The present invention relates to medical devices, and in particular to a fiber optic catheter with imaging capabilities.
An endoscope is a piece of surgical equipment that has imaging capabilities so as to be able to provide images of an internal body cavity of a patient. Most minimally invasive surgical procedures performed in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract or other internal body cavities are accomplished with the aid of an endoscope. An endoscope includes one or more working channels through which other medical catheters/instruments can pass. Typically, an endoscope is used to reach an area of interest within a body cavity and, thereafter, another instrument such as a surgical catheter is extended through the working channel of the endoscope to perform some desired procedure. An endoscope, however, typically has a diameter that is relatively large with respect to the body cavity or body lumen through which it must pass.
A need exists for smaller-diameter devices with imaging capability. Preferably, such smaller-diameter devices are steerable so that a physician can readily obtain an image of a location of interest within the body cavity.
The present invention is a smaller-diameter device with imaging capability involving a single optical fiber or an optical fiber bundle. In one embodiment, an optical fiber or fiber bundle with imaging capability is received axially through a lumen of a steerable catheter. Such a catheter typically includes a single steering cable, a distal end of which is attached to the distal end of the catheter. By manipulating the proximal end of the steering cable, a physician can bend the distal end of the catheter to thereby steer the catheter. A steerable catheter with a single steering cable, however, can bend only in one direction. Thus, to bend the catheter in any desired direction in a three-dimensional space, the catheter must be axially rotated so that the one-directional bend will point in the desired direction. Consequently, the steerable catheter incorporating an optical fiber is subjected to repeated torque that twists and potentially damages the fiber.
To overcome the foregoing disadvantage in some applications, the present invention further offers a steerable imaging catheter including a fiber optic cable, which is configured to minimize the application of undesirable torque to the fiber optic cable. To achieve this goal, in one embodiment, a steerable imaging catheter uses at least two cables that bend and steer the catheter. The use of multiple steering cables reduces the need for axially rotating the catheter to achieve a desired bend, and therefore minimizes unduly twisting and damaging the fiber optic cable. In another embodiment of the present invention, a steerable imaging catheter is formed of a catheter tube that has greater flexibility near its distal end portion and has greater stiffness (column strength) in the remainder of the tube. This construction concentrates any flexing and also some torque application at the distal end portion of the tube, while minimizing undue twisting of the tube including the fiber optic cable in the remainder of the tube.
Specifically, according to one embodiment of the present invention, a steerable imaging catheter is provided, including an elongated catheter tube, at least two steering cables extending along the catheter tube to control the movement of the distal end of the catheter tube, and a fiber optic cable extending through the catheter tube. The catheter may be an imaging-only catheter whose sole function is imaging, or may be any diagnostic/therapeutic catheter having a diagnostic/therapeutic function (e.g., a balloon catheter, stent delivery catheter, sphincterotomy catheter, etc.) in addition to the imaging function. The fiber optic cable transmits illumination light from its proximal end to its distal end and further transmits an image from its distal end to its proximal end. The diameter of the steerable imaging catheter is generally between 1 mm and 4.5 mm, which is smaller than that of a conventional endoscope to permit visualization of a body cavity/lumen that typically cannot be reached by an endoscope, The use of multiple steering cables to control the distal end of the catheter tube permits bending of the distal end in various (two or more) directions in varying degrees. This feature not only prevents undue twisting of the fiber optic cable, but also adds to the maneuverability of the catheter tube, and further significantly increases the range of view of the fiber optic cable.
According to another embodiment of the present invention, a steerable imaging catheter is provided, including an elongated catheter tube, at least one steering cable extending along the catheter tube to control the movement of the distal end of the catheter tube, and a fiber optic cable extending through the catheter tube. As before, the catheter may be an imaging-only catheter whose sole function is imaging, or may be any diagnostic/therapeutic catheter having a diagnostic/therapeutic function in addition to the imaging function. The catheter tube is constructed so as to have greater flexibility near its distal end portion while having greater stiffness in the remainder of the tube. This may be accomplished, for example, by varying the durometer rating of the materials used to form the catheter tube. Such construction concentrates the flexing at the distal end portion, rather than throughout the entire catheter tube, to thereby reduce undue twisting of the catheter tube along its entire length, and further to permit better control of the movement of the distal end portion.
According to one embodiment of the invention, a catheter tube defines a plurality of lumens extending therethrough, and one of the lumens receives the fiber optic cable. The other lumens may receive irrigation/sufflation fluid or other devices or equipment. In one embodiment, the other lumen may receive a measuring probe therethrough. The measuring probe includes incremental or numerical markings provided at its distal end portion. By placing the incremental markings and an object to be measured in the field of view of the fiber optic cable, a physician can visually measure the size of the object in reference to the incremental markings.
According to another embodiment of the invention, the other lumen may receive a cutting device such as a cutting wire for delivering RF energy. A physician can deliver the cutting wire and the fiber optic cable through the catheter tube into the body cavity, observe any undesirable material (tissue, stone, etc.) using the fiber optic cable, and then deploy the cutting wire to deliver RF energy to the undesirable material to cut it out while observing the cut-out operation using the fiber optic cable.
According to another embodiment of the invention, the fiber optic cable and/or the catheter tube are coated with hydrophilic material.
According to yet another embodiment of the invention, the fiber optic cable may be used to carry out an optical diagnostic/treatment procedure, such as an optical biopsy.
According to still another embodiment of the invention, the fiber optic cable is integrally formed with the catheter tube.
According to a further embodiment of the invention, the catheter tube is configured to be separable from the fiber optic cable so as to be discarded after each use, while the fiber optic cable may be retained for reuse.
The foregoing aspects and many of the attendant advantages of this invention will become more readily appreciated as the same become better understood by reference to the following detailed description, when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
Referring specifically to
Still referring to
While the illustrated embodiment includes the lens 25 to focus an image for transmission through the one or more imaging fibers 20a, a lens may be omitted in some applications. For example, the distal ends of the one or more imaging fibers 20a themselves may be tapered so as to internally focus an image without an additional lens.
Referring again to
The steering cables 18 extend freely through the channels 44 from the proximal end 14 to the distal end 16 of the catheter tube 12. Alternatively, the channels 44 may extend only partially, for example to a position near the distal end 16 of the catheter tube 12 to ensure a fixed spacing between the steering cables 16 at the distal end 16. In such a case, the steering cables 18 toward the proximal end 14 of the catheter tube 12 may extend freely through a generally annular space around the fiber optic cable 20 (without being confined within any channels 44). In any case, the distal ends of the steering cables 18 are secured to the distal end 16 of the catheter tube 12 using suitable means, such as by adhesive, soldering, anchoring, or by using a suitable fastener.
Referring back to
Regardless of the particular means employed to control the steering cables 18, pulling one of the steering cables 18 results in the distal end 16 of the catheter tube 12 to bend in the direction of the pulled steering cable 18, while releasing this steering cable 18 results in the distal end 16 of the catheter tube 12 to return to its normal position (shape). Therefore, by selectively pulling (or releasing) each of the steering cables 18 at their proximal ends, using the handheld controller 27 for example, a physician can have the distal end 16 of the catheter tube 12 to bend (or bow) in various directions and in varying degrees. This permits a physician to better control the maneuvering of the catheter tube 12 and hence the imaging catheter 10 through a tortuous pass in the body cavity, without unduly twisting and damaging the fiber optic cable 20. Further, the use of multiple cables to control the distal end significantly increases the range of view of the fiber optic cable 20.
The catheter tube 12 is formed of any suitable flexible material including, but not limited to, extruded plastic such as polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE, Teflon®), polyether block amide, nylon, or a combination or blend of these. If strength is required, the catheter tube 12 may be formed of, or may be reinforced by including an additional layer formed of, over-extruded plastic, metal coil, mesh, stainless steel hypotube, etc. According to a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the distal portion of the catheter tube 12 (approximately 1-2 inches where the flexing occurs) is made more flexible (i.e., less stiff) than the remainder of the catheter tube 12. This serves to concentrate the flexing at the distal end portion rather than throughout the entire catheter tube, to achieve the desired motion (steering) of the catheter tube 12 while minimizing undue twisting of the entire catheter tube. Varying flexibility can be provided by various methods, such as by varying the durometer rating of materials that form the catheter tube 12, by varying the spacing between components (e.g., coil rings) that form or reinforce the catheter tube 12 along the length of the tube 12, etc. For example, by arranging coil rings relatively far apart from each other at a distal end portion of a catheter tube while arranging coil rings closer together in the remainder of the tube, a catheter tube having increasing flexibility toward its distal end can be obtained. In some embodiments, the flexibility may be varied along the length of a tube in two stages to form a tube consisting of a more flexible distal end portion and a less flexible remainder portion. In other embodiments, the flexibility may be varied gradually (e.g., increasingly) throughout the length of a catheter tube from its proximal end to its distal end. Some methods of varying the flexibility (or stiffness) of a catheter tube along its length are described in detail in U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 10/406,149 and 10/811,781, incorporated above.
The catheter tube having varying flexibility may be used in combination with two or more steering wires to control the distal end thereof. Alternatively, it may be used with a single steering wire, and still achieves desired control of the distal end thereof while minimizing undue twisting of the entire length of the tube.
According to some embodiments of the present invention, the overall diameter of the steerable imaging catheter 10 is from about 1.0 mm to about 4.5 mm. This range is comparable to the diameter of a conventional therapeutic/diagnostic catheter and is smaller than that of a conventional endoscope, to permit visualization of a body cavity/lumen that typically cannot be reached by an endoscope.
In one embodiment, the catheter tube 12 may be manufactured specifically to be disposable, using relatively inexpensive plastic material such as medical grade polyurethane. A disposable catheter tube is advantageous in that no sterilization of a catheter is required after each use. Once a surgical operation is completed, the fiber optic cable 20 (reusable) may be simply removed from the catheter tube 12 and the catheter tube 12 (perhaps including the steering cables 18) may be discarded. In order to protect and isolate the reusable fiber optic cable 20 from external elements during use, the distal end 16 of the disposable catheter tube 12 may include a transparent sealing cover.
According to one embodiment of the present invention, the exterior surface of the catheter tube 12 may be coated with lubricous, for example hydrophilic material so as to facilitate the placement of the catheter tube 12 inside a patient's anatomy. Additionally or alternatively, the exterior surface of the fiber optic cable 20 may be coated with lubricous, hydrophilic material so as to reduce friction and facilitate the placement of the fiber optic cable 20 through the catheter tube 12, in particular when the fiber optic cable 20 (reusable) is to be used with a disposable catheter tube 12, as described above. In some applications, hydrophilic material should be reusable so as to retain its hydrophilic properties through multiple uses (and perhaps also to withstand sterilization at least for several times). Suitable hydrophilic coating material includes polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) based material, such as those available under the trademarks of Hydropass™ and Endoglide™ from Boston Scientific Corporation of Natick, Mass. (www.bsci.com), described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,702,754 and 6,048,620, which are herein incorporated by reference. The thickness of the coating on the fiber optic cable 20 must be thin enough to permit the fiber optic cable 20 to pass through the catheter tube 12 having a specific diameter (which in turn is limited by the dimensions of the patient's anatomy), and at the same time must be thick enough to withstand abrasion and other damages. The thickness of the coating on the catheter tube 12 may be similarly determined. Coating may be applied using various methods as will be apparent to one skilled in the art, such as by dipping the fiber optic cable 20 (or the catheter tube 12) in the coating material, or spraying, painting, or printing the coating material on the fiber optic cable 20 (or the catheter tube 12).
According to one embodiment of the present invention, the fiber optic cable 20 is integrally formed with the catheter tube 12 by various means, such as by over-extruding a plastic material over the fiber optic cable 20, by adhesive, or by heat-shrinking the catheter tube 12 around the fiber optic cable 20. This will prevent removal of the fiber optic cable 20 from the catheter tube 12, which may be desirable in some applications. In such an embodiment, the distal end(s) of one or more control cables 18 may be attached directly to the distal, end of the fiber optic cable 20. If the catheter tube 12 is intended to be disposable, as described above, then the fiber optic cable 20 integrally formed therein will also be discarded together with the catheter tube 12 after each use. Alternatively, the catheter tube 12 integrally including the fiber optic cable 20 may be built for repeated use and sterilization.
Referring to
For example, referring to
In one embodiment, one of the steering cables 18 may additionally serve as the cutting wire for delivering RF energy. In this embodiment, the distal end portion of the steering cable 18 is exposed to the outside of the catheter tube 12 so as to be able to contact the undesirable material to be removed.
A steerable imaging catheter of the present invention may be passed through a working lumen of an endoscope, as described above, or may be passed through a working lumen of a non-endoscope device (e.g., biopsy forceps). Furthermore, a steerable imaging catheter of the present invention may be introduced into a body cavity of a patient adjacent to a non-endoscope device, either completely separately, or in combination such as by a snap-on type bracket provided on the side of the non-endoscope device that contains but not necessarily constrains the steerable imaging catheter.
The one or more additional lumens 51, 52 provided through a catheter tube 12 of an imaging catheter 10 may also receive a measuring probe.
The probe 66 may be made of any suitable material flexible enough to pass through a patient's anatomy and yet rigid enough to permit reading of the markings 69.
The incremental markings 69 provide a reference against which an object (e.g., stone 68) in the viewing field of the steerable imaging catheter 10 can be compared. Specifically, in operation, a physician places the incremental markings 69 provided at the distal portion of the measuring probe 66 relative to the fiber optic cable 20 so that both the object (e.g., stone) 68 and the markings 69 will be in the field of view 70. Then, the physician, using the fiber optic cable 20, visually measures the size of the object 68 in reference to the incremental markings 69 of the measuring probe 66. In this regard, in order to deliver the fiber optic cable 20 and the measuring probe 66 generally in tandem to the body cavity of interest, as illustrated, one embodiment of the catheter tube 12 defines two lumens arranged in a generally side-by-side configuration: the lumen 42 for receiving the fiber optic cable 20; and the additional lumen 51 for receiving the measuring probe 66. In one embodiment, to strictly maintain the tandem configuration, both the fiber optic cable 20 and the measuring probe 66, in a relative tandem configuration, may be fixedly secured in the catheter tube 12. Alternatively, in another embodiment, the fiber optic cable 20 and/or the measuring probe 66 freely extend through the catheter tube 12.
In accordance with one embodiment, the fiber optic cable 20 itself may be provided with the markings 69 near its distal end, which can then be viewed by another device having imaging capability (e.g., another fiber optic cable 20). Alternatively, the markings 69 may be provided on a portion of the fiber optic cable 20 near its proximal end, which does not enter the patient's body. In this embodiment, a physician can measure a distance/size by directly counting the proximal markings 69 (outside the patient's body) while inserting or pulling the fiber optic cable 20 in and out of the patient.
In accordance with one embodiment of the present invention, the fiber optic cable 20 may be configured to transmit electromagnetic energy (including both visible and non-visible ranges) for further diagnosis/treatment purposes. For example, to perform an optical biopsy, a suitable diagnostic system. (72 in
While the preferred embodiments of the invention have been illustrated and described, it will be appreciated that various changes can be made therein without departing from the scope of the invention.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/055,580, filed Oct. 16, 2013, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,215,970, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/041,520, filed Mar. 7, 2011, now abandoned, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/914,411, filed Aug. 9, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,922,654, all of which are herein incorporated by reference in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3572325 | Bazell et al. | Mar 1971 | A |
3573325 | Thominet | Mar 1971 | A |
3886933 | Mori et al. | Jun 1975 | A |
3913568 | Carpenter | Oct 1975 | A |
3941121 | Olinger et al. | Mar 1976 | A |
4027510 | Hiltebrandt | Jun 1977 | A |
4325374 | Komiya | Apr 1982 | A |
4461282 | Quchi et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
4586491 | Carpenter | May 1986 | A |
4660560 | Klein | Apr 1987 | A |
4782819 | Adair | Nov 1988 | A |
4784144 | Ono et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4790295 | Tashiro | Dec 1988 | A |
4800870 | Reid | Jan 1989 | A |
4802460 | Ohkuwa et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4802461 | Cho | Feb 1989 | A |
4807595 | Hiltebrandt | Feb 1989 | A |
4834069 | Umeda | May 1989 | A |
4882727 | Williams et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4899723 | Pajares | Feb 1990 | A |
4905667 | Foerster et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4911148 | Sosnowski et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4921326 | Wild et al. | May 1990 | A |
4945894 | Kawashima | Aug 1990 | A |
4979496 | Komi | Dec 1990 | A |
4982725 | Hibino et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5009655 | Daignault, Jr. et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5014685 | Takahashi | May 1991 | A |
5035696 | Rydell | Jul 1991 | A |
5047627 | Yim et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5098659 | Yim et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5114402 | McCoy | May 1992 | A |
5163927 | Woker et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5178130 | Kaiya | Jan 1993 | A |
5199950 | Schmitt et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5273535 | Edwards et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5299560 | Hatori | Apr 1994 | A |
5311858 | Adair | May 1994 | A |
5325845 | Adair | Jul 1994 | A |
5342299 | Snoke et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5368564 | Savage | Nov 1994 | A |
5376094 | Kline | Dec 1994 | A |
5379779 | Rowland et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5383467 | Auer et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5396880 | Kagan et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5403311 | Abele et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5409453 | Lundquist et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5412749 | Sayegh et al. | May 1995 | A |
5415158 | Barthel et al. | May 1995 | A |
5423003 | Berteau | Jun 1995 | A |
5439000 | Gunderson et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
D363544 | Rowland et al. | Oct 1995 | S |
D363776 | Rowland et al. | Oct 1995 | S |
5456245 | Bornhop | Oct 1995 | A |
5478338 | Reynard | Dec 1995 | A |
5531687 | Snoke et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5546577 | Marlin et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5569161 | Ebling et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5601087 | Gunderson et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5624397 | Snoke et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5647840 | D'Amelio et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5667472 | Finn et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5680615 | Marlin et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5702754 | Zhong | Dec 1997 | A |
5733242 | Rayburn et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5746692 | Bacich et al. | May 1998 | A |
5758074 | Marlin et al. | May 1998 | A |
5778377 | Marlin et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5779643 | Lum et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5803898 | Bashour | Sep 1998 | A |
5824026 | Diaz | Oct 1998 | A |
5860914 | Chiba et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5867714 | Todd et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5879287 | Yoshihashi | Mar 1999 | A |
5910129 | Koblish et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5926636 | Lam et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5928137 | Green | Jul 1999 | A |
5938588 | Grabover et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5960145 | Sanchez | Sep 1999 | A |
5961599 | Kalavade et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5968116 | Day, II et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5976129 | Desai | Nov 1999 | A |
5991806 | McHann, Jr. | Nov 1999 | A |
5993378 | Lemelson | Nov 1999 | A |
5993447 | Blewett et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6007522 | Agro et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6007531 | Snoke et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6012100 | Frailong et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6013025 | Bonne et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6017322 | Snoke et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6021445 | Chapa | Feb 2000 | A |
6026354 | Singh et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6038611 | Masel | Mar 2000 | A |
6044408 | Engstrom et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6048620 | Zhong | Apr 2000 | A |
6052727 | Kamalanathan | Apr 2000 | A |
6055562 | Devarakonda et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6081740 | Gombrich et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6096009 | Windheuser et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6126633 | Kaji et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6174291 | McMahon et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6203494 | Moriyama | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6228032 | Eaton et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6277064 | Yoon | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6296608 | Daniels et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6328730 | Harkrider | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6349357 | Chong, Jr. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6350234 | Foerster-Klein et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6397259 | Lincke et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6398776 | Sekino et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6400157 | Bonanni et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6442611 | Navarre et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6544215 | Bencini et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6554766 | Maeda et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6589163 | Aizama et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6626824 | Ruegg et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6654630 | Zuluaga et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6673012 | Fujii et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6702750 | Yock | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6752800 | Winston et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6796939 | Hirata et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6814698 | Barthel et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6837849 | Ogura et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6966906 | Brown | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6979290 | Mourlas et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6994667 | Singh | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7198599 | Goto et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7223230 | Zirps et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7232434 | Suyama et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7235043 | Gellman et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7413543 | Banik et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7615032 | Whittaker et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7662089 | Okada et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7914441 | Otawara | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7922654 | Boutillette et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
20020013532 | Czubko et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020026188 | Balbierz et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020068851 | Gravenstein et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020087047 | Remijan et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020111548 | Swanson et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020115983 | Sekino et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020168317 | Daighighian et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020188177 | Miyanaga | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020188285 | Brown | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030004460 | Bedell | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030028200 | Berg et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030078475 | Hirata et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030083552 | Remijan et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030088153 | Carrillo, Jr. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030153813 | Kasel et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030212308 | Bendall | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030216616 | Krupa et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040015050 | Goto et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040052679 | Root et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040077950 | Marshik-Geurts et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040116800 | Helfer et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040172052 | Fogarty et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040199052 | Banik et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040220449 | Zirps et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040225187 | Kamrava et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040254422 | Singh | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050165288 | Rioux et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050177024 | Mackin | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050182292 | Suzuki | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050192480 | Toriya et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050278010 | Richardson | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060089660 | Saeed et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060149129 | Watts et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060252993 | Freed et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060258955 | Hoffman et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20080064925 | Gill et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080097159 | Ishiguro | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20100198009 | Farr et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 754 429 | Jan 1997 | EP |
0 815 895 | Jan 1998 | EP |
1 302 151 | Apr 2003 | EP |
1 502 537 | Feb 2005 | EP |
1 568 305 | Aug 2005 | EP |
1 842 499 | Oct 2007 | EP |
04-354926 | Dec 1992 | JP |
3004466 | Nov 1994 | JP |
8-501949 | Mar 1996 | JP |
10-057500 | Mar 1998 | JP |
11-313827 | Nov 1999 | JP |
2000-121962 | Apr 2000 | JP |
2000-157486 | Jun 2000 | JP |
2002-521114 | Jul 2002 | JP |
2002-272675 | Sep 2002 | JP |
2004-049891 | Feb 2004 | JP |
2004-503339 | Feb 2004 | JP |
2004-533864 | Nov 2004 | JP |
2005-052630 | Mar 2005 | JP |
2005-514992 | May 2005 | JP |
2005-169012 | Jun 2005 | JP |
2006-015017 | Jan 2006 | JP |
2007-535972 | Dec 2007 | JP |
WO 9111213 | Aug 1991 | WO |
WO 9401162 | Jan 1994 | WO |
WO 9411040 | May 1994 | WO |
WO 9729679 | Aug 1997 | WO |
WO 9940432 | Aug 1999 | WO |
WO 9945847 | Sep 1999 | WO |
WO 0006013 | Feb 2000 | WO |
WO 0156457 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO 0178825 | Oct 2001 | WO |
WO 0189598 | Nov 2001 | WO |
WO 0205885 | Jan 2002 | WO |
WO 03059429 | Jul 2003 | WO |
WO 03082394 | Oct 2003 | WO |
WO 2004007012 | Jan 2004 | WO |
WO 2004012805 | Feb 2004 | WO |
WO 2006004053 | Jan 2006 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Satyanarayanan, “Fundamental Challenges in Mobile Computing,” School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, 7 pp. |
Duchamp, “Issues in Wireless Mobile Computing,” Computer Science Department, Columbia University, 7 pp. (unnumbered). |
de Lara et al., “Opportunities for Bandwidth Adaptation in Microsoft Office Documents,” Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Department of Computer Science, Rice University, 12 pp. (unnumbered). |
de Lara et al., “Puppeteer: Component-based Adaptation for Mobile Computing,” Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Department of Computer Science, Rice University, 12 pp. |
Noble et al., “A Research Status Report on Adaptation for Mobile Data Access,” School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, 6 pp. (unnumbered). |
Joseph et al., “Rover: A toolkit for Mobile Information Access,” appears in Proceedings of the Fifteenth Symposium on Operating Systems Principles, Dec. 1995, 16 pp. |
Andersen et al., “System Support for Bandwidth Management and Content Adaptation in Internet Applications,” M.I.T. Laboratory for Computer Science, 14 pp. (unnumbered). |
Bagrodia et al., “Vision, Issues, and Architecture for Nomadic Computing,” 27 pp. |
Satyanarayanan et al., “Visual Proxy: Exploiting OS Customizations without Application Source Code,” School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, 5 pp. |
Katz, “Adaptation and Mobility in Wireless Information Systems,” IEEE Personal Communications, First Quarter 1994, pp. 6-17. |
Fox et al., “Adapting to Network and Client Variability via On-Demand Dynamic Distillation,” University of California at Berkeley, pp. 1-11. |
Fox et al., “Adapting to Network and Client Variation Using Infrastructural Proxies: Lessons and Perspectives,” University of California at Berkeley, 15 pp. (unnumbered). |
Noble et al., “Agile Application-Aware Adaptation for Mobility,” to appear in the Proceedings of the 16th ACM Symposium on Operating System Principles, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, 12 pp. (unnumbered). |
Joseph et al., “Building Reliable Mobile-Aware Applications using the Rover Toolkit,” appears in Proceedings of the 2nd ACM International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, Nov. 1996, 13 pp. (unnumbered). |
Forman et al., “The Challenges of Mobile Computing,” University of Washington, available as UW CSE Tech Report # 93-11-03 from ftp.cs.washington.edu (16 pp). An edited version of this paper has been accepted for publication in IEEE Computer. |
Cunha et al., “Characteristics of WWW Client-based Traces,” Computer Science Department, Boston University, BU-CS-95-010, Jul. 18, 1995, 18 pp. |
Kistler et al., “Disconnected Operation in the Coda File System,” ACM Transactions on Computer Systems, vol. 10, No. 1, Feb. 1992, pp. 3-25. |
Kaashoek et al., “Dynamic Documents: Mobile Wireless Access to the WWW,” MIT Laboratory for Computer Science, to appear in Proceedings of the IEEE Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications, Santa Cruz, CA, Dec. 1994, 6 pp. |
Mummert et al., “Exploiting Weak Connectivity for Mobile File Access,” Carnegie Mellon University, SIGOPS '95 Dec. 1995 CO, USA, pp. 143-155. |
Myers et al., “Extending the Windows Desktop Interface With Connected Handheld Computers,” Human Computer Interaction Institute, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, submitted for publication, pp. 1-10. |
A communication from the Japanese Patent Office citing the above Japanese Patents in Patent Application No. 2007-505103, dated Nov. 10, 2009. |
An English language version of a communication from the Japanese Patent Office citing the above Japanese Patents in Patent Application No. 2007-505103, dated Mar. 29, 2010. |
A communication from the Japanese Patent Office citing the above Japanese Patents in Patent Application No. 2007-525748, dated Aug. 10, 2011. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160073857 A1 | Mar 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14055580 | Oct 2013 | US |
Child | 14945817 | US | |
Parent | 13041520 | Mar 2011 | US |
Child | 14055580 | US | |
Parent | 10914411 | Aug 2004 | US |
Child | 13041520 | US |