1. Field of the Invention
The present invention is related to fiber optic local convergence points and associated fiber optic hardware, and more particularly, to fiber optic local convergence points adapted for multiple dwelling units.
2. Description of Related Art
To provide improved performance to subscribers, fiber optic networks are increasingly providing optical fiber connectivity directly to the subscribers. As part of various fiber-to-the-premises (FTTP), fiber-to-the-home (FTTH), and other initiatives (generally described as FTTX), such fiber optic networks are providing the optical signals from distribution cables through local convergence points (“LCPs”) to fiber optic cables, such as drop cables, that are run directly to the subscribers' premises. Such optical connectivity is increasingly being provided to multiple dwelling units (“MDUs”) in part because of the relatively large density of subscribers located in an MDU.
MDUs include apartments, condominiums, townhouses, dormitories, hotels/motels, office buildings, factories, and any other collection of subscriber locations that are in relatively close proximity to one another. MDUs typically are all provided in a single indoor environment, such as an office or condominium; however, MDUs may also include a plurality of individual structures, such as apartment complexes. Typically, if an MDU comprises multiple structures, the optical fibers extending between the structures are adapted for outdoor environments, whereas the optical fibers extending within the structures are adapted for indoor environments. Most conventional MDUs include an LCP located in a generally central and selectively accessible location, such as the basement, utility closet, or the like, or the LCP may be located outside the MDU on an exterior wall, in a pedestal, in a handhole, or the like. The LCP includes at least one fiber optic cable that optically connects to a distribution cable. The LCP also includes a connection point where the subscriber cables routed through the building are optically connected to the distribution cable.
Conventional LCPs for such MDUs are generally sized according to the number of subscribers to be serviced through the LCP, and many of the high density MDUs require large, expensive LCPs that may be difficult to install and/or transport. In addition, conventional LCPs often require skilled technicians to install the LCP and route the associated subscriber cables. Furthermore, highly skilled technicians are required to optically connect, often by splicing, the distribution cable to the LCP and to optically connect and route the subscriber cables to the LCP. Therefore, a need exists for LCPs that are cost-effective, are relatively small in size, and may be installed and maintained by relatively unskilled technicians.
The various embodiments of the present invention address the above needs and achieve other advantages by providing LCPs and associated fiber optic hardware components that provide optical connectivity to relatively large numbers of subscribers using relative small fiber optic hardware components. In addition, some embodiments of the present invention enable installation of the LCPs and associated components by relatively unskilled technicians by removing the need to splice any of the connections between the distribution cable and the subscriber location and by providing optical fibers having significantly smaller minimum bend radii to provide more versatility when routing the subscriber cables through the building.
In one embodiment of the present invention, a fiber optic local convergence point (“LCP”) adapted for use with a multiple dwelling unit is provided. The LCP is adapted to optically connect at least one optical fiber of a distribution cable to at least one subscriber optical fiber. The LCP comprises a housing having an interior cavity defined by a plurality of sides and by a cover that is selectively moveable from an opened position to a closed position to thereby provide access to the interior cavity when the cover is in the opened position. The housing also includes at least one surface adapted for mounting the LCP to a structure, and the housing further comprises at least one opening through the housing for the passage of at least one optical fiber. The LCP also comprises a cable assembly with a connector end adapted for optical connection to the at least one optical fiber of the distribution cable and with a splitter end generally opposite the connector end of the cable assembly. The splitter end of the cable assembly defines a casing with an exterior surface that defines a plurality of receptacles adapted to selectively receive fiber optic connectors that are optically connected to the subscriber optical fiber. The connector end of the cable assembly is optically connected to the splitter end with at least one cable assembly optical fiber. In addition, the splitter end comprises at least one splitter that optically connects the cable assembly optical fiber with the plurality of receptacles. The splitter end of the cable assembly is adapted to be removably received within the housing of the LCP, and the splitter end is adapted to be received within the housing without opening the casing of the splitter end
Further embodiments of the present invention provide a cable assembly adapted for use in a multiple dwelling unit to optically connect at least one optical fiber of a distribution cable to at least one subscriber optical fiber. The cable assembly comprising a connector end adapted for optical connection to the at least one optical fiber of the distribution cable and with a splitter end generally opposite the connector end of the cable assembly. The splitter end of the cable assembly defines a casing with an exterior surface that defines a plurality of receptacles adapted to selectively receive fiber optic connectors that are optically connected to the subscriber optical fiber. The connector end of the cable assembly is optically connected to the splitter end with at least one cable assembly optical fiber. In addition, the splitter end comprises at least one splitter that optically connects the cable assembly optical fiber with the plurality of receptacles. Some embodiments of the present invention include at least one microstructured optical fiber in the cable assembly. The microstructured optical fiber comprises a core region and a cladding region surrounding the core region, the cladding region comprises an annular hole-containing region comprised of non-periodically disposed holes. The microstructured fiber of some embodiments of the present invention has an 8 mm macrobend induced loss at 1550 nm of less than 0.2 dB/turn.
Still further embodiments provide related fiber optic hardware adapted for use in MDUs and other facilities. For example, the present invention provides fiber optic splice tray assemblies defining a density of splice holders per unit of volume of the splice tray assembly of at least 5 single splices/in3 and/or at least 10 mass fusion splices/in3, fiber optic splitter modules that includes a splitter axis orthogonal to an opening axis and/or that define a density of splits per unit volume of the housing of at least 5 splits/in3, fiber optic routing guides adapted to store an amount of length of optical fiber (900 μm diameter) per unit of volume of a housing of at least 10 in/in3, and fiber distribution terminals (“FDTs”) defining a density of fiber optic output receptacles per unit of volume of the housing of at least 10 receptacles/in3 for an input subscriber optical cable and of at least 6 receptacles/in3 for a connectorized input subscriber optical cable. All of these fiber optic hardware components provide a significant improvement to the comparable conventional components, thus allowing them to be inure easily handled and allowing them to be installed in a greater number of locations based upon the network's requirements and/or the technician's preferences. Therefore, the LCPs, cable assemblies, FDTs, and other components of various embodiments of the present invention provide for cost-effective, reduced-size, and easily-installed fiber optic networks for MDUs.
Having thus described the invention in general terms, reference will now be made to the accompanying drawings, which are not necessarily drawn to scale and are meant to be illustrative and not limiting, and wherein:
The present invention now will be described more fully hereinafter with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which some, but not all embodiments of the invention are shown. Indeed, the invention may be embodied in many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein; rather, these embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will satisfy applicable legal requirements. Although apparatus and methods for providing local convergence points (“LCPs”) for multiple dwelling units (“MDUs”) are described and shown in the accompanying drawings with regard to specific types of LCPs and associated fiber optic hardware, it is envisioned that the functionality of the various apparatus and methods may be applied to any now known or hereafter devised LCPs and associated fiber optic hardware in which it is desired to provide optical connectivity for MDUs. Like numbers refer to like elements throughout.
With reference to
Turning now to the LCP 10 of
The LCP 10 of
The cable assembly optical fiber 22 of
The splitter end 32 of the cable assembly 30 of the LCP 10 of
Turning again to the LCP 10 of the illustrated embodiments, receipt of the splitter end 32 into the housing 12 is illustrated in
The LCP 50 of
Turning now to the LCP 70 of
In addition to providing convenient installation of the LCP within and/or near the MDU, the LCPs of certain embodiments of the present invention also provide improved density of connections, which significantly reduces the cost of the hardware and enables technicians to more easily install the LCP and associated fiber optic hardware and to increase the possible places the LCP and associated fiber optic hardware may be installed and/or mounted. Whereas prior art LCPs generally define a width of 13.5 inches, a height of 15.5 inches, and a depth of 5.5 inches along the exterior of the LCP while providing only 48 receptacles for subscriber optical fibers, the LCPs of the illustrated embodiments of the present invention generally define a width of 9.8 inches, a height of 12.6 inches, and a depth of 3.8 inches while providing 288 receptacles for subscriber optical fibers. Therefore, the prior art LCPs define a density of receptacles per unit of volume of the housing of about 0.042 receptacles/in3, and the LCPs of the illustrated embodiments define a density of receptacles per unit of volume of the housing of about 0.614 receptacles/in3, which is a significant improvement in density that can be used to provide smaller LCPs and/or provide additional optical connectivity with the LCPs of the present invention. Various embodiments of the present invention preferably provide a density of receptacles per unit of volume of the housing from about 0.10 receptacles/in3 to about 4.0 receptacles/in3, more preferably a density of receptacles per unit of volume of the housing from about 0.25 receptacles/in3 to about 2.0 receptacles/in3, and still more preferably a density of receptacles per unit of volume of the housing from about 0.50 receptacles/in3 to about 1.0 receptacles/in3.
The LCPs of
Turning now to the FDTs of
The FDT 140 of
Referring now to the FDTs of
Similar to the direct cable input FDT 140 of
Referring now to the multi-fiber connector input FDTs of
Based in part upon the use of the microstructured optical fiber described below, the splice tray assembly 220 is adapted to provide a significant improvement in the density of splices per unit of volume of the splice tray assembly, thus reducing the size, number, and/or costs of splice tray assemblies required for a particular application. Whereas prior art splice tray assemblies 236 generally define along the exterior a width of 3.94 inches, a length of 9.34 inches, and a depth of 0.4 inches while providing 24 splice holders, the splice tray assembly of the illustrated embodiment of the present invention generally defines along the exterior a width of 2.44 inches, a length of 6.34 inches, and a depth of 0.4 inches while providing 24 splice holders. Therefore, the prior art splice tray assemblies define a density of splice holders per unit of volume of the splice tray assembly of about 1.63 single splices/in3 and about 3.26 mass fusion splices/in3, and the splice tray assembly of the illustrated embodiment defines a density of splice holders per unit of volume of the splice tray assembly of about 3.87 single splices/in3 and about 7.76 mass fusion splices/in3. Various embodiments of the present invention preferably provide a density of splice holders per unit of volume of the splice tray assembly of at least 3 single splices/in3 or at least 6 mass fusion splices/in3, more preferably a density of splice holders per unit of volume of the splice tray assembly of at least 5 single splices/in3 or at least 10 mass fusion splices/in3, and still more preferably a density of splice holders per unit of volume of the splice tray assembly of at least 8 single splices/in3 or at least 16 mass fusion splices/in3.
Turning now to the fiber optic splitter module 240 of
Also based in part upon the use of the microstructured optical fiber described below, the splitter module 240 is adapted to provide a significant improvement in the density of output optical fiber splits per unit of volume of the splitter module housing, thus reducing the size, number, and/or costs of splitter modules required for a particular application. Whereas prior art splitter module 256 generally defines along the exterior a width of 3.07 inches, a length of 4.85 inches, and a depth of 0.92 inches while providing 32 output fiber splits, the splice tray assembly of the illustrated embodiment of the present invention generally defines along the exterior a width of 3.47 inches, a length of 1.83 inches, and a depth of 0.83 inches while providing 32 output fiber splits. Therefore, the prior art splice tray assemblies define a density of output optical fiber splits per unit of volume of the splitter module housing of about 2.34 splits/in3, and the splice tray assembly of the illustrated embodiment density of output optical fiber splits per unit of volume of the splitter module housing of about 6.07 splits/in3. Various embodiments of the present invention preferably provide a density of output optical fiber splits per unit of volume of the splitter module housing of about 4 splits/in3 to about 10 splits/in3, more preferably a density of output optical fiber splits per unit of volume of the splitter module housing of about 5 splits/in3 to about 8 splits/in3, and still more preferably a density of output optical fiber splits per unit of volume of the splitter module housing of about 6 splits/in3 to about 7 splits/in3. It should be appreciated that the numbers given above are for 1×32 splitters and that additional splitter modules of the present invention generally define the same volume while including alternative numbers of splits, such that the amounts given above should be adjusted accordingly based upon the splitter ratio of the actual splitter(s) used in the splitter module.
Turning now to the fiber optic routing guide 260 of
Based in part upon the use of the microstructured optical fiber described below, the routing guide 260 of
Various embodiments of the present invention are adapted so to include bend performance optical fibers. One example of bend performance optical fiber is a microstructured optical fiber having a core region and a cladding region surrounding the core region, the cladding region comprising an annular hole-containing region comprised of non-periodically disposed holes such that the optical fiber is capable of single mode transmission at one or more wavelengths in one or more operating wavelength ranges. The core region and cladding region provide improved bend resistance, and single mode operation at wavelengths preferably greater than or equal to 1500 nm, in some embodiments also greater than about 1310 nm, in other embodiments also greater than 1260 nm. The optical fibers provide a mode field at a wavelength of 1310 nm preferably greater than 8.0 microns, more preferably between about 8.0 and 10.0 microns. In preferred embodiments, optical fiber disclosed herein is thus single-mode transmission optical fiber.
In some embodiments present invention, the microstructured optical fibers disclosed herein comprises a core region disposed about a longitudinal centerline and a cladding region surrounding the core region, the cladding region comprising an annular hole-containing region comprised of non-periodically disposed holes, wherein the annular hole-containing region has a maximum radial width of less than 12 microns, the annular hole-containing region has a regional void area percent of less than about 30 percent, and the non-periodically disposed holes have a mean diameter of less than 1550 nm.
By “non-periodically disposed” or “non-periodic distribution”, it is meant that when one takes a cross-section (such as a cross-section perpendicular to the longitudinal axis) of the optical fiber, the non-periodically disposed holes are randomly or non-periodically distributed across a portion of the fiber. Similar cross sections taken at different points along the length of the fiber will reveal different cross-sectional hole patterns, i.e., various cross-sections will have different hole patterns, wherein the distributions of holes and sizes of holes do not match. That is, the holes are non-periodic, i.e., they are not periodically disposed within the fiber structure. These holes are stretched (elongated) along the length (i.e. in a direction generally parallel to the longitudinal axis) of the optical fiber, but do not extend the entire length of the entire fiber for typical lengths of transmission fiber.
For a variety of applications, it is desirable for the holes to be formed such that greater than about 95% of and preferably all of the holes exhibit a mean hole size in the cladding for the optical fiber which is less than 1550 nm, more preferably less than 775 nm, most preferably less than 390 nm. Likewise, it is preferable that the maximum diameter of the holes in the fiber be less than 7000 nm, more preferably less than 2000 nm, and even more preferably less than 1550 mm, and most preferably less than 775 nm. In some embodiments, the fibers disclosed herein have fewer than 5000 holes, in some embodiments also fewer than 1000 holes, and in other embodiments the total number of holes is fewer than 500 holes in a given optical fiber perpendicular cross-section. Of course, the most preferred fibers will exhibit combinations of these characteristics. Thus, for example, one particularly preferred embodiment of optical fiber would exhibit fewer than 200 holes in the optical fiber, the holes having a maximum diameter less than 1550 nm and a mean diameter less than 775 nm, although useful and bend resistant optical fibers can be achieved using larger and greater numbers of holes. The hole number, mean diameter, max diameter, and total void area percent of holes can all be calculated with the help of a scanning electron microscope at a magnification of about 800× and image analysis software, such as ImagePro, which is available from Media Cybernetics, Inc. of Silver Spring, Md., USA.
The optical fibers disclosed herein may or may not include germania or fluorine to also adjust the refractive index of the core and or cladding of the optical fiber, but these dopants can also be avoided in the intermediate annular region and instead, the holes (in combination with any gas or gases that may be disposed within the holes) can be used to adjust the manner in which light is guided down the core of the fiber. The hole-containing region may consist of undoped (pure) silica, thereby completely avoiding the use of any dopants in the hole-containing region, to achieve a decreased refractive index, or the hole-containing region may comprise doped silica, e.g. fluorine-doped silica having a plurality of holes.
In one set of embodiments, the core region includes doped silica to provide a positive refractive index relative to pure silica, e.g. germania doped silica. The core region is preferably hole-free. In some embodiments, the core region comprises a single core segment having a positive maximum refractive index relative to pure silica Δ1 in %, and the single core segment extends from the centerline to a radius R1. In one set of embodiments, 0.30%<Δ1<0.40%, and 3.0 μm<R1<5.0 μm. In some embodiments, the single core segment has a refractive index profile with an alpha shape, where alpha is 6 or more, and in some embodiments alpha is 8 or more. In some embodiments, the inner annular hole-free region extends from the core region to a radius R2, wherein the inner annular hole-free region has a radial width W12, equal to R2-R1, and W12 is greater than 1 μm. Radius R2 is preferably greater than 5 μm, more preferably greater than 6 μm. The intermediate annular hole-containing region extends radially outward from R2 to radius R3 and has a radial width W23, equal to R3-R2. The outer annular region 186 extends radially outward from R3 to radius R4. Radius R4 is the outermost radius of the silica portion of the optical fiber. One or more coatings may be applied to the external surface of the silica portion of the optical fiber, starting at R4, the outermost diameter or outermost periphery of the glass part of the fiber. The core region and the cladding region are preferably comprised of silica. The core region is preferably silica doped with one or more dopants. Preferably, the core region is hole-free. The hole-containing region has an inner radius R2 which is not more than 20 μm. In sonic embodiments, R2 is not less than 10 μm and not greater than 20 μm. In other embodiments, R2 is not less than 10 μm and not greater than 18 μm. In other embodiments, R2 is not less than 10 μm and not greater than 14 μm. Again, while not being limited to any particular width, the hole-containing region has a radial width W23 which is not less than 0.5 μm. In some embodiments, W23 is not less than 0.5 μm and not greater than 20 μm. In other embodiments, W23 is not less than 2 μm and not greater than 12 μm. In other embodiments, W23 is not less than 2 μm and not greater than 10 μm.
Such fiber can be made to exhibit a fiber cutoff of less than 1400 nm, more preferably less than 1310 nm, a 20 mm macrobend induced loss at 1550 nm of less than 1 dB/turn, preferably less than 0.5 dB/turn, even more preferably less than 0.1 dB/turn, still more preferably less than 0.05 dB/turn, yet more preferably less than 0.03 dB/turn, and even still more preferably less than 0.02 dB/turn, a 12 mm macrobend induced loss at 1550 nm of less than 5 dB/turn, preferably less than 1 dB/turn, more preferably less than 0.5 dB/turn, even more preferably less than 0.2 dB/turn, still more preferably less than 0.01 dB/turn, still even more preferably less than 0.05 dB/turn, and a 8 mm macrobend induced loss at 1550 nm of less than 5 dB/turn, preferably less than 1 dB/turn, more preferably less than 0.5 dB/turn, and even more preferably less than 0.2 dB-turn, and still even more preferably less than 0.1 dB/turn.
The fiber of some embodiments of the present invention comprises a core region that is surrounded by a cladding region that comprises randomly disposed voids which are contained within an annular region spaced from the core and positioned to be effective to guide light along the core region. Other optical fibers and microstructured fibers may be used in the present invention. Additional features of the microstructured optical fibers of additional embodiments of the present invention are described more fully in pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/583,098 filed Oct. 18, 2006, and provisional U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 60/817,863 filed Jun. 30, 2006; 60/817,721 filed Jun. 30, 2006; 60/841,458 filed Aug. 31, 2006; and 60/841,490 filed Aug. 31, 2006; all of which are assigned to Corning Incorporated and the disclosures of which are incorporated by reference herein.
Many modifications and other embodiments of the invention set forth herein will come to mind to one skilled in the art to which the invention pertains having the benefit of the teachings presented in the foregoing descriptions and the associated drawings. Therefore, it is to be understood that the invention is not to be limited to the specific embodiments disclosed and that modifications and other embodiments are intended to be included within the scope of the appended claims. It is intended that the present invention cover the modifications and variations of this invention provided they come within the scope of the appended claims and their equivalents. Although specific terms are employed herein, they are used in a generic and descriptive sense only and not for purposes of limitation.
The present application is a Continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 11/653,137 filed on Jan, 12, 2007 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,349,616 issued Mar. 25, 2008, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4792203 | Nelson et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4844573 | Gillham et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4948220 | Violo et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
5100221 | Carney et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5187766 | Finzel et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5249252 | Noto | Sep 1993 | A |
5260957 | Hakimi et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5274731 | White | Dec 1993 | A |
5363440 | Daoud | Nov 1994 | A |
5402515 | Vidacovich et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5421532 | Richter | Jun 1995 | A |
D362255 | White | Sep 1995 | S |
5548678 | Frost et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5655044 | Finzel et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5668911 | Debortoll | Sep 1997 | A |
5734776 | Puetz | Mar 1998 | A |
5778131 | Llewellyn et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5790741 | Vincent et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5881200 | Burt | Mar 1999 | A |
5946440 | Puetz | Aug 1999 | A |
6061492 | Strause et al. | May 2000 | A |
6157714 | Daoud | Dec 2000 | A |
6160946 | Thompson et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6256444 | Bechamps et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6259851 | Daoud | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6263141 | Smith | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6282360 | Milanowski et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6356697 | Braga et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6363200 | Thompson et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6385381 | Janus et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6424781 | Puetz et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6532332 | Solheid et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6535579 | Blake et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6535682 | Puetz et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6556763 | Puetz et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6577801 | Broderick et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6584267 | Caveney et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6614978 | Caveney | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6631237 | Knudsen et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6633717 | Knight et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6661961 | Allen et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6710366 | Lee et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6711339 | Puetz et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6760531 | Solheid et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6766094 | Smith et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6788786 | Kessler et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6792191 | Clapp, Jr. et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6795552 | Stanush et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6796437 | Krampotich et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6802724 | Mahony | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6810194 | Griffiths et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6815612 | Bloodworth et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6850685 | Tinucci et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6925241 | Bohle et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6968107 | Belardi et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6983095 | Reagan et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7054513 | Herz et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7083051 | Smith et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7086539 | Knudsen et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7086898 | Johnsen et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7088899 | Reagan et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7090084 | Knudsen et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7102884 | Mertesdorf et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7103255 | Reagan et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7139461 | Puetz et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7142764 | Allen et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7146089 | Reagan et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7149398 | Solheid et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7171100 | Solheid et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7171102 | Reagan et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7173183 | McMahon et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7194181 | Holmberg et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7200317 | Reagan et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7218827 | Vongseng et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7218828 | Feustel et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7233731 | Solheid et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7245809 | Gniadek et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7277620 | Vongseng et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7295747 | Solheid et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7298952 | Allen et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7330546 | Kessler et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7330626 | Kowalczyk et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7333707 | Puetz et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7349616 | Castonguay et al. | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7359610 | Vongseng | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7366391 | Ellison et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7369741 | Reagan et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7400816 | Reagan et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7406242 | Braga | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7409138 | Frazier et al. | Aug 2008 | B1 |
7418181 | Zimmel et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7421183 | Vongseng | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7548680 | Castonguay et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
20020181925 | Hodge et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20040001686 | Smith et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040228598 | Allen et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050021391 | Lu et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050021392 | English et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050129379 | Reagan et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050213921 | Mertesdorf et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060008231 | Reagan et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060083461 | Takahaski et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060193586 | Hoehne et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060263029 | Mudd et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060275008 | Xin | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070003205 | Saravanos et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070036503 | Solheid et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070165995 | Reagan et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070189691 | Barth et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070192817 | Landry et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070212010 | Caveney | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080008436 | Reagan et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080013910 | Reagan et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080019655 | Vongseng et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080025684 | Vongseng et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080031585 | Solheid et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080042536 | Guzzo et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080075411 | Solheid et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080079341 | Anderson et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080080825 | Leon et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080080826 | Leon et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080080827 | Leon et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080080828 | Leon et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080080829 | Smith et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080093101 | Kessler et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080116153 | Smith et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080124038 | Kowalczyk et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080124039 | Gniadek et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080170833 | Castonguay et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080212928 | Kowalczyk et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080219633 | Smith et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0744640 | Nov 1996 | EP |
0744640 | Aug 2006 | EP |
62-27312 | Feb 1987 | JP |
WO 9506347 | Mar 1995 | WO |
WO 2004086112 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO 2005050277 | Jun 2005 | WO |
WO 2005088373 | Sep 2005 | WO |
WO 2006050505 | May 2006 | WO |
WO2006127457 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO 2006135524 | Dec 2006 | WO |
WO 2008088675 | Jul 2008 | WO |
WO 2008112179 | Sep 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Patent Cooperation Treaty, International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2008/03128, Feb. 7, 2008. |
International Telecommunication Union, ITU-T G.652, Telecommunication Standardization Sector of ITU, Jun. 2005, Series G: Transmission Systems and Media, Digital Systems and Networks, Transmission media characteristics—Optical fibre cables, Characteristics of a single-mode optical fibre and cable, ITU-T Recommendation G.652, 22 pgs. |
International Telecommunication Union, ITU-T G.657, Telecommunication Standardization Sector of ITU, Dec. 2006, Series G: Transmission Systems and Media, Digital Systems and Networks, Transmission media and optical systems characteristics—Optical Fibre Cables, Characteristics of a bending loss insensitive single mode optical fibre and cable for the access network, ITU-T Recommendation G.657, 20 pgs. |
Monro et al., “Holey Fibers with random cladding distributions” Optic Letters, vol. 25, No. 4; Feb. 15, 2000. |
Pickrell et al., “Novel Techniques for the Fabrication of Holey Optical Fibers” Spie Conference Proceedings, vol. 4578, pp. 271-282; 2001. |
Penn Well Corporation, “Bringing Fiber to the multi-dwelling unit”, reprinted with revisions to format, from the Oct. 2005 edition of Cabling Installation & Maintenance, Copyright 2005. |
Corning Cable Systems LLC, Product Information Sheet, OptiTect™ Premier Local Convergence Cabinet, An Evolant © Solutions Product, Sep. 2006, 6 pages. |
FONS, Fiber Optic Network Solutions, “Fiber Distribution Terminals”, Fiber Access Terminals, Copyright © FONS Corp. 2005, www.fons.com, 3 pages. |
FONS, Fiber Optic Network Solutions, “Indoor Fiber Distribution Terminal”, “Interior Wall Mount Terminals”, Copyright © FONS Corp. 2005, www.fons.com, 3 pages. |
ADC Spec Sheet “OmniReach™ FTTX Solutions”, “Outdoor Fiber Distribution Terminal 24 (OFDT-24)”, 103335AE, Jan. 2007 Revision © 2006, 2007 www.adc.com, 4 pages. |
ADC Spec Sheet “OmniReach™ FTTX Solutions”, “Indoor Fiber Distribution Terminal”, 103266AE, Aug. 2006 Revision © 2006 www.adc.com, 4 pages. |
ADC Catalog “OmniReach™ FTTP Solutions”, “Fiber Distribution Terminals”, “FTTP Infrastructure Solutions”, “Fiberglass In-Ground Mounting Sleeve”, “Above Ground Cabinet Mounting”, “Pad or Pole Mounting”, “Accessories”, 1276550 Apr. 2004, Revision © 2003, 2004 www.adc.com, 12 pages. |
Emerson product sheet, “NetSpan™ Fiber Distribution Hub Fiber Cross-Connect Enclosure”, “Outside Plant for Business Continuity”, © 2006 Emerson Network Power Energy Systems, North America, www.EmersonNetworkPower.com/Energy—Systems.Com, 2 pages. |
SPC TelEquip product sheet, “FiberGard Distribution Terminal 48 Fiber-Indoor/Outdoor”, “The compact solution for fiber provisioning”, www.spc.net/2005/Fiber%/20Optics%20FiberGard%20Dist%20Term%2048.html. |
Hitachi Cable Review No. 24 “Low-low Holey Fiber”, Aug. 2005, 5 pages. |
Draka Comteq/Optical Fibre, Issue Date: Aug. 2006, Supercedes: -/-, “BendBrightXS Single Mode Optical Fibre, Enhances low macrobending sensitive, low water peak fibre, Product Type: G.652D, Coating Type: ColorLock™ and Natural”, www.drakafibre.com www.draka.com, 2 pages. |
Corning Cable Systems, SRP-009-005, “Installation Instructions for the IBM Fiber Transport System-III (FTS-III),” Issue 1, Jun. 1994, 15 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2008/000095 (Sep. 12, 2008). |
Office Action for Australian Patent Application No. 2008226892 (May 19, 2011). |
Office Action for Australian Patent Application No. 2008226892 (Sep. 7, 2011). |
Office Action for Canadian Patent Application No. 2,679,996 (Nov. 30, 2011). |
Office Action for Canadian Patent Application No. 2,754,111 (Nov. 29, 2011). |
Office Action for Canadian Patent Application No. 2,754,149 (Nov. 29, 2011). |
ADC, “OmniReach FTTX Solutions. Passive Optical Splitter Modules. 6th Edition,” 102902AE, Dec. 2008 Revision, Copyright 2008, 2007, 2006, 19 pages. |
Corning Cable Systems, “OptiTect® Gen III Splitter Modules,” Standard Recommended Procedure (SRP) 000-258, Issue 1, 6 pages (Nov. 2007). |
Corning Cable Systems, “OptiTect® Gen III Splitter Modules,” Standard Recommended Procedure (SRP) 000-245, Issue 7, 4 pages (Mar. 2009). |
Corning Cable Systems, “Outdoor Multidwelling Unit (MDU) with Splitter Modules,” Standard Recommended Procedure (SRP) 003-764, Issue 1, 16 pages (Nov. 2007). |
Corning Cable Systems, “OptiTect® FDH-HDF Cabinet,” Standard Recommended Procedure (SRP) 003-668, Issue 11, 20 pages (Mar. 2004). |
Corning Cable Systems, “OptiTect® Premiere Cabinet FDH-HDF,” Standard Recommended Procedure (SRP) 003-668, Issue 5, 26 pages (Mar. 2005). |
Patent Cooperation Treaty, International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2008/000095, Sep. 12, 2008, 2 pages. |
Gibson et al., Evanescent Field Analysis of Air-Silica Microstructure Waveguides, IEEE, 0-7803-7105-Apr. 1, 2001, pp. 709-710. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11653137 | Jan 2007 | US |
Child | 12012144 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12012144 | Jan 2008 | US |
Child | 13162115 | US |