Field programmable gate array based upon transistor gate oxide breakdown

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6650143
  • Patent Number
    6,650,143
  • Date Filed
    Monday, July 8, 2002
    21 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, November 18, 2003
    20 years ago
Abstract
A field programmable gate array (FPGA) cell useful in a FPGA array having column bitlines, read bitlines, and row wordlines is disclosed. The cell comprises a capacitor having a first terminal and a second terminal, the first terminal connected to a column bitline, said second terminal connected to a switch control node, the capacitor having a dielectric between the first and second terminal. The cell also includes a select transistor having a gate, a source, and a drain, the gate connected to the read bitline, the source connected to the switch control node, and the drain connected to a row wordline. Finally, the cell includes a switch being controlled by the switch control node.
Description




TECHNICAL FIELD OF THE INVENTION




The present invention relates to field programmable gate arrays (FPGA), and more particularly, to a FPGA based upon the breakdown of the gate oxide of a transistor.




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




FPGA's are finding increasing application as logic and/or processing elements. One type of FPGA utilizes SRAM cells, which requires six transistors. This results in a large cell size and therefore low density. Moreover, SRAM based FPGA is volatile.




Another type of FPGA is based upon anti-fuse technology. Although widely accepted, anti-fuse technology requires specialized fuse manufacturing process. Further, a FPGA based upon anti-fuse technology can only be programmed once.




Yet another type of FPGA is based upon flash memory technology. However, flash memory technology requires a relatively more complex semiconductor manufacturing process, thereby increasing cost.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

is a schematic circuit diagram of a portion of a FPGA in accordance with the present invention.





FIG. 2

is a partial layout diagram of a portion of the FPGA represented by FIG.


1


.





FIG. 3

is a table of voltages showing the operation of the FPGA cell of

FIGS. 1-3

.





FIG. 4

is a table of voltages showing the operation of an alternative embodiment of a FPGA cell.





FIG. 5

is a cross-section diagram of an experimental setup.





FIG. 6

is a graph showing the effect of a constant voltage stress on an ultra-thin gate oxide.





FIG. 7

is a graph showing various stages in the current-voltage characteristics of an ultra-thin gate oxide as degradation proceeds.





FIG. 8

is a graph showing time-to-breakdown at 63% distribution vs. gate voltage in a semi-log scale measured on n-channel field effect transistors (inversion) for various oxide thickness.





FIG. 9

is a graph showing the current-voltage characteristics of n-type devices measured after the detection of successive breakdown events.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION




A FPGA based on transistors having an ultra-thin dielectric that can be stressed into breakdown (soft or hard breakdown) to set a leakage current level is disclosed. A suitable ultra-thin dielectric is the high quality gate oxide of about 50 Å thickness or less used in a transistor, as is commonly available from presently available advanced CMOS logic processes. Such oxides are commonly formed by deposition, by oxide growth from a silicon active region, or by some combination thereof. Other suitable dielectrics include oxide-nitride-oxide composites, compound oxides, and so forth.




In the following description, numerous specific details are provided to provide a thorough understanding of embodiments of the invention. One skilled in the relevant art will recognize, however, that the invention can be practiced without one or more of the specific details, or with other methods, components, materials, etc. In other instances, well-known structures, materials, or operations are not shown or described in detail to avoid obscuring aspects of the invention.




Reference throughout this specification to “one embodiment” or “an embodiment” means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment is included in at least one embodiment of the present invention. Thus, the appearances of the phrases “in one embodiment” or “in an embodiment” in various places throughout this specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment. Furthermore, the particular features, structures, or characteristics may be combined in any suitable manner in one or more embodiments.




The present invention is related to gate oxide breakdown based flash memory designs developed by the present inventor and assigned to the same assignee as the present invention. Examples are shown in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/955,641 filed on Sep. 18, 2001 entitled “SEMICONDUCTOR MEMORY CELL AND MEMORY ARRAY USING A BREAKDOWN PHENOMENA IN AN ULTRA-THIN DIELECTRIC”, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/024,327 filed on Dec. 17, 2001 entitled “SEMICONDUCTOR MEMORY CELL AND MEMORY ARRAY USING A BREAKDOWN PHENOMENA IN AN ULTRA-THIN DIELECTRIC”, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/982,034 filed on Oct. 17, 2001 entitled “SMART CARD HAVING NON-VOLATILE MEMORY FORMED FROM LOGIC PROCESS”, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/982,314 filed on Oct. 17, 2001 entitled “REPROGRAMMABLE NON-VOLATILE OXIDE MEMORY FORMED FROM LOGIC PROCESS”, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/133,604 filed Apr. 26, 2002 entitled “HIGH DENSITY SEMICONDUCTOR MEMORY CELL AND MEMORY ARRAY USING A SINGLE TRANSISTOR”, each of which is hereby incorporated by reference.





FIG. 1

shows an example of a FPGA array


100


formed in accordance of with the present invention. The array


100


is a two column by two row array, however, it can be appreciated that the array can be any arbitrary size. The array


100


includes four memory cells


102


, each of which comprises a select transistor


104


, a capacitor


106


, and a switch


108


.




Examining the memory cell


102


at, for example, the crosspoint of the first row R


1


and the first column C


1


(also referred to herein as a “bitline” or “column bitline”), the memory cell


102


has the gate of its select transistor


104


connected to a read bitline (BLR) line. The drain of the select transistor


104


is connected to a row line R


1


(also referred to herein as a “wordline” or “row wordline”). The source of the select transistor


104


is connected to one terminal of the capacitor


106


. The other terminal of the capacitor is connected to the column bitline (BL).




The gate of the switch


108


is also connected to the source of the select transistor


104


, thusly, between the source and one terminal of the capacitor


106


. This connection point is referred to as a switch control node. The source and drain of the switch


108


are connected in a “daisy chain” manner with the other switches common to that column.




As will be seen below, during the programming step, a relatively large voltage is across the capacitor


106


of the selected column and selected row to break down the gate oxide of the capacitor


106


. The other memory cells


102


shown in

FIG. 1

are also formed from, in one embodiment, identical cells


102


at the crosspoints of the column bitlines C


x


and row wordlines R


y


, where y=1 to N and N is the total number of rows and where x=1 to M and M is the total number of columns.




The use of memory cells


102


as programmed elements in the FPGA


100


of

FIG. 1

is advantageous because the components can be fabricated using many conventional CMOS processes using only a single polysilicon deposition step, without adding any mask steps to them. This is in contrast to “floating gate” type FPGA flash memory, which requires at least two polysilicon layers. This is also in contrast to the anti-fuse type FPGA, which requires special process steps. Further, with modern technological advances, the size of a capacitor and transistor can be made very small. For example, current 0.18 micron, 0.13 micron, and smaller line width processes would greatly increase the density of the FPGA.




Although only a two by two FPGA array


100


is shown, in practice such FPGA arrays may contain tens of thousands cells, or even millions of cells, when fabricated using, for example, an advanced 0.13 μm CMOS logic process. Even larger arrays will be realized as CMOS logic processes improve further.





FIG. 2

shows a partial layout diagram


200


for a portion of the FPGA array


100


. The layout diagram of

FIG. 2

is suitable for an advanced CMOS logic process. The term MOS is commonly understood to pertain to any gate material, including doped polysilicon and other good conductors, as well as to various different types of gate dielectrics not limited to silicon dioxide, and the term is so used herein. For example, the dielectric may be any type of dielectric, such as an oxide or nitride, which undergoes a hard or soft breakdown upon the application of a voltage for a period of time. In one embodiment, a thermally grown gate silicon oxide of about 50 angstroms (50 A for 0.25 μm, 30 A for 0.18 μm and 20 A for 0.13 μm process) thick is used.




The FPGA array


100


preferably is laid out in a grid in which the column lines such as C


1


and C


2


, are orthogonal to the row lines such as R


1


and R


2


.

FIG. 2

shows two cells


102


, arrayed as one column by two rows. As seen in

FIG. 2

, the metal one (M


1


) line is used to connect the gate of the switch (SW) with one terminal of the capacitor


106


.




Further, the drain of the select transistor (ST and


104


) is connected to the word line through a n


+


diffusion contact, metal one, via one, and metal two (M


2


). Further, it can be seen that all of the devices (select transistor


104


, capacitor


106


, and switch


108


) are formed from a polysilicon layer over a low voltage (LV) oxide.




The operation of the FPGA array


100


is now explained with reference to the illustrative voltages shown in FIG.


3


. It will be appreciated that the voltages are illustrative, and that different voltages are likely to be used in different applications or when different process technologies are used. During programming, the various cells in the FPGA array


100


are exposed to one of four possible programming voltage combinations, which are shown on lines


301


,


303


,


305


, and


307


of FIG.


3


. Read voltages are shown on lines


309


,


311


,


313


, and


315


. Assume that a FPGA cell


102


(note that the cell


102


in

FIG. 2

is a generic reference to all of the cells in the FPGA


100


) is selected for programming and is located at the crosspoint of R


1


and C


1


. The selected memory cell


102


is referred to as at the selected row and selected column (“SR/SC”). As shown on line


301


, the voltage on the selected wordline R


1


(designated as V


wl


or “voltage on the wordline”) is 0 volts and the voltage on the bitline C


1


(designated as V


bl


or “voltage on the bitline”) is 8 volts. Further, the voltage on the selected read bitline (designated as V


blr


or “voltage on the read bitline”) is 3.3 volts.




This set of voltages results in the select transistor


104


being “on”, which places 0 volts from the word line onto one terminal of the capacitor


106


. The other terminal of the capacitor


106


is connected to the bitline (V


bl


) which is at 8 volts. Thus, the voltage across the capacitor


106


is 8 volts. The gate oxide of the capacitor


106


is designed to break down at this potential difference, which programs the FPGA cell as will be described further below. When the oxide of the capacitor


106


breaks down, this converts the capacitor


106


into a resistor.




It can be appreciated that the precise magnitude of voltages applied is dependent upon the thickness of the gate oxide and other factors. Thus, for example, for a 0.13 micron CMOS process, the gate oxide is typically thinner, thereby requiring a lower voltage differential across the capacitor


106


.




With R


1


and C


1


being the selected row and column, consider the impact on the FPGA cell


102


at the crosspoint of a selected row and an unselected column (“SR/UC”), e.g., R


1


and C


2


. As shown on line


305


, the voltage on the wordline R


1


is 0 volts, the voltage at the unselected read bitline (V


blr


) is 0 and the voltage on the unselected bitline C


2


is 0. Because 0 volts is on the gate of the select transistor


104


, the FPGA cell


102


does not program under these conditions.




With R


1


and C


1


being the selected row and column, consider the impact on the FPGA cell


102


at the crosspoint of a selected column and an unselected row (“UR/SC”), e.g. R


2


and C


1


. As shown on line


303


, the voltage on the unselected wordline R


2


is 3.3 volts, the voltage at the selected read bitline (V


blr


) is 3.3 volts, and the voltage on the bit line C


1


is 8 volts. Because the read bitline voltage is 3.3 volts, this causes the select transistor


104


to be in an “on” condition, allowing the 3.3 volts on the word line to be placed on one terminal of the capacitor


106


. The other terminal of the capacitor is tied to the voltage on the bitline, or in this case 8 volts. This causes a potential difference of 4.7 volts across the gate oxide of the capacitor


106


. The memory cell


102


is designed to not program under these conditions.




With R


1


and C


1


being the selected row and column, consider the impact on the FPGA cell


102


at the crosspoint of an unselected column and an unselected row (“UR/UC”), e.g. R


2


and C


2


. As shown on line


307


, the voltage on the unselected wordline R


2


is 3.3 volts, the voltage at the unselected read bitline (V


blr


) is 0 volts, and the voltage on the unselected bitline C


2


is 0 volts. Because 0 volts is on the gate of the select transistor


104


, the select transistor is in the “off” position, leaving one terminal of the capacitor


106


floating. The other terminal of the capacitor


106


is at 0 volts by virtue of its connection to the bitline. FPGA cell


102


does not program under these conditions.




After a FPGA cell


102


has been programmed by breaking down the gate oxide of the capacitor


106


, the physical characteristics of the cell


102


is changed. In particular, the capacitor


106


becomes a resistive element. Note that, during programming, although the voltage across the select transistor oxide (i.e. 3.3 volts on the gate of the select transistor


104


) is larger than is typical (1.8 volts for 0.18 micron CMOS), this higher voltage will not break down the gate oxide of the select transistor


104


because of the short programming time (normally less than a few seconds).




The FPGA array


100


is read in the following manner. A read select voltage of 1.8-3.3 volts is placed on the selected column bitline (“SC”), a read select voltage of 1.8 volts is placed on the selected bitline read (V


blr


), and a voltage of 0 volts is placed on the selected row wordline (“SR”). Note that these voltages are for a typical 0.18 micron CMOS process. Lower voltages would be typically used for smaller more advanced CMOS processes. For example, for a 0.13 micron CMOS process, the read select voltage on the selected column bitline and on the selected read bitline may be approximately 1.2 volts.




Assume that R


1


and C


1


are the selected row and column (“SC/SR”) and that the FPGA cell


102


at that crosspoint is programmed. As shown on line


309


, 1.8-3.3 volts (a read select voltage) is applied via bitline C


1


to one terminal of the capacitor


106


. Note that a higher bitline voltage will enable a higher read current to be sensed from the bitline. Further, the gate of the select transistor


104


has applied 1.8 volts via the read bitline and 0 volts is applied to the drain of the select transistor


104


via the wordline R


1


. This causes the select transistor


104


to be “on”. Nevertheless, even though the select transistor is “on”, there is still some amount of resistance across the select transistor. Furthermore, there is 1.8-3.3 volts across the capacitor


106


, which if programmed, will cause a leakage current (typically over 10 microamps) to flow from the selected column bitline to the selected row wordline. In effect, the programmed capacitor


106


and the select transistor


104


form a voltage divider, whose middle node is connected to the gate of the switch


108


. The result of this voltage divider is that a voltage is placed on the gate of the switch


108


sufficient to turn on the switch


108


. If the cell


102


has not been previously programmed, the capacitor


106


has a much higher resistance than the select transistor


104


. Further, because the select transistor


104


is turned on, this causes the wordline voltage of 0 volts to be placed on the switch


108


, which causes the switch


108


to be off




With R


1


and C


1


being the selected row and column for the read operation, consider the impact on the cell


102


at the crosspoint of a selected column and an unselected row (“UR/SC”), e.g. R


2


and C


1


. As shown on line


311


, 1.8-3.3 volts (a read select voltage) is applied via bitline C


1


to one terminal of the capacitor


106


. Further, the gate of the select transistor


104


has applied 1.8 volts via the read bitline and 1.8 volts is applied to the source of the select transistor


104


via the wordline R


1


. This causes the select transistor


104


to be “off”.




With R


1


and C


1


being the selected row and column for the read operation, consider the impact on the cell


102


at the crosspoint of an unselected column and a selected row (“SR/UC”), e.g. R


1


and C


2


. As shown on line


313


, 0 volts (a read select voltage) is applied via bitline C


2


to one terminal of the capacitor


106


. Further, the gate of the select transistor


104


has applied 0 volts via the read bitline and 0 volts is applied to the drain/source of the select transistor


104


via the wordline R


1


. Under these circumstances, there will no current flow from the wordline to the bitline.




With R


1


and C


1


being the selected row and column for the read operation, consider the impact on the cell


102


at the crosspoint of an unselected column and a selected row (“UR/UC”), e.g. R


2


and C


2


. As shown on line


315


, 0 volts (a read select voltage) is applied via bitline C


2


to one terminal of the capacitor


106


. Further, the gate of the select transistor


104


has applied 0 volts via the read bitline and 1.8 volts is applied to the drain/source of the select transistor


104


via the wordline R


2


. Under these circumstances, since the selected device


104


is at off state, there will no current flow from the wordline to the bitline.




During operation, the following voltages are used. First, a wordline voltage of 0 volts is applied. Next, a bitline voltage of 1.8 volts is applied and a bitline read voltage of 0.3 to 0.8 volts is applied. The V


blr


of 0.3 to 0.8 volts is applied to make the select transistor


104


operate in a weakly on state, so only minimal leakage current occurs (on the order of nA).




In the embodiment described in

FIGS. 1-3

, the gate voltage of the switch


108


will be generally equal or less that V


cc


(1.8 volts for a 0.18 micron CMOS process). Thus, the switch


108


can only pass V


cc


-V


t


. This will affect the speed performance of the FPGA circuit. In an alternative embodiment, the switch


108


and the select transistor


104


have their gate oxides formed thicker, such as that used in input/output devices. For example, the thickness of the gate oxides for the switch


108


and the select transistor


104


may be on the order of 60 angstroms or thicker. The gate oxide of the capacitor


106


should be maintained at the conventional thickness for the particular CMOS process, e.g. 30 angstroms for a 0.18 CMOS process. The programming and read voltages for this alternative embodiment are shown in FIG.


4


.




In this alternative embodiment, during the read and programming operations, the bitline voltage can be biased to 3.3 volts (compared to 1.8 volts in the embodiment of FIGS.


1


-


3


). The switch


108


will have 3.3 volts on its gate, so it can fully pass a V


cc


with extra drive gate voltage. Thus, the programmed switch will have very low resistance so as to improve the speed performance.




Various studies of oxide breakdown, which were performed in contexts different than the cells


102


shown in the array


100


, indicate suitable voltage levels for breaking down ultra-thin gate oxides and establishing that the breakdown is controllable. When an ultra-thin gate oxide is exposed to voltage-induced stress, breakdown in the gate oxide occurs. Although the actual mechanisms leading to the intrinsic breakdown of gate oxide are not well understood, the breakdown process is a progressive process passing through a soft breakdown (“SBD”) stage followed by a hard breakdown (“HBD”) stage. One cause of breakdown is believed to be oxide defect sites. These may act alone to cause breakdown, or may trap charges and thereby cause high local fields and currents and a positive feedback condition that leads to thermal runaway. Improved fabrication processes resulting in fewer oxide defects are reducing the occurrence of this type of breakdown. Another cause of breakdown is believed to be electron and hole trapping at various sites even in defect-free oxide, which also leads to thermal runaway.




Rasras et al. performed a carrier separation experiment which demonstrated that, under positive gate bias, impact ionization of the electrons in the substrate is the dominant source of the substrate hole current. Mahmoud Rasras, Ingrid De Wolf, Guido Groeseneken, Robin Degraeve, Herman e. Maes, Substrate Hole Current Origin after Oxide Breakdown, EDM 00-537, 2000. A constant voltage stress experiment was performed on ultra-thin oxide in an arrangement in which channel inversion was involved, and established that both SBD and HBD may be used for storing data, and that a desired degree of SBD or HBD may be obtained by controlling the time over which the gate oxide storage element is stressed.

FIG. 5

shows a schematic cross-sectional representation of the experimental setup. The effect of the constant voltage stress on the ultra-thin gate oxide is shown in the graph of

FIG. 6

, in which the x-axis is time in seconds and the y-axis is current in amperes expressed logarithmically.

FIG. 8

shows the gate and substrate hole current measured before and after soft and hard breakdown under constant voltage stress. For roughly 12.5 seconds, the total current is substantially constant and dominated by an electron current as measured by I


g


. The leakage is believed to be due to Fowler-Nordheim (“FN”) tunneling and stress-induced leakage current (“SILC”). At about 12.5 seconds, a large jump in the measured substrate hole current is observed, which signals the onset of a soft breakdown (“SBD”). The total current remains substantially constant at this new level, albeit with some fluctuation in the substrate current, from about 12.5 seconds to about 19 seconds. At about 19 seconds, large jumps in both the electron current and the substrate hole current signal the onset of hard breakdown (“HBD”).

FIG. 6

shows that a desired degree of SBD or HBD may be obtained by controlling the time over which the gate oxide storage element is stressed.




Sune et al. studied post SBD conduction in ultra-thin silicon dioxide films. Jordi Sune, Enrique Miranda, Post Soft Breakdown conduction in SiO2 Gate Oxides, IEDM 00-533, 2000. Various stages in the current-voltage (“I-V”) characteristics of an ultra-thin gate oxide as degradation proceeds are shown in

FIG. 7

, in which the x-axis is voltage in volts and the y-axis is current in amperes expressed logarithmically.

FIG. 7

shows that a broad range of voltages may be used to program the gate oxide storage element, and that either SBD or HBD may be used to store information in the gate oxide storage element. Several post breakdown I-V characteristics are also included that show the evolution from SBD to HBD. The amount of the leakage current resulting at SBD and HBD as well as at the intermediate situations between these two extremes is roughly linearly dependent on the magnitude of the voltage in a range of about 2.5 volts to 6 volts.




Wu et al. studied the voltage dependency of voltage acceleration for ultra-thin oxides. E. Y. Wu et al., Voltage-Dependent Voltage-Acceleration of Oxide Breakdown for Ultra-Thin Oxides, IEDM 00-541, 2000.

FIG. 10

is a graph of time-to-breakdown at 63% distribution vs. gate voltage in a semi-log scale measured n channel FETs (inversion) for oxide thickness varying from 2.3 nm to 5.0 nm. The distributions are in general agreement and are linear, further indicating that the process is controllable.




Miranda et al. measured the I-V characteristics of nMOSFET devices having an oxide thickness of 3 nm and an area of 6.4×10


−5


cm


2


after the detection of successive breakdown events. Miranda et al., “Analytic Modeling of Leakage Current Through Multiple Breakdown Paths in SiO


2


Films”, IEEE 39


th


Annual International Reliability Physics Symposium, Orlando, Fla., 2001, pp 367-379.

FIG. 9

shows the results corresponding to the linear regime in which “N” is the number of conducting channels. The results are quite linear, indicating that the path is essentially resistive.




The transistor used in the memory cells described herein in most cases are normal low voltage logic transistors having, for example, an ultra-thin gate oxide thickness on the order of 50 Å for a 0.25 μm process, or on the order of 20 Å for a 0.13 μm process. The voltage across such an ultra-thin gate oxide can be temporarily during programming much higher than V


cc


, which typically is 2.5 volts for an integrated circuit fabricated with a 0.25 μm process, and 1.2 volts for an integrated circuit fabricated with a 0.13 μm process. Such ultra-thin oxides typically can stand up to as much as 4 or 5 volts without significant degradation on the transistor performance.




The description of the invention and its applications as set forth herein is illustrative and is not intended to limit the scope of the invention. Variations and modifications of the embodiments disclosed herein are possible, and practical alternatives to and equivalents of the various elements of the embodiments are known to those of ordinary skill in the art. For example, the various voltages set forth in the various examples are only illustrative, since one has some discretion as to the precise voltage to select within a range of voltages, and the voltages are in any event dependent on the device characteristics. The terms row wordline and column bitline have been used to describe types of lines commonly used in memories, but some memories may have alternatives thereto. Further, the various doping types may be reversed, such that an n-channel transistor described above may be replaced with a p-channel transistor. These and other variations and modifications of the embodiments disclosed herein may be made without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention.



Claims
  • 1. A field programmable gate array (FPGA) cell useful in a FPGA array having column bitlines, read bitlines, and row wordlines, the cell comprising:a capacitor having a first terminal and a second terminal, the first terminal connected to a column bitline, said second terminal connected to a switch control node, said capacitor having a dielectric between said first terminal and said second terminal; a select transistor having a gate, a source, and a drain, said gate connected to said read bitline, said source connected to said switch control node, and said drain connected to a row wordline; and a switch being controlled by said switch control node.
  • 2. The cell of claim 1 wherein said switch is a MOSFET and a gate of said MOSFET being connected to said switch control node.
  • 3. The cell of claim 2 wherein said switch and said select transistor have gate oxides that are thicker than the dielectric of said capacitor.
  • 4. The cell of claim 1 wherein said first terminal of said capacitor, said gate of said select transistor and a gate of said switch is formed from the same layer of polysilicon.
  • 5. The cell of claim 1 wherein a first metal layer connects said switch control node and said gate of said switch.
  • 6. The cell of claim 3 wherein said gate oxides of said switch and select transistor are the thickness of input/output transistors for the CMOS process.
  • 7. A method of operating a field programmable gate array (FPGA) comprising a plurality of row wordlines, a plurality of column bitlines, a plurality of read bitlines, and a plurality of FPGA cells at respective crosspoints of the row lines and column bitlines, said cells comprising a capacitor having a first terminal and a second terminal, the first terminal connected to a column bitline, said second terminal connected to a switch control node, said capacitor having a dielectric between said first terminal and said second terminal, a select transistor having a gate, a source, and a drain, said gate connected to said read bitline, said source connected to said switch control node, and said drain connected to a row wordline, and a switch being controlled by said switch control node, the method comprising:applying a first voltage to a selected one of the column bitlines and gate of a selected one of said select transistor; and applying a second voltage to a selected one of the row wordlines; wherein the first voltage and the second voltage form a potential difference across the dielectric of said capacitor to break down said dielectric converting said capacitor into a resistive device.
  • 8. The method of claim 7 further including applying a third voltage on the row wordlines not corresponding to said selected select transistor.
  • 9. The method of claim 7 wherein said selected select transistor is read by applying a fourth voltage on the gate of said selected select transistor and on said column bitline.
  • 10. The method of claim 9 further including applying a fifth voltage on the row wordlines not corresponding to said selected select transistor.
  • 11. A field programmable gate array (FPGA) comprising a plurality of row wordlines, a plurality of column bitlines, a plurality of read bitlines, and a plurality of cells at respective crosspoints of the row wordlines and column bitlines, each of the cells comprising:a capacitor having a first terminal and a second terminal, the first terminal connected to a column bitline, said second terminal connected to a switch control node, said capacitor having a dielectric between said first terminal and said second terminal; a select transistor having a gate, a source, and a drain, said gate connected to said a read bitline, said source connected to said switch control node, and said drain connected to a row wordline; and a switch being controlled by said switch control node.
  • 12. The cell of claim 11 wherein said switch is a MOSFET and a gate of said MOSFET being connected to said switch control node.
  • 13. The cell of claim 12 wherein said switch and said select transistor have gate oxides that are thicker than the dielectric of said capacitor.
  • 14. The cell of claim 11 wherein said first terminal of said capacitor, said gate of said select transistor and a gate of said switch is formed from the same layer of polysilicon.
  • 15. The cell of claim 11 wherein a first metal layer connects said switch control node and said gate of said switch.
  • 16. The cell of claim 13 wherein said gate oxides of said switch and select transistor are the thickness of input/output transistors for the CMOS process.
US Referenced Citations (40)
Number Name Date Kind
3634929 Yoshida et al. Jan 1972 A
4322822 McPherson Mar 1982 A
4488262 Basire et al. Dec 1984 A
4490900 Chiu Jan 1985 A
4502208 McPherson Mar 1985 A
4507757 McElroy Mar 1985 A
4543594 Mohsen et al. Sep 1985 A
4546273 Osman Oct 1985 A
4613886 Chwang Sep 1986 A
4823181 Mohsen et al. Apr 1989 A
4876220 Mohsen et al. Oct 1989 A
4899205 Hamdy et al. Feb 1990 A
4943538 Mohsen et al. Jul 1990 A
4962342 Mead et al. Oct 1990 A
5138410 Takebuchi Aug 1992 A
5304871 Dharmarajan et al. Apr 1994 A
5412244 Hamdy et al. May 1995 A
5496756 Sharma et al. Mar 1996 A
5576568 Kowshik Nov 1996 A
5578848 Kwong et al. Nov 1996 A
5587603 Kowshik Dec 1996 A
5600265 El Gamal et al. Feb 1997 A
5675541 Leterrier Oct 1997 A
5675547 Koga Oct 1997 A
5825200 Kolze Oct 1998 A
5825201 Kolze Oct 1998 A
5880512 Gordon et al. Mar 1999 A
5909049 McCollum Jun 1999 A
6034893 Mehta Mar 2000 A
6064595 Logie et al. May 2000 A
6084428 Kolze et al. Jul 2000 A
6097077 Gordon et al. Aug 2000 A
6157568 Schmidt Dec 2000 A
6214666 Mehta Apr 2001 B1
6215140 Reisinger et al. Apr 2001 B1
6232631 Schmidt et al. May 2001 B1
6282123 Mehta Aug 2001 B1
6294809 Logie Sep 2001 B1
6297103 Ahn et al. Oct 2001 B1
6421293 Candelier et al. Jul 2002 B1
Non-Patent Literature Citations (5)
Entry
Miranda, Enrique et al; Analytic Modeling of leakage Current Through Multiple Breakdown Paths in Si02 Films; 39th Annual International Reliability Physics Symposium; Orlando, FL 2001.
Lombardo, S. et al; Softening of Breakdown in Ultra-Thin Gate Oxide nMOSFET's at Low Inversion Layer Density; 39th Annual International Reliabilty Physics Symposium; Orlando, FL 2001.
Wu, E.W. et al; Voltage-Dependent Voltage-Acceleration of Oxide Breakdown for Ultra-Thin Oxides; IEEE, 2000.
Rasras, Mahmoud et al; Substrate Hole Current Origin After Oxide Breakdown; IEEE, 2000.
Sune, Jordi et al; Post Soft Breakdown Conduction in Si02 Gate Oxides; IEEE, 2000.