | McAlpine et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6714710 | Gimblet | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6728451 | Kordahi | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6748148 | Chiasson et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6749446 | Nechitailo | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6792184 | Conrad et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6847768 | Lail et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6853783 | Chiasson et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6876798 | Triplett et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6928217 | Mohler et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7006739 | Elkins, II et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7016592 | Elkins, II et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7050688 | Lochkovic et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7079734 | Seddon et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7088893 | Cooke et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7113679 | Melton et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7127143 | Elkins, II et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7184633 | Cooke et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7277615 | Greenwood et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7415181 | Greenwood et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7450804 | Elkins, II et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7450806 | Bookbinder et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7471861 | Schneider et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7471862 | Bringuier et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7660501 | Elkins, II et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7693375 | Freeland et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7787727 | Bringuier et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
20020009272 | Parris | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020076179 | Hardwick, III et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020126970 | Anderson et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030026662 | Vidal et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030044137 | Lopez | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030059181 | Jackman et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030068147 | Nechitailo | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030091307 | Hurley et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030099448 | Gimblet | May 2003 | A1 |
20030161596 | Register et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030223714 | Conrad et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040112629 | Rossi | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040120663 | Lail et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040156603 | Schneider et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040228589 | Melton et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050013573 | Lochkovic et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050053342 | Melton et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050111800 | Cooke et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20060045428 | Theuerkorn et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060140557 | Parris et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060165355 | Greenwood et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1245902 | Mar 2000 | CN |
1279407 | Jan 2001 | CN |
1384380 | Dec 2002 | CN |
2445532 | Jan 1976 | DE |
2434280 | Feb 1976 | DE |
2944997 | Aug 1980 | DE |
3444500 | Nov 1985 | DE |
2743260 | Jun 1986 | DE |
19713063 | Oct 1998 | DE |
10129772 | Jan 2003 | DE |
0022036 | Jan 1981 | EP |
0309827 | Apr 1989 | EP |
0353775 | Feb 1990 | EP |
0577233 | Jan 1994 | EP |
0752603 | Jan 1997 | EP |
0916980 | May 1999 | EP |
1065545 | Jan 2001 | EP |
1085356 | Mar 2001 | EP |
1085357 | Mar 2001 | EP |
1087247 | Mar 2001 | EP |
1170614 | Jan 2002 | EP |
1302796 | Apr 2003 | EP |
1245981 | Jun 2006 | EP |
1697768 | Sep 2006 | EP |
1818704 | Aug 2007 | EP |
2159291 | Nov 1985 | GB |
2159591 | Dec 1985 | GB |
2189071 | Oct 1987 | GB |
2258319 | Feb 1993 | GB |
58150907 | Sep 1983 | JP |
59055707 | Mar 1984 | JP |
60087307 | May 1985 | JP |
60156025 | Aug 1985 | JP |
61023101 | Jan 1986 | JP |
61023104 | Jan 1986 | JP |
61167602 | Jul 1986 | JP |
63201611 | Aug 1988 | JP |
2228618 | Sep 1990 | JP |
6160679 | Jun 1994 | JP |
7159629 | Jun 1995 | JP |
9033774 | Feb 1997 | JP |
9152535 | Jun 1997 | JP |
11271581 | Oct 1999 | JP |
11337783 | Dec 1999 | JP |
2001124965 | May 2001 | JP |
2001343565 | Dec 2001 | JP |
2001343566 | Dec 2001 | JP |
2002228896 | Aug 2002 | JP |
2002228897 | Aug 2002 | JP |
2002236241 | Aug 2002 | JP |
2002333556 | Nov 2002 | JP |
2003121711 | Apr 2003 | JP |
2004139068 | May 2004 | JP |
2004145132 | May 2004 | JP |
2004151434 | May 2004 | JP |
2004530936 | Oct 2004 | JP |
2005504997 | Feb 2005 | JP |
2006526793 | Nov 2006 | JP |
2007538287 | Dec 2007 | JP |
2002099491 | Dec 2002 | WO |
2003001266 | Jan 2003 | WO |
2004038474 | May 2004 | WO |
2004061866 | Jul 2004 | WO |
2005010565 | Feb 2005 | WO |
2005036213 | Apr 2005 | WO |
2006043967 | Apr 2006 | WO |
2007016479 | Feb 2007 | WO |
2007092046 | Aug 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Australian Office Action for Application No. 2007101252, dated Apr. 29, 2013, 3 pages. |
Australian Office Action for Application No. 2007334346, dated Oct. 13, 2010, 3 pages. |
Beasley, B., “Look, Mom! No Gel!” Outside Plant Magazine. Dec. 2002. p. 16-18. |
Chung, Su-Vun, “Macrobend Loss of 1300nm Optimized Single Mode Fibre” at 1550 nm, Intern. Wire & Cable Symposium Proceedings (Nov. 1988) p. 704-709. |
Dixon, L., et al., “Crush and Bending Resistance in Next Generation Cable Designs”, Proc. of the 50th Intern. Wire & Cable Symposium, p. 422-431 (2001). |
Dow Plastics, “Resin for Pipe Extrusion and Pipe Fittings”, Apr. 7, 2003. |
European Office Action for Application No. 07863116.5, dated Jan. 10, 2011, 5 pages. |
Geca-Tapes, Non-Woven Wrapping-Tapes Catalog “Foam Tapes”, Apr. 1996. |
Geca-Tapes, Waterblocking Tapes Catalog—“Waterblocking Foam Tapes”, Apr. 1996. |
http://computer.yourdictionary.com/ribbon-cable. |
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/ribbon+cable. |
http://merriam-webster.com/dictionary/layer. |
http://merriam-webster.com/dictionary/tape. |
http://www.pcmag.com/encyclopedia_term/0,1237,t=ribbon+cable&i=50523,00.asp. |
Norris, R.H.; Weimann, P.A., “Dry Central Tube Ribbon Cables for the Outside Plant Environment”, Proc. of the 51st Intern. Wire & Cable Symposium, p. 202-210 (2002). |
Okada et al., Proceedings of the 49th International Wire and Cable Symposium “Development of New Dry Tube with Water Blocking Laminated Tape”, Nov. 2000. |
Patent Cooperation Treaty, International Search Report for PCT/US2007/025953, dated Mar. 14, 2008, 16 pages. |
Taylor, C., et al., “Effect of Water Blocking Materials on Moisture Diffusion in Prototype Cable Structures”, Proc. of the 50th Intern. Wire & Cable Symposium, p. 518-525 (2001). |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/817,721, Bickham, Scott R., et al., “Microstructured transmission optical fiber,” filed Jun. 30, 2006. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/817,863, Bookbinder, Dana C., “Low bend loss optical fiber with high modulus coating,” filed Jun. 30, 2006. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/841,458, Bickham, Scott R., et al., “Low bend loss optical fiber with deep depressed ring,” filed Aug. 31, 2006. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/841,490, Bickham, Scott R., et al., “Low bend loss single mode optical fiber,” filed Aug. 31, 2006. |
Van Vickie, P.; et al., “Innovative Dry Buffer Tube Design for Central Tube Ribbon Cable”, Proc. of the 2001 National Fiber Optics Engineers Conference, p. 154-161 (2001). |
Wagman, R., et al., “BOTDR Analysis of Cable Tensile Testing”, Proc. of the 48th Intern. Wire & Cable Symposium, p. 658-664 (1999). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170031107 A1 | Feb 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11643357 | Dec 2006 | US |
Child | 12277963 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14269364 | May 2014 | US |
Child | 15295158 | US | |
Parent | 14243158 | Apr 2014 | US |
Child | 14269364 | US | |
Parent | 12843402 | Jul 2010 | US |
Child | 14243158 | US | |
Parent | 12553426 | Sep 2009 | US |
Child | 12843402 | US | |
Parent | 12277963 | Nov 2008 | US |
Child | 12553426 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11193516 | Jul 2005 | US |
Child | 11643357 | US |