1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a film element for absorbing tensile forces.
2. The Prior Art
Film elements are frequently used to transfer tensile forces in the direction of a longitudinal extent, e.g., as functional parts (in particular pressure-sensitive, i.e., self-stick) for carrying, connecting, sealing and/or covering objects. Examples from everyday life include adhesive tape and/or adhesive strips. Furthermore, a wide variety of loops, belts and hangers, shopping bags and/or shopping bags handles, load securing films (for example, over loaded pallets), sealing labels, signet labels and packaging films.
So-called hanger labels are used in the field of medicine in particular but also for pharmaceutical products. These hanger labels have a hanger-like hanging strap, which can be pulled out of the plane of the film of the remaining label, which is adhesively attached to a container, e.g., an infusion bottle. The container is suspended upside down by the hanging strap. The hanger-like hanging strap is then subjected to considerable tensile stresses, depending on the size and filling of the container.
Publications describing such hanger labels include German Patent DE 39 07 862 A1, German Utility Model DE 91 01 464 U1, European Patent EP 0 356 574 A2 and European Patent EP 0 632 422 A1, for example.
When a tensile stress acts on a film, microtears occur, starting in particular from minor defects in the material. At the end of tearing, locally elevated stresses occur, leading to propagation of the tear and ultimately to failure of the material, i.e., the film is torn all the way through.
Since the contours of hanger labels are usually produced by punching, it is possible for microtears to develop here starting from edge defects, which may result from poor punching results, e.g., due to worn a punch. These problems are even greater in rotary punching, which is considerably more productive than roller flat punching or planishing.
When the hanging strap of a hanger label is torn through, the container suspended by the hanger label falls down. In the case of an infusion bottle, this could have serious consequences for the patient being treated.
According to the state of the art, film parts which are acted upon by tension are designed with certain safety reserves by using thicker or more tear-resistant material, which is usually also much more expensive.
For example, various olefin films are used, which, although they have a greater tear propagation resistance and are thus less susceptible to damage, also have a greater elongation and a lower tensile strength, which is why very thick films (film thickness approximately 150–250 μm) must be used. Furthermore, multilayer film composites are also used. For example, a laminate of two layers of PET 75 μm and 50 μm thick will provide a greater security against damage than a single layer of PET with a thickness of 125 μm. Nevertheless, minor damage in critical regions of a hanger label, e.g., at the suspension point or at curved punched holes at the transition from a hanging strap to the glued regions of the label, may result in a significant loss of tensile strength.
Table 1 shows as an example the weakening of the hanger of a two-layer hanger label made of PET due to damage to the edge. This lists the tensile strength in newtons for the undamaged label and when there is slight damage to the edge of one of the layers.
As Table 1 clearly shows, a slight damage at the edge of one layer already means a considerable susceptibility to tearing with the associated reduction in tensile strength, while damage to the edge of both layers causes a reduction in tensile strength by several orders of magnitude.
Table 2 gives the tensile strength in newtons for the damaged and undamaged condition of 25-:m-wide single-layer and two-layer film strips made of different materials. In the case of materials “A” and “B,” these are plastic materials having a lower stretchability and a greater tensile strength, whereas materials “C” and “D” are plastic materials having a greater stretchability and lower tensile strength. The :m values give the particular thickness of the film and/or the film layers.
It is easy to see from Table 2 that with traditional film strips which are acted upon by a tensile stress, a great reduction in tensile strength is evidently unavoidable whenever there is damage to the edge.
In view of the problems described here, the object of the present invention is to create a film element for accommodating tensile forces which will have an increased security against tearing due to the development of cracks and/or tears. In particular it is also the object of the present invention to create a hanger label which can be used as a container hanging device and will have increased safety reserves in particular in the case of damage. On the other hand, the cost of materials is to be reduced and/or less expensive materials are to be used, while maintaining the same or greater security against tearing in comparison with traditional technical implementations.
According to one aspect of the present invention, this object is achieved by a film element for absorbing tensile forces, wherein the film element (1) has at least one zone of weakening (6a, 6b, 9a, 9b, 13, 15a, 15b, 16) which extends in the direction of action of the tensile forces (F) and reduces local stress peaks under load, this zone being provided in at least one region (A, B, C, D) which is at risk of tearing under load, said zone of weakening being bordered on both sides by unweakened material (7, 10a, 10b, 12a, 12b) in at least one direction across the direction of action of the tensile forces (F).
According to this invention, the load absorbing capacity and/or tear strength of film elements that absorb tensile forces, in particular hanger-like hanging straps is increased due to local weakening points, e.g., longitudinal slots in a manner that is completely surprising for those skilled in the art. The weakened zones, i.e., areas that are weakened locally due to longitudinal slots or the like, act as force distribution elements which distribute the forces along the weakened area into undamaged regions of material and/or are able to distribute the forces over a larger force-absorbing surface area. The reduces the maximum load occurring locally. In the case of tearing, the crack or tear will propagate only up to the weakened zone, where stress peaks are dissipated because the forces acting are split to a certain extent, thus reducing the load on individual segments of material. As a result, the force required for propagation of tearing and the tensile strength of the film material are increased.
The present invention may be used in particular to provide film elements with a clearly defined tear stop, i.e., a predetermined end of tearing. In other words, this invention also includes films which may tear only up to a certain point. Thus for example film-like airbag covers which tear only in a defined manner are also possible.
On the basis of the respective drawings, examples of preferred exemplary embodiments of the present invention will now be explained in greater detail. The diagrams depicted here are not drawn to scale and in particular are to be interpreted as being merely schematic. In particular in the case of sectional diagrams, the layer thicknesses are greatly enlarged for reasons of simplicity and in some cases gaps between adjacent layers have been shown in the manner of an exploded diagram.
a shows the basic shape of a hanger label with a hanging strap according to the state of the art. Inventive weakening zones are not emphasized visually here.
b shows in a perspective view a hanger label of the basic shape depicted in
c shows in a perspective view an enlarged detail of the region A, which is outlined with a dashed line in
a shows a hanger label of the basic shape depicted in
b shows a multilayer hanger label of the basic shape depicted in
c shows a hanger label of the basic shape depicted in
a shows the basic shape based on the state of the art for an inventive hanger label 1 with a punched hanging strap 2, whereby the inventive weakened zones are not emphasized visually here. The end regions 4a, 4b of the punched shape 5 may have different designs; in addition to the variant depicted here, advantageous shapes which are known from the state of the art, for example, a spiral shape, may also be provided.
a shows a hanger label designed according to the basic design illustrated in
b and 6 show a locally interrupted adhesive layer 11 for separation of an upper film layer 12a from a lower film layer 12b. The adhesive-free recesses 15a, 15b here constitute zones of weakening in the sense of the present invention. As explained in conjunction with
c, 7 and 8 show a locally weakened adhesive layer 11 for separation of an upper film layer 12a from a lower film layer 12b. The zones of weakening according to this invention, the position of which is indicated by hatching in
It is thus self-evident that the embodiments of the weakened zones which are depicted here on the basis of examples may also be combined with one another.
The efficacy of the inventive measures for increasing the tensile strength is illustrated on the basis of the bar graph in
In the experiment described here, the hangers were damaged by a cut in the helical area. The zones of weakening according to this invention in the form of a slot here increase the tensile strength in an empirically reproducible manner and thus increase product safety of the hanger label with a material construction that is otherwise the same. In the event of an unwanted damage in practice, which cannot be ruled out, e.g., due to a worn punch, the measure according to this invention of introducing a zone of weakening is particularly advantageous.
The tearing properties may also be varied through appropriate adaptation of the following parameters: material construction, material thicknesses, types of material, degree of stretching, pigmentation, surface treatment. Thus, in particular for laminates of two or more layers, the following materials may be used in particular: polyethylene terephthalate (for the top and/or bottom layer(s)), polyolefins (for the top and/or bottom layer(s)), polyamides (for the top and/or bottom layer(s)), polypropylene (for the top layer), oriented polypropylene (for the top and/or bottom layer(s)), polybutylene terephthalate (for the top layer), nonwovens (for the top layer), mesh structures.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
103 07 250 | Feb 2003 | DE | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6635334 | Jackson et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6713159 | Blenke et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
20020056514 | Grosskopf et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20040219331 | Moosheimer et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
39 07 862 | Sep 1990 | DE |
91 01 464.6 | Jun 1991 | DE |
93 14 393.1 | Feb 1994 | DE |
0 356 574 | Mar 1990 | EP |
0 632 422 | Jan 1995 | EP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040209043 A1 | Oct 2004 | US |