The disclosure relates to an article comprising a substrate containing silicon and an environmental barrier coating (EBC) which functions as a protective environmental barrier coating and inhibits the formation of gaseous species of Si, particularly Si(OH)x when the article is exposed to a high temperature, steam-laden environment.
Ceramic materials containing silicon and metal alloys containing silicon have been proposed for structures used in high temperature applications as, for example, gas turbine engines, heat exchangers, internal combustion engines, and the like. A particularly useful application for these materials is for service in gas turbine engines which operate at high temperatures in steam-laden environments. The ceramic materials that operate within the gas turbine are exposed to an environment in which jet fuel is combusted. As a result of the combustion, the temperature is high and steam (vapor phase water) and oxygen are present.
It has been found that these silicon containing substrates can recede and lose mass as a result of a formation of volatile Si species, particularly Si(OH)x and SiO when exposed to high temperature, steam laden environments. For example, silicon carbide when exposed to a lean fuel environment of approximately 1 ATM pressure of water vapor at 1200° C. will exhibit weight loss and recession at a rate of approximately 6 mils per 1000 hrs.
It is believed that the process involves oxidation of the silicon carbide to form silica on the surface of the silicon carbide followed by reaction of the silica with steam to form volatile species of silicon such as Si(OH)x. Naturally it would be highly desirable to provide an external barrier coating for silicon containing substrates which would inhibit the formation of volatile silicon species, Si(OH)x and SiO, and thereby reduce recession and mass loss.
In accordance with the present disclosure, there is provided an environmental barrier coating, comprising an environmental barrier layer applied to a substrate containing silicon; the environmental barrier layer comprising an oxide matrix surrounding a fiber-reinforcement structure and a self-healing phase interspersed throughout the oxide matrix.
In another and alternative embodiment, the substrate comprises a ceramic matrix composite (CMC) material.
In another and alternative embodiment, the fiber-reinforcement structure comprises a continuous weave of fibers.
In another and alternative embodiment, the fiber-reinforcement structure comprises a SiC material composition.
In another and alternative embodiment, the fiber-reinforcement structure comprises at least one first fiber bundle oriented along a load bearing stress direction of the substrate.
In another and alternative embodiment, the substrate comprises a turbine blade, and the load bearing stress direction is oriented along a root to tip direction.
In another and alternative embodiment, the substrate comprises at least one of a turbine vane and a turbine blade, and the load bearing stress direction is oriented along the contour of a platform fillet.
In another and alternative embodiment, the fiber-reinforcement structure comprises at least one second fiber bundle oriented orthogonal to the first fiber bundle orientation.
In another and alternative embodiment, the fiber-reinforcement structure comprises at least one third fiber woven between the first fiber bundle and the second fiber bundle.
In another and alternative embodiment, the fiber-reinforcement structure comprises fibers that are oxygen getter loading materials.
In another and alternative embodiment, the fiber-reinforcement structure comprises fibers that are coated with an interface coating.
In another and alternative embodiment, the interface coating is selected from the group consisting of boron nitride, silicon carbide, an oxide and carbon.
In another and alternative embodiment, the matrix comprises a multi-phase mixture.
In another and alternative embodiment, the multi-phase mixture comprises SiO2.
In another and alternative embodiment, the self-healing phase comprises a glass phase.
In another and alternative embodiment, the self-healing phase comprises a material having properties of being in thermodynamic equilibrium with SiO2 during operation at predetermined temperatures.
In another and alternative embodiment, the self-healing phase comprises a material having properties of flowing into cracks formed in the matrix during operation at predetermined temperatures of between 1000° C. and 2000° C.
In another and alternative embodiment, the environmental barrier coating further comprises an oxygen getter phase interspersed throughout the matrix.
In another and alternative embodiment, the environmental barrier coating further comprises a protective layer applied on the environmental barrier coating.
The disclosure relates to a continuous fiber-reinforced, self-healing environmental barrier coating that prevents the ingress of oxygen and steam. The disclosed coating can increase durability with respect to conventional coatings. This coating consists of an oxide matrix and continuous fibers in a woven structure. The oxide matrix is a multi-phase mixture consisting of at least a SiO2 rich phase and a glass phase. In alternative embodiments, the oxide matrix can be a single phase material that may not include a self-healing functionality. The composition of the glass phase is chosen to be in thermodynamic equilibrium with SiO2 and to be sufficiently fluid at high temperatures to flow into cracks in the coating, which imparts ‘self-healing functionality.’ The fibers could be SiC, in some instances coated with an interface coating, such as boron nitride or silicon carbide, oxide (e.g. Nextel™ 720) or carbon.
Other details of the coating are set forth in the following detailed description and the accompanying drawings wherein like reference numerals depict like elements.
Referring now to
The substrate 12 of the article 14 can include portions that experience certain forces that result in a load bearing stress often oriented in a particular direction, i.e., a load bearing stress direction 16 of the substrate 12 of the article 14, illustrated as an arrow 16. It is contemplated that the load bearing stress direction 16 can be oriented in a variety of directions as well as multiple directions depending on the design of the substrate 12 and service of the article 14 in the gas turbine engine.
In an exemplary embodiment the load bearing stress direction 16 can be oriented from a root 18 of the article 14 to a tip 20 of the article 14, such as a blade root to a blade tip. In another exemplary embodiment, the load bearing stress direction 16 can be oriented along a contour of a fillet between a platform and an airfoil portion of the article 14, such as a blade/vane platform fillet 22. As illustrated in
The substrate 12 can be constructed from materials containing silicon and can be a ceramic matrix composite material, a silicon ceramic substrate or a silicon containing metal alloy. In an exemplary embodiment, the substrate 12 can be silicon containing ceramic material such as, for example, silicon carbide, silicon nitride, silicon oxy-nitride and silicon aluminum oxy-nitride. In accordance with a particular embodiment, the silicon containing ceramic substrate comprises a silicon containing matrix with reinforcing materials 24 such as fibers, particles and the like and, more particularly, a silicon based matrix which is fiber-reinforced. Particularly suitable ceramic substrates are a silicon carbide coated silicon carbide fiber-reinforced silicon carbide particle and silicon matrix, a carbon fiber-reinforced silicon carbide matrix and a silicon carbide fiber-reinforced silicon nitride matrix. Particularly useful silicon-metal alloys for use as substrates for the article 14 can include molybdenum-silicon alloys, niobium-silicon alloys, iron-silicon alloys, and aluminum-silicon alloys.
Referring also to
The environmental barrier layer 26 can include an oxide matrix 30 surrounding a fiber-reinforcement structure 32 and a self-healing phase 34 interspersed throughout the oxide matrix 30. In an alternative embodiment, the oxide matrix 30 can be a single phase without self-healing phase present. In another embodiment, the oxide matrix 30 can include a multi-phase mixture, such as SiO2 rich phase. The self-healing phase 34 can include a glass phase. The self-healing phase 34 can include a material having properties that are in thermodynamic equilibrium with SiO2 during operation at predetermined temperatures. The self-healing phase 34 comprises a material having properties of flowing into cracks 48 formed in the matrix 30 during operation at those predetermined temperatures. The self-healing phase 34 can be sufficiently fluid at high temperatures to flow into cracks 48 in the coating 10, which imparts a self-healing functionality. Between 1000° C. and 2000° C. these materials can exist as mixtures of solid and liquid phases. The temperature at which liquid formation occurs can be controlled by the chemical composition. In an exemplary embodiment, liquid formation initiates between 1150° C. and 1500° C., with the volume fraction of liquid increasing with temperature. The viscosity of the liquid phase can vary from 0.1 to 100,000 Pa*s with the exemplary viscosity varying between 10-10,000 Pa*s. An example of the self-healing phase 34 can include a mixture of BaMg2Al6Si9O30 and SiO2. Another example can include the mixture of CaAl2Si2O8, CaSiO3 and SiO2. Another example includes the mixture of Y2Si2O7, Al2O3 and SiO2. Alternatively, the materials listed above could be premixed and processed to form a glass. The initial composition of the glass could be: 2% BaO, 3% MgO, 10% AlO1.5, 85% SiO2, or 8% CaO, 17% AlO1.5 75% SiO2, or 10% YO1.5, 10 AlO1.5, 80% SiO2.
An oxygen getter phase 36 can also be interspersed throughout the oxide matrix 30. The oxygen getter phase 36 can comprise an oxy-carbide material. In an exemplary embodiment, the oxy-carbide material can include a glass that contains oxygen and carbon and silicon dioxide as well as particles of amorphous carbon and silicon carbide.
The fiber-reinforcement structure 32 can include a continuous weave of fibers. In an exemplary embodiment, the fiber-reinforcement structure 32 comprises a SiC material composition. The fiber-reinforcement structure 32 can include at least one first fiber bundle 38 oriented along the load bearing stress direction 16 of the substrate 12. In an exemplary embodiment, the first fiber bundle 38 can be oriented from blade root 18 to blade tip 20 and aligned along the root to tip direction, so as to provide structural support along the same orientation as the load bearing stress direction 16. In another exemplary embodiment, the first fiber bundle 38 can be oriented along the load bearing stress direction 16 oriented along the contour of the blade/vane platform fillet 22.
In another exemplary embodiment, the fiber-reinforcement structure 32 comprises at least one second fiber bundle 40 oriented orthogonal to the first fiber bundle 38 orientation. In another exemplary embodiment, the fiber-reinforcement structure 32 comprises at least one third fiber 42 woven between the first fiber bundle 38 and the second fiber bundle 40. In an exemplary embodiment, the fiber-reinforcement structure 32 comprises fibers that comprise oxygen getter materials 44. In another exemplary embodiment, the fiber-reinforcement structure 32 comprises fibers that are coated with an interface coating 46. The interface coating 46 can include materials selected from the group consisting of boron nitride, silicon carbide, an oxide and carbon.
The environmental barrier layer 26 can be present on the article at a thickness of greater than or equal to about 0.5 mils (0.0005 inch), preferably between about 3 to about 30 mils and ideally between about 3 to about 8 mils.
The environmental barrier layer 26 can be applied by preparing the substrate 12 surface.
There are several methods that could be used to introduce a glass-ceramic into the fiber reinforcement structure 32 being provided for the environmental barrier coating 10. In one approach, a fiber preform can be infiltrated using a glass particulate suspension, which would be added to the fiber preform layer by soaking, spraying or other means, at ambient temperature. The infiltrated fabric or preform is placed adjacent to the silicon containing CMC substrate 12, and the assembly is heated. Pressure can be applied using graphite dies, powdered media such as carbon or boron nitride, and the like, in order to de-gas the environmental barrier layer 26 at temperatures suitable for melting the glass. The subsequent assembly can undergo annealing to obtain a desired microstructure.
In another exemplary embodiment, an alternate technique of assembly would be to place a fiber preform in contact with the silicon containing CMC substrate 12. The fiber perform can then be rigidized using a variety of techniques, including but not limited to adding a ceramic sol and freezing the substrate followed by freeze drying. The assembly is then placed into a graphite die which comprises an outer profile of the EBC coated article 14. Molten glass is then injected into the die and flows into and among the fibers of the preform. The assembly can then be cooled and (re)heated to a temperature suitable to promote the formation of the desired microstructure.
Alternative approaches to introducing oxide or silicate phases into a relatively thin fiber preform, can include but are not limited to spraying the preform with a suspension, followed by heating the surface via flame or plasma spraying molten oxide and/or silicate materials onto the preform, and the like. Generally, sharp temperature gradients between the substrate and the created layer should be avoided to enhance adherence.
A self-healing, fiber-reinforced oxidant barrier offers a robust mechanism for protecting load bearing materials in the hot-section of gas turbine engines. This disclosure describes the use of fiber reinforcements in the environmental barrier coating to increase durability. Additionally, the self-healing, multi-phase matrix that surrounds the fibers inhibits the permeability of oxidants through the coating. The fibers will also increase the creep resistance of the coating, enhancing durability on rotating components.
An environmental barrier coating prevents CMC recession caused by Si(OH)x formation. Interaction of the environmental barrier coating with the steam laden combustion environment results in the formation of Si(OH)x, but the rate of formation is much less than that of an uncoated SiC CMC.
There has been provided a coating. While the coating has been described in the context of specific embodiments thereof, other unforeseen alternatives, modifications, and variations may become apparent to those skilled in the art having read the foregoing description. Accordingly, it is intended to embrace those alternatives, modifications, and variations which fall within the broad scope of the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3532438 | Palfreyman | Oct 1970 | A |
5113582 | Monson et al. | May 1992 | A |
5580837 | Dodds et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5858181 | Jindal et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
6117560 | Maloney | Sep 2000 | A |
6210182 | Hasz et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6228453 | Fareed et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6270852 | Ulion et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6284323 | Maloney | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6296941 | Eaton, Jr. et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6579636 | Oguri et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6730422 | Litton et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6924040 | Maloney | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7063894 | Sun et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7226672 | Litton et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7509735 | Philip et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7513955 | Kruger et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7622195 | Schlichting et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7862901 | Darolia et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7951459 | Tang et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7972657 | Schlichting et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8039113 | Kirby et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8062759 | Fu et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8084086 | Hass et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8111078 | Yang et al. | Feb 2012 | B1 |
8119247 | Kirby et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8216689 | Witz et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8217087 | Keller et al. | Jul 2012 | B1 |
8257559 | Floyd et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8273470 | Kirby et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8287635 | Luccarelli et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8343589 | Kirby et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8357454 | Kulkarni et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8470460 | Lee | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8512874 | Darolia et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8529999 | Maloney et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8574721 | Gero et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8658255 | Kirby et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8658291 | Kirby et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8663378 | Luccarelli et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8673400 | Kirby et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8940417 | Courcot et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
9034479 | Nagaraj et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9126873 | Diss et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9387512 | Lee et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9428650 | Meschter et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9611181 | Tang et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9713912 | Lee | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9771811 | Zhang et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9926238 | Louchet et al. | Mar 2018 | B2 |
9938839 | Rosenzweig et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9951630 | Hass | Apr 2018 | B2 |
20060099358 | Raybould et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060110609 | Eaton et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060115659 | Hazel et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20070292616 | Hazel | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080113218 | Schlichting et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20090155554 | Gentleman et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090186237 | Lee | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20100129636 | Cybulsky et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100129673 | Lee | May 2010 | A1 |
20100154422 | Kirby et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20110014060 | Bolcavage et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110217560 | Ridgeway | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110281107 | Gero et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120244383 | Meschter et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130122259 | Lee | May 2013 | A1 |
20130210299 | Zhang | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130260130 | Taxacher et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140065408 | Strock et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140271208 | Garcia-Crespo | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140272310 | Lazur et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150111063 | Khan et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150118444 | Lipkin et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150167141 | Rozenweig et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150308276 | Kleinow et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20160130188 | Louchet | May 2016 | A1 |
20160160664 | Luthra et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160186580 | Zaleski et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160214907 | Shim et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160332922 | Tang et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20170022113 | Opila | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170073278 | Landwehr et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170121232 | Nelson et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170145560 | Weaver et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170217842 | Sato | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170335118 | Tang et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170342539 | Sato et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20180170811 | Osada et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180305821 | Wan et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180347049 | Oboodi et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20180370862 | Kirby et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190084890 | Weaver | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20200040746 | Jackson et al. | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200055788 | Mikalsen et al. | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200080430 | Schmidt et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200123071 | Ndamka et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200331817 | Bianchi | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20220048828 | Liu et al. | Feb 2022 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102015205807 | Oct 2016 | DE |
1044944 | Oct 2000 | EP |
1806431 | Jul 2007 | EP |
1900848 | Mar 2008 | EP |
2189504 | May 2010 | EP |
2192098 | Jun 2010 | EP |
2388354 | Nov 2011 | EP |
2615250 | Jul 2013 | EP |
2644747 | Oct 2013 | EP |
3130577 | Feb 2017 | EP |
3162783 | May 2017 | EP |
3409653 | Dec 2018 | EP |
3954806 | Feb 2022 | EP |
2013103425 | Jul 2013 | WO |
2014204480 | Dec 2014 | WO |
2017031163 | Feb 2017 | WO |
2019069023 | Apr 2019 | WO |
Entry |
---|
European Search Report dated Dec. 6, 2019 issued for corresponding European Patent Application No. 19189903.8. |
European Search Report dated Jan. 13, 2020 issued for corresponding European Patent Application No. 19192162.6. |
European Search Report dated Jan. 7, 2020 issued for corresponding European Patent Application No. 19192131.1. |
European Search Report dated Jan. 3, 2020 issued for corresponding European Patent Application No. 19192124.6. |
Poerschke, David L. et al: “Interaction of yttrium disilicate environment barrier coatings with calcium-magnesium-iron alumino-silicate melts”, Acta Materalia., vol. 145, Dec. 19, 2017, pp. 451-461. |
Ahlborg, Nadia L., et al.: “Calcium-magnesium aluminosilicate (CMAS) reactions and degradation mechanisms of advanced environmental barrier coatings”, Surface and Coatings Technology, vol. 237, 2013, pp. 79-87. |
Zhao, Hengbei et al: “Molten silicate reactions with plasma sprayed ytterbium silicate coatings”, Surace and Coatings Technology, vol. 288, Jan. 14, 2016, pp. 151-162. |
Nikas, V. et al..(2015) Strong visible light emission from silicon-oxycarbide nanowire arrays prepared by electron beam lithography and reactive ion etching. Journal of Materials Research. 30. 1-8. (Year 2015). |
U.S. Office Action dated Mar. 14, 2022 issued for corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/998,730. |
U.S. Office Action dated Mar. 16, 2022 issued for corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/998,731. |
U.S. Non-Final Office Action dated Mar. 11, 2020 for corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/998,736. |
U.S. Non-final Office action dated Sep. 10, 2020 issued for corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 14/711,902. |
U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 2, 2010 issued for corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/998,736. |
U. Kolitsch, H.J. Seifert, and F. Aldinger, “Phase Relationships in the Systems RE2O3-AI2O3-SiO2 (RE = Rare Earth Element , Y, and Sc)” Journal of Phase Equilibria, vol. 19, No. 5, 1998. |
European Office action dated Mar. 7, 2018 issued for corresponding EP Patent Application No. 15168227.5. |
Latka, et al. “Thermal diffusivity and conductivity of yttria stabilized zirconia coatings obtained by suspension plasma spraying”, Surface & Coatings Technology 208 (2012), pp. 87-91, (Year 2012). |
Fauchals, et al. “Understanding of Suspension DC Plasma Spraying of Finely Structured Coatings for SOFC”, IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, vol. 33, No. 2, Apr. 2005, pp. 920-930. (Year: 2005). |
Qu, et al., “Thermal Conductivity of the gadolinium calcium silicate apatites: Effect of Different Point Defect Types”, Acta Materialia vol. 59, (2011), pp. 3841-3850. |
U.S. Non-final Office action dated Apr. 13, 2017 issued for corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 14/711,902. |
U.S. Non-final Office action dated Aug. 1, 2019 issued for corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 14/711,902. |
U.S. Final Office action dated Aug. 23, 2017 issued for corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 14/711,902. |
U.S. Final Office action dated Dec. 11, 2019 issued for corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 14/711,902. |
EP Search Report dated Sep. 28, 2015 issued for European Patent Application No. 15168227.5. |
U.S. Non-Final Office Action dated Jul. 17, 2019 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/998,736. |
U.S. Final Office Action dated Oct. 31, 2019 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/998,736. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200040746 A1 | Feb 2020 | US |