This invention relates to magnetic tape recording heads, and more particularly, to a tape recording head having a pre-recessed gap region filled with an electrical insulation material.
In magnetic storage systems, data is read from and written onto magnetic recording media utilizing magnetic transducers commonly referred to as magnetic heads. Data is written on the magnetic recording media by moving a magnetic recording head to a position over the media where the data is to be stored. The magnetic recording head then generates a magnetic field, which encodes the data into the magnetic media. Data is read from the media by similarly positioning the magnetic read head and then sensing the magnetic field of the magnetic media. Read and write operations may be independently synchronized with the movement of the media to ensure that the data can be read from and written to the desired location on the media.
An important and continuing goal in the data storage industry is that of increasing the density of data stored on a medium. For tape storage systems, that goal has lead to increasing the track density on recording tape, and decreasing the thickness of the magnetic tape medium. However, the development of small footprint, higher performance tape drive systems has created various problems in the design of a tape head assembly for use in such systems.
In a tape drive system, magnetic tape is moved over the surface of the tape head at high speed. This movement generally entrains a film of air between the head and tape. Usually the tape head is designed to minimize the spacing between the head and the tape. The spacing between the magnetic head and the magnetic tape is crucial so that the recording gaps of the transducers, which are the source of the magnetic recording flux, are in intimate or near contact with the tape to effect efficient signal transfer, and so that the read element is in intimate or near contact with the tape to provide effective coupling of the magnetic field from the tape to the read element.
A flat contour thin film tape recording head for a bi-directional tape drive is described in commonly assigned U.S. Pat. No. 5,905,613 to Biskeborn and Eaton. The flat contour head comprises a flat tape support surface on a substrate having a row of thin film transducers formed on a surface on one side of the substrate which forms a gap. The substrate with the row of transducers is called a “rowbar substrate”. The transducers are protected by a closure of the same or similar ceramic as the substrate. For a read-while-write bi-directional head which requires that the read transducer follows behind the write transducer, two rowbar substrates with closures are mounted in a carrier opposing one another. The recording tape overwraps the corners of both substrates and closures with an angle sufficient to scrape (skive) the air from the surface of the tape and not so large as to allow air to reenter between the tape and the tape support surface after the tape passes the corner. By scraping the air from the surface of the moving tape, a vacuum forms between the tape and the flat tape support surface holding the tape in contact with the tape support surface. At the corners of the air skiving edge, bending of the recording tape due to the overwrap results in separation of the tape from the tape support surface for a distance that depends on the wrap angle, the tape thickness and the tape tension. The transducers must be spaced from the corners of the air skiving edges at a sufficient distance to allow the pressure difference between ambient air and the vacuum between the tape and the tape support surface to overcome this separation.
Recession of the gap region between the hard ceramic substrate and closure due to tape wear is a problem that results in increased spacing loss of the readback signal. Efforts to minimize gap erosion in hard disk drive type ceramic tape heads usually involves making the gap materials more wear resistant or coating the head with wear resistant material. Another problem that can occur is accumulation of conductive debris and wear material in the recessed region that results in electrical shorting of the magnetoresistive (MR) transducer elements in the gap to other electrically conductive elements in the gap. Yet another problem is corrosion of giant magnetoresistive (GMR) or magnetic tunnel junction (MTJ) sensors when exposed directly to running tape.
The present invention addresses the need for a tape recording head that eliminates or reduces the harmful effects of accumulated conductive debris to improve reliability and component life and that insulates anisotropic magnetoresistive (AMR), GMR and MTJ sensors from electrical charge exchange with the tape.
A magnetic head, according to one embodiment, includes a rowbar substrate having a tape support surface and a gap surface at a substrate edge. A closure is positioned opposite the gap surface of the rowbar substrate, the closure forming a portion of the tape support surface. A recessed gap region is interposed between the gap surface of the rowbar substrate and the closure, the recessed gap region having a recessed gap profile that extends between the gap surface of the rowbar substrate and the closure, the recessed gap region having a transducer row with at least one magnetic sensor on the gap surface of the rowbar substrate. An insulation layer is positioned over the recessed gap profile of the recessed gap region.
For a fuller understanding of the nature and advantages of the present invention, as well as the preferred mode of use, reference should be made to the following detailed description read in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. In the following drawings, like reference numerals designate like or similar parts throughout the drawings:
Alternatively, ion milling, sputtering, chemical-mechanical lapping, grinding and sputtering processes may be used to intentionally recess the gap 112. Sputtering is less attractive since sputtering rates differ for different materials leading to selective etching of the gap components. Because of the small dimensions of the gap region and the desired recession , grinding would require a very high precision process which may be difficult to implement.
After the intentional recession of the gap 112 by conditioning with the chromium oxide tape is completed, the head is placed in a vacuum system where it is sputter cleaned in an argon-hydrogen plasma for less than 1 minute to remove residual debris and other contamination from the recessed gap profile 322. If selective pole tip etching is desired a longer sputter clean time may be used. After cleaning, an electrically insulating layer 324 having a thickness in the range of 4-20 nm is deposited on the tape support surface 108 and the recessed gap as shown in
Alternatively, after the intentional recession of the gap 112 by conditioning with the chromium oxide tape, the head may be used in a tape drive without deposition of the insulator layer 324. However, to obtain the full benefit of recession of the gap 112, deposition of the insulator layer provides additional protection from shorting of the MR transducer by accumulated conductive debris.
A novel feature of the present invention is providing a forced or intentional recession by a predetermined amount creating a gap profile 322 prior to the deposition of an electrical insulation layer 324. The electrical insulation layer in the gap 112 is less exposed to wear by the recording tape 120 for the duration of the head lifetime while avoiding the problem of excessive spacing of the recording tape from the read and write transducers. The insulation layer eliminates MR transducer resistance reduction and resistance fluctuations caused by accumulations of conductive materials from the magnetic recording tape which can result in tape drive field failures.
While the present invention has been particularly shown and described with reference to the preferred embodiments, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and detail may be made without departing from the spiryit, scope and teaching of the invention. Accordingly, the disclosed invention is to be considered merely as illustrative and limited only as specified in the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4130847 | Head et al. | Dec 1978 | A |
4407894 | Kadokura et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
5761790 | Carr et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5815910 | Park et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5905613 | Biskeborn et al. | May 1999 | A |
6122147 | Fahimi et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6267903 | Watanuki | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6309278 | Suzuki et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6324747 | Boutaghou | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6396670 | Murdock | May 2002 | B1 |
6404587 | Chaug et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6580586 | Biskeborn | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6678123 | Takayama et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6759081 | Huganen et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6785953 | Santini | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6789081 | Vanska | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6879470 | Johnson et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
7477482 | Biskeborn et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7751154 | Wu | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7898765 | Hachisuka | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8009386 | Hachisuka | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8917476 | Holmberg | Dec 2014 | B2 |
9053718 | Adrong | Jun 2015 | B1 |
9135931 | Biskeborn et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
10134429 | Biskeborn et al. | Nov 2018 | B2 |
20020078554 | Kobayashi | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020191349 | Hsu et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20040032696 | Johnson et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040161636 | Hujanen et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040169958 | Krounbi et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20060232883 | Biskeborn et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20080266711 | Nibarger et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080314736 | Biskeborn et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20110134569 | Allen | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20150364147 | Biskeborn et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/110,140, dated Dec. 26, 2007. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 11/110,140, dated Jul. 14, 2008. |
Restriction Requirement from U.S. Appl. No. 11/110,140, dated Sep. 21, 2007. |
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/197,002, dated Oct. 18, 2011. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/197,002, dated Feb. 29, 2012. |
Patent Board Decision on Appeal from U.S. Appl. No. 12/197,002, dated Feb. 20, 2015. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 12/197,002, dated May 4, 2015. |
Corrected Notice of Allowability from U.S. Appl. No. 12/197,002, dated Jun. 3, 2015. |
Biskeborn et al., U.S. Appl. No. 11/110,140, filed Apr. 19, 2005. |
Biskeborn et al., U.S. Appl. No. 12/197,002, filed Aug. 22, 2008. |
Examiner's Answer to Appeal Brief from U.S. Appl. No. 12/197,002, dated Oct. 3, 2012. |
Biskeborn et al., U.S. Appl. No. 14/835,644, filed Aug. 25, 2015. |
Restriction Requirement from U.S. Appl. No. 14/835,644, dated May 17, 2017. |
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/835,644, dated Sep. 8, 2017. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/835,644, dated Dec. 27, 2017. |
Ex Parte Quayle from U.S. Appl. No. 14/835,644, dated Feb. 26, 2018. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 14/835,644, dated Jul. 13, 2018. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190051318 A1 | Feb 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14835644 | Aug 2015 | US |
Child | 16154596 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12197002 | Aug 2008 | US |
Child | 14835644 | US | |
Parent | 11110140 | Apr 2005 | US |
Child | 12197002 | US |