Filesystem directory debug log

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8112675
  • Patent Number
    8,112,675
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, September 28, 2006
    18 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, February 7, 2012
    12 years ago
Abstract
A system for handling debug log messages in a computerized device under test that has a filesystem and a communications link. A virtual debug folder provides one or more virtual folders wherein the debug log messages are stored as synthesized filenames. The virtual folders are then viewable via the communications link as if actual folders of the filesystem and the synthesized filenames are viewable via the communications link as if actual filenames of the filesystem.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention relates generally to error detection/correction and fault detection/recovery in computerized systems, and more particularly to means or steps for recording output from the system under test or diagnosis.


BACKGROUND ART

Dedicated debugging interfaces are widely used to log status and error messages from a running computerized system. Unfortunately, these interfaces often require specialized hardware that is expensive and difficult to use. Sometimes the debugging interface, such as the Joint Test Action Group (JTAG) interface, for example, may require its own dedicated hardware bus which has to be physically exposed outside of the system being tested or debugged. This is frequently awkward and, especially on production systems, these specialized interfaces may not be made accessible because of cost, mechanical, or security considerations.


One common solution to this problem is to log messages using another general-purpose communications bus or storage mechanism that exists on the system under test. For example, messages may be logged to a general-purpose bus (e.g., a serial port) or to a file stored on a hard disk drive. One disadvantage of this, however, is that the debugging messages may interfere with the normal purpose of the bus or storage device, especially if those mechanisms are also under test. For example, storing the debug messages in a file on a storage device might change the behavior of the native file system, by filling up storage space or by adding directory and file entries. If the file system is the module which is being tested, this might then interfere with reproduction of defects or change performance metrics. It might also be difficult to access the logged messages while the bus or storage device is under test. Instead, the messages may have to be read out after testing has been completed, thus losing any real-time logging capability.


Accordingly, what is needed is a less invasive and more real-time mechanism for exporting debugging messages on computerized systems that maintain externally accessible file system structures.


DISCLOSURE OF INVENTION

Accordingly, it is an object of the present invention to provide a debug logging mechanism for computerized systems that is embodied as a file system directory for external access.


Briefly, one preferred embodiment of the present invention is a system for handling debug log messages in a computerized device under test having a filesystem and a communications link. A virtual debug folder provides one or more virtual folders to store the debug log messages as synthesized filenames. The virtual folders are then viewable via the communications link as if they are actual folders of the filesystem and the synthesized filenames are viewable via the communications link as if they are actual filenames of the filesystem.


Briefly, another preferred embodiment of the present invention is a method for making debug log messages in a computerized device under test having a filesystem viewable via a communications link. One or more virtual folders are provide, wherein the virtual folders are viewable via the communications link as if they are actual folders of the filesystem. Synthesized filenames are then created in the virtual folders based on the debug log messages, and they also are viewable via the communications link as if actual filenames of the filesystem.


These and other objects and advantages of the present invention will become clear to those skilled in the art in view of the description of the best presently known mode of carrying out the invention and the industrial applicability of the preferred embodiment as described herein and as illustrated in the figures of the drawings.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The purposes and advantages of the present invention will be apparent from the following detailed description in conjunction with the appended figures of drawings in which:



FIG. 1 is a block diagram schematically showing an embodiment of a debug log system that is in accord with the present invention; and



FIG. 2 is a listing of synthesized filenames in a virtual folder, that is, an exemplary view of a virtual debug folder as “seen” by a host system.





In the various figures of the drawings, like references are used to denote like or similar elements or steps.


BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION

A preferred embodiment of the present invention is a debug log embodied as a file system directory. As illustrated in the various drawings herein, and particularly in the view of FIG. 1, preferred embodiments of the invention are depicted by the general reference character 10.



FIG. 1 is a block diagram schematically showing an embodiment of a debug log system 10 that is in accord with the present invention. The debug log system 10 works with a computerized device under test (DUT 12) that contains a virtual debug folder (VDF 14) which is interposed between a filesystem 16 in the DUT 12 and an external host 18 that is accessing the filesystem 16 over a communications link 20. The VDF 14 creates virtual views of one or more virtual folders containing filenames synthesized from debug log messages 22.



FIG. 2 is a listing 32 of synthesized filenames 34 a virtual folder 36, i.e., an exemplary view of the VDF 14 as “seen” by the host 18. The virtual folders 36 and synthesized filenames 34 created by the VDF 14 do not actually exist in the storage media of the filesystem 16, thus minimizing impact on the DUT 12.


The underlying filesystem 16 that is the basis of the virtualization by the VDF 14 should support filenames of significant length and richness in order to expose the debug log messages 22 efficiently. Also, some escaping of the debug log messages 22 may have to be done in order to accommodate restrictions placed on name composition by the filesystem 16. For example, many filesystems today reserve some characters for special uses. If such characters are valid in the debug log messages 22, they can be translated to other characters or character strings that are valid. For instance, the reserved colon character (“:”) can be replaced with “&58;” where the number 58 is the decimal value for the colon character in ASCII (i.e., this can be done much like some special characters are represented in HTML).


Although a VDF 14 can be created using any communications channel, one simple approach is to extend an existing remote file system protocol. Some example protocols for this include the Network Filesystem (NFS) or Server Message Block (SMB) networked file system protocols, or the Picture Transport Protocol (PTP) USB object storage and transfer protocol. Since protocols like these already have to virtualize a native filesystem for presentation to a remote file system client, creating additional virtual file system resources is straightforward and is likely to be non-intrusive and to minimally add protocol overhead.


Since the message order of the debug log messages 22 should be preserved in the virtual folder 36 (or folders) of the VDF 14, even when the host 18 applies a filename sort, the VDF 14 may prepend a log line number or other serialized value that will cause the sorted synthesized filenames 34 to be presented in debug log order. The date and time fields of the synthesized filenames 34 can also be mapped to debug log order, or to timing information contained within the debug log, so that timing information for each debug log message 22 may be determined by looking at the date and time fields of the synthesized filenames 34.


Given the amount of debugging log information that can be generated by a DUT 12, the debug log messages 22 can be distributed into many virtual folders 36 in the VDF 14, instead of just a single one. This grouping can accommodate filesystems 16 that perform poorly with large numbers of files in a single folder, and may also be used to group the debug log messages 22 by message type, time, or another attribute.


The VDF 14 can easily also implement a mechanism whereby the host 18 can completely or partially clear the device debug log, by deleting the virtual folder 36 (or folders) in the VDF 14, or by deleting individual synthesized filenames 34 (single debug messages) using normal operations of the filesystem 16.


Given the sensitivity surrounding debug messages, especially on DUTs 12 that may be shipped computerized systems already in customer hands, the VDF 14 may optionally implement encryption of the debug log messages 22, again using a display/output format that is suitable for the underlying filesystem 16. Also, a mechanism controlled by the host 18 for enabling the VDF 14 can be employed so that debug logging messages are not visible unless the host 18 has first triggered the VDF 14 by performing an enable sequence of operations in the filesystem 16. For example, by creating a virtual folder 36 named “DEBUG” in the target DUT 12. Alternately, particular attributes supported by the underlying filesystem 16, such as “HIDDEN” or “SYSTEM,” for instance, can be applied so that only sophisticated users could access the debug log messages 22.


While various embodiments have been described above, it should be understood that they have been presented by way of example only, and that the breadth and scope of the invention should not be limited by any of the above described exemplary embodiments, but should instead be defined only in accordance with the following claims and their equivalents.

Claims
  • 1. A system comprising: a virtual debug folder operable to provide at least one virtual folder, wherein said at least one virtual folder is operable to store a plurality of debug messages as a plurality of synthesized filenames, wherein each synthesized filename of said plurality of synthesized filenames corresponds to a respective debug message of said plurality of debug messages, wherein said at least one virtual folder is viewable via a communications link as at least one actual folder of a filesystem, and wherein said plurality of synthesized filenames are viewable via the communications link as a plurality of actual filenames of the filesystem.
  • 2. The system of claim 1, wherein said virtual debug folder is controllable via the communications link to perform at least one folder-level operation on said at least one virtual folder equivalent to at least one folder-level operation of the filesystem, and wherein said virtual debug folder is further controllable to perform at least one file-level operation on said plurality of synthesized filenames equivalent to at least one file-level operation of the filesystem.
  • 3. The system of claim 1, wherein said virtual debug folder is operable to escape the plurality of debug messages to accommodate restrictions placed on name composition by the filesystem.
  • 4. The system of claim 1, wherein said virtual debug folder is operable to prepend a serialized value to said plurality of synthesized filenames to order said plurality of synthesized filenames.
  • 5. The system of claim 1, wherein said virtual debug folder is operable to map said plurality of synthesized filenames to an order based on a preset criteria.
  • 6. The system of claim 5, wherein said preset criteria is associated with an order of receipt of said plurality of debug messages by said virtual debug folder.
  • 7. The system of claim 1, wherein said virtual debug folder is operable to set fields in said plurality of synthesized filenames to values based on a preset criteria.
  • 8. The system of claim 7, wherein said preset criteria is associated with an order of receipt of said plurality of debug messages by said virtual debug folder.
  • 9. The system of claim 1, wherein said virtual debug folder is operable to organize said plurality of synthesized filenames in said plurality of virtual folders based on a preset criteria.
  • 10. The system of claim 1, wherein said virtual debug folder is operable to encrypt said plurality of synthesized filenames.
  • 11. The system of claim 1, wherein said virtual debug folder is operable to be selectively commanded via the communications link to show said plurality of synthesized filenames.
  • 12. The system of claim 1, wherein said plurality of debug messages are associated with a device under test.
  • 13. A method of presenting a plurality of debug messages, the method comprising: providing at least one virtual folder, wherein said at least one virtual folder is viewable via a communications link as at least one actual folder of a filesystem; andcreating a plurality of synthesized filenames in said at least one virtual folder based on the plurality of debug messages, wherein each synthesized filename of said plurality of synthesized filenames corresponds to a respective debug message of said plurality of debug messages, wherein said plurality of synthesized filenames are viewable via the communications link as a plurality of actual filenames of the filesystem.
  • 14. The method of claim 13 further comprising: performing at least one folder-level operation on said at least one virtual folder equivalent to at least one folder-level operation of the filesystem; andperforming at least one file-level operation on said plurality of synthesized filenames equivalent to at least one file-level operation of the filesystem.
  • 15. The method of claim 13 further comprising: escaping the plurality of debug messages to accommodate restrictions placed on name composition by the filesystem.
  • 16. The method of claim 13 further comprising: prepending a serialized value to said plurality of synthesized filenames to order said plurality of synthesized filenames.
  • 17. The method of claim 13 further comprising: mapping said plurality of synthesized filenames to an order based on a preset criteria.
  • 18. The method of claim 17, wherein said preset criteria is associated with an order of receipt of the plurality of debug messages.
  • 19. The method of claim 13, wherein said creating said plurality of synthesized filenames further comprises creating said plurality of synthesized filenames in said at least one virtual folder based on a preset criteria.
  • 20. The method of claim 13 further comprising: encrypting said plurality of synthesized filenames.
  • 21. The method of claim 13 further comprising: making said plurality of synthesized filenames viewable based on at least one command via the communications link.
  • 22. The method of claim 13 further comprising: setting fields in said plurality of synthesized filenames to values based on a preset criteria.
  • 23. The method of claim 22, wherein said preset criteria is associated with an order of receipt of said plurality of debug messages.
US Referenced Citations (47)
Number Name Date Kind
5678026 Vartti et al. Oct 1997 A
5956712 Bennett et al. Sep 1999 A
6021408 Ledain et al. Feb 2000 A
6105049 Govindaraju et al. Aug 2000 A
6185580 Day, III et al. Feb 2001 B1
6230230 Joy et al. May 2001 B1
6496909 Schimmel Dec 2002 B1
6499048 Williams Dec 2002 B1
6895591 Russ et al. May 2005 B1
6961739 Lee et al. Nov 2005 B2
7120762 Rajwar et al. Oct 2006 B2
7206915 DeSouter et al. Apr 2007 B2
7266555 Coates et al. Sep 2007 B1
7290105 Jeter et al. Oct 2007 B1
7333993 Fair Feb 2008 B2
7340743 Anural et al. Mar 2008 B1
7409506 Kamigata et al. Aug 2008 B2
20020065776 Calder et al. May 2002 A1
20020078069 Moore Jun 2002 A1
20020078123 Latour Jun 2002 A1
20020083463 Camara Jun 2002 A1
20020091863 Schug Jul 2002 A1
20030120903 Roussel Jun 2003 A1
20030137680 Maruoka Jul 2003 A1
20030236771 Becker Dec 2003 A1
20040025069 Gary et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040064485 Yoshida et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040073658 Oran et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040083273 Madison et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040088316 Cleraux et al. May 2004 A1
20050038923 Kamataki Feb 2005 A1
20050050043 Pyhalammi et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050198060 Imaki et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050273701 Emerson et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060117316 Cismas et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060143154 Jager Jun 2006 A1
20070005603 Jain et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070005740 DiFalco et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070005741 Hwang et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070050727 Lewis-Bowen et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070055692 Pizzo et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070079100 Shiga et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070118819 Basin et al. May 2007 A1
20070128899 Mayer Jun 2007 A1
20070192715 Kataria et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070266289 Yang Nov 2007 A1
20080033969 Koo et al. Feb 2008 A1
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20080155347 A1 Jun 2008 US