This invention relates to a technique for simulating film grain in an image.
Motion picture films comprise silver-halide crystals dispersed in an emulsion, coated in thin layers on a film base. The exposure and development of these crystals form the photographic image consisting of discrete tiny particles of silver. In color negatives, the silver undergoes chemical removal after development and tiny blobs of dye occur on the sites where the silver crystals form. These small specks of dye are commonly called ‘grain’ in color film. Grain appears randomly distributed on the resulting image because of the random formation of silver crystals on the original emulsion. Within a uniformly exposed area, some crystals develop after exposure while others do not.
Grain varies in size and shape. The faster the film, the larger the clumps of silver formed and blobs of dye generated, and the more they tend to group together in random patterns. The grain pattern is typically known as ‘granularity’. The naked eye cannot distinguish individual grains, which vary from 0.0002 mm to about 0.002 mm. Instead, the eye resolves groups of grains, referred to as blobs. A viewer identifies these groups of blobs as film grain. As the image resolution becomes larger, the perception of the film grain becomes higher. Film grain becomes clearly noticeable on cinema and high-definition images, whereas film grain progressively loses importance in SDTV and becomes imperceptible in smaller formats.
Motion picture film typically contains image-dependent noise resulting either from the physical process of exposure and development of the photographic film or from the subsequent editing of the images. The photographic film possesses a characteristic quasi-random pattern, or texture, resulting from physical granularity of the photographic emulsion. Alternatively, a similar pattern can be simulated over computed-generated images in order to blend them with photographic film. In both cases, this image-dependent noise is referred to as grain. Quite often, moderate grain texture presents a desirable feature in motion pictures. In some instances, the film grain provides visual cues that facilitate the correct perception of two-dimensional pictures. Film grain is often varied within a single film to provide various clues as to time reference, point of view, etc. Many other technical and artistic uses exist for controlling grain texture in the motion picture industry. Therefore, preserving the grainy appearance of images throughout image processing and delivery chain has become a requirement in the motion picture industry.
Several commercially available products have the capability of simulating film grain, often for blending a computer-generated object into a natural scene. Cineon® from Eastman Kodak Co, Rochester N.Y., one of the first digital film applications to implement grain simulation, produces very realistic results for many grain types. However, the Cineon® application does not yield good performance for many high-speed films because of the noticeable diagonal stripes the application produces for high grain size settings. Further, the Cineon® application fails to simulate grain with adequate fidelity when images are subject to previous processing, for example, such as when the images are copied or digitally processed.
Another commercial product that simulates film grain is Grain Surgery™ from Visual Infinity Inc., which is used as a plug-in of Adobe® After Effects®. The Grain Surgery™ product appears to generate synthetic grain by filtering a set of random numbers. This approach suffers from disadvantage of a high computational complexity.
None of these past schemes solves the problem of restoring film grain in compressed video. Film grain constitutes a high frequency quasi-random phenomenon that typically cannot undergo compression using conventional spatial and temporal methods that take advantage of redundancies in the video sequences. Attempts to process film-originated images using MPEG-2 or ITU-T/ISO H.264 compression techniques usually result either in an unacceptably low degree of compression or complete loss of the grain texture.
Thus, there exists a need for a technique simulating film grain, especially a technique that affords relatively low complexity.
Briefly, in accordance with the present principles, there is provided a method for simulating a block of film grain. The method begins by obtaining a pre-computed block of transformed coefficients. The block of pre-computed block of transformed coefficients then undergoes filtering responsive to a frequency range that characterize a desired pattern of the film grain. (In practice, the frequency range lies within a set of cut frequencies fHL, fVL, fHH and fVH of a filter, in two dimensions, that characterizes a desired film grain pattern.) Thereafter, the filtered set of coefficients undergoes an inverse transform to yield the film grain pattern.
To understand the technique of the present principles for simulating film grain using a set of pre-computed transformed coefficients, a brief overview of film grain simulation will prove helpful.
The overall management of film grain requires the transmitter 10 (i.e., the encoder) provide information with respect to the film grain in the incoming video. In other words, the transmitter 10 “models” the film grain. Further the receiver 11 (i.e., decoder) simulates the film grain according to the film grain information received from the transmitter 10. The transmitter 10 enhances the quality of the compressed video by enabling the receiver 11 to simulate film grain in the video signal when difficulty exists in retaining the film grain during the video coding process.
In the illustrated embodiment of
A film grain modeler 16 accepts the input video stream, as well as the output signal of the film grain remover 14 (when present). Using such input information, the film grain modeler 16 establishes the film grain in the incoming video signal. In its simplest form, the film grain modeler 16 could comprise a look up table containing film grain models for different film stocks. Information in the incoming video signal would specify the particular film stock originally used to record the image prior to conversion into a video signal, thus allowing the film grain modeler 16 to select the appropriate film grain model for such film stock. Alternatively, the film grain modeler 16 could comprise a processor or dedicated logic circuit that would execute one or more algorithms to sample the incoming video and determine the film grain pattern that is present.
The receiver 11 typically includes a video decoder 18 that serves to decode the compressed video stream received from the transmitter 10. The structure of the decoder 18 will depend on the type of compression performed by the encoder 12 within the transmitter 10. Thus, for example, the use within the transmitter 10 of an encoder 12 that employs the ITU-T Rec. H.264|ISO/IEC 14496-10 video compression standard to compress outgoing video will dictate the need for an H.264-compliant decoder 18. Within the receiver 11, a film grain simulator 20 receives the film grain information from the film grain model 16. The film grain simulator 20 can take the form of a programmed processor, or dedicated logic circuit having the capability of simulating film grain for combination via a combiner 22 with the decoded video stream.
Film grain simulation aims to synthesize film grain samples that simulate the look of the original film content. As described, film grain modeling occurs at the transmitter 10 of
Film grain simulation in accordance with the present principles makes use of a pre-computed set of transformed coefficients. In other words, the simulation process begins with a block, typically, although not necessarily, of N×N size, whose coefficients have been transformed in advance of simulation, typically, but not necessarily, using a Discrete Cosine Transformation. Other transformations are possible. Bit-accurate implementation of the simulation method of the present principles occurs by performing an integer inverse transform on the block of pre-computed values.
The film grain simulation method of the present principles presents an interesting tradeoff between complexity and memory requirements when compared to previously disclosed methods. On the one hand, the present method reduces the complexity of the transform-based approaches, by avoiding computation of the direct transform. On the other hand, the method reduces the memory requirements of database-based approaches by storing transformed coefficients instead of film grain patterns. The proposed method could be applied to HD DVD systems, BD ROM systems as well as satellite broadcasting just to cite a few examples.
Following step 202, step 204 occurs, initiating entry into a loop that repeats for all possible film grain sizes and shapes. Upon entry into the loop, the transformed coefficients undergo frequency filtering during step 205 using a predefined set of cut frequencies fHL, fVL, fHH and fVH that represent cut-off frequencies (in two dimensions) of a filter that characterizes the desired film grain pattern. Next step 206 occurs during which the frequency filtered block of transformed coefficients undergoes an inverse transformation, typically, although not necessarily, an Inverse Discrete Cosine Transformation (IDCT), to yield a block of film grain. Under some circumstances, scaling of the inversely transformed block of coefficients following or preceding step 206 will prove useful.
Thereafter, the block of film grain that results from the inverse transformation performed during step 206 (or after scaling if such scaling occurs) undergoes storage in a database 209 during step 208. The loop initiated during step 204 undergoes repeating (i.e., steps 205 and 206 are repeated) for all possible film grain sizes and shapes, whereupon loop execution ends during step 210, after which the method ends during step 212. As can be appreciated from the foregoing description, the single image of Gaussian random values read from the memory 203 during step 202 of
Following step 302, step 305 occurs and the N×N image of DCT coefficients read from the memory 303 undergoes frequency filtering using a predefined set of cut frequencies fHL, fVL, fHH and fVH that represent cut-off frequencies (in two dimensions) of a filter that characterizes the desired film grain pattern. Next step 306 occurs during which the frequency filtered block of transformed coefficients undergoes an inverse transformation, typically, although not necessarily, an Inverse Discrete Cosine Transformation (IDCT), to yield a block of film grain. Under some circumstances, scaling of the inversely transformed block of coefficients following step 306 will prove useful.
Thereafter, step 308 occurs and the block of film grain that results from the inverse transformation performed (and scaling if performed) undergoes storage in a database 309 during step 308.
The loop initiated during step 301 undergoes repeating (i.e., steps 302-308 are repeated) for all possible film grain sizes and shapes, whereupon loop execution ends during step 310, after which the method ends during step 312. Unlike the method of
The foregoing describes a technique for simulating film grain using pre-computed transformed coefficients, thereby reducing complexity.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/667,581, filed May 10, 2007. This application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No 60/630,640, filed Nov. 23, 2004, the teachings of which are incorporated herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4897775 | Kaassens | Jan 1990 | A |
4935816 | Faber | Jun 1990 | A |
4998167 | Jaqua | Mar 1991 | A |
5028280 | Ihara et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5140414 | Mowry | Aug 1992 | A |
5216556 | Steinberg et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5262248 | Ihara et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5285402 | Keith | Feb 1994 | A |
5335013 | Faber | Aug 1994 | A |
5374954 | Mowry | Dec 1994 | A |
5406326 | Mowry | Apr 1995 | A |
5453840 | Parker et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5457491 | Mowry | Oct 1995 | A |
5461596 | Barrett | Oct 1995 | A |
5471572 | Buchner et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5475425 | Przyborski et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5526446 | Adelson et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5550815 | Cloonan et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5629769 | Cookingham et al. | May 1997 | A |
5636295 | Kim | Jun 1997 | A |
5641596 | Gray et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5659332 | Rybczynski | Aug 1997 | A |
5687011 | Mowry | Nov 1997 | A |
5706361 | Kent et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5709972 | Cookingham et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5715008 | Sekiguchi et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5742892 | Chaddha | Apr 1998 | A |
5767860 | Zimmer et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5805782 | Foran | Sep 1998 | A |
5817447 | Yip | Oct 1998 | A |
5831673 | Przyborski et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5832172 | Jeon | Nov 1998 | A |
5845017 | Keyes | Dec 1998 | A |
5917609 | Breeuwer et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
6067125 | May | May 2000 | A |
6134200 | Timmermans | Oct 2000 | A |
6216838 | Bacher et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6219838 | Cherichetti et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6233647 | Bentz et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6266817 | Chaddha | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6269180 | Sevigny | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6285711 | Ratakonda et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6327304 | Miller et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6327391 | Ohnishi et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6370192 | Pearlstein et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6370197 | Pearlstein | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6373992 | Nagao | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6441918 | Hori | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6459699 | Kimura et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6496221 | Wolf et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6559849 | Anderson et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6587509 | Suzuki et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6650327 | Airey et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6665369 | Ukita | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6667815 | Nagao | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6724942 | Arai | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6728317 | Demos | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6744928 | Juri et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6839152 | Fan et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6868190 | Morton | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6963668 | Engeldrum et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6987586 | Bogdanowicz | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6990251 | Edgar | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6990252 | Shekter | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6995793 | Albadawi et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7065255 | Chen et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7092016 | Morton et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7106907 | Lin et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7149247 | Sullivan | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7239359 | Matsuyama | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7245783 | Fielding | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7362911 | Frank | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7596239 | Winger et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7630005 | Takei | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7653132 | Dang | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7664337 | Balram et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7680356 | Boyce et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7738722 | Gomila et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7742655 | Gomila et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7856055 | Zhou et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7889939 | Llach et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7958532 | Paul et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
20010056568 | Hirotsu et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020003903 | Engeldrum et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020016103 | Behnke | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020034337 | Shekter | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020106103 | Jones et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020133764 | Wang | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020154140 | Tazaki | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020171649 | Fogg | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030011615 | Tidwell | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030031128 | Kim et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030043922 | Kalker et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030063778 | Rowe et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030068097 | Wilson et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030086623 | Berkner et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030101453 | Matsuyama et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030206231 | Chen et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030206662 | Avinash et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030218610 | Mech et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040006575 | Visharam et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040013308 | Jeon et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040071363 | Kouri et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040073926 | Nakamura et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040101059 | Joch et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040208389 | Lin | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040264795 | Fielding | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20060007460 | Bogdanowicz et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060013320 | Oguz et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060072660 | Jia et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060082649 | Gomila et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060083316 | Cooper et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060083426 | Cooper et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060083429 | Joly | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060104366 | Huang et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060133686 | Gomila et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060182183 | Winger | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060183275 | Schoner et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060256853 | Schlockermann et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060256871 | Boyce et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060291557 | Tourapis | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070002947 | Lu et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070030996 | Winger et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070036452 | Llach et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070047658 | Tourapis et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070058866 | Boyce et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070058878 | Gomila et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070070241 | Boyce et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070104380 | Gomila et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070117291 | Cooper et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070140588 | Balram et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070297515 | Gomila et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080025781 | Koyama | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080152250 | Gomila et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080252781 | De Waele et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20100104025 | Rose et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
364285 | Oct 1989 | EP |
363715 | Apr 1990 | EP |
575006 | Jun 1993 | EP |
0622000 | Nov 1994 | EP |
0756281 | Jan 1997 | EP |
1175091 | Jan 2002 | EP |
1215624 | Jun 2002 | EP |
800313 | Nov 2003 | EP |
1511320 | Mar 2005 | EP |
1812940 | Oct 2005 | EP |
1611740 | Jan 2006 | EP |
1661089 | May 2006 | EP |
1690423 | Aug 2006 | EP |
2312124 | Oct 1997 | GB |
1156069 | Jun 1989 | JP |
3187661 | Aug 1991 | JP |
497681 | Mar 1992 | JP |
4097681 | Mar 1992 | JP |
04349458 | Dec 1992 | JP |
5252459 | Sep 1993 | JP |
879765 | Mar 1996 | JP |
8079765 | Mar 1996 | JP |
8149466 | Jun 1996 | JP |
9062718 | Mar 1997 | JP |
9139940 | May 1997 | JP |
9247681 | Sep 1997 | JP |
9275529 | Oct 1997 | JP |
10509297 | Sep 1998 | JP |
200041242 | Feb 2000 | JP |
2001357090 | Dec 2001 | JP |
2001357095 | Dec 2001 | JP |
2002359845 | Dec 2002 | JP |
2002374541 | Dec 2002 | JP |
200324326 | Jan 2003 | JP |
2003163853 | Jun 2003 | JP |
2003179923 | Jun 2003 | JP |
2004120057 | Apr 2004 | JP |
2004135169 | Apr 2004 | JP |
2007507172 | Mar 2007 | JP |
2007529945 | Oct 2007 | JP |
2073913 | Feb 1997 | RU |
2088962 | Aug 1997 | RU |
2139637 | Oct 1999 | RU |
WO8907799 | Aug 1989 | WO |
WO9206409 | Apr 1992 | WO |
WO9314591 | Jul 1993 | WO |
WO9404960 | Mar 1994 | WO |
WO9520292 | Jul 1995 | WO |
WO9710676 | Mar 1997 | WO |
WO9722204 | Jun 1997 | WO |
WO9729632 | Aug 1997 | WO |
WO0018109 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO0146992 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO0174064 | Oct 2001 | WO |
WO0177871 | Oct 2001 | WO |
WO0233958 | Apr 2002 | WO |
WO0251160 | Jun 2002 | WO |
WO03005731 | Jan 2003 | WO |
WO2004095829 | Nov 2004 | WO |
WO2004104931 | Dec 2004 | WO |
WO2004105250 | Dec 2004 | WO |
WO2005027045 | Mar 2005 | WO |
WO2005032143 | Apr 2005 | WO |
WO2005034518 | Apr 2005 | WO |
WO2005039188 | Apr 2005 | WO |
WO2005039189 | Apr 2005 | WO |
WO2006022705 | Mar 2006 | WO |
WO2006057703 | Jun 2006 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Wiegand et al: “Overview of the H.264/AVC Video Coding Standard”; IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 13, No. 7, Jul. 2003. |
Bjontegaard: “Addition of Comfort Noise as Post Processing”, ITU-Telecommunications Standardizations Sector, 2nd Meeting, Sunriver: Oregon, Sep. 8-11, 1997. |
Byun et al: “Power Efficient MPEG-4 Decoder Architecture Featuring Low-complexity Error Resilience”; Proceedings IEEE Asia-Pac Conference 2002, pp. 225-228. |
Conklin et al: “Filter for Inloop Deblocking”; Joint Video Team; 5th Meeting, Fairfax, Virginia; May 6-10, 2002. |
McMahon et al: “High Quality SD & HD AVC Test Results”; Joint Video Team, 5th Meeting, Geneva, Switzerland, Oct. 9-17, 2002. |
Naderi et al: “Estimation of Images Degraded by Film-Grain Noise”; Abstract. Applied Optics, vol. 17, Issue 8, pp. 1228-1237. 1978. |
Pirsch et al: “VLSI Architectures for Video Compression”; IEEE Symposium on Signals, Systems and Electronics; Feb. 1995, vol. 83, Issue 2, pp. 220-246. |
Schlockerman et al: “Film Grain Coding in H.264/AVC”; Joint Video Team; 9th Meeting, San Diego, California, Sep. 2-5, 2003. |
Sullivan et al: “The H.264/AVC Advanced Video Coding Standard: Overview & Introduction to the Fidelity Range Extensions”: Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 5558, Bellingham, Washington, 2004. |
List, et al., Adaptive Deblocking Filter, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 13, No. 7, Jul. 2003. |
Campisi et al., Signal-Dependent Film Grain Noise Generation Using Homomorphic Adaptive Filtering, IEE Proc.-Vis. Image Signal Process, vol. 147, No. 3, Jun. 2000. |
Gomila, et al., SEI Message for Film Gain Encoding, Joint Video Team (JVT) of ISO/IEC MPEG & ITU-T VCEG (ISO/IEC JTC1/SV29/WG11 and ITU-T SG16 Q.6), 8th meeting: Geneva, CH, May 23-27, 2003. |
Gomila, SEI Message for Film Grain Encoding: Syntax and Results, Joint Video Team (JVT) of ISO/IEC MPEG & ITU-T VCEG (ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11 and ITU-T SG16 Q.6) 7th Meeting: San Diego, California, USA, Sep. 2-5, 2003. |
Wenger et al., “RTP Payload Format for H.264 Video”, IETF Standard-Working-Draft, Internet Engineering Task Force, IETF, vol. AVT, No. 11, Aug. 2004, CH. |
Tourapis et al., “Quantization Offset Matrices for Fidelity Range Extensions”, JVT of ISO/IEC MPEG&ITU-T VCEG, Document: JVT-L032, 12th Meeting: Redmond, Washington, Jul. 19-23, 2004. |
Peng et al., “Adaptive Frequency Weighting for Fine-Granualarity-Scalability”, Visual Communications and Image Processing 2002, Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 4671, 2002. |
Oktem et al., “Transform Domain Algorithm for Reducing Effect of Film-Grain Noise in Image Compression”, Electronics Letters, vol. 35, No. 21, Oct. 14, 1999. |
Al-Shaykh et al., “Restoration of Lossy Compressed Noisy Images”, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 3, No. 10, Oct. 1999. |
Shahnaz et al., “Image Compression in Signal-Dependent Noise”, Applied Optics, vol. 38, No. 26, Sep. 10, 1999. |
Zhao et al., Constant Quality Rate Control for Streaming MPEG-4 FGS Video, IEEE, 2002. |
Al-Shaykh et al., “Lossy Compression of Noisy Images”, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 7, No. 12, Dec. 1998. |
Brightwell et al., “Automated Correction of Film Unsteadiness, Dirt and Grain”, International Broadcasting Convention, Sep. 16-20, 1994. |
Fischer et al., “Image Sharpening Using Permutation Weighted Medians”, National Science Foundation, Mar. 12, 2018. |
Yan et al., “Signal-Dependent Film Grain Noise Removal and Generation Based on Higher-Order Statistics”, Ontario, Canada, IEEE, 1997. |
Chavel et al., “Film Grain Noise in Partially Coherent Imaging”, Optical Engineering, vol. 19, No. 3, May/Jun. 1980. |
McLean et al., “Telecine Noise Reduction”, The Institution of Electrical Engineers, London, UK, Jan. 16, 2001, pp. 1-6. |
Al-Shaykh et al, “Lossy Compression of Images Corrupted by Film Grain Noise”, IEEE, Atlanta, GA, 1996. |
Prades-Nebot, “Rate control for Fully Fine-Grained Scalable Video Coders”, Visual Communications and Image Processing 2002, Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 4671, 2002. |
Van Der Schaar, “Fine-Granualarity-Scalability for Wireless Video and Scalable Storage”, Visual Communications and Image Processing 2002, Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 4671, 2002. |
Yan et al., “Efficient Video Coding with Hybrid Spatial and Fine-Grain SNR Scalabilities”, Visual Communications and Image Processing 2002, Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 4671, 2002. |
Yan et al., “Film Grain Noise Removal and Generation for Color Images”, Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, May 15, 1998. |
Zhang et al., “Constant Quality Constrained Rate Allocation for FGS Video Coded Bitstreams”, Visual Communications and Image Processing 2002, Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 4671, 2002. |
Yoshida, “Go With the Grain, Film R&D Chief Urges, for Art's Sake”, EE Times, Feb. 7, 2005. |
Chen, “Transporting Compresssed Digital Video, Chapter 5: Time Stamping for Decoding and Presentation”, Dordrecht, London, 2002, pp. 133-136. |
Puri et al., “Video Coding Using the H.264/MPEG-4 AVC Compression Standard”, Signal Processing: Image Communication 19, 2004, pp. 793-849. |
Gomila et al., “Film Grain Modeling vs. Encoding”, JVT of ISO/IEC MPEG & ITU-T VCEG, Document: JVT-K036, 11th Meeting: Munich, DE, Mar. 15-19, 2004. |
Gomila et al., “Simplification of th eJVT deblocking filter” Joint Video Team (JVT) of ISO/IEC MPEG & ITU-T VCEG (ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11 and ITU-T SG16 Q.6)3rd Meeting: Fairfax, Virginia, USA, May 6-10, 2002. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160021399 A1 | Jan 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11667581 | May 2007 | US |
Child | 14870484 | US |