Rigid structures are prone to critical failure when disturbances or perturbations result in high enough stress. Thus, rigid robotic structures are prone to critical failure. In contrast, soft structures are capable of bending to accommodate a disturbance and return to an operational state. In addition, there are several situations, such as tactile sensing, grasping, or in prosthetics where flexibility in a robotic actuator can prove advantageous to a desired action. A lack of supporting structural elements, however, means that actuation must be provided throughout a body in all three primary directions in order to maintain a desired shape. Furthermore traditional rigid robotic actuators do not drive motion of soft structures effectively, because they rely on transmitting large torques/forces through small contact points. Thus, there is a need in the art for soft structures for enhancing soft actuator's output and for restricting unwanted deformation.
Example embodiments provide a new use of soft composite structures as it relates to passively controlling soft body deformation through customizable anisotropic/asymmetric stress-strain properties; enhancing the output of a family of soft actuators and reducing both the number of required soft actuators and energy required to manipulate soft systems. The rise of soft robotics and other uses of soft systems has led to the development of several next generation soft actuators. There is a family of proposed soft actuators that we refer to as Poisson style soft actuators which generate a compressive force over a region of elastomeric material in order to drive an orthogonal expansion as governed by the material's Poisson ratio. These Poisson style soft actuators may include, but are not limited to, electro-active polymer actuators (also called dielectric actuators). Example embodiments provide an improved Poisson style soft actuator. Example embodiments provide a fiber reinforced actuator that provides increased expansion and/or deformation of the actuator in the preferred direction. Example embodiments include Poisson style soft actuators reinforced with fibers that are independently actuated (shape memory alloy fibers for example) to create bending motion or change material properties. Example embodiments include non-actuator composites that passively restrict deformation in unwanted directions while, as part of the same process, allowing and/or enhancing desired deformation in another direction. Example embodiments include soft composite structures composed of layers of fiber reinforced elastomeric sheets for impact damping and vibration damping. Various embodiments are provided for use in various soft systems, including soft robotics and passive soft structures.
In an aspect of the present invention, a fiber reinforced elastomeric sheet is provided. In an example embodiment, the fiber reinforced elastomeric sheet comprises a sheet of elastomeric matrix; and a fiber array comprising a plurality of fibers embedded within the elastomeric matrix. Each fiber of the array of fibers has a tensile modulus that is significantly greater than the tensile modulus of the elastomeric matrix.
In another aspect of the present invention, a fiber reinforced soft actuator is provided. In an example embodiment the soft actuator consists of two flexible conductor plates with a fiber reinforced elastomeric sheet in between. The sheet comprises of an elastomeric matrix; and a fiber array comprising a plurality of fibers within the matrix. For example, the fiber array may comprise a plurality of fibers embedded within the elastomeric matrix. The fiber array extends across the entire conductor area, in an example embodiment.
In another aspect of the present invention, a grasping robot is provided. In an example embodiment, the grasping robot comprises one or more fiber reinforced elastomeric sheets and a grasping component. Each of the one or more fiber reinforced elastomeric sheets comprises a sheet of elastomeric matrix; and a fiber array comprising a plurality of fibers embedded within the elastomeric matrix. Each fiber of the array of fibers has a tensile modulus that is significantly greater than the tensile modulus of the elastomeric matrix. In another example embodiment, the grasping mechanism consists of one or more fiber reinforced elastomeric sheets curved into a cylindrical tube. Each of the cylindrical fiber reinforced sheets (tubes) comprises a sheet of elastomeric matrix; and a fiber array comprising a plurality of fibers embedded within the elastomeric matrix. In an example embodiment, the grasping mechanism is configured to selectively receive and/or maintain (e.g., hold) one or more objects within the cylindrical tube formed of one or more elastomeric sheets.
Having thus described the invention in general terms, reference will now be made to the accompanying drawings, which are not necessarily drawn to scale, and wherein:
The present invention now will be described more fully hereinafter with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which some, but not all embodiments of the invention are shown. Indeed, the invention may be embodied in many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein; rather, these embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will satisfy applicable legal requirements. Like numbers refer to like elements throughout.
In example embodiments, the elastomeric sheet 1 may generally define a sheet plane. Generally the thickness of the elastomeric sheet is small. For example, the thickness of the elastomeric sheet 1 may be significantly smaller than the width or length of the elastomeric sheet 1. In an example embodiment, the elastomeric sheet 1 may be generally planer and the width and the length of the elastomeric sheet 1 may define the sheet plane. In another example embodiment, the elastomeric sheet 1 may be generally cylindrical or curved and the sheet plane may be locally defined as the plane tangent to the local curvature of the elastomeric sheet 1. For easy reference, the sheet plane defined by the width and length of the elastomeric sheet 1 will be referred to as the xy plane herein and the thickness, which is generally perpendicular and/or normal to the sheet plane, will be referred to as the z axis herein. In an example embodiment, the thickness of the elastomeric sheet 1 may be approximately one-tenth or less of the width and/or the length of the elastomeric sheet. In an example embodiment, the thickness of the elastomeric sheet 1 may be approximately 0.25 inches. Example embodiments may consist of one or more fiber reinforced elastomeric sheets representing laminates or layers of a larger composite structure.
In an example embodiment, the fibers 10 have a high tensile strength and a low and/or negligable bending rigidity. For example, each fiber 10 defines a fiber axis. The fiber 10 is rigid along the corresponding fiber axis but bends freely in directions tangent to the fiber axis. In an example embodiment, the tensile modulus of the fibers 10 may be significantly larger than the tensile modulus of the eleastomeric matrix of the elastomeric sheet 1. For example, the tensile modulus of the fibers 10 may be at least one order of magnitude larger than the tensile modulus of the eleastomeric matrix of the elastomeric sheet 1. In example embodiments, the tensile modulus of the fibers 10 may be at least three or six orders of magnitude larger than the tensile modulus of the eleastomeric matrix of the elastomeric sheet 1.
In an example embodiment, as shown in
Example embodiments allow for the expansion of the elastomeric sheet 1 to be controlled such that, when compressed, fiber reinforced elastomeric sheet 100 does not expand evenly, symmetrically, and/or the like in both the x and y directions. Rather, in an example embodiment, a preferred direction of expansion is prescribed. In an example embodiment, the preferred direction may be defined by the fiber array comprising the plurality of the fibers 10. In the example embodiments, shown in
for an elastomer in which volume is conserved, where εzz is the strain experienced by the fiber reinforced elastomeric sheet 100 in the compressed state 105 in the direction perpendicular and/or normal to the sheet plane (e.g., in the z direction). Additionally, the strain of the fiber reinforced elastomeric sheet 100 in a compressed state 105 in the preferred (e.g., x) direction ε′xx is increased, compared to strain in the x direction εxx of the non-reinforced elastomeric sheet 1, and the strain on the fiber reinforced elastomeric sheet 100 in a compressed state 105 in the counter (e.g., y) direction ε′yy is negative if the fiber angle is greater than zero. The strain in the y direction εyy of the non-reinforced elastomeric sheet 1 is positive.
In another example embodiment, the reinforced elastomeric sheet can be used with a Poisson style soft actuator to provide tension/compression in one of the planar directions. For example, due to fiber reorientation during compression in the z-direction the length l3 of the basic element 110 decreases, resulting in a negative strain εyy. This example embodiment cannot be realized by Poisson style actuators without organized reinforcement (e.g., unreinforced sheet 1). For example, compression of the unreinforced sheet 1, results in expansion in both planar directions. Therefore, compression of an elastomeric sheet will only result in compression in one of the planar directions through selective fiber reinforcement. In this example embodiment, if the soft actuator is desired to create planar expansion, the preferred direction is parallel to l4 in the basic element 110 (e.g. x), and if the soft actuator is desired to create planar compression, the desired direction is parallel to l3 (e.g. y),
As noted above, the compressed fiber angle θf is dependent on the initial fiber angle θ0 and the strain supplied in the z direction εzz. In an example embodiment, the fiber angle has a critical angle of θcrit=π/2 or 90°. In particular, in an example embodiment, compressing the fiber reinforced elastomeric sheet 100 such that θf≥θcrit may lead to stretching of the fibers, separation between the elastomeric sheet 1 and the embedded fibers 10 of the fiber array, and/or the like. Thus, in the example embodiment, the choice of the initial, uncompressed fiber angle θ0 governs the range of compressive forces that can be applied to the fiber reinforced elastomeric sheet 100. In an example embodiment, after the critical fiber angle has been reached the stress/strain properties in the sheet plane directions become symmetric, and the sheet can be treated as a standard composite.
In example embodiments, as a desired expansion and/or elongation of the fiber reinforced elastomeric sheet 100 in the compressed state 105, in the preferred direction can be realized with less compression εzz, the energy required to operate an actuator made of the fiber reinforced elastomeric sheet 100 can be significantly smaller than a non-reinforced elastomeric sheet 1. When the initial, uncompressed fiber angle θ0 is smaller, a greater compressive force may be applied to the fiber reinforced elastomeric sheet before the critical angle is reached. However, for a fiber array having a smaller initial fiber angle θ0, the negative strain in the orthogonal direction experienced during compression is smaller and therefore provides less benefit. If the initial fiber angle θ0 is larger, the negative strain in the orthogonal direction experienced during compression is significant, despite the reduced range of allowable compression before the compressed fiber angle θf reaches the critical angle θcrit. For a given desired elongation of the sheet, increasing fiber angle reduces the necessary compression, but at the cost of increased sheet stiffness, as more tension (elastic potential energy) is stored in the fibers in order to create the asymmetric deformation. Each desired expansion has an optimal fiber angle that balances these competing effects and minimizes the required energy for deformation. Thus, the initial fiber angle θ0 may be selected based on the desired expansion and/or elongation of the compressed fiber reinforced elastomeric sheet 105. In particular, the optimal initial fiber angle θ0 decreases as the desired expansion and/or elongation in the preferred direction increases. Moreover, the optimal initial fiber angle θ0 increases as the ratio between the fiber tensile modulus and the elastomeric sheet matrix elastic modulus increases, such that less potential energy is stored in the fibers 10. In an example embodiment, the optimal initial fiber angle θ0 is between 30° and 60° depending on the desired expansion and/or elongation of the compressed fiber reinforced elastomeric sheet 105. If the tensile modulus of the fiber is significantly greater than the tensile modulus of the elastomeric sheet matrix (e.g., the tensile modulus of the fiber is effectively infinite compared to the tensile modulus of the elastomeric sheet matrix), the optimal initial fiber angle θ0 may be as high as 68° for one application.
In another embodiment, where the fiber reinforced elastomeric sheet is used as a passive shape restoring mechanism, optimal fiber angle θ0 should be tuned, instead, to maximize potential energy storage. In another embodiment, where stacks of fiber reinforced elastomeric sheets are used for impact damping or vibration damping, the optimal fiber angle θ0 can be tuned with respect to the range of allowable strain and/or the vibration low pass cutoff frequency.
In an example embodiment, a compression force may be applied to a fiber reinforced elastomeric sheet 100 by using plates (e.g., plates 210) to physically compress the reinforced elastomeric sheet. In an example embodiment, the compressive force may be applied using electrostatic and/or electromagnetic forces. For example, the matrix of the elastomeric sheet may have an electrostatic or magnetic field dipole. The fiber reinforced elastomeric sheet 100, or a portion thereof, may be sandwiched between flexible conducting plates. The flexible conducting plates may be charged, creating a capacitive force there-between which compresses the sandwiched fiber reinforced elastomeric sheet 100. In another example embodiment, tension may be applied in the x or y directions to create significant non-linear contraction in the opposing direction. In another embodiment, the compressive force on the fiber reinforced elastomeric sheet 100 may be applied via hydrostatic pressure in pockets disposed adjacent the fiber reinforced elastomeric sheet 100 that filled with compressed air or another fluid. Other techniques of applying a compressive force may be utilized in various embodiments, as appropriate for the application.
The ability to control strain properties of a deformable material is advantageous in providing structural support for a number of soft systems. In example embodiments, one or more fiber reinforced elastomeric sheets 100 may be used in soft robotics such as artificial muscles configured for replacing damaged muscle tissue. In another example, one or more fiber reinforced elastomeric sheets 100 may be used in soft robotics such as compliant prosthetics. In an example embodiment, one or more fiber reinforced elastomeric sheets 100 may be used for various applications in walking and jumping robots. In an example embodiment, a walking or jumping robot may be a robot configured to move using a walking-like and/or jumping-like motion. For example, one or more fiber reinforced elastomeric sheets 100 may be used for one or more applications for robots that are configured to traverse difficult terrains. In another example embodiment, as shown in
Many modifications and other embodiments of the invention set forth herein will come to mind to one skilled in the art to which the invention pertains having the benefit of the teachings presented in the foregoing descriptions and the associated drawings. Therefore, it is to be understood that the invention is not to be limited to the specific embodiments disclosed and that modifications and other embodiments are intended to be included within the scope of the appended claims. Although specific terms are employed herein, they are used in a generic and descriptive sense only and not for purposes of limitation.
This application claims priority to U.S. Appl. No. 62/437,135, filed Dec. 21, 2016, the content of which is hereby incorporated in its entirety.
This invention was made with government support under N00014-16-1-2083 awarded by the United States Navy/Office of Naval Research. The government has certain rights in the invention.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62437135 | Dec 2016 | US |