The invention relates to a nonwoven fabric, particularly for a filter medium, comprising at least one fiber strand having at least one first section and one second section in the longitudinal direction.
Nonwoven fabrics of this type are used in filter media, e.g. for air filters or air conditioning system filters, particularly however for air filters for motor vehicle interiors or engine filters.
Nonwoven fabrics are usually produced in a primary forming process, particularly a melt-spinning process such as, for example, a spun-bond or a melt-blown process as described e.g. in DE 41 23 122 A1.
The intake air of internal combustion engines, for example in motor vehicles or in off-road applications, is normally filtered to protect the engine's combustion chamber from mechanical damage due to particles sucked in from the surrounding air. An important design criterion for the elements is ensuring long filter service life along with concurrently high effective filtration of ingested particles.
Then again, however, motor vehicles have a precisely calculated energy distribution system. Only limited amounts of energy are provided for heating/ventilation/cooling, particularly in the case of electric vehicles. Due to ever stricter exhaust regulations, these energy quantities continually need to be markedly reduced, particularly also in the case of electric vehicles in which, to the greatest extent possible, mechanical energy is only to be expended for propulsion. There are also narrow limits governing the costs of vehicle components. On the other hand, vehicle buyers are continually demanding greater comfort and safety. From these perspectives, particle filters having the lowest possible loss or pressure differential are of special significance as the fan motor only needs to generate a lower pressure, with energy consumption consequently being less. Moreover, due to the lesser amount of power required, they also run more quietly which reduces noise and thus considerably increases driving comfort.
The demand for filter systems having low pressure differentials competes with the required filtration efficiency and the required service life; i.e. the amount of time expressed in mileage which a filter can remain in the vehicle before needing to be replaced. For example, pollen filters which only filter pollen out of the air flowing into the vehicle are not enough for vehicle interiors. The allergens which cause the immune system to react are proteins having diameters of only a fraction of the diameter of pollen. They are in the 0.1 μm size range; i.e. the range which is most problematic for particle filters, the so-called MPPS (Most Penetrating Particle Size) range. Correspondingly, the filtration efficiency at this size should be at least 50%, whereby this is measured by means of an aerosol having particles of roughly the same size as the particles to be filtered, e.g. sodium chloride. At the same time, the service life of such filters installed into motor vehicles should be at least 30,000 kilometers.
In common filters, e.g. ring filters or frame filters, the nonwoven filter medium has a zigzag folding; i.e. is pleated in order to increase the surface of the filter medium per unit of filter area. So that the filter medium will be pleatable, it needs to have a certain rigidity. A certain rigidity to the filter medium is also desirable in the pleated state to prevent the individual folds of the pleating from collapsing on top of each other upon the inflow of air to be filtered.
Different methods are known from the prior art for increasing the rigidity of a filter medium. It is for example known to provide a filter medium with a texturing to effect reinforcement of the material due to its three-dimensional structure.
Using bicomponent fibers which combine the properties of two different polymers in one nonwoven fabric is furthermore known. A nonwoven fabric having high-strength tear-resistant component fibers is for example disclosed in EP 1 866 472 B1.
Known nonwoven fabrics of increased rigidity thereby have the disadvantage on the one hand of only being able to be manufactured at increased expenditure and/or the rigidity only being able to be increased by subsequent processing of the nonwoven fabric.
The invention is therefore based on the task of providing a nonwoven fabric of increased rigidity which can be easily and economically produced, particularly on already existent apparatus.
This task is solved according to the invention by a nonwoven fabric and a method for producing a nonwoven fabric.
Inventive thickenings act as structural reinforcements of the nonwoven fabric, contributing to the increase in the nonwoven fabric's rigidity. The nonwoven fabric thereby becomes better pleatable and also keeps its surface form better. Individual pleats of a filter thereby do not collapse or fall onto each other upon inflow of air to be filtered and thus a large filter surface is maintained.
A nonwoven fabric as defined by the invention is a nonwoven material in which strands of fibers are deposited on top of each other in a primary forming process and bond into a nonwoven. If necessary, hardening takes place in a further step by means of calendering, thermobonding, hot-air and/or ultrasonic welding.
A fiber strand in the sense of the invention is formed by one or more fibers, wherein the fiber(s) have no interruption in the longitudinal direction, are therefore of one piece.
A thickening in the sense of the invention is an enlargement of the fiber strand's diameter and/or circumference.
A crimping in the sense of the invention is a twisting in the fiber strand itself and is preferably characterized as the so-called crimp. To determine same, one needs the length of the fiber in the crimped and stretched state and a determination of the tensile force thereby required. Such a determination can in particular be made pursuant DIN 53840.
A fiber bundle in the sense of the invention consists of a plurality of fiber strands.
A polymer in the sense of the invention is a pure polymer or a polymer mixture comprising at least concentrations of two polymers as components. Preferably, other substances or impurities can also be components of the polymer mixture. These particularly exhibit a characteristic distribution in molecular chain length and/or a characteristic molecular structure.
Air permeability as defined by the invention is that volume per square meter which flows through a nonwoven fabric at preferably 200 Pa inflow pressure per second.
Filtration efficiency as defined by the invention is determined by NaCl particles, particularly 0.3 to 0.5 μm in size and preferably pursuant to DIN 71460-1, at an inflow velocity of preferably 0.14 m/s.
Mass distribution in the sense of the invention is the mass per unit area and is preferably determined pursuant to DIN EN 29073-1.
Average pore size in the sense of the patent is preferably determined based on the bubble point test according to the ASTM D6767, ASTM F316-0 and/or ISO 2942, ISO 4003 standards, particularly with the Topas PSM 165 measuring device.
Viscosity in the sense of the invention is a measure of a fluid's thickness. The higher the viscosity, the more resistant the fluid is to flow (less capable of flow); the lower the viscosity, the less resistant it is (more capable of flow), can thus flow faster under the same conditions. One measure of the viscosity of a plastic melt is the melt flow index which is indicated as the melt volume-flow rate and/or the melt mass-flow rate. In accordance with the invention, viscosity is preferably determined according to the common test procedures of the DIN EN ISO 1133-1:2011 standard. According to the invention, the conditions for determining the melt flow rate of thermoplastic materials are preferably defined pursuant to the following international standards:
amelt density values for this materialmay be included in thematerial standard.
Preferential embodiments are claimed in the subclaims.
Preferably, the viscosity of the first polymer or first polymer mixture respectively at 230° C. and a pressure of 2.16 kg amounts to approximately 200-1200 ccm/10 min, preferentially approximately 300-800 ccm/10 min, most preferentially approximately 400-700 ccm/10 min.
Preferably, the viscosity of the second polymer at 230° C. and a pressure of 2.16 kg amounts to approximately 5-80 ccm/10 min, preferentially 10-50 ccm/10 min, preferentially 12-30 ccm/10 min, more preferentially 14-20 ccm/10 min and most preferentially 17 ccm/10 min.
In one preferential embodiment, the diameter of a thickening at its widest point in relation to the average diameter of the fiber strand in the at least one first fiber section amounts to at least 3:1, preferentially at least 2:1, preferentially at least 1.7:1 and most preferentially at least 1.5:1.
In a further preferential embodiment, the fiber strand in the first fiber section has an average diameter of approximately 0.5-20 μm, preferentially approximately 1-9 μm, preferentially approximately 3-6 μm and most preferentially approximately 5 μm.
In a further preferential embodiment, the diameter of the thickening at its widest point in relation to the longitudinal elongation of the thickening of the at least one integral fiber strand amounts to approximately 0.5:1 to 1:1, preferentially approximately 1:1 to 2:1 and most preferentially approximately 2:1 to 4:1.
In a further preferential embodiment, the thickening exhibits a crimping of the fiber strand. The crimping in particular hereby forms the thickening. The crimping reinforces the relative fiber strand in the second section, particularly due to the interaction between individual swirls of the fiber strand.
In a further preferential embodiment, the thickening comprises at least one crimping and/or at least one fiber bundle. The crimping and/or fiber bundle results in not only the individual fiber strands themselves being reinforced but also cooperatively reinforcing adjacent fiber strands.
In one preferential embodiment, the thickening exhibits entwined fiber strand loops. The interaction of individual fiber strand loops also results in reinforcing the nonwoven fabric. Alternatively, the loops of multiple fiber strands can also be entwined.
In a further preferential embodiment, the thickening exhibits an area in which the fiber strand rests upon itself and is preferentially at least partially fused in said area. The fusing of adjacent areas also increases the rigidity of the nonwoven fabric.
In a further preferential embodiment, the first fiber section is substantially of a first polymer or First polymer mixture and the second fiber section is substantially of a second polymer or second polymer mixture, whereby the second polymer has a higher viscosity than the first polymer.
Selecting different polymers for the fiber strand sections can achieve different material properties for the individual sections. A suitable material selection can intensify the increased rigidity afforded by the thickenings. Furthermore, suitably selecting the material for the second section can, as applicable, give rise to thickening seven forming in the first place.
In a further preferential embodiment, the percentage of the second polymer in the nonwoven fabric amounts to 2-20% by weight, preferentially 5-15% by weight and most preferentially 10% by weight. These percentages have proven to be particularly advantageous for reinforcing the nonwoven fabric. Preferably, the second polymer or second polymer mixture respectively is not homogeneously mixed with the first polymer or first polymer mixture.
In a further preferential embodiment, the second fiber section adjoins the first fiber section and the integral fiber strand comprises a third fiber section adjoining the second fiber section and having a structure substantially identical to the first fiber section.
Again changing the polymer composition in the third fiber section gives the fiber section a macrostructure which is substantially identical to that of the first fiber section and therefore exhibiting substantially no tangling and/or thickenings.
In a further preferential embodiment, the first layer has a mass distribution of approximately 25-45 g/m2, preferentially approximately 30-40 g/m2 and most preferentially approximately 35 g/m2 and/or a thickness of approximately 0.4 mm to approximately 0.7 mm, preferentially approximately 0.5 mm to approximately 0.6 mm and most preferentially approximately 0.55 mm.
It has been determined that particularly good particulate matter storage capacity and/or particularly good filtration efficiency is imparted to the first layer at these parameter values.
In a further preferential embodiment, the first layer has an average of approximately 2 to 10, preferentially approximately 4 to 8 thickenings/cm2, particularly preferentially approximately 5 to 7 thickenings/cm2 and most preferentially approximately 6 thickenings/cm2.
Good stabilization of the first layer or filter medium respectively at only slightly lesser filtration efficiency has been determined at these thickening concentrations.
In a further preferential embodiment, the first layer exhibits an air permeability of approximately 5000-7000 l/(m2s), preferentially approximately 5500-6500 l/(m2s) and most preferentially approximately 6000 l/(m2s), and/or a filtration efficiency of approximately 10-20% and preferentially approximately 15%.
These parameter values are particularly well suited to utilizing the filter medium as an air filter, particularly in a motor vehicle.
In a further preferential embodiment, the filter medium additionally comprises a second layer, the pore size of which is on average substantially smaller than that of the first layer.
Further stabilization of the filter medium is achieved by this second layer. This second layer can furthermore pre-filter coarse dust particles.
In a further preferential embodiment, the second layer has a mass distribution of approximately 45-75 g/m2, preferentially approximately 50-70 g/m2, particularly preferentially approximately 55-65 g/m2 and most preferentially approximately 60 g/m2, and/or a thickness of approximately 0.5-0.9 mm, preferentially approximately 0.6-0.8 mm and most preferentially approximately 0.7 mm.
It has been determined that particularly good particulate matter storage capacity and/or particularly good filtration efficiency is imparted to the second layer at these parameter values.
In a further preferential embodiment, the second layer exhibits an air permeability of approximately 3000-4000 l/(m2s), preferentially approximately 3250-3750 l/(m2s) and most preferentially approximately 3500 l/(m2s), and/or a filtration efficiency of approximately 10-25%, preferentially approximately 15-20% and most preferentially approximately 17.5%.
These parameter values are particularly well suited to utilizing the filter medium as an air filter, particularly in a motor vehicle.
In a further preferential embodiment, the filter medium additionally comprises a third layer, the pore size of which is on average substantially smaller than that of the second layer and which is preferentially arranged on the far side of the first layer from the second layer.
Since its material has a high static charge capacity, this layer is particularly well-suited to being used as an electret filter layer in the filter medium.
In a further preferential embodiment, the third layer has a mass distribution of approximately 35-60 g/m2, preferentially approximately 40-55 g/m2, particularly preferentially approximately 45-50 g/m2 and most preferentially approximately 47.5 g/m2, and/or a thickness of approximately 0.4-0.7 mm, preferentially approximately 0.5-0.6 mm and most preferentially approximately 0.55 mm.
It has been determined that particularly good particulate matter storage capacity and/or particularly good filtration efficiency is imparted to the third layer at these parameter values.
In a further preferential embodiment, the third layer exhibits an air permeability of approximately 800-1300 l/(m2s), preferentially approximately 900-1200 l/(m2s) and most preferentially approximately 1000 l/(m2s), and/or a filtration efficiency of approximately 40-80%, preferentially approximately 50-70% and most preferentially approximately 60%.
These parameter values are particularly well suited to utilizing the filter medium as an air filter, particularly in a motor vehicle.
In a further preferential embodiment, the three layers together have a mass distribution of approximately 105-180 g/m2, preferentially approximately 120-160 g/m2 and most preferentially approximately 140 g/m2, and/or a thickness of approximately 1.2-2.5 mm, preferentially approximately 1.3-2.3 mm, particularly preferentially approximately 1.5-2.1 mm, more preferentially approximately 1.7-1.9 mm and most preferentially approximately 1.8 mm.
It has been determined that these parameter values impart particularly good particulate matter storage capacity and/or particularly good filtration efficiency to the three-layer filter medium.
In a further preferential embodiment, the three layers together exhibit an air permeability of approximately 500-1300 l/(m2s), preferentially approximately 600-1200 l/(m2s), particularly preferentially approximately 800-1000 l/(m2s) and most preferentially approximately 900 l/(m2s).
These parameter values are also particularly well suited to the use of the filter medium as an air filter, particularly in a motor vehicle.
The method according to the invention has the advantage of being able to produce sections of a fiber strand, so-called fiber sections, of different structures in the primary forming process without any subsequent processing of the fiber strands or nonwoven fabric being required. Different layers of a nonwoven fabric having varying structures can also be produced simultaneously in one single primary forming process. This is not possible when structural changes in a layer cannot be made until subsequent processing since each further layer can then only be applied in a further primary forming process.
Further enabled is that fiber strands having multiple structures can be integrally formed by changing the parameters. If the obtaining of other similar structures is provided by partially or temporarily introducing fiber strands, they would thus form drops, so-called shots, at their beginning and end which would lead to reducing the quality of the nonwoven fabric, particularly the particulate matter storage capacity.
In one preferential embodiment, at least two polymers are mixed to produce the first polymer melt such that the polymers in the first polymer melt are preferably inhomogeneously distributed.
Providing areas in the polymer melt in which different polymers dominate produces fiber strands having fiber sections of differing material structures when the polymer melt discharges from a spinning beam in the primary forming process. Preferably, granulate clusters of a second polymer or polymer mixture thereby homogeneously mix with the granulates of a first polymer or polymer mixture. When this mixture is melted, islands of the second polymer/polymer mixture form in the melt, making the first polymer/polymer mixture inhomogeneous.
In a further preferential embodiment, at least one of the polymers, particularly the first polymer, is in the melted state when mixed.
By mixing the second polymer into the melted first polymer or vice versa, individual areas can be produced in the melted first “main polymer” in which the respective mixed-in second polymer predominates. An inhomogeneous mixing of polymer areas can thus be achieved, however with homogeneous arrangement of the respective areas.
In accordance with the invention, multiple embodiments of the invention described above can also be—where technically expedient—combined at will.
Reference will be made to the drawings in the following description of preferential embodiments in specifying the above as well as further advantages, features and possible applications of the present invention. The drawings depict the following:
As
As a rule, fiber strands 2 do not end in thickenings 5; instead, a fiber strand 2 with a thickening 5 continues on in a first fiber section 3 and a third fiber section 6 on both sides of the second fiber section 4. This differentiates the thickenings particularly from so-called shots which form in a nonwoven fabric when the fiber strand 2 tears off during the manufacturing process. Since the thickenings 5 are part of the fiber strands 2, good filtration efficiency to the nonwoven fabric 1 is maintained despite the accumulation of fiber strand-forming polymer at the site of a thickening 5.
This is attributable to the fact that the surface area of the thickenings 5 can also absorb particles to be filtered.
A nonwoven fabric 1 in accordance with the invention achieves better filtration efficiency than a material reinforced with a second fiber or a bicomponent fiber having similar rigidity values as the inventive nonwoven fabric 1.
A polymer is first discharged from the spinning beam 12 under pressure. The dispersed polymer is drawn out by means of a process airflow circulating above the spinning beam 12, indicated in
Lastly, as depicted on the far right in
The thickenings 5 form due to the fact of the second polymer 10 having a higher viscosity than the first polymer 9, which is why the process airflow cannot draw it out so easily. It therefore remains longer in the area of a spinneret of the spinning beam 12 and accumulates there into a structure corresponding to a third section 4, which eventually forms a thickening 5.
Alternatively or additionally to different polymers 9, 10, the process temperature and/or process air speed at the spinning beam 12 or the spinnerets of the spinning beam 12 respectively can preferably also be varied so as to affect the viscosity of a single polymer in order to respectively form the first section 3, second section 4 and third section 6.
The percentage of the higher-viscosity polymer in the melt typically amounts to 2-20% by weight (weight percent), preferentially 5-15% by weight and most preferentially 10% by weight.
Applicable polymers for producing a nonwoven fabric 1 in accordance with the invention include for the first polymer 9 preferably synthetic polymers, particularly polyesters, selected from among the group consisting of polyethylene (PE), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polycarbonate (PC), polyamide (PA), polypropylene (PP), polyvinylchloride (PVC), polybutylene terephthalate (PBT) and mixtures thereof. Applicable with respect to the second polymer 10 are preferably synthetic polymers selected from among the group consisting of polyethylene (PE), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polycarbonate (PC), polyamide (PA), polypropylene terephthalate (PPT), polypropylene (PP), polyester, polyvinyl chloride (PVC), polybutylene terephthalate (PBT) and mixtures thereof. Any combination of the first polymer 9 and the second polymer 10 can be used. Furthermore, mixtures of different polymers as above or others can preferably be used for the first polymer 9 as well as for the second polymer 10.
Preferable suitable combinations of a first polymer 9 and second polymer 10 are as follows: PET and PC, PET and PA, PET and PP, PET and PE, PET and PVC, PET and PBT, PC and PA, PC and PP, PC and PE, PC and PVC, PC and PBT, PA and PP, PA and PE, PA and PVC, PA and PBT, PP and PE, PP and PVC, PP and PBT, PE and PVC, PE and PBT, or PVC and PBT.
Further preferably suitable combinations are as follows: PBT and PVC, PBT and PE, PBT and PP, PBT and PA, PBT and PC, PBT and PET, PVC and PE, PVC and PP, PVC and PA, PVC and PC, PVC and PET, PE and PP, PE and PA, PE and PC, PE and PET, PP and PA, PP and PC, PP and PET, PA and PC, PA and PET, or PC and PET.
Two polymers having the same structural formula but different characteristic distribution in molecular chain length are also particularly suitable as the first polymer 9 and second polymer 10. Polymer compositions of the above-cited polymers are likewise suitable as the first polymer 9 and/or the second polymer 10.
Lastly, as illustrated with reference to the preceding figures, the nonwoven fabric 1 can also be produced from just one single polymer and/or just one single characteristic molecular chain length from this group.
It is also possible to combine the manufacturing processes 8 presented in
A first layer 12 of a nonwoven fabric 5 produced in this manner preferably has a mass distribution of approximately 25-45 g/m2, preferentially approximately 30-40 g/m2 and most preferentially approximately 35 g/m2, and further preferably a thickness of approximately 0.4 mm to approximately 0.7 mm, preferentially approximately 0.5 mm to approximately 0.6 mm and most preferentially approximately 0.55 mm. Said first layer 12 further preferably has an average of approximately 2 to 10 thickenings/cm2, preferentially approximately 4 to 8 thickenings/cm2, particularly preferentially approximately 5 to 7 thickenings/cm2 and most preferentially approximately 6 thickenings/cm2. The air permeability of said first layer 12 preferably amounts to approximately 5000-7000 l/(m2s), preferentially approximately 5500-6500 l/(m2s) and most preferentially approximately 6000 l/(m2s). The filtration efficiency preferably amounts to approximately 10-20% and preferentially approximately 15%. The inventive effect can also be achieved at the peripheries of the respective range specifications. Additionally, all the cited parameter values are average values which can deviate significantly at individual locations within the first layer 12.
The first layer 12 preferably has an average pore size pursuant to the bubble point test of greater than 80-100 μm. The first fiber section 3 and/or the third fiber section 6 further preferably have an average thickness of 10-40 μm, preferentially 20-30 μm and most preferentially 25 μm. The second fiber section 4 further preferably has an average thickness of 100-1000 μm, preferentially 200-900 μm, preferentially 300-800 μm, more preferentially 400-700 μm and most preferentially 500 μm in the area of a thickening 5.
It was surprisingly discovered that a nonwoven fabric 1 having thickenings 5 disposed therein increases the rigidity of said nonwoven fabric 1. This is in particular due to the fact that when the nonwoven fabric 1 is being produced, the thickenings 5 in the second fiber sections cool more slowly than the fiber strand 2 in the first fiber sections 3 and the third fiber sections 6. Particularly the accumulation of polymer in the second fiber sections 4 of the fiber strand 1 thereby results in the slower cooling.
On the one hand, the cooled thickenings 5 form a reinforcement in the nonwoven fabric 1, on the other hand, further parts of the fiber strand 2 and/or other fiber strands 2 are also at least partly fused with the thickening 5 so that the entire area around a thickening 5 results in a reinforcement of the material. At the same time, however, the thickening 5 remains a part of the fiber strand 2 with similar surface structure and can thus absorb particles to be filtered.
The second layer 13 and the third layer 14 can thereby be produced by means of the same method as the first layer 12, preferably, however, different methods are used to produce layers having different properties. Preferably, the second layer 13 is a relatively coarse nonwoven fabric 1 in order to further stabilize the nonwoven fabric 1 and/or be able to prefilter coarse particles. The third layer 14 is preferably an electret filter, same increasing the particulate matter storage capacity as well as the filtration efficiency by electrostatic binding of particles.
The second layer 13 preferably has a mass distribution of approximately 45-75 g/m2, preferentially approximately 50-70 g/m2, particularly preferentially approximately 55-65 g/m2 and most preferentially approximately 60 g/m2, and further preferably a thickness of approximately 0.5-0.9 mm, preferentially approximately 0.6-0.8 mm and most preferentially approximately 0.7 mm. Further preferably, the second layer 13 has an air permeability of approximately 3000-4000 l/(m2s), preferentially approximately 3250-3750 l/(m2s) and most preferentially approximately 3500 l/(m2s), and further preferably a filtration efficiency of approximately 10-25%, preferentially approximately 15-20% and most preferentially approximately 17.5%. The second layer 13 further preferably has an average pore size pursuant to the bubble point test of greater than 65-120 μm, preferentially 70-90 μm and most preferentially 80 μm.
The third layer 14 preferably has a mass distribution of approximately 35-60 g/m2, preferentially approximately 40-55 g/m2, particularly preferentially approximately 45-50 g/m2 and most preferentially approximately 47.5 g/m2, and preferably a thickness of approximately 0.4-0.7 mm, preferentially approximately 0.5-0.6 mm and most preferentially approximately 0.55 mm. The third layer 14 further preferably has an air permeability of approximately 800-1300 l/(m2s), preferentially approximately 900-1200 l/(m2s) and most preferentially approximately 1000 l/(m2s), and/or a filtration efficiency of approximately 40-80%, preferentially approximately 50-70% and most preferentially approximately 60%. The third layer 14 further preferably has an average pore size pursuant to the bubble point test of greater than 10-60 μm, preferentially 20-50 μm, preferentially 30-40 μm and most preferentially 35 μm.
Together, the three layers 12, 13, 14 preferably have a mass distribution of approximately 105-180 g/m2, preferentially approximately 120-160 g/m2 and most preferentially approximately 140 g/m2, and further preferably a thickness of approximately 1.2-2.5 mm, preferentially approximately 1.3-2.3 mm, particularly preferentially approximately 1.5-2.1 mm, preferentially approximately 1.7-1.9 mm and most preferentially approximately 1.8 mm. The collective air permeability amounts to approximately 500-1300 l/(m2s), preferentially approximately 600-1200 l/(m2s), particularly preferentially approximately 800-1000 l/(m2s) and most preferentially approximately 900 l/(m2s).
The average pore diameter of the three layers amounts preferably to 15-25 μm.
The inventive effect can also be achieved at the peripheries of the respective specifications of range. Additionally, all of the cited parameter values are average values which can deviate significantly at individual locations within the respective layers.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2013 008 402.4 | May 2013 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2014/001290 | 5/13/2014 | WO |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2014/183866 | 11/20/2014 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3557801 | Jamison | Jan 1971 | A |
3825380 | Harding | Jul 1974 | A |
4018678 | Peniston | Apr 1977 | A |
4118531 | Hauser | Oct 1978 | A |
4173504 | Tomioka | Nov 1979 | A |
4551402 | Tamura | Nov 1985 | A |
4592815 | Nakao | Jun 1986 | A |
4714647 | Shipp, Jr. | Dec 1987 | A |
4720252 | Appel | Jan 1988 | A |
4741941 | Englebert | May 1988 | A |
4886527 | Fottinger | Dec 1989 | A |
4983434 | Sassa | Jan 1991 | A |
5066400 | Rocklitz | Nov 1991 | A |
5089202 | Lippold | Feb 1992 | A |
5172585 | Gleissle | Dec 1992 | A |
5283106 | Seiler | Feb 1994 | A |
5350624 | Georger | Sep 1994 | A |
5456069 | Haerle | Oct 1995 | A |
5486410 | Groeger | Jan 1996 | A |
5593768 | Gessner | Jan 1997 | A |
5609947 | Kamei | Mar 1997 | A |
5670044 | Ogata | Sep 1997 | A |
5672399 | Kahlbaugh | Sep 1997 | A |
5681469 | Barboza et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5685757 | Kirsch | Nov 1997 | A |
5714067 | Sorrick | Feb 1998 | A |
5817415 | Chou | Oct 1998 | A |
5877098 | Tanaka | Mar 1999 | A |
6071419 | Beier | Jun 2000 | A |
6110243 | Wnenchak | Aug 2000 | A |
6114017 | Fabbricante | Sep 2000 | A |
6123752 | Wu | Sep 2000 | A |
6146436 | Hollingsworth | Nov 2000 | A |
6315805 | Strauss | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6319865 | Mikami | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6322604 | Midkiff | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6387144 | Jaroszczyk | May 2002 | B1 |
6454989 | Neely | Sep 2002 | B1 |
7527671 | Stuecker | May 2009 | B1 |
7625418 | Choi | Dec 2009 | B1 |
7625433 | Bach | Dec 2009 | B2 |
8021467 | Zimmer | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8211195 | Bass | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8308834 | Smithies | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8715391 | Wang | May 2014 | B2 |
8834762 | Jung | Sep 2014 | B2 |
9242201 | Bao | Jan 2016 | B2 |
20020037678 | Ohata | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020037679 | Bansal | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020095920 | Takagaki | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020122953 | Zhou | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030037675 | Gillingham | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030200991 | Keck | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030201579 | Gordon | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040245171 | Schimmel | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050054255 | Morman | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050129897 | Zhou | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050139544 | Choi | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050235619 | Heinz | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050266760 | Chhabra | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060000196 | Beier | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060014460 | Alexander | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060096263 | Kahlbaugh | May 2006 | A1 |
20060223405 | Pourdeyhimi | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20080022642 | Fox | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080026172 | Stelter | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080120954 | Duello | May 2008 | A1 |
20080166533 | Jones | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080314010 | Smithies | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090044702 | Adamek | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090076473 | Kasai | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090117803 | Jung | May 2009 | A1 |
20090158697 | Magee | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090199715 | Koschak | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100101199 | Veeser | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100107881 | Healey | May 2010 | A1 |
20100119794 | Manstein | May 2010 | A1 |
20100144228 | Branham | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100159770 | Walser | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100186595 | Huang | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100192531 | Bao | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100247404 | Ptak | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100300054 | Cole | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100305687 | Ajji | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100307503 | Iwamoto | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100313757 | Crabtree | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110036353 | Kern | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110180478 | Shah | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20120031063 | Soyama | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120171408 | Turner | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120187593 | Jung | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120309249 | Von Bokern | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130197664 | Ballard | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130269529 | Jung | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130306548 | Kreibig | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140014572 | Mbadinga-Mouanda | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140202123 | Walz | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20150047508 | Sanocki | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150061175 | Jung | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150128545 | Seeberger | May 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101757809 | Jun 2010 | CN |
101410162 | Jan 2012 | CN |
101617072 | Jul 2012 | CN |
2801211 | Jul 1978 | DE |
3916838 | Nov 1990 | DE |
291932 | Jul 1991 | DE |
4123122 | Jan 1993 | DE |
4217195 | Nov 1993 | DE |
3886199 | Apr 1994 | DE |
4443158 | Jun 1996 | DE |
19618758 | Nov 1997 | DE |
69322572 | Dec 1998 | DE |
69320027 | Feb 1999 | DE |
29907699 | Aug 1999 | DE |
19920983 | Nov 2000 | DE |
69914346 | Jul 2001 | DE |
69331065 | Oct 2001 | DE |
10026281 | Dec 2001 | DE |
60100409 | Jul 2003 | DE |
69628752 | Apr 2004 | DE |
10310435 | Jun 2004 | DE |
10257833 | Jul 2004 | DE |
102004036440 | Feb 2005 | DE |
102004048291 | Apr 2006 | DE |
102004060593 | Jun 2006 | DE |
102005026156 | Dec 2006 | DE |
102005055607 | Mar 2007 | DE |
202007005847 | Aug 2007 | DE |
102006013170 | Sep 2007 | DE |
102007011365 | Sep 2008 | DE |
102009026276 | Feb 2010 | DE |
0250005 | Dec 1987 | EP |
0109619 | May 1988 | EP |
0330709 | Sep 1989 | EP |
0379032 | Jul 1990 | EP |
0228512 | Jan 1991 | EP |
0382330 | Jan 1994 | EP |
0590307 | Apr 1994 | EP |
0674035 | Sep 1995 | EP |
0432586 | Jul 1996 | EP |
0537769 | Apr 1998 | EP |
0867216 | Sep 1998 | EP |
0904819 | Mar 1999 | EP |
0695383 | Oct 2001 | EP |
1198279 | Apr 2002 | EP |
1637632 | Mar 2006 | EP |
1790406 | May 2007 | EP |
1970111 | Sep 2008 | EP |
1970111 | Jul 2010 | EP |
2752231 | Jul 2014 | EP |
1866472 | Nov 2016 | EP |
941082 | Nov 1963 | GB |
2404347 | Feb 2005 | GB |
S59141173 | Aug 1984 | JP |
H02264057 | Oct 1990 | JP |
H03137909 | Jun 1991 | JP |
H0440206 | Feb 1992 | JP |
H05321115 | Dec 1993 | JP |
H06346310 | Dec 1994 | JP |
H0813309 | Jan 1996 | JP |
1997503958 | Apr 1997 | JP |
H09220427 | Aug 1997 | JP |
2002219315 | Aug 2002 | JP |
2006341220 | Dec 2006 | JP |
2007170224 | Jul 2007 | JP |
2007265778 | Oct 2007 | JP |
2009011887 | Jan 2009 | JP |
2013052321 | Mar 2013 | JP |
2014184360 | Oct 2014 | JP |
2015107482 | Jun 2015 | JP |
2188693 | Nov 2000 | RU |
2198718 | Oct 2001 | RU |
9216361 | Oct 1992 | WO |
9216361 | Oct 1992 | WO |
9517943 | Jul 1995 | WO |
9517944 | Jul 1995 | WO |
9705306 | Feb 1997 | WO |
0013765 | Mar 2000 | WO |
01086043 | Nov 2001 | WO |
03013732 | Feb 2003 | WO |
2004038078 | May 2004 | WO |
2005060811 | Jul 2005 | WO |
2006002684 | Jan 2006 | WO |
2006049664 | May 2006 | WO |
2005060696 | Jun 2006 | WO |
2007053204 | May 2007 | WO |
2007061457 | May 2007 | WO |
2007061475 | May 2007 | WO |
2007112877 | Oct 2007 | WO |
2008016771 | Feb 2008 | WO |
2007143243 | Feb 2009 | WO |
2011002878 | Jan 2011 | WO |
2011133394 | Oct 2011 | WO |
2012034679 | Mar 2012 | WO |
2012069172 | May 2012 | WO |
2012097973 | Jul 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Dahiya et al., Meltblown Technology, Apr. 2004. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Nov. 26, 2015 for Application No. PCT/EP2014/001290. |
Lewandowski, Zbigniew et al., “The Nonwovens Formation in the Melt-blown Process” Fibres & Textiles in Eastern Europe, 2007. |
Ward, Gregory, “Meltblown Nanofibres for Nonwoven Filtration Applications” Filtration+Separation, Nov. 2001. |
I. M. Hutten, Handbook of Nonwoven Filter Media, pp. 195-203, 2007. |
First Examination report from the India Intellectual Property Office, dated Mar. 13, 2015, 2 pages. |
Office Action in corresponding Japanese application 362967 dated Aug. 11, 2015. |
Office Action in corresponding German Application 102006014236.5 dated Jun. 19, 2015. |
Hutten, Irwin M., “Handbook of Nonwoven Filter Media”, 2007, 12 pages. |
International Search Report for application PCT/EP2007/002650 dated Jan. 16, 2008. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jul. 4, 2012 corresponding to PCT/EP2011/005854. |
International Search Report for PCT/EP2013/001463 dated Jun. 25, 2014. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Dec. 8, 2014 corresponding to PCT/EP2013/001634. |
Examination Report dated Mar. 10, 2015 in corresponding German application No. 10 2012 011 065.0. |
International Search Report for PCT/EP2014/001290 date Mar. 31, 2014. |
Ntemation Search Report and Written opinion for PCT/TH2015/000082 dated Mar. 12, 2016. |
Borealis Brochure; Borealis Polypropylene for Nonwoven Applications; 2004. |
Kathryn C. Dutton; Overbiew and Analysis of the Matblown Process and Parameters; Journal of Textile and Apparel,Technology and Management; vol. 6 Issue 1; Fall 2008; pp. 1-25. |
Meltblown Nanofibres for Nonwovan Filtration Appilcations Filtration+Separation; Nov. 2001. |
Office Action in corresponding Japanese application 2017-547373 dated Sep. 2, 2019. |
First examination report in corresponding German application No. 10 2013 008 402.4 dated Nov. 22, 2021. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160051917 A1 | Feb 2016 | US |