Field emission display with plural dielectric layers

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6181060
  • Patent Number
    6,181,060
  • Date Filed
    Monday, July 13, 1998
    26 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, January 30, 2001
    24 years ago
Abstract
A field emission display (10) includes an emission tip (16), an insulating layer (18) having composite insulating layers (18A-18C), and a conductive gate (20). The composite insulating layers (18A-18C) include a selectively etchable insulating layer (18B), and reduce leakage current from the base of the emission tip (16) to the gate (20).
Description




FIELD OF THE INVENTION




This invention relates to field emission devices and, more particularly, to processes for sharpening the emission tip of field emission devices.




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




Cathode ray tube (CRT) displays, such as those commonly used in desk-top computer screens, function as a result of a scanning electron beam from an electron gun impinging on phosphors on a relatively distant screen. The electrons increase the energy level of the phosphors. When the phosphors return to their normal energy level, they release the energy from the electrons as a photon of light which is transmitted through the glass screen of the display to the viewer. One disadvantage of a CRT is the depth of the display required to accommodate the raster scanner.




Flat panel displays have become increasingly important in appliances requiring lightweight portable screens. Currently, such screens use electroluminescent or liquid crystal technology. Another promising technology is the use of a matrix-addressable array of cold cathode emission devices to excite phosphor on a screen, often referred to as a field emission display. To produce the desired field emission, a potential source is provided with its positive terminal connected to the gate, or grid, and its negative terminal connected to the emission electrode (cathode conductor substrate). The potential source is variable for the purpose of controlling the electron emission current. Upon application of a potential between the electrodes, an electric field is established between the emission tips and the low potential anode grid, thus causing electrons to be emitted from the cathode tips through the holes in the grid electrode.




The clarity, or resolution, of a field emission display is a function of a number of factors, including emission tip sharpness, alignment and spacing of the gates, or grid openings, which surround the tips, pixel size, as well as cathode-to-gate and cathode-to-screen voltages. These factors are also interrelated. For example, the voltage required for electron emission from the emission tips is a function of both cathode-to-gate spacing and tip sharpness. A relatively sharper emission tip may both improve resolution and lower power consumption.




Existing techniques for sharpening the emission tip typically involve an oxidation process followed by an etch process. The surface of the semiconductor substrate, such as silicon, and the emission tip are first oxidized to produce an oxide layer of SiO


2


, which is then etched to sharpen the tip. The oxidation process is ordinarily either a wet or a dry process. In a dry oxidation process, the substrate and emission tip are exposed to an atmosphere containing a significant percentage of gaseous oxygen at temperatures of 800° C. or more. In a wet oxidation process the substrate and tip are exposed to steam at around 800° C.




In either existing oxidation technique, there is the risk that the oxidation process itself will induce flow of silicon and oxide, that is, cause the silicon and the forming oxide layer near the top of the emission tip to, in essence, flow down the sloping sides of the tip. This flowing action results in an undesirable rounding of the tip. In a dry process, oxidation typically does not appreciably occur below 800° C. However, at temperatures above 800° C., flow of silicon and oxide can readily occur. A wet process will usually grow a sufficient oxide layer at 800° C., however, the chemical nature of existing wet processes can nevertheless lead to significant flow of silicon and oxide.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




In one aspect of the present invention, a method of sharpening the emission tip in a field emission device that has a semiconductor substrate is provided. The method includes the steps of forming an insulating layer on the semiconductor substrate and the emission tip by exposing the semiconductor substrate and the emission tip to a mixture of gases containing oxygen and ozone, and selectively removing a portion of the insulating layer to expose the emission tip.




In another aspect of the present invention, a method for manufacturing a field emission display having reduced surface leakage is provided. In the method at least one emission tip is formed on a substrate and a first insulator is disposed on the emission tip by exposing the substrate and the emission tip to a mixture of gases containing oxygen and ozone. A second insulator is disposed on the first insulator. The second insulator is selectively etchable to the first insulator. A third insulator is disposed on the second insulator. The second insulator is selectively etchable to the third insulator. A conductive layer is disposed on the insulators. The insulators and the conductive layer are planarized, and portions of the insulators are selectively removed to expose the emission tip.




In still another aspect of the present invention, a field emission display having reduced surface leakage is provided. The field emission display includes a semiconductor substrate and at least one emission tip. The at least one emission tip is sharpened by forming an insulating layer on the semiconductor substrate and the emission tip by exposing the semiconductor substrate and the emission tip to a mixture of gases containing oxygen and ozone and selectively removing a portion of the insulating layer to expose the emission tip to leave a dielectric region surrounding the emission tip. The field emission display also includes a conductive gate that is disposed on the dielectric region.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS




The present invention will be better understood from reading the following description of embodiments, with reference to the attached drawings, wherein below:





FIG. 1

is a cross-sectional schematic drawing of a conventional field emission display;





FIG. 2

is a cross-sectional schematic drawing of field emission display and emission tip having multiple conformal insulating layers and a conductive gate layer deposited thereon, in accordance with the present invention;





FIG. 3

is a cross-sectional schematic drawing of the electron emission tip of

FIG. 2

, after a mechanical planarization step has been performed, in accordance with the present invention;





FIG. 4

is a cross-sectional schematic drawing of the electron emission tip of

FIG. 3

, after the insulating layers have undergone an etching process to expose the emission tip, in accordance with the present invention; and





FIG. 5

is a cross-sectional schematic drawing of a field emission display in accordance with the present invention.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE SPECIFIC EMBODIMENTS




Conventional Apparatus and Process




Referring to

FIG. 1

, a conventional field emission display employing a cold cathode is depicted. The substrate


1


is typically comprised of a suitable semiconductor material, such as silicon. At a field emission site location, a conductive cathode layer


2


is placed over the substrate


1


. A upwardly projecting conical microcathode or emission tip


3


has been formed on the conductive cathode layer


2


. A low potential anode gate structure


5


surrounds the emission tip


3


. When a voltage differential, through a source


6


, is applied between the emission tip


3


and the gate


5


, a stream of electrons


7


is emitted toward a phosphor coated screen


8


. The screen


8


functions as an anode. The electron emission tip


3


serves as a cathode conductor. The gate


5


serves as a low potential anode or grid structure for its respective emission tip


3


. A dielectric insulating layer


4


is located on the conductive cathode layer


2


. The insulator


4


also has an opening at the field emission site location.




The dotted lines in

FIG. 1

illustrate the paths followed by electrons that have leaked from the emission tip


3


. The emission tip


3


has a negative charge relative to the gate


5


. Although the electron stream


7


emanates from the apex of the emission tip


3


, some of the electrons


7


leak from the base of the emission tip


3


to the gate


5


largely traveling along the insulator


4


between them. The surface leakage from the emission tip


3


to gate


5


is a parasitic power loss, as well as a potential source for generating a destructive arc.




Embodiment of the Present Invention




The embodiments of the present invention are best understood with reference to

FIGS. 2-5

of the drawings which depict the initial, intermediate and final structures produced by a series of manufacturing steps in accordance with the present invention. A finished field emission display


10


is shown in FIG.


5


and includes a substrate


12


and a cathode conductor layer


14


disposed on the substrate


12


. A portion of the cathode conductor layer


14


is formed into a conical emission tip


16


. An insulator layer


18


is disposed on the cathode layer


14


. The insulator layer


18


also has an opening at the field emission site location. A gate layer


20


is disposed on the insulator layer


18


. The gate layer


20


serves as a low potential anode or grid structure for its emission tip


16


. A phosphor screen


22


that functions as an anode is disposed over the emission tip


16


. When a voltage differential, through a source


24


, is applied between the emission tip


16


and the gate


20


, a stream of electrons


26


is emitted toward the screen


22


.




Initially, the substrate


12


is provided and selectively masked at the future field emission cathode sites. The substrate


12


may be formed from silicon, silicon-on-insulator, silicon-on-sapphire or similar materials. Thereafter, the emission tip


16


is formed by selective sidewise removal of the underlying peripheral surrounding regions of the semiconductor substrate


12


beneath the edges of the masked island areas. The result is the production of the centrally disposed, raised, field emission tip


16


in the region immediately under each masked island area defining a field emission cathode site. There are several methods by which to form the electron emission tip


16


. Examples of such methods are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,970,887 entitled, “Micro-structure Field Emission Electron Source;” U.S. Pat. No. 5,302,238 entitled, “Plasma Dry Etch to Produce Atomically Sharp Asperities Useful as Cold Cathodes;” and U.S. Pat. No. 5,391,259 entitled, “A Method of Forming a Substantially Uniform Array of Sharp Tips,” all of which are incorporated herein by reference.




In an embodiment of the present invention, the emission tip


16


is sharpened through an oxidation process before beginning the gate


20


formation process. The surface of the silicon wafer (Si), or other substrate,


12


and the emission tip


16


are oxidized to produce an oxide layer of SiO


2


, which is then etched to sharpen the tip


16


. Any conventional, known oxidation process may be employed in forming the SiO


2


, and etching the emission tip


16


.




In an alternative embodiment of the process of the present invention, the emission tip


16


is sharpened through an oxidation process during gate


20


formation. As will be discussed below, the process of the present invention employs an oxide layer


18




a


proximate to the emission tip


16


which electrically and physically separates the emission tip


16


from the gate


20


.




After the formation of the emission tip


16


, a composite insulating (dielectric) layer


18


is formed. The insulative layer


18


is termed composite to illustrate that it may be formed by depositing or otherwise forming multiple separate layers


18




a


-


18




c


. . .


18




n.


The layer


18


may have a thickness in the range of 100 Å to 4000 Å.




Although a composite of three layers is illustrated, layer


18


can be comprised of more layers. The types and thicknesses of the materials selected for the insulative dielectric layer


18


determine the gate


20


to emission tip


16


spacing. Hence, depending on the desired gate


20


to emission tip


16


spacing, the number and thickness of the insulating dielectric layers


18




a


. . .


18




n


is adjusted. The thickness of the insulating layers


18




a


and


18




c,


together with the selectively etchable insulating layer


18




b


also determines the gate


20


to substrate


12


spacing.




The composite insulating layer


18


comprises selectively etchable material layers


18




a


-


18




c.



FIG. 2

illustrates one embodiment of the present invention in which the insulating layer


18


is comprised of oxide/nitride/oxide. The composite insulating layer


18


, as shown in

FIG. 2

, is a conformal insulating layer


18


. The insulating layers


18


are deposited on the emission tip


16


in a manner such that the insulating layers


18


conform to the conical shape of the emission tip


16


.




In the illustrative embodiment, the insulating layer


18




a


is deposited on the emission tip


16


. The insulating layer


18




a


is conformal in nature, and therefore uniformly blankets the emission tip


16


and the substrate surface


12


. The illustrative embodiment uses silicon dioxide, tetraethylorthosilicate (TEOS), or other suitable oxide. Alternatively, the oxide layer


18




a


is grown on the emission tip


16


to a desired thickness. Growing the oxide layer


18




a,


likewise yields a conformal layer


18




a.


This is the method by which the emission tip


16


is simultaneously sharpened. As the oxide


18




a


is grown, silicon is consumed from the sides of the emission tips


16


. When the oxide layer


18




a


is subsequently removed, the emission tip


16


becomes thinner, and consequently, sharper as a result.




The next layer in the illustrative embodiment is the insulating layer


18




b,


which is a conformally deposited nitride layer


18




b,


such as silicon nitride. A nitride


18




b


is selected because nitrides are selectively etchable with respect to oxides, which comprise the other insulating layers


18




a


and


18




c,


in the illustrative embodiment. Although other materials which are selectively etchable with respect to the insulating layers


18




a


and


18




c


may be used, (e.g., silicon oxynitride) a silicon nitride layer


18




b


is particularly effective against oxygen diffusion. Therefore, a nitride is useful for layers as thin as 1000 Å. However, the insulating layer


18




b


is preferably greater than 1000 Å. Silicon nitride is also preferred because it is easier to stop a mechanical planarization process, such as chemical mechanical planarization, on a nitride layer than on an oxide layer. Additionally, nitrides have a higher mechanical strength than oxides.




The silicon nitride layer


18




b


is preferably deposited by chemical vapor deposition (CVD, methods, including, but not limited to, low pressure chemical vapor deposition (LPCVD) and plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD). It is also possible to deposit the nitride layer


18




b


using dichlorosilane (SiCl


2


H


2


) and ammonia (NH


3


).




The insulating layer


18




c


is disposed on the nitride layer


18




b.


In the illustrative embodiment, the layer


18




c


is silicon dioxide, tetraethylorthosilicate (TEOS), or other suitable oxide. The insulating layer


18




c


is also deposited by a technique, such as Chemical Vapor Deposition (CVD).




In another alternative embodiment of the process of the present invention, the emission tip


16


is sharpened, either before or during gate


20


formation, through an oxidation and etch process that reduces the potential for silicon and oxide flow. Following formation of the emission tip


16


, the substrate


12


and the emission tip


16


are exposed to a mixture of gaseous oxygen and ozone at temperatures below 800° C. In this alternative embodiment of the process of the present invention, the preferred mixture of O


2


and O


3


ranges from about 95% O


2


and 5% O


3


(by weight) to about 85% O


2


and 15% O


3


by weight). The O


3


may be generated by any conventional means, such as arc discharge or plasma techniques. It is preferred that the oxygen used for the mixture be grade 5 or better. One preferred temperature range for the oxidation process is between about 650° C. and 750° C. It is anticipated that the more prevalent temperature range will be between about 700° C. and 750° C.




The duration of exposure will depend on the pre-sharpening condition of the emission tip


16


. A relatively sharper emission tip


16


will require a thinner conformal oxide layer


18




a


and a correspondingly shorter exposure to the O


2


/O


3


mixture. Conversely, a relatively more rounded emission tip


16


will require a thicker conformal oxide layer


18




a


and a correspondingly longer exposure. It is anticipated that the duration of exposure will typically range from about one-half to about one hour.




The mixture of O


2


and O


3


enables the oxidation process to occur below the high temperatures associated with typical dry oxidation processes, and without the potential flow of silicon and oxide associated with wet oxidation processes, even at temperatures below 800° C. It is believed that this is due to the heightened diffusivity and reactivity of negatively charged oxygen ions ejected from O


3


molecules upon contact with the silicon surface of the emission tip


16


.




To slow the rate of reaction between the O


2


/O


3


mixture and the silicon surface of the emission tip


16


, diluent gases may be added to the mixture. The diluent gases are preferably, though not necessarily, inert gases, such as argon, krypton, nitrogen, or similar gases.




To achieve other desirable effects from the oxidation process, such as purification of the emission tip


16


, the mixture may also include common gettering agents, such as trans-1,2-dichloroethylene (C


2


H


2


Cl


2


), gaseous HCL, or similar agents, to attract metal ion impurities out of the emission tip


16


. In the typical process flow, the emission tip


16


is first exposed to the O


2


/O


3


mixture for an initial period. Subsequently, the getting agent is added to the mixture. Common gettering agents will have a tendency to degrade the O


3


gas. Accordingly, where a gettering agent is used, a higher than ordinary initial concentration of O


3


may be required to account for the loss of O


3


following introduction of the gettering agent.




Following formation of the oxide layer


18




a,


additional insulating layers may then be formed as previously disclosed. The insulating layers


18


may then be etched to expose the emission tip


16


as discussed below.




The next step in the process is the deposition of the conductive gate layer


20


. The gate layer


20


may comprise a metal such as chromium or molybdenum, but the preferred material for this process is deemed to be doped polysilicon. The conductive material


20


is also preferably conformal in nature.




In one embodiment of the present invention, a buffer material is deposited to prevent undesired etching of the lower-lying portions of the conductive gate material layer during the mechanical polishing planarization step which follows. A suitable buffering material is a thin layer of Si


3


N


4


. The nitride buffer layer has the effect of protecting the emission tip


16


, which is one advantage of performing this optional step. The buffering layer substantially impedes the progress of the mechanical planarization into the layer on which the buffering material is deposited.




The next step in the gate formation process is the mechanical planarization, which, as noted above, may be chemical mechanical polishing (CMP). Through the use of chemical and abrasive techniques, the buffer material as well as any other layers (e.g. the conductive material layer


20


and the conformal insulating layers


18




a


-


18




c


) extending beyond the emission tip


16


are “polished” away. This is the manner by which the gate


20


and emission tips


16


of the present invention are self-aligned, as illustrated in FIG.


3


.




In contrast, the gate etch masks of early field emission displays were manually aligned to emission tips. Manual alignment introduces variability into the process, which often results in less than optimum electron emission patterns. The self-aligned fabrication of emission tips


16


and gates


20


greatly reduces process variability, decreases manufacturing costs, and results in a display having greater image sharpness.




In general, CMP involves holding or rotating a wafer of semiconductor material against a wetted polishing surface under controlled chemical slurry, pressure, and temperature conditions.




A chemical slurry containing a polishing agent such as alumina or silica may be utilized as the abrasive medium. Additionally, the chemical slurry may contain chemical etchants. This procedure is used to produce a surface with a desired endpoint or thickness, which also has a polished and planarized surface, as shown in FIG.


3


. Such apparatus for polishing are disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,193,226 and 4,811,522. Another such apparatus is manufactured by Westech Engineering and is designated as a Model 372 Polisher.




CMP is performed substantially over the entire wafer surface, and at a high pressure. Initially, CMP will proceed at a very fast rate, as the peaks are being removed, then the rate will slow dramatically as the surface becomes more planar. The removal rate of the CMP is proportionally related to the pressure and the hardness of the surface being planarized.





FIG. 3

illustrates the intermediate step in the gate formation process following the CMP. A substantially planar surface is achieved, and the conformal insulating layers


18




a


-


18




c


are thereby exposed.

FIG. 3

shows the means by which the conformal insulating layers


18




a


-


18




c


define the gate


20


to emission tip


16


spacing, as well as the means by which the gate


20


is self-aligned.




The next process step is a wet etching of the selectively-etchable insulating layers


18




a


-


18




c


to expose the emission tip


16


. The insulating layer


18




b


is selectively etchable with respect to the oxide insulating layers


18




a


and


18




c.



FIG. 4

illustrates the field emission device


10


after the insulating cavity has been so etched. The device


10


is dipped in hot phosphoric acid to etch back the nitride layer


18




b


to a point at which the fins


28


do not interfere with the emissions of the emission tip


16


. A wet buffered oxide etch having sufficient selectivity to nitride is preferably used to remove the desired portions of insulating layers


18




a


and


18




c.


Hydrofluoric acid (HF) is an example of an etchant which has a sufficient selectivity to nitride. These are the preferred etchants due to their cost and commercial availability. Alternatively, the oxide layers


18




a


and


18




c


are isotropically etched in a plasma environment using suitable etchant gases commonly known in the art.




Once the insulating layers


18




a


and


18




c


have been etched back, the fins


28


in the nitride layer


18




b


becomes apparent. These fins


28


increase the surface distance of the leakage path, as indicated by the dotted lines in FIG.


5


. If multiple nitride layers


18




b


are formed, a series of fins


28


results.




If desired, the emission tip


16


may, optionally, be coated with a low work-function material. Low work function materials include, but are not limited to cermet (Cr


3


Si+SiO


2


), cesium, rubidium, tantalum nitride, barium, chromium silicide, titanium carbide, molybdenum, and niobium.




Coating of the emission tips


16


may be accomplished in one of many ways. The low work-function material or its precursor may be deposited through sputtering or other suitable means on the emission tips


16


. Certain metals (e.g., titanium or chromium) may be reacted with the silicon of the emission tips


16


to form silicide during a rapid thermal processing (RTP) step. Following the RTP step, any unreacted metal is removed from the emission tip


16


. In a nitrogen ambient, deposited tantalum may be converted during RTP to tantalum nitride, a material having a particularly low work function. The coating process variations are almost endless.




This results in an emission tip


16


that may not only be sharper than a plain silicon tip, but that also has greater resistance to erosion and a lower work function. The silicide is formed by the reaction of the refractory metal with the underlying silicon by an anneal step.




In an alternative embodiment of the present invention (not shown), a flowable insulating layer is interposed among the conformal insulating layers


18




a


-


18




c,


in the formation of composite layer


18


. The flowable layer must still be selectively etchable with respect to the other insulating layers of the composite


18


.




In this embodiment, a conformally deposited silicon nitride layer is formed first, and alone substantially determines the gate


20


to emission tip


16


spacing. Although other materials which are selectively etchable with respect to the flowable insulating layer may be used, (e.g., SiO


2


, and silicon oxynitride) a nitride layer is particularly effective against oxygen diffusion and, therefore, is useful for layers as thin as 1000 Å, but preferably greater than 1000 Å. This is particularly advantageous, since small gate


20


to emission tip


16


distances result in lower emission drive voltages.




The next step is the deposition of the flowable insulating layer. The flowable insulating layer comprises at least one of: spin-on-glass (SOG), borophosphosilicate glass (BPSG), or a polyimide, or other suitable material, including, but not limited to, other spin on dielectrics or flowable dielectrics. Under certain conditions, such materials flow easily over the surface of the wafer, resulting in a densified planarized layer. The thickness of the flowable insulating layer, together with the conformal nitride layer determines the gate


20


to substrate


12


spacing.




One preferred flowable insulator is BPSG. The BPSG layer is also initially deposited by CVD using a phosphorous source such as phosphine (PH


3


) gas. The wafer surface may also be exposed to a boron source such a diborane (B


2


H


6


) gas. The resultant BPSG layer initially covers the emission tip


16


, and is then reflowed. In general, the BPSG reflow is performed at a temperature in the range of 700° C. to 1050° C. In practice, the upper limit of the reflow temperature will be controlled by the effects of the reflow on the substrate and other related structures. In one embodiment, the BPSG layer is heated to a temperature of approximately 1000° C. to cause a slight flow of the flowable insulating material, preferably, to a substantially uniform level below the emission tip


16


.




After the reflow step, the emission tip


16


is exposed, thereby providing an opportunity to add another conformal insulating layer prior to the deposition of the conductive gate material layer


20


. An insulating material which is selectively etchable with respect to the flowable layer is formed thereon to further adjust the spacing between the gate


20


and the emission tip


16


.




After the composite insulating layer


18


is formed and the conductive gate layer


20


is deposited, a mechanical planarization process is undertaken to planarize the layers, as in the illustrated embodiment. A series of selective etch steps are then carried out, as previously described, to expose the emission tip


16


and adjust the size of the insulator fins.




While the particular process as herein shown and disclosed in detail is fully capable of obtaining the objects and advantages herein before stated, it is to be understood that it is merely illustrative of the presently preferred embodiments of the invention and that no limitations are intended to the details of construction or design herein shown other than as described in the appended claims.



Claims
  • 1. A field emitter display having reduced surface leakage, said field emitter display comprising:at least one emitter tip sharpened by forming an insulating layer on said semiconductor substrate and said emission tip by exposing said semiconductor substrate and said emission tip to a mixture of gases containing oxygen and ozone and selectively removing a portion of said insulating layer to expose said emission tip to leave a dielectric region surrounding said emission tip; a dielectric region surrounding said emitter tip, said dielectric region being formed of a composite of insulative layers, at least one of said insulative layers having fins extending toward said emitter tip; and a conductive gate disposed superjacent said dielectric region.
  • 2. The field emitter device according to claim 1, wherein said composite of insulative layers comprises at least a first oxide layer, a nitride layer, and a second oxide layer.
  • 3. The field emitter device according to claim 2, wherein said fins extend from said nitride layer, said fins being spaced a sufficient distance from said emitter tip to prevent interference with emission.
  • 4. The field emitter device according to claim 3, wherein said conductive gate comprises polysilicon.
  • 5. The field emitter device according to claim 4, wherein at least one of said oxide layers comprises tetraethylorthosilicate (TEOS).
  • 6. The field emitter device according to claim 5, wherein said emitter tip is disposed in an array of like emitter tips.
  • 7. The field emitter device according to claim 6, wherein said composite of insulative layers further comprises a second nitride layer, said second nitride layer having additional fins extending therefrom.
  • 8. A field emitter device comprising:a substrate having an electron emitter thereon, said electron emitter having a base portion and a tip portion, said tip portion sharpened by forming an insulating layer on said semiconductor substrate and said emission tip by exposing said semiconductor substrate and said emission tip to a mixture of gases containing oxygen and ozone and selectively removing a portion of said insulating layer to expose said emission tip to leave a dielectric region surrounding said emission tip; a gate structure adjacent said electron emitter; and a dielectric region between said electron emitter and said gate structure, said dielectric region having an uneven surface extending between said electron emitter and said gate structure.
  • 9. The device, as set forth in claim 8, wherein said gate structure is disposed adjacent said tip portion of said electron emitter.
  • 10. The device, as set forth in claim 8, wherein said gate structure comprises polysilicon.
  • 11. The device, as set forth in claim 8, wherein said dielectric region comprises a plurality of dielectric layers, at least one of said plurality of dielectric layers extending toward said electron emitter to a greater extent than the other of said plurality of dielectric layers.
  • 12. The device, as set forth in claim 8, wherein said dielectric region comprises a plurality of dielectric layers, a first plurality of said plurality of dielectric layers extending toward said electron emitter in comparison to a second plurality of said plurality of dielectric layers.
  • 13. The device, as set forth in claim 8, wherein said dielectric region comprises a plurality of dielectric layers, at least one of said plurality of dielectric layers being spaced within a first distance from said electron emitter and the other of said plurality of dielectric layers being spaced at least a second distance from said electron emitter, said first distance being less than said second distance.
  • 14. The device, as set forth in claim 8, wherein said dielectric region comprises a plurality of dielectric layers, a first plurality of said plurality of dielectric layers being spaced within a first distance from said electron emitter and a second plurality of said plurality of dielectric layers being spaced at least a second distance from said electron emitter, said first distance being less than said second distance.
  • 15. A field emitter device comprising:a substrate having an electron emitter thereon, said electron emitter having a base portion and a tip portion, said tip portion sharpened by forming an insulating layer on said semiconductor substrate and said emission tip by exposing said semiconductor substrate and said emission tip to a mixture of gases containing oxygen and ozone and selectively removing a portion of said insulating layer to expose said emission tip to leave a dielectric region surrounding said emission tip; a gate structure adjacent and spaced apart from said electron emitter; and a dielectric region adjacent said electron emitter, said dielectric region being formed from a plurality of layers, at least one of said plurality of layers extending into a space between said dielectric region and said electron emitter.
  • 16. The device, as set forth in claim 15, wherein said gate structure is disposed adjacent said tip portion of said electron emitter.
  • 17. The device, as set forth in claim 15, wherein said gate structure comprises polysilicon.
  • 18. The device, as set forth in claim 15, wherein a first plurality of said plurality of layers extends into said space.
  • 19. The device, as set forth in claim 15, wherein said at least one of said plurality of layers is spaced within a first distance from said electron emitter and the other of said plurality of layers is spaced at least a second distance from said electron emitter, said first distance being less than said second distance.
  • 20. The device, as set forth in claim 15, wherein a first plurality of said plurality of layers is spaced within a first distance from said electron emitter and a second plurality of said plurality of layers is spaced at least a second distance from said electron emitter, said first distance being less than said second distance.
  • 21. A field emitter device comprising:a substrate having an electron emitter thereon, said electron emitter having a base portion and a tip portion, said tip portion sharpened by forming an insulating layer on said semiconductor substrate and said emission tip by exposing said semiconductor substrate and said emission tip to a mixture of gases containing oxygen and ozone and selectively removing a portion of said insulating layer to expose said emission tip to leave a dielectric region surrounding said emission tip; a gate structure surrounding said tip portion of said electron emitter; and a dielectric region surrounding said base portion of said electron emitter, said dielectric region being formed from a plurality of layers, said plurality of layers being nonuniformly spaced from said base portion of said electron emitter.
  • 22. The device, as set forth in claim 21, wherein said gate structure comprises polysilicon.
  • 23. The device, as set forth in claim 21, wherein at least one of said plurality of layers extends toward said base portion of said electron emitter to a greater extend than the other of said plurality of layers.
  • 24. The device, as set forth in claim 21, wherein a first plurality of said plurality of layers extends toward said base portion of said electron emitter to a greater extend than a second plurality of said plurality of layers.
  • 25. The device, as set forth in claim 21, wherein said at least one of said plurality of layers is spaced within a first distance from said electron emitter and the other of said plurality of layers is spaced at least a second distance from said electron emitter, said first distance being less than said second distance.
  • 26. The device, as set forth in claim 21, wherein a first plurality of said plurality of layers is spaced within a first distance from said electron emitter and a second plurality of said plurality of layers is spaced at least a second distance from said electron emitter, said first distance being less than said second distance.
  • 27. A field emitter device comprising:a substrate having an electron emitter extending therefrom, said electron emitter having a base portion and a tip portion, said base portion being coupled to said substrate, said tip portion sharpened by forming an insulating layer on said semiconductor substrate and said emission tip by exposing said semiconductor substrate and said emission tip to a mixture of gases containing oxygen and ozone and selectively removing a portion of said insulating layer to expose said emission tip to leave a dielectric region surrounding said emission tip; a dielectric region surrounding said base portion of said electron emitter, said dielectric region being disposed on said substrate, said dielectric region having a protrusion extending toward said electron emitter; and a gate structure adjacent said tip portion of said electron emitter.
  • 28. The device, as set forth in claim 27, wherein said gate structure comprises polysilicon.
  • 29. The device, as set forth in claim 27, wherein said dielectric region comprises a plurality of dielectric layers, at least one of said plurality of dielectric layers extending toward said electron emitter to a greater extent than the other of said plurality of dielectric layers.
  • 30. The device, as set forth in claim 27, wherein said dielectric region comprises a plurality of dielectric layers, a first plurality of said plurality of dielectric layers extending toward said electron emitter in comparison to a second plurality of said plurality of dielectric layers.
  • 31. The device, as set forth in claim 27, wherein said dielectric region comprises a plurality of dielectric layers, at least one of said plurality of dielectric layers being spaced within a first distance from said electron emitter and the other of said plurality of dielectric layers being spaced at least a second distance from said electron emitter, said first distance being less than said second distance.
  • 32. The device, as set forth in claim 27, wherein said dielectric region comprises a plurality of dielectric layers, a first plurality of said plurality of dielectric layers being spaced within a first distance from said electron emitter and a second plurality of said plurality of dielectric layers being spaced at least a second distance from said electron emitter, said first distance being less than said second distance.
  • 33. A field emitter device comprising:a substrate having an electron emitter thereon, said electron emitter having a base portion and a tip portion, said base portion being coupled to said substrate, said tip portion sharpened by forming an insulating layer on said semiconductor substrate and said emission tip by exposing said semiconductor substrate and said emission tip to a mixture of gases containing oxygen and ozone and selectively removing a portion of said insulating layer to expose said emission tip to leave a dielectric region surrounding said emission tip; a first dielectric region adjacent said electron emitter, said first dielectric region being spaced apart from said electron emitter by a first distance; a second dielectric region adjacent said first dielectric region, said second dielectric region being spaced apart from said electron emitter by a second distance, said second distance being greater than said first distance; and a gate structure adjacent and spaced apart from said electron emitter.
Parent Case Info

This application is a Divisional of application Ser. No. 08/744,512 filed Nov. 6, 1996, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,022,256.

US Referenced Citations (42)
Number Name Date Kind
3665241 Spindt et al. May 1972
3721022 Mercorelli Mar 1973
3755704 Spindt et al. Aug 1973
3789471 Spindt et al. Feb 1974
3812559 Spindt et al. May 1974
3875442 Wasa et al. Apr 1975
3921022 Levine Nov 1975
3970887 Smith et al. Jul 1976
3998678 Fukase et al. Dec 1976
4663559 Christensen May 1987
4666553 Blumenfeld et al. May 1987
4671851 Beyer et al. Jun 1987
4746629 Hanagasaki May 1988
4763187 Biberian Aug 1988
4766340 van der Mast et al. Aug 1988
4857161 Borel et al. Aug 1989
4857799 Spindt et al. Aug 1989
4943343 Bardai et al. Jul 1990
4964946 Gray et al. Oct 1990
5012153 Atkinson et al. Apr 1991
5036015 Sandhu et al. Jul 1991
5038070 Bardai et al. Aug 1991
5055158 Gallagher et al. Oct 1991
5057047 Greene et al. Oct 1991
5070282 Epsztein Dec 1991
5075591 Holmberg Dec 1991
5143820 Kotecha et al. Sep 1992
5151061 Sandhu Sep 1992
5186670 Doan et al. Feb 1993
5188977 Stengl et al. Feb 1993
5191217 Kane et al. Mar 1993
5209687 Konishi May 1993
5229331 Doan et al. Jul 1993
5232549 Cathey et al. Aug 1993
5259799 Doan et al. Nov 1993
5266530 Bagley et al. Nov 1993
5302238 Roe et al. Apr 1994
5372973 Doan et al. Dec 1994
5378182 Liu Jan 1995
5394006 Liu Feb 1995
5653619 Cloud et al. Aug 1997
5696028 Rolfson et al. Dec 1997
Foreign Referenced Citations (13)
Number Date Country
0 520 780 A1 Dec 1992 EP
49-122269 Nov 1974 JP
51-21471 Feb 1976 JP
51-120167 Oct 1976 JP
51-119164 Oct 1977 JP
52-132771 Nov 1977 JP
56-160740 Dec 1981 JP
61-120424 Jun 1986 JP
1-128332 May 1989 JP
3-22329 Jan 1991 JP
3-194829 Aug 1991 JP
5-21002 Sep 1993 JP
5-21003 Sep 1993 JP
Non-Patent Literature Citations (4)
Entry
M. Sokolich et al., “Field Emission From Submicron Emitter Arrays,” IEEE, International Electron Devices Meeting, San Francisco, CA., Dec. 9-12, 1990, pp. 159-162.
Liut et al., “Fabrication of self-aligned gated field emitters,” Dept. of Electrical Eng., New Jersey Inst. of Technology, Jan. 1992, pp. 21-24.
“Extended Abstracts,” The Japan Society of Applied Physics, (The 53rd Autumn Meeting, 1992), p. 553.
Stanley Wolf Ph.D., “Silicon Processing For the VLSI Era,” vol. 2: Process Integration, p. 239.