Patent Grant
12082821
Embodiments of devices and methods herein are directed to blocking a flow of fluid through a tubular vessel or into a small interior chamber of a saccular cavity or vascular defect within a mammalian body. More specifically, embodiments herein are directed to devices and methods for treatment of a vascular defect of a patient including some embodiments directed specifically to the treatment of cerebral aneurysms of patients.
The mammalian circulatory system is comprised of a heart, which acts as a pump, and a system of blood vessels which transport the blood to various points in the body. Due to the force exerted by the flowing blood on the blood vessel the blood vessels may develop a variety of vascular defects. One common vascular defect known as an aneurysm results from the abnormal widening of the blood vessel. Typically, vascular aneurysms are formed as a result of the weakening of the wall of a blood vessel and subsequent ballooning and expansion of the vessel wall. If, for example, an aneurysm is present within an artery of the brain, and the aneurysm should burst with resulting cranial hemorrhaging, death could occur.
Surgical techniques for the treatment of cerebral aneurysms typically involve a craniotomy requiring creation of an opening in the skull of the patient through which the surgeon can insert instruments to operate directly on the patient's brain. For some surgical approaches, the brain must be retracted to expose the parent blood vessel from which the aneurysm arises. Once access to the aneurysm is gained, the surgeon places a clip across the neck of the aneurysm thereby preventing arterial blood from entering the aneurysm. Upon correct placement of the clip the aneurysm will be obliterated in a matter of minutes. Surgical techniques may be effective treatment for many aneurysms. Unfortunately, surgical techniques for treating these types of conditions include major invasive surgical procedures which often require extended periods of time under anesthesia involving high risk to the patient. Such procedures thus require that the patient be in generally good physical condition in order to be a candidate for such procedures.
Various alternative and less invasive procedures have been used to treat cerebral aneurysms without resorting to major surgery. Some such procedures involve the delivery of embolic or filling materials into an aneurysm. The delivery of such vaso-occlusion devices or materials may be used to promote hemostasis or fill an aneurysm cavity entirely. Vaso-occlusion devices may be placed within the vasculature of the human body, typically via a catheter, either to block the flow of blood through a vessel with an aneurysm through the formation of an embolus or to form such an embolus within an aneurysm stemming from the vessel. A variety of implantable, coil-type vaso-occlusion devices are known. The coils of such devices may themselves be formed into a secondary coil shape, or any of a variety of more complex secondary shapes. Vaso-occlusive coils are commonly used to treat cerebral aneurysms but suffer from several limitations including poor packing density, compaction due to hydrodynamic pressure from blood flow, poor stability in wide-necked aneurysms and complexity and difficulty in the deployment thereof as most aneurysm treatments with this approach require the deployment of multiple coils.
Another approach to treating aneurysms without the need for invasive surgery involves the placement of sleeves or stents into the vessel and across the region where the aneurysm occurs. Such devices maintain blood flow through the vessel while reducing blood pressure applied to the interior of the aneurysm. Certain types of stents are expanded to the proper size by inflating a balloon catheter, referred to as balloon expandable stents, while other stents are designed to elastically expand in a self-expanding manner. Some stents are covered typically with a sleeve of polymeric material called a graft to form a stent-graft. Stents and stent-grafts are generally delivered to a preselected position adjacent a vascular defect through a delivery catheter. In the treatment of cerebral aneurysms, covered stents or stent-grafts have seen very limited use due to the likelihood of inadvertent occlusion of small perforator vessels that may be near the vascular defect being treated.
In addition, current uncovered stents are generally not sufficient as a stand-alone treatment. In order for stents to fit through the microcatheters used in small cerebral blood vessels, their density is usually reduced such that when expanded there is only a small amount of stent structure bridging the aneurysm neck. Thus, they do not block enough flow to cause clotting of the blood in the aneurysm and are thus generally used in combination with vaso-occlusive devices, such as the coils discussed above, to achieve aneurysm occlusion.
A number of aneurysm neck bridging devices with defect spanning portions or regions have been attempted; however, none of these devices have had a significant measure of clinical success or usage. A major limitation in their adoption and clinical usefulness is the inability to position the defect spanning portion to assure coverage of the neck. Existing stent delivery systems that are neurovascular compatible (i.e. deliverable through a microcatheter and highly flexible) do not have the necessary rotational positioning capability. Another limitation of many aneurysm bridging devices described in the prior art is the poor flexibility. Cerebral blood vessels are tortuous, and a high degree of flexibility is required for effective delivery to most aneurysm locations in the brain.
What has been needed are devices and methods for delivery and use in small and tortuous blood vessels that can substantially block the flow of blood into an aneurysm, such as a cerebral aneurysm, with a decreased risk of inadvertent aneurysm rupture or blood vessel wall damage. In addition, what has been needed are methods and devices suitable for blocking blood flow in cerebral aneurysms over an extended period of time without a significant risk of deformation, compaction or dislocation.
Some embodiments of a device for treatment of a patient's vasculature include a self-expanding resilient permeable shell having a proximal end, a distal end, and a longitudinal axis. The permeable shell also includes a plurality of elongate resilient filaments with a woven structure secured relative to each other at proximal ends and distal ends thereof. The permeable shell has a radially constrained elongated state configured for delivery within a microcatheter with the thin woven filaments extending longitudinally from the proximal end to the distal end radially adjacent each other along a length of the filaments. The permeable shell also has an expanded relaxed state with a globular and longitudinally shortened configuration relative to the radially constrained state with the woven filaments forming the self-expanding resilient permeable shell in a smooth path radially expanded from the longitudinal axis between the proximal end and distal end including a plurality of openings in the shell formed between the woven filaments, the largest of said openings being configured to allow blood flow through the openings at a velocity below a thrombotic threshold velocity. The permeable shell may also include a configuration wherein at least the distal end has a reverse bend in an everted recessed configuration such that the secured distal ends of the filaments are withdrawn axially within the nominal contour of the permeable shell structure in the expanded state.
Some embodiments of a device for treatment of a patient's vasculature include a self-expanding resilient permeable shell having a proximal end, a distal end, and a longitudinal axis. The permeable shell may also include a plurality of elongate resilient filaments including large filaments and small filaments of at least two different transverse dimensions with a woven structure secured relative to each other at proximal ends and distal ends thereof. The permeable shell may also include a radially constrained elongated state configured for delivery within a microcatheter with the thin woven filaments extending longitudinally from the proximal end to the distal end radially adjacent each other along a length of the filaments. The permeable shell also has an expanded relaxed state with a globular and longitudinally shortened configuration relative to the radially constrained state with the woven filaments forming the self-expanding resilient permeable shell in a smooth path radially expanded from the longitudinal axis between the proximal end and distal end including a plurality of openings in the shell formed between the woven filaments. The permeable shell may be configured such that at least the distal end has a reverse bend in an everted recessed configuration such that the secured distal ends of the filaments are withdrawn axially within the nominal permeable shell structure in the expanded state.
Some embodiments of a device for treatment of a patient's vasculature include a self-expanding resilient permeable shell having a proximal end, a distal end, and a longitudinal axis. The permeable shell also includes a plurality of elongate resilient filaments including large filaments and small filaments of different transverse diameters with a woven structure secured relative to each other at proximal ends and distal ends thereof. The permeable shell may also include a radially constrained elongated state configured for delivery within a microcatheter with the woven filaments extending longitudinally from the proximal end to the distal end radially adjacent each other along a length of the filaments. The permeable shell also has an expanded relaxed state with a globular and longitudinally shortened configuration relative to the radially constrained state with a major transverse diameter, the woven filaments forming the self-expanding resilient permeable shell in a smooth path radially expanded from the longitudinal axis between the proximal end and distal end, and including a plurality of openings in the shell formed between the woven filaments. The permeable shell may also be configured such that at least the distal end has a reverse bend in an everted recessed configuration such that the secured distal ends of the filaments are withdrawn axially within the nominal permeable shell structure in the expanded state. In addition, the permeable shell may have properties such that the diameter of the permeable shell in an expanded state, number and diameter of large filaments and number and diameter of small filaments are configured such that the permeable shell in an expanded state has a radial stiffness of about 0.014 pounds force (lbf) to about 0.284 lbf defined by the expression (1.2×106 lbf/D4)(Nldl4+Nsds4) where D is a diameter of the permeable shell in the expanded state in inches, Nl is the number of large filaments in the permeable shell, Ns is the number of small filaments in the permeable shell, dl is the diameter of the large filaments in inches, and ds is the diameter of the small filaments in inches. The equation above contemplates two wire sizes, however, the equation is also applicable to embodiments having one wire size in which case di will be equal to ds.
Some embodiments of a device for treatment of a patient's vasculature include a self-expanding resilient permeable shell having a proximal end, a distal end, and a longitudinal axis. The permeable shell also has a plurality of elongate resilient filaments including large filaments and small filaments of different transverse diameters with a woven structure secured relative to each other at proximal ends and distal ends thereof. The permeable shell may also include a radially constrained elongated state configured for delivery within a microcatheter with the thin woven filaments extending longitudinally from the proximal end to the distal end radially adjacent each other along a length of the filaments. The permeable shell has an expanded relaxed state with a globular and longitudinally shortened configuration relative to the radially constrained state with a major transverse diameter, the woven filaments forming the self-expanding resilient permeable shell in a smooth path radially expanded from the longitudinal axis between the proximal end and distal end, and including a plurality of openings in the shell formed between the woven filaments. The permeable shell may also be configured such that at least the distal end has a reverse bend in an everted recessed configuration such that the secured distal ends of the filaments are withdrawn axially within the nominal permeable shell structure in the expanded state. The permeable shell may further have properties such that the diameter of the permeable shell in an expanded state, number of all filaments and diameter of the small filaments are configured such that the maximum opening size of a portion of the permeable shell in an expanded state that spans a vascular defect opening or vascular defect neck is less than about 0.016 inches with the maximum pore or opening size defined by the expression (1.7/NT)(πD−NT/2dw) where D is a diameter of the permeable shell in the expanded state in inches, NT is the total number of filaments in the permeable shell, and dW is the diameter of the small filaments in inches. The pore size for an opening is defined herein by the largest circular shape that may be disposed within the opening of a braided filament structure.
Some embodiments of a device for treatment of a patient's vasculature include a self-expanding resilient permeable shell having a proximal end, a distal end, and a longitudinal axis. The permeable shell further includes a plurality of elongate resilient filaments including large filaments and small filaments of different transverse diameters with a woven structure secured relative to each other at proximal ends and distal ends thereof. The permeable shell may also have a radially constrained elongated state configured for delivery within a microcatheter with the woven filaments extending longitudinally from the proximal end to the distal end radially adjacent each other along a length of the filaments. The permeable shell also includes an expanded relaxed state with a globular and longitudinally shortened configuration relative to the radially constrained state with a major transverse diameter, the woven filaments forming the self-expanding resilient permeable shell in a smooth path radially expanded from the longitudinal axis between the proximal end and distal end, and including a plurality of openings in the shell formed between the woven filaments. The permeable shell may also be configured such that at least the distal end has a reverse bend in an everted recessed configuration such that the secured distal ends of the filaments are withdrawn axially within the nominal permeable shell structure in the expanded state. The permeable shell may also have properties such that the diameter of the permeable shell in an expanded state, number and diameter of large filaments and number and diameter of small filaments are configured such that the permeable shell in a constrained state has an outer transverse diameter of less than about 0.04 inches defined by the expression 1.48((Nldl2+Nsds2))1/2 where Nl is the number of large filaments in the permeable shell, Ns is the number of small filaments in the permeable shell, dl is the diameter of the large filaments in inches, and ds is the diameter of the small filaments in inches.
Some embodiments of a method of treating a vascular defect of a patient include providing a device for treatment of a patient's vasculature comprising a self-expanding resilient permeable shell of woven filaments, the permeable shell having a proximal end, a distal end, a longitudinal axis, a radially constrained elongated state configured for delivery within a microcatheter with the woven filaments extending longitudinally from the proximal end to the distal radially adjacent each other. The permeable shell may also have an expanded relaxed state with a globular and axially shortened configuration relative to the constrained state with the woven filaments forming the self-expanding resilient permeable shell in a smooth path radially expanded from the longitudinal axis between the proximal end and distal end with the shell having a reverse bend at each end in an everted recessed configuration such that a hub at the distal end is withdrawn axially within the permeable shell structure. The permeable shell also has and a plurality of openings in the shell formed between the woven filaments. Once provided, a delivery system is advanced within a patient's body such that a distal end of the delivery system is disposed at a position adjacent or within a vascular defect to be treated. The device is then axially advanced within the delivery system while in a radially constrained state with an elongate delivery apparatus which has a distal end releasably secured to a proximal end of the device. The device is further advanced distally until the device emerges from a distal end of the delivery system. The device is further advanced from the distal end of the delivery system until it is deployed such that the woven filaments of the device radially expand from their radially constrained state, and expand into a globular configuration of the permeable shell. The deployed device then covers and acutely occludes at least a portion of an opening or neck of the vascular defect due to the pore size of the permeable shell which slows a flow of blood therethrough to a velocity below a thrombotic threshold velocity.
Some methods of occluding a vascular defect of a patient's vasculature include providing an expandable, porous vascular occlusion device formed from a woven shell of a plurality of filamentary members that are connected to each other on at least the proximal ends of the members forming a substantially closed globular structure with a shape that approximates or is slightly larger than a size and shape of the vascular defect and wherein the distal ends of the filamentary members are recessed within a nominal surface contour of the globular structure of the device. Once the device is provided, the device may be collapsed for delivery into the vascular system of the patient. The collapsed device may then be inserted through an incision in the patient's body and the device released and expanded at the vascular defect such that an outer surface contour of the device substantially fills the vascular defect. The device then substantially occludes the vascular defect acutely and becomes substantially covered with clotted blood.
Some embodiments of a method of treating a cerebral aneurysm within a cerebral vasculature of a patient include providing a microcatheter having a proximal end, a distal end, and a lumen therebetween. The device for treatment of an aneurysm within a patient's vasculature includes a self-expanding resilient permeable shell having a proximal end, a distal end, and a longitudinal axis. The device includes a plurality of elongate resilient filaments with a woven structure, wherein the plurality of filaments includes small filaments and large filaments, wherein the small filaments have a transverse dimension smaller than the transverse dimension of the large filaments, the woven structure having a radially constrained elongated state configured for delivery within a microcatheter with the thin woven filaments extending longitudinally from the proximal end to the distal end radially adjacent each other along a length of the filaments, wherein the filaments are bundled and secured to each other at a proximal end, wherein a ratio of the total cross-sectional area of small filaments to the total cross-sectional area of large filaments is between 0.56 and 1.89. The distal end of the microcatheter may be advanced to a region of interest within a cerebral artery. The device may be advanced through the lumen and out of the distal end of the microcatheter such that the permeable shell deploys within the cerebral aneurysm, wherein the permeable shell expands to an expanded state within the cerebral aneurysm, the expanded relaxed state having a longitudinally shortened configuration relative to the radially constrained state. The microcatheter may be withdrawn from the cerebral artery, wherein the permeable shell is the only implant delivered into the cerebral aneurysm through the microcatheter before the micro catheter is withdrawn.
Some embodiments of a delivery system for deployment of a device for treatment of a patient's vasculature include a microcatheter having an inner lumen extending a length thereof and a device for treatment of a patient's vasculature disposed within the inner lumen of the microcatheter. The device also includes a self-expanding resilient permeable shell of thin coupled filaments, the permeable shell having a proximal end, a distal end, a longitudinal axis, a radially constrained elongated state configured for delivery within a microcatheter with the thin woven filaments extending longitudinally from the proximal end to the distal radially adjacent each other. The permeable shell also has an expanded relaxed state with a globular and axially shortened configuration relative to the constrained state with the woven filaments forming the self-expanding resilient permeable shell in a smooth path radially expanded from the longitudinal axis between the proximal end and distal end. The permeable shell may further include a reverse bend at each end in an everted recessed configuration such that a hub at the distal end is disposed axially within the permeable shell structure. The permeable shell also has a plurality of openings formed between the woven filaments, the permeable shell further having a portion when in the expanded relaxed state that is configured to span an opening of a patient's vascular defect. The delivery system further includes an elongate delivery apparatus having a proximal end and a distal end releasably secured to a proximal hub of the device.
Some embodiments of a method of manufacturing a device for treatment of a patient's vasculature include braiding a plurality of elongate resilient filaments over a cylindrically shaped mandrel forming a braided tubular member. The elongate filaments of the braided tubular member may then be heat set in an expanded relaxed state with a globular and axially shortened configuration relative to a constrained state with the woven filaments forming the self-expanding resilient permeable shell in a smooth path radially expanded from a longitudinal axis of the device between a proximal end and a distal end of the device with the shell having a reverse bend at the distal end in an everted recessed configuration such that a hub at the distal end is withdrawn disposed within the permeable shell structure and a plurality of openings in the shell are formed between the woven filaments. The proximal ends of the filaments are then secured together, and the distal ends of the filaments are secured together.
Some embodiments of a device for treatment of a patient's vasculature include a self-expanding resilient permeable shell of thin interconnected filaments that serves as a support structure and integral defect spanning structure, the permeable shell having a first end, a second end, a longitudinal axis, a constrained cylindrical state configured for delivery within a microcatheter with the thin interconnected filaments extending from the first end to the second end. The permeable shell also has an expanded relaxed state with a globular and axially shortened configuration relative to the constrained state with filaments forming a smooth arc between the first end and second end with a reverse bend at each end in an everted recessed configuration. The permeable shell further has a defect spanning portion when in the expanded relaxed state that is configured to span an opening of a patient's vascular defect.
Some embodiments of a method of treating a vascular defect include providing a device for treatment of a patient's vasculature having a self-expanding resilient permeable shell of thin interconnected filaments that serves as a support structure and integral defect spanning structure. The permeable shell also has a first end, a second end, a longitudinal axis, a constrained cylindrical state configured for delivery within a microcatheter with the thin interconnected filaments extending from the first end to the second end. The permeable shell also has an expanded relaxed state with a globular and axially shortened configuration relative to the constrained state with filaments forming a smooth arc between the first end and second end with a reverse bend at each end in an everted recessed configuration. The permeable shell further has a defect spanning portion when in the expanded relaxed state that is configured to span an opening of a patient's vascular defect. Once provided, the delivery system may be advanced to a position adjacent a vascular defect to be treated and positioned with a distal end disposed inside the vascular defect. The device may then be deployed such that the permeable shell self-expands and the defect spanning portion of the permeable shell covers at least a portion of the defect opening or neck.
Some embodiments of a device for treatment of a patient's vasculature include a self-expanding resilient permeable shell of thin interconnected filaments that serves as a support structure and integral defect spanning structure. The permeable shell also has a first end, a second end, a longitudinal axis, a constrained cylindrical state configured for delivery within a microcatheter with the thin interconnected filaments extending from the first end to the second end. The permeable shell also has an expanded relaxed state with a globular and axially shortened configuration relative to the constrained state with filaments forming a smooth arc between the first end and second end with a reverse bend at each end in an everted recessed configuration. The permeable shell further includes a defect spanning portion when in the expanded relaxed state that is configured to span an opening of a patient's vascular defect.
Some embodiments of a method of treating a vascular defect include providing a device for treatment of a patient's vasculature having a self-expanding resilient permeable shell of thin interconnected filaments that serves as a support structure and integral defect spanning structure. The permeable shell also has a first end, a second end, a longitudinal axis, a constrained cylindrical state configured for delivery within a microcatheter with the thin interconnected filaments extending from the first end to the second end. The permeable shell further includes an expanded relaxed state with a globular and axially shortened configuration relative to the constrained state with filaments forming a smooth arc between the first end and second end with a reverse bend at each end in an everted recessed configuration. The permeable shell also has a defect spanning portion when in the expanded relaxed state that is configured to span an opening of a patient's vascular defect. Once the device has been provided, a delivery system may be advanced to a position adjacent a vascular defect to be treated. The device is then positioned inside the vascular defect and deployed such that the permeable shell self-expands and the defect spanning portion of the permeable shell covers at least a portion of the defect opening or neck.
Discussed herein are devices and methods for the treatment of vascular defects that are suitable for minimally invasive deployment within a patient's vasculature, and particularly, within the cerebral vasculature of a patient. For such embodiments to be safely and effectively delivered to a desired treatment site and effectively deployed, some device embodiments may be configured for collapse to a low profile constrained state with a transverse dimension suitable for delivery through an inner lumen of a microcatheter and deployment from a distal end thereof. Embodiments of these devices may also maintain a clinically effective configuration with sufficient mechanical integrity once deployed so as to withstand dynamic forces within a patient's vasculature over time that may otherwise result in compaction of a deployed device. It may also be desirable for some device embodiments to acutely occlude a vascular defect of a patient during the course of a procedure in order to provide more immediate feedback regarding success of the treatment to a treating physician.
Some embodiments are particularly useful for the treatment of cerebral aneurysms by reconstructing a vascular wall so as to wholly or partially isolate a vascular defect from a patient's blood flow. Some embodiments may be configured to be deployed within a vascular defect to facilitate reconstruction, bridging of a vessel wall or both in order to treat the vascular defect. For some of these embodiments, the permeable shell of the device may be configured to anchor or fix the permeable shell in a clinically beneficial position. For some embodiments, the device may be disposed in whole or in part within the vascular defect in order to anchor or fix the device with respect to the vascular structure or defect. The permeable shell may be configured to span an opening, neck or other portion of a vascular defect in order to isolate the vascular defect, or a portion thereof, from the patient's nominal vascular system in order allow the defect to heal or to otherwise minimize the risk of the defect to the patient's health.
For some or all of the embodiments of devices for treatment of a patient's vasculature discussed herein, the permeable shell may be configured to allow some initial perfusion of blood through the permeable shell. The porosity of the permeable shell may be configured to sufficiently isolate the vascular defect so as to promote healing and isolation of the defect, but allow sufficient initial flow through the permeable shell so as to reduce or otherwise minimize the mechanical force exerted on the membrane the dynamic flow of blood or other fluids within the vasculature against the device. For some embodiments of devices for treatment of a patient's vasculature, only a portion of the permeable shell that spans the opening or neck of the vascular defect, sometimes referred to as a defect spanning portion, need be permeable and/or conducive to thrombus formation in a patient's bloodstream. For such embodiments, that portion of the device that does not span an opening or neck of the vascular defect may be substantially non-permeable or completely permeable with a pore or opening configuration that is too large to effectively promote thrombus formation.
In general, it may be desirable in some cases to use a hollow, thin walled device with a permeable shell of resilient material that may be constrained to a low profile for delivery within a patient. Such a device may also be configured to expand radially outward upon removal of the constraint such that the shell of the device assumes a larger volume and fills or otherwise occludes a vascular defect within which it is deployed. The outward radial expansion of the shell may serve to engage some or all of an inner surface of the vascular defect whereby mechanical friction between an outer surface of the permeable shell of the device and the inside surface of the vascular defect effectively anchors the device within the vascular defect. Some embodiments of such a device may also be partially or wholly mechanically captured within a cavity of a vascular defect, particularly where the defect has a narrow neck portion with a larger interior volume. In order to achieve a low profile and volume for delivery and be capable of a high ratio of expansion by volume, some device embodiments include a matrix of woven or braided filaments that are coupled together by the interwoven structure so as to form a self-expanding permeable shell having a pore or opening pattern between couplings or intersections of the filaments that is substantially regularly spaced and stable, while still allowing for conformity and volumetric constraint.
As used herein, the terms woven and braided are used interchangeably to mean any form of interlacing of filaments to form a mesh structure. In the textile and other industries, these terms may have different or more specific meanings depending on the product or application such as whether an article is made in a sheet or cylindrical form. For purposes of the present disclosure, these terms are used interchangeably.
For some embodiments, three factors may be critical for a woven or braided wire occlusion device for treatment of a patient's vasculature that can achieve a desired clinical outcome in the endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysms. We have found that for effective use in some applications, it may be desirable for the implant device to have sufficient radial stiffness for stability, limited pore size for near-complete acute (intra-procedural) occlusion and a collapsed profile which is small enough to allow insertion through an inner lumen of a microcatheter. A device with a radial stiffness below a certain threshold may be unstable and may be at higher risk of embolization in some cases. Larger pores between filament intersections in a braided or woven structure may not generate thrombus and occlude a vascular defect in an acute setting and thus may not give a treating physician or health professional such clinical feedback that the flow disruption will lead to a complete and lasting occlusion of the vascular defect being treated. Delivery of a device for treatment of a patient's vasculature through a standard microcatheter may be highly desirable to allow access through the tortuous cerebral vasculature in the manner that a treating physician is accustomed.
For some embodiments, it may be desirable to use filaments having two or more different diameters or transverse dimensions to form a permeable shell in order to produce a desired configuration as discussed in more detail below. The radial stiffness of a two-filament (two different diameters) woven device may be expressed as a function of the number of filaments and their diameters, as follows:
Sradial=(1.2×106lbf/D4)(Nldl4+Nsds4)
where Sradial is the radial stiffness in pounds force (lbf),
Using this expression, the radial stiffness, Sradial may be between about 0.014 and 0.284 lbf force for some embodiments of particular clinical value.
The maximum pore size in a portion of a device that spans a neck or opening of a vascular defect desirable for some useful embodiments of a woven wire device for treatment of a patient's vasculature may be expressed as a function of the total number of all filaments, filament diameter and the device diameter. The difference between filament sizes where two or more filament diameters or transverse dimensions are used may be ignored in some cases for devices where the filament size(s) are very small compared to the device dimensions. For a two-filament device, the smallest filament diameter may be used for the calculation. Thus, the maximum pore size for such embodiments may be expressed as follows:
pmax=(1.7/NT)(πD−(NTdw/2))
Using this expression, the maximum pore size, Pmax, of a portion of a device that spans an opening of a vascular defect or neck, or any other suitable portion of a device, may be less than about 0.016 inches or about 400 microns for some embodiments. In some embodiments the maximum pore size for a defect spanning portion or any other suitable portion of a device may be less than about 0.012 inches or about 300 microns.
The collapsed profile of a two-filament (profile having two different filament diameters) woven filament device may be expressed as the function:
Pc=1.48((Nldl2+Nsds2))1/2
Using this expression, the collapsed profile Pc may be less than about 1.0 mm for some embodiments of particular clinical value.
In some embodiments of particular clinical value, the device may be constructed so as to have all three factors (Sradial, Pmax and Pc) above within the ranges discussed above; Sradial between about 0.014 lbf and 0.284 lbf, Pmax less than about 300 microns and Pc less than about 1.0 mm, simultaneously. In some such embodiments, the device may be made to include about 70 filaments to about 300 filaments. In some cases, the filaments may have an outer transverse dimension or diameter of about 0.0004 inches to about 0.002 inches.
As has been discussed, some embodiments of devices for treatment of a patient's vasculature call for sizing the device which approximates (or with some over-sizing) the vascular site dimensions to fill the vascular site. One might assume that scaling of a device to larger dimensions and using larger filaments would suffice for such larger embodiments of a device. However, for the treatment of brain aneurysms, the diameter or profile of the radially collapsed device is limited by the catheter sizes that can be effectively navigated within the small, tortuous vessels of the brain. Further, as a device is made larger with a given or fixed number of resilient filaments having a given size or thickness, the pores or openings between junctions of the filaments are correspondingly larger. In addition, for a given filament size the flexural modulus or stiffness of the filaments and thus the structure decrease with increasing device dimension. Flexural modulus may be defined as the ratio of stress to strain. Thus, a device may be considered to have a high flexural modulus or be stiff if the strain (deflection) is low under a given force. A stiff device may also be said to have low compliance.
To properly configure larger size devices for treatment of a patient's vasculature, it may be useful to model the force on a device when the device is deployed into a vascular site or defect, such as a blood vessel or aneurysm, that has a diameter or transverse dimension that is smaller than a nominal diameter or transverse dimension of the device in a relaxed unconstrained state. As discussed, it may be advisable to “over-size” the device in some cases so that there is a residual force between an outside surface of the device and an inside surface of the vascular wall. The inward radial force on a device 10 that results from over-sizing is illustrated schematically in
Deflection of Beam=5FL4/384El
Thus, as the size of the device increases and L increases, the compliance increases substantially. Accordingly, an outward radial force exerted by an outside surface of the filaments 14 of the device 10 against a constraining force when inserted into a vascular site such as blood vessel or aneurysm is lower for a given amount of device compression or over-sizing. This force may be important in some applications to assure device stability and to reduce the risk of migration of the device and potential distal embolization.
In some embodiments, a combination of small and large filament sizes may be utilized to make a device with a desired radial compliance and yet have a collapsed profile which is configured to fit through an inner lumen of commonly used microcatheters. A device fabricated with even a small number of relatively large filaments 14 can provide reduced radial compliance (or increased stiffness) compared to a device made with all small filaments. Even a relatively small number of larger filaments may provide a substantial increase in bending stiffness due to change in the moment of Inertia that results from an increase in diameter without increasing the total cross sectional area of the filaments. The moment of inertia (I) of a round wire or filament may be defined by the equation:
I=πd4/64
Since the moment of inertia is a function of filament diameter to the fourth power, a small change in the diameter greatly increases the moment of inertia. Thus, a small change in filament size can have substantial impact on the deflection at a given load and thus the compliance of the device.
Thus, the stiffness can be increased by a significant amount without a large increase in the cross sectional area of a collapsed profile of the device 10. This may be particularly important as device embodiments are made larger to treat large aneurysms. While large cerebral aneurysms may be relatively rare, they present an important therapeutic challenge as some embolic devices currently available to physicians have relatively poor results compared to smaller aneurysms.
As such, some embodiments of devices for treatment of a patient's vasculature may be formed using a combination of filaments 14 with a number of different diameters such as 2, 3, 4, 5 or more different diameters or transverse dimensions. In device embodiments where filaments with two different diameters are used, some larger filament embodiments may have a transverse dimension of about 0.001 inches to about 0.004 inches and some small filament embodiments may have a transverse dimension or diameter of about 0.0004 inches and about 0.0015 inches, more specifically, about 0.0004 inches to about 0.001 inches. The ratio of the number of large filaments to the number of small filaments may be between about 2 and 12 and may also be between about 4 and 8. In some embodiments, the difference in diameter or transverse dimension between the larger and smaller filaments may be less than about 0.004 inches, more specifically, less than about 0.0035 inches, and even more specifically, less than about 0.002 inches.
As discussed above, device embodiments 10 for treatment of a patient's vasculature may include a plurality of wires, fibers, threads, tubes or other filamentary elements that form a structure that serves as a permeable shell. For some embodiments, a globular shape may be formed from such filaments by connecting or securing the ends of a tubular braided structure. For such embodiments, the density of a braided or woven structure may inherently increase at or near the ends where the wires or filaments 14 are brought together and decrease at or near a middle portion 30 disposed between a proximal end 32 and distal end 34 of the permeable shell 40. For some embodiments, an end or any other suitable portion of a permeable shell 40 may be positioned in an opening or neck of a vascular defect such as an aneurysm for treatment. As such, a braided or woven filamentary device with a permeable shell may not require the addition of a separate defect spanning structure having properties different from that of a nominal portion of the permeable shell to achieve hemostasis and occlusion of the vascular defect. Such a filamentary device may be fabricated by braiding, weaving or other suitable filament fabrication techniques. Such device embodiments may be shape set into a variety of three dimensional shapes such as discussed herein.
Referring to
As shown in
As such, once the device 10 is deployed, any blood flowing through the permeable shell may be slowed to a velocity below the thrombotic threshold velocity and thrombus will begin to form on and around the openings in the permeable shell 40. Ultimately, this process may be configured to produce acute occlusion of the vascular defect within which the device 10 is deployed. For some embodiments, at least the distal end of the permeable shell 40 may have a reverse bend in an everted configuration such that the secured distal ends 62 of the filaments 14 are withdrawn axially within the nominal permeable shell structure or contour in the expanded state. For some embodiments, the proximal end of the permeable shell further includes a reverse bend in an everted configuration such that the secured proximal ends 60 of the filaments 14 are withdrawn axially within the nominal permeable shell structure 40 in the expanded state. As used herein, the term everted may include a structure that is everted, partially everted and/or recessed with a reverse bend as shown in the device embodiment of
The elongate resilient filaments 14 of the permeable shell 40 may be secured relative to each other at proximal ends 60 and distal ends 62 thereof by one or more methods including welding, soldering, adhesive bonding, epoxy bonding or the like. In addition to the ends of the filaments being secured together, a distal hub 66 may also be secured to the distal ends 62 of the thin filaments 14 of the permeable shell 40 and a proximal hub 68 secured to the proximal ends 60 of the thin filaments 14 of the permeable shell 40. The proximal hub 68 may include a cylindrical member that extends proximally beyond the proximal ends 60 of the thin filaments so as to form a cavity 70 within a proximal portion of the proximal hub 68. The proximal cavity 70 may be used for holding adhesives such as epoxy, solder or any other suitable bonding agent for securing an elongate detachment tether 72 that may in turn be detachably secured to a delivery apparatus such as is shown in
For some embodiments, the elongate resilient filaments 14 of the permeable shell 40 may have a transverse cross section that is substantially round in shape and be made from a superelastic material that may also be a shape memory metal. The shape memory metal of the filaments of the permeable shell 40 may be heat set in the globular configuration of the relaxed expanded state as shown in
The device 10 may have an everted filamentary structure with a permeable shell 40 having a proximal end 32 and a distal end 34 in an expanded relaxed state. The permeable shell 40 has a substantially enclosed configuration for the embodiments shown. Some or all of the permeable shell 40 of the device 10 may be configured to substantially block or impede fluid flow or pressure into a vascular defect or otherwise isolate the vascular defect over some period of time after the device is deployed in an expanded state. The permeable shell 40 and device 10 generally also has a low profile, radially constrained state, as shown in
Proximal ends 60 of at least some of the filaments 14 of the permeable shell 40 may be secured to the proximal hub 68 and distal ends 62 of at least some of the filaments 14 of the permeable shell 40 are secured to the distal hub 66, with the proximal hub 68 and distal hub 66 being disposed substantially concentric to the longitudinal axis 46 as shown in
Some device embodiments 10 having a braided or woven filamentary structure may be formed using about 10 filaments to about 300 filaments 14, more specifically, about 10 filaments to about 100 filaments 14, and even more specifically, about 60 filaments to about 80 filaments 14. Some embodiments of a permeable shell 40 may include about 70 filaments to about 300 filaments extending from the proximal end 32 to the distal end 34, more specifically, about 100 filaments to about 200 filaments extending from the proximal end 32 to the distal end 34. For some embodiments, the filaments 14 may have a transverse dimension or diameter of about 0.0008 inches to about 0.004 inches. The elongate resilient filaments 14 in some cases may have an outer transverse dimension or diameter of about 0.0005 inch to about 0.005 inch, more specifically, about 0.001 inch to about 0.003 inch, and in some cases about 0.0004 inches to about 0.002 inches. For some device embodiments 10 that include filaments 14 of different sizes, the large filaments 48 of the permeable shell 40 may have a transverse dimension or diameter that is about 0.001 inches to about 0.004 inches and the small filaments 50 may have a transverse dimension or diameter of about 0.0004 inches to about 0.0015 inches, more specifically, about 0.0004 inches to about 0.001 inches. In addition, a difference in transverse dimension or diameter between the small filaments 50 and the large filaments 48 may be less than about 0.004 inches, more specifically, less than about 0.0035 inches, and even more specifically, less than about 0.002 inches. For embodiments of permeable shells 40 that include filaments 14 of different sizes, the number of small filaments 50 of the permeable shell 40 relative to the number of large filaments 48 of the permeable shell 40 may be about 2 to 1 to about 15 to 1, more specifically, about 2 to 1 to about 12 to 1, and even more specifically, about 4 to 1 to about 8 to 1.
The expanded relaxed state of the permeable shell 40, as shown in
For some embodiments, the permeable shell 40 may have a first transverse dimension in a collapsed radially constrained state of about 0.2 mm to about 2 mm and a second transverse dimension in a relaxed expanded state of about 4 mm to about 30 mm. For some embodiments, the second transverse dimension of the permeable shell 40 in an expanded state may be about 2 times to about 150 times the first transverse dimension, more specifically, about 10 times to about 25 times the first or constrained transverse dimension. A longitudinal spacing between the proximal end 32 and distal end 34 of the permeable shell 40 in the relaxed expanded state may be about 25% percent to about 75% percent of the spacing between the proximal end 32 and distal end 34 in the constrained cylindrical state. For some embodiments, a major transverse dimension of the permeable shell 40 in a relaxed expanded state may be about 4 mm to about 30 mm, more specifically, about 9 mm to about 15 mm, and even more specifically, about 4 mm to about 8 mm.
An arced portion of the filaments 14 of the permeable shell 40 may have a sinusoidal-like shape with a first or outer radius 88 and a second or inner radius 90 near the ends of the permeable shell 40 as shown in
The first radius 88 and second radius 90 of the permeable shell 40 may be between about 0.12 mm to about 3 mm for some embodiments. For some embodiments, the distance between the proximal end 32 and distal end 34 may be more than about 60% of the overall length of the expanded permeable shell 40. Thus, the largest longitudinal distance between the inner surfaces may be about 60% to about 90% of the longitudinal length of the outer surfaces or the overall length of device 10. A gap between the hubs 66 and 68 at the proximal end 32 and distal end 34 may allow for the distal hub 66 to flex downward toward the proximal hub 68 when the device 10 meets resistance at the distal end and thus provides longitudinal conformance. The filaments 14 may be shaped such that there are no portions that are without curvature over a distance of more than about 2 mm. Thus, for some embodiments, each filament 14 may have a substantially continuous curvature. This substantially continuous curvature may provide smooth deployment and may reduce the risk of vessel perforation. The distal end 34 may be retracted or everted to a greater extent than the proximal end 32 such that the distal end portion of the permeable shell 40 may be more radially conformal than the proximal end portion. Conformability of a distal end portion may provide better device conformance to irregular shaped aneurysms or other vascular defects. A convex surface of the device may flex inward forming a concave surface to conform to curvature of a vascular site.
The pore size defined by the largest circular shapes 100 that may be disposed within openings 64 of the braided structure of the permeable shell 40 without displacing or distorting the filaments 14 surrounding the opening 64 may range in size from about 0.005 inches to about 0.01 inches, more specifically, about 0.006 inches to about 0.009 inches, even more specifically, about 0.007 inches to about 0.008 inches for some embodiments. In addition, at least some of the openings 64 formed between adjacent filaments 14 of the permeable shell 40 of the device 10 may be configured to allow blood flow through the openings 64 only at a velocity below a thrombotic threshold velocity. For some embodiments, the largest openings 64 in the permeable shell structure 40 may be configured to allow blood flow through the openings 64 only at a velocity below a thrombotic threshold velocity. As discussed above, the pore size may be less than about 0.016 inches, more specifically, less than about 0.012 inches for some embodiments. For some embodiments, the openings 64 formed between adjacent filaments 14 may be about 0.005 inches to about 0.04 inches.
Referring to
A heater coil 124 electrically coupled to a first conductor 126 and a second conductor 128 is disposed over a distal most portion of the tether 72. The heater coil 124 may also be covered with a length of polymer tubing 130 disposed over the heater coil 124 distal of the heat shrink tubing 122 that serves to act as a heat shield and minimizes the leakage of heat from the heater coil 124 into the environment, such as the patient's blood stream, around the delivery apparatus 110. Once the heat shrink tubing 122 and insulating polymer tubing 130 have been secured to the distal section 118 of the apparatus 110, the proximal portion of the tether 72 disposed proximal of the heat shrink tubing 122 may be trimmed as shown in FIG. 13. An over coil 132 that extends from a distal end 134 of the delivery apparatus 110 to a proximal section 136 of the apparatus 110 may then be disposed over the heater coil 124, core wire 114, tether 72, first conductor 126 and second conductor 128 to hold these elements together, produce a low friction outer surface and maintain a desired flexibility of the delivery apparatus 110. The proximal section 136 of the apparatus 110 includes the proximal terminus of the over coil 132 which is disposed distal of a first contact 138 and second contact 140 which are circumferentially disposed about the proximal section 136 of the core wire 114, insulated therefrom, and electrically coupled to the first conductor 126 and second conductor 128, respectively as shown in
The heater coil 124 may be configured to receive electric current supplied through the first conductor 126 and second conductor 128 from an electrical energy source 142 coupled to the first contact 138 and second contact 140 at the proximal section 136 of the apparatus 110. The electrical current passed through the heater coil 124 heats the heater coil to a temperature above the melting point of the tether material 72 so as to melt the tether 72 and sever it upon deployment of the device 10.
Embodiments of the delivery apparatus 110 may generally have a length greater than the overall length of a microcatheter 61 to be used for the delivery system 112. This relationship allows the delivery apparatus 110 to extend, along with the device 10 secured to the distal end thereof, from the distal port of the inner lumen 120 of the microcatheter 61 while having sufficient length extending from a proximal end 150 of the microcatheter 61, shown in
Other delivery and positioning system embodiments may provide for the ability to rotate a device for treatment of a patient's vasculature in-vivo without translating torque along the entire length of the delivery apparatus. Some embodiments for delivery and positioning of devices 10 are described in co-owned International PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2008/065694 incorporated above. The delivery and positioning apparatus may include a distal rotating member that allows rotational positioning of the device. The delivery and positioning apparatus may include a distal rotating member which rotates an implant in-vivo without the transmission of torque along the entire length of the apparatus. Optionally, delivery system may also rotate the implant without the transmission of torque in the intermediate portion between the proximal end and the distal rotatable end. The delivery and positioning apparatus may be releasably secured to any suitable portion of the device for treatment of a patient's vasculature.
Device embodiments discussed herein may be releasable from any suitable flexible, elongate delivery apparatus or actuator such as a guidewire or guidewire-like structure. The release of device embodiments from such a delivery apparatus may be activated by a thermal mechanism, as discussed above, electrolytic mechanism, hydraulic mechanism, shape memory material mechanism, or any other mechanism known in the art of endovascular implant deployment.
Embodiments for deployment and release of therapeutic devices, such as deployment of embolic devices or stents within the vasculature of a patient, may include connecting such a device via a releasable connection to a distal portion of a pusher or other delivery apparatus member. The therapeutic device 10 may be detachably mounted to the distal portion of the apparatus by a filamentary tether 72, string, thread, wire, suture, fiber, or the like, which may be referred to above as the tether. The tether 72 may be in the form of a monofilament, rod, ribbon, hollow tube, or the like. Some embodiments of the tether may have a diameter or maximum thickness of between about 0.05 mm and 0.2 mm. The tether 72 may be configured to be able to withstand a maximum tensile load of between about 0.5 kg and 5 kg. For some embodiments, due to the mass of the device 10 being deployed which may be substantially greater than some embolic devices, some known detachment devices may lack sufficient tensile strength to be used for some embodiments discussed herein. As such, it may be desirable to use small very high strength fibers for some tether embodiments having a “load at break” greater than about 15 Newtons. For some embodiments, a tether made from a material known as Dyneema Purity available from Royal DSM, Heerlen, Netherlands may be used.
The tether 72 may be severed by the input of energy such as electric current to a heating element causing release of the therapeutic device. For some embodiments, the heating element may be a coil of wire with high electrical resistivity such as a platinum-tungsten alloy. The tether member may pass through or be positioned adjacent the heater element. The heater may be contained substantially within the distal portion of the delivery apparatus to provide thermal insulation to reduce the potential for thermal damage to the surrounding tissues during detachment. In another embodiment, current may pass through the tether which also acts as a heating element.
Many materials may be used to make tether embodiments 72 including polymers, metals and composites thereof. One class of materials that may be useful for tethers includes polymers such as polyolefin, polyolefin elastomer such as polyethylene, polyester (PET), polyamide (Nylon), polyurethane, polypropylene, block copolymer such as PEBAX or Hytrel, and ethylene vinyl alcohol (EVA); or rubbery materials such as silicone, latex, and Kraton. In some cases, the polymer may also be cross-linked with radiation to manipulate its tensile strength and melt temperature. Another class of materials that may be used for tether embodiment may include metals such as nickel titanium alloy (Nitinol), gold, platinum, tantalum and steel. Other materials that may be useful for tether construction includes wholly aromatic polyester polymers which are liquid crystal polymers (LCP) that may provide high performance properties and are highly inert. A commercially available LCP polymer is Vectran, which is produced by Kuraray Co. (Tokyo, Japan). The selection of the material may depend on the melting or softening temperature, the power used for detachment, and the body treatment site. The tether may be joined to the implant and/or the pusher by crimping, welding, knot tying, soldering, adhesive bonding, or other means known in the art.
It should be noted also that many variations of filament and proximal hub construction such as is detailed above with regard to
For some embodiments, the permeable shell 40 or portions thereof may be porous and may be highly permeable to liquids. In contrast to most vascular prosthesis fabrics or grafts which typically have a water permeability below 2,000 ml/min/cm2 when measured at a pressure of 120 mmHg, the permeable shell 40 of some embodiments discussed herein may have a water permeability greater than about 2,000 ml/min/cm2, in some cases greater than about 2,500 ml/min/cm2. For some embodiments, water permeability of the permeable shell 40 or portions thereof may be between about 2,000 and 10,000 ml/min/cm2, more specifically, about 2,000 ml/min/cm2 to about 15,000 ml/min/cm2, when measured at a pressure of 120 mmHg.
Device embodiments and components thereof may include metals, polymers, biologic materials and composites thereof. Suitable metals include zirconium-based alloys, cobalt-chrome alloys, nickel-titanium alloys, platinum, tantalum, stainless steel, titanium, gold, and tungsten. Potentially suitable polymers include but are not limited to acrylics, silk, silicones, polyvinyl alcohol, polypropylene, polyvinyl alcohol, polyesters (e.g. polyethylene terephthalate or PET), PolyEtherEther Ketone (PEEK), polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), polycarbonate urethane (PCU) and polyurethane (PU). Device embodiments may include a material that degrades or is absorbed or eroded by the body. A bioresorbable (e.g., breaks down and is absorbed by a cell, tissue, or other mechanism within the body) or bioabsorbable (similar to bioresorbable) material may be used. Alternatively, a bioerodable (e.g., erodes or degrades over time by contact with surrounding tissue fluids, through cellular activity or other physiological degradation mechanisms), biodegradable (e.g., degrades over time by enzymatic or hydrolytic action, or other mechanism in the body), or dissolvable material may be employed. Each of these terms is interpreted to be interchangeable. bioabsorbable polymer. Potentially suitable bioabsorbable materials include polylactic acid (PLA), poly(alpha-hydroxy acid) such as poly-L-lactide (PLLA), poly-D-lactide (PDLA), polyglycolide (PGA), polydioxanone, polycaprolactone, polygluconate, polylactic acid-polyethylene oxide copolymers, modified cellulose, collagen, poly(hydroxybutyrate), polyanhydride, polyphosphoester, poly(amino acids), or related copolymer materials. An absorbable composite fiber may be made by combining a reinforcement fiber made from a copolymer of about 18% glycolic acid and about 82% lactic acid with a matrix material consisting of a blend of the above copolymer with about 20% polycaprolactone (PCL).
In any of the suitable device embodiments 10 discussed herein, the permeable shell structure 40 may include one or more fixation elements or surfaces to facilitate fixation of the device within a blood vessel or other vascular site. The fixation elements may comprise hooks, barbs, protrusions, pores, microfeatures, texturing, bioadhesives or combinations thereof. Embodiments of the support structure may be fabricated from a tube of metal where portions are removed. The removal of material may be done by laser, electrical discharge machining (EDM), photochemical etching and traditional machining techniques. In any of the described embodiments, the support structure may be constructed with a plurality of wires, cut or etched from a sheet of a material, cut or etched from a tube or a combination thereof as in the art of vascular stent fabrication.
Permeable shell embodiments 40 may be formed at least in part of wire, ribbon, or other filamentary elements 14. These filamentary elements 14 may have circular, elliptical, ovoid, square, rectangular, or triangular cross-sections. Permeable shell embodiments 40 may also be formed using conventional machining, laser cutting, electrical discharge machining (EDM) or photochemical machining (PCM). If made of a metal, it may be formed from either metallic tubes or sheet material.
Device embodiments 10 discussed herein may be delivered and deployed from a delivery and positioning system 112 that includes a microcatheter 61, such as the type of microcatheter 61 that is known in the art of neurovascular navigation and therapy. Device embodiments for treatment of a patient's vasculature 10 may be elastically collapsed and restrained by a tube or other radial restraint, such as an inner lumen 120 of a microcatheter 61, for delivery and deployment. The microcatheter 61 may generally be inserted through a small incision 152 accessing a peripheral blood vessel such as the femoral artery or brachial artery. The microcatheter 61 may be delivered or otherwise navigated to a desired treatment site 154 from a position outside the patient's body 156 over a guidewire 159 under fluoroscopy or by other suitable guiding methods. The guidewire 159 may be removed during such a procedure to allow insertion of the device 10 secured to a delivery apparatus 110 of the delivery system 112 through the inner lumen 120 of a microcatheter 61 in some cases.
Access to a variety of blood vessels of a patient may be established, including arteries such as the femoral artery 166, radial artery 164, and the like in order to achieve percutaneous access to a vascular defect 160. In general, the patient 158 may be prepared for surgery and the access artery is exposed via a small surgical incision 152 and access to the lumen is gained using the Seldinger technique where an introducing needle is used to place a wire over which a dilator or series of dilators dilates a vessel allowing an introducer sheath 162 to be inserted into the vessel. This would allow the device to be used percutaneously. With an introducer sheath 162 in place, a guiding catheter 168 is then used to provide a safe passageway from the entry site to a region near the target site 154 to be treated. For example, in treating a site in the human brain, a guiding catheter 168 would be chosen which would extend from the entry site 152 at the femoral artery up through the large arteries extending around the heart through the aortic arch, and downstream through one of the arteries extending from the upper side of the aorta such as the carotid artery 170. Typically, a guidewire 159 and neurovascular microcatheter 61 are then placed through the guiding catheter 168 and advanced through the patient's vasculature, until a distal end 151 of the microcatheter 61 is disposed adjacent or within the target vascular defect 160, such as an aneurysm. Exemplary guidewires 159 for neurovascular use include the Synchro2® made by Boston Scientific and the Glidewire Gold Neuro® made by MicroVention Terumo. Typical guidewire sizes may include 0.014 inches and 0.018 inches. Once the distal end 151 of the catheter 61 is positioned at the site, often by locating its distal end through the use of radiopaque marker material and fluoroscopy, the catheter is cleared. For example, if a guidewire 159 has been used to position the microcatheter 61, it is withdrawn from the catheter 61 and then the implant delivery apparatus 110 is advanced through the microcatheter 61.
Delivery and deployment of device embodiments 10 discussed herein may be carried out by first compressing the device 10 to a radially constrained and longitudinally flexible state as shown in
Once disposed within the vascular defect 160, the device 10 may then allowed to assume an expanded relaxed or partially relaxed state with the permeable shell 40 of the device spanning or partially spanning a portion of the vascular defect 160 or the entire vascular defect 160. The device 10 may also be activated by the application of an energy source to assume an expanded deployed configuration once ejected from the distal section of the microcatheter 61 for some embodiments. Once the device 10 is deployed at a desired treatment site 154, the microcatheter 61 may then be withdrawn.
Some embodiments of devices for the treatment of a patient's vasculature 10 discussed herein may be directed to the treatment of specific types of defects of a patient's vasculature. For example, referring to
Prior to delivery and deployment of a device for treatment of a patient's vasculature 10, it may be desirable for the treating physician to choose an appropriately sized device 10 to optimize the treatment results. Some embodiments of treatment may include estimating a volume of a vascular site or defect 160 to be treated and selecting a device 10 with a volume that is substantially the same volume or slightly over-sized relative to the volume of the vascular site or defect 160. The volume of the vascular defect 160 to be occluded may be determined using three-dimensional angiography or other similar imaging techniques along with software which calculates the volume of a selected region. The amount of over-sizing may be between about 2% and 15% of the measured volume. In some embodiments, such as a very irregular shaped aneurysm, it may be desirable to under-size the volume of the device 10. Small lobes or “daughter aneurysms” may be excluded from the volume, defining a truncated volume which may be only partially filled by the device without affecting the outcome. A device 10 deployed within such an irregularly shaped aneurysm 160 is shown in
In particular, for some treatment embodiments, it may be desirable to choose a device 10 that is properly oversized in a transverse dimension so as to achieve a desired conformance, radial force and fit after deployment of the device 10.
In
Once a properly sized device 10 has been selected, the delivery and deployment process may then proceed. It should also be noted also that the properties of the device embodiments 10 and delivery system embodiments 112 discussed herein generally allow for retraction of a device 10 after initial deployment into a defect 160, but before detachment of the device 10. Therefore, it may also be possible and desirable to withdraw or retrieve an initially deployed device 10 after the fit within the defect 160 has been evaluated in favor of a differently sized device 10. An example of a terminal aneurysm 160 is shown in
Detachment of the device 10 from the delivery apparatus 110 may be controlled by a control switch 188 disposed at a proximal end of the delivery system 112, which may also be coupled to an energy source 142, which severs the tether 72 that secures the proximal hub 68 of the device 10 to the delivery apparatus 110. While disposed within the microcatheter 61 or other suitable delivery system 112, as shown in
The device 10 may be inserted through the microcatheter 61 such that the catheter lumen 120 restrains radial expansion of the device 10 during delivery. Once the distal tip or deployment port of the delivery system 112 is positioned in a desirable location adjacent or within a vascular defect 160, the device 10 may be deployed out the distal end of the catheter 61 thus allowing the device to begin to radially expand as shown in
Upon full deployment, radial expansion of the device 10 may serve to secure the device 10 within the vascular defect 160 and also deploy the permeable shell 40 across at least a portion of an opening 190 (e.g. aneurysm neck) so as to at least partially isolate the vascular defect 160 from flow, pressure or both of the patient's vasculature adjacent the vascular defect 160 as shown in
One exemplary case study that has been conducted includes a procedure performed on a female canine where an aneurysm was surgically created in the subject canine. The target aneurysm prior to treatment had a maximum transverse dimension of about 8 mm, a length of about 10 mm and a neck measurement of about 5.6 mm. The device 10 deployed included a permeable shell 40 formed of 144 resilient filaments having a transverse diameter of about 0.0015 inches braided into a globular structure having a transverse dimension of about 10 mm and a longitudinal length of about 7 mm in a relaxed expanded state. The maximum size 100 of the pores 64 of the expanded deployed permeable shell 40 was about 0.013 inches. The device was delivered to the target aneurysm using a 5 Fr. Guider Softip XF guide catheter made by Boston Scientific. The maximum size 100 of the pores 64 of the portion of the expanded deployed permeable shell 40 that spanned the neck of the aneurysm again was about 0.013 inches. Five minutes after detachment from the delivery system, the device 10 had produced acute occlusion of the aneurysm.
Another exemplary case study conducted involved treatment of a surgically created aneurysm in a New Zealand White Rabbit. The target aneurysm prior to treatment had a maximum transverse dimension of about 3.6 mm, length of about 5.8 mm and a neck measurement of about 3.4 mm. The device 10 deployed included a permeable shell formed of 144 resilient filaments having a transverse diameter of about 0.001 inches braided into a globular structure having a transverse dimension of about 4 mm and a length of about 5 mm in a relaxed expanded state. The pore size 100 of the portion of the braided mesh of the expanded deployed permeable shell 40 that was configured to span the neck of the vascular defect was about 0.005 inches. The device was delivered to the surgically created aneurysm with a 5 Fr. Envoy STR guide catheter manufactured by Cordis Neurovascular. A Renegade Hi-Flo microcatheter manufactured by Boston Scientific having an inner lumen diameter of about 0.027 inches was then inserted through the guide catheter and served as a conduit for delivery of the device 10 secured to a distal end of a delivery apparatus. Once the device 10 was deployed within the vascular defect 160, the vascular defect 160 achieved at least partial occlusion at 5 minutes from implantation. However, due to the sensitivity of the subject animal to angiographic injection and measurement, no further data was taken during the procedure. Complete occlusion was observed for the device when examined at 3 weeks from the procedure.
For some embodiments, as discussed above, the device 10 may be manipulated by the user to position the device 10 within the vascular site or defect 160 during or after deployment but prior to detachment. For some embodiments, the device 10 may be rotated in order to achieve a desired position of the device 10 and, more specifically, a desired position of the permeable shell 40, prior to or during deployment of the device 10. For some embodiments, the device 10 may be rotated about a longitudinal axis of the delivery system 112 with or without the transmission or manifestation of torque being exhibited along a middle portion of a delivery catheter being used for the delivery. It may be desirable in some circumstances to determine whether acute occlusion of the vascular defect 160 has occurred prior to detachment of the device 10 from the delivery apparatus 110 of the delivery system 112. These delivery and deployment methods may be used for deployment within berry aneurysms, terminal aneurysms, or any other suitable vascular defect embodiments 160. Some method embodiments include deploying the device 10 at a confluence of three vessels of the patient's vasculature that form a bifurcation such that the permeable shell 40 of the device 10 substantially covers the neck of a terminal aneurysm. Once the physician is satisfied with the deployment, size and position of the device 10, the device 10 may then be detached by actuation of the control switch 188 by the methods described above and shown in
Markers, such as radiopaque markers, on the device 10 or delivery system 112 may be used in conjunction with external imaging equipment (e.g., x-ray) to facilitate positioning of the device or delivery system during deployment. Once the device is properly positioned, the device 10 may be detached by the user. For some embodiments, the detachment of the device 10 from the delivery apparatus 110 of the delivery system 112 may be affected by the delivery of energy (e.g. heat, radiofrequency, ultrasound, vibrational, or laser) to a junction or release mechanism between the device 10 and the delivery apparatus 110. Once the device 10 has been detached, the delivery system 112 may be withdrawn from the patient's vasculature or patient's body 158. For some embodiments, a stent 173 may be place within the parent vessel substantially crossing the aneurysm neck 190 after delivery of the device 10 as shown in
For some embodiments, a biologically active agent or a passive therapeutic agent may be released from a responsive material component of the device 10. The agent release may be affected by one or more of the body's environmental parameters or energy may be delivered (from an internal or external source) to the device 10. Hemostasis may occur within the vascular defect 160 as a result of the isolation of the vascular defect 160, ultimately leading to clotting and substantial occlusion of the vascular defect 160 by a combination of thrombotic material and the device 10. For some embodiments, thrombosis within the vascular defect 160 may be facilitated by agents released from the device 10 and/or drugs or other therapeutic agents delivered to the patient.
For some embodiments, once the device 10 has been deployed, the attachment of platelets to the permeable shell 40 may be inhibited and the formation of clot within an interior space of the vascular defect 160, device, or both promoted or otherwise facilitated with a suitable choice of thrombogenic coatings, anti-thrombogenic coatings or any other suitable coatings (not shown) which may be disposed on any portion of the device 10 for some embodiments, including an outer surface of the filaments 14 or the hubs 66 and 68. Such a coating or coatings may be applied to any suitable portion of the permeable shell 40. Energy forms may also be applied through the delivery apparatus 110 and/or a separate catheter to facilitate fixation and/or healing of the device 10 adjacent the vascular defect 160 for some embodiments. One or more embolic devices or embolic material 176 may also optionally be delivered into the vascular defect 160 adjacent permeable shell portion that spans the neck or opening 190 of the vascular defect 160 after the device 10 has been deployed. For some embodiments, a stent or stent-like support device 173 may be implanted or deployed in a parent vessel adjacent the defect 160 such that it spans across the vascular defect 160 prior to or after deployment of the vascular defect treatment device 10.
In any of the above embodiments, the device 10 may have sufficient radial compliance so as to be readily retrievable or retractable into a typical microcatheter 61. The proximal portion of the device 10, or the device as a whole for some embodiments, may be engineered or modified by the use of reduced diameter filaments, tapered filaments, or filaments oriented for radial flexure so that the device 10 is retractable into a tube that has an internal diameter that is less than about 0.7 mm, using a retraction force less than about 2.7 Newtons (0.6 lbf) force. The force for retrieving the device 10 into a microcatheter 61 may be between about 0.8 Newtons (0.18 lbf) and about 2.25 Newtons (0.5 lbf).
Engagement of the permeable shell 40 with tissue of an inner surface of a vascular defect 160, when in an expanded relaxed state, may be achieved by the exertion of an outward radial force against tissue of the inside surface of the cavity of the patient's vascular defect 160 as shown in
Some implanted device embodiments 10 have the ends of the filaments 14 of the permeable shell 40 disposed even with or just within a plane formed by the apices of the filaments disposed adjacent to the ends. Some embodiments of the device 10 may also include a sealing member disposed within or about a perimeter zone 198 or other suitable portion of the permeable shell 40 and be configured to facilitate the disruption of flow, a fibrotic tissue response, or physically form a seal between the permeable shell 40 and a surface of the patient's vasculature. The sealing member may comprise coatings, fibers or surface treatments as described herein. The sealing member may be in a part or all of an area of the periphery of the device adjacent where the device contacts the wall of the aneurysm near the aneurysm neck (sealing zone 198) as shown in
Any embodiment of devices for treatment of a patient's vasculature 10, delivery system 112 for such devices 10 or both discussed herein may be adapted to deliver energy to the device for treatment of a patient's vasculature or to tissue surrounding the device 10 at the implant site for the purpose of facilitating fixation of a device 10, healing of tissue adjacent the device or both. In some embodiments, energy may be delivered through a delivery system 112 to the device 10 for treatment of a patient's vasculature such that the device 10 is heated. In some embodiments, energy may be delivered via a separate elongate instrument (e.g. catheter, not shown) to the device 10 for treatment of a patient's vasculature and/or surrounding tissue at the site of the implant 154. Examples of energy embodiments that may be delivered include but are not limited to light energy, thermal or vibration energy, electromagnetic energy, radio frequency energy and ultrasonic energy. For some embodiments, energy delivered to the device 10 may trigger the release of chemical or biologic agents to promote fixation of a device for treatment of a patient's vasculature 10 to a patient's tissue, healing of tissue disposed adjacent such a device 10 or both.
The permeable shell 40 of some device embodiments 10 may also be configured to react to the delivery of energy to effect a change in the mechanical or structural characteristics, deliver drugs or other bioactive agents or transfer heat to the surrounding tissue. For example, some device embodiments 10 may be made softer or more rigid from the use of materials that change properties when exposed to electromagnetic energy (e.g., heat, light, or radio frequency energy). In some cases, the permeable shell 40 may include a polymer that reacts in response to physiologic fluids by expanding. An exemplary material is described by Cox in U.S. Patent Application No. 2004/0186562, filed Jan. 22, 2004, titled “Aneurysm Treatment Device and Method of Use”, which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Device embodiments 10 and components thereof discussed herein may take on a large variety of configurations to achieve specific or generally desirable clinical results. In some device embodiments 10, the start of the braided structure of the permeable shell 40 may be delayed from the proximal hub 68 so that the filaments 1 emanate from the proximal hub 68 in a spoke-like radial fashion as shown in the proximal end view of a device in
The woven structure may include a portion where the weave or braid of the filaments 14 is interrupted as shown in a flat pattern analog pattern in
In some embodiments, filamentary or fibrous members that are substantially non-structural may be attached or interwoven into the structural filaments of a portion of the permeable shell to increase a resistance to the flow of blood through the permeable shell structure 40. In some embodiments, a plurality of fibers 200 may be attached on the inner surface of the permeable shell 40 near the proximal hub 68 as shown in
In some cases, device embodiments for treatment of a patient's vasculature 10 may generally be fabricated by braiding a substantially tubular braided structure with filamentary elements 14, forming the braided tubular structure into a desired shape, and heat setting the braided formed filaments into the desired shape. Once so formed, the ends of the elongate resilient filaments 14 may then be secured together relative to each other by any of the methods discussed above and proximal and distal hubs 66 and 68 added.
Such a braiding process may be carried out by automated machine fabrication or may also be performed by hand. An embodiment of a process for braiding a tubular braided structure by a manual process is shown in
The central ball mandrel 212 may be configured to have any desired shape so as to produce a shape set tubular braided member 208 that forms a permeable shell 40 having a desired shape and size such as the globular configuration of the device 10 of
In order to hold the braided tubular member 208 into a desired shape, including the recessed ends thereof, the end forming mandrels 214 are configured to be pushed against and into recessed ends 238 of the internal tube mandrel 232 such that the inside surface of the braided tubular member 208 is held against the outer contour of the internal tube mandrel 232 and fixed in place at the ends of the tube mandrel 232. Between the ends of the tube mandrel 232, the braided tubular member 208 radially expands outwardly until it touches and is radially constrained by an inside surface of an external tube mandrel 234. The combination of axial restraint and securement of the braided tubular member 208 at the ends of the internal tube mandrel 232 in conjunction with the inward radial restraint on an outside surface of the braided tubular member 208 disposed between the proximal and distal ends thereof, may be configured to produce a desired globular configuration suitable for the permeable shell 40 of the device 10.
Once again, this entire fixture 230 with the inside surface of the ends of the braided tubular structure 208 held against the outside surface of the ends of the internal tube mandrel 232 and an outside surface of the braided tubular member 208 radially constrained by an inside surface 233 of the external tube member 234, may then be subjected to an appropriate heat treatment. The heat treatment may be configured such that the resilient filaments 14 of the braided tubular member 208 assume or are otherwise shape-set to the globular contour of the filaments 14 generated by the fixture 230. In some embodiments, the filamentary elements 14 of the permeable shell 40 may be held by a fixture configured to hold the braided tubular member 208 in a desired shape and heated to about 475-525 degrees C. for about 5-10 minutes to shape-set the structure. The internal tube mandrel 232 and inside surface 233 of the external tube member 234 may be so configured to have any desired shape so as to produce a shape set tubular braided member 208 that forms a permeable shell 40 having a desired shape and size such as the globular configuration of the device of
As shown, the arced portion of the filaments 1110 may have a sinusoidal-like shape with a first or outer radius 1126 and a second or inner radius 1128 near a first end of the permeable shell as shown in
The first radius 1126 and second radius 1128 of the permeable shell 1106 may be between about 0.12 mm to about 3 mm for some embodiments. For some embodiments, the distance between the first end 1112 and second end 1114 may be less than about 60% of the overall length of the support structure. A gap between the hubs at the first end and second end may allow for the distal or second end hub to flex downward toward the proximal or first end hub 1112 when the device meets resistance at the distal end and thus provides longitudinal conformance. The filaments 1110 may be shaped such that there are no portions that are without curvature over a distance of more than about 2 millimeters. Thus, for some embodiments, each filament 1110 may have a substantially continuous curvature. This substantially continuous curvature may provide smooth deployment and may reduce the risk of vessel perforation. The distal or second end 1104 may be retracted or everted to a greater extent than the proximal end such that the distal end portion of the permeable shell may be more radially conformal than the proximal end portion. Conformability of a distal end portion may provide better device conformance to irregular shaped aneurysms or other vascular defects. A convex surface of the device may flex inward forming a concave surface to conform to curvature of a vascular site.
For some embodiments, material may be attached to filaments 14 of the permeable shell 40 of a device 10 such that it substantially reduces the size of the fenestrations, cells or pores 64 between filaments 14 and thus reduces the porosity in that area. For example, coating embodiments may be disposed on portions of the filaments 14 to create small fenestrations or cells and thus higher density of the permeable shell 40. Active materials such as a responsive hydrogel may be attached or otherwise incorporated into permeable shell 40 of some embodiments such that it swells upon contact with liquids over time to reduce the porosity of the permeable shell 40.
Device embodiments 10 discussed herein may be coated with various polymers to enhance it performance, fixation and/or biocompatibility. In addition, device embodiments 10 may be made of various biomaterials known in the art of implant devices including but not limited to polymers, metals, biological materials and composites thereof. Device embodiments discussed herein may include cells and/or other biologic material to promote healing. Device embodiments discussed herein may also be constructed to provide the elution or delivery of one or more beneficial drugs, other bioactive substances or both into the blood or the surrounding tissue.
Permeable shell embodiments 40 of devices for treatment of a patient's vasculature 10 may include multiple layers. A first or outer layer may be constructed from a material with low bioactivity and hemocompatibility so as to minimize platelet aggregation or attachment and thus the propensity to form clot and thrombus. Optionally, an outer layer may be coated or incorporate an antithrombogenic agent such as heparin or other antithrombogenic agents described herein or known in the art. One or more inner layers disposed towards the vascular defect in a deployed state relative to the first layer may be constructed of materials that have greater bioactivity and/or promote clotting and thus enhance the formation of an occlusive mass of clot and device within the vascular defect. Some materials that have been shown to have bioactivity and/or promote clotting include silk, polylactic acid (PLA), polyglycolic acid (PGA), collagen, alginate, fibrin, fibrinogen, fibronectin, Methylcellulose, gelatin, Small Intestinal Submucosa (SIS), poly-N-acetylglucosamine and copolymers or composites thereof.
Bioactive agents suitable for use in the embodiments discussed herein may include those having a specific action within the body as well as those having nonspecific actions. Specific action agents are typically proteinaceous, including thrombogenic types and/or forms of collagen, thrombin and fibrogen (each of which may provide an optimal combination of activity and cost), as well as elastin and von Willebrand factor (which may tend to be less active and/or expensive agents), and active portions and domains of each of these agents. Thrombogenic proteins typically act by means of a specific interaction with either platelets or enzymes that participate in a cascade of events leading eventually to clot formation. Agents having nonspecific thrombogenic action are generally positively charged molecules, e.g., polymeric molecules such as chitosan, polylysine, poly(ethylenimine) or acrylics polymerized from acrylimide or methacrylamide which incorporate positively-charged groups in the form of primary, secondary, or tertiary amines or quaternary salts, or non-polymeric agents such as (tridodecylmethylammonium chloride). Positively charged hemostatic agents promote clot formation by a non-specific mechanism, which includes the physical adsorption of platelets via ionic interactions between the negative charges on the surfaces of the platelets and the positive charges of the agents themselves.
Device embodiments 10 herein may include a surface treatment or coating on a portion, side or all surfaces that promotes or inhibits thrombosis, clotting, healing or other embolization performance measure. The surface treatment or coating may be a synthetic, biologic or combination thereof. For some embodiments, at least a portion of an inner surface of the permeable shell 40 may have a surface treatment or coating made of a biodegradable or bioresorbable material such as a polylactide, polyglycolide or a copolymer thereof. Another surface treatment or coating material which may enhance the embolization performance of a device includes a polysachharide such as an alginate based material. Some coating embodiments may include extracellular matrix proteins such as ECM proteins. One example of such a coating may be Finale Prohealing coating which is commercially available from Surmodics Inc., Eden Prairie, MN Another exemplary coating may be Polyzene-F which is commercially available from CeloNovo BioSciences, Inc., Newnan, GA In some embodiments, the coatings may be applied with a thickness that is less than about 25% of a transverse dimension of the filaments 14.
Antiplatelet agents may include aspirin, glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors (including, abciximab, eptifibatide, tirofiban, lamifiban, fradafiban, cromafiban, toxifiban, XV454, lefradafiban, klerval, lotrafiban, orbofiban, and xemilofiban), dipyridamole, apo-dipyridamole, persantine, prostacyclin, ticlopidine, clopidogrel, cromafiban, cilostazol, and nitric oxide. To deliver nitric oxide, device embodiments may include a polymer that releases nitric oxide. Device embodiments 10 may also deliver or include an anticoagulant such as heparin, low molecular weight heparin, hirudin, warfarin, bivalirudin, hirudin, argatroban, forskolin, ximelagatran, vapiprost, prostacyclin and prostacyclin analogues, dextran, synthetic antithrombin, Vasoflux, argatroban, efegatran, tick anticoagulant peptide, Ppack, HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, and thromboxane A2 receptor inhibitors.
In some embodiments, the permeable shell 40 of a device 10 may be coated with a composition that may include nanoscale structured materials or precursors thereof (e.g., self-assembling peptides). The peptides may have with alternating hydrophilic and hydrophobic monomers that allow them to self-assemble under physiological conditions. The composition may comprise a sequence of amino acid residues. In some embodiments, the permeable shell may include a thin metallic film material. The thin film metal may be fabricated by sputter deposition and may be formed in multiple layers. The thin film may be a nickel-titanium alloy also known as nitinol.
With regard to the above detailed description, like reference numerals used therein refer to like elements that may have the same or similar dimensions, materials and configurations. While particular forms of embodiments have been illustrated and described, it will be apparent that various modifications can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the embodiments of the invention. Accordingly, it is not intended that the invention be limited by the forgoing detailed description.
This application is a continuation of and claims priority from U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/656,879, filed Jul. 21, 2017, which is a continuation of and claims priority from U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/771,632, filed Feb. 20, 2013, now abandoned, which is a continuation of and claims priority from U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/434,465, filed May 1, 2009, by Cox et al., titled “Filamentary Devices for Treatment of Vascular Defects”, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,597,087, which claims the benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C. section 119(e) from U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/050,124 filed May 2, 2008, by Cox et al. titled “Filamentary Devices for Treatment of Vascular Defects”, all of which are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety. This application is related to Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/044,822, filed Apr. 14, 2008, entitled “Methods and Devices for Treatment of Vascular Defects”, naming Brian J. Cox et al. as inventors and Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/941,928, filed on Jun. 4, 2007, entitled “Method and Apparatus for Treatment of a Vascular Defect,” naming Brian J. Cox et al. as inventors, and U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/094,683, filed on Jul. 9, 2007, entitled “Vascular Occlusion Devices,” naming Brian J. Cox et al. as inventors, and U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/097,366, filed on Sep. 11, 2007, entitled “Method and Apparatus for Treatment of a Vascular Defect,” naming Dean Schaefer et al. as inventors, and International PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2008/065694, published Dec. 11, 2008, number WO 2008/151204, filed Jun. 3, 2008, entitled “Methods and Devices for Treatment of Vascular Defects”, naming Brian J. Cox et al. as inventors, which are all incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3874388 | King et al. | Apr 1975 | A |
| 4282875 | Serbinenko | Aug 1981 | A |
| 4346712 | Handa et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
| 4402319 | Handa et al. | Sep 1983 | A |
| 4619246 | Molgaard-Nielsen et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
| 4675361 | Ward | Jun 1987 | A |
| 4729278 | Graeff | Mar 1988 | A |
| 4998539 | Delsanti | Mar 1991 | A |
| 5061275 | Wallsten et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5071407 | Termin et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
| 5108407 | Geremia et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
| 5122136 | Gluglielmi et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5154705 | Fleischhacker et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
| 5158545 | Trudell et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
| 5165421 | Fleischhacker et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
| 5263963 | Garrison | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5334210 | Gianturco | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5378239 | Termin | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5536247 | Thornton | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5562725 | Schmitt et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5569245 | Gluglielmi et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5578074 | Mirigian | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5591222 | Susawa et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5601595 | Smith | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5630840 | Mayer | May 1997 | A |
| D380266 | Boatman et al. | Jun 1997 | S |
| 5645559 | Hachtman et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5725552 | Kotula | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5725570 | Heath | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5733294 | Forber | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5749883 | Halpern | May 1998 | A |
| 5759161 | Ogawa | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5766219 | Horton | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5846261 | Kotula et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5873907 | Frantzen | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5907893 | Zadno-Azizi | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5916235 | Guglielmi | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5925060 | Forber | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5927345 | Samson | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5928260 | Chin et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5935148 | Villar et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5944733 | Engelson | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5944738 | Amplatz | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5951599 | McCrory | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5964797 | Ho | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5980554 | Lenker et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5984929 | Bashiri et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5989242 | Saadat et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6033423 | Ken et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6063070 | Eder | May 2000 | A |
| 6063104 | Villar et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6086577 | Ken et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6093199 | Brown et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6123715 | Amplatz | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6139564 | Teoh et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6142975 | Jalisi et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6152144 | Lesh et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6156061 | Wallace et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6159206 | Ogawa | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6168615 | Ken et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6168618 | Frantzen | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6168622 | Mazzocchi | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6190402 | Horton et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6193708 | Ken et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6203779 | Ricci et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6221086 | Forber | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6238403 | Greene, Jr. et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6277126 | Barry et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6290721 | Heath | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6315709 | Garibaldi et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6325815 | Kusleika | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6342068 | Thompson | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6344048 | Chin et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6346117 | Greenhalgh | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6350270 | Roue | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6368338 | Konya | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6368339 | Amplatz | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6375668 | Gifford | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6375670 | Greenhalgh | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6383174 | Eder | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6391037 | Greenhalgh | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6425914 | Wallace et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6428558 | Jones et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6447531 | Amplatz | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6454780 | Wallace | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6461370 | Gray et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6463317 | Kucharczyk | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6468266 | Bashiri et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6478773 | Gandhi et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6500149 | Gandhi et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
| 6506204 | Mazzocchi | Jan 2003 | B2 |
| 6511468 | Cragg et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6551303 | Van Tassel et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6579303 | Amplatz | Jun 2003 | B2 |
| 6585748 | Jeffree | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6589256 | Forber | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6589265 | Palmer et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6599308 | Amplatz | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6605102 | Mazzocchi et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6605111 | Bose et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
| 6607539 | Hayashi et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6613074 | Mitelberg | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6626939 | Burnside et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6632241 | Hancock | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6635068 | Dubrul et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6638257 | Amplatz | Oct 2003 | B2 |
| 6652556 | Tassel et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6666882 | Bose et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6669721 | Bose et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6682546 | Amplatz | Jan 2004 | B2 |
| 6689150 | Tassel | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6689486 | Ho et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6719778 | Van Tassel et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
| 6730119 | Smalling | May 2004 | B1 |
| 6743236 | Barry et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6743251 | Eder | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6746468 | Sepetka et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6746890 | Gupta et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6752826 | Holloway et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6780196 | Chin et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6811560 | Jones et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6818006 | Douk et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6855153 | Saadat | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6855154 | Abdel-Gawwad | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6878384 | Cruise et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6936055 | Ken et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
| 6940209 | Henderson | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6953472 | Palmer et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
| 6953473 | Porter | Oct 2005 | B2 |
| 6966892 | Gandhi et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 6994092 | van der Burg et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7001409 | Amplatz | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7004962 | Stinson | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7011671 | Welch | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7044958 | Douk et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7052513 | Thompson | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7083632 | Avellanet et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7101390 | Nelson | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7122043 | Greenhalgh et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7128736 | Abrams et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
| 7179276 | Barry et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7182774 | Barry et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7195636 | Avellanet et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7198613 | Gandhi et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7201918 | Cruise | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7229454 | Tran | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7229461 | Chin et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7275471 | Nishri et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7326225 | Ferrera et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7329279 | Haug et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7331980 | Dubrul | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7410482 | Murphy | Aug 2008 | B2 |
| 7419503 | Pulnev et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7490396 | Bradley | Feb 2009 | B2 |
| 7524319 | Dubrul | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7569066 | Gerberding | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7573382 | Choubey et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7575582 | Gandhi et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7578826 | Gandhi et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7597704 | Frazier et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
| 7648532 | Greenhalgh et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
| 7695488 | Berenstein | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7722637 | Barry et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7745732 | Michael et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7806919 | Bloom et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7862577 | Gray et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 7942925 | Yodaf | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7989703 | Schaffer | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8043326 | Hancock | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8043329 | Khairkhahan | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8066757 | Ferrera et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8142456 | Rosqueta et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8182506 | Fitz et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8192480 | Tieu et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8313505 | Amplatz et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8398670 | Amplatz | Mar 2013 | B2 |
| 8430012 | Marchand | Apr 2013 | B1 |
| 8506619 | Ortiz et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
| 8551132 | Eskridge et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8597320 | Sepetka | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8597323 | Plaza et al. | Dec 2013 | B1 |
| 8690907 | Janardhan et al. | Apr 2014 | B1 |
| 8715338 | Frid | May 2014 | B2 |
| 8728117 | Janardhan et al. | May 2014 | B1 |
| 8747430 | Porter | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 8758395 | Kleshinski et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 8795330 | Janardhan et al. | Aug 2014 | B1 |
| 8840735 | Schaffer | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8845679 | Janardhan et al. | Sep 2014 | B1 |
| 9078658 | Hewitt et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
| 9161758 | Figulla et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
| 9198668 | Theobald et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
| 9198670 | Hewitt et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
| 9259337 | Cox et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
| 9272323 | Schaffer | Mar 2016 | B2 |
| 9295473 | Hewitt et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
| 9492174 | Hewitt et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
| 9504588 | Sadisivan et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
| 9597087 | Marchand et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
| 9629635 | Hewitt et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
| 9687245 | Molaei et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
| 9855047 | Berez et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
| 9955976 | Hewitt et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
| 10123803 | Ferrera et al. | Nov 2018 | B2 |
| 10130372 | Griffin | Nov 2018 | B2 |
| 10136896 | Hewitt et al. | Nov 2018 | B2 |
| 10238393 | Marchand et al. | Mar 2019 | B2 |
| 10260182 | Thompson et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
| 10260183 | Marchand et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
| 10398441 | Warner et al. | Sep 2019 | B2 |
| 10426589 | Van der Burg et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
| 10470773 | Maguire et al. | Nov 2019 | B2 |
| 10617426 | Aboytes et al. | Apr 2020 | B2 |
| 10716573 | Connor | Jul 2020 | B2 |
| 10736758 | Ruvalcaba et al. | Aug 2020 | B2 |
| 10813645 | Hewitt et al. | Oct 2020 | B2 |
| 10856880 | Badruddin et al. | Dec 2020 | B1 |
| 10939914 | Hewitt et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
| 10952739 | Plaza et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
| 11033277 | Wolfe et al. | Jun 2021 | B2 |
| 11058431 | Pereira et al. | Jul 2021 | B2 |
| 11185335 | Badruddin et al. | Nov 2021 | B2 |
| 11202636 | Zaidat et al. | Dec 2021 | B2 |
| 11284901 | Griffin | Mar 2022 | B2 |
| 11389174 | Griffin | Jul 2022 | B2 |
| 11559309 | Rangwala et al. | Jan 2023 | B2 |
| 20010031981 | Evans et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
| 20020065552 | Jayaraman et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020103542 | Bilbo | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020111647 | Khairkhahan et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020143349 | Gifford, III et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020143361 | Douk et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020156499 | Konya et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020169473 | Sepetka et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020183787 | Wahr et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020187288 | Lim et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030012816 | West et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030028209 | Teoh | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030040771 | Hyodoh et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030167068 | Amplatz | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030171739 | Murphy et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030171774 | Freudenthal et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030181942 | Sutton et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030187473 | Berenstein et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030199913 | Dubrul et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20040059370 | Green, Jr. et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040098027 | Tech et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040111147 | Rabkin et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040122367 | Sculati et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040143239 | Zhou et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040158311 | Berhow | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040172053 | Barry et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040186562 | Cox | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040193206 | Gerberding et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040193208 | Talpade et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040220563 | Eder | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040260333 | Dubrul et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050021075 | Bonnette et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050033408 | Jones et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050053782 | Sen et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050096728 | Ramer | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050112349 | Laurencin et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050113861 | Corcoran et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050113868 | Devellian et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050119684 | Gutterman et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050133046 | Becker et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050137623 | Jones et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050149173 | Hunter et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050216052 | Mazzocchi et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050222489 | Rahdert et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050228422 | Machold et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050228434 | Amplatz et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050267516 | Soleimani et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050277978 | Greenhalgh | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060009798 | Callister et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060009799 | Kleshinski et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060009800 | Christianson et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060052815 | Fitz et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060052816 | Bates et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060064151 | Guterman et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060083721 | Cohen et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060106421 | Teoh | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060116708 | Ogawa et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060135947 | Soltesz et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060155323 | Porter et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060178694 | Greenhalgh et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060200192 | Fitz et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060200234 | Hines | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060212055 | Karabey et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060217799 | Mailander et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060235464 | Avellanet et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060247680 | Amplatz et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060252984 | Rahdert et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060253149 | Gandhi et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060271086 | Ramzipoor et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20070021816 | Rudin | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070031584 | Roth | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070061006 | Desatnik et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070088387 | Eskridge et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070100419 | Licata et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070106323 | Barry et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070112380 | Figulla et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070142906 | Figulla et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070144124 | Schewe et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070167911 | Gandhi et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070167980 | Figulla et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070173928 | Morsi | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070203062 | Ellis-Behnke et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070208373 | Zaver et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070208376 | Meng | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070225760 | Moszner et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070233186 | Meng | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070255388 | Rudakov et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070265656 | Amplatz et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070288083 | Hines | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070299464 | Cruise et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080033341 | Grad | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080033366 | Matson | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080033475 | Meng | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080033478 | Meng | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080097495 | Feller, III et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080119886 | Greenhalgh et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080161936 | Feller et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080188923 | Chu | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080195139 | Donald et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080200945 | Amplatz et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080221600 | Dieck et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080228215 | Strauss et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080281350 | Sepetka et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20090025820 | Adams | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090062812 | Fitz et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090062834 | Moftakhar | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090062841 | Amplatz et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090082803 | Adams et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090099647 | Glimsdale et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090112305 | Goldmann et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090132024 | Berkhoff | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090163780 | Tieu | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090227976 | Calabria | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090275974 | Marchand | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090287291 | Becking et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090287294 | Rosqueta et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090318948 | Linder et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100004679 | Osypka | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100023048 | Mach | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100023105 | Levy et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100069948 | Veznedaroglu et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100094409 | Barker et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100106235 | Kariniemi et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20110022149 | Cox | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110029008 | Gesswein | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110046658 | Connor et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110046719 | Frid | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110054515 | Bridgeman | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110082493 | Samson et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110144669 | Becking et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110152823 | Mohiuddin et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110152993 | Marchand | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110202085 | Loganathan et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110208227 | Becking | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110208233 | McGuckin | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110224776 | Sepekta et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110295298 | Moszner | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110319926 | Becking | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20120065667 | Javois et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120143237 | Cam | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120165919 | Cox | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120197283 | Marchand et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120271337 | Figulla et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20120283768 | Cox | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120330341 | Becking et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20130066357 | Aboytes et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130092012 | Marchand et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130116722 | Aboytes et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130123830 | Becking et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130211495 | Halden et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130239790 | Thompson et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130245667 | Marchand et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130268053 | Molaei et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130274862 | Cox et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130274863 | Cox et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130274866 | Cox et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130274868 | Cox et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130296912 | Ottma | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20130325051 | Martin et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20140005713 | Bowman et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140005714 | Quick et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140018841 | Peiffer et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140052233 | Cox et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140058436 | Rosenbluth et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140074151 | Tischler et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140135734 | Dakin et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140135817 | Tischler et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140135827 | Amplatz et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140142611 | Plaza et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140172001 | Becking et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140200607 | Sepetka et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140257360 | Keillor | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140257361 | Prom | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140318354 | Thompson et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140318355 | Marchand et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140330299 | Rosenbluth et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20140358178 | Hewitt et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20150012033 | Plaza et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150133989 | Lubock et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150182674 | Schaffer | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20150272589 | Lorenzo | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150283363 | Hewitt et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150313605 | Griffin | Nov 2015 | A1 |
| 20150374483 | Janardhan et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
| 20160015396 | Cox et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
| 20160015398 | Hewitt et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
| 20160030052 | Cragg et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
| 20160045201 | Rosenbluth et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
| 20160100842 | Plaza et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
| 20160192941 | Hewitt et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
| 20160249934 | Hewitt et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
| 20160249935 | Hewitt et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
| 20160249937 | Marchand et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
| 20160262769 | Cragg et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
| 20160324528 | Hebert et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
| 20160324668 | Wallace et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
| 20160335757 | Florent et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
| 20160367260 | Hewitt et al. | Dec 2016 | A9 |
| 20170035437 | Sarge et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
| 20170079662 | Rhee et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
| 20170095254 | Hewitt et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
| 20170128077 | Hewitt et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
| 20170224350 | Shimizu et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
| 20170245862 | Cox et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
| 20170258473 | Plaza et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
| 20180000489 | Marchand et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
| 20180070955 | Greene, Jr. et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
| 20180140305 | Connor | May 2018 | A1 |
| 20180153554 | Walzman | Jun 2018 | A1 |
| 20180185130 | Janardhan et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
| 20180206849 | Hewitt et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
| 20180206851 | Walzman | Jul 2018 | A1 |
| 20180271540 | Merritt et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
| 20180303486 | Rosenbluth et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
| 20180338767 | Dasnurkar et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
| 20190046209 | Plaza et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
| 20190059909 | Griffin | Feb 2019 | A1 |
| 20190192166 | Hewitt et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
| 20190192167 | Lorenzo | Jun 2019 | A1 |
| 20190209180 | Kealey et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
| 20190218696 | Thompson et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
| 20190223876 | Badruddin et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
| 20190223881 | Hewitt et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
| 20190269414 | Griffin | Sep 2019 | A1 |
| 20190298364 | Walsh et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
| 20190343533 | Costalat | Nov 2019 | A1 |
| 20190365385 | Gorochow et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
| 20200038035 | Griffin | Feb 2020 | A1 |
| 20200113576 | Gorochow et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
| 20200289124 | Rangwala et al. | Sep 2020 | A1 |
| 20200289125 | Dholakia et al. | Sep 2020 | A1 |
| 20200289126 | Hewitt et al. | Sep 2020 | A1 |
| 20210007754 | Milhous et al. | Jan 2021 | A1 |
| 20210128165 | Pulugurtha et al. | May 2021 | A1 |
| 20210153871 | Griffin | May 2021 | A1 |
| 20220323084 | Schiffer | Feb 2022 | A1 |
| 20220257260 | Hewitt et al. | Aug 2022 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2009242528 | Mar 2016 | AU |
| 2722037 | Oct 2009 | CA |
| 106974691 | Jul 2017 | CN |
| 0706876 | Jul 2000 | EP |
| 0808138 | May 2005 | EP |
| 1576929 | Sep 2005 | EP |
| 1844717 | Oct 2007 | EP |
| 1923019 | May 2008 | EP |
| 2055263 | Jun 2009 | EP |
| 2258275 | Dec 2011 | EP |
| 2596754 | May 2013 | EP |
| 2157937 | Mar 2017 | EP |
| 2333169 | Jun 1997 | FR |
| 52141092 | Nov 1977 | JP |
| H4-47415 | Apr 1992 | JP |
| WO 9530384 | Nov 1995 | WO |
| WO 199601591 | Jan 1996 | WO |
| WO 199726939 | Jul 1997 | WO |
| WO 199903404 | Jan 1999 | WO |
| WO 199905977 | Feb 1999 | WO |
| WO 199962432 | Dec 1999 | WO |
| WO 0145571 | Jun 2001 | WO |
| WO 200193782 | Dec 2001 | WO |
| WO 200200139 | Jan 2002 | WO |
| WO 2003011151 | Feb 2003 | WO |
| WO 2003032818 | Apr 2003 | WO |
| WO 2003063732 | Aug 2003 | WO |
| WO 2004047649 | Jun 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004093742 | Nov 2004 | WO |
| WO 2005117718 | Dec 2005 | WO |
| WO 2006026744 | Mar 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006055683 | May 2006 | WO |
| WO 2007006139 | Jan 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007096183 | Aug 2007 | WO |
| WO 2008151204 | Dec 2008 | WO |
| WO 2009036219 | Mar 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009048700 | Apr 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009121006 | Oct 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009126747 | Oct 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009132045 | Oct 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009134337 | Nov 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009135166 | Nov 2009 | WO |
| WO 2010134914 | Nov 2010 | WO |
| WO 2011057002 | May 2011 | WO |
| WO 2013102848 | Jul 2013 | WO |
| WO 2013119332 | Aug 2013 | WO |
| WO 2014087245 | Jun 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014169261 | Oct 2014 | WO |
| WO 2015160721 | Oct 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015171268 | Nov 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015192019 | Dec 2015 | WO |
| WO 2017153603 | Sep 2017 | WO |
| WO 2018051187 | Mar 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018058033 | Mar 2018 | WO |
| WO 2019040494 | Feb 2019 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| A Complete Microcatheter Portfolio; A Broad Selection of Microcatheters. Boston Scientific Brochure 2007. |
| Allen et al., “Micromachine Wedge Stepping Motor,” pp. 1-6, Nov. 12-20, 1998 ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress, Anaheim, CA. |
| Altes et al., “Creation of Saccular Aneurysms in the Rabbit: A model Suitable for Testing Endovascular Devices,” American Roentgen Ray Society, Feb. 2000. |
| Ansari et al., “Thrombosis of a Fusiform Intracranial Aneurysm Induced by Overlapping Neuroform Stents: Case Report,” Neurosurgery, E950-E951 vol. 60, No. 5, May 2007. |
| Atritech Press Release, Minneapolis, Jun. 18, 2007 “Atritech Announces Intellectual Property Acquisition, Transaction Establishes Company as leader in Left Atrial Appendage Market.” |
| Caroff, J. et al., “Woven Endobridge (WEB) Device for endovascular treatment of ruptured intracranial wide-neck aneurysms: a single-center experience,” Neuroradiology, 56(9):755-761 (Sep. 2014). |
| Caroff, J. et al., “Role of C-Arm VasoCT in the Use of Endovascular WEB Flow Disruption in Intracranial Aneurysm Treatment,” AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 35(7):1353-1357 (Jul. 2014). |
| Colla, R. et al., “Treatment of Wide-Neck Basilar Tip Aneurysms Using the Web II Device,” The Neuroradiology Journal 26(6):669-677 (Dec. 2013). |
| De Backer, O. et al., “Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: an update,” Open Heart, 4:1-14 (2013). |
| Ding, Y.H. et al., “The Woven EndoBridge: A New Aneurysm Occlusion Device,” AJNR Am. J. Neruradiol. 32:607-611 (Mar. 2011). |
| Duerig, T.W., “The Use of Superelasticity in Modern Medicine,” MRS Bulletin, pp. 101-104 (Feb. 2002). |
| Fiorella, D. et al., “Interobserver variability in the assessment of aneurysm occlusion with the WEB aneurysm embolization system,” J. NeuroIntervent. Surg. Jul. 1, 2014, pii: neurintsurg-2014-011251. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011251 [Epub ahead of print]. |
| Fort Wayne Metals HHS Tube brochure, p. 28-29 (2009), Fort Wayne, Indiana, www.oldsite.fwmetals.com. |
| Grabenwoger et al., “Endothelialization of Biosynthetic vascular Prosthesis After Laser Perforation,” Ann Thorac Surg, 66:S110-S114 (1998). |
| Guider Softip XF Guide Catheters Brochure, Boston Scientific Corporation 2004. |
| Gupta et al., “Nitinol Thin Film Three Dimensional Devices-Fabrication and Applications,” From: SMST-2003: Proceedings of the International Conference on Shape Memory and Superelastic Technologies Published: 2004. |
| Hill et al., “Initial Results ofthe AMPLATZER® Vascular Plug in the treatment of Congenital Heart Disease,” Technology and Services, Business Briefing: US Cardiology, pp. 1-3 (2004) |
| Jeffree et al., “The Porus, Guidewire-Directed, Detachable Aneurysm Liner: A New Concept in the Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms,” AJNR Am J Neuradiol 20:774-779 (May 1999). |
| Kallmes et al., “A New Endoluminal, Flow-Disrupting Device for Treatment of Saccular Eneurysms,” Stroke, Journal of the American Heart Association 38:1-7 (2007). |
| Klisch, J. et al., “The Woven EndoBridge Cerebral Aneurysm Embolization Device (Web II): initial clinical experience,” Neuroradiology 53:599-607 (2011). |
| Kónya, A. et al., “Preliminary Results with a New Vascular Basket Occluder in Swine,” JVIR, 10(8):1043-1049 (1999). |
| Kwon et al., “Preliminary Results of the Luna Aneurysm Embolization System in a Rabbit Model: A New Intrasaccular Aneurysm Occlusion Device,” AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 32:602-606 (Mar. 2011). |
| Lendlein, A. et al., “Shape-Memory Polymers,” Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 41:2034-2057 (2002). |
| Lendlein, A. et al., “Biodegradable, Elastic Shape—Memory Polymers for Potential Biomedical Applications,” Science 296:1673-1676 (May 31, 2002). |
| Lieber, B.B. et al., “The Role of Blood Impulse in Cerebral Aneurysm Coil Compaction: Effect of Aneurysm Neck Size,” IMECE2003-43099, Proceedings of IMECE '03, 2003 ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress, Washington, D.C. (Nov. 15-21, 2003). |
| Liu, C. et al., “Review of progress in shape—memory polymers,” J. Mater. Chem. 17:1543-1558 (2007). |
| Lubicz, B. et al., “WEB Device for Endovascular Treatment of Wide-Neck Bifurcation Aneurysms,” AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 34(6): 1209-1214 (Jun.-Jul. 2013). |
| Lubicz, B. et al., “WEB-DL Endovascular Treatment of Wide-Neck Bifurcation Aneurysms: Short- and Midterm Results in a European Study,” AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 35(3):432-438 (Mar. 2014). doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A3869. Epub Jan. 23, 2014. |
| Major, S. et al., “Life of Nitinol Drawn Filed Wires with Ag or Au Core for Medical Application,” International Journal of Mechanics 2(7):73-80 (2013). |
| Matinlinna et al., “An Introduction to Silanes and Their Clinical Applications in Dentistry,” The International Journal of Prosthodontics, 17(2):155-164 (2004). |
| Mine et al., “Intrasaccular flow-diversion for treatment of intracranial aneurysms: the Woven EndoBridge,” Expert Rev. Med. Devices11(3): 315-325 (May 2014). doi: 10.1586/17434440.2014.907741. Epub Apr. 2, 2014. |
| Nakayama et al., “Development of Microporous Covered Stents: Geometrical Design of the Luminal Surface,” The International Journal of Artificial Organs, 28(6):600-608 (2005). |
| Nemat-Nasser, S. et al., “Superelastic and cyclic response of NiTi SMA at various strain rates and temperatures,” Mechanics of Materials 38:463-474 (2006). |
| Nishi et al., “Embolization of experimental aneurysms using a heparin-loaded stent graft with micropores,” Cardiovascular Radiation Medicine 4:29-33 (2003). |
| Nishi et al., “Occlusion of Experimental Aneurysms with Heparin-Loaded, Microporous Stent Grafts,” Neurosurgery 53(6):1397-1405 (Dec. 2003). |
| Papagiannaki, C. et al., “WEB Intrasaccular Flow Disruptor—Prospective, Multicenter Experience in 83 Patients with 85 Aneurysms,” AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 35(11):2106-2111 (Nov.-Dec. 2014). 35(11):2106-11. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4028. Epub Jul. 3, 2014. |
| Park, J. et al., “Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Transcatheter Occlusion (PLAATO) for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation: 2-Year Outcome,” J Invasive. Cardiol., 21(9):446-450 (2009). |
| Pelton, A.R. et al., “Optimisation of processing and properties of medical grade Nitinol wire,” Min. Invas. Ther. & Allied Technol. 9(1):107-118 (2000). |
| Pham, Q. et al., “Electrospinning of Polymeric Nanofibers for Tissue Engineering Applications: A Review,” Tissue Engr 12(5):1197-1211 (1996). |
| Pierot, L. et al., “Intrasaccular Flow-Disruption Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms: Preliminary Results of a Multicenter Clinical Study,” AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 33(7):1232-1238 (Aug. 2012). doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A3191. Epub Jun. 7, 2012. |
| Pierot, L. et al., “Endovascular WEB Flow Disruption in Middle Cerebral Artery Aneurysms: Preliminary Feasibility, Clinical, and Anatomical Results in a Multicenter Study,” Neurosurgery 73(1):27-35 (Jul. 2013). |
| Pierot, L. et al., “Role, safety, and efficacy of WEB flow disruption: a review,” EJMINT Invited Review, 2014: 1419000139 (May 8, 2014). |
| Peirot, L. et al., “WEB Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms: Feasiblity, Complications, and 1-Month Safety Results with the WEB DL and WEB SL/SLS in the French Observatory,” AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. Feb. 5, 2015 [Epub ehead ofprint]. |
| Romero, J. et al., “Left Atrial Appendage Closure Devices,” Clinical Medicine Insights: Cardiology, 8:45-52 (2014). |
| Rottiers, W. et al., “Shape Memory Materials and their applications,” in Korolev's readings: conference proceedings, pp. 250-250 (2011). |
| Salamat et al., “Experimental Evaluation of a New Transcatheter Vascular Embolization Device in the Swine Model,” J Vasc Interv Radiol, 12:301-311 (2002). |
| Schaffer, J.E. et al., “Engineering Characteristics of Drawn Filled Nitinol Tube,” SMST-2003: Proceedings of the International Conference on Shape Memory and Superelastic Technologies (ASM International), pp. 109-118 (2004). |
| Schmitz-Rode, T. et al., “Self-expandable spindle for transcatheter vascular occlusion: in vivo experiments. Work in progress.” Radiology 188:95-100 (Jul. 1993). |
| Simgen, A. et al., “Evaluation of a newly designed flow diverter for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms in an elastase-induced aneurysm model, in New Zealand white rabbits,” Neuroradiology 56:129-137 (2014). |
| Spelle, L. et al., “Letter to the Editor,” Neuroradiol J. Jun. 2014; 27(3):369. doi: 10.15274/NRJ-2014-10048. Epub Jun. 17, 2014. |
| Stoeckel, D. et al., “Self-expanding nitinol stents: material and design considerations,” Eur. Radiol. 14:292-301 (2004). |
| Turk, A. et al., “Evaluation of the TriSpan Neck Bridge Device for the Treatment of Wide-Necked Aneurysms: An Experimental Study in Canines, Editorial Comment: An Experimental Study in Canines,” Stroke 32:492-497 (Feb. 2001). |
| Wallner, A.K. et al., “Coiling after Treatment with the Woven EndoBridge Cerebral Aneurysm Embolization Device,” Interventional Neuroradiology 18:208-212 (2012). |
| Yeow, W.L. et al., Device- and LAA-Specific Characteristics for Successful LAA Closures: Tips and Tricks, Intervent. Cardiol. Clin., 3:239-254 (2014). |
| Zimmermann et al., “Patent Foramen Oval Closure With the SeptRx Device, Initial Experience with the First “In-Tunnel” Device,” JACC Cardiovascular Interventions vol. 3, No. 9., 2010. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Oct. 31, 2008 for International Application No. PCT/US2008/065694. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Nov. 26, 2009 for International Application No. PCT/US2009/042592. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jul. 28, 2011 for International Application No. PCT/US2010/055494. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jul. 21, 2015 for International Application No. PCT/US2015/025609. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jan. 11, 2016 for International Application No. PCT/US2015/025613. |
| Extended European Search Report dated Apr. 24, 2014, in EP Appl No. EP 08770070 filed Jun. 3, 2008. |
| Extended European Search Report dated Jul. 30, 2014, in EP Appl No. EP 10829110 filed Nov. 4, 2010. |
| Extended European Search Report dated Dec. 13, 2017, in EP Appl No. EP 15789225 filed Nov. 7, 2016. |
| Indian Examination Report dated Apr. 4, 2019, in IN Appl. No. 3614/DELNP/2012. |
| Japanese Official Action dated Mar. 8, 2019, in JP Appl. No. 2016-562549. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Jun. 10, 2020 for International Application No. PCT/US2020/022275. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Jun. 11, 2020 for International Application No. PCT/US2020/022364. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Jun. 15, 2020 for International Application No. PCT/US2020/022319. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Jul. 24, 2020 for International Application No. PCT/US2020/022096. |
| Final Office Action mailed Mar. 12, 2024 for Japanese Application No. 2022-169903. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20200281603 A1 | Sep 2020 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61050124 | May 2008 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 15656879 | Jul 2017 | US |
| Child | 16803515 | US | |
| Parent | 13771632 | Feb 2013 | US |
| Child | 15656879 | US | |
| Parent | 12434465 | May 2009 | US |
| Child | 13771632 | US |
