In industrial settings, control systems are used to monitor and control inventories of industrial and chemical processes, and the like. Typically, the control system performs these functions using field devices distributed at key locations in the industrial process and coupled to the control circuitry in the control room by a process control loop. The term “field device” refers to any device that performs a function in a distributed control or process monitoring system, including all devices currently known, or yet to be known, used in the measurement, control and monitoring of industrial processes.
Some field devices include a transducer. A transducer is understood to mean either a device that generates an output signal based on a physical input or that generates a physical output based on an input signal. Typically, a transducer transforms an input into an output having a different form. Types of transducers include various analytical equipment, pressure sensors, thermistors, thermocouples, strain gauges, flow transmitters, positioners, actuators, solenoids, indicator lights, and others.
Typically, each field device also includes communication circuitry that is used for communicating with a process control room, or other circuitry, over a process control loop. In some installations, the process control loop is also used to deliver a regulated current and/or voltage to the field device for powering the field device. The process control loop also carries data, in an analog format, a digital format, or a combination of the two.
Traditionally, analog field devices have been connected to the control room by two-wire process control current loops, with each device connected to the control room by a single two-wire control loop. Typically, a voltage differential is maintained between the two wires within a range of voltages from 12-45 volts for analog mode and 9-50 volts for digital mode. Some analog field devices transmit a signal to the control room by modulating the current running through the current loop to a current proportional to the sensed process variable. Other analog field device can perform an action under the control of the control room by controlling the magnitude of the current through the loop. In addition to, or in the alternative, the process control loop can carry digital signals used for communication with field devices.
In some installations, wireless technologies have begun to be used to communicate with field devices. For example, completely wireless installations are used in which the field device uses a battery, solar cell, or other technique to obtain power without any sort of wired connection. However, the majority of field devices are hardwired to a process control room and do not use wireless communication techniques.
In field devices that operate on as little as 4 mA, providing sufficient power to generate wireless communications is a challenge. If too much power is consumed by generating the wireless communications, the ability for the field device to properly signal over the current loop may be diminished. Thus, there is a need for improved wireless communication capabilities for field devices that operate on process control loops that use an analog current between 4 and 20 mA.
A field device for use in an industrial process control or monitoring system includes terminals configured to connect to a two-wire process control loop configured to carry data and to provide power. In one embodiment, RF circuitry in the field device is configured for radio frequency communication having variable power consumption. In another embodiment, the RF circuitry is coupled to the field device through a separate digital communication bus. A method of modulating the power of RF communication based upon a process communication signal is also provided.
Embodiments of the present invention generally provide a field device with a wireless communication module for one way or bi-directional wireless communication. The wireless communication module can transmit and/or receive an RF signal from a remote device or location. The module's power consumption is dynamically changeable and is powered by a field device.
The housing 62 includes endcap 70 and 72 which can be screwed into housing 62. Endcap 72 includes an RF transparent window 74 configured to align generally with an antenna 26 carried on wireless communication circuitry 22. When attached, endcaps 70 and 72 provide an intrinsically safe enclosure for circuitry within transmitter 14. The materials typically used in endcaps, for example, metal, are not transparent to RF signals. However, RF transparent window 74 allows RF signals to be sent from or received by antenna 26. One example of RF transparent material for use with windows 74 is glass, or the like. However, any appropriate material can be used. The window and housing configuration can help to meet intrinsic safety requirements and provide flame-proof or explosion-proof capabilities. Further, the cavity within housing 62 can be configured to provide a desired radiation pattern of RF signals generated by antenna 26. For example, it may be desirable to have the RF transmission be directional in some implementations, or omni-directional in others. In other implementations, cover 62 may be lengthened to provide an additional interior cavity for placement of wireless communication circuitry 22.
Wireless communication circuitry 22 interacts with external wireless devices via antenna 26. Depending upon the application, wireless communication circuitry 22 may be adapted to communicate in accordance with any suitable wireless communication protocol including, but not limited to: wireless networking technologies (such as IEEE 802.15.4 or IEEE 802.11b wireless access points and wireless networking devices built by Linksys of Irvine, Calif.), cellular or digital networking technologies (such as Microburst® by Aeris Communications Inc. of San Jose, Calif.), ultra wide band, free space optics, Global System for Mobile Communications (GSM), General Packet Radio Services (GPRS), Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA), spread spectrum technology, infrared communications techniques, SMS (Short Messaging Service/text messaging), or any other suitable wireless technology. Further, known data collision technology can be employed such that multiple units can coexist within wireless operating rage of one another. Such collision prevention can include using a number of different radio-frequency channels and/or spread spectrum technologies.
While
In accordance with embodiments of the present invention, wireless communication circuitry 22 is configured to draw varying amounts of electrical power based upon how much power is available to circuitry 22 from field device 14. For example, as set forth above, field devices operating on some process control loops may be required to operate on as low as 4 mA. In such instances, there may be very little, if any additional electrical energy to power wireless communication. Such a situation would exist as long as the conditions requiring the process variable signal to be 4 mA (such as indicating a zero scale or low rail process variable value) is present. Accordingly, such condition may exist for hours or even days. Embodiments of the present invention are generally able to accommodate the significantly variable amounts of excess energy useable for wireless communications. In one embodiment, excess energy that is available when the process control loop current is at a higher value is stored instead of merely discarded. This stored energy can then be used later when the current signal is at its lowest value. The energy may be stored in any suitable device including rechargeable batteries and/or suitable capacitors.
In another embodiment, the actual operation of wireless communication circuitry 22 is varied based upon available power. For example, wireless communication circuitry 22 may go into a sleep mode for a period of time when field device 14 loop current is near 4 mA and little excess power is available as opposed to when the field device loop current is near 12 mA and there is generous excess power available for circuitry 22. Another example of modifying the operation of wireless communication circuitry 22 is changing the communication rate of wireless communication circuitry 22. For example, the communication rate of wireless circuitry 22 may be set or determined as a function of the amount of available excess power that can be delivered to wireless communication circuitry 22. One example of such a function is where the communication rate of wireless communication circuitry 22 is directly proportional to the amount of excess power. Additionally, field device 14 may know or be able to predict how much excess power is available, and it is contemplated that field device 14 can set, via communication with wireless communication circuitry 22, the communication rate of circuitry 22.
In order to simplify process wiring and installation, it is generally preferred that wireless communication module 22 be powered solely from energy available from field device 14. Further still, it is preferred that wireless communication circuitry 22 be powered by virtue of, or through, digital communication bus 100. Communication bus 100 can be any suitable digital communication bus including Controller Area Network (CAN) or Local Interconnect Network (LIN) bus; a Serial Communication Interface (SCI) bus; a Serial Peripheral Interface (SPI) bus; or an I2C bus.
The current required to make a single process measurement while keeping the 4-20 mA electronics and sensor circuitry within field device 14 functioning often requires up to 3.6 mA, which is the maximum limit allowed to meet NAMUR alarm levels. HART-based transmitters use +/−0.5 mA for signaling on the two wire loop, so only 3.1 mA of the 3.6 mA limit should be allocated for the operating current field device 14. In accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, field device 14 employs communication power limit module 112 to limit the electrical power provided for digital communications over digital communication bus 100, and accordingly through wireless communication circuitry 22. For example, when there is 4.0 mA of loop current, 0.7 mA of electrical energy is made available to digital communication bus 100. When there is 6.0 mA of loop current, 1.70 mA is made available to wireless communication circuitry 22 through digital communication bus 100.
As illustrated in
Generally, any excess current available above the minimum current required to operate field device 14 can be provided to wireless communication circuitry 22 through digital communication bus 100. Additionally, in embodiments where field device 14 communicates digitally upon process control loop 16, even fleeting increases and decreases in the current, such as those required for digital communication signaling, can be used to increase or decrease the power available for wireless communication.
Although the present invention has been described with reference to preferred embodiments, workers skilled in the art will recognize that changes may be made in form and detail without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. As used herein, Radio Frequency (RF) can comprise electromagnetic transmissions of any frequency and is not limited to a particular group of frequencies, range of frequencies or any other limitation.
The present application is based on and claims the benefit of U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 60/694,201, filed Jun. 27, 2005, the content of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2533339 | Willenborg | Dec 1950 | A |
2883489 | Eadie, Jr. et al. | Apr 1959 | A |
3012432 | Moore et al. | Dec 1961 | A |
3218863 | Calvert | Nov 1965 | A |
3232712 | Stearns | Feb 1966 | A |
3249833 | Vosteen | May 1966 | A |
3374112 | Danon | Mar 1968 | A |
3557621 | Ferran | Jan 1971 | A |
3612851 | Fowler | Oct 1971 | A |
3697835 | Satori | Oct 1972 | A |
D225743 | Seltzer | Jan 1973 | S |
3742450 | Weller | Jun 1973 | A |
3808480 | Johnston | Apr 1974 | A |
3924219 | Braun | Dec 1975 | A |
4008619 | Alcaide et al. | Feb 1977 | A |
4158217 | Bell | Jun 1979 | A |
4168518 | Lee | Sep 1979 | A |
4177496 | Bell et al. | Dec 1979 | A |
4227419 | Park | Oct 1980 | A |
4287553 | Braunlich | Sep 1981 | A |
4322775 | Delatorre | Mar 1982 | A |
4336567 | Anastasia | Jun 1982 | A |
4358814 | Lee et al. | Nov 1982 | A |
4370890 | Frick | Feb 1983 | A |
4389895 | Rud, Jr. | Jun 1983 | A |
4422125 | Antonazzi et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
4422335 | Ohnesorge et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
4434451 | Delatorre | Feb 1984 | A |
4455874 | Paros | Jun 1984 | A |
4458537 | Bell et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
4475047 | Ebert, Jr. | Oct 1984 | A |
4490773 | Moffatt | Dec 1984 | A |
4542436 | Carusillo | Sep 1985 | A |
4562742 | Bell | Jan 1986 | A |
4590466 | Wiklund et al. | May 1986 | A |
4670733 | Bell | Jun 1987 | A |
4701938 | Bell | Oct 1987 | A |
4704607 | Teather et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4749993 | Szabo et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4785669 | Benson et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4860232 | Lee et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4875369 | Delatorre | Oct 1989 | A |
4878012 | Schulte et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4926674 | Fossum et al. | May 1990 | A |
4951174 | Grantham et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4977480 | Nishihara | Dec 1990 | A |
4982412 | Gross | Jan 1991 | A |
5025202 | Ishii et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5060295 | Borras et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5094109 | Dean et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
D331370 | Williams | Dec 1992 | S |
5168419 | Delatorre | Dec 1992 | A |
5194819 | Briefer | Mar 1993 | A |
5230250 | Delatorre | Jul 1993 | A |
5233875 | Obermeier et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
D345107 | Williams | Mar 1994 | S |
5329818 | Frick et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5492016 | Pinto et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5495769 | Broden et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5506757 | Brorby | Apr 1996 | A |
5542300 | Lee | Aug 1996 | A |
5554809 | Tobita et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5606513 | Louwagie et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5610552 | Schlesinger et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5637802 | Frick et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5642301 | Warrior et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5656782 | Powell, II et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5665899 | Willcox | Sep 1997 | A |
5682476 | Tapperson et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5705978 | Frick et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5757608 | Bernot et al. | May 1998 | A |
5787120 | Louagie et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5793963 | Tapperson et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5851083 | Palan | Dec 1998 | A |
5870695 | Brown et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5872494 | Palan et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5899962 | Louwagie et al. | May 1999 | A |
5911162 | Denner | Jun 1999 | A |
5954526 | Smith | Sep 1999 | A |
5978658 | Shoji | Nov 1999 | A |
5992240 | Tsuruoka et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6038927 | Karas | Mar 2000 | A |
6079276 | Frick et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
D439177 | Fandrey et al. | Mar 2001 | S |
D439178 | Fandrey et al. | Mar 2001 | S |
D439179 | Fandrey et al. | Mar 2001 | S |
D439180 | Fandrey et al. | Mar 2001 | S |
D439181 | Fandrey et al. | Mar 2001 | S |
D441672 | Fandrey et al. | May 2001 | S |
6236096 | Chang et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6295875 | Frick et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6338283 | Blazquez Navarro | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6429786 | Bansemir et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6441747 | Khair et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6457367 | Behm et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6484107 | Roper et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6487912 | Behm et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6504489 | Westfield et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6508131 | Frick | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6510740 | Behm et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6511337 | Fandrey et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
D471829 | Dennis et al. | Mar 2003 | S |
D472831 | Dennis et al. | Apr 2003 | S |
6546805 | Fandrey et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6553076 | Huang | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6568279 | Behm et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6571132 | Davis et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6574515 | Kirkpatrick et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6593857 | Roper et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6609427 | Westfield et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6662662 | Nord et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6711446 | Kirkpatrick et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6765968 | Nelson et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6774814 | Hilleary | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6839546 | Hedtke | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6891838 | Petite et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6898980 | Behm et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6907383 | Eryurek et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6995685 | Randall | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7010294 | Pyotsia et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7058542 | Hauhia et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7109883 | Trimble et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7233745 | Loechner | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7262693 | Karschnia et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7271679 | Lundberg et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
20010025349 | Sharood et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20020005713 | Klofer et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020011115 | Frick | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020029130 | Eryurek et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020065631 | Loechner | May 2002 | A1 |
20020082799 | Pramanik | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020095520 | Wettstein et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020097031 | Cook et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020105968 | Pruzan et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020163323 | Kasai et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030171827 | Keyes, IV et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030204371 | Sciamanna | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040086021 | Litwin | May 2004 | A1 |
20040124854 | Slezak | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040184517 | Westfield et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040199681 | Hedtke | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040203434 | Karschnia et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040211456 | Brown et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040259533 | Nixon et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050017602 | Arms et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050056106 | Nelson et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050072239 | Longsdorf et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050130605 | Karschnia et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050164684 | Chen et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050201349 | Budampati | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050240784 | Sugasawa | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050245291 | Brown et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050276233 | Shepard et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050281215 | Budampati et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050289276 | Karschnia et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060002368 | Budampati et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060036404 | Wiklund et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060092039 | Saito et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060116102 | Brown et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060148410 | Nelson et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060181406 | Petite et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060194547 | Davis | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060227729 | Budampati et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060274644 | Budampati et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060274671 | Budampati et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060287001 | Budampati et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070030816 | Kolavennu | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070030832 | Gonia et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070229255 | Loechner | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070233283 | Chen | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070237137 | McLaughlin | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070280144 | Hodson et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070280178 | Hodson et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070280286 | Hodson et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070280287 | Samudrala et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070282463 | Hodson et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070288204 | Gienke et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3340834 | May 1985 | DE |
196 22 295 | May 1996 | DE |
101 04 582 | Oct 2001 | DE |
102 21 931 | May 2002 | DE |
0 518 916 | Feb 1991 | EP |
0 524 550 | Jan 1993 | EP |
0 895 209 | Feb 1999 | EP |
1202145 | Oct 2000 | EP |
1 202 145 | May 2002 | EP |
1 192 614 | Jan 2003 | EP |
1 293 853 | Mar 2003 | EP |
02067794 | Jul 1990 | JP |
2000-304148 | Nov 2000 | JP |
2003042881 | Feb 2003 | JP |
2003051894 | Feb 2003 | JP |
2003-070079 | Mar 2003 | JP |
2003134261 | May 2003 | JP |
2004021877 | Jan 2004 | JP |
2004-317593 | Nov 2004 | JP |
2005-207648 | Aug 2005 | JP |
WO 9113417 | Sep 1991 | WO |
WO 9507522 | Mar 1995 | WO |
WO 9953286 | Oct 1999 | WO |
WO 03023536 | Mar 2003 | WO |
WO 03089881 | Oct 2003 | WO |
WO 2004023423 | Mar 2004 | WO |
WO 2004094892 | Nov 2004 | WO |
WO 2005060482 | Jul 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Office Action from Russian Patent Office in Russian U.S. Appl. No. 2006145434. |
Office Action from U.S. Patent Office in U.S. Appl. No. 11/028,486. |
First Communication issued by the European Patent Office in German Application No. 06774208.0. |
XP 002400076. |
“Wireless R&D Aims to Boos Traffic,” by M. Moore, InTech with Industrial Computing, Feb. 2002, pp. 40-41. |
“System Checks Farawy Machines' Health,” by J. Strothman, InTech with Industrial Computing, Feb. 2002, pp. 42-43. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report or the Declaration—PCT/US03/10403. |
“Wireless Management Toolkit XYR 5000”, by Honeywell International Inc., Phoenix, Arizona, 3 pgs., Oct. 2003. |
“Wireless Analog Input Transmitters XYR 5000”, by Honeywell International Inc., Phoenix, Arizona, 4 pgs., Oct. 2003. |
“Quad Analog Output Module Installation and User's Manual”, by Honeywell International Inc., Phoenix, Arizona, pgs. Ii, iii, iv and 1-12, Dec. 2003. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of Application No. PCT/US2005/015848, filed May 5, 2005. |
“Wireless Dual Analog Input Interface Transmitter Installation and User's Manual”, by Honeywell International Inc., Phoenix, Arizona, pp. Ii-vi and 7-43, Dec. 2003. |
“XYR 5000 Wireless Dual Analog Input Interface, Model Selection Guide”, by Honeywell International Inc., Phoenix, Arizona, Dec. 2003. |
“Wireless Measure, Monitor & Control”, by Accutech, 4 pgs. May 2003. |
“Wireless Instrumentation, Multi-Input Field Unit”, by Accutech, 2 pgs., Dec. 2003. |
“Quad Analog Output Module”, by Accutech, 1 pg. Dec. 2003. |
3 Pages from Website www.chemicalprocessing.com, Apr. 2004. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion—PCT/US2005/021757. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US 03/27561, filed Mar. 9, 2003, dated Jun. 15, 2004. |
2002 Microchip Technology Inc., “Stand-Alone CAN Controller with SPI™ Interface,” pp. 1-75, Mar. 1, 2002. |
Rosemount Reference Manual 00809-0100-4022,Rev AA, Jul. 2002, “Model 4600 Oil & Gas Panel Transmitter,” 65 pages. |
Transmitter Schematic, Sold Jul. 2002, 5 pages. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2005/007328 filed Mar. 7, 2005. Date of Mailing: Jan. 12, 2006. |
4 Pages from Website http://content.honeywell.com/imc/eznews/eznews0403/news.htm, 2004. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2006/025206 filed Jun. 27, 2006. |
“Mechatronic Drives in Mobile Hydraulics,” Internet Article, Soncebox News. No. 4, Oct. 2004. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/028,486 dated May 9, 2008. |
First Office Action for Chinese patent application 200680015575.4, filed Jun. 27, 2006. |
Official Action for Russian patent application No. 2008103014, filed Jun. 27, 2006. |
Second Office Action for Chinese patent application No. 200680015575.4, dated Sep. 25, 2009. |
Third Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 200680015575.4 dated May 11, 2010. |
First Office Action (Notification of Reasons for Rejection) for Japanese patent application No. 2008-518521 dated Aug. 24, 2010. |
First Examination Report from the related Indian patent application No. 9/MUMNP/2008 dated Jan. 3, 2012. 1 page. |
Decision to Refuse from a corresponding European patent application No. 06774208.0 dated Apr. 2, 2012. |
Provision of the Minutes from the corresponding European patent application No. 06774208.0 dated Apr. 2, 2012. |
Fourth Office Action for Chinese patent application No. 200680015575.4 dated Jun. 9, 2011. |
Summons to attend Oral Proceedings for corresponding European patent application No. 06774208.0 dated Nov. 7, 2011. |
Office Action from the corresponding Canadian patent application No. 2602758 dated Oct. 10, 2012. 5 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060290328 A1 | Dec 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60694201 | Jun 2005 | US |