An optical system incorporating a field widening lens is provided. More particularly, interferometric systems in which at least some of the flat mirrors of conventional optical systems are replaced by curved mirrors are provided.
Large field of view is a critical parameter for the implementation of many optical systems. For example, practical implementations of high spectral resolution space based optical systems, such as direct detection Doppler wind lidars, require a receiver field of view (FOV) large enough to encompass a laser beam of sufficient divergence as to meet near surface eye-safety requirements, and allow for reasonable thermal wander between the receiver and transmitter optic axes. Typically, this receiver FOV is on the order of 100 microradians. Furthermore, to acquire sufficient signal from orbit, large collection optics on the order of 1 meter diameter are required. To minimize mass, volume, and cost of the interferometer components, the large diameter beam from the collection telescope is typically recollimated to the smaller diameter of practical interferometer optics, typically 50 mm or less. Because the étendu or optical throughput of optical systems is conserved, the product of the beam diameter and its divergence remains a fixed property of the system. Consequently, a magnified field angle (order of several milliradians) is experienced within the interferometer. In general, the spectral or phase resolution of interferometers is dependent on the angular divergence of the light propagating within the interferometric path because rays of different angles traverse different path lengths producing wavefront or phase errors. Therefore, as field of view of the system increases, the spectral and phase resolution of the system decrease.
Techniques for widening the operative field of view of optical devices have been developed and proposed. For example, field widened interferometers have used combinations of different types of glass to compensate interferometer path length changes with field angle. However, the use of large blocks of glass results in the absorption and scattering of optical signals, limiting operational wavelengths. In addition, the blocks of glass typically have limited index of refraction homogeneity, affecting intra-interferometer wavefront and resolution. In addition, the use of large blocks of glass implies increased mass, which is a particular disadvantage in connection with optical systems intended for airborne or space borne deployment. Accordingly, while such refractive compensation can be effective at improving contrast for larger field of view instruments, they are incapable of improving the effect of wavefront error, and can in fact increase such error. In addition, for large optical path differences, the refractive method requires adding large amounts of refractive material, which can itself reduce contrast because of refractive index inhomogeneities, in some cases due to thermal gradients in the large glass blocks. Thus, in large optical path difference interferometers (i.e. high spectral and phase resolution), the refractive method compounds the effect of poor wavefront error, since the wavefront from short and long arms can be substantially different, resulting in low contrast fringes. In addition, refractive solutions are not practical at ultraviolet wavelengths, where glass absorption is high, and such solutions complicate multiple simultaneous wavelength operation due to dispersion.
Cat's eye mirrors that alter the optical path length traversed by optical rays across the field of view of an instrument have been made. However, these systems have an obscuration when implemented as part of a Michelson interferometer, and, by symmetry, cannot use phase mask, or phase mirror technology that is essential for high speed applications. Moreover, the obscuration means that any sufficiently complicated wavefront will not be invariant (i.e., the input and output will not be identical). This is a particularly important effect if the input light is from a multimode optical fiber, where the wavefront is extremely complicated and where any diffraction losses, such as occur at an obscuration, quickly alter the shape and phase of the wavefront. In addition, tolerance to front end optical wavefront errors is particularly important in controlling the cost and mass of signal collection and routing optics.
A standard (flat mirror) Michelson or Mach-Zehnder interferometer works well with larger fields of view and significant wavefront error only if the optical path difference within the instrument is small. With moderately large optical path difference (for increased spectral and phase sensitivity), as the field of view increases or the incident wavefront worsens, the interferogram contrast degrades. The primary problem has been increasing the optical path difference while maintaining a moderately high field of view, without the need for an input signal with a high quality wavefront. Other problems include simultaneous or sequential operation at multiple wavelengths and at high speed to accommodate usual lidar (light detection and ranging) return signals. Still another problem is calibration of the interferometer at a high data rate without introducing additional losses.
Accordingly, it would be desirable to provide an interferometer that is spectrally sensitive while simultaneously operating at high speed, with a moderate field of view, and at multiple wavelengths, with possibly poor wavefront quality or a highly speckled multi-mode fiber input. It would also be desirable to provide optical systems, including interferometers that provide high contrast and resolution even with a large field of view in single pixel and imaging systems.
Methods and apparatuses directed to solving these and other problems and disadvantages of the prior art are provided. In particular, a field widening lens or cat's eye optical system is provided. The field widening lens provides a reimaging system such that the incident wavefront is reproduced at the exit of the optical system or at the exit of the portion of the optical system comprising the field widening lens. For example, the incident wavefront is reproduced at the exit of each arm of a Michelson or Mach-Zehnder interferometer incorporating the field widening lens of embodiments of the present invention. Specifically, the field widening lens reimages the input at the output. More specifically, the output image can be a conjugate of the input image. Therefore, in a multiple arm interferometer, the wavefront and intensity variation from each arm matches, and therefore a high contrast interference pattern is produced. In addition, the field widening mirror assembly performs angle compensation so that the path length of rays in the field widening lens are the same over the operative field of view of the instrument or optical system, regardless of the input angle of the ray with respect to the central axis of the field of view of the optical system. Embodiments of the present invention also eliminate the obscuration present in a conventional system incorporating a cat's eye mirror, and provide different input and output paths.
A dual field widening lens assembly interferometer in accordance with at least some embodiments of the present invention includes multiple field widening lenses, each having a powered primary and a flat or powered secondary reflector. Such a lens assembly is sometimes referred to as a cat's eye reflector. The multiple field widening lenses can comprise the arms of an unequal path length interferometer. In accordance with other embodiments of the present invention, the field widening lenses can provide equal or symmetrical path lengths, for example as part of an etalon. In accordance with still other embodiments of the present invention, one arm or segment of an interferometer may feature a cat's eye reflector, while the other arm or segment may comprise a planar primary reflector or mirror. In general, a field widening lens in accordance with embodiments of the present invention provides an optical path difference that is zero or substantially zero for any light that is within the field of view of the optical system that includes the field widening lens. As used herein, an optical path difference is negligible (i.e., is essentially or substantially zero) if the maximum difference in path length for any two rays within the FOV of the field widening lens is less than ¼ wave of the shortest wavelength being investigated.
The provision of a field widening lens that removes the obscuration present in conventional cat's eye systems allows the output from the field widening lens to be identical, or more nearly identical, to the input. For example, diffraction losses, such as occurs at an obscuration, and that alter the mode, shape and phase of a wavefront caused by the obscuration, can be eliminated. In addition, by providing offset input and output ports, the design of an optical system incorporating a field widening lens in accordance with embodiments of the present invention can be simplified. The multiple input and output ports available using at least some embodiments of the present invention also facilitate the incorporation of the field widening lens into optical devices requiring multiple inputs and outputs.
Additional features and advantages of embodiments of the present invention will become more readily apparent from the following description, particularly when taken together with the accompanying drawings.
As shown, light comprising an image 208 enters through the input port 210 and travels along a first ray segment 220 between the input port 210 and a first portion 224 of the primary mirror 204. The light comprising the image is reflected from the first portion 224 of the primary mirror 204 along a second segment 228 to the secondary mirror 216. The secondary mirror 216 reflects the light comprising the image along a third segment 232 to a second portion 236 of the primary mirror 204. The light comprising the image is then reflected from the second portion 236 of the primary mirror 204 to the output port 214 along a fourth segment 240, to provide the reimaged and preserved wavefront as part of the conjugate image 212 that is output by the field widening lens 108. In addition, the input port 210 is offset from the output port 214, and separate input and output paths are provided.
As noted, the OPD for any ray within the field of view or operative field of view of the optical system 104 is zero or essentially zero. For example, the OPD for ray A 240, originating from a first point at a first angle with respect to the central axis 116 of the field of view 112, as it travels between the input 210 and the output 214, is the same as the OPD for ray B 244, originating from a second point at a second angle with respect to the central axis 116 of the field of view 112, as it travels between the input 210 and the output 214.
In addition, the interferometer 304 provides a second input port 210b and a second output port 214b. Accordingly, such a configuration can facilitate the injection of a reference signal and/or the inclusion of multiple detectors.
Linearly polarized light from the polarizing beam splitter 516 passed through a half wave plate 528, which rotates the polarization of the light from the polarizing beam splitter 516 by 45°. Other well known methods can be used to perform the rotation of the polarization states, for example, physical rotation of the optical path. Next, a first non-polarizing 50% beam splitter 532 divides the light, and directs one half of the light along a long arm 536 and the other half of the light along a short arm 540 of the optical autocovariance interferometer 504. The light in each arm comprises orthogonal polarizations, each containing one half the light directed to the respective arm. The light directed along the long arm 536 can be passed through a quarter wave plate 544 aligned so as to shift the phase of the light in one of the polarizations propagating in the long arm 536 by 90° with respect to the other polarization in that arm. As can be appreciated by one of skill in the art after consideration of the present disclosure, alternatively the quarter wave plate can be positioned so that the phase of one of the polarizations of light directed along the short arm 540 is shifted by 90°.
The long arm 536 of the optical autocovariance interferometer 504 comprises the first field widening lens 108a. Accordingly, the long arm 536 includes a first primary mirror 204a and a first secondary mirror 216a. The first primary mirror 204a receives light that has been directed to it by the first non-polarizing 50% beam splitter 532 at a first portion 224a of the first primary mirror 204a, and reflects that light to the first secondary mirror 216a. The first secondary mirror 216a in turn reflects that light back to the first primary mirror 204a. More particularly, light is reflected by the first secondary mirror 216a to a second portion 236a of the first primary mirror 204a. The first primary mirror 204a then reflects that light to a second non-polarizing 50% beam splitter 548. As with other cat's eye assemblies 108 in accordance with embodiments of the present invention, the distance traveled by any ray within the first field widening lens 108a is the same, regardless of the angle of incidence of the ray relative to the optical system 104, provided the ray is within the field of view 112 of the optical system 104.
The short arm 540 of the optical autocovariance interferometer 504 comprises the second field widening lens 108b. The short arm 540 therefore includes a second primary mirror 204b and a second secondary mirror 216b. The second primary mirror 204b receives light that has been directed to it by the first non-polarizing 50% beam splitter 532 at a first portion 224b of the second primary mirror 204b, and reflects that light to the second secondary mirror 216b. The second secondary mirror 216b in turn reflects that light back to a second portion 236b of the second primary mirror 204b. The second primary mirror 204b then reflects that light to a second face of the second non-polarizing 50% beam splitter that is orthogonal to the face of the second non-polarizing 50% beam splitter 548 to which the light from the long arm 536 is directed. Accordingly, the light from the two arms, 536 and 540 of the OA interferometer 504 mixes and interferes at the second non-polarizing 50% beam splitter 548. Again, as with other field widening lenses 108 in accordance with embodiments of the present invention, the distance traveled by any ray within the second field widening lens 108b is the same or essentially the same, regardless of the angle of incidence of the ray relative to the optical system 104, provided the ray is within the field of view 112 of the optical system 104. As a result, the wave front of the incoming signal is preserved by the cat's eye assemblies 108, thus providing an output that is a 1:1 conjugate of the input. Moreover, this aspect of embodiments of the present invention allows an interference pattern having good contrast and resolution to be provided.
As noted, the example optical system 104 illustrated in
As can be appreciated by one of skill in the art, light at certain equally spaced apart wavelengths will constructively interfere within the etalon 604 and pass through the partially reflective second primary mirror 204b through an output port 612. The length of the path followed by light entering the etalon 604, from the entrance or input port 608 to the exit or output port 612 is the same regardless of the field angle of the light within the field of view 112 of the optical instrument 104. The input port 608 and the output port 612 are offset from one another. The etalon 604 can include or be associated with compensation optics 616 to correct for the negative lensing effect in transmission through the primary mirrors 204. Rejected light can exit the etalon 604 through alternate paths 620.
In
Although particular embodiments of field widening lenses 108 in accordance with embodiments of the present invention have been illustrated and described, it should be appreciated that other embodiments are possible. For instance, an optical system 104 comprising an interferometer can include a first non-planar primary mirror 204 that operates in cooperation with a secondary mirror 208 to provide a field widening lens assembly 108, and a second planar primary mirror. In addition, although embodiments have been described as incorporating unitary primary mirrors 204, since at least some embodiments of the present utilize separate portions of the primary mirror 208, a primary mirror 208 can be provided in multiple parts.
The foregoing discussion of the invention has been presented for purposes of illustration and description. Further, the description is not intended to limit the invention to the form disclosed herein. Consequently, variations and modifications commensurate with the above teachings, within the skill or knowledge of the relevant art, are within the scope of the present invention. The embodiments described hereinabove are further intended to explain the best mode presently known of practicing the invention and to enable others skilled in the art to utilize the invention in such or in other embodiments and with various modifications required by the particular application or use of the invention. It is intended that the appended claims be construed to include alternative embodiments to the extent permitted by the prior art.
This is a divisional application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/390,226, filed Feb. 20, 2009, the entire disclosure of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4022532 | Montagnino | May 1977 | A |
4201468 | Margolis et al. | May 1980 | A |
4286877 | Clarke | Sep 1981 | A |
4730320 | Hidaka et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
5029023 | Bearden et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5091778 | Keeler | Feb 1992 | A |
5192978 | Keeler | Mar 1993 | A |
5317376 | Amzajerdi et al. | May 1994 | A |
5345304 | Allen | Sep 1994 | A |
5357371 | Minott | Oct 1994 | A |
5485009 | Meyzonnetie et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5682225 | DuBois et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5682229 | Wangler | Oct 1997 | A |
5784023 | Bluege | Jul 1998 | A |
5793034 | Wesolowicz et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5815250 | Thomson et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5847816 | Zediker et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5870180 | Wangler | Feb 1999 | A |
5870181 | Andressen | Feb 1999 | A |
5914776 | Streicher | Jun 1999 | A |
5917596 | Jenkins et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5923466 | Krause et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
6034770 | Kim et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6173066 | Peurach et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6323941 | Evans et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6411871 | Lin | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6414746 | Stettner et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6434211 | Lloyd et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6448572 | Tennant et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6542831 | Moosmuller et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6608669 | Holton et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6646725 | Eichinger et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6657733 | Drake | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6664529 | Pack et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6665063 | Jamieson et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6747258 | Benz et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6804607 | Wood | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6943868 | Haig | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6972887 | Wickham et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7006203 | Book et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7095488 | Jamieson et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7113886 | West | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7142981 | Hablani | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7224466 | Ray | May 2007 | B2 |
7224707 | Gendron | May 2007 | B2 |
7236235 | Dimsdale | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7240879 | Cepollina et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7277641 | Gleckman | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7342228 | O'Connell et al. | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7345743 | Hartman et al. | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7359057 | Schwiesow | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7397568 | Bryce et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7406220 | Christensen et al. | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7436494 | Kennedy et al. | Oct 2008 | B1 |
7453552 | Miesak et al. | Nov 2008 | B1 |
7580132 | Baillon et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
20020117340 | Stettner | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030063884 | Smith et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20040021852 | DeFlumere | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040119838 | Griffis et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040130702 | Jupp et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040213463 | Morrison | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050060092 | Hablani | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050099634 | Dubois et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20060088946 | Willson et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060114447 | Harris et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060132752 | Kane | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060136172 | O'Kane et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060197936 | Liebman et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070073486 | Tillotson et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070110364 | Rice et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070115541 | Rogers et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070122001 | Wang et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070171407 | Cole et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070263676 | Beukema et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080023587 | Head et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080136626 | Hudson et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080212328 | Minano et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080273560 | Stelmakh | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080290259 | Mathewson et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080316498 | Drake et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090002680 | Ruff et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090046289 | Caldwell et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090059201 | Willner et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090110267 | Zakhor et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090115994 | Stettner et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090142066 | Leclair et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090237640 | Krikorian et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090273770 | Bauhahn et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090310118 | Halldorsson | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100165323 | Fiess et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2300325 | Oct 1996 | GB |
2306828 | May 1997 | GB |
2364840 | Feb 2002 | GB |
WO 0204982 | Jan 2002 | WO |
WO 02065155 | Aug 2002 | WO |
WO 2007081628 | Jul 2007 | WO |
WO 2009133414 | Nov 2009 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12390226 | Feb 2009 | US |
Child | 13043279 | US |