1. Field of the Invention
The present disclosure relates to bioresorbable composites and more specifically to a fiber reinforced polymer composite material that is used to make bioresorbable products.
2. Related Art
Metal products have been used in fracture fixation due to their high strength. While these products perform well, there are a significant number of occurrences where these products can cause problems to the patient. In some cases the presence of the metal implant can cause irritation of the soft tissue around the implant, in severe cases this necessitates the removal of the implant. The procedure to remove the metal products exposes the patient to the risks associated with undergoing a major medical procedure and also adds to the overall cost of healing the original fracture. One potential solution to substantially reduce the need to remove fracture fixation hardware is to use bioresorbable devices to fix the fracture. However, the currently available bioresorbable materials and products do not have the required combination of initial strength and retention of this strength for suitable fracture healing to occur.
The currently marketed bioresorbable products include those products manufactured from injection molded polymers, polymer blends, and co-polymers. These products have been utilized in the areas of craniomaxilofacial implants and non-load bearing fracture fixation implants, such as pins and screws, for wrist and ankle applications and for reattaching soft tissues, such as ligaments and tendons, to bone. In addition, there are also some spinal products available that make use of the compressive properties of these polymers. Products including these materials are easy to process, but are limited by the mechanical properties of the materials. These materials have a tensile strength in the range of between about 50 MPa to about 100 MPa. Depending on the choice of polymer or co-polymer, products in this category retain the majority of their strength for less than about 12 weeks. Therefore, these materials are not suitable for fracture fixation applications beyond simple non-loaded pins and screws.
Other currently marketed bioresorbable products include self reinforced products that have improved strength due to orientation of the polymer during processing of the product. Even though these products have improved strength, their flexural strength is still only around 250 MPa. This limits the uses of this technology for fracture fixation to screws and pins.
Recently, devices have been manufactured from fiber reinforced polymer composites utilizing polyglycolic acid (PGA) fibers. These composites have a good initial strength, but suffer a rapid loss in strength due to the rapid hydrolysis of these fibers. Devices have been manufactured using PLLA fibers and PDLLA as the matrix material. Unfortunately, this matrix breaks down rapidly and results in the composites having a rapid loss in strength. Other attempts have used co-polymers containing PLLA as the reinforcing fiber, such as PLLA-co-PGA copolymers at a ratio of 82:18. However, there has been difficulty in finding a suitable polymer matrix material that can be processed into a composite without degrading or breaking this reinforcing fiber. Most recently, composites have been made where the matrix was a polymer with the same chemical composition as the fiber or where the matrix was a blend with the majority of the blend being a polymer with the same chemical composition as the matrix. These composites have an initial flexural strength of between 120 to 140 MPa, with most of this strength lost within about 12 weeks of use.
Attempts to slow down the degradation of the polymer matrix have included modifying the composition to increase the hydrophobicity of the polymer. However, this increases either the crystallinity of the polymer matrix, which is undesirable from a biological perspective, or it makes the polymer too ductile if a hydrophobic rubbery component, such as polycaprolactone (PCL), is added. Buffering materials, such as calcium carbonate, have also been added to polymers to slow degradation rates and improve the biological properties, such as osteoconductivity. However, in order to gain the beneficial effects of calcium carbonate it needs to be present at high levels, about 30% by weight of the composition. Since a fiber polymer composite contains at least 50% of fiber by volume, it would be anticipated that a calcium carbonate-containing matrix would interfere adversely with the interface between the polymer matrix and reinforcing fibers. This could result in the fiber-reinforced composite substantially weakening or even falling apart before complete healing of a fracture.
In order to make a suitable fiber-reinforced composite material, the fiber and matrix material have certain requirements. The fiber needs to have both a high initial tensile strength, and the ability to retain the majority of this strength, for the fracture to heal. To have a high initial strength, the fibers need to be highly orientated and be present at about 40% by volume of the composite. In addition, the fibers should also have some crystallinity, as this imparts stability against relaxation of the orientation in the fiber.
The matrix material also needs to be able to retain the majority of its strength for a suitable time, approximately between about 6 to about 12 weeks, for the fracture to heal. In order to accomplish this, the matrix should have a sufficiently high initial molecular weight. As the polymers degrade, the molecular weight decreases and the polymers become brittle and lose their mechanical properties. Additives, such as calcium carbonate or other buffering materials, can be added to the matrix to control the degradation rate. The amount of the buffering material should be around 30% by weight of the matrix without adversely interfering with the interface between the polymer matrix and the reinforcing fibers.
In addition, the matrix material needs to be processable at a temperature which is low enough to not significantly affect the strength of the fiber and adhere well enough to the fiber to allow stress transfer from the matrix to the fiber. To accomplish this, both semi-crystalline and amorphous co-polymers can be used. Semi-crystalline co-polymers are typically composed of lactic acid and one or more additional monomer units whose function is to lower the melting point of the co-polymer matrix to a point where the strength of the fiber is not affected during the consolidation step. Amorphous or non-crystalline materials, such as poly (D-lactide) acid polymers, are suitable for processing with the fiber, as they soften at relatively low temperatures. However, these materials do not have a long strength retention time. This strength retention can be improved by incorporating a buffering material, such as calcium carbonate, into the matrix material. In this case, the calcium carbonate acts as both a buffer and also reduces the thermal sensitivity of the polymer to breakdown during processing. Taken together, the affect of the calcium carbonate is to both slow the rate of degradation of the polymer and help preserve the molecular weight during processing, without adversely interfering with the interface between the polymer matrix and the reinforcing fibers.
The present disclosure incorporates these requirements to produce a bioresorbable material which has a high initial strength and retains a significant proportion of this strength for a useful time.
In one aspect, the present disclosure relates to a fiber reinforced composite material including a PLLA fiber material, such as a continuous PLLA fiber material, and a matrix material that does not have the same chemical element composition as the fiber material. In an embodiment, the composite further includes a degradation controlling agent dispersed in the matrix material. In another embodiment, the degradation controlling agent includes a buffer material selected from a group including calcium carbonate, calcium hydrogen carbonates, calcium phosphates, tricalcium phosphates, dicalcium phosphates, magnesium carbonate, and sodium carbonate. In yet another embodiment, the degradation controlling agent includes a common salt. In an embodiment, the degradation controlling agent is selected from a group including a buffer material, a common salt, and combinations thereof. In a further embodiment, the degradation controlling agent is between about 0.1% to about 40% by weight of the matrix material. In yet a further embodiment, the composite further includes an accelerant dispersed in the fiber or matrix material. In a further embodiment, the PLLA fiber material is about 50% by volume of the composite. In an embodiment, the fiber material, which is bioabsorbable, has a tensile strength of between about 500 MPa to about 2000 MPa and a molecular weight of between about 290,000 g/mol and about 516,000 g/mol.
In an embodiment, the matrix material is bioresorbable and is selected from a group including a polymer, a copolymer, and a polymer blend. In another embodiment, when a polymer blend is used as the matrix, the blend includes at least two polymers and at least one of the polymers has a chemical element composition that is different to that of the fiber. In yet another embodiment, the polymer having a chemical element composition that is different to that of the fiber comprises at least 50% of the polymer blend. In a further embodiment, the polymer having a chemical element composition that is different to that of the fiber comprises more than 50% of the polymer blend. In yet a further embodiment, the matrix material is bioabsorbable.
In yet a further embodiment, the composite has an initial tensile strength of at least 250 MPa and retains at least 75% of the initial tensile strength for at least 8 weeks. In an embodiment, the composite material includes a flexural strength of about 200 MPa and a shear strength of at least 140 MPa.
In another aspect, the present disclosure includes a fiber reinforced composite material having a matrix material, a glass fiber material, and a degradation controlling agent. In an embodiment, the matrix material is selected from a group including a polymer, a copolymer, and a polymer blend. In an embodiment, the matrix material is bioabsorbable. In another embodiment, the glass fiber material is bioabsorbable. In yet another embodiment, the glass fiber material includes a tensile strength between about 300 MPa and about 1200 MPa. In a further embodiment, the glass fiber material includes a hydrophobic material. In yet a further embodiment, the glass fiber material is about 50% by volume of the composite.
In an embodiment, the degradation controlling agent is dispersed in the matrix material. In another embodiment, the degradation controlling agent is coated on a surface of the fiber material. In yet another embodiment, the degradation controlling agent is between about 0.1% to about 40% by weight of the matrix material. In a further embodiment, the degradation controlling agent includes a buffer material selected from a group including calcium carbonate, calcium hydrogen carbonates, calcium phosphates, tricalcium phosphates, dicalcium phosphates, magnesium carbonate, and sodium carbonate. In yet a further embodiment, the degradation controlling agent includes a common salt. In an embodiment, the degradation controlling agent is selected from a group including a buffer material, a common salt, and combinations thereof.
In yet a further embodiment, the composite has an initial tensile strength of at least 250 MPa and retains the initial tensile strength for at least 8 weeks. In an embodiment, the composite includes an initial flexural strength of between about 250 MPa and about 400 MPa. In another embodiment, the composite includes an initial flexural modulus of between about 20-30 GPa. In yet another embodiment, the composite retains about 98% of an initial mass for at least 2 weeks.
In yet another aspect, the present disclosure includes a fiber reinforced composite material having a matrix material, a fiber material, and a degradation controlling agent.
In a further aspect, the present disclosure includes a fiber reinforced composite material having a matrix material and a glass fiber material, wherein the glass fiber material includes a tensile strength of between about 300 MPa and about 1200 MPa.
In yet a further aspect, the present disclosure includes a fiber reinforced composite material having a PLLA fiber material and a matrix material, wherein the fiber material includes a molecular weight of between about 290,000 g/mol and about 516,000 g/mol.
Further areas of applicability of the present disclosure will become apparent from the detailed description provided hereinafter. It should be understood that the detailed description and specific examples, while indicating the preferred embodiments of the disclosure, are intended for purposes of illustration only and are not intended to limit the scope of the disclosure.
The following description of the preferred embodiment(s) is merely exemplary in nature and is in no way intended to limit the disclosure, its application, or uses.
In one aspect, the present disclosure relates to a fiber-reinforced composite material having a PLLA fiber material and a matrix material that does not have the same chemical element composition as the fiber material.
A continuous PLLA fiber is extruded and drawn to provide the fiber with a tensile strength of between about 500 MPa to about 2000 MPa and a molecular weight of between about 290,000 g/mol to about 516,000 g/mol. The extrusion and drawing process used to make the fiber may be any extrusion and drawing process known to one of ordinary skill in the art. The PLLA fiber material is about 50% by volume of the composite and is bioabsorbable.
The matrix material, which is bioabsorbable and selected from a group that includes a polymer, a copolymer, and a polymer blend, is then made. For the purposes of this disclosure, a matrix material that does not have the same chemical element composition as the fiber material is defined as the following: If the matrix material is a polymer, then the polymer may not be a pure polylactide material. If the matrix material is a copolymer, then at least one of the monomeric species is not a lactone monomer. If the matrix material is a polymer blend, then at least one of the polymers has a chemical element composition that is different to that of the fiber. The polymer that has a chemical element composition different to that of the fiber comprises at least 50% or more of the polymer blend. Alternatively, a matrix material that has the same chemical element composition as the fiber material, which is also within the scope of this disclosure, is defined as the following: If the matrix material is a polymer, then the polymer is a pure polylactide material. If the matrix material is a copolymer, then both monomeric species are lactone monomers. If the matrix material is a polymer blend, then both polymers are pure polylactide materials.
The composite may further include a degradation controlling agent. For the purposes of this disclosure, the degradation controlling agent may include a buffer material, a common salt, and combinations thereof. The buffer material is selected from a group including, but not limited to, calcium carbonate, calcium hydrogen carbonates, calcium phosphates, tricalcium phosphates, dicalcium phosphates, magnesium carbonate, and sodium carbonate. The common salt is water soluble and may be organic or inorganic. In addition, the salt may be based on, without limitation, one of the following: a Group I metal, including but not limited to, lithium, sodium, and potassium; a Group II metal, including but not limited to, beryllium, magnesium, calcium, strontium, and barium; transition metals, including but not limited to, copper, zinc, silver, gold, iron, and titanium; a Group III metal, including but not limited to, aluminum and boron. Furthermore, the salt may include, without limitation, a carbonate, a hydrogen carbonate, a phosphate, a hydrogen phosphate, silicates, polyphosphates, and polysilicates. Finally, the salt may be a single element, a compound, or a mixture thereof.
The degradation controlling agent is dispersed in the matrix material and is used as a buffer agent and to slow the degradation of the composite. The degradation controlling agent is between about 0.1% to about 40% by weight of the matrix material. The composite may further include an accelerant, such as the tertiary butyl ester of lauric acid or the ditertiary butyl ester of fumaric acid, dispersed in the matrix material or fiber material. Other accelerants known to those of ordinary skill in the art may be used. Use of these accelerants accelerates the degradation rate of the fiber or matrix.
The composite material has an initial tensile strength of at least 250 MPa and retains at least 75% of this initial tensile strength for at least 8 weeks. For the purposes of this disclosure, an initial tensile strength is taken to mean the tensile strength of the composite material prior to degradation. In addition, the composite has a flexural strength of about 200 MPa and a shear strength of at least 140 MPa.
In another aspect, the present disclosure relates to a fiber-reinforced composite material including a matrix material, a glass fiber material, and a degradation controlling agent.
The matrix material may be any biodegradable polymer, polymer blend, copolymer, or other biodegradable material known to those skilled in the art. Examples of biodegradable polymers include alpha-polyhydroxy acids, polyglycolide (PGA), poly(L-lactide), poly(D,L-lactide), poly(.epsilon.-caprolactone), poly(trimethylene carbonate), poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO), poly(.beta.hydroxybutyrate) (PHB), poly(.beta.-hydroxyvalerate) (PHVA), poly(p-dioxanone) (PDS), poly(ortho esters), tyrosine-derived polycarbonates, polypeptides, polyurethane, and combinations thereof.
The glass fiber material is bioabsorbable and represents about 50% by volume of the composite. The glass fiber material may be extruded and drawn by any extrusion and drawing process known to one of ordinary skill in the art. The fiber includes a tensile strength of between about 300 MPa and about 1200 MPa. In addition, the fiber material may include a hydrophobic material to slow down the degradation of the glass fiber material. The hydrophobic material may be a component of the composition of the glass fiber material or coated on a surface of the glass fiber material. Examples of hydrophobic materials include, without limitation, polycaprolactone, poly-para-xylylene (e.g. Parylene), isomers and co-polymers of polylactide, polypeptide, ceramic materials (i.e. hydroxyapatite and any form of calcium phosphate), and any other organic or inorganic hydrophobic material likely to slow down the penetration of water to the fiber. For the purposes of this disclosure, the glass fibers include about 50 mol % potassium oxide (P2O5), about 30 mol % calcium oxide (CaO), about 15 mol % sodium oxide (Na2O), and 5 mol % iron oxide (Fe2O3). However, glass fibers of different compositions may be used.
The degradation controlling agent may be of the same type as the degradation controlling agents described above and may be dispersed in the matrix material or coated on a surface of the fiber material. The agent acts as a means to control the degradation of the composite and/or the glass fiber. Specifically, with regards to the glass fibers, it is believed that the common salt substantially reduces the release of ions from the fibers. Where the degradation controlling agent is dispersed in the matrix material, the agent represents between about 0.1% to about 40% by weight of the matrix material.
The composite has an initial tensile strength of at least 250 MPa and is able to retain this initial tensile strength for at least 8 weeks. In addition, the composite includes an initial flexural strength of between about 250 MPa and about 400 MPa. Furthermore, the composite retains about 98% of an initial mass for at least 2 weeks when it is placed in in-vivo conditions.
The reinforcing fibers of both composites, as described above, preferably have mechanical properties that are not substantially compromised when tested in a physiological (aqueous, 37° C.) environment. The fibers are preferably insoluble in the solvent used to dissolve the matrix polymer. In addition, the degradation controlling agent of both composites must be one that reacts with the acid by-products that are generated during the degradation of the polymer fiber or matrix or the glass fiber, including, without limitation, lactic acid, glycolic acid, caproic acid, and different forms of phosphoric acid. Where the degradation controlling agent is in a particulate form, the particles may have a number of sizes, ranging from about 1 mm to about 10 nm, and geometries, such as needle, cubic, platelet, fibers, spheres, and other geometries known to one of ordinary skill in the art. It is important, but not required, that the particles have a shape that enhances the mechanical properties of the particles.
Biological agents, such as cells, growth factors, antibiotics, anti-microbials, or other such factors may be added to one or more components of the composites to promote healing of the fracture.
Further details may be derived from the examples below.
PLLA fiber was first made by taking PLLA granules with a nominal intrinsic viscosity of 3.8 and extruding the granules into a fiber. A single screw extruder fitted with a gear pump and a 2 mm spinneret die was used. The extruder also had a provision for air cooling. The extruded fiber was batched on spools for the next processing step. Subsequently, the fiber was progressively stretched at elevated temperatures to produce a final diameter of ca. 100 microns and a draw ratio between about 8 and about 15. The final molecular weight of the drawn fiber was between about 290,000 g/mol−1 to about 516,000 gmol−1. The resultant fiber had an average tensile strength of greater than about 800 MPa.
Composites were then made using an 85:15 co-polymer of PDLLA and PGA with a 35% weight addition of calcium carbonate (CaCO3) as the matrix material. The drawn poly (L-lactide) fibers were then wound around a support frame of parallel bars that were held a constant distance apart. For each sample the fiber was wrapped 75 times around the support frame, resulting in 150 fibers in each composite. The matrix was dissolved in a solvent, methyl acetate, at 10% wt/vol of solvent. The solvent/polymer mixture was then coated onto the fibers. The composite was then placed in a vacuum oven at 40° C. for 12 hours to remove the solvent.
The composite was then placed in a cylindrical mold and heated to 165° C. This temperature is used to melt the matrix material to allow it to flow and consolidate the composite. Once thermal equilibrium was reached, slight tension was applied to the fibers to align them in the mold. The mold was then closed completely to consolidate the fibers and the matrix. The closed mold was then maintained at 165° C. for up to 5 minutes and then removed from the heated press and placed between cool metal blocks to cool the composite down to room temperature to allow tension to be released from the fibers.
Samples of the composite were aged in phosphate buffer solution (PBS) at 37° C. The average diameter of the samples was about 1.7 mm. The composites were removed from the aging solution, dried, and tested using a 3-point bend test method. As shown in Table 1, the samples were tested for their initial tensile strength and their tensile strengths after 6, 10, 12, and 16 weeks. Compared to the initial tensile strength, the tensile strength of the composite during the succeeding weeks remained high.
Composites were made using the method described in Example 1, with and without CaCO3 mixed in the matrix, and with a range of different matrix materials. The resultant composites were tested for their flexural strength in 3 point bending. The pins were 2 mm in diameter and tested using a 16:1 span to diameter ratio. The results are given in Table 2. It is clear that the mechanical properties of the composites containing a degradation controlling agent are not significantly compromised by the presence of the material.
Composites were made that included poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA) fibers and a co-polymer matrix of poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA) and polyglycolic acid (PGA) (PLGA 85:15) using the method described in example 1. The composite did not include calcium carbonate or other degradation controlling agents. The flexural and shear properties of the resultant pins were tested, via a 3-point bending test, after aging in PBS at 37° C. The results are given in Table 3.
40 g of poly(D,L-lactide-co-glycolide) were dissolved in 360 ml of CHCl3 to produce a clear solution and 61.54 g of calcium carbonate (CaCO3) filled poly(D,L-lactide-co-glycolide) were dissolved in 360 ml of CHCl3 to produce a suspension of CaCO3 particles in polymer solution. 1 m long skeins of glass fiber, having the properties shown in Table 4 and weighing between 4.56 g and 7.32 g, were then dipped in the solutions and suspended in a fume cupboard to allow the solvent to evaporate. The resulting coated fiber strips were vacuum dried at 80° C. below 1 mbar to constant mass. The weights and compositions of the dried skeins are shown in Table 5.
The coated fiber strips were cut into 120 mm lengths and compression molded at 160° C. to produce composite bars with nominal measurements of 10×3×120 mm. The bars were accurately measured and weighed to calculate their compositions. The flexural mechanical properties of the composites were tested using a 3 point bend test method. The length/distance ratio of the composites was 32 and the test speed was 4.74 mm/min. The moduli were determined from 3 measurements and the strength/strain to failure from 1 specimen. The compositions and mechanical properties results are shown in Table 6. The table shows that the glass fiber composites have substantially similar flexural strengths to the polymer fiber composites in Table 2. For the purposes of this disclosure, the modulus is a quantity that expresses the degree to which a substance possesses a property, such as elasticity.
Solutions of 10% w/w of poly (D-L-lactide-co-glycolide) 85:15 and 35% w/w (of the polymer weight) CaCO3 in CH2Cl2 were prepared. Approx. 50 cm lengths of glass fiber (50 mol % P2O5, 30-40 mol % CaO, 5-15 mol % Na2O, 5 mol % Fe2O3) weighing between 1.5 and 7 g were weighed, dipped in the polymer solution, and hung up to dry in a fume cupboard over night. The fibers were then vacuum dried at 80° C. and re-weighed. The composite strips were cut into 12 mm lengths and randomized.
The composites were compression moulded in an aluminium mould with a cavity measuring 120×3×10 mm. The mould was lined with a strip of PTFE impregnated glass cloth to allow the product to be removed more easily. The moulding was done at 160° C. under 100 kN pressure. The mould was pre-heated and then strips were loaded into the cavity by hand one or two at a time. Once the mould was full, the pressure was applied for a few seconds, the mould was then re-opened, and further strips added. This was repeated until no further strips could be forced into the mould. The mould was then cooled to room temperature under pressure. The composite bars were trimmed and then capped with a layer of filled matrix to seal the ends. The weights and compositions of the fibers are shown in Table 7.
All samples were tested to assess flexural stiffness and tested to failure. Tests were performed in a 3 point bending test set-up, with a testing span of 90 mm and thickness and width measured for each sample. For modulus measurements, deflection was performed at a crosshead displacement of 4.74 mm/min using a 100N load cell. Strength was measured using a 10 kN load cell. The compositions and mechanical properties results are shown in Table 8.
Glass fiber composites, as prepared in Example 5, with and without CaCO3 filler mixed in the matrix, were immersed individually in bottles containing 300 ml of phosphate buffer saline (PBS) and placed in an incubator at 37° C. The samples were removed for analysis after 14 days, and their dry mass was recorded. The samples containing CaCO3 had retained 98% of their initial dry mass, while those without CaCO3 had only retained 63% of their initial dry mass
The polymer fiber composite material of the present disclosure includes a polylactic acid fiber of high strength and a matrix material that is suitable for working with this fiber. The matrix allows for a good interfacial strength between the fiber and the matrix, which provides the composite with a high mechanical strength and a decreased degradation rate. Also disclosed are polymer and glass fiber composite materials having a concentration of buffering material that has been shown to not adversely interfere with the interface between the polymer matrices and the fiber materials. Rather, the testing results show that the buffering material works to provide the composite with the ability to retain a majority of its initial strength over a longer period of time by slowing the rate of degradation of the polymer matrix and, in the glass fiber composite, the degradation rate of the glass fiber.
A composite material containing a matrix material and a mixture of the above-described glass and polymer fibers, with or without a degradation controlling agent, is also within the scope of this disclosure. The matrix and the glass and polymer fibers may be of the same type and made by the same processes as the above-described matrices and polymer/glass fibers. In addition, the degradation controlling agents may be of the same type as described above. Furthermore, the processing conditions for making the composite may be the same as the processing conditions for making the above-described polymer fiber composites.
As various modifications could be made to the exemplary embodiments, as described above with reference to the corresponding illustrations, without departing from the scope of the disclosure, it is intended that all matter contained in the foregoing description and shown in the accompanying drawings shall be interpreted as illustrative rather than limiting. Thus, the breadth and scope of the present disclosure should not be limited by any of the above-described exemplary embodiments, but should be defined only in accordance with the following claims appended hereto and their equivalents.
This application is the U.S. national phase of International Application No. PCT/US2007/086067 filed on Nov. 30, 2007 published in English on Jun. 5, 2008 as International Publication No. WO 2008/067531 A1, which application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/867,978 filed Nov. 30, 2006, the entire contents of both of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2007/086067 | 11/30/2007 | WO | 00 | 2/8/2010 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2008/067531 | 6/5/2008 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3531561 | Trehu | Sep 1970 | A |
3636956 | Schneider | Jan 1972 | A |
3736646 | Schmitt et al. | Jun 1973 | A |
3797499 | Schneider | Mar 1974 | A |
4137921 | Okuzumi et al. | Feb 1979 | A |
4181983 | Kulkarni | Jan 1980 | A |
4356228 | Kobayashi et al. | Oct 1982 | A |
4438253 | Casey et al. | Mar 1984 | A |
4523591 | Kaplan et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4539981 | Tung | Sep 1985 | A |
4559945 | Koelmel et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4636215 | Schwartz | Jan 1987 | A |
4700704 | Jamiolkowski et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4756307 | Crowninshield | Jul 1988 | A |
4916207 | Boyle, Jr. et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4938763 | Dunn et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4950258 | Kawai et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4968317 | Tormala et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4990161 | Kampner | Feb 1991 | A |
5010145 | Ikada et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5049591 | Hayashi et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5053035 | McLaren | Oct 1991 | A |
5108755 | Daniels et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5110852 | Gogolewski et al. | May 1992 | A |
5192301 | Kamiya et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5201771 | Belykh et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5250584 | Ikada et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5266608 | Katz et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5275601 | Gogolewski et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5294395 | Broyer | Mar 1994 | A |
5333624 | Tovey | Aug 1994 | A |
5360448 | Thramann | Nov 1994 | A |
5364400 | Rego, Jr. et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5376120 | Sarver et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5383931 | Hehli et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5407445 | Tautvydas et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5417712 | Whittaker et al. | May 1995 | A |
5437918 | Taniguchi et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5441515 | Khosravi et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5458653 | Davidson | Oct 1995 | A |
5470334 | Ross et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5525706 | Gruber et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5527337 | Stack et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5527341 | Gogolewski et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5562704 | Tamminmaki et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5569250 | Sarver et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5571193 | Kampner | Nov 1996 | A |
5571204 | Nies | Nov 1996 | A |
5633002 | Stricker et al. | May 1997 | A |
5634936 | Linden et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5641502 | Skalla et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5660846 | Cheikh | Aug 1997 | A |
5665831 | Neuenschwander et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5670161 | Healy et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5676699 | Gogolewski et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5690671 | McGurk et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5695497 | Stahelin | Dec 1997 | A |
5700901 | Hurst et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5716410 | Wang et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5716413 | Walter et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5733330 | Cox | Mar 1998 | A |
5741329 | Agrawal et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5760118 | Sinclair et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5766239 | Cox | Jun 1998 | A |
5766618 | Laurencin et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5792400 | Talja et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5817328 | Gresser et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5834582 | Sinclair et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5837276 | Cheikh | Nov 1998 | A |
5853639 | Kawakami et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5863297 | Walter et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5868746 | Sarver et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5893850 | Cachia | Apr 1999 | A |
5902599 | Anseth et al. | May 1999 | A |
5904658 | Niederauer et al. | May 1999 | A |
5908918 | Chen et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5935172 | Ochoa et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5939453 | Heller et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5947893 | Agrawal et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5968092 | Buscemi et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5977204 | Boyan et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5980564 | Stinson | Nov 1999 | A |
5997580 | Mastrorio et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
5997582 | Weiss | Dec 1999 | A |
6001100 | Sherman et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6001101 | Augagneur et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6005161 | Brekke et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6027742 | Lee et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6071982 | Wise et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6077989 | Kandel et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6113624 | Bezwada et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6136369 | Leitao et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6139963 | Fujii et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6150497 | Sastry et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6156842 | Hoenig et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6160084 | Langer et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6162225 | Gertzman et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6168570 | Ferrera | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6179842 | Spotorno et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6203573 | Walter et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6206883 | Tunc | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6248108 | Tormala et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6248430 | Toyoda et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6281262 | Shikinami | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6283973 | Hubbard et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6293950 | Lynch et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6299448 | Zdrahala et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6303697 | Yuan et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6315788 | Roby | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6344496 | Niederauer et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6375465 | Engman et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6388043 | Langer et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6425923 | Stalcup et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6436136 | Flodin et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6447515 | Meldrum | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6468277 | Justin et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6486296 | Shimamoto et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6503278 | Pohjonen et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6503991 | Shalaby | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6511511 | Slivka et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6511748 | Barrows | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6514286 | Leatherbury et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6547792 | Tsuji et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6565606 | Bruce et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6579533 | Tormala et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6599323 | Melican et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6605090 | Trieu et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6613089 | Estes et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6623487 | Goshert | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6652582 | Stinson | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6716957 | Tunc | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6719935 | Tunc | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6720402 | Langer et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6726696 | Houser et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6758862 | Berry et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6758863 | Estes et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6783712 | Slivka et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6827743 | Eisermann et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6830575 | Stenzel et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6841111 | Rickner et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6843799 | Bartlett | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6852825 | Lendlein et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6869445 | Johnson | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6881766 | Hain | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6902584 | Kwan et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6908466 | Bonutti et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6916321 | TenHuisen et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6974862 | Ringeisen et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7012106 | Yuan et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7033603 | Nelson et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7192443 | Solem et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7208550 | Mather et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7214765 | Ringeisen et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7261716 | Strobel et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7261734 | Gellman et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7268205 | Williams et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7270813 | Shimp et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7285087 | Moaddeb et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7285130 | Austin | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7314480 | Eidenschink et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7335375 | Li et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7378144 | DeMeo et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7455674 | Rose | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7524891 | Rose | Apr 2009 | B2 |
20010012940 | Tunc | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010018614 | Bianchi | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20020022588 | Wilkie et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020029041 | Hover et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020029043 | Ahrens et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020071822 | Uhrich | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020082362 | Broccini et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020120348 | Melican et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020138154 | Li et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020150775 | Ishikawa et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020160032 | Long et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030045941 | Lewallen | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030055198 | Langer et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030104031 | Dumont et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030114937 | Leatherbury et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030120280 | Roller et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030125745 | Tseng et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030130742 | Connelly et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030153971 | Chandrasekaran | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030153972 | Helmus | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030180344 | Wise et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030236573 | Evans et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040002770 | King et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040015187 | Lendlein et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040019386 | Ferree | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040028655 | Nelson et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040030342 | Trieu et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040052992 | Boone et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040054372 | Corden et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040078090 | Binette et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040106734 | Rose | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040109823 | Kaplan | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040110285 | Lendlein et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040115239 | Shastri et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040131681 | Ambrose et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040143221 | Shadduck | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040153075 | Roger | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040156878 | Rezania et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040172118 | Gibson | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040193154 | Leatherbury et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040241203 | Shakesheff et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040242722 | Rose et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040254639 | Li et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040258732 | Shikinami | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040259972 | Ringeisen et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040260398 | Kelman | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040265385 | West | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040267263 | May | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050008672 | Winterbottom et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050013793 | Beckman et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050019404 | Sung et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050033295 | Wisnewski | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050043751 | Phan et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050043752 | Phan et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050070928 | Heino et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050080483 | Solem et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050080489 | Estes et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050085313 | Nishitani | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050085812 | Sherman et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050090861 | Porter | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050107886 | Crabtree et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050123582 | Sung et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050125051 | Eidenschink et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050136764 | Sherman et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050137611 | Escudero et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050137715 | Phan et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050159812 | Dinger, III et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050165128 | Cohn et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050177144 | Phan et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050177245 | Leatherbury et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050182411 | DeMeo et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050182428 | Bearinger et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050187602 | Eidenschink | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050197422 | Mayadunne et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050208094 | Armitage et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050209705 | Niederauer et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050240281 | Slivka et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050273106 | Oepen | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060051394 | Moore et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060067973 | Schachter | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060121084 | Borden et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060121087 | Williams et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060136071 | Maspero et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060149248 | Schlienger et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060177480 | Sung et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060178748 | Dinger, III et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060188546 | Giroux | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060188547 | Bezwada | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060200150 | Ilomaki et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060247610 | Lanphere et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060263335 | France et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060264948 | Williams | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060293749 | Hudgins et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070005094 | Eaton et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070014831 | Sung et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070041950 | Leatherbury et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070043376 | Leatherbury et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070043433 | Chandrasekaran | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070048383 | Helmus | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070050018 | Wainwright | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070065652 | Liebschner | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070067043 | Dericks | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070100449 | O'Neil et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070128154 | Hadba et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070134305 | Zilberman | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070141111 | Suokas et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070156251 | Karmon | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070162019 | Burns et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070182041 | Rizk et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070191963 | Winterbottom et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070255422 | Wei et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070260324 | Joshi et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070265622 | Aeschlimann et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070270852 | Tormala et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070276366 | Gaines, Jr. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070280983 | Strickler et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070299151 | Guelcher et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070299156 | Brown | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070299449 | Allinniemi et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080015578 | Erickson et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080077140 | Osman | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080085297 | Dave et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080086199 | Dave et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080154368 | Justis et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080154373 | Protopsaltis et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080200638 | Redepenning | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080206297 | Roeder et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080234754 | McCarthy et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080234762 | Forstein et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080241211 | Han et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080249633 | Wu | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080262613 | Gogolewski | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080305144 | Brown et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090048145 | Hellerbrand et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090093888 | Dawson et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090099600 | Moore et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090149856 | Paakinaho et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090171064 | Arimura et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090204116 | Shalaby et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090258965 | Lassila et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090270923 | Tormala et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090274742 | Brown | Nov 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2254002 | May 2000 | CA |
1857742 | Nov 2006 | CN |
2817778 | Nov 1978 | DE |
2947985 | Sep 1981 | DE |
3936188 | May 1990 | DE |
4226465 | Feb 1993 | DE |
4220216 | Jan 1994 | DE |
0204931 | Dec 1986 | EP |
0299004 | Jan 1989 | EP |
0321389 | Jun 1989 | EP |
326426 | Aug 1989 | EP |
0401844 | Dec 1990 | EP |
0439892 | Aug 1991 | EP |
475077 | Mar 1992 | EP |
0590656 | Apr 1994 | EP |
0595956 | May 1994 | EP |
326426 | Dec 1994 | EP |
0635274 | Jan 1995 | EP |
0531487 | Jan 1996 | EP |
0711534 | May 1996 | EP |
747072 | Dec 1996 | EP |
0751165 | Jan 1997 | EP |
0803521 | Oct 1997 | EP |
0805175 | Nov 1997 | EP |
0806283 | Nov 1997 | EP |
1009448 | Jun 2000 | EP |
1056487 | Dec 2000 | EP |
1086711 | Mar 2001 | EP |
1136510 | Sep 2001 | EP |
1142597 | Oct 2001 | EP |
1093774 | Jun 2002 | EP |
1216717 | Jun 2002 | EP |
1277482 | Jan 2003 | EP |
0815809 | Mar 2004 | EP |
1284756 | Sep 2004 | EP |
2707477 | Jan 1995 | FR |
807589 | Jan 1959 | GB |
2215209 | Sep 1989 | GB |
2169612 | Jun 1990 | JP |
8196617 | Aug 1996 | JP |
9040761 | Feb 1997 | JP |
9095606 | Apr 1997 | JP |
9221539 | Aug 1997 | JP |
9234241 | Sep 1997 | JP |
9272790 | Oct 1997 | JP |
10176039 | Jun 1998 | JP |
10309313 | Nov 1998 | JP |
11209595 | Aug 1999 | JP |
3503045 | Mar 2004 | JP |
141988 | Mar 1998 | KR |
WO8404311 | Nov 1984 | WO |
WO9003768 | Apr 1990 | WO |
WO9301773 | Feb 1993 | WO |
WO9534331 | Dec 1995 | WO |
WO9705193 | Feb 1997 | WO |
WO9725936 | Jul 1997 | WO |
WO9736555 | Oct 1997 | WO |
WO9826814 | Jun 1998 | WO |
WO9830141 | Jul 1998 | WO |
WO9847445 | Oct 1998 | WO |
WO9911296 | Mar 1999 | WO |
WO9911297 | Mar 1999 | WO |
WO9922770 | May 1999 | WO |
WO0001426 | Jan 2000 | WO |
WO01046501 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO0196105 | Dec 2001 | WO |
WO0200137 | Jan 2002 | WO |
WO0234159 | May 2002 | WO |
WO0234310 | May 2002 | WO |
WO02076725 | Oct 2002 | WO |
WO03004071 | Jan 2003 | WO |
WO03064531 | Aug 2003 | WO |
WO2004011054 | Feb 2004 | WO |
WO2004071356 | Aug 2004 | WO |
WO2004110313 | Dec 2004 | WO |
WO2005014718 | Feb 2005 | WO |
WO2005028534 | Mar 2005 | WO |
WO2005046470 | May 2005 | WO |
WO2005085313 | Sep 2005 | WO |
WO2005112804 | Dec 2005 | WO |
WO2006053936 | May 2006 | WO |
WO2006064025 | Jun 2006 | WO |
WO2006108114 | Oct 2006 | WO |
WO2006114483 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO2006116129 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO2007010092 | Jan 2007 | WO |
WO2007020430 | Feb 2007 | WO |
WO2007021593 | Feb 2007 | WO |
WO2007023296 | Mar 2007 | WO |
WO2007024492 | Mar 2007 | WO |
WO2007065074 | Jun 2007 | WO |
WO2007084609 | Jul 2007 | WO |
WO2007086832 | Aug 2007 | WO |
WO2007111808 | Oct 2007 | WO |
WO2007117499 | Oct 2007 | WO |
WO2008001633 | Jan 2008 | WO |
WO2008116591 | Mar 2008 | WO |
WO2008044011 | Apr 2008 | WO |
WO2008089172 | Jul 2008 | WO |
WO2008098019 | Aug 2008 | WO |
WO2008101932 | Aug 2008 | WO |
WO2008112912 | Sep 2008 | WO |
WO2008131197 | Oct 2008 | WO |
WO2008134264 | Nov 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
First Office Action issued by the State Intellectual Property Office in related Chinese Patent Application No. 200780043841.9. |
Andriano, et al., ‘Processing and characterization of absorbable polylactide polymers for use in surgical implants,’ Journal of Applied Biomaterials, 5(2):133-140 (1994). |
Asano, et al., ‘In vivo characteristics of low molecular weight copoly(D,L-lactic acid) formulations with controlled release of LH-RH agonist,’ Biomaterials, 10(8):569-573 (1989). |
Barca, et al., ‘Resorbable poly-L-lactic acid mini-staples for the fixation of Akin osteotomies,’ The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, 36(2):106-111 (1997). |
Bertrand, et al., ‘Biocompatbility Aspects of New Stent Technology, JACC, 32(3):562-571 (1998). |
Celikkaya, et al., ‘Poly(DL-lactide)/Poly(ethylene glycol) Copolymer Particles. I. Preparation and Characterization,’ Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 61:1439-1446 (1996). |
Daniels, et al., ‘Mechanical properties of biodegradable polymers and composites proposed for internal fixation of bone,’ J. Applied Biomaterials, 1:57-78 (1990). |
Dauner, et al. ‘Resorbable continuous-fiber reinforced polymers for osteosynthesis,’ J. Materials Science Materials in Medicine, 9:173-179 (1998). |
Eling, et al., ‘Biodegradable Materials of Poly(L-Lactic Acid): 1. Melt-Spun and Solution-Spun Fibres,’ Polymer, 23:1587-1593 (1982). |
Fambri, et al., ‘Biodegradable fibres of poly(l-lactic acid) produced by melt spinning,’ Polymer, 38:79-85 (1997). |
Frenger, ‘Biomedical Uses of Shape Memory Polymers,’ Biomed. Sci. Instrum., 29:47-50 (1993). |
Fukuzaki, et al., ‘Synthesis of copoly(D,L-Lactic acid) with relatively low molecular weight and in vitro degradation, Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute, Gunma, Jpn, European Polymer Journal, 25(10):1019-1026 (1989). |
Giardino, et al., ‘Experimental evaluation of a resorbable intramedullary plug for cemented total hip replacement,’ Biomaterials, 18(13):907-913 (1997). |
Gautier, et al., ‘Poly(α-hydroxyacids) for application in the spinal cord: Resorbability and biocompatibility with adult rate Schwann cells and spinal cord,’ Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, 42(4):642-654 (1998). |
Gogolewsji, et al., ‘Resorbable materials of poly(L-lactide). II Fibers spun from solutions of poly(L-lactide) in good solvents,’ J. Appl. Polymer Sci., 28:1045-1061 (1983). |
Grijpma, et al., ‘Chain Entanglement, Mechanical Properties and Drawability of Poly(Lactide),’ Colloid. Polym. Sci., 272:1068-1081 (1994). |
Gupta, et al., ‘Poly(lactic acid) fiber: An overview’ Progress in Polymer Science, Pergamon Press, Oxford, GA, 34(4):455-482 (2007). |
Haers, et al., ‘Biodegradable polyactide plates and screws in orthognathic surgery,’ Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, 26(2):87-91 (1998). |
L. L. Hench, et al., ‘Bioactive materials: The potential for tissue regeneration,’ J. Biomed. Materials Research, 41(4):511-518 (1998). |
D. Hull and T. W. Clyne, ‘An introduction to composite materials,’ Second Edition, Cambridge University Press, Table of Contents, 8 pages. |
Hyon, et al., ‘Effects of residual monomer on the degradation of DL-lactide polymer,’ Hyon, Jamshidi & Ikada, Polymer International, 46:196-202 (1998). |
Kaitian, et al., ‘Poly(D,L-Lactic Acid) Homopolymers: Synthesis and Characterization,’ Turkish Journal of Chemistry, 20:43-53 (1996). |
Kister, et al., ‘Effects of morphology, conformation and configuration on the IR and Raman spectra of various poly(lactic acid)s,’ Polymer, 39(2): 267-273 (1998). |
Koelling, et al., ‘In vitro real-time aging and characterization of poly(L/D-lactic acid),’ Proceedings of the 1997 16th Southern Biomedical Engineering Conference (Cat. No. 97TH8270), pp. 197-201. |
Kontio, et al., ‘Fibrous wound repair associated with biodegradable poly-L/d-lactide copolymers implants: study of the expression of tenascin and cellular fibronectin,’ Journal of Materials Science-Materials in Medicine, 9:10:603-609 (1998). |
Kricheldorf, et al., ‘Polyactones: 32. High-molecular weight polylactides by ring-opening polymerization with dibutylmagnesium or butylmagnesium chloride,’ Polymer, 36(15):2995-3003 (1995). |
Losken, et al., ‘Memory of DL-polylactic acid biodegradable plates,’ Ann. Plast. Surg., 32(6):606-611 (1994). |
MacDonald, et al., ‘Enzymatic degradability of poly(lactide): Effects of chain stereochemistry and material crystallinity,’ Macromolecules, 29(23):7356-7361 (1996). |
Mainil-Varlet, et al., ‘Effect of in vivo and in vitro degradation on molecular and mechanical properties of various low-molecular weight polylactides,’ Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, 36(3):360-380 (1997). |
Matsumura, et al., ‘Novel ring opening polymerization of lactide by lipase,’ Macromol. Symp., 130:285-304 (1998). |
Morita, et al., ‘Intravitreous delivery of dexamethasone sodium m-sulfobenzoate from poly(DL-lactic acid) implants,’ Biological & Pharmaceutical Bulletin, 21(2):188-190 (1998). |
Okihara, et al., ‘Crystal structure of stereocomplex of poly(L-lactide) and poly(D-lactide), Journal of Macromolecular Science-Physics, B30(1-2):119-140 (1991). |
Okuzaki, et al., Mechanical Properties and Structure of the Zone-Drawn Poly(L-lactic acid) Fibers, Journal of Polymer Science, Part B, Polymer Physics, 37:991-996 (1999). |
Oriented Polymer Materials, Edited by Stoyko Fakirov, published by Huthig & Wepf Verlag Zug, Heidelberg, Oxford CT/USA, Table of Contents pp. v, viii, ix-xix (1996). |
Penning, et al., ‘Preparation and properties of absorbable fibres from L-lactide copolymers,’ Polymer, 34(5):942-951 (1993). |
Pitt, et al., ‘Modification of the rates of chain cleavage of poly(ε-caprolactone) and related polyesters in the solid state,’ Journal of Controlled Release, 4:283-292 (1987). |
Pitto, et al., “Comparison of fixation of the femoral component without cement and fixation with use of a bone-vacuum cementing technique for the prevention of fat embolism during total hip arthroplasty,” J. Bone Joint Surg., 81-A(6):831-843 (1999). |
Rak, et al., ‘The preparation and characterization of poly(DL-lactic acid) for use as a biodegradable drug carrier,’ Liverpool Polytech., Liverpool, UK, Pharmaceutica Acta Helvetiae, 60:(5-6):162-169 (1985). |
Ristic, et al., ‘An investigation of synthesis and degradation of poly(D,L-lactide) and controlled release of albumin from biodegradable poly(D,L-lactide) cylinders,’ ICheaP-2, the second Italian conference on chemical and process engineering, Florence, pp. 559-563 (1995). |
Schliephake, et al., ‘Reconstruction of the mandible by prefabricated autogenous bone grafts,’ Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg., 26:244-252 (1997). |
Stahelin, et al., ‘Clinical degradation and biocompatibility of different bioabsorbable interference screws: a report of six cases,’ Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery, 13(2):238-244 (1997). |
Steendam, et al., ‘The role of elastic relaxation in drug delivery from poly(DL-lactic acid) based tablets. A shape memory phenomenon,’ Proceedings of the International Symposium on Controlled Release of Bioactive Materials, 25:128-129 (1998). |
Stevels, et al., ‘Blends van blok copolymeren die een poly(L-lactide) of poly(D-lactide) blok bevatten,’ Biomedical Science and Engineering Meeting, pp. 107-110 (1994). |
Tagil, “Thesis—The morselized and impacted bone graft animal experiments on proteins, impaction and load,” Acta Orthop. Scand. Suppl., 290:1-40 (2000). |
Temenoff and Mikos, “Injectable biodegradable materials for orthopedic tissue engineering,” Biomaterials, 21:2405-2412 (2000). |
Tschakaloff, et al., ‘Degradation kinetics of biodegradable DL-polyactic acid biodegradable implants depending on the site of implantation,’ International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 23(6 Pt2):443-445 (1994). |
Tsuji, et al., ‘Stereocomplex formation between enantiomeric poly(lactic acid). VIII. Complex fibers spun from mixed solution of poly(D-lactic acid) and poly(L-lactic acid), Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 51(2):337-344 (1994). |
J. West, J. Hubbell, ‘Bioactive Polymers, Synthetic biodegradable polymer scaffolds,’ Chapter 5, pp. 83-95, Anthony Atala and David J. Mooney, Editors; Joseph P. Vacanti and Robert Langer, Associate Editors, Birkhauser (1997). |
D. Wheeler, et al., ‘Effect of bioactive glass particle size on osseous regeneration of cancellous defects,’ J. Biomed. Materials Research, 41(4):527-533 (1998). |
Zegzula, et al., ‘Bone Formation with Use of rhBMP-2 (Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2,’ The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 79:1778-1790 (1997). |
Zhang, ‘Biodegradable lactide polymers: synthesis, degradation, and controlled drug release properties (drug release), Queen's University at Kingston, Canada, vol. 55/01-B of Dissertation Abstracts International, p. i-xv, 1-179 (Oct. 1993). |
Structure and Properties of Orientated Polymers, Ed. I. M. Ward, Department of Physics, University of Leads, England, a Halsted Press Book, John Wiley & Sons, New York-Toronto (1975) Table of Contents. |
International Search Report; International PCT Application No. PCT/US2007/086067; Aug. 13, 2008; 5 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion; International PCT Application No. PCT/US2007/086067; Jun. 3, 2009; 11 pages. |
Patent Examination Report No. 1, Australian Patent Application No. 2007325001, Jun. 26, 2012; 4 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100137491 A1 | Jun 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60867978 | Nov 2006 | US |