The present invention relates to fiber optic probes for use in making on-wafer measurements of the parameters of photodetectors and other optoelectronic devices.
An existing fiber optic probe for use in making measurements is shown in Modolo et al., “Wafer Level High-Frequency Measurements of Photodetector Characteristics,” Applied Optics, volume 27, pages 3059-3061 (1988). In the Modolo et al. probe, an optical fiber is pressure fitted into the grooved periphery of a disc segment mounted on a probe arm so that the fiber extends longitudinally through a bend of 90 degrees around the disc segment and thence to a pulsed optical signal source. To probe a given device, the probing end of the optical fiber is advanced longitudinally toward the surface of the test device until it is approximately 100 micrometers from the surface of the device.
One of the limitations of the Modolo et al. probe is that the optical fiber is pressure fitted into the peripheral groove of the disc segment and therefore cannot move longitudinally relative to the disc segment. Thus, as the probing end of the optical fiber is moved longitudinally toward the surface of the test device, any slight over travel of movement will cause the end of the fiber to impact against the surface causing possible damage either to the surface of the test device or to the end of the fiber, or both.
Rumbaugh, U.S. Pat. No. 5,101,453, discloses a fiber optic wafer probe that includes a probe body along which an optical fiber extends to protrude from the tip of the probe body. The probe body loosely guides the optical fiber so that at least a significant portion of the length of the optical fiber is movable longitudinally with respect to the tip and probe body. The purpose of the movability of the optical fiber is to enable the optical fiber to buckle longitudinally in response to longitudinal over-travel of the fiber toward the test device. After repeated use, the optical fiber is replaced by a new optical fiber and connector. Unfortunately, replacement of the optical fiber insert is both expensive and time consuming. Further, the angle of incidence provided by the optical probe may be unsuitable for a particular probe station or probing requirements. Moreover, the bulky nature of the optical probe make it unsuitable for environments with limited available space.
Clyne, U.S. Pat. No. 6,071,009, discloses a tubular arrangement with a fiber optic lead contained therein specifically designed for measuring the surface temperature of wire-bonded semiconductors and the like. A temperature sensor is attached to the end of the fiber optic lead to facilitate temperature measurements. However, the design disclosed by Clyne is specifically designed for surface temperature measurements and is generally ineffective for optical probing of semiconductor wafers.
The present inventors considered existing fiber optic probe wafer probes and determined that their design limits the existing probe's ability to accurately test a semiconductor wafer. Referring to
The cavity defined within the probe body 10 along a substantial or major portion of its length is preferably closely surrounding the optical fiber 14 maintained therein. With the optical fiber 14 maintained in such a close relationship to the cavity, a major portion of (or substantially all of) the optical fiber 14 is effectively restrained from free lateral movement along the length of the probe body 10 during testing (or otherwise), in the event of contact with the optical probe and the device under test. Further, by resisting free movement of the optical fiber during testing the end of the optical fiber may be maintained in at a more predetermined location to optimize optical coupling and increases the placement accuracy of the end of the optical fiber during testing.
After further consideration of the internal profile of the probe body 10 the present inventors determined that a tapered profile toward the probe tip 12 permits the optical fiber to be more easily inserted within the probe body 10. While the region proximate the probe tip 12 may provide the primary resistance to free lateral movement of the optic fiber, a major portion of the remaining portion of the probe body 10 maintains the optical fiber relatively stationary, which may improve measurements made with the fibre optic probe. Preferably, the cross sectional area near the tip is less than the cross sectional area near the middle, which is likewise less than the cross sectional area near the end proximate the support 15.
In order to achieve improved usability for the fibre optic probe to be used in a multitude of different environments, the probe body 10 is preferably readily bendable to adjust the angle of the probe tip with respect to the probe body. In this manner, the angle of incidence of the optical fibre may be selected and otherwise adjusted to achieve increased performance.
To bend the probe body 10, preferably with the optical fibre contained therein, a bending tool may be used, as shown in
The preferred material from which the exterior of the probe body 10 is constructed of is a flexible metallic or conductive material. After consideration of the properties of a metallic material the present inventors determined that the metallic material has a tendency to “kink” or otherwise crimp the optical fiber contained therein when bent. In order to reduce the likelihood of damaging the optical fibre, while maintaining the relatively close relationship between the tubular cavity and the optical fiber, the present inventors determined that an internal capillary material constructed from any suitable material may be used. Within the probe body the capillary material preferably closely surrounds the optical fiber, as previously described. The capillary material preferably extends from the probe tip through a significant or major portion of the probe body 10, such as past the anticipated bent portion 56. The capillary material is selected from any suitable material such that it has a lesser tendency to crimp or otherwise deform than the external material, such as metal. Preferably, the range of bending is up to 90°, but may be from 10°-60°, if desired. It is to be understood that the optical fibre does not necessarily need to be maintained within an elongate cavity. It is sufficient, that the optical fibre extends longitudinally along a portion of the probe body.
The optical fiber 14 may be connected to a conventional optical fiber connector at one end, such as that disclosed by Rumbaugh, U.S. Pat. No. 5,101,453. Unfortunately, the connection of the combination of an optical fiber 14 and the connector results in significant expense over the life of the product to periodically replace the optical fibre. In addition, after initially adjusting the length of the optical fibre, it is difficult to trim the end of the optical fiber again to remove a damaged portion at the end thereof. Moreover, the connector maintains the optical fiber in a fixed rotational position which may result in twisting the optical fiber during use thus increasing the likelihood of breaking the optical fiber. To overcome these limitations, the present inventors have determined that extending the optical fibre through a support 15 to a light signal source 60 is preferable. The support 15 preferably rotatably secures the optical fiber 14 to maintain the terminal portion of the optical fiber at the proper position. The support 15 may include a collet 29 (see
The collet 29 or other fiber securement structure may also be rotatable within the support 14, or otherwise replace the support 14, to permit a controlled rotation of the optical fiber 14 about its longitudinal axis. This theta adjustment permits rotational adjustment of the end of the optical fiber 14 with respect to the wafer without releasing the securement structure which may result in improved testing, especially if the end of the optical fiber 14 is cut at a non-perpendicular orientation with respect to the length of the fiber. In the preferred embodiment, gear teeth around the perimeter of the collet 29 mesh with a helical thread on an adjustment knob.
Referring to
The terms and expressions which have been employed in the foregoing specification are used therein as terms of description and not of limitation, and there is no intention, in the use of such terms and expressions, of excluding equivalents of the features shown and described or portions thereof, it being recognized that the scope of the invention is defined and limited only by the claims which follow.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/849,152, filed May 4, 2001 now U.S. Pat. No. 6,970,634.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3740900 | Youmans et al. | Jun 1973 | A |
3952156 | Lahr | Apr 1976 | A |
4383217 | Shiell | May 1983 | A |
4401945 | Juengel | Aug 1983 | A |
4515439 | Esswein | May 1985 | A |
4641659 | Sepponen | Feb 1987 | A |
4652082 | Warner | Mar 1987 | A |
4696544 | Costella | Sep 1987 | A |
4705447 | Smith | Nov 1987 | A |
4727637 | Buckwitz et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4746857 | Sakai et al. | May 1988 | A |
4788851 | Brault | Dec 1988 | A |
4805627 | Klingenbeck et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4818059 | Kakii et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4864227 | Sato | Sep 1989 | A |
4891584 | Kamieniecki et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4922186 | Tsuchiya et al. | May 1990 | A |
4970386 | Buck | Nov 1990 | A |
4972073 | Lessing | Nov 1990 | A |
5001423 | Abrami et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5097207 | Blanz | Mar 1992 | A |
5101453 | Rumbaugh | Mar 1992 | A |
5159264 | Anderson | Oct 1992 | A |
5159267 | Anderson | Oct 1992 | A |
5202558 | Barker | Apr 1993 | A |
5232789 | Platz et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5233197 | Bowman et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5267088 | Nomura | Nov 1993 | A |
5270664 | McMurtry et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5298972 | Heffner | Mar 1994 | A |
5315237 | Iwakura et al. | May 1994 | A |
5317656 | Moslehi et al. | May 1994 | A |
5321453 | Mori et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5404111 | Mori et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5408189 | Swart et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5412330 | Ravel et al. | May 1995 | A |
5430813 | Anderson et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5481196 | Nosov | Jan 1996 | A |
5505150 | James et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5621400 | Corbi | Apr 1997 | A |
5633780 | Cronin | May 1997 | A |
5642298 | Mallory et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5644248 | Fujimoto | Jul 1997 | A |
5656942 | Watts et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5666063 | Abercrombie et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5704355 | Bridges | Jan 1998 | A |
5715819 | Svenson et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5728091 | Payne et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5731920 | Katsuragawa | Mar 1998 | A |
5767690 | Fujimoto | Jun 1998 | A |
5803607 | Jones et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5804982 | Lo et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5829437 | Bridges | Nov 1998 | A |
5831442 | Heigl | Nov 1998 | A |
5841288 | Meaney et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5852232 | Samsavar et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5879289 | Payne et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5900737 | Graham et al. | May 1999 | A |
5944093 | Viswanath | Aug 1999 | A |
5945836 | Sayre et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6006002 | Motoki et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6031383 | Streib et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6032714 | Fenton | Mar 2000 | A |
6034533 | Terro et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6061589 | Bridges et al. | May 2000 | A |
6064213 | Khandros et al. | May 2000 | A |
6064217 | Smith | May 2000 | A |
6071009 | Clyne | Jun 2000 | A |
6096567 | Kaplan et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6127831 | Khoury et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6172337 | Johnsgard et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6181416 | Falk | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6191596 | Abiko | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6211663 | Moulthrop et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6215295 | Smith, III | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6222031 | Wakabayashi et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6222970 | Wach et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6257564 | Avneri et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6271673 | Furuta et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6275738 | Kasevich et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6278051 | Peabody | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6320372 | Keller | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6340895 | Uher et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6396296 | Tarter et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6415858 | Getchel et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6448788 | Meaney et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6481939 | Gillespie et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6490471 | Svenson et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6528993 | Shin et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6572608 | Lee et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6611417 | Chen | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6628503 | Sogard | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6798226 | Altmann et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
20020008533 | Ito et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020009377 | Shafer | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020009378 | Obara | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020011859 | Smith et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020011863 | Takahashi et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020070745 | Johnson et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020153909 | Petersen | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020180466 | Hiramatsu et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030030822 | Finarov | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030088180 | Van Veen | May 2003 | A1 |
20030139662 | Seidman | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030139790 | Ingle | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030184332 | Tomimatsu et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040021475 | Ito et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040100297 | Tanioka et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040113640 | Cooper | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040134899 | Hiramatsu et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040207072 | Hiramatsu et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3637549 | May 1988 | DE |
195 42 955 | Nov 1995 | DE |
197 49 687 | Nov 1997 | DE |
20220754 | May 2004 | DE |
0846476 | Jun 1998 | EP |
55-115383 | Sep 1980 | JP |
56-88333 | Jul 1981 | JP |
57-75480 | May 1982 | JP |
57-163035 | Oct 1982 | JP |
62-98634 | May 1987 | JP |
62-107937 | May 1987 | JP |
3-196206 | Aug 1991 | JP |
3-228348 | Oct 1991 | JP |
4-130639 | May 1992 | JP |
4-159043 | Jun 1992 | JP |
4-206930 | Jul 1992 | JP |
5-82631 | Apr 1993 | JP |
61-54238 | Jun 1994 | JP |
6154238 | Jun 1994 | JP |
8-330401 | Dec 1996 | JP |
09127432 | May 1997 | JP |
11-023975 | Jan 1999 | JP |
2002-243502 | Aug 2002 | JP |
WO PCTEP9302774 | Oct 1993 | WO |
WO 9410554 | May 1994 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060008226 A1 | Jan 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09849152 | May 2001 | US |
Child | 11221676 | US |