Fiber source with cascaded gain stages and/or multimode delivery fiber with low splice loss

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10971884
  • Patent Number
    10,971,884
  • Date Filed
    Friday, July 6, 2018
    6 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, April 6, 2021
    3 years ago
Abstract
An apparatus includes an optical gain fiber having a core, a cladding surrounding the core, the core and cladding defining an optical gain fiber numerical aperture, and a multimode fiber having a core with a larger radius than a radius of the optical gain fiber core, a cladding surrounding the core, the core and cladding of the multimode fiber defining a multimode fiber stable numerical aperture that is larger than the optical gain fiber numerical aperture, the multimode fiber being optically coupled to the optical gain fiber so as to receive an optical beam propagating in the optical gain fiber and to stably propagate the received optical beam in the multimode fiber core with low optical loss associated with the optical coupling.
Description
FIELD

The disclosure pertains to low loss optical couplings in high power optical sources.


BACKGROUND

Conventional continuous-wave fiber sources are typically designed to achieve high average powers, such as several 100 s of W to several kW, in output beams exhibiting superior beam quality. In most cases, an output beam at or near the diffraction limit is highly desirable since it can be focused to a smaller spot resulting in higher irradiance capabilities. Due to various practical benefits, such beams are typically obtained with single-mode fiber laser system architectures using cascaded fiber gain stages. Even for cascaded fiber laser systems, however, single-mode performance is only achieved by making various tradeoffs with respect to cost, reliability, and performance.


Cascaded systems typically include a single-mode seed source, such as a single-mode fiber oscillator, one or more fiber oscillator or fiber amplifier stages coupled to the seed beam in order to scale its power, and a delivery fiber for delivering the beam to a target. In typical systems, the seed beam propagates in a core of a double clad fiber while pump light coupled into the cladding of the fiber provides an energy source for amplification of the seed beam. Subsequent amplification or delivery fiber stages use larger fiber cores to prevent the onset of detrimental non-linear effects associated with the beam and to increase pump absorption, but increasing fiber core size detrimentally allows the beam to propagate in various transverse modes higher than the preferred single, fundamental mode. Hence, various techniques are employed to maintain single-mode beam performance in large mode area (LMA) fibers.


One way to maintain single-mode performance between gain stages is to coil one or more stages, including the current, previous, or subsequent stage, so that the higher order modes are suppressed. Gain stages can also be carefully coupled to each other, such as with adiabatic fiber tapers, mode field adapters, or precision alignment so that the fundamental mode of the beam in a preceding gain stage is carefully matched or launched into the fundamental mode of the subsequent gain stage. A design in which the core diameter is simply increased with no other change in fiber parameters can cause excess splice loss because of modal mismatch between the fibers. Also, an increased core diameter can support additional modes, encouraging multimode propagation, unless the numerical aperture is decreased to compensate. In general, power coupling efficiency degradation or other optical loss associated with various gain stage couplings are necessary hindrances of achieving single-mode performance despite the increased cost of components (MFAs, thermal management) and attendant decrease in reliability from the additional components and lossy connections. A need therefore exists for innovation in high power continuous-wave systems without the aforementioned drawbacks.


SUMMARY

According to some examples of the disclosed technology, an apparatus includes an optical gain fiber having a core, a cladding surrounding the core, the core and cladding defining an optical gain fiber numerical aperture, and a multimode fiber having a core with a larger radius than a radius of the optical gain fiber core, a cladding surrounding the core, the core and cladding of the multimode fiber defining a multimode fiber stable numerical aperture that is larger than the optical gain fiber numerical aperture, the multimode fiber being optically coupled to the optical gain fiber so as to receive an optical beam propagating in the optical gain fiber and to stably propagate the received optical beam in the multimode fiber core.


According to additional examples of the disclosed technology, a method includes selecting core diameter and numerical aperture of a gain fiber and larger core diameter and larger numerical aperture of a receiving multimode fiber so that a beam parameter product of an optical beam coupled from the gain fiber to the receiving multimode fiber is above an unstable threshold and is stable, and optically coupling the gain fiber and receiving multimode fiber.


According to another aspect of the disclosed technology, a fiber laser system includes a fiber oscillator seed source for generating an optical beam, the fiber oscillator seed source having a core diameter and numerical aperture, at least one pump source optically coupled to the fiber oscillator seed source for optically pumping the fiber oscillator seed source, and a multimode fiber amplifier having a core diameter and numerical aperture, the multimode fiber amplifier being optically coupled to the fiber oscillator seed source with an optical splice so as to receive the optical beam, wherein the multimode fiber amplifier core diameter and numerical aperture are larger than the fiber oscillator seed source core diameter and numerical aperture so as to define a core diameter difference and numerical aperture difference, the differences being selected to provide substantially reduced optical loss and a stable beam parameter product.


The foregoing and other objects, features, and advantages of the invention will become more apparent from the following detailed description, which proceeds with reference to the accompanying figures which can include features not drawn to scale.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a schematic of an apparatus including optical fibers optically coupled with a splice.



FIG. 2 is another schematic of an apparatus including optical fibers optically coupled with splices.



FIG. 3 is a schematic of an apparatus including optical fibers optically coupled with free space optics.



FIG. 4 is a flowchart of a method of reducing loss in an optical coupling between optical fibers.



FIG. 5 is a plot of mode power content against numerical aperture of a receiving optical fiber.



FIG. 6 is a plot of beam parameter product and beam radius against numerical aperture of a receiving fiber.



FIG. 7 is a schematic of a fiber laser system.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

As used in this application and in the claims, the singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the” include the plural forms unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Additionally, the term “includes” means “comprises.” Further, the term “coupled” does not exclude the presence of intermediate elements between the coupled items.


The systems, apparatus, and methods described herein should not be construed as limiting in any way. Instead, the present disclosure is directed toward all novel and non-obvious features and aspects of the various disclosed embodiments, alone and in various combinations and sub-combinations with one another. The disclosed systems, methods, and apparatus are not limited to any specific aspect or feature or combinations thereof, nor do the disclosed systems, methods, and apparatus require that any one or more specific advantages be present or problems be solved. Any theories of operation are to facilitate explanation, but the disclosed systems, methods, and apparatus are not limited to such theories of operation.


Although the operations of some of the disclosed methods are described in a particular, sequential order for convenient presentation, it should be understood that this manner of description encompasses rearrangement, unless a particular ordering is required by specific language set forth below. For example, operations described sequentially may in some cases be rearranged or performed concurrently. Moreover, for the sake of simplicity, the attached figures may not show the various ways in which the disclosed systems, methods, and apparatus can be used in conjunction with other systems, methods, and apparatus. Additionally, the description sometimes uses terms like “produce” and “provide” to describe the disclosed methods. These terms are high-level abstractions of the actual operations that are performed. The actual operations that correspond to these terms will vary depending on the particular implementation and are readily discernible by one of ordinary skill in the art.


In some examples, values, procedures, or apparatus' are referred to as “lowest”, “best”, “minimum,” or the like. It will be appreciated that such descriptions are intended to indicate that a selection among many used functional alternatives can be made, and such selections need not be better, smaller, or otherwise preferable to other selections. Examples are described with reference to directions indicated as “above,” “below,” “upper,” “lower,” and the like. These terms are used for convenient description, but do not imply any particular spatial orientation.


As used herein, optical radiation refers to electromagnetic radiation at wavelengths of between about 100 nm and 10 μm, and typically between about 500 nm and 2 μm. Examples based on available laser diode sources and optical fibers generally are associated with wavelengths of between about 800 nm and 1700 nm. In some examples, propagating optical radiation is referred to as one or more beams having diameters, beam cross-sectional areas, and beam divergences that can depend on beam wavelength and the optical systems used for beam shaping. For convenience, optical radiation is referred to as light in some examples, and need not be at visible wavelengths.


Representative embodiments are described with reference to optical fibers, but other types of optical waveguides can be used having square, rectangular, polygonal, oval, elliptical or other cross-sections. Optical fibers are typically formed of silica (glass) that is doped (or undoped) so as to provide predetermined refractive indices or refractive index differences. In some, examples, fibers or other waveguides are made of other materials such as fluorozirconates, fluoroaluminates, fluoride or phosphate glasses, chalcogenide glasses, or crystalline materials such as sapphire, depending on wavelengths of interest. Refractive indices of silica and fluoride glasses are typically about 1.5, but refractive indices of other materials such as chalcogenides can be 3 or more. In still other examples, optical fibers can be formed in part of plastics. In typical examples, a doped waveguide core such as a fiber core provides optical gain in response to pumping, and core and claddings are approximately concentric. In other examples, one or more of the core and claddings are decentered, and in some examples, core and cladding orientation and/or displacement vary along a waveguide length.


As used herein, numerical aperture (NA) refers to a largest angle of incidence with respect to a propagation axis defined by an optical waveguide for which propagating optical radiation is substantially confined. In optical fibers, fiber cores and fiber claddings can have associated NAs, typically defined by refractive index differences between a core and cladding layer, or adjacent cladding layers, respectively. While optical radiation propagating at such NAs is generally well confined, associated electromagnetic fields such as evanescent fields typically extend into an adjacent cladding layer. In some examples, a core NA is associated with a core/inner cladding refractive index, and a cladding NA is associated with an inner cladding/outer cladding refractive index difference. For an optical fiber having a core refractive index ncore and a cladding index nclad, a fiber core NA is NA=√{square root over (ncors2−nclad2)}. For an optical fiber with an inner core and an outer core adjacent the inner core, a cladding NA is NA=√{square root over (ninner2−nouter2)}, wherein ninner and nouter are refractive indices of the inner cladding and the outer cladding, respectively. Optical beams as discussed above can also be referred to as having a beam NA which is associated with a beam angular radius. While multi-core step index fibers are described below, gradient index designs can also be used.


In the examples disclosed herein, a waveguide core such as an optical fiber core is doped with a rare earth element such as Nd, Yb, Ho, Er, or other active dopants or combinations thereof. Such actively doped cores can provide optical gain in response to optical or other pumping. As disclosed below, waveguides having such active dopants can be used to form optical amplifiers, or, if provided with suitable optical feedback such as reflective layers, mirrors, Bragg gratings, or other feedback mechanisms, such waveguides can generate laser emissions. Optical pump radiation can be arranged to co-propagate and/or counter-propagate in the waveguide with respect to a propagation direction of an emitted laser beam or an amplified beam. In some examples, doped single-mode or doped multimode optical fibers are referred to as gain fibers, fiber oscillators, or fiber amplifiers, although it will be appreciated that such fibers typically include additional components as well, such as pump sources, pump couplers, and optical feedback elements, such as fiber Bragg gratings.


The term brightness is used herein to refer to optical beam power per unit area per solid angle. Selection of beam area and beam solid angle can produce pump beams that couple selected pump beam powers into one or more core or cladding layers of double, triple, or other multi-clad optical fibers.



FIG. 1 shows a cross-sectional schematic of a cascaded fiber laser apparatus 100 having an optical gain fiber 102 optically coupled to a multimode fiber 104 with an optical splice. The optical gain fiber 102 has a core 106 situated about an optical propagation axis 108 and a cladding 110 surrounding the core 106. The core and cladding have predetermined diameters or shapes defining corresponding cross-sectional areas. The core and cladding also have predetermined refractive indexes different from each other so as to define a numerical aperture associated with the core 106. Multimode fiber 104 includes a core 112 and cladding 114 having predetermined diameters or shapes defining cross-sectional areas, with the core 112 being larger than the core 106 of the optical gain fiber 102. The core and cladding of the multimode fiber 104 have predetermined refractive indexes different from each other so as to define a numerical aperture associated with the core 112 which is larger than the numerical aperture of the core 106. Optical gain fiber 102 and multimode fiber 104 can include one or more additional claddings or layers surrounding the claddings 110, 114.


An optical beam 116 propagating in the core 106 expands to fill the larger core 112 and to excite additional transverse modes associated with the multimode fiber 104. The amount by which the numerical aperture of the core 112 of the multimode fiber 104 exceeds the numerical aperture of the core 106 of the optical gain fiber 102 is selected so that an optical loss associated with the optical coupling of the spliced fibers 102, 104 is substantially reduced. In suitable examples, such substantial reduction corresponds to a low optical loss below 0.5% of total optical power of an optical beam transiting the optical coupling, though in additional examples such optical loss can be reduced to below 0.2%, 0.05%, or lower. An apparatus such as the apparatus 100 having optical gain fiber numerical apertures that are greater than or equal to multimode fiber numerical apertures may produce various desirable optical beam features (such as preservation of fundamental mode propagation) but also exhibit an optical loss associated with the optical coupling that varies according to selected fiber parameters but is generally from a few percent to several percent. For high power optical beams, including, for example, beam powers of several hundred watts to several kilowatts, a few percent loss can lead to premature degradation or failure of laser system components and an undesirable performance reduction, particularly for cascaded systems in which optical loss accumulates and compounds across multiple splices.


Optical losses for apparatuses such as the apparatus 100 can vary based on selected fiber parameters, such as with (but without limitation) the wavelength of the optical beam 116, the use of different optical fiber compositions and structures, or with different splicing tools used to generate the optical coupling splice. In general, in an optical coupling of a multimode fiber to a gain fiber, increases in multimode fiber numerical aperture above gain fiber numerical aperture are associated with minimal reduction in optical loss unless a threshold multimode numerical aperture or multimode fiber to gain fiber numerical aperture difference is exceeded. At such a loss threshold, a substantial reduction in optical loss is typically achieved. Additional reductions in optical loss can be obtained by further increasing multimode fiber numerical aperture, but generally with diminishing returns. It will be appreciated that low-loss multimode fiber numerical apertures can also be selected and the optical gain fiber core numerical aperture can be adjusted relative to the selected larger multimode fiber numerical aperture to achieve suitable low-loss optical coupling.


The numerical aperture of the core 112 is also selected so that a beam parameter product (bpp) associated with the optical beam is stable as opposed to unstable. Unstable numerical apertures produce optical beams with unstable bpps that are variable from apparatus to apparatus as fiber parameters, such as refractive indexes, shapes, diameters, splice positions, etc., for the optical gain fiber, multimode fiber, or other components vary according to normal tolerances. In general, such variable or unstable bpps associated with unstable numerical apertures are also higher, and therefore less desirable, than a bpp of the optical beam 116 in the multimode fiber 104 having a stable core numerical aperture. In suitable examples, stable or constant bpps associated with stable numerical apertures vary less than about 5%, 2%, 1%, or 0.5% from apparatus to apparatus according to normal manufacturing tolerances. Unstable numerical apertures can be observed that produce bpps which vary by greater than about 5%, 10%, 20%, 50%, or more between apparatuses based on a target bpp. Unstable numerical apertures can also produce unstable bpps that vary undesirably or unpredictably during operation of a particular apparatus, including at a selected output power or range of output powers. In some examples, an unstable bpp can vary by greater than about 5%, 10%, 20%, 50%, or more during operation of a laser apparatus.


Once a stable, low-loss numerical aperture, or numerical aperture difference, is obtained, as mentioned above, a smaller decrease in optical loss is achieved as the optical loss for the optical coupling approaches zero or other loss floor for each unit increase in multimode fiber numerical aperture or corresponding numerical aperture difference. Increasing numerical aperture in the multimode fiber (or decreasing the numerical aperture of the optical gain fiber) also tends to become less practical. For example, available materials to vary numerical aperture can limit the extent to which refractive index may be increased or decreased, or other fiber parameters, such as numerical apertures associated with the optical gain fiber or multimode fiber claddings 110, 114 can limit the extent of the selected difference between optically coupled core numerical apertures. An achievable stable multimode fiber numerical aperture can be selected in view of various laser parameters or constraints.


The stable multimode fiber numerical aperture, or the numerical aperture difference, can also be selected so that a numerical aperture margin is provided which allows the apparatus 100 to maintain a stable bpp or other stable characteristics of the optical beam 116 associated with the optical coupling as fiber parameters vary according to normal tolerances. In some examples, a stable multimode fiber numerical aperture is selected with a numerical aperture margin which is within 0.5%, 1%, 2%, 5%, 10%, 20%, or 50% of the stable multimode fiber numerical aperture. In other examples, a stable multimode fiber numerical aperture is selected with a margin of 0.01 ΔNA, 0.1 ΔNA, 0.5 ΔNA, 1 ΔNA, or 5 ΔNA above a multimode fiber numerical aperture value that is borderline stable or that just becomes stable. It will be appreciated that stable optical couplings with numerical aperture margin can also be obtained by adjusting an optical gain fiber core numerical aperture, both core numerical apertures, or the difference between the core numerical apertures.


In representative examples, optical gain fiber 102 is a single-mode fiber having a core diameter which only allows propagation of the optical beam 116 in the fundamental transverse LP01 mode. In a particular example, the optical gain fiber 102 having the core 106 doped with ytterbium, a corresponding lasing wavelength of the optical beam 116 can be about 1080 nm. For a corresponding core numerical aperture of 0.06 NA, single-mode behavior occurs for diameters of less than about 10 μm. In other examples, optical gain fiber 102 has a few mode core or an LMA core with a diameter larger than a single-mode fiber so that the core 106 may be capable of supporting higher order modes. The higher order modes can be suppressed in different ways, such as through coiling of the fiber 102, photonic crystal microstructures, chirally coupled core microstructures, etc., so as to allow propagation of the optical beam 116 substantially in the fundamental transverse LP01 mode only. The higher order modes can also be allowed to propagate so that the optical beam 116 propagating in the optical gain fiber 102 is multimode.


In a particular example, the optical gain fiber 102 has a ytterbium doped core 106 with a corresponding lasing wavelength of about 1080 nm. With a core numerical aperture of 0.0805 NA and a core diameter of 13.2 μm, single-mode LP01 optical beam characteristics can be obtained through coiling of the optical gain fiber 102. Depending on the characteristics of the laser system associated with apparatus 100, optical gain fiber can be situated as a fiber oscillator, providing optical gain through feedback between reflective elements, or as a fiber amplifier, generating optical gain without substantial feedback. It will be appreciated that optical gain fiber 102 can include one or more optical fiber elements optically coupled or spliced together such that the optical fiber element optically coupled to the multimode fiber 104 may be a passive section of the optical gain fiber 102.


In representative examples of apparatus 100, multimode fiber 104 is a multimode gain fiber or a multimode fiber without active dopants, such as a multimode delivery fiber. The actively doped multimode fiber 104 includes the core 110 with a diameter larger than the diameter associated with the core 106 of the optical gain fiber 102. The core 110 of the multimode gain fiber is doped to provide optical gain to the optical beam 116 received from the optical gain fiber 102. It will be appreciated that actively doped multimode fiber 104 can include one or more optical fiber elements optically coupled or spliced together such that the optical fiber element optically coupled to the optical gain fiber 102 may be a passive section of the actively doped multimode fiber 104. Multimode fiber 104 examples can include multimode delivery fibers which typically lack active dopants along the entire length. Delivery fibers are typically used to direct the high power optical beam 116 to a target work surface.


In a particular example, the core 110 of the multimode fiber 104 is doped with ytterbium to provide laser amplification at 1080 nm and the diameter of the core 110 is about 39.2 μm. The numerical aperture of the core 110 is selected in relation to the numerical aperture of the core 106 so that the optically coupling of the optical gain fiber and multimode fiber is provided with low optical loss and so that the bpp of the optical beam 116 propagating in the multimode gain fiber is stable. A numerical aperture margin can be provided so that with fiber parameter variation within tolerances, different implementations of the apparatus 100 do not tend to operate with an unstable bpp. The diameters of the cores 106, 110 can also be adjusted to achieve a suitable numerical aperture or numerical aperture difference.


In a particular example, with the optical gain fiber 102 having a core numerical aperture of 0.0805 NA and a core diameter of 13.2 μm and providing the optical beam 116 at a wavelength of about 1080 nm, the multimode fiber 104 having a core numerical aperture of 0.10 and a core diameter of 39.2 um is optically coupled with a fusion splice to receive the optical beam 116 and to amplify the beam at 1080 nm. Little or no reduction in optical loss associated with the optical splice is observed for multimode fiber core numerical apertures less than about 0.09, the optical loss being about 2% of total optical beam power. Substantial reduction in optical loss is found for multimode fiber core numerical apertures greater than about 0.09 but variable bpp and other performance characteristics are found in the optical beam 116. At about 0.095, the multimode fiber core numerical aperture provides stable bpp for the optical beam 116 but normal variation in fiber parameters within tolerances from apparatus to apparatus can cause an apparatus to have an unstable bpp or other beam characteristics. At about 0.10, the multimode fiber core numerical aperture provides a loss very close to zero, with a stable bpp and with enough numerical aperture margin or buffer so that normal variation in fiber parameters for the optical gain fiber 102, multimode fiber 104, or other system components or operational characteristics, does not result in a significant number of variably performing apparatuses.



FIG. 2 shows a cross-sectional schematic of a fiber apparatus 200 which generally includes an optical gain fiber 202 optically coupled with a fusion splice to a multimode optical gain fiber 204 which is optically coupled with a fusion splice to a multimode fiber 206. An optical beam 208 is generated or amplified or both by propagation through the apparatus 200. The optical gain fiber 202 includes an active core 210 having a selected diameter and numerical aperture for generating or amplifying and also propagating the optical beam 208. Multimode optical gain fiber 204 includes an active core 212 having a selected diameter and numerical aperture which are larger than the core diameter and numerical aperture associated with the optical gain fiber 202. Multimode fiber 206 includes a core 214 having a selected diameter and numerical aperture which are larger than the core diameter and numerical aperture associated with the multimode optical gain fiber 204. Each core diameter and numerical aperture increase between adjacently optically coupled fibers is selected so that an optical loss associated with the optical coupling is substantially reduced and the bpp of the optical beam 208 is provided in a stable configuration in the downstream adjacent fiber. The selection of core and numerical aperture can also provide a variability margin that prevents the optical beam 208 from drifting into an unstable bpp range in view of fiber parameter variation according to normal tolerances in the manufacture of like apparatuses 200.


In a representative example, optical gain fiber 202 is a fiber oscillator situated to generate an optical beam substantially in the fundamental mode, the multimode optical gain fiber 204 is a multimode fiber amplifier situated to amplify the optical beam 208 received from the optical gain fiber 202, and the multimode fiber 206 is a multimode delivery fiber situated to receive the optical beam 208 which has been amplified by the optical gain fiber 204 and to deliver the beam 208 to a target. In various examples, optical gain fiber 202 can have a single-mode core, few-mode core, or a multimode core. In further examples, multimode fiber 206 can be an actively doped multimode fiber amplifier.



FIG. 3 shows a cross-sectional schematic of a fiber apparatus 300 which includes an optical gain fiber 302 situated to propagate an optical beam 304 in a core 306 thereof, a multimode optical fiber 308 situated to receive and propagate the beam 304 in a multimode core 310, and free-space optics 312 situated to receive the optical beam 304 from the optical gain fiber 302 and to couple the beam into the multimode core 310 of the multimode optical fiber 308. The diameters and numerical apertures of the cores 306, 310 are selected to substantially reduce optical loss that may be associated with the optical coupling of the beam 304 with the free-space optics 312 and to further provide the optical beam 304 with a stable bpp that varies minimally between apparatuses 300 given normal variation of fiber parameters according to specification tolerances.


In FIG. 4, an exemplary method 400 for providing a high power optical beam includes, at 402, selecting a preceding gain stage core diameter and core numerical aperture. At 404, a subsequent multimode stage core diameter and numerical aperture are selected which are larger than the core diameter and core numerical aperture of the preceding gain stage. The core diameters and numerical apertures are selected to provide a substantial reduction in coupling loss and stable optical beam characteristics, including bpp. The core diameters and numerical apertures can be further selected at 406 to provide a stability margin allowing repeatable low-loss and stable optical beam characteristics as fiber parameters may vary according to normal tolerances. At 408, the preceding gain stage and subsequent multimode stage are optically coupled via fusion splicing or free-space optics so that a high power optical beam is produced.



FIG. 5 is a chart 500 depicting power of an optical beam for different numerical apertures of a multimode fiber spliced to and receiving the beam power from a preceding optical fiber. In particular, the preceding fiber propagates an optical beam at 1550 nm in the fundamental LP01 mode through a core having a diameter of 13.2 μm and a core numerical aperture of 0.0805. The total optical beam power 502 in the multimode fiber with a core diameter of 39.2 μm is plotted against numerical aperture of the multimode fiber. When the core numerical aperture of the preceding fiber at 0.0805 is matched to the numerical aperture of the spliced multimode fiber receiving the optical beam, an optical coupling loss of around 7% is observed. It should be noted that for shorter wavelengths such optical coupling loss is typically lower, such as around 2%, and consequently more difficult to detect or more likely to be considered to be within a manufacturing tolerance.


As the core numerical aperture of the receiving multimode fiber is increased steadily to near 0.090 NA, a small decrease in optical loss is seen followed by a large decrease in optical loss from 0.090 NA to about 0.095 NA. The sudden decrease in optical loss at a threshold numerical aperture may be associated with a mode coupling threshold as the optical beam in the preceding fiber which can have fewer modes couples into the supported modes of the multimode fiber. For multimode fiber core numerical apertures above about 0.095 NA, diminishes to close to 0% optical loss. Also depicted in FIG. 5 are the various modal power contents for the modes of the optical beam propagating in the multimode fiber core for different multimode core numerical apertures.



FIG. 6 is a chart 600 depicting bpp 602 and beam radius 604 for the optical beam in the multimode fiber, as described for FIG. 5, across a similar range of core numerical apertures of the multimode fiber. As numerical aperture of the multimode fiber core increases past a numerical aperture matched to the numerical aperture of the preceding fiber, bpp remains unchanged until the mode coupling threshold is reached. As the numerical aperture increases past the threshold, highly variable bpp and beam radius fluctuations are observed until a stable numerical aperture is reached. Once the stable numerical aperture is selected beam radius begins to decrease more smoothly without fluctuating behavior and the bpp becomes consistent with increasing multimode fiber core numerical aperture.



FIG. 7 is a schematic of a fiber laser system 700 which includes a fiber oscillator 702, a plurality of pump sources 704, a multimode fiber amplifier 706, and a delivery fiber 708. The fiber oscillator 702 gain fiber includes a high reflecting (HR) fiber portion 710 optically coupled with a splice 712 to an end of an actively doped fiber portion 714 and partial reflecting (PR) fiber portion 716 optically coupled with a splice 718 to an opposite end of the actively doped fiber portion 714. The HR fiber portion 710 includes a fiber Bragg grating (FBG) 720 written in its core, which can be active or passive, and which predominantly reflects light at a lasing wavelength associated with the actively doped fiber portion 714. HR reflectivities are typically at least about 80%, 95%, 99%, 99.9%, or higher. The PR fiber portion 716 includes an FBG 722 written in its core, which can be active or passive, and which both reflects and transmits light at the lasing wavelength. PR reflectivities can vary considerably depending on system gain requirements, such as being below 20%, 50%, 80%, 95%, or 99%. The pump sources 704 are optically coupled to a pump combiner 724 which combines and couples the light from the pump sources into a pump delivery fiber 726. The pump delivery fiber 726 is coupled to the HR fiber portion 710 via an optical splice 728. The pump light provides energy for laser feedback and amplification in the fiber oscillator and amplifier 702, 706.


The PR fiber portion 716 of the fiber oscillator 702 is optically coupled to the fiber amplifier 706 with an optical splice 730. A seed beam generated in the fiber oscillator 702 is thereby coupled into the fiber amplifier 706 for substantial amplification. The fiber amplifier 706 is optically coupled to the delivery fiber 708 at an optical splice 732. The delivery fiber 708 receives the amplified beam from the fiber amplifier 706 and directs the beam to a target (not shown). At optical splices 730, 732, the optical fiber cores step up in diameter typically resulting in an amount of undesirable optical loss. Numerical apertures of adjoining fibers at such optical splices are chosen to have a predetermined difference with the larger core downstream fiber having a larger numerical aperture than the upstream fiber. The numerical aperture difference is selected so as to provide the optically coupled beam with a substantially reduced loss, so that a propagating optical beam experiences a reduction in optical power of 0.5% or less in some examples. The numerical aperture difference can also be selected so that the bpp of the optically coupled beam does not experience substantial variability. A numerical aperture margin can be provided so that variation between manufactured fiber laser systems 700 due to manufacturing tolerances can buffer against the possibility of the characteristics of the beam, such as bpp or beam radius, of a system 700 of being variable or out of tolerance. Such margin can be selected to be below a numerical aperture difference that can cause a beam radius reduction that would exacerbate nonlinear effects or below a numerical aperture difference that is impractical due to limitations associated with fiber doping to achieve different numerical apertures or other system or fiber constraints such as cladding numerical apertures.


In view of the many possible embodiments to which the principles of the disclosed technology may be applied, it should be recognized that the illustrated embodiments are only representative examples and should not be taken as limiting the scope of the disclosure. Alternative specifically addressed in these sections are merely exemplary and do not constitute all possible alternatives to the embodiments described herein. For instance, various components of systems described herein may be combined in function and use. We therefore claim as our invention all that comes within the scope and spirit of these claims.

Claims
  • 1. A cascaded fiber laser, comprising: an optical gain fiber section having a first core, a first cladding surrounding the first core, the first core and first cladding defining a first numerical aperture (NA); anda first multimode fiber section coupled to the optical gain fiber, having a second core comprising a larger radius than a radius of the first core, a second cladding surrounding the second core, the second core and cladding defining a second NA that is larger than the first NA by a first margin selected to maintain a substantially stable beam parameter product (BPP) of an optical beam coupled from the optical gain fiber section into the multimode fiber section above a predetermined threshold stable BPP.
  • 2. The cascaded fiber laser of claim 1, wherein the margin is associated with a low optical loss.
  • 3. The cascaded fiber laser of claim 2, wherein the low optical loss amounts to a reduction in optical power of 0.5% or less in the optical beam upon propagation from the optical gain fiber section to the first multimode fiber section.
  • 4. The cascaded fiber laser of claim 1, wherein the optical gain fiber section is a single-mode fiber.
  • 5. The cascaded fiber laser of claim 1, wherein the selected margin is within 0.5%, 1%, 2%, 5%, 10%, 20%, or 50% of an identified stable margin value associated with the predetermined threshold stable BPP.
  • 6. The cascaded fiber laser of claim 1, wherein the first multimode fiber section is optically coupled to the optical gain fiber section with a fusion optical splice.
  • 7. The cascaded fiber laser of claim 1, wherein the first multimode fiber section is coupled to the optical gain fiber section with free-space optics.
  • 8. The cascaded fiber laser of claim 1, wherein the optical gain fiber section is a fiber oscillator.
  • 9. The cascaded fiber laser of claim 8, wherein the optical gain fiber section includes an optical fiber element coupled to the first multimode fiber section that is a passive portion of the optical gain fiber section.
  • 10. The cascaded fiber laser of claim 1, wherein the optical gain fiber section is a few mode fiber.
  • 11. The cascaded fiber laser of claim 10, further comprising one or more higher order mode suppression features.
  • 12. The cascaded fiber laser of claim 1, wherein the first margin is selected so as to provide a variability margin that prevents the optical beam from drifting into an unstable BPP within a predetermined tolerance range.
  • 13. The cascaded fiber laser of claim 1, further comprising: a second multimode fiber section coupled to the first multimode fiber section and configured to receive the optical beam, wherein the second multimode fiber section comprises a third core having a larger radius than a radius of the second core, a third cladding surrounding the third core, the third core and cladding defining a third NA that is larger than the second NA by a second margin selected to maintain the substantially stable BPP of the optical beam above a predetermined threshold stable BPP.
  • 14. The cascaded fiber laser of claim 13, wherein the optical gain fiber section is a single-mode fiber oscillator, the first multimode fiber section is a multimode fiber amplifier, and the second multimode fiber section is a multimode optical beam delivery fiber.
  • 15. The cascaded fiber laser of claim 14, wherein the second margin is selected so as to provide a variability margin that prevents the optical beam from drifting into an unstable BPP within a predetermined tolerance range.
  • 16. The cascaded fiber laser of claim 15, wherein the predetermined tolerance range is based on fiber parameter manufacturing variation.
  • 17. The cascaded fiber laser of claim 2, wherein the low optical loss is associated with excitation by the optical beam of higher order modes of the multimode fiber.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/074,838, filed Mar. 18, 2016, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/138,926, filed Mar. 26, 2015, both of which are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.

US Referenced Citations (419)
Number Name Date Kind
3388461 Lins Jun 1968 A
4138190 Bryngdahl Feb 1979 A
4252403 Salisbury Feb 1981 A
4266851 Salisbury May 1981 A
4475027 Pressley Oct 1984 A
4475789 Kahn Oct 1984 A
4713518 Yamazaki et al. Dec 1987 A
4863538 Deckard Sep 1989 A
4953947 Bhagavatula Sep 1990 A
4998797 van den Bergh et al. Mar 1991 A
5008555 Mundy Apr 1991 A
5082349 Cordova-Plaza et al. Jan 1992 A
5129014 Bloomberg Jul 1992 A
5153773 Muraki et al. Oct 1992 A
5231464 Ichimura et al. Jul 1993 A
5237150 Karube Aug 1993 A
5252991 Storlie et al. Oct 1993 A
5319195 Jones et al. Jun 1994 A
5463497 Muraki et al. Oct 1995 A
5475415 Noethen Dec 1995 A
5475704 Lomashevich Dec 1995 A
5509597 Laferriere Apr 1996 A
5523543 Hunter, Jr. et al. Jun 1996 A
5566196 Scifres Oct 1996 A
5684642 Zumoto et al. Nov 1997 A
5719386 Hsieh et al. Feb 1998 A
5745284 Goldberg et al. Apr 1998 A
5748824 Smith May 1998 A
5761234 Craig et al. Jun 1998 A
5818630 Fermann et al. Oct 1998 A
5832415 Wilkening et al. Nov 1998 A
5841465 Fukunaga et al. Nov 1998 A
5864430 Dickey et al. Jan 1999 A
5903696 Krivoshlykov May 1999 A
5909306 Goldberg et al. Jun 1999 A
5932119 Kaplan et al. Aug 1999 A
5986807 Fork Nov 1999 A
5999548 Mori et al. Dec 1999 A
6072184 Okino et al. Jun 2000 A
6132104 Bliss et al. Oct 2000 A
6265710 Miller et al. Jul 2001 B1
6275630 Yang et al. Aug 2001 B1
6310995 Saini et al. Oct 2001 B1
6330382 Harshbarger et al. Dec 2001 B1
RE37585 Mourou et al. Mar 2002 E
6353203 Hokodate et al. Mar 2002 B1
6362004 Noblett Mar 2002 B1
6417963 Ohishi et al. Jul 2002 B1
6433301 Dunsky et al. Aug 2002 B1
6434177 Jurgensen Aug 2002 B1
6434302 Fidric et al. Aug 2002 B1
6483973 Mazzarese et al. Nov 2002 B1
6490376 Au et al. Dec 2002 B1
6496301 Koplow et al. Dec 2002 B1
6542665 Reed et al. Apr 2003 B2
6556340 Wysocki et al. Apr 2003 B1
6569382 Edman et al. May 2003 B1
6577314 Yoshida et al. Jun 2003 B1
6639177 Ehrmann et al. Oct 2003 B2
6671293 Kopp et al. Dec 2003 B2
6711918 Kliner et al. Mar 2004 B1
6724528 Koplow et al. Apr 2004 B2
6772611 Kliner et al. Aug 2004 B2
6777645 Ehrmann et al. Aug 2004 B2
6779364 Tankala et al. Aug 2004 B2
6801550 Snell et al. Oct 2004 B1
6819815 Corbalis et al. Nov 2004 B1
6825974 Kliner et al. Nov 2004 B2
6839163 Jakobson et al. Jan 2005 B1
6882786 Kliner et al. Apr 2005 B1
6895154 Johnson et al. May 2005 B2
6917742 Po Jul 2005 B2
6941053 Lauzon et al. Sep 2005 B2
6963062 Cyr et al. Nov 2005 B2
6989508 Ehrmann et al. Jan 2006 B2
7068900 Croteau et al. Jun 2006 B2
7079566 Kido et al. Jul 2006 B2
7099533 Chenard Aug 2006 B1
7099535 Bhagavatula et al. Aug 2006 B2
7116887 Farroni et al. Oct 2006 B2
7146073 Wan Dec 2006 B2
7148447 Ehrmann et al. Dec 2006 B2
7151787 Kulp et al. Dec 2006 B2
7151788 Imakado et al. Dec 2006 B2
7157661 Amako Jan 2007 B2
7170913 Araujo et al. Jan 2007 B2
7174078 Libori et al. Feb 2007 B2
7184630 Kwon et al. Feb 2007 B2
7193771 Smith et al. Mar 2007 B1
7196339 Namba et al. Mar 2007 B2
7218440 Green May 2007 B2
7231063 Naimark Jun 2007 B2
7235150 Bischel et al. Jun 2007 B2
7257293 Fini et al. Aug 2007 B1
7317857 Manyam et al. Jan 2008 B2
7318450 Nobili Jan 2008 B2
7349123 Clarke et al. Mar 2008 B2
7359604 Po Apr 2008 B2
7373070 Wetter et al. May 2008 B2
7382389 Cordingley et al. Jun 2008 B2
7394476 Cordingley et al. Jul 2008 B2
7421175 Varnham Sep 2008 B2
7463805 Li et al. Dec 2008 B2
7526166 Bookbinder et al. Apr 2009 B2
7527977 Fruetel et al. May 2009 B1
7537395 Savage-Leuchs May 2009 B2
7592568 Varnham et al. Sep 2009 B2
7593435 Gapontsev et al. Sep 2009 B2
7622710 Gluckstad Nov 2009 B2
7628865 Singh Dec 2009 B2
7748913 Oba Jul 2010 B2
7764854 Fini Jul 2010 B2
7781778 Moon et al. Aug 2010 B2
7783149 Fini Aug 2010 B2
7835608 Minelly et al. Nov 2010 B2
7839901 Meleshkevich et al. Nov 2010 B2
7876495 Minelly Jan 2011 B1
7880961 Feve et al. Feb 2011 B1
7920767 Fini Apr 2011 B2
7924500 Minelly Apr 2011 B1
7925125 Cyr et al. Apr 2011 B2
7955905 Cordingley et al. Jun 2011 B2
7955906 Cordingley et al. Jun 2011 B2
8027555 Kliner et al. Sep 2011 B1
8071912 Costin, Sr. et al. Dec 2011 B2
8184363 Rothenberg May 2012 B2
8217304 Cordingley et al. Jul 2012 B2
8237788 Cooper et al. Aug 2012 B2
8243764 Tucker et al. Aug 2012 B2
8251475 Murray et al. Aug 2012 B2
8269108 Kunishi et al. Sep 2012 B2
8270441 Rogers et al. Sep 2012 B2
8270445 Morasse et al. Sep 2012 B2
8278591 Chouf et al. Oct 2012 B2
8288679 Unrath Oct 2012 B2
8288683 Jennings et al. Oct 2012 B2
8310009 Saran et al. Nov 2012 B2
8317413 Fisher et al. Nov 2012 B2
8362391 Partlo et al. Jan 2013 B2
8395084 Tanaka Mar 2013 B2
8404998 Unrath et al. Mar 2013 B2
8411710 Tamaoki Apr 2013 B2
8414264 Bolms et al. Apr 2013 B2
8415613 Heyn et al. Apr 2013 B2
8433161 Langseth et al. Apr 2013 B2
8442303 Cheng et al. May 2013 B2
8472099 Fujino et al. Jun 2013 B2
8509577 Liu Aug 2013 B2
8526110 Honea et al. Sep 2013 B1
8537871 Saracco Sep 2013 B2
8542145 Galati Sep 2013 B2
8542971 Chatigny Sep 2013 B2
8593725 Kliner et al. Nov 2013 B2
8711471 Liu et al. Apr 2014 B2
8728591 Inada et al. May 2014 B2
8755649 Yilmaz et al. Jun 2014 B2
8755660 Minelly Jun 2014 B1
8774237 Maryashin et al. Jul 2014 B2
8781269 Huber et al. Jul 2014 B2
8809734 Cordingley et al. Aug 2014 B2
8835804 Farmer et al. Sep 2014 B2
8861910 Yun Oct 2014 B2
8873134 Price et al. Oct 2014 B2
8934742 Voss et al. Jan 2015 B2
8947768 Kliner et al. Feb 2015 B2
8948218 Gapontsev et al. Feb 2015 B2
8953914 Genier Feb 2015 B2
9014220 Minelly et al. Apr 2015 B2
9136663 Taya Sep 2015 B2
9140873 Minelly Sep 2015 B2
9158066 Fini et al. Oct 2015 B2
9170359 Van Bommel et al. Oct 2015 B2
9170367 Messerly Oct 2015 B2
9200887 Potsaid et al. Dec 2015 B2
9207395 Fini et al. Dec 2015 B2
9217825 Ye et al. Dec 2015 B2
9250390 Muendel et al. Feb 2016 B2
9310560 Chann et al. Apr 2016 B2
9322989 Fini et al. Apr 2016 B2
9325151 Fini et al. Apr 2016 B1
9339890 Woods et al. May 2016 B2
9366887 Tayebati et al. Jun 2016 B2
9397466 McComb et al. Jul 2016 B2
9431786 Savage-Leuchs Aug 2016 B2
9442252 Genier Sep 2016 B2
9482821 Huber et al. Nov 2016 B2
9496683 Kanskar Nov 2016 B1
9507084 Fini et al. Nov 2016 B2
9537042 Dittli et al. Jan 2017 B2
9547121 Hou et al. Jan 2017 B2
9634462 Kliner et al. Apr 2017 B2
9823422 Muendel et al. Nov 2017 B2
9837783 Kliner et al. Dec 2017 B2
10295845 Kliner et al. May 2019 B2
10310201 Kliner Jun 2019 B2
10423015 Kliner et al. Sep 2019 B2
20020097963 Ukechi et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020146202 Reed et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020147394 Ellingsen Oct 2002 A1
20020158052 Ehrmann et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020159685 Cormack Oct 2002 A1
20020168139 Clarkson et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020176676 Johnson et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020181512 Wang et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030031407 Weisberg et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030032204 Walt et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030043384 Hill Mar 2003 A1
20030059184 Tankala et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030095578 Kopp et al. May 2003 A1
20030118305 Reed et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030152342 Wang et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030174387 Eggleton et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030213998 Hsu et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030219208 Kwon et al. Nov 2003 A1
20040013379 Johnson et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040031779 Cahill et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040086245 Farroni et al. May 2004 A1
20040112634 Tanaka et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040126059 Bhagavatula et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040207936 Yamamoto et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040208464 Po Oct 2004 A1
20050002607 Neuhaus et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050017156 Ehrmann Jan 2005 A1
20050027288 Oyagi et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050041697 Seifert et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050168847 Sasaki Aug 2005 A1
20050185892 Kwon et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050191017 Croteau et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050233557 Tanaka et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050259944 Anderson et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050265678 Manyam et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050271340 Weisberg et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060024001 Kobayashi Feb 2006 A1
20060054606 Amako Mar 2006 A1
20060067632 Broeng et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060219673 Varnham et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060275705 Dorogy et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060291788 Po Dec 2006 A1
20070026676 Li et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070041083 Di Teodoro et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070047066 Green Mar 2007 A1
20070047940 Matsumoto Mar 2007 A1
20070075060 Shedlov et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070104436 Li et al. May 2007 A1
20070104438 Varnham May 2007 A1
20070147751 Fini Jun 2007 A1
20070178674 Imai et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070195850 Schluter et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070215820 Cordingley et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070251543 Singh Nov 2007 A1
20080037604 Savage-Leuchs Feb 2008 A1
20080124022 Ivtsenkov May 2008 A1
20080141724 Fuflyigin Jun 2008 A1
20080154249 Cao Jun 2008 A1
20080181567 Bookbinder et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080231939 Gluckstad Sep 2008 A1
20080246024 Touwslager et al. Oct 2008 A1
20090034059 Fini Feb 2009 A1
20090052849 Lee et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090059353 Fini Mar 2009 A1
20090080472 Yao et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090080835 Frith Mar 2009 A1
20090122377 Wagner May 2009 A1
20090127477 Tanaka et al. May 2009 A1
20090129237 Chen et al. May 2009 A1
20090152247 Jennings et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090154512 Simons et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090175301 Li et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090257621 Silver Oct 2009 A1
20090274833 Li Nov 2009 A1
20090297108 Ushiwata et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090297140 Heismann et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090314752 Manens et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090324233 Samartsev et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100025387 Arai et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100067013 Howieson et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100067555 Austin et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100067860 Ikeda et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100116794 Taido et al. May 2010 A1
20100129029 Westbrook May 2010 A1
20100150186 Mizuuchi Jun 2010 A1
20100163537 Furuta et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100187409 Cristiani et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100225974 Sandstrom Sep 2010 A1
20100230665 Verschuren et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100251437 Heyn et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100252543 Manens et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100257641 Perkins et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100303419 Benjamin et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110032602 Rothenberg Feb 2011 A1
20110058250 Liu et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110080476 Dinauer et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110091155 Yilmaz et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110127697 Milne Jun 2011 A1
20110133365 Ushimaru et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110163077 Partlo et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110187025 Costin, Sr. Aug 2011 A1
20110243161 Tucker et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110248005 Briand et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110278277 Stork Genannt Wersborg Nov 2011 A1
20110279826 Miura et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110297229 Gu et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110305249 Gapontsev et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110305256 Chann Dec 2011 A1
20110316029 Maruyama et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120002919 Liu Jan 2012 A1
20120009511 Dimitriev Jan 2012 A1
20120051084 Yalin et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120051692 Seo Mar 2012 A1
20120082410 Peng et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120093461 Ramachandran Apr 2012 A1
20120127097 Gaynor et al. May 2012 A1
20120127563 Farmer et al. May 2012 A1
20120128294 Voss et al. May 2012 A1
20120145685 Ream et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120148823 Chu Jun 2012 A1
20120156458 Chu Jun 2012 A1
20120168411 Farmer et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120219026 Saracco et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120262781 Price et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120267345 Clark Oct 2012 A1
20120295071 Sato Nov 2012 A1
20120301733 Eckert et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120301737 Labelle et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120321262 Goell et al. Dec 2012 A1
20120329974 Inada et al. Dec 2012 A1
20130005139 Krasnov et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130022754 Bennett et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130023086 Chikama et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130027648 Moriwaki Jan 2013 A1
20130028276 Minelly et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130038923 Jespersen et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130087694 Creeden et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130095260 Bovatsek et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130134637 Wiesner et al. May 2013 A1
20130014925 Muendel et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130146569 Woods et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130148925 Muendel et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130182725 Karlsen et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130186871 Suzuki Jul 2013 A1
20130202264 Messerly Aug 2013 A1
20130223792 Huber et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130228442 Mohaptatra et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130251324 Fini et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130272657 Salokatve Oct 2013 A1
20130299468 Unrath et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130301300 Duerksen et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130308661 Nishimura et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130343703 Genier Dec 2013 A1
20140044143 Clarkson et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140086526 Starodubov et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140104618 Potsaid et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140155873 Bor Jun 2014 A1
20140177038 Rrataj et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140178023 Oh et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140205236 Noguchi et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140233900 Hugonnot et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140241385 Fomin et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140259589 Xu et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140263209 Burris et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140268310 Ye et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140271328 Burris Sep 2014 A1
20140313513 Liao Oct 2014 A1
20140319381 Gross Oct 2014 A1
20140332254 Pellerite et al. Nov 2014 A1
20140333931 Lu et al. Nov 2014 A1
20140334788 Fini et al. Nov 2014 A1
20150049987 Grasso et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150096963 Bruck Apr 2015 A1
20150104139 Brunet et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150125114 Genier May 2015 A1
20150125115 Genier May 2015 A1
20150138630 Honea et al. May 2015 A1
20150165556 Jones et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150217402 Hesse et al. Aug 2015 A1
20150241632 Chann et al. Aug 2015 A1
20150270089 Ghanea-Hercock Sep 2015 A1
20150283613 Backlund et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150293300 Fini et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150293306 Huber et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150314612 Balasini et al. Nov 2015 A1
20150316716 Fini et al. Nov 2015 A1
20150325977 Gu Nov 2015 A1
20150331205 Tayebati et al. Nov 2015 A1
20150349481 Kliner Dec 2015 A1
20150352664 Errico et al. Dec 2015 A1
20150372445 Harter Dec 2015 A1
20150378184 Tayebati et al. Dec 2015 A1
20160013607 McComb et al. Jan 2016 A1
20160052162 Colin Feb 2016 A1
20160059354 Sercel Mar 2016 A1
20160097903 Li et al. Apr 2016 A1
20160104995 Savage-Leuchs Apr 2016 A1
20160114431 Cheverton et al. Apr 2016 A1
20160116679 Muendel et al. Apr 2016 A1
20160158889 Carter et al. Jun 2016 A1
20160187646 Ehrmann Jun 2016 A1
20160207111 Robrecht et al. Jul 2016 A1
20160218476 Kliner et al. Jul 2016 A1
20160285227 Farrow et al. Sep 2016 A1
20160294150 Johnson Oct 2016 A1
20160320565 Brown et al. Nov 2016 A1
20160320685 Tayebati et al. Nov 2016 A1
20160369332 Rothberg Dec 2016 A1
20170003461 Tayebati et al. Jan 2017 A1
20170090119 Logan et al. Mar 2017 A1
20170110845 Hou et al. Apr 2017 A1
20170120537 DeMuth et al. May 2017 A1
20170162999 Saracco et al. Jun 2017 A1
20170271837 Hemenway et al. Sep 2017 A1
20170293084 Zhou et al. Oct 2017 A1
20170336580 Tayebati et al. Nov 2017 A1
20170363810 Holland et al. Dec 2017 A1
20180059343 Kliner Mar 2018 A1
20180088357 Kliner et al. Mar 2018 A1
20180088358 Kliner et al. Mar 2018 A1
20180203185 Farrow et al. Jul 2018 A1
20190025809 Kliner Aug 2019 A1
20190250398 Small Aug 2019 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (111)
Number Date Country
12235 Aug 2009 BY
2637535 Aug 2007 CA
1212056 Mar 1999 CN
1584644 Feb 2005 CN
1617003 May 2005 CN
1217030 Aug 2005 CN
1926460 Aug 2005 CN
1966224 May 2007 CN
1327254 Jul 2007 CN
101143405 Mar 2008 CN
101303269 Nov 2008 CN
101314196 Dec 2008 CN
101435918 May 2009 CN
101733561 Jun 2010 CN
101836309 Sep 2010 CN
102007653 Apr 2011 CN
201783759 Apr 2011 CN
102176104 Sep 2011 CN
102441740 May 2012 CN
102448623 May 2012 CN
102481664 May 2012 CN
101907742 Jul 2012 CN
102549377 Jul 2012 CN
102782540 Nov 2012 CN
102844942 Dec 2012 CN
103056513 Apr 2013 CN
103097931 May 2013 CN
103173760 Jun 2013 CN
103490273 Jan 2014 CN
103521920 Jan 2014 CN
103606803 Feb 2014 CN
103999302 Aug 2014 CN
104136952 Nov 2014 CN
104169763 Nov 2014 CN
104999670 Oct 2015 CN
105383060 Mar 2016 CN
102582274 Jul 2019 CN
3833992 Apr 1990 DE
4200587 Apr 1993 DE
4437284 Apr 1996 DE
203 20 269 Apr 2004 DE
10321102 Dec 2004 DE
60312826 Jan 2008 DE
102009026526 Dec 2010 DE
102013205029 Sep 2014 DE
102013215362 Sep 2014 DE
102013017792 Apr 2015 DE
202016004237 Aug 2016 DE
102015103127 Sep 2016 DE
0366856 May 1990 EP
1238745 Sep 2002 EP
1681542 Jul 2006 EP
1800700 Jun 2007 EP
374848 Oct 2008 EP
1266259 May 2011 EP
2587564 May 2013 EP
2642246 Sep 2013 EP
2886226 Jun 2015 EP
H02220314 Sep 1990 JP
H06-297168 Oct 1994 JP
H11780 Jan 1999 JP
H11-287922 Oct 1999 JP
H11-344636 Dec 1999 JP
2003-129862 May 2003 JP
200320286 Jul 2003 JP
2003200286 Jul 2003 JP
2004291031 Oct 2004 JP
2005070608 Mar 2005 JP
2006-45584 Feb 2006 JP
2006-098085 Apr 2006 JP
2006-106227 Apr 2006 JP
2008-281395 Nov 2008 JP
2009-142866 Jul 2009 JP
2009-248157 Oct 2009 JP
2012-059920 Mar 2012 JP
2012-528011 Nov 2012 JP
2016201558 Dec 2016 JP
10-2011-0109957 Oct 2011 KR
2008742 Feb 1994 RU
68715 Nov 2007 RU
2365476 Aug 2009 RU
2528287 Sep 2014 RU
2015112812 Oct 2016 RU
200633062 Sep 2006 TW
200707466 Feb 2007 TW
201307949 Feb 2013 TW
1995011100 Apr 1995 WO
1995011101 Apr 1995 WO
2003044914 May 2003 WO
2004027477 Apr 2004 WO
WO 2004027477 Apr 2004 WO
WO 2008053915 May 2008 WO
2009155536 Dec 2009 WO
2010029243 Mar 2010 WO
2011124671 Oct 2011 WO
WO 2011124671 Oct 2011 WO
2011046407 Nov 2011 WO
2012165389 May 2012 WO
2012102655 Aug 2012 WO
2013090236 Jun 2013 WO
WO 2013090236 Jun 2013 WO
2014074947 May 2014 WO
WO 2014154901 Oct 2014 WO
2014179345 Nov 2014 WO
2014180870 Nov 2014 WO
2015156281 Oct 2015 WO
2015189883 Dec 2015 WO
2016061657 Apr 2016 WO
2017008022 Jan 2017 WO
WO 2017008022 Jan 2017 WO
2017136831 Aug 2017 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (370)
Entry
“Canunda, Application Note,” CAlLabs, available at: www.cailabs.com, 16 pages (Jun. 10, 2015).
“Canunda, Application Note: Flexible high-power laser beam shaping,” CAlLabs, available at: www.cailabs.com, 22 pages, date unknown (in a related U.S. Appl. No. 15/607,399).
First Office Action for related Chinese Application No. 201610051671.X, dated Jun. 4, 2018, 25 pages (w/ English translation).
Fuse, “Beam Shaping for Advanced Laser Materials Processing,” Laser Technik Journal, pp. 19-22 (Feb. 2015).
Garcia et al., “Fast adaptive laser shaping based on multiple laser incoherent combining,” Proc. of SPIE, 10097:1009705-1-1009705-15 (Feb. 22, 2017).
Huang et al., “All-fiber mode-group-selective photonic lantern using graded-index multimode fibers,” Optics Express, 23:224-234 (Jan. 6, 2015).
International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Application No. PCT/US2018/024908, dated Jul. 19, 2018, 8 pages.
Jain et al., “Multi-element fiber technology for space-division multiplexing applications,” Optics Express, 22:3787-3796 (Feb. 11, 2014).
Jin et al., “Mode Coupling Effects in Ring-Core Fibers for Space-Division Multiplexing Systems,” Journal of Lightwave Technology, 34:3365-3372 (Jul. 15, 2016).
Newkirk et al., “Bending sensor combining multicore fiber with a mide-selective photonic lantern,” Optics Letters, 40:5188-5191 (Nov. 15, 2015).
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 15/607,411, dated Jun. 12, 2018, 19 pages.
SeGall et al., “Simultaneous laser mode conversion and beam combining using multiplexed volume phase elements,” Advanced Solid-State Lasers Congress Technical Digest, Optical Society of America, paper AW2A.9, 3 pages (Oct. 27-Nov. 1, 2013).
Argyros et al., “Bend loss in highly multimode fibres,” Optics Express, 16:18590-18598 (Nov. 10, 2008).
Andreasch et al., “Two concentric fiber diameters in one laser light cable,” Optical Components, No. 1, pp. 38-41 (Jan. 2011).
Bai et al., “Effect of Bimodal Powder Mixture on Powder Packing Density and Sintered Density in Binder Jetting of Metals,” 26th Annual International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, 14 pages (Aug. 10-12, 2015).
Balazic, “Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing LENS Technology,” Additive Manufacturing of Metal Components Conference at IK4-Lortek, 52 pages (Nov. 27, 2013).
“Bending Machine,” CBC Alta Technologia Italiana, General Catalog, pp. 96-97 (2011).
Brown et al., “Fundamentals of Laser-Material Interaction and Application to Multiscale Surface Modification,” Chapter 4, Laser Precision Microfabrication, pp. 91-120 (2010).
Duflou et al., “Development of a Real Time Monitoring and Adaptive Control System for Laser Flame Cutting,” ICALEO 2009, 527, 10 pages published online Sep. 27, 2018.
“Enhanced LENS Thermal Imaging Capabilities Introduced by Optomec,” OPTOMEC, 4 pages (Jan. 8, 2013).
Extended European Search Report for related Application No. 18173438.5, 11 pages, dated Oct. 15, 2018.
Extended European Search Report for related Application No. 16849882.2, 8 pages, dated Apr. 23, 2019.
Fini, “Bend distortion in large-mode-area amplifier fiber design,” Proc. of SPIE, 6781:67810E-1-67810E-11 (Nov. 21, 2007).
Heider et al., “Process Stabilization at welding Copper by Laser Power Modulation,” Physics Procedia, 12:81-87 (2011).
International Preliminary Report on Patentability from International Application No. PCT/US2017/034848, dated Apr. 2, 2019, 9 pages.
Ivanov et al., “Fiber-Optic Bend Sensor Based on Double Cladding Fiber,” Journal of Sensors, 2015, 6 pages (2015).
Ivanov et al., “Fiber structure based on a depressed inner cladding fiber for bend, refractive index and temperature sensing,” Meas. Sci. Technol., 25:1-8 (2014).
Jacobs, “Suggested Guidelines for the Handling of Optical Fiber,” White Paper, Corning Incorporated, pp. 1-8 (Dec. 2001).
Jollivet, “Specialty Fiber Lasers and Novel Fiber Devices,” Doctoral Dissertation, University of Central Florida, 213 pages (2014).
Jollivet et al., “Advances in Multi-Core Fiber Lasers,” Latin America Optics and Photonics Conference, OSA Technical, 4 pages (Nov. 2014).
Khairallah et al, “Laser power-bed fusion additive manufacturing: Effects of main physical processes on dynamical melt flow and pore formation from mesoscopic powder simulation,” Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, 26 pages (Aug. 20, 2015).
Martins et al., “Modeling of Bend Losses in Single-Mode Optical Fibers,” 7th Conference on Telecommunications, 4 pages (Jan. 2009).
Messerly et al., “Field-flattened, ring-like propagation modes,” Optics Express, 21:12683-12698 (May 16, 2013).
Messerly et al., “Patterned flattened modes,” Optics Letters, 38:3329-3332 (Sep. 1, 2013).
Neilson et al., “Free-space optical relay for the interconnection of multimode fibers,” Applied Optics, 38:2291-2296 (Apr. 10, 1999).
Neilson et al., “Plastic modules for free-space optical interconnects,” Applied Optics, 37:2944-2952 (May 10, 1998).
Saint-Pierre et al., “Fast uniform micro structuring of DLC surfaces using multiple ultrashort laser spots through spatial beam shaping,” Physics Procedia, 83:1178-1183 (2016).
Salceda-Delgado et al., “Compact fiber-optic curvature sensor based on super-mode interference in a seven-core fiber,” Optics Letters, 40:1468-1471 (Apr. 1, 2015).
Sateesh et al., “Effect of Process Parameters on Surface Roughness of Laser Processed Inconel Superalloy,” International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, 5:232-236 (Aug. 2014).
Shusteff et al., “One-step volumetric additive manufacturing of complex polymer structures,” Sci. Adv., 3:1-7 (Dec. 8, 2017).
Rosales-Guzman et al., “Multiplexing 200 modes on a single digital hologram,” available at: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1706.06129v1, pp. 1-14 (Jun. 19, 2017).
“UNI 42 A,” Curvatubi elettrica digitale, 5 pages (2016).
“UNI 60 COMBI 2,” Frame-Grab of YouTube Video, 1 page (Sep. 26, 2011).
Villatoro et al., “Ultrasensitive vector bending sensor based on multicore optical fiber,” Optics Letters, 41:832-835 (Feb. 15, 2016).
Wang et al., “Mechanisms and characteristics of spatter generation in SLM processing and its effect on the properties,” Materials & Design, 117(5):121-130 (Mar. 5, 2017).
Zhang et al., “Switchable multiwavelength fiber laser by using a compact in-fiber Mach-Zehnder interferometer,” J. Opt., 14:1-5 (2012).
Zlodeev et al., “Transmission spectra of a double-clad fibre structure under bending,” Quantum Electronics, 48:535-541 (2013).
Goppold, et al., “Dynamic Beam Shaping Improves Laser Cutting of Thick Steel Plates,” Industrial Photonics vol. 4, Issue 3, Jul. 2017, pp. 18-19.
Business Unit Laser Ablation and Cutting “Laser Beam Fusion Cutting with Dynamic Beam Shaping,” Fraunhofer IWS Annual Report 2015, 2 pages.
Herwig, et al. “Possibilities of Power Modulation and Dynamic Beam Shaping”, Fraunhofer IWS presentation, retrieved on Mar. 16, 2018, 6 pages.
Nazemosadat E. et al.; Saturable Absorption in Multicore Fiber Couplers; Dept of EE and Computer Science, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee; Opt. Soc, AmB, N. 11, Nov. 2013.
Dorrington et al.; “A Simple Microcontroller Based Digital Lock-In Amplifier for the Detection of Low Level Optical Signals”: Proceedings of the First IEEE International Workshop on Electronic Design, Test and Applications; (Delta 01) Year 2002.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2018/024959, dated Jun. 28, 2018, 7 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2018/024976, dated Aug. 9, 2018, 8 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2018/024889, dated Jul. 28, 2018, 5 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2018/024641, dated Jul. 12, 2018, 6 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2018/023012, dated Jul. 23, 2018, 6 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2018/023009, dated Jul. 18, 2018, 8 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2018/016305, dated Jun. 11, 2018, 10 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2018/016288, dated Jun. 11, 2018, 10 pages.
Alcock et al., Element Table, Canadian Metallurgical Quarterly, 23:309-311 (1984).
Affine Transformation—from Wolfram MathWorld, http://mathworld.wolfram.com/AffineTransformation.html, downloaded Feb. 21, 2014, 2 pages.
AlMangour et al., “Scanning strategies for texture and anisotropy tailoring during selective laser melting of TiC/316L stainless steel nanocomposites,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 728:424-435 (Aug. 5, 2017).
Anastasiadi et al., “Fabrication and characterization of machined multi-core fiber tweezers for single cell manipulation,” Optics Express, 26:3557-3567 (Feb. 5, 2018).
Ayoola, “Study of Fundamental Laser Material Interaction Parameters in Solid and Powder Melting,” Ph.D. Thesis, Cranfield University, 192 pages (May 2016).
Barron et al., “Dual-beam interference from a lensed multicore fiber and its application to optical trapping,” Optics Express, 20:23156-23161 (Oct. 8, 2012).
Barron et al., “Optical Trapping using a Lensed Multicore Fiber,” Workshop on Specialty Optical Fibers and their Applications, OSA 2013, 2 pages (2013).
Bergmann et al., “Effects of diode laser superposition on pulsed laser welding of aluminum,” Physics Procedia, 41:180-189 (2013).
Bertoli et al., “On the limitations of Volumetric Energy Density as a design parameter for Selective Laser Melting,” Materials and Design, 113:331-340 (Oct. 19, 2016).
Birks et al., “The photonic lantern,” Advances in Optics and Photonics, 7:107-167 (2015).
Burger et al., “Implementation of a spatial light modulator for intracavity beam shaping,” J. Opt., 17:1-7, (2015).
“Canunda, Application Note,” CAILabs, available at: www.cailabs.com, 16 pages (Jun. 10, 2015).
“Canunda, Application Note: Flexible high-power laser beam shaping,” CAILabs, available at: www.cailabs.com, 22 pages, date unknown (in a related U.S. Appl. No. 15/607,399).
Caprio, “Investigation of emission modes in the SLM of AISI 316L: modelling and process diagnosis,” Ph.D. Thesis, Polytechnic University of Milan, 3 pages (Apr. 28, 2017).—Abstract only.
Chen et al., “An Algorithm for correction of Distortion of Laser marking Systems,” IEEE International Conference on Control and Automation, Guangzhou, China, 5 pages (May 30-Jun. 1, 2007).
Chen et al., “Improving additive manufacturing processability of hard-to-process overhanging structure by selective laser melting,” Journal of Materials Processing Tech., 250:99-108 (Jul. 1, 2017).
Chung, “Solution-Processed Flexible Transparent Conductors Composed of Silver Nanowire Networks Embedded in Indium Tin Oxide Nanoparticle Matrices,” Nano Research, 10 pages (Sep. 24, 2012).
Cloots et al., “Investigations on the microstructure and crack formation of IN738LC samples processed by selective laser melting using Gaussian and doughnut profiles,” Materials and Design, 89:770-784 (2016).
Cui, et al., “Calibration of a laser galvanometric scanning system by adapting a camera model,” Applied Optics 48(14):2632-2637 (Jun. 2009).
DebRoy et al., “Additive manufacturing of metallic components—Process, structure and properties,” Progress in Materials Science, 92:112-224 (2018).
Decombe et al., “Single and dual fiber nano-tip optical tweezers: trapping and analysis,” Optics Express, 21:30521-30531 (Dec. 4, 2013).
Dehoff et al., “Site specific control of crystallographic grain orientation through electron beam additive manufacturing,” Materials Science and Technology, 31:931-938 (2015).
Demir et al., “From pulsed to continuous wave emission in SLM with contemporary fiber laser sources: effect of temporal and spatial pulse overlap in part quality,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 91:2701-2714 (Jan. 10, 2017).
Deng et al., “Annular arrayed-waveguide fiber for autofocusing Airy-like beams,” Optics Letters, 41:824-827 (Feb. 15, 2016).
Dezfoli et al., “Determination and controlling of grain structure of metals after laser incidence: Theoretical approach,” Scientific Reports, 7:1-11 (Jan. 30, 2017).
Drobczynski et al., “Real-time force measurement in double wavelength optical tweezers,” Journal of the Optical Society of America B, 34:38-43 (Jan. 2017).
Duocastella et al., “Bessel and annular beams for materials processing,” Laser Photonics Rev. 6, pp. 607-621 (2012).
Faidel et al., “Improvement of selective laser melting by beam shaping and minimized thermally induced effects in optical systems,” 9th International Conference on Photonic Technologies LANE 2016, pp. 1-4 (2016).
Farley et al., “Optical fiber designs for beam shaping,” Proc. of SPIE, Fiber Lasers XI: Technology, Systems, and Applications, 8961:89612U-1-89612U-10 (2014).
Fey, “3D Printing and International Security,” PRIF Report No. 144, 47 pages (2017).
Francis, “The Effects of Laser and Electron Beam Spot Size in Additive Manufacturing Processes,” Ph.D. Thesis, Carnegie Mellon University, 191 pages (May 2017).
Fuchs et al., “Beam shaping concepts with aspheric surfaces,” Proc. of SPIE, 9581:95810L-1-95810L-7 (Aug. 25, 2015).
Gardner, “Precision Photolithography on Flexible Substrates,” http://azorescorp.com/downloads/Articles/AZORESFlexSubstrate.pdf (prior to Jan. 30, 2013).
Ghouse et al., “The influence of laser parameters and scanning strategies on the mechanical properties of a stochastic porous material,” Materials and Design, 131:498-508 (2017).
Giannini et al., “Anticipating, measuring, and minimizing MEMS mirror scan error to improve laser scanning microscopy's speed and accuracy,” PLOS ONE, 14 pages (Oct. 3, 2017).
Gissibl et al., “Sub-micrometre accurate free-form optics by three-dimensional printing on single-mode fibres,” Nature Communications, 7:1-9 (Jun. 24, 2016).
Gockel et al., “Integrated melt pool and microstructure control for Ti-6Al-4V thin wall additive manufacturing,” Materials Science and Technology, 31:912-916 (Nov. 3, 2014).
Grigoriyants et al., “Tekhnologicheskie protsessy lazernoy obrabotki,” Moscow, izdatelstvo MGTU im. N.E. Baumana, p. 334 (2006).
Gris-Sanchez et al., “The Airy fiber: an optical fiber that guides light diffracted by a circular aperture,” Optica, 3:270-276 (Mar. 2016).
Gunenthiram et al., “Analysis of laser-melt pool-powder bed interaction during the selective laser melting of a stainless steel,” Journal of Laser Applications, 29:022303-1-022303-8 (May 2017).
Gupta, “A Review on Layer Formation Studies in Selective Laser Melting of Steel Powders and Thin Wall Parts Using Pulse Shaping,” International Journal of Manufacturing and Material Processing, 3:9-15 (2017).
Hafner et al., “Tailored laser beam shaping for efficient and accurate microstructuring,” Applied Physics A, 124:111-1-111-9 (Jan. 10, 2018).
Han et al., “Selective laser melting of advanced Al-Al2O3, nanocomposites: Simulation, microstructure and mechanical properties,” Materials Science & Engineering A, 698:162-173, (May 17, 2017).
Hansen et al., “Beam shaping to control of weldpool size in width and depth,” Physics Procedia, 56:467-476 (2014).
Hauschild, “Application Specific Beam Profiles—New Surface and Thin-Film Refinement Processes using Beam Shaping Technologies,” Proc. of SPIE, 10085:100850J-1-100850J-9 (Feb. 22, 2017).
Hebert, “Viewpoint: metallurgical aspects of powder bed metal additive manufacturing,” J. Mater. Sci., 51:1165-1175 (Nov. 18, 2015).
Heck, “Highly integrated optical phased arrays: photonic integrated circuits for optical beam shaping and beam steering,” Nanophotonics, 6:93-107 (2017).
Huang et al., “3D printing optical engine for controlling material microstructure,” Physics Procedia, 83:847-853 (2016).
Java—Transform a triangle to another triangle—Stack Overflow, http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1114257/transform-a-triangle-to-another-triangle?lq=1, downloaded Feb. 21, 2014, 3 pages.
Ji et al., “Meta-q-plate for complex beam shaping,” Scientific Reports, 6:1-7 (May 6, 2016).
Kaden et al., “Selective laser melting of copper using ultrashort laser pulses,” Lasers in Manufacturing Conference 2017, pp. 1-5 (2017).
Kaden et al., “Selective laser melting of copper using ultrashort laser pulses,” Applied Physics A, 123:596-1-596-6 (Aug. 24, 2017).
Keicher et al., “Advanced 3D Printing of Metals and Electronics using Computational Fluid Dynamics,” Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, 32 pages (Aug. 2015).
Khijwania et al., “Propagation characteristics of single-mode graded-index elliptical core linear and nonlinear fiber using super-Gaussian approximation,” Applied Optics, 48:G156-G162 (Nov. 1, 2009).
King et al., “Observation of keyhole-mode laser melting in laser powder-bed fusion additive manufacturing,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 214:2915-2925 (2014).
Klerks et al., “Flexible beam shaping system for the next generation of process development in laser micromachining,” 9th International Conference on Photonic Technologies LANE 2016, pp. 1-8 (2016).
Kosolapov et al., “Hollow-core revolver fibre with a double-capillary reflective cladding,” Quantum Electronics, 46:267-270 (2016).
Krupa et al., “Spatial beam self-cleaning in multimode fiber,” available at: https://arxiv.org/abs/1603.0272v1, 8 pages (Mar. 9, 2016).
Kruth et al., “On-line monitoring and process control in selective laser melting and laser cutting,” Proceedings of the 5th Lane Conference, laser Assisted Net Shape Engineering, vol. 1, 14 pages, (Sep. 1, 2007).
Kummer et al., “Method to quantify accuracy of position feedback signals of a three-dimensional two-photon laser-scanning microscope,” Biomedical Optics Express, 6(10):3678-3693 (Sep. 1, 2015).
Laskin et al., “Applying of refractive spatial beam shapers with scanning optics,” ICALEO, Paper M604, pp. 941-947 (2011).
Laskin et al., “Beam shaping to generate uniform “Laser Light Sheet” and Linear Laser Spots,” Proc. of SPIE, The International Society for Optical Engineering, 13 pages (Sep. 2013).
Lee et al., “FEM Simulations to Study the Effects of Laser Power and Scan Speed on Molten Pool Size in Additive Manufacturing,” International Journal of Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering, 11:1291-1295 (2017).
Lee et al., “Use of the Coaxial-Core Profile in the Erbium-Doped Fiber Amplifier for Self-Regulation of Gain Spectrum,” IEICE Trans. Commun., E82-B:1273-1282 (Aug. 1999).
Li et al., “High-quality near-field beam achieved in a high-power laser based on SLM adaptive beam-shaping system,” Optics Express, 23:681-689 (Jan. 12, 2015).
Li et al., “Melt-pool motion, temperature variation and dendritic morphology of Inconel 718 during pulsed-and continuous-wave laser additive manufacturing: A comparative study,” Materials and Design, 119:351-360 (Jan. 23, 2017).
Litvin et al., “Beam shaping laser with controllable gain,” Appl. Phys. B, 123:174-1-174-5 (May 24, 2017).
Liu et al., “Femtosecond laser additive manufacturing of YSZ,” Appl. Phys. A, 123:293-1-293-8 (Apr. 1, 2017).
Ludtke, et al., “Calibration of Galvanometric Laser Scanners Using Statistical Learning Methods,” Bildverabeitung fur die Medizin, pp. 467-472 (Feb. 25, 2015).
Malinauskas et al., “Ultrafast laser processing of materials: from science to industry,” Official Journal of the CIOMP, Light: Science & Applications, 5:1-14 (2016).
Manakov, et al., “A Mathematical Model and Calibration Procedure for Galvanometric Laser Scanning Systems,” Vision, Modeling, and Visualization, 8 pages (Jan. 2011).
Masoomi et al., “Quality part production via multi-laser additive manufacturing,” Manufacturing Letters, 13:15-20 (May 27, 2017).
Matthews et al., “Diode-based additive manufacturing of metals using an optically-addressable light valve,” Optics Express, 25:11788-11800 (May 15, 2017).
Meier et al., “Thermophysical Phenomena in Metal Additive Manufacturing by Selective Laser Melting: Fundamentals, Modeling, Simulation and Experimentation,” available at: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1709.09510v1, pp. 1-59 (Sep. 4, 2017).
Morales-Delgado et al., “Three-dimensional microfabrication through a multimode optical fiber,” available at: http://arxiv.org, 20 pages (2016).
Morales-Delgado et al., “Three-dimensional microfabrication through a multimode optical fiber,” Optics Express, 25:7031-7045 (Mar. 20, 2017).
Mumtaz et al., “Selective Laser Melting of thin wall parts using pulse shaping,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 210:279-287 (2010).
Naidoo et al., “Improving the laser brightness of a commercial laser system,” Proc. of SPIE, 10036:100360V-1-100360V-8 (Feb. 3, 2017).
Ngcobo et al., “A digital laser for on-demand laser modes,” Nature Communications, 4:1-6 (Aug. 2, 2013).
Ngcobo et al., “The digital laser,” available at: http://arxiv.org, pp. 1-9 (2013).
Okunkova et al., “Experimental approbation of selective laser melting of powders by the use of non-Gaussian power density distributions,” Physics Procedia, 56:48-57 (2014). (2017).
Okunkova et al., “Study of laser beam modulation influence on structure of materials produced by additive manufacturing,” Adv. Mater. Lett., 7:111-115 (2016).
Olsen, “Laser metal cutting with tailored beam patterns,” available at: https://www.industrial-lasers.com/articles/print/volume-26/issue-5/features/laser-metal-cutting-with-tailored-beam-patterns.html, 8 pages (Sep. 1, 2011).
“Optical Tweezers & Micromanipulation: Applications Hamamatsu Photonics,” available at: http://www.hamamatsu.com/jp/en/community/lcos/aplications/optical.html, archived: Mar. 27, 2015, 3 pages.
PCI-6110, Multifunction I/O Device, httpl/www.ni.com/en-us-support/model.pci-6110.html, downloaded Dec. 15, 2017, 1 page.
Pinkerton, “Lasers in Additive Manufacturing,” Optics & Laser Technology, 78:25-32 (2016).
Prashanth et al., “Is the energy density a reliable parameter for materials synthesis by selective laser melting?” Mater. Res. Lett., 5:386-390 (2017).
Product Brochure entitled “3-Axis and High Power Scanning” by Cambridge Technology, 4 pages, downloaded Dec. 21, 2013.
Product Brochure supplement entitled “Theory of Operation” by Cambridge Technology, 2 pages, downloaded Dec. 21, 2013.
Purtonen, et al., “Monitoring and Adaptive Control of Laser Processes,” Physics Procedia, Elsevier, Amsterdam, NL, 56(9):1218-1231 (Sep. 9, 2014).
Putsch et al., “Active optical system for advanced 3D surface structuring by laser remelting,” Proc. of SPIE, 9356:93560U-1-93560U-10 (Mar. 9, 2015).
Putsch et al., “Active optical system for laser structuring of 3D surfaces by remelting,” Proc. of SPIE, 8843:88430D-1-88430D-8 (Sep. 28, 2013).
Putsch et al., “Integrated optical design for highly dynamic laser beam shaping with membrane deformable mirrors,” Proc. of SPIE, 10090:1009010-1-1009010-8 (Feb. 20, 2017).
Raghavan et al., “Localized melt-scan strategy for site specific control of grain size and primary dendrite arm spacing in electron beam additive manufacturing,” Acta Materialia, 140:375-387 (Aug. 30, 2017).
Rashid et al., “Effect of scan strategy on density and metallurgical properties of 17-4PH parts printed by Selective Laser Melting (SLM),” Journal of Materials Processing Tech., 249:502-511 (Jun. 19, 2017).
Ren et al., “Resonant coupling in trenched bend-insensitive optical fiber,” Optics Letters, 38:781-783 (Mar. 1, 2013).
Sateesh et al.; Effect of Process Parameters on Surface Rougness of Laser Processed Inconel Superalloy, International Journal of Scientifice and Engineering Research, vol. 5, Issue 8, Aug. 2014.
Sames et al., “The metallurgy and processing science of metal additive manufacturing,” International Materials Reviews, pp. 1-46 (2016).
Schulze et al., “Mode Coupling in Few-Mode Fibers Induced by Mechanical Stress,” Journal of Lightwave Technology, 33:4488-4496 (Nov. 1, 2015).
Skutnik et al., “Optical Fibers for Improved Low Loss Coupling of Optical Components,” Proc. of SPIE, Photon Processing in Microelectronics and Photnics III, 6 pages (Jul. 15, 2004).
Smith et al., “Tailoring the thermal conductivity of the powder bed in Electron Beam Melting (EBM) Additive Manufacturing,” Scientific Reports, 7:1-8 (Sep. 5, 2017).
Spears et al., “In-process sensing in selective laser melting (SLM) additive manufacturing,” Integrating Materials and Manufacturing Innovation, 5:2-25 (2016).
Sundqvist et al., “Analytical heat conduction modelling for shaped laser beams,” Journal of Materials Processing Tech., 247:48-54 (Apr. 18, 2017).
Supplementary European Search Report for Application No. EP 17741945.4, 18 pages, dated Nov. 16, 2018.
Thiel et al., “Reliable Beam Positioning for Metal-based Additive Manufacturing by Means of Focal Shift Reduction,” Lasers in Manufacturing Conference 2015, 8 pages (2015).
Tofail et al., “Additive manufacturing: scientific and technological challenges, market uptake and opportunities,” Materials Today, pp. 1-16 (2017).
Trapp et al., “In situ absorptivity measurements of metallic powders during laser powder-bed fusion additive manufacturing,” Applied Materials Today, 9:341-349 (2017).
Ulmanen, “The Effect of High Power Adjustable Ring Mode Fiber Laser for Material Cutting,” M.S. Thesis, Tampere University of Technology, 114 pages (May 2017).
Van Newkirk et al., “Bending sensor combining multicore fiber with a mode-selective photonic lantern,” Optics Letters, 40:5188-5191 (Nov. 15, 2015).
Valdez et al., “Induced porosity in Super Alloy 718 through the laser additive manufacturing process: Microstructure and mechanical properties,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 725:757-764 (Jul. 22, 2017).
Wang et al., “Selective laser melting of W-Ni-Cu composite powder: Densification, microstructure evolution and nano-crystalline formation,” International Journal of Refractory Metals & Hard Materials, 70:9-18 (Sep. 9, 2017).
Wilson-Heid et al., “Quantitative relationship between anisotropic strain to failure and grain morphology in additively manufactured Ti-6Al-4V,” Materials Science & Engineering A, 706:287-294 (Sep. 6, 2017).
Wischeropp et al., “Simulation of the effect of different laser beam intensity profiles on heat distribution in selective laser melting,” Laser in Manufacturing Conference 2015, 10 pages (2015).
Xiao et al., “Effects of laser modes on Nb segregation and Laves phase formation during laser additive manufacturing of nickel-based superalloy,” Materials Letters, 188:260-262 (Nov. 1, 2016).
Xie et al., “Correction of the image distortion for laser galvanometric scanning system,” Optics & Laser Technology, 37:305-311 (Jun. 2005).
Xu et al, “The Influence of Exposure Time on Energy Consumption and Mechanical Properties of SLM-fabricated Parts,” 2017 Annual International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, 7 pages (2017) Abstract only.
Yan et al., “Formation mechanism and process optimization of nano Al2O3-ZrO2 eutectic ceramic via laser engineered net shaping (LENS),” Ceramics International, 43:1-6 (2017).
Ye et al., “Mold-free fs laser shock micro forming and its plastic deformation mechanism,” Optics and Lasers in Engineering, 67:74-82 (2015).
Yu, “Laser Diode Beam Spatial Combining,” Ph.D. Thesis, Politecnico di Torino, 106 pages (Jun. 6, 2017).
Yusuf et al., “Influence of energy density on metallurgy and properties in metal additive manufacturing,” Materials Science and Technology, 33:1269-1289 (Feb. 15, 2017).
Zavala-Arredondo et al., “Diode area melting single-layer parametric analysis of 316L stainless steel powder,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 94:2563-2576 (Sep. 14, 2017).
Zavala-Arredondo et al., “Laser diode area melting for high speed additive manufacturing of metallic components,” Materials and Design, 117:305-315 (Jan. 3, 2017).
Zheng et al., “Bending losses of trench-assisted few-mode optical fibers,” Applied Optics, 55:2639-2648 (Apr. 1, 2016).
Zhirnov et al., “Laser beam profiling: experimental study of its influence on single-track formation by selective laser melting,” Mechanics & Industry, 16:709-1-709-6 (2015).
Zhu et al., “Effect of processing parameters on microstructure of laser solid forming Inconel 718 superalloy,” Optics and Laser Technology, 98:409-415 (Sep. 5, 2017).
Zhu et al., “Gaussian beam shaping based on multimode interference,” Proc. of SPIE, Laser Resonators and Beam Control XII, 7579:75790M-1-75790M-11 (2010).
Zou et al., “Adaptive laser shock micro-forming for MEMS device applications,” Optics Express, 25:3875-3883 (Feb. 20, 2017).
Balazic, Matej; Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing LENS Technology; http://www.lorteck.es/files/fab-aditiva/efesto-ik4-lortek-27-November-2013.pdf; Year 2013.
Khairallah et al.; Laser powder-bed fusion additive manufacturing; Effects of main physical processes on dynamical melt flow and pore formation from mesoscopic powder simulation, LLNL-JRNL-676495, Year 2015.
OPTOMEC; Enhanced LENS Thermal Imaging Capabilities Introduced by Optomec; Year 2013.
Van Newkirk et al; “Ultrasensitive vector bending sensor based on multicore optical fiber;” Opt Lett 41 32-835 (Year 2016).
Salceda-Delgado et al.; “Compact fiber-optic curvature sensor based on super-mode interference in a seven-core fiber:” Opt. Letter 40; 1468-1471; (Year 2015).
Bending Machine; CBC Alta Technolgia Italiana, General Catalog, pp. 96-97, (Year 2011).
UNI-42; Wayback capture—216-07-27; Curvatubi elettrica digitale, Year 2016.
Argyros et al.; Bend loss in highly mulitmode fibres; Optics Express; vol. 16, No. 23 ; (Year 2008).
Fini et al.; Bend distortion in large -mode-area amplifier fiber design, PROC SPIE 6781; Passive components and fiber-based devices, IV 67810; Nov. 21, 207; doi 10.11712.745949 (Year 2007).
Jacobs Joshu; “Suggested Guidelines for the Handling of Optical Fiber” Corning Incorporated; White paper; Dec. 2001; 8 pages.
UNI-60-COMBI-2; Frame-grab of You-Tube video published Sep. 26, 2011 (Year 2011).
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2013/060470, 7 pages, dated Jan. 16, 2014.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2014/017841, 5 pages, dated Jun. 5, 2014.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2014/017836, 6 pages, dated Jun. 10, 2014.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for related International Application No. PCT/US2016/041526, 6 pages, dated Oct. 20, 2016.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for related International Application No. PCT/US2016/053807, 6 pages, dated Jan. 19, 2017.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2016/063086, 6 pages, dated Mar. 23, 2017.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2017/014182, 9 pages, dated Mar. 31, 2017.
International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Application No. PCT/US2017/034848, dated Nov. 28, 2017, 15 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Application No. PCT/US2018/015768, dated Jun. 11, 2018, 15 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Application No. PCT/US2018/016305, dated Jun. 11, 2018, 10 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Application No. PCT/US2018/016288: dated Jun. 11, 2018, 10 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Application No. PCT/US2018/024145, dated Jun. 21, 2018, 5 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Application No. PCT/US2018/015710, dated Jun. 25, 2018, 17 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Application No. PCT/US2018/024548, dated Jun. 28, 2018, 6 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2018/015895, dated Jul. 10, 2018, 10 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Application No. PCT/US2018/024510, dated Jul. 12, 2018, 6 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2018/024944, dated Jul. 12, 2018, 8 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Application No. PCT/US2018/024974, dated Jul. 12, 2018, 6 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Application No. PCT/US2018/022629, dated Jul. 26, 2018, 11 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2018/023944, dated Aug. 2, 2018, 7 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2018/026110, 12 pages, dated Aug. 8, 2018.
International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Application No. PCT/US2018/023012, dated Aug. 9, 2018, 7 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2018/023963, dated Aug. 9, 2018, 7 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2018/024899, dated Aug. 9, 2018, 7 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2018/024955, dated Aug. 9, 2018, 8 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2018/024953, dated Aug. 16, 2018, 8 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Application No. PCT/US2018/024954: dated Aug. 23, 2018, 7 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Application No. PCT/US2018/024958, dated Aug. 23, 2018, 6 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Application No. PCT/US2018/024227, dated Aug. 30, 2018, 7 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Application No. PCT/US2018/024904, dated Aug. 30, 2018, 5 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Application No. PCT/US2018/024971, dated Aug. 30, 2018, 8 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Application No. PCT/US2018/024907, dated Sep. 27, 2018, 6 pages.
“Business Unit Laser Ablation and Cutting: Laser Beam Fusion Cutting with Dynamic Beam Shaping,” Fraunhofer IWS Annual Report 2015, pp. 86-87 (2015).
Goppold et al., “Dynamic Beam Shaping Improves Laser Cutting of Thick Steel Plates,” Industrial Photonics, 4:18-19 (Jul. 2017).
International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Application No. PCT/US2018/024959, dated Jun. 28, 2018, 7 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Application No. PCT/US2018/024641, dated Jul. 12, 2018, 6 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Application No. PCT/US2018/024889, dated Jul. 26, 2018, 5 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Application No. PCT/US2018/023009, dated Aug. 9, 2018, 8 pages.
lvanov et al., “Fiber-Optic Bend Sensor Based on Double Cladding Fiber,” Journal of Sensors, 2015, 6 pages (2015).
lvanov et al., “Fiber structure based on a depressed inner cladding fiber for bend, refractive index and temperature sensing,” Meas. Sci. Technol., 25:1-8 (2014).
Nazemosadat et al., “Saturable absorption in multicore fiber couplers,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B, 30:2787-2790 (Nov. 2013).
Tam et al., “An imaging fiber-based optical tweezer array for microparticle array assembly,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 84:4289-4291 (May 7, 2004).
Adelman et al., “Measurement of Relative State-to-State Rate Constants for the Reaction D + H2(v, j) → HD(v', j') + H,” J. Chem. Phys., 97:7323-7341 (Nov. 15, 1992).
Alfano et al., “Photodissociation and Recombination Dynamics of I2—in Solution,” Ultrafast Phenomena VIII, (Springer-Verlag, New York), pp. 653-655 (Jan. 1993).
“ARM,” Coherent, available at: http://www.corelase.fi/products/arm/, 6 pages, retrieved May 26, 2017.
Bernasconi et al., “Kinetics of Ionization of Nitromethane and Phenylnitromethane by Amines and Carboxylate Ions in Me2SO-Water Mixtures. Evidence of Ammonium Ion-Nitronate Ion Hydrogen Bonded Complex Formation in Me2SO-Rich Solvent Mixtures,” J. Org. Chem., 53:3342-3351 (Jul. 1988).
Blake et al., “The H + D2 Reaction: HD(v=1, J) and HD(v=2, J) Distributions at a Collision Energy of 1.3 eV,” Chem. Phys. Lett., 153:365-370 (Dec. 23, 1988).
Daniel et al., “Novel technique for mode selection in a large-mode-area fiber laser,” Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics 2010, OSA Technical Digest (CD) (Optical Society of America), paper CWC5, 2 pages (Jan. 2010).
Daniel et al., “Novel technique for mode selection in a multimode fiber laser,” Optics Express, 19:12434-12439 (Jun. 20, 2011).
Di Teodoro et al., “Diffraction-Limited, 300-kW Peak-Power Pulses from a Coiled Multimode Fiber Amplifier,” Optics Letters, 27:518-520 (May 2002).
Di Teodoro et al., “Diffraction-limited, 300-kW-peak-power Pulses from a Yb-doped Fiber Amplifier,” Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics, OSA Technical Digest (Optical Society of America, Washington, DC), p. 592-593 (May 22-24, 2002).
Di Teodoro et al., “High-peak-power pulsed fiber sources,” Proc. of SPIE, 5448:561-571 (Sep. 20, 2004).
“Efficient and Simple Precision, Laser Processing Head PDT-B,” HIGHYAG, 6 pages, (Jan. 2010).
Eichenholz, “Photonic-crystal fibers have many uses,” Optoelectronics World, 4 pages (Aug. 2004).
“ENSIS Series,” Amada America, Inc., available at: http://www.amada.com/america/ensis-3015-aj, 2 pages, retrieved May 26, 2017.
“EX-F Series,” MC Machinery Systems, Inc., available at: https://www.mcmachinery.com/products-and-solutions/ex-f-series/, 2 pages, retrieved May 26, 2017.
Farrow et al., “Bend-Loss Filtered, Large-Mode-Area Fiber Amplifiers: Experiments and Modeling,” Proceedings of the Solid State and Diode Laser Technology Review (Directed Energy Professional Society), p. 9, 5 pages (2006).
Farrow et al., “Compact Fiber Lasers for Efficient High-Power Generation,” Proc. of SPIE, 6287:62870C-1-62870C-6 (Sep. 1, 2006).
Farrow et al., “Design of Refractive-Index and Rare-Earth-Dopant Distributions for Large-Mode-Area Fibers Used in Coiled High-Power Amplifiers,” Proc. of SPIE, 6453:645310-1-64531C-11 (Feb. 2, 2007).
Farrow et al., “High-Peak-Power (>1.2 MW) Pulsed Fiber Amplifier,” Proc. of SPIE, 6102:61020L-1-61020L-11 (Mar. 2006).
Farrow et al., “Numerical Modeling of Self-Focusing Beams in Fiber Amplifiers,” Proc. of SPIE, 6453:645309-1-645309-9 (2007).
Farrow et al., “Peak-Power Limits on Pulsed Fiber Amplifiers Imposed by Self-Focusing,” Optics Lett., 31:3423-3425 (Dec. 1, 2006).
Fève et al., “Four-wave mixing in nanosecond pulsed fiber amplifiers,” Optics Express, 15:4647-4662 (Apr. 16, 2007).
Fève et al., “Limiting Effects of Four-Wave Mixing in High-Power Pulsed Fiber Amplifiers,” Proc. of SPIE, 6453:64531P-1-64531P-11 (Feb. 22, 2007).
Final Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 15/607,411, dated Feb. 1, 2018, 27 pages.
Final Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 15/607,399, dated May 3, 2018, 31 pages.
Final Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 15/607,410, dated May 11, 2018, 29 pages.
Fini, “Bend-compensated design of large-mode-area fibers,” Optics Letters, 31:1963-1965 (Jul. 1, 2006).
Fini, “Large mode area fibers with asymmetric bend compensation,” Optics Express, 19:21868-21873 (Oct. 24, 2011).
Fini et al., “Bend-compensated large-mode-area fibers: achieving robust single-modedness with transformation optics,” Optics Express, 21:19173-19179 (Aug. 12, 2013).
Fox et al., “Effect of low-earth orbit space on radiation-induced absorption in rare-earth-doped optical fibers,” J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 378:79-88 (Oct. 15, 2013).
Fox et al., “Gamma Radiation Effects in Yb-Doped Optical Fiber,” Proc. of the SPIE, 6453:645328-1-645328-9 (Feb. 23, 2007).
Fox et al., “Gamma-Radiation-Induced Photodarkening in Unpumped Optical Fibers Doped with Rare-Earth Constituents,” IEEE Trans. on Nuclear Science, 57:1618-1625 (Jun. 2010).
Fox et al., “Investigation of radiation-induced photodarkening in passive erbium-, ytterbium-, and Yb/Er co-doped optical fibers,” Proc. of the SPIE, 6713:67130R-1-67130R-9 (Sep. 26, 2007).
Fox et al., “Radiation damage effects in doped fiber materials,” Proc. of the SPIE, 6873:68731F-1-68731F-9 (Feb. 22, 2008).
Fox et al., “Spectrally Resolved Transmission Loss in Gamma Irradiated Yb-Doped Optical Fibers,” IEEE J. Quant. Electron., 44:581-586 (Jun. 2008).
Fox et al., “Temperature and Dose-Rate Effects in Gamma Irradiated Rare-Earth Doped Fibers,” Proc. of SPIE, 7095:70950B-1-70950B-8 (Aug. 26, 2008).
Ghasemi et al., “Beam shaping design for coupling high power diode laser stack to fiber,” Applied Optics, 50:2927-2930 (Jun. 20, 2011).
Ghatak et al., “Design of Waveguide Refractive Index Profile to Obtain Flat Model Field,” SPIE, 3666:40-44 (Apr. 1999).
Goers et al., “Development of a Compact Gas Imaging Sensor Employing cw Fiber-Amp-Pumped PPLN OPO,” Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics, OSA Technical Digest (Optical Society of America, Washington, DC), p. 521 (May 11, 2001).
Goldberg et al., “Deep UV Generation by Frequency Tripling and Quadrupling of a High-Power Modelocked Semiconductor Laser,” Proceedings of the Quantum Electronics and Laser Science Conference, QPD18-2 (Baltimore) 2 pages (May 1995).
Goldberg et al., “Deep UV Generation by Frequency Quadrupling of a High-Power GaAlAs Semiconductor Laser,” Optics Lett., 20:1145-1147 (May 15, 1995).
Goldberg et al., “High Efficiency 3 W Side-Pumped Yb Fiber Amplifier and Laser,” Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics, OSA Technical Digest (Optical Society of America, Washington, DC), p. 11-12 (May 24, 1999).
Goldberg et al., “Highly Efficient 4-W Yb-Doped Fiber Amplifier Pumped by a Broad-Stripe Laser Diode,” Optics Lett., 24:673-675 (May 15, 1999).
Goldberg et al., “High-Power Superfluorescent Source with a Side-Pumped Yb-Doped Double-Cladding Fiber,” Optics Letters, 23:1037-1039 (Jul. 1, 1998).
Goldberg et al., “Tunable UV Generation at 286 nm by Frequency Tripling of a High-Power Modelocked Semiconductor Laser,” Optics Lett., 20:1640-1642 (Aug. 1, 1995).
Golub, “Laser Beam Splitting by Diffractive Optics,” Optics and Photonics News, 6 pages (Feb. 2004).
Han et al., “Reshaping collimated laser beams with Gaussian profile to uniform profiles,” Applied Optics, 22:3644-3647 (Nov. 15, 1983).
Headrick et al., “Application of laser photofragmentation-resonance enhanced multiphoton ionization to ion mobility spectrometry,” Applied Optics, 49:2204-2214 (Apr. 10, 2010).
Hemenway et al., “Advances in high-brightness fiber-coupled laser modules for pumping multi-kW CW fiber lasers,” Proceedings of SPIE, 10086:1008605-1-1008605-7 (Feb. 22, 2017).
Hemenway et al.,“ High-brightness, fiber-coupled pump modules in fiber laser applications,” Proc. of SPIE, 8961:89611V-1-89611V-12 (Mar. 7, 2014).
Hoops et al., “Detection of mercuric chloride by photofragment emission using a frequency-converted fiber amplifier,” Applied Optics, 46:4008-4014 (Jul. 1, 2007).
Hotoleanu et al., “High Order Mode Suppression in Large Mode Area Active Fibers by Controlling the Radial Distribution of the Rare Earth Dopant,” Proc. of the SPIE, 6102:61021T-1-61021T-8 (Feb. 23, 2006).
“How to Select a Beamsplitter,” IDEX—Optics & Photonics Marketplace, available at: https://www.cvilaseroptics.com/file/general/beamSplitters.pdf, 5 pages (Jan. 8, 2014).
Huang et al., “Double-cutting beam shaping technique for high-power diode laser area light source,” Optical Engineering, 52:106108-1-106108-6 (Oct. 2013).
Injeyan et al., “Introduction to Optical Fiber Lasers,” High-Power Laser Handbook, pp. 436-439 (2011).
Ishiguro et al., “High Efficiency 4-kW Fiber Laser Cutting Machine,” Rev. Laser Eng., 39:680-684 (May 21, 2011).
Johnson et al., “Experimental and Theoretical Study of Inhomogeneous Electron Transfer in Betaine: Comparisons of Measured and Predicted Spectral Dynamics,” Chem. Phys., 176:555-574 (Oct. 15, 1993).
Johnson et al., “Ultrafast Experiments on the Role of Vibrational Modes in Electron Transfer,” Pure and Applied Chem., 64:1219-1224 (May 1992).
Kliner, “Novel, High-Brightness, Fibre Laser Platform for kW Materials Processing Applications,” 2015 European Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics—European Quantum Electronics Conference (Optical Society of America, 2015), paper CJ_11_2, 1 page (Jun. 21-25, 2015).
Kliner et al., “4-kW fiber laser for metal cutting and welding,” Proc. of SPIE, 7914:791418-791418-8 (Feb. 22, 2011).
Kliner et al., “Comparison of Experimental and Theoretical Absolute Rates for Intervalence Electron Transfer,” J. Am. Chem. Soc., 114:8323-8325 (Oct. 7, 1992).
Kliner et al., “Comparison of Experimental and Theoretical Integral Cross Sections for D + H2(v=1, j=1) → HD(v'=1, j') + H,” J. Chem. Phys., 95:1648-1662 (Aug. 1, 1991).
Kliner et al., “D + H2(v=1, J=1): Rovibronic State to Rovibronic State Reaction Dynamics,” J. Chem. Phys., 92:2107-2109 (Feb. 1, 1990).
Kliner et al. “Effect of Indistinguishable Nuclei on Product Rotational Distributions: H + HI → H2 + I reactiona),” J. Chem. Phys., 90:4625-4327 (Apr. 15, 1989).
Kliner et al., “Efficient second, third, fourth, and fifth harmonic generation of a Yb-doped fiber amplifier,” Optics Communications, 210:393-398 (Sep. 15, 2002).
Kliner et al., “Efficient UV and Visible Generation Using a Pulsed Yb-Doped Fiber Amplifier,” Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics, OSA Technical Digest (Optical Society of America, Washington, DC), p. CPDC10-1-CPDC10-3 (May 19-22, 2002).
Kliner et al., “Efficient visible and UV generation by frequency conversion of a mode-filtered fiber amplifier,” Proc. of SPIE, 4974:230-235 (Jul. 3, 2003).
Kliner et al., “Fiber laser allows processing of highly reflective materials,” Industrial Laser Solutions, 31:1-9 (Mar. 16, 2016).
Kliner et al., “High-Power Fiber Lasers,” Photonics & Imaging Technology, pp. 2-5 (Mar. 2017).
Kliner et al., “Laboratory Investigation of the Catalytic Reduction Technique for Detection of Atmospheric NOy,” J. Geophys. Res., 102:10759-10776 (May 20, 1997).
Kliner et al., “Laser Reflections: How fiber laser users are successfully processing highly reflective metals,” Shop Floor Lasers, available at: http://www.shopfloorlasers.com/laser-cutting/fiber/354-laser-reflections, 9 pages (Jan./Feb. 2017).
Kliner et al., “Measurements of Ground-State OH Rotational Energy-Transfer Rates,” J. Chem. Phys., 110:412-422 (Jan. 1, 1999).
Kliner et al., “Mode-Filtered Fiber Amplifier,” Sandia National Laboratories—Brochure, 44 pages (Sep. 13, 2007).
Kliner et al., “Narrow-Band, Tunable, Semiconductor-Laser-Based Source for Deep-UV Absorption Spectroscopy,” Optics Letters, 22:1418-1420 (Sep. 15, 1997).
Kliner et al., “Overview of Sandia's fiber laser program,” Proceedings of SPIE—The International Society for Optical Engineering, 6952:695202-1-695202-12 (Apr. 14, 2008).
Kliner et al., “Photodissociation and Vibrational Relaxation of I2 in Ethanol,” J. Chem. Phys., 98:5375-5389 (Apr. 1, 1993).
Kliner et al., “Photodissociation Dynamics of I2 in Solution,” Ultrafast Reaction Dynamics and Solvent Effects, (American Institute of Physics, New York), pp. 16-35 (Feb. 1994).
Kliner et al., “Polarization-Maintaining Amplifier Employing Double-Clad, Bow-Tie Fiber,” Optics Lett., 26:184-186 (Feb. 15, 2001).
Kliner et al., “Power Scaling of Diffraction-Limited Fiber Sources,” Proc. of SPIE, 5647:550-556 (Feb. 21, 2005).
Kliner et al., “Power Scaling of Rare-Earth-Doped Fiber Sources,” Proc. of SPIE, 5653:257-261 (Jan. 12, 2005).
Kliner et al., “Product Internal-State Distribution for the Reaction H + HI → H2 + I,” J. Chem. Phys., 95:1663-1670 (Aug. 1, 1991).
Kliner et al., “The D + H2 Reaction: Comparison of Experiment with Quantum-Mechanical and Quasiclassical Calculations,” Chem. Phys. Lett., 166:107-111 (Feb. 16, 1990).
Kliner et al., “The H+para-H2 reaction: Influence of dynamical resonances on H2(v' = 1, j' = 1 and 3) Integral Cross Sections,” J. Chem. Phys., 94:1069-1080 (Jan. 15, 1991).
Koplow et al., “A New Method for Side Pumping of Double-Clad Fiber Sources,” J. Quantum Electronics, 39:529-540 (Apr. 4, 2003).
Koplow et al., “Compact 1-W Yb-Doped Double-Cladding Fiber Amplifier Using V-Groove Side-Pumping,” IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett., 10:793-795 (Jun. 1998).
Koplow et al., “Development of a Narrowband, Tunable, Frequency-Quadrupled Diode Laser for UV Absorption Spectroscopy,” Appl. Optics, 37:3954-3960 (Jun. 20, 1998).
Koplow et al., “Diode-Bar Side-Pumping of Double-Clad Fibers,” Proc. of SPIE, 5709:284-300 (Apr. 22, 2005).
Koplow et al., “High Power PM Fiber Amplifier and Broadband Source,” Optical Fiber Communication Conference, OSA Technical Digest (Optical Society of America, Washington, DC), p. 12-13 (Mar. 7-10, 2000).
Koplow et al., “Polarization-Maintaining, Double-Clad Fiber Amplifier Employing Externally Applied Stress-Induced Birefringence,” Optics Lett., 25:387-389 (Mar. 15, 2000).
Koplow et al., “Single-mode operation of a coiled multimode fiber amplifier,” Optics Letters, 25:442-444 (Apr. 1, 2000).
Koplow et al., “Use of Bend Loss to Obtain Single-Transverse-Mode Operation of a Multimode Fiber Amplifier,” Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics, OSA Technical Digest (Optical Society of America, Washington, DC), p. 286-287 (May 7-12, 2000).
Koplow et al., “UV Generation by Frequency Quadrupling of a Yb-Doped Fiber Amplifier,” IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett., 10:75-77 (Jan. 1998).
Koponen et al., “Photodarkening Measurements in Large-Mode-Area Fibers,” Proc. of SPIE, 6453:64531E-1-64531E-12 (Feb. 2007).
Kotlyar et al., “Asymmetric Bessel-Gauss beams,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, 31:1977-1983 (Sep. 2014).
Kulp et al., “The application of quasi-phase-matched parametric light sources to practical infrared chemical sensing systems,” Appl. Phys. B, 75:317-327 (Jun. 6, 2002).
“Laser cutting machines,” TRUMPF, available at: http://www.us.trumpf.com/en/products/machine-tools/products/2d-laser-cutting/innovative-technology/brightline.html, 9 pages, retrieved May 26, 2017.
“Lasers & Fibers,” NKT Photonics, available at: https://www.nktphotonics.com/lasers-fibers/technology/photonic-crystal-fibers/, 4 pages, retrieved Feb. 13, 2018.
Longhi et al., “Self-focusing and nonlinear periodic beams in parabolic index optical fibres,” J. Opt. B: Quantum Semiclass. Opt., 6:S303-S308 (May 2004).
Maechling et al., “Sum Frequency Spectra in the C-H Stretch Region of Adsorbates on Iron,”Appl. Spectrosc., 47:167-172 (Feb. 1, 1993).
McComb et al., “Pulsed Yb:fiber system capable of >250 kW peak power with tunable pulses in the 50 ps to 1.5 ns range,” Proc. of SPIE, 8601:86012T-1-86012T-11 (Mar. 23, 2013).
Moore et al., “Diode-bar side pumping of double-clad fibers,” Proc. of SPIE, 6453:64530K-1-64530K-9 (Feb. 20, 2007).
Neuhauser et al., “State-to-State Rates for the D + H2(v = 1, j = 1) → HD(v', j') + H Reaction: Predictions and Measurements,” Science, 257:519-522 (Jul. 24, 1992).
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 15/607,399, dated Sep. 20, 2017, 25 pages.
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 15/607,411, dated Sep. 26, 2017, 15 pages.
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 15/607,410, dated Oct. 3, 2017, 32 pages.
Price et al., “High-brightness fiber-coupled pump laser development,” Proc. of SPIE, 7583:758308-1-758308-7 (Feb. 2010).
Rinnen et al., “Construction of a Shuttered Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometer for Selective Ion Detection,” Rev. Sci. Instrum., 60:717-719 (Apr. 1989).
Rinnen et al., “Effect of Indistinguishable Nuclei on Product Rotational Distributions: D + DI → D2 + I,” Chem. Phys. Lett., 169:365-371 (Jun. 15, 1990).
Rinnen et al. “Quantitative Determination of HD Internal State Distributions via (2+1) REMPI,” Isr. J. Chem., 29:369-382 (Mar. 7, 1989).
Rinnen et al., “Quantitative determination of H2, HD, and D2 internal state distributions via (2+1) resonance-enhanced multiphoton ionization,” J. Chem. Phys., 95:214-225 (Jul. 1, 1991).
Rinnen et al., “The H + D2 Reaction: “Prompt” HD Distributions at High Collision Energies,” Chem. Phys. Lett., 153:371-375 (Dec. 23, 1988).
Rinnen et al., “The H + D2 Reaction: Quantum State Distributions at Collision Energies of 1.3 and 0.55 eV,” J. Chem. Phys., 91:7514-7529 (Dec. 15, 1989).
Romero et al., “Lossless laser beam shaping,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, 13:751-760 (Apr. 1996).
Russell, “Photonic-Crystal Fibers,” IEEE JLT, 24:4729-4749 (Dec. 2006).
Saleh et al., “Chapter 9.4 Holey and Photonic-Crystal Fibers,” Fundamentals of Photonics, Second Edition, pp. 359-362 (2007).
Sanchez-Rubio et al., “Wavelength Beam Combining for Power and Brightness Scaling of Laser Systems,” Lincoln Laboratory Journal, 20:52-66 (Aug. 2014).
Saracco et al., “Compact, 17 W average power, 100 kW peak power, nanosecond fiber laser system,” Proc. of SPIE, 8601:86012U-1-86012U-13 (Mar. 22, 2013).
Schrader et al., “Fiber-Based Laser with Tunable Repetition Rate, Fixed Pulse Duration, and Multiple Wavelength Output,” Proc. of the SPIE, 6453:64530D-164530D-9 (Feb. 20, 2007).
Schrader et al., “High-Power Fiber Amplifier with Widely Tunable Repetition Rate, Fixed Pulse Duration, and Multiple Output Wavelengths,” Optics Express, 14:11528-11538 (Nov. 27, 2006).
Schrader et al., “Power scaling of fiber-based amplifiers seeded with microchip lasers,” Proc. of the SPIE, 6871:68710T-1-68710T-11 (Feb. 2008).
Sheehan et al., “Faserlaser zur Bearbeitung hochreflektierender Materialien (Fiber laser processing of highly reflective materials),” Laser, 3:92-94 (Jun. 2017).
Sheehan et al. “High-brightness fiber laser advances remote laser processing,” Industrial Laser Solutions, 31:1-9 (Nov. 2, 2016).
Sun et al., “Optical Surface Transformation: Changing the optical surface by homogeneous optic-null medium at will,” Scientific Reports, 5:16032-1-16032-20 (Oct. 30, 2015).
Tominaga et al., “Femtosecond Experiments and Absolute Rate Calculations on Intervalence Electron Transfer in Mixed-Valence Compounds,” J. Chem. Phys., 98:1228-1243 (Jan. 15, 1993).
Tominaga et al., “Ultrafast Studies of Intervalence Charge Transfer,” Ultrafast Phenomena VIII, (Springer-Verlag, New York), pp. 582- 584 (1993).
“Triple Clad Ytterbium-Doped Polarization Maintaining Fibers,” nuFERN Driven to Light Specifications, 1 page (Jan. 2006).
Varshney et al., “Design of a flat field fiber with very small dispersion slope,” Optical Fiber Technology, 9(3):189-198 (Oct. 2003).
Wetter et al., “High power cladding light strippers,” Proc. of SPIE, 6873:687327-1-687327-8 (Jan. 21, 2008).
Xiao et al., “Fiber coupler for mode selection and high-efficiency pump coupling,” Optics Letters, 38:1170-1172 (Apr. 1, 2013).
Yaney et al., “Distributed-Feedback Dye Laser for Picosecond UV and Visible Spectroscopy,” Rev. Sci. Instrum, 71:1296-1305 (Mar. 2000).
Yu et al., “1.2-kW single-mode fiber laser based on 100-W high-brightness pump diodes,” Proc. of SPIE, 8237:82370G-1-82370G-7 (Feb. 16, 2012).
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20180331488 A1 Nov 2018 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
62138926 Mar 2015 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 15074838 Mar 2016 US
Child 16028694 US