Field device with dynamically adjustable power consumption radio frequency communication

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8452255
  • Patent Number
    8,452,255
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, June 27, 2006
    18 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, May 28, 2013
    11 years ago
Abstract
A field device for use in an industrial process control or monitoring system includes terminals configured to connect to a two-wire process control loop configured to carry data and to provide power. In one embodiment, RF circuitry in the field device is configured for radio frequency communication having variable power consumption. In another embodiment, the RF circuitry is coupled to the field device through a separate digital communication bus. A method of modulating the power of RF communication based upon a process communication signal is also provided.
Description
BACKGROUND

In industrial settings, control systems are used to monitor and control inventories of industrial and chemical processes, and the like. Typically, the control system performs these functions using field devices distributed at key locations in the industrial process and coupled to the control circuitry in the control room by a process control loop. The term “field device” refers to any device that performs a function in a distributed control or process monitoring system, including all devices currently known, or yet to be known, used in the measurement, control and monitoring of industrial processes.


Some field devices include a transducer. A transducer is understood to mean either a device that generates an output signal based on a physical input or that generates a physical output based on an input signal. Typically, a transducer transforms an input into an output having a different form. Types of transducers include various analytical equipment, pressure sensors, thermistors, thermocouples, strain gauges, flow transmitters, positioners, actuators, solenoids, indicator lights, and others.


Typically, each field device also includes communication circuitry that is used for communicating with a process control room, or other circuitry, over a process control loop. In some installations, the process control loop is also used to deliver a regulated current and/or voltage to the field device for powering the field device. The process control loop also carries data, in an analog format, a digital format, or a combination of the two.


Traditionally, analog field devices have been connected to the control room by two-wire process control current loops, with each device connected to the control room by a single two-wire control loop. Typically, a voltage differential is maintained between the two wires within a range of voltages from 12-45 volts for analog mode and 9-50 volts for digital mode. Some analog field devices transmit a signal to the control room by modulating the current running through the current loop to a current proportional to the sensed process variable. Other analog field device can perform an action under the control of the control room by controlling the magnitude of the current through the loop. In addition to, or in the alternative, the process control loop can carry digital signals used for communication with field devices.


In some installations, wireless technologies have begun to be used to communicate with field devices. For example, completely wireless installations are used in which the field device uses a battery, solar cell, or other technique to obtain power without any sort of wired connection. However, the majority of field devices are hardwired to a process control room and do not use wireless communication techniques.


In field devices that operate on as little as 4 mA, providing sufficient power to generate wireless communications is a challenge. If too much power is consumed by generating the wireless communications, the ability for the field device to properly signal over the current loop may be diminished. Thus, there is a need for improved wireless communication capabilities for field devices that operate on process control loops that use an analog current between 4 and 20 mA.


SUMMARY

A field device for use in an industrial process control or monitoring system includes terminals configured to connect to a two-wire process control loop configured to carry data and to provide power. In one embodiment, RF circuitry in the field device is configured for radio frequency communication having variable power consumption. In another embodiment, the RF circuitry is coupled to the field device through a separate digital communication bus. A method of modulating the power of RF communication based upon a process communication signal is also provided.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a diagrammatic view of a process control and/or monitoring system in which embodiments of the present invention are particularly useful.



FIG. 2 is a simplified cutaway partially exploded view of a pressure transmitter.



FIG. 3 illustrates a field device operably coupled to a process control loop and to wireless communication circuitry.



FIG. 4 is a diagrammatic view of a portion of field device circuitry within a field device in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Embodiments of the present invention generally provide a field device with a wireless communication module for one way or bi-directional wireless communication. The wireless communication module can transmit and/or receive an RF signal from a remote device or location. The module's power consumption is dynamically changeable and is powered by a field device.



FIG. 1 is a diagrammatic view of a process control and/or monitoring system 10 in which embodiments of the present invention are particularly useful. System 10 includes control room 12 that is coupled to field device 14 over a two-wire process control loop 16. Field device 14 is operably coupled to a process fluid container, illustrated diagrammatically as pipe 18, and is configured to determine a process variable relative to the process fluid within pipe 18 and convey information related to the process variable over process control loop 16.



FIG. 2 is a simplified cutaway partially exploded view of pressure transmitter 14, which is one example of a field device. Pressure transmitter 14 couples to two-wire process control loop 16 and includes transmitter housing 62. Process control loop 16 couples to terminals 56 carried on terminal board 58. A pressure sensor 64 provides one example of a transducer and is configured to couple to a process fitting to measure a differential pressure occurring in the process fluid. The output from sensor 64 is provided to measurement circuitry 66 which couples to field device circuit 68. Wireless communication circuitry 22 couples to field device circuitry 68 and may, in some embodiments, couple to process control loop 16.


The housing 62 includes endcap 70 and 72 which can be screwed into housing 62. Endcap 72 includes an RF transparent window 74 configured to align generally with an antenna 26 carried on wireless communication circuitry 22. When attached, endcaps 70 and 72 provide an intrinsically safe enclosure for circuitry within transmitter 14. The materials typically used in endcaps, for example, metal, are not transparent to RF signals. However, RF transparent window 74 allows RF signals to be sent from or received by antenna 26. One example of RF transparent material for use with windows 74 is glass, or the like. However, any appropriate material can be used. The window and housing configuration can help to meet intrinsic safety requirements and provide flame-proof or explosion-proof capabilities. Further, the cavity within housing 62 can be configured to provide a desired radiation pattern of RF signals generated by antenna 26. For example, it may be desirable to have the RF transmission be directional in some implementations, or omni-directional in others. In other implementations, cover 62 may be lengthened to provide an additional interior cavity for placement of wireless communication circuitry 22.


Wireless communication circuitry 22 interacts with external wireless devices via antenna 26. Depending upon the application, wireless communication circuitry 22 may be adapted to communicate in accordance with any suitable wireless communication protocol including, but not limited to: wireless networking technologies (such as IEEE 802.15.4 or IEEE 802.11b wireless access points and wireless networking devices built by Linksys of Irvine, Calif.), cellular or digital networking technologies (such as Microburst® by Aeris Communications Inc. of San Jose, Calif.), ultra wide band, free space optics, Global System for Mobile Communications (GSM), General Packet Radio Services (GPRS), Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA), spread spectrum technology, infrared communications techniques, SMS (Short Messaging Service/text messaging), or any other suitable wireless technology. Further, known data collision technology can be employed such that multiple units can coexist within wireless operating rage of one another. Such collision prevention can include using a number of different radio-frequency channels and/or spread spectrum technologies.


While FIG. 2 illustrates wireless communication circuitry 22 operably coupled to field device circuitry 68 within field device 14, it is expressly contemplated that wireless communication circuitry 22 may be located remotely therefrom and coupled to field device 14 through a suitable digital communication bus.



FIG. 3 is a diagrammatic view of field device 14 operably coupled to process control loop 16 and to wireless communication circuitry 22, which is disposed remotely from field device 14 through digital communication bus 100. Digital communication bus 100 is preferably a bi-directional bus, but may be unidirectional in instances where bi-directional communication is not necessary, or desired.


In accordance with embodiments of the present invention, wireless communication circuitry 22 is configured to draw varying amounts of electrical power based upon how much power is available to circuitry 22 from field device 14. For example, as set forth above, field devices operating on some process control loops may be required to operate on as low as 4 mA. In such instances, there may be very little, if any additional electrical energy to power wireless communication. Such a situation would exist as long as the conditions requiring the process variable signal to be 4 mA (such as indicating a zero scale or low rail process variable value) is present. Accordingly, such condition may exist for hours or even days. Embodiments of the present invention are generally able to accommodate the significantly variable amounts of excess energy useable for wireless communications. In one embodiment, excess energy that is available when the process control loop current is at a higher value is stored instead of merely discarded. This stored energy can then be used later when the current signal is at its lowest value. The energy may be stored in any suitable device including rechargeable batteries and/or suitable capacitors.


In another embodiment, the actual operation of wireless communication circuitry 22 is varied based upon available power. For example, wireless communication circuitry 22 may go into a sleep mode for a period of time when field device 14 loop current is near 4 mA and little excess power is available as opposed to when the field device loop current is near 12 mA and there is generous excess power available for circuitry 22. Another example of modifying the operation of wireless communication circuitry 22 is changing the communication rate of wireless communication circuitry 22. For example, the communication rate of wireless circuitry 22 may be set or determined as a function of the amount of available excess power that can be delivered to wireless communication circuitry 22. One example of such a function is where the communication rate of wireless communication circuitry 22 is directly proportional to the amount of excess power. Additionally, field device 14 may know or be able to predict how much excess power is available, and it is contemplated that field device 14 can set, via communication with wireless communication circuitry 22, the communication rate of circuitry 22.


In order to simplify process wiring and installation, it is generally preferred that wireless communication module 22 be powered solely from energy available from field device 14. Further still, it is preferred that wireless communication circuitry 22 be powered by virtue of, or through, digital communication bus 100. Communication bus 100 can be any suitable digital communication bus including Controller Area Network (CAN) or Local Interconnect Network (LIN) bus; a Serial Communication Interface (SCI) bus; a Serial Peripheral Interface (SPI) bus; or an I2C bus.



FIG. 4 is a diagrammatic view of a portion of field device circuitry 68 within field device 14 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. Field device circuitry 68 includes a digital modem 102 that allows field device 14 to communicate digitally over process control loop 16. In one embodiment, the digital communication is in accordance with the Highway Addressable Remote Transducer (HART®) protocol. Additionally, circuitry 68 includes shunt control module 104 that allows field device 14 to set the amount of current flowing between terminals 56H and 56L to a value between 4 and 20 mA in order to convey process variable information. Field device 14 preferably includes a pair of terminals 106, 108 through which digital communication bus 100 couples wireless communication circuitry 22. Field device 14 also preferably includes communication physical layer 110 that provides for communication in accordance with one of the digital communication bus options listed above. Additionally, field device 14 includes communication power limit module 112 that is operably coupled to high voltage rail 114 and to loop terminal 56L. Communication power limit module 112 is operably coupled to shunt control 104 such that power to the communication physical layer 110 is based upon current drawn by field device 14. As illustrated in FIG. 4, wireless communication circuitry 22 is coupled to terminals 106 and 108 via communication bus 100. As set forth above, wireless communication circuitry 22 can be disposed within field device 14, or located remotely therefrom.


The current required to make a single process measurement while keeping the 4-20 mA electronics and sensor circuitry within field device 14 functioning often requires up to 3.6 mA, which is the maximum limit allowed to meet NAMUR alarm levels. HART-based transmitters use +/−0.5 mA for signaling on the two wire loop, so only 3.1 mA of the 3.6 mA limit should be allocated for the operating current field device 14. In accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, field device 14 employs communication power limit module 112 to limit the electrical power provided for digital communications over digital communication bus 100, and accordingly through wireless communication circuitry 22. For example, when there is 4.0 mA of loop current, 0.7 mA of electrical energy is made available to digital communication bus 100. When there is 6.0 mA of loop current, 1.70 mA is made available to wireless communication circuitry 22 through digital communication bus 100.


As illustrated in FIG. 4, terminal 106 of digital communication bus 100 can be directly coupled to loop terminal 56L. In this embodiment, one of the wires of the two-wire 4-20 mA loop and the two-wire digital communication bus 100 are common. In this instance, the common line of digital communication bus 100 could in fact be coupled directly to the negative or low voltage line of the process communication loop and the interconnection between wireless communication circuitry 22 and field device 14 could be effected via a single wire coupled to terminal 108. In accordance with one embodiment of the present invention, digital communication bus 100 is a controller area network (CAN) bus and circuitry of field device 14 can be in accordance with that found in United States Patent Application Publication Serial Number 2004/0184517 A1, published Sep. 23, 2004 entitled TWO WIRE TRANSMITTER WITH ISOLATED CAN OUTPUT.


Generally, any excess current available above the minimum current required to operate field device 14 can be provided to wireless communication circuitry 22 through digital communication bus 100. Additionally, in embodiments where field device 14 communicates digitally upon process control loop 16, even fleeting increases and decreases in the current, such as those required for digital communication signaling, can be used to increase or decrease the power available for wireless communication.


Although the present invention has been described with reference to preferred embodiments, workers skilled in the art will recognize that changes may be made in form and detail without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. As used herein, Radio Frequency (RF) can comprise electromagnetic transmissions of any frequency and is not limited to a particular group of frequencies, range of frequencies or any other limitation.

Claims
  • 1. A field device comprising: a plurality of electrical terminals coupled to conductors of a process control loop;field device circuitry including a digital modem allowing the field device to communicate digitally over the process control loop;a shunt control module operably coupled between the plurality of electrical terminals and configured to control amount of current flowing therethrough;a communication power limit module operably coupled to the shunt control module to limit power provided to a digital communication bus based on the amount of current;wherein the digital communication bus is operably coupled between the field device circuitry and wireless communication circuitry, the wireless communication circuitry being configured to operate at varying power levels based upon excess power available from the field device, wherein operation of the wireless communication circuitry is configured to be modified based upon the excess power available from the field device to dynamically change a power consumption rate of the wireless communication circuitry; andwherein the wireless communication circuitry goes to a sleep mode for a period of time when excess power available from the field device is at a minimum.
  • 2. The field device of claim 1, wherein the wireless communication circuitry is disposed within the field device.
  • 3. The field device of claim 1, wherein the wireless communication circuitry is located remotely from the field device.
  • 4. The field device of claim 1, wherein the digital communication bus is a Controller Area Network bus.
  • 5. The field device of claim 4, wherein the wireless communication circuitry is coupled to the field device through a single conductor.
  • 6. The field device of claim 1, wherein the digital communication bus is a Local Interconnect Network (LIN) bus.
  • 7. The field device of claim 1, wherein the digital communication bus is a Serial Communication Interface (SCI) bus.
  • 8. The field device of claim 1, wherein the digital communication bus is a Serial Peripheral Interface (SPI) bus.
  • 9. The field device of claim 1, wherein the digital communication bus is an I2C bus.
  • 10. The field device of claim 1, and further comprising an energy storage device.
  • 11. The field device of claim 1, wherein the field device is a process variable transmitter.
  • 12. The field device of claim 1, wherein the wireless communication circuitry communication rate is proportional to the amount of current flowing through the shunt control module.
  • 13. The field device of claim 1, wherein the wireless communication circuitry communication rate is a function of excess power available from the field device.
  • 14. The field device of claim 13, wherein the wireless communication circuitry communication rate is proportional to the excess power.
  • 15. The field device of claim 1, wherein the amount of current flowing through the plurality of terminals, and determined by the shunt control module, is utilized to power the field device.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

The present application is based on and claims the benefit of U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 60/694,201, filed Jun. 27, 2005, the content of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (177)
Number Name Date Kind
2533339 Willenborg Dec 1950 A
2883489 Eadie, Jr. et al. Apr 1959 A
3012432 Moore et al. Dec 1961 A
3218863 Calvert Nov 1965 A
3232712 Stearns Feb 1966 A
3249833 Vosteen May 1966 A
3374112 Danon Mar 1968 A
3557621 Ferran Jan 1971 A
3612851 Fowler Oct 1971 A
3697835 Satori Oct 1972 A
D225743 Seltzer Jan 1973 S
3742450 Weller Jun 1973 A
3808480 Johnston Apr 1974 A
3924219 Braun Dec 1975 A
4008619 Alcaide et al. Feb 1977 A
4158217 Bell Jun 1979 A
4168518 Lee Sep 1979 A
4177496 Bell et al. Dec 1979 A
4227419 Park Oct 1980 A
4287553 Braunlich Sep 1981 A
4322775 Delatorre Mar 1982 A
4336567 Anastasia Jun 1982 A
4358814 Lee et al. Nov 1982 A
4370890 Frick Feb 1983 A
4389895 Rud, Jr. Jun 1983 A
4422125 Antonazzi et al. Dec 1983 A
4422335 Ohnesorge et al. Dec 1983 A
4434451 Delatorre Feb 1984 A
4455874 Paros Jun 1984 A
4458537 Bell et al. Jul 1984 A
4475047 Ebert, Jr. Oct 1984 A
4490773 Moffatt Dec 1984 A
4542436 Carusillo Sep 1985 A
4562742 Bell Jan 1986 A
4590466 Wiklund et al. May 1986 A
4670733 Bell Jun 1987 A
4701938 Bell Oct 1987 A
4704607 Teather et al. Nov 1987 A
4749993 Szabo et al. Jun 1988 A
4785669 Benson et al. Nov 1988 A
4860232 Lee et al. Aug 1989 A
4875369 Delatorre Oct 1989 A
4878012 Schulte et al. Oct 1989 A
4926674 Fossum et al. May 1990 A
4951174 Grantham et al. Aug 1990 A
4977480 Nishihara Dec 1990 A
4982412 Gross Jan 1991 A
5025202 Ishii et al. Jun 1991 A
5060295 Borras et al. Oct 1991 A
5094109 Dean et al. Mar 1992 A
D331370 Williams Dec 1992 S
5168419 Delatorre Dec 1992 A
5194819 Briefer Mar 1993 A
5230250 Delatorre Jul 1993 A
5233875 Obermeier et al. Aug 1993 A
D345107 Williams Mar 1994 S
5329818 Frick et al. Jul 1994 A
5492016 Pinto et al. Feb 1996 A
5495769 Broden et al. Mar 1996 A
5506757 Brorby Apr 1996 A
5542300 Lee Aug 1996 A
5554809 Tobita et al. Sep 1996 A
5606513 Louwagie et al. Feb 1997 A
5610552 Schlesinger et al. Mar 1997 A
5637802 Frick et al. Jun 1997 A
5642301 Warrior et al. Jun 1997 A
5656782 Powell, II et al. Aug 1997 A
5665899 Willcox Sep 1997 A
5682476 Tapperson et al. Oct 1997 A
5705978 Frick et al. Jan 1998 A
5757608 Bernot et al. May 1998 A
5787120 Louagie et al. Jul 1998 A
5793963 Tapperson et al. Aug 1998 A
5851083 Palan Dec 1998 A
5870695 Brown et al. Feb 1999 A
5872494 Palan et al. Feb 1999 A
5899962 Louwagie et al. May 1999 A
5911162 Denner Jun 1999 A
5954526 Smith Sep 1999 A
5978658 Shoji Nov 1999 A
5992240 Tsuruoka et al. Nov 1999 A
6038927 Karas Mar 2000 A
6079276 Frick et al. Jun 2000 A
D439177 Fandrey et al. Mar 2001 S
D439178 Fandrey et al. Mar 2001 S
D439179 Fandrey et al. Mar 2001 S
D439180 Fandrey et al. Mar 2001 S
D439181 Fandrey et al. Mar 2001 S
D441672 Fandrey et al. May 2001 S
6236096 Chang et al. May 2001 B1
6295875 Frick et al. Oct 2001 B1
6338283 Blazquez Navarro Jan 2002 B1
6429786 Bansemir et al. Aug 2002 B1
6441747 Khair et al. Aug 2002 B1
6457367 Behm et al. Oct 2002 B1
6484107 Roper et al. Nov 2002 B1
6487912 Behm et al. Dec 2002 B1
6504489 Westfield et al. Jan 2003 B1
6508131 Frick Jan 2003 B2
6510740 Behm et al. Jan 2003 B1
6511337 Fandrey et al. Jan 2003 B1
D471829 Dennis et al. Mar 2003 S
D472831 Dennis et al. Apr 2003 S
6546805 Fandrey et al. Apr 2003 B2
6553076 Huang Apr 2003 B1
6568279 Behm et al. May 2003 B2
6571132 Davis et al. May 2003 B1
6574515 Kirkpatrick et al. Jun 2003 B1
6593857 Roper et al. Jul 2003 B1
6609427 Westfield et al. Aug 2003 B1
6662662 Nord et al. Dec 2003 B1
6711446 Kirkpatrick et al. Mar 2004 B2
6765968 Nelson et al. Jul 2004 B1
6774814 Hilleary Aug 2004 B2
6839546 Hedtke Jan 2005 B2
6891838 Petite et al. May 2005 B1
6898980 Behm et al. May 2005 B2
6907383 Eryurek et al. Jun 2005 B2
6995685 Randall Feb 2006 B2
7010294 Pyotsia et al. Mar 2006 B1
7058542 Hauhia et al. Jun 2006 B2
7109883 Trimble et al. Sep 2006 B2
7233745 Loechner Jun 2007 B2
7262693 Karschnia et al. Aug 2007 B2
7271679 Lundberg et al. Sep 2007 B2
20010025349 Sharood et al. Sep 2001 A1
20020005713 Klofer et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020011115 Frick Jan 2002 A1
20020029130 Eryurek et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020065631 Loechner May 2002 A1
20020082799 Pramanik Jun 2002 A1
20020095520 Wettstein et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020097031 Cook et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020105968 Pruzan et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020163323 Kasai et al. Nov 2002 A1
20030171827 Keyes, IV et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030204371 Sciamanna Oct 2003 A1
20040086021 Litwin May 2004 A1
20040124854 Slezak Jul 2004 A1
20040184517 Westfield et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040199681 Hedtke Oct 2004 A1
20040203434 Karschnia et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040211456 Brown et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040259533 Nixon et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050017602 Arms et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050056106 Nelson et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050072239 Longsdorf et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050130605 Karschnia et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050164684 Chen et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050201349 Budampati Sep 2005 A1
20050240784 Sugasawa Oct 2005 A1
20050245291 Brown et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050276233 Shepard et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050281215 Budampati et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050289276 Karschnia et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060002368 Budampati et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060036404 Wiklund et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060092039 Saito et al. May 2006 A1
20060116102 Brown et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060148410 Nelson et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060181406 Petite et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060194547 Davis Aug 2006 A1
20060227729 Budampati et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060274644 Budampati et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060274671 Budampati et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060287001 Budampati et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070030816 Kolavennu Feb 2007 A1
20070030832 Gonia et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070229255 Loechner Oct 2007 A1
20070233283 Chen Oct 2007 A1
20070237137 McLaughlin Oct 2007 A1
20070280144 Hodson et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070280178 Hodson et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070280286 Hodson et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070280287 Samudrala et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070282463 Hodson et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070288204 Gienke et al. Dec 2007 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (28)
Number Date Country
3340834 May 1985 DE
196 22 295 May 1996 DE
101 04 582 Oct 2001 DE
102 21 931 May 2002 DE
0 518 916 Feb 1991 EP
0 524 550 Jan 1993 EP
0 895 209 Feb 1999 EP
1202145 Oct 2000 EP
1 202 145 May 2002 EP
1 192 614 Jan 2003 EP
1 293 853 Mar 2003 EP
02067794 Jul 1990 JP
2000-304148 Nov 2000 JP
2003042881 Feb 2003 JP
2003051894 Feb 2003 JP
2003-070079 Mar 2003 JP
2003134261 May 2003 JP
2004021877 Jan 2004 JP
2004-317593 Nov 2004 JP
2005-207648 Aug 2005 JP
WO 9113417 Sep 1991 WO
WO 9507522 Mar 1995 WO
WO 9953286 Oct 1999 WO
WO 03023536 Mar 2003 WO
WO 03089881 Oct 2003 WO
WO 2004023423 Mar 2004 WO
WO 2004094892 Nov 2004 WO
WO 2005060482 Jul 2007 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (38)
Entry
Office Action from Russian Patent Office in Russian U.S. Appl. No. 2006145434.
Office Action from U.S. Patent Office in U.S. Appl. No. 11/028,486.
First Communication issued by the European Patent Office in German Application No. 06774208.0.
XP 002400076.
“Wireless R&D Aims to Boos Traffic,” by M. Moore, InTech with Industrial Computing, Feb. 2002, pp. 40-41.
“System Checks Farawy Machines' Health,” by J. Strothman, InTech with Industrial Computing, Feb. 2002, pp. 42-43.
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report or the Declaration—PCT/US03/10403.
“Wireless Management Toolkit XYR 5000”, by Honeywell International Inc., Phoenix, Arizona, 3 pgs., Oct. 2003.
“Wireless Analog Input Transmitters XYR 5000”, by Honeywell International Inc., Phoenix, Arizona, 4 pgs., Oct. 2003.
“Quad Analog Output Module Installation and User's Manual”, by Honeywell International Inc., Phoenix, Arizona, pgs. Ii, iii, iv and 1-12, Dec. 2003.
International Search Report and Written Opinion of Application No. PCT/US2005/015848, filed May 5, 2005.
“Wireless Dual Analog Input Interface Transmitter Installation and User's Manual”, by Honeywell International Inc., Phoenix, Arizona, pp. Ii-vi and 7-43, Dec. 2003.
“XYR 5000 Wireless Dual Analog Input Interface, Model Selection Guide”, by Honeywell International Inc., Phoenix, Arizona, Dec. 2003.
“Wireless Measure, Monitor & Control”, by Accutech, 4 pgs. May 2003.
“Wireless Instrumentation, Multi-Input Field Unit”, by Accutech, 2 pgs., Dec. 2003.
“Quad Analog Output Module”, by Accutech, 1 pg. Dec. 2003.
3 Pages from Website www.chemicalprocessing.com, Apr. 2004.
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion—PCT/US2005/021757.
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US 03/27561, filed Mar. 9, 2003, dated Jun. 15, 2004.
2002 Microchip Technology Inc., “Stand-Alone CAN Controller with SPI™ Interface,” pp. 1-75, Mar. 1, 2002.
Rosemount Reference Manual 00809-0100-4022,Rev AA, Jul. 2002, “Model 4600 Oil & Gas Panel Transmitter,” 65 pages.
Transmitter Schematic, Sold Jul. 2002, 5 pages.
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2005/007328 filed Mar. 7, 2005. Date of Mailing: Jan. 12, 2006.
4 Pages from Website http://content.honeywell.com/imc/eznews/eznews0403/news.htm, 2004.
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2006/025206 filed Jun. 27, 2006.
“Mechatronic Drives in Mobile Hydraulics,” Internet Article, Soncebox News. No. 4, Oct. 2004.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/028,486 dated May 9, 2008.
First Office Action for Chinese patent application 200680015575.4, filed Jun. 27, 2006.
Official Action for Russian patent application No. 2008103014, filed Jun. 27, 2006.
Second Office Action for Chinese patent application No. 200680015575.4, dated Sep. 25, 2009.
Third Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 200680015575.4 dated May 11, 2010.
First Office Action (Notification of Reasons for Rejection) for Japanese patent application No. 2008-518521 dated Aug. 24, 2010.
First Examination Report from the related Indian patent application No. 9/MUMNP/2008 dated Jan. 3, 2012. 1 page.
Decision to Refuse from a corresponding European patent application No. 06774208.0 dated Apr. 2, 2012.
Provision of the Minutes from the corresponding European patent application No. 06774208.0 dated Apr. 2, 2012.
Fourth Office Action for Chinese patent application No. 200680015575.4 dated Jun. 9, 2011.
Summons to attend Oral Proceedings for corresponding European patent application No. 06774208.0 dated Nov. 7, 2011.
Office Action from the corresponding Canadian patent application No. 2602758 dated Oct. 10, 2012. 5 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20060290328 A1 Dec 2006 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60694201 Jun 2005 US