1. Field of the Invention
Embodiments of the present invention generally relate to running a casing into a wellbore. More specifically, embodiments of the present invention relate to a fill up and circulation tool for use during a casing running operation.
2. Description of the Related Art
To obtain hydrocarbons from an earth formation, a wellbore is typically drilled to a predetermined depth using a drill string having a drill bit attached to its lower end. The drill string is then removed, and thereafter a casing is lowered into the wellbore to line the wellbore. The casing may be a casing section or, in the alternative, a casing string including two or more casing sections threadedly connected to one another.
While the casing is being lowered into the wellbore during the “casing running” operation, the pressure within the wellbore is typically higher than the pressure within the bore of the casing. This higher pressure within the wellbore exerts stress on the casing as it is being lowered into the wellbore, risking damage or collapse of the casing during run-in; thus, a casing fill-up operation is performed, where the bore of the casing being run into the wellbore is filled with a fluid (often termed “mud”) in an attempt to equalize the pressure inside the casing with the pressure outside the casing (the pressure within the wellbore) and thereby prevent collapse of the casing during the run-in operation. Pressurized fluid is typically input into the bore of the upper end of the casing using a fill line from the existing mud pumps at the well site.
At various times during the casing running operation, the casing may get stuck within the wellbore. To dislodge the casing from the wellbore, a circulating operation is performed by utilizing a circulation tool, where pressurized drilling fluid is circulated down the casing and out into the annulus to remove the obstructing debris. To “rig up” the circulating tool for circulating operation, the circulating tool is inserted into the bore of the casing at the upper end of the casing. A sealing member on the circulating tool is then activated to seal the circulating tool with the casing, forming a path for fluid flow through the circulating tool and out into the bore of the casing. Specifically, in a circulation operation, fluid is introduced into the circulating tool, flows through the bore of the casing and out the lower end of the casing to remove the obstructing debris, and then the fluid having the debris therein flows up the annulus to the surface of the wellbore.
After the circulation operation, the circulating tool is removed from the casing to allow another casing fill-up operation and further running of the casing into the wellbore to occur. During the casing running and fill-up operations, air must be allowed to escape through the bore of the casing to prevent over-pressurizing the bore of the casing. To permit the air being replaced by the fluid during the fill-up operation to escape from the bore of the casing, the circulating tool must be removed from the casing prior to the fill-up operation. To remove the circulating tool (“rig down”), the sealing member is de-activated, and the circulating tool is lifted from the bore of the casing. The casing may then be lowered further into the wellbore while filling the casing with fluid to prevent collapse of the casing.
Rigging up and rigging down the circulating tool, which are time-consuming procedures, must often be performed numerous times during a casing running operation. Therefore, attaching and re-attaching the circulating tool each time the casing is stuck within the wellbore during casing running is expensive and decreases the profitability of the well. Furthermore, because rig personnel perform the rigging up and rigging down of the circulating tool, which are often dangerous operations, numerous rigging up and rigging down operations decrease the safety of the well site.
Thus, there is a need for a circulating tool which is capable of performing both the fill-up and circulating operations without removal of the circulating tool from the casing. There is yet a further need for a circulating tool which allows air to escape while maintaining the circulating tool inside the casing during the duration of the casing running operation.
The present invention generally relates to a tool for use during tubular running operations. In one embodiment, a fill-up and circulation tool includes a mandrel; a packer assembly is disposed around the mandrel; and a valve assembly connected to the mandrel, wherein the valve assembly is configured to selectively control fluid flow into the tool and out of the tool. In another embodiment, the valve assembly includes a valve member biased in a first direction and a valve seat member biased in a second direction. In yet another embodiment, the valve member and the valve seat member are biased into engagement with each other. In yet another embodiment, fluid flow through the tool is blocked when the valve member and the valve seat member are engaged with each other. In yet another embodiment, fluid flow in the first direction will urge the valve seat member away from the valve member. In yet another embodiment, fluid flow in the second direction will urge the valve member away from the valve seat member.
In another embodiment, a method of flowing fluid into or out of a tubular includes providing a flow control tool having a valve assembly comprising a valve member engaged with a valve seat member; inserting the valve assembly into the tubular; supplying fluid in a first direction to urge a valve seat member away from the valve member, thereby allowing fluid to flow into the tubular; and flowing fluid from the tubular in a second direction to urge the valve member away from the valve seat member, thereby allowing fluid to flow out of the tubular. In yet another embodiment, the method further comprises providing a packer assembly on the flow control tool and sealingly engaging the packer assembly with the tubular. In yet another embodiment, the method further comprises energizing the packer assembly using fluid pressure in the tubular. In yet another embodiment, the method further comprises venting the packer assembly prior to removing the flow control tool from the tubular.
In another embodiment, a fill-up and circulation tool includes a mandrel and a vent valve disposed on the mandrel, wherein the vent valve is selectively moveable between an open position and a closed position. The fill-up and circulation tool further includes a packer assembly. Additionally, the fill-up and circulation tool includes a valve assembly disposed on the mandrel, wherein the valve assembly is configured to selectively control the flow of fluid through the fill-up and circulation tool.
So that the manner in which the above recited features of the present invention can be understood in detail, a more particular description of the invention, briefly summarized above, may be had by reference to embodiments, some of which are illustrated in the appended drawings. It is to be noted, however, that the appended drawings illustrate only typical embodiments of this invention and are therefore not to be considered limiting of its scope, for the invention may admit to other equally effective embodiments.
As shown, the tool 100 may include a mandrel 105, a venting valve 125, a packer assembly 150, and a mudsaver valve assembly 200. The mandrel 105 extends through the venting valve 125 and the packer assembly 150, and connects to the mudsaver valve assembly 200. The mandrel 105 includes a bore 110 that is in fluid communication with the mudsaver valve assembly 200 to allow fluid to flow through the tool 100. The mandrel 105 also includes an upper portion 115 that is configured to connect the tool 100 to a wellbore tool, such as a casing clamping tool, as will be described below.
In general, the packer assembly 150 is configured to create a seal between the tool 100 and the surrounding tubular such as a casing. The packer assembly 150 includes a packer member 155 utilizes a spring 160 that is molded into the top portion of the packer member 155. The geometry of the packer member 155 is designed to form an interference fit between an inner diameter of the casing and an outer diameter of the packer member 155. In one embodiment, the packer member 155 has an upper end that is sealed against the mandrel 105 and a lower end having an opening for access to an inner void 156 in the packer member 155. In another embodiment, the outer diameter of the lower end of the packer member 155 is smaller than an inner diameter of the surrounding casing. Further, an outer diameter above the lower end is sufficiently sized to engage the inner diameter of the surrounding casing. In one embodiment, packer member 155 is a dual durometer elastomer packer. In another embodiment, a lower portion of the packer member 155 is made of a material that is harder than an upper portion of the packer member 155. During operation, the packer member 155 is forced into the surrounding casing. As the packer member 155 energizes, the spring 160 is forced out (i.e. rolls outward) and acts as a non-extrusion barrier between the outer diameter of the packer member 155 and the inner diameter of the casing. It must be noted that use of the spring 160 is optional.
Internal pressure increase caused by air or drilling fluid may be used to energize the packer member 155 into tight engagement with the inner diameter of the casing. As shown in
In one embodiment, the tool 100 may optionally include a venting valve 125. Generally, the venting valve 125 may be used to relieve the tool 100 of downhole pressure so that drilling fluid will not spray out when the tool 100 is removed from the casing. As shown in
The use of the retainer sleeve 615 facilitates the removal of the packer 155 from the tool 600. In use, the screws 620 may be release, thereby allowing the removal of the retainer sleeve 615. Thereafter, the centralizer 610 and the packer 155 may slide off of the bottom of the tool 600. In this respect, the packer 155 may be removed while the tool 600 is maintained in the closed position.
As discussed above, embodiments of the fill-up and circulation tool may be used with various tubular gripping tools. Exemplary gripping tools including external gripping tools and internal gripping tools are disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/435,346, filed on May 4, 2009 by M. Liess, et al., entitled “Tubular Handling Apparatus”, which application is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
In all embodiments, the vent valve is optional. Further, the vent valve may be operated manually or by remote actuation from a control panel.
In another embodiment, a fill-up and circulation tool includes a mandrel; a packer assembly is disposed around the mandrel; and a valve assembly connected to the mandrel. In another embodiment, the valve assembly includes a valve member biased in a first direction; and a valve seat member biased in a second direction, wherein the valve member is biased into engagement with the valve seat member to close fluid communication through the tool.
While the foregoing is directed to embodiments of the present invention, other and further embodiments of the invention may be devised without departing from the basic scope thereof, and the scope thereof is determined by the claims that follow.
This application claims benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/050,121, filed on May 2, 2008; U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/126,223, filed on May 2, 2008; and U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/126,301, filed on May 2, 2008. Each of the above referenced patent applications is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1367156 | McAlvay et al. | Feb 1921 | A |
1822444 | MacClatchie | Sep 1931 | A |
3147992 | Haeber et al. | Sep 1964 | A |
3385370 | Knox et al. | May 1968 | A |
3698426 | Litchfield et al. | Oct 1972 | A |
3888318 | Brown | Jun 1975 | A |
4364407 | Hilliard | Dec 1982 | A |
4377179 | Giebeler | Mar 1983 | A |
4478244 | Garrett | Oct 1984 | A |
4776617 | Sato | Oct 1988 | A |
4779688 | Baugh | Oct 1988 | A |
4955949 | Bailey et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4962819 | Bailey et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4997042 | Jordan et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5152554 | LaFleur et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5172940 | Usui et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5191939 | Stokley | Mar 1993 | A |
5282653 | LaFleur et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5348351 | LaFleur et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5441310 | Barrett et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5479988 | Appleton | Jan 1996 | A |
5501280 | Brisco | Mar 1996 | A |
5509442 | Claycomb | Apr 1996 | A |
5577566 | Albright et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5584343 | Coone | Dec 1996 | A |
5645131 | Trevisani | Jul 1997 | A |
5682952 | Stokley | Nov 1997 | A |
5735348 | Hawkins, III | Apr 1998 | A |
5918673 | Hawkins et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5971079 | Mullins | Oct 1999 | A |
5992520 | Schultz et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6053191 | Hussey | Apr 2000 | A |
6102116 | Giovanni | Aug 2000 | A |
6173777 | Mullins | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6279654 | Mosing et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6289911 | Majkovic | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6309002 | Bouligny | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6390190 | Mullins | May 2002 | B2 |
6415862 | Mullins | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6431626 | Bouligny | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6460620 | LaFleur | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6571876 | Szarka | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6578632 | Mullins | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6595288 | Mosing et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6604578 | Mullins | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6640824 | Majkovic | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6666273 | Laurel | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6675889 | Mullins et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6715542 | Mullins | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6719046 | Mullins | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6722425 | Mullins | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6732819 | Wenzel | May 2004 | B2 |
6779599 | Mullins et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6832656 | Fournier, Jr. et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6883605 | Arceneaux et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
7007753 | Robichaux et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7017671 | Williford | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7096948 | Mosing et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7147254 | Niven et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7370698 | Mosing et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7490677 | Buytaert et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7635026 | Mosing et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7665515 | Mullins | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7690422 | Swietlik et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7694730 | Angman | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7694744 | Shahin | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7866390 | Latiolais, Jr. et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7874361 | Mosing et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7878237 | Angman | Feb 2011 | B2 |
20020084069 | Mosing et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20060151181 | Shahin | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20090200038 | Swietlik et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090205827 | Swietlik et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090205836 | Swietlik et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090205837 | Swietlik et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090229837 | Wiens et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090266532 | Revheim et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100032162 | Olstad et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100206583 | Swietlik et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100206584 | Clubb et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20110036586 | Hart et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 260 671 | Nov 2002 | EP |
1 019 614 | Jul 2006 | EP |
WO 9607009 | Mar 1996 | WO |
WO 0047865 | Aug 2000 | WO |
WO 2007108703 | Sep 2007 | WO |
WO 2007144597 | Dec 2007 | WO |
WO 2009114625 | Sep 2009 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100032162 A1 | Feb 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61050121 | May 2008 | US | |
61126223 | May 2008 | US | |
61126301 | May 2008 | US |