Film grain simulation method

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8447127
  • Patent Number
    8,447,127
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, October 20, 2009
    15 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, May 21, 2013
    11 years ago
Abstract
Briefly, in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present principles, simulation of a block of film grain for addition to a block of an image occurs by first establishing at least one image parameter in accordance with at least one attribute of the block. Thereafter, a block of film grain is established in accordance with the image parameter. Deblocking filtering can be applied to the film grain block.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

This invention relates to a technique for simulating film grain in an image.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Motion picture films comprise silver-halide crystals dispersed in an emulsion, coated in thin layers on a film base. The exposure and development of these crystals form the photographic image consisting of discrete tiny particles of silver. In color negatives, the silver undergoes chemical removal after development and tiny blobs of dye occur on the sites where the silver crystals form. These small specks of dye are commonly called ‘grain’ in color film. Grain appears randomly distributed on the resulting image because of the random formation of silver crystals on the original emulsion. Within a uniformly exposed area, some crystals develop after exposure while others do not.


Grain varies in sizes and shapes. The faster the film, the larger the clumps of silver formed and blobs of dye generated, and the more they tend to group together in random patterns. The grain pattern is typically known as ‘granularity’. The naked eye cannot distinguish individual grains, which vary from 0.0002 mm to about 0.002 mm. Instead, the eye resolves groups of grains, referred to as blobs. A viewer identifies these groups of blobs as film grain. As the image resolution becomes larger, the perception of the film grain becomes higher. Film grain becomes clearly noticeable on cinema and high-definition images, whereas film grain progressively loses importance in SDTV and becomes imperceptible in smaller formats.


Motion picture film typically contains image-dependent noise resulting either from the physical process of exposure and development of the photographic film or from the subsequent editing of the images. The photographic film possesses a characteristic quasi-random pattern, or texture, resulting from physical granularity of the photographic emulsion. Alternatively, a similar pattern can be simulated over computed-generated images in order to blend them with photographic film. In both cases, this image-dependent noise is referred to as grain. Quite often, moderate grain texture presents a desirable feature in motion pictures. In some instances, the film grain provides visual cues that facilitate the correct perception of two-dimensional pictures. Film grain is often varied within a single film to provide various clues as to time reference, point of view, etc. Many other technical and artistic uses exist for controlling grain texture in the motion picture industry. Therefore, preserving the grainy appearance of images throughout image processing and delivery chain has become a requirement in the motion picture industry.


Several commercially available products have the capability of simulating film grain, often for blending a computer-generated object into a natural scene. Cineon® from Eastman Kodak Co, Rochester N.Y., one of the first digital film applications to implement grain simulation, produces very realistic results for many grain types. However, the Cineon® application does not yield good performance for many high-speed films because of the noticeable diagonal stripes the application produces for high grain size settings. Further, the Cineon® application fails to simulate grain with adequate fidelity when images are subject to previous processing, for example, such as when the images are copied or digitally processed.


Another commercial product that simulates film grain is Grain Surgery™ from Visual Infinity Inc., which is used as a plug-in of Adobe® After Effects®. The Grain Surgery™ product appears to generate synthetic grain by filtering a set of random numbers. This approach suffers from disadvantage of a high computational complexity.


None of these past schemes solves the problem of restoring film grain in compressed video. Film grain constitutes a high frequency quasi-random phenomenon that typically cannot undergo compression using conventional spatial and temporal methods that take advantage of redundancies in the video sequences. Attempts to process film-originated images using MPEG-2 or ITU-T Rec. H.264|ISO/IEC 14496-10 compression techniques usually either result in an unacceptably low degree of compression or complete loss of the grain texture.


Thus, there exists a need for a technique simulating film grain, especially a technique that affords relatively low complexity.


BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Briefly, in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present principles, simulation of a block of film grain for addition to a macroblock of an image occurs by first establishing at least one image parameter at least in part in accordance with at least one attribute of the macroblock. Thereafter, a block of film grain is established in accordance with the image parameter.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 depicts a block schematic diagram of the combination of a transmitter and receiver in a film grain processing chain useful for practicing the technique of the present principles;



FIG. 2 depicts a block schematic diagram of a system for simulating film grain in accordance with the present principles;



FIG. 3 depicts a block diagram of a shift register for generating a primitive polynomial modulo 2 for simulating film grain in accordance with the method of FIG. 2 and



FIG. 4 depicts a pixel grid showing the use of random numbers in generating film grain in accordance with the method of FIG. 2.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

To understand the technique of the present principles for simulating a bit-accurate film grain pattern comprised of individual film grain blocks, a brief overview of film grain simulation will prove helpful. FIG. 1 depicts a block schematic diagram of a transmitter 10, which receives an input video signal and, in turn, generates a compressed video stream at its output. In addition, the transmitter 10 also generates information indicative of the film grain (if any) present in the sample. In practice, the transmitter 10 could comprises part of a head-end array of a cable television system, or other such system that distributes compressed video to one or more downstream receivers 11, only one of which is shown in FIG. 1. The transmitter 10 could also take the form of encoder that presents media like DVDs. The receiver 11 decodes the coded video stream and simulates film grain in accordance with the film grain information and decoded video, both received from the transmitter 10 or directly from the media itself in the case of a DVD or the like, to yield an output video stream that has simulated film grain. The receiver 11 can take the form of a set-top box or other such mechanism that serves to decode compressed video and simulate film grain in that video.


The overall management of film grain requires the transmitter 10 (i.e., the encoder) provide information with respect to the film grain in the incoming video. In other words, the transmitter 10 “models” the film grain. Further the receiver 11 (i.e., decoder) simulates the film grain according to the film grain information received from the transmitter 10. The transmitter 10 enhances the quality of the compressed video by enabling the receiver 11 to simulate film grain in the video signal when difficulty exists in retaining the film grain during the video coding process.


In the illustrated embodiment of FIG. 1, the transmitter 10 includes a video encoder 12 which encodes the video stream using any of the well known video compression techniques such as the ITU-T Rec. H.264|ISO/IEC 14496-10 video compression standard. Optionally, a film grain remover 14, in the form of a filter or the like depicted in dashed lines in FIG. 1, could exist upstream of the encoder 12 to remove any film grain in the incoming video stream prior to encoding. To the extent that the incoming video contains no film grain, no need would exist for the film grain remover 14.


A film grain modeler 16 accepts the input video stream, as well as the output signal of the film grain remover 14 (when present). Using such input information, the film grain modeler 16 establishes the film grain in the incoming video signal. In its simplest form, the film grain modeler 16 could comprise a look up table containing film grain models for different film stocks. Information in the incoming video signal would specify the particular film stock originally used to record the image prior to conversion into a video signal, thus allowing the film grain modeler 16 to select the appropriate film grain model for such film stock. Alternatively, the film grain modeler 16 could comprise a processor or dedicated logic circuit that would execute one or more algorithms to sample the incoming video and determine the film grain pattern that is present.


The receiver 11 typically includes a video decoder 18 that serves to decode the compressed video stream received from the transmitter 10. The structure of the decoder 18 will depend on the type of compression performed by the encoder 12 within the transmitter 10. Thus, for example, the use within the transmitter 10 of an encoder 12 that employs the ITU-T Rec. H.264|ISO/IEC 14496-10 video compression standard to compress outgoing video will dictate the need for an H.264-compliant decoder 18. Within the receiver 11, a film grain simulator 20 receives the film grain information from the film grain modeler 16. The film grain simulator 20 can take the form of a programmed processor, or dedicated logic circuit having the capability of simulating film grain for combination via a combiner 22 with the decoded video stream.


Film grain simulation aims to synthesize film grain samples that simulate the look of the original film content. As described, film grain modeling occurs at the transmitter 10 of FIG. 1, whereas film grain simulation occurs at the receiver 11. In particular, film grain simulation occurs in the receiver 11 along with the decoding the incoming video stream from the transmitter 10 upstream of the output of the decoded video stream. Note that the decoding process that occurs in the receiver 11 makes no use of images with added film grain. Rather, film grain simulation constitutes a post-processing method for synthesizing simulated film grain in the decoded images for display. For that reason, the ITU-T Rec. H.264|ISO/IEC 14496-10 video compression standard contains no specifications regarding the film grain simulation process. However, film grain simulation requires information concerning the grain pattern in the incoming video signal, which information typically undergoes transmission in a Supplemental Enhancement Information (SEI) message when using the ITU-T Rec. H.264|ISO/IEC 14496-10 video compression standard as specified by the Amendment 1 (Fidelity Range Extensions) of that compression standard.


The film grain simulation technique of the present principles enables bit-accurate film grain simulation and has applications to consumer products, such as HD DVD players for example. Other potential applications could include set top boxes, television sets, and even recording devices such as camcorders and the like. Film grain simulation occurs after decoding the video bit-stream and prior to pixel display. The film grain simulation process requires the decoding of film grain supplemental information transmitted in the SEI message. Specifications affecting the film grain SEI message ensure the technology will meet the requirements of high definition systems in terms of quality and complexity.


The value of the parameters conveyed in an ITU-T Rec. H.264|ISO/IEC 14496-10 film grain characteristics SEI message follow these constraints:


The parameter model_id specifies the simulation model. It shall be 0, which identifies the film grain simulation model as frequency filtering.


The parameter separate_colour_description_present_flag specifies whether the color space in which the film grain parameters are estimated is different from the color space in which the video sequence has been encoded. This parameter equals 0, which indicates that the color space for film grain simulation is the same than for encoding.


The parameter blending_mode_id specifies the blending mode used to blend the simulated film grain with the decoded images. This parameter equals 0, which corresponds to the additive blending mode.


The parameter log2_scale_factor specifies the logarithmic scale factor used to represent the film grain parameters in the SEI message. This parameter lies in the range [2, 7] to ensure the film grain simulation can occur using 16-bit arithmetic.


The parameters intensity_interval_lower_bound[j][i] and intensity_interval_upper_bound[j][i] specify the limits of the intensity interval i of color component j for which film grain parameters have been modeled. For all j and i, intensity_interval_lower_bound[j][i+1], this parameter remains greater than intensity_interval_upper_bound[j][i] since multi-generational film grain is not allowed.


The parameter num_model_values_minus1[j] specifies the number of model values present in each intensity interval for color component j. For all j, this parameter lies in the range [0, 2], which specifies that band-pass filtering and cross-color correlation are not supported.


The parameter comp_model_value[j][i][0] specifies the film grain intensity for color component j and intensity interval i. For all j and i, this parameter lies in the range [0, 255] to ensure film grain simulation can be performed using 16-bit arithmetic.


The parameter comp_model_value[j][i][1] specifies the horizontal high cut frequency that characterizes the film grain shape for color component j and intensity interval i. (The horizontal high and low cut frequencies, together with the vertical high and low cut frequencies that describe the properties of a two-dimensional filter that characterizes the desired film grain pattern). For all j and i, this parameter lies in the range [2, 14], which includes all the required grain patterns.


The parameter comp_model_value[j][i][2] specifies the vertical high cut frequency that characterizes a film grain shape for color component j and intensity interval i. For all j and i, this parameter shall be in the range [2, 14] which includes all the required grain patterns. For the combination of all the color components j and intensity intervals i in an SEI message, the number of different pairs (comp_model_value[j][i][1], comp_model_value[j][i][2]) remains not greater than 10.


All the other parameters in the film grain SEI message specified by the ITU-T Rec. H.264|ISO/IEC 14496-10 standard have no constraint according to this specification.


In accordance with the present principles, bit accurate film grain simulation occurs in the current picture unless the parameter film_grain_characteristics_cancel_flag equals unity or the frame range specified by the parameter film_grain_characteristics_repetition_period becomes exhausted. The current specifications of the ITU-T Rec. H.264|ISO/IEC 14496-10 standard allows the simulation of film grain in all color components. Film grain is simulated and added to color component c of the decoded image if the parameter comp_model_present_flag[c] equals unity in the film grain SEI message. Bit-accurate film grain simulation occurs by specifying: a database of film grain patterns; a uniform pseudo-random number generator; and a precise sequence of operations. Film grain simulation typically occurs independently for each color component.



FIG. 2 depicts a block schematic diagram of a method in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present principles for simulating film grain. The method commences upon execution 100 to establish parameters for the simulated film grain. Part of the process of establishing the film grain parameters for the simulated film grain includes extracting film grain information carried by the incoming video signal. With the incoming video signal encoded using the ITU-T Rec. H.264|ISO/IEC 14496-10 video coding standard, the film grain information will exist in the SEI message. Extracting the SEI message requires decoding of the incoming H-264 coded incoming video signal using a H.264|MPEG-4 AVC-compliant decoder 101 as shown in FIG. 2.


As discussed above, the SEI message contains several parameters, including intensity_interval_lower_bound[c][i] and intensity_interval_upper_bound[c][i] parameters where i ranges from 0 to the value of the parameter num_intensity_intervals_minus1[c]. These SEI message parameters undergo a comparison against the average pixel intensity value computed during step 102 for a color component c of each non-overlapping 8×8 pixel block in the decoded image stored in a display buffer 102 following decoding by the decoder 101. For each non-overlapping 8×8 pixel block from color component c of the decoded image, computation of the average value occurs during step 102 in the following manner:
















avg = 0



for(i = 0..7, j = 0 . . . 7)









avg += decoded_image[c][m+i][n+j]









avg = (avg + 32) >> 6










where (m,n) are the coordinates of top-left corner of the block and decoded_image[c][x][y] is the decoded pixel value at coordinates (x,y) of a color component c which can take on values of 0, 1 or 2 representing a particular one of three primary color components.


The value of i for which the macroblock average pixel intensity value remain not less than intensity_interval_lower_bound[c][i] and not greater than intensity_interval_upper_bound[c][i] serves as the basis for selecting the film grain parameters for the film grain simulated for the current block in the image. If no value exists that fulfills the condition, no film grain simulation will occur for the current block.


The film grain parameter selection process typically includes the step of scaling the cut frequencies when processing chroma components (c=1, 2) in order to adapt to the 4:2:0 chroma format as follows:


comp_model_value[c][s][1]=Clip(2, 14, (comp_model_value[c][s][1]<<1))


comp_model_value[c][s][2]=Clip(2, 14, (comp_model_value[c][s][2]<<1))


Step 104 initiates establishing a film grain block, typically although not necessarily 8×8 pixels in size. The step of establishing a film grain block of 8×8 pixels involves retrieving a block of 8×8 film grain sample from a film grain database 105, and scaling the sample to the proper intensity, although scaling while desirable need not necessarily occur. The database 103 typically comprises 169 patterns of 4,096 film grain samples, each representing a 64×64 film grain pattern. The database 105 stores the values in 2′s complement form, ranging from −127 to 127. Synthesis of each film grain pattern typically occurs using a specific pair of cut frequencies that establish a two-dimensional filter that defines the film grain pattern. The cut frequencies transmitted in the SEI message enable access of the database 105 of film grain patterns during film grain simulation.


The scaled cut frequencies (comp_model_value[c][s][1] and comp_model_value[c][s][2]) determine which pattern of the database serves as the source of film grain samples. Two randomly generated values serve to select an 8×8 block from the pattern selected in accordance with the cut frequencies. These random values used to select the 8×8 pixel film grain block represent a horizontal and vertical offset within the 64×64 pixel pattern and are created using the following procedure:


i_offset=(MSB16(x(k, ec)) % 52)


i_offset &=0xFFFC


i_offset+=m&0x0008


j_offset=(LSB16(x(k, ec)) % 56)


j_offset &=0xFFF8


j_offset+=n&0x0008


where x(k, ec) indicates the k-th symbol of the sequence x of pseudo-random numbers initiated with the seed ec, MSB16 and LSB16 denote the 16 most significant bits and 16 least significant bits, respectively, and (m,n) are the coordinates of the current 8×8 block in the decoded image. For the i_offset, the first equation generates a pseudo-random value uniformly distributed in the range [0,51], the second equation restricts that value to multiples of 4, and the last equation adds 8 to i_offset when m % 16 equals 8. Equivalent operations are performed for the j_offset.


A uniform pseudo-random number generator 106 provides the pseudo-random numbers used to select the 8×8 pixel block. Referring to FIG. 3, the pseudo-random number generator 106 typically comprises a 32 bit shift register that implements a primitive polynomial modulo 2 operator, x^31+x^3+1, to randomly select film grain blocks of 8×8 pixels from the film grain patterns of 64×64 pixels in the database. The two pseudo-random numbers used for 8×8 film grain block selection comprise the 16 Most Significant Bits (MSB) and the 16 Least Significant Bits, respectively output by the shit register.


The pseudo-random value x(k, ec), created using the pseudo-random number generator 106 undergoes updating every 16 pixels (horizontally) and every 16 lines (vertically) of the image. The same pseudo-random number x(k, ec) is used in each non-overlapping area of 16×16 pixels of the decoded image. As illustrated in FIG. 4, the resulting sequence of pseudo-random values x(k, ec) follows a raster scan order over a 16×16 pixels grid. While the illustrated embodiment assumes a raster scan order of blocks of 8×8 pixels, other implementations remain possible.


The random number generator 106 has different seeding depending on the color component (c) to which film grain is being added. Upon receipt of a film grain SEI message, the seed e1, used for simulating film grain on the first color component, typically has a value of unity. The seed e2, used for simulating film grain on the second color component, typically has a value of 557,794,999; whereas the seed e3, used for simulating film grain on the third color component, typically has a value of 974,440,221.


Referring to FIG. 2, after computing the random offsets, extraction of 64 film grain values from the database and scaling (if necessary) occurs as follows:














scale_factor = BIT0(x(k, ec)) == 0 ? comp_model_value[c][s][0] : −


comp_model_value[c][s][0]


for (i = 0 . . . 7, j = 0 . . . 7)


g = scale_factor * database[h][v][i + i_offset][j+j_offset]









film_grain_block[i][j] = (((g + 2log2_scale_factor − 1) >>



log2_scale_factor ) + 32) >> 6










where h is equal to comp_model_value[c][s][1]−2, v is equal to comp_model_value[c][s][2]−2 and the factor 6 scales the film grain values retrieved from the film grain pattern database. BIT0 denotes the LSB.


During step 108, deblocking filtering occurs between each film grain block created during step 104 and a previous block 109 to ensure the seamless formation of film grain patterns. Deblocking filtering applies only to the vertical edges between adjacent blocks. Assuming simulation of film grain blocks in raster scan order and that the left-most pixels of the current_fg_block lie adjacent to the right-most pixels of the previous_fg_block, deblocking filtering typically occurs by means of a 3-tap filter with coefficients 1,2,1 (not shown) as follows:














for (i = 0, j = 0 . . . 7)









current_fg_block[i][j] = ( previous_fg_block[i + 7][j] +









(current_fg_block [i   ][j] << 1) +



 current_fg_block [i + 1][j] + 2) >> 2









previous_fg_block[i + 7][j] = ( previous_fg_block[i + 6][j] +









(previous_fg_block[i + 7][j] << 1) +



 current_fg_block [i   ][j] + 2) >> 2









At the end of the film grain simulation process, the deblocked film grain block undergoes blending with the corresponding decoded image block via a block 110 and the result undergoes clipping to [0, 255] prior to display in the following manner:














for (i = 0..7, j = 0..7)


display_image[c][m+i][n+j] = Clip(0, 255, decoded_image[c][m+i][n+j] +









fg_block[i][j])










where (m,n) are the coordinates of the top-left corner of the block, decoded_image[c][x][y] is the decoded pixel value at coordinates (x,y) of color component c and display_image[c][x][y] is the video output at the same coordinates.


A switching element 111 controls the passage of the deblocked film grain block to the block 110 under the control of a control element 112. The control element 112 controls the switching element responsive to whether the SEI message parameter film_grain_characteristics_cancel_flag equals unity or the frame range specified by the parameter film_grain_characteristics_repetition_period has been exceeded which dictate whether film grain simulation should occur as discussed above.


The foregoing describes a technique for simulating film grain that has application in consumer electronic devices, such as set top boxes, HD-DVD players, television sets, and camcorders. The relatively low cost of random access memory readily permits incorporation of the film grain database 105 within a memory element. The combination of one or more of a microprocessor, programmable gate array and dedicated logic circuit, depicted generally in block 114 in FIG. 2 can readily execute the steps of establishing the film grain parameters, creating a film grain block and deblocking filtering, to yield a film grain block for addition to a video image.

Claims
  • 1. A method for simulating a film grain block, comprising the steps of: establishing at least one parameter at least in part in accordance with an attribute of an incoming image;establishing at least one block of film grain in accordance with the at least one parameter by: (a) providing a plurality of film grain patterns for selection;(b) randomly selecting from among the plurality of film grain patterns a source pattern by (1) generating first and second pseudo-random numbers; (2) generating first and second offsets within the film grain pattern based on the first and second pseudo-random numbers; and (3) extracting the film grain block at a location in the film grain pattern specified by the first and second offsets; and(c) selecting from the source pattern a block of film grain; andapplying deblocking filtering only to the vertical edges of the film grain block.
  • 2. The method according to claim 1 wherein the at least one image parameter comprises average pixel intensity.
  • 3. The method according to claim 2 further comprising the step of thresholding the average pixel intensity in accordance with upper and lower pixel intensity thresholds contained in supplemental information accompanying the image.
  • 4. The method according to claim 1 further comprising the step of scaling the extracted film grain block.
  • 5. The method according to claim 1 wherein the step of generating the first and second pseudo-random numbers further comprises the steps of: seeding a shift register with a seed value selected in accordance with a color component of the macroblock, andextracting a set of most significant bits as the first pseudo-random number; andextracting a set of least significant bits as the second pseudo-random number.
  • 6. The method according to claim 1 further comprising the step of blending the deblocked film grain pattern with the image block.
  • 7. The method according to claim 1 wherein the deblocking step further comprises the step of deblocking the vertical edges between adjacent blocks of film grain.
  • 8. A method for simulating film grain in a 4:2:0 chroma format in at least one block of an image, comprising the steps of: establishing at least one film grain parameter in 4:2:0 chroma format in accordance with at least one attribute of the at least one block by scaling cut frequencies; andderiving a film grain block from a database of film grain patterns by randomly selecting the film grain block from the database in accordance with the at least one film grain parameter.
  • 9. The method according to claim 8 further comprising the step of deblocking at least a portion of the derived film grain block.
  • 10. The method according to claim 8 further comprising the step of blending the deblocked film grain block with the at least one image block.
  • 11. Apparatus for simulating a film grain block, comprising: a film grain simulator for establishing at least one parameter at least in part in accordance with an attribute of incoming image, and for establishing at least one block of film grain for blending in a decoded image in accordance with the parameter, the film grain simulator including a deblocking filter for only filtering the vertical edges of the film grain block, the film grain simulator having means for establishing at least one block of film grain in accordance with the at least one parameter, including means for providing a plurality of film grain patterns for selection; means for randomly selecting from among the plurality of film grain patterns a source pattern by (1) generating first and second pseudo-random numbers; (2) generating first and second offsets within the film grain pattern based on the first and second pseudo-random numbers; and (3) extracting the film grain block at a location in the film grain pattern specified by the first and second offsets; and means for selecting from the source pattern a block of film grain.
  • 12. The apparatus according to claim 11 wherein the at least one image parameter comprises average pixel intensity.
  • 13. The apparatus according to claim method 12 further including means for thresholding the average pixel intensity in accordance with upper and lower pixel intensity thresholds contained in supplemental information accompanying the image.
  • 14. The apparatus according to claim 11 further comprising means for scaling the extracted film grain block.
  • 15. The apparatus according to claim 11 wherein the means for generating the first and second pseudo random numbers further comprises: a shift register seeded with a value selected in accordance with a color component of the macroblock, for yielding a set of most significant bits as the first pseudo-random number and a set of least significant bits as the second pseudo-random number.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/246,848, filed Oct. 7, 2005 now abandoned, herein incorporated by reference.

US Referenced Citations (129)
Number Name Date Kind
4897775 Kaassens Jan 1990 A
4935816 Faber Jun 1990 A
4998167 Jaqua Mar 1991 A
5028280 Ihara et al. Jul 1991 A
5140414 Mowry Aug 1992 A
5216556 Steinberg et al. Jun 1993 A
5262248 Ihara et al. Nov 1993 A
5285402 Keith Feb 1994 A
5335013 Faber Aug 1994 A
5374954 Mowry Dec 1994 A
5406326 Mowry Apr 1995 A
5453840 Parker et al. Sep 1995 A
5457491 Mowry Oct 1995 A
5461596 Barrett Oct 1995 A
5471572 Buchner et al. Nov 1995 A
5475425 Przyborski et al. Dec 1995 A
5526446 Adelson et al. Jun 1996 A
5550815 Cloonan et al. Aug 1996 A
5629769 Cookingham et al. May 1997 A
5641596 Gray et al. Jun 1997 A
5659382 Rybczynski Aug 1997 A
5687011 Mowry Nov 1997 A
5706361 Kent et al. Jan 1998 A
5709972 Cookingham et al. Jan 1998 A
5715008 Sekiguchi et al. Feb 1998 A
5742892 Chaddha Apr 1998 A
5767860 Zimmer et al. Jun 1998 A
5805782 Foran Sep 1998 A
5817447 Yip Oct 1998 A
5831673 Przyborski et al. Nov 1998 A
5832172 Jeon Nov 1998 A
5845017 Keyes Dec 1998 A
5917609 Breeuwer et al. Jun 1999 A
6067125 May May 2000 A
6134200 Timmermans Oct 2000 A
6216838 Bacher et al. Apr 2001 B1
6219838 Cherichetti et al. Apr 2001 B1
6233647 Bentz et al. May 2001 B1
6269180 Sevigny Jul 2001 B1
6285711 Ratakonda et al. Sep 2001 B1
6327304 Miller et al. Dec 2001 B1
6327391 Ohnishi et al. Dec 2001 B1
6370192 Pearlstein et al. Apr 2002 B1
6373992 Nagao Apr 2002 B1
6441918 Hori Aug 2002 B1
6459699 Kimura et al. Oct 2002 B1
6496221 Wolf et al. Dec 2002 B1
6559849 Anderson et al. May 2003 B1
6587509 Suzuki et al. Jul 2003 B1
6650327 Airey et al. Nov 2003 B1
6665369 Ukita Dec 2003 B2
6667815 Nagao Dec 2003 B1
6724942 Arai Apr 2004 B1
6728317 Demos Apr 2004 B1
6744928 Juri et al. Jun 2004 B1
6839152 Fan et al. Jan 2005 B2
6868190 Morton Mar 2005 B1
6963668 Engeldrum et al. Nov 2005 B2
6990251 Edgar Jan 2006 B2
6990252 Shekter Jan 2006 B2
6995793 Albadawi et al. Feb 2006 B1
7065256 Alon et al. Jun 2006 B2
7092016 Morton et al. Aug 2006 B2
7106907 Lin et al. Sep 2006 B2
7245783 Fielding Jul 2007 B2
7362911 Frank Apr 2008 B1
7596239 Winger et al. Sep 2009 B2
7630005 Takei Dec 2009 B2
7653132 Dane Jan 2010 B2
7664337 Balram et al. Feb 2010 B2
7680356 Boyce et al. Mar 2010 B2
7738722 Gomila et al. Jun 2010 B2
7742655 Gomila et al. Jun 2010 B2
7856055 Zhou et al. Dec 2010 B2
7958532 Paul et al. Jun 2011 B2
20010056568 Hirotsu et al. Dec 2001 A1
20020003903 Engeldrum et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020016103 Behnke Feb 2002 A1
20020034337 Shekter Mar 2002 A1
20020106103 Jones et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020120972 Nakamura Sep 2002 A1
20020133764 Wang Sep 2002 A1
20020154140 Tazaki Oct 2002 A1
20020163657 Bogdanowicz et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020171649 Fogg Nov 2002 A1
20030011615 Tidwell Jan 2003 A1
20030031128 Kim et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030043922 Kalker et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030063778 Rowe et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030068097 Wilson et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030086623 Berkner et al. May 2003 A1
20030101453 Matsuyama et al. May 2003 A1
20030206231 Chen et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030206662 Avinash et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030218610 Mech et al. Nov 2003 A1
20040006575 Visharam et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040013308 Jeon et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040071363 Kouri et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040073926 Nakamura et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040101059 Joch et al. May 2004 A1
20040208389 Lin Oct 2004 A1
20040264795 Fielding Dec 2004 A1
20060007460 Bogdanowicz et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060013320 Oguz et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060072660 Jia et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060082649 Gomila et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060083316 Cooper et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060083426 Cooper et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060083429 Rjoly Apr 2006 A1
20060104366 Huang et al. May 2006 A1
20060133686 Gomila et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060182183 Winger Aug 2006 A1
20060183275 Schoner et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060256853 Schlockermann et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060256871 Boyce et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060291557 Tourapis Dec 2006 A1
20070002947 Lu et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070030996 Winger et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070036452 Llach et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070047658 Tourapis et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070058866 Boyce et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070058878 Gomilla et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070070241 Boyce et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070104380 Gomila et al. May 2007 A1
20070117291 Cooper et al. May 2007 A1
20070140588 Balram et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070297515 Gomila et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080252781 DeWaele et al. Oct 2008 A1
20100104025 Rose et al. Apr 2010 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (59)
Number Date Country
0364285 Apr 1990 EP
0373615 Jun 1990 EP
0756281 Mar 1997 EP
0800313 Oct 1997 EP
0575006 Oct 1999 EP
0622000 Mar 2000 EP
1175091 Jan 2002 EP
1215624 Jun 2002 EP
1511320 Mar 2005 EP
2312124 Oct 1997 GB
1156069 Jun 1989 JP
04-097681 Mar 1992 JP
04349458 Dec 1992 JP
5252459 Sep 1993 JP
8079765 Mar 1996 JP
8149466 Jun 1996 JP
9062718 Mar 1997 JP
9139940 May 1997 JP
9247681 Sep 1997 JP
9275529 Oct 1997 JP
10509297 Sep 1998 JP
20041242 Aug 2000 JP
2001357090 Dec 2001 JP
2001357095 Dec 2001 JP
2002359845 Dec 2002 JP
2002374541 Dec 2002 JP
200324326 Jan 2003 JP
2003163853 Jun 2003 JP
2003179923 Jun 2003 JP
2004120057 Apr 2004 JP
2004135169 Apr 2004 JP
2007529945 Oct 2007 JP
2073913 Sep 1991 RU
2088962 Aug 1997 RU
2139637 Oct 1999 RU
WO9206409 Apr 1992 WO
WO9314591 Jul 1993 WO
WO9520292 Jul 1995 WO
WO 9710676 Mar 1997 WO
WO9722204 Jun 1997 WO
WO9841026 Sep 1998 WO
WO 0018109 Mar 2000 WO
WO0146992 Jun 2001 WO
WO0174064 Oct 2001 WO
WO0177871 Oct 2001 WO
WO 0233958 Apr 2002 WO
WO0251160 Jun 2002 WO
WO03005731 Jan 2003 WO
WO2004034518 Apr 2004 WO
WO2004095829 Nov 2004 WO
WO2004104931 Dec 2004 WO
WO2004105250 Dec 2004 WO
WO2005027045 Mar 2005 WO
WO2005032143 Apr 2005 WO
WO2005034518 Apr 2005 WO
WO2005039188 Apr 2005 WO
WO2005039189 Apr 2005 WO
WO2006022705 Mar 2006 WO
WO2006057703 Jun 2006 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (79)
Entry
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/556,834 mailed Aug. 19, 2008.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/556,834 mailed Feb. 20, 2009.
Notice of Non-Compliant Amendment from U.S. Appl. No. 10/556,834 mailed Jun. 16, 2009.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/569,318 mailed Aug. 15, 2008.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/569,318 mailed Feb. 13, 2009.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/569,318 mailed Jul. 31, 2009.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/572,820 mailed Jun. 1, 2009.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/571,148 mailed Apr. 15, 2009.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/575,676 mailed Dec. 15, 2008.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/575,676 mailed Mar. 13, 2009.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/252,177 mailed May 29, 2008.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/252,177 mailed Nov. 5, 2008.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/252,177 mailed Apr. 17, 2009.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/252,177 mailed Sep. 18, 2009.
McLean, I, et al., “Telecine Noise Reduction”, IEE Seminar Digital Restoration of Film and Video Archives (Ref. No. 01/049), IEE Seminar Digital Restoration of Film and Video Archives, London, UK. Jan. 16, 2001, pp. 2/1-2/6.
Yan, Jacky Chun Kit, et al. “Film Grain Noise Removal and Generation for Color Images”, 1997 IEEE Signal Processing Workshop on Higher-Order Statistics, Jul. 21-23, Banff, Alberta, Canada. pp. 73-76.
Yan, Jacky Chun Kit, et al. “Signal Dependent Film Grain Noise Removal and Generation Based on Higher-Order Statistics”, 1997 IEEE Signal Processing Workshop on Higher-Order Statistics, Jul. 21-23, Banff, Alberta, Canada. pp. 77-81.
Al-Shaykh, Osama K., et al., “Restoration of Lossy Compressed Noisy Images”, IEEE Transactions of Image Processing, vol. 8. No. 10, pp. 1348-1360, Oct. 1999.
Al-Shaykh, Osama K, et al. “Lossy Compression of Images Corrupted by Film Grain Noise”, Proceedings International Conference on Image Processing, Sep. 16-19, 1996, Lausanne, Switzerland vol. I of III, pp. 805-808.
Campisi, P. et al. “Signal-dependent film grain noise generation using homomorphic adaptive filtering.”, IEE Proceedings Vision, Image and Signal Processing, vol. 147, No. 3 pp. 283-287 Jun. 2000.
Yoshida, J, “Go with the Grain, Film R&D Chief Urges, for Art's Sake”. EETimes, http://www.eetimes.com/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=59301182 (last checked Jul. 23, 2007).
Zhao, Lifeng, et al., “Constant Quality Rate Control for Streaming MPEG-4 FGS Video”, IEEE, 2002, pp. 544-547.
Al-Shaykh, Osama K, et al., “Lossy Compression of Noisy Images”, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing vol. 7, No. 12, Dec. 1998, pp. 1641-1652.
Brightwell, PJ, et al., “Automated Correction of Film Unsteadiness, Dirt and Grain”, International Broadcasting Convention, Sep. 16-20, 1994 Conference Publication, No. 397.
Oktem, R, et al., “Transform Domain Algorithm for Reducing Effect of Film Grain Noise in Image Compression”, Electronics Letters, vol. 35, No. 21, Oct. 14, 1999, pp. 1830-1831.
Fischer, Marco, et al., “Image Sharpening Using Permutation Weighted Medians”, Dept of Electrical Engineering, University of Delware Newark, DE, pp. 1-4, 2002.
Shahnaz, Rubeena, et al., “Image Compression in Signal-Dependent Noise”, Applied Optics, vol. 38, No. 26, Sep. 10, 1999, pp. 5560-5567.
Chavel, P., et al., “Film Grain Noise in Partially Coherent Imaging”, Optical Engineering, vol. 19, No. 3, May/Jun. 1980, pp. 404-410.
Zhang, Xi Min, et al., “Constant Quality Constrained Rate Allocation for FGS Video Coded Bitstreams”, Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 4671, pp. 817-827, 2002.
Peng, Sharon, et al., Adaptive Frequency Weighting for Fine-Granularity-Scalability, Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 4671, pp. 840-849, 2002.
Van Der Schaar, M., et al., “Fine-Granularity for Wireless Video and Scalable Storage”, Proceedings of SPIE vol. 4671, pp. 805-816, 2002.
Prades-Nebot, Josep, et al., “Rate Control for Fully Fine Grained Scalable Video Coders”, Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 4671, pp. 828-839, 2002.
Yan, Rong, et al., “Efficient Video Coding with Hybrid Spatial and Fine Grain SNR Scalabilities”, Proceedings of SPIE vol. 4671, pp. 850-859, 2002.
Conklin, Greg. et al. “Dithering 5-tap Filter for Inloop Deblocking”, RealNetworks, Inc., Joint Video Team (JVT) of ISO/IEC MPEG & ITU-T VCEG, May 6-10, 2002, pp. 1-16, VA.
Gomila, Christina, “SEI message for film grain encoding”, Thomson Inc., Joint Video Team (JVT) of ISO/IEC MPEG & ITU-T VCEG, XP-002308742, May 23-27, 2003, pp. 1-14, CH.
Gomila, Christina, et al. “Simplification of the JVT deblocking filter”, Thomson Multimedia, Joint Video Team (JVT) of ISO/IEC MPEG & ITU-T VCEG, May 6-10, 2002, 16 pgs. VA.
Schlockermann, Martin et al “Film grain coding in H.264/AVC”, Panasonic, Joint Video team (JVT) of ISO/IEC MPEG & ITU-T VCEG, Sep. 2-5, 2003, pp. 1-8, San Diego.
Gomila, “SEI Message for Film Grain Encoding: Syntax and Results”, JVT of ISO IEC MPEG and ITU-T JVT-1013 Revision 2 Sep. 2, 2003, XP002309743, pp. 1-11.
Bjontegaard,G: “Addition of Comfort Noise as Post Processing” ITU-Telecommunications Standardization Sector, Study Group 16, 2nd Meeting, Sunriver, Oregon, Sep. 8-11, 1997.
McMahon, T et al.: “High WQuatity SD and HD AVC Test Results” JVT Team of ISO/IEC MPEG & ITU-T VCEG (ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11 and ITU-T SG16 Q.6) 5th Meeting : Geneva,. CH 9-17 Oct. 2002.
Naderi, F. et at: “Estimation of Images Degraded by Film Grain Noise” Applied Optics, vol. 17, Issue 8, pp. 1228-1237, Jan. 1, 1998.
Schaar et al: Fine Granularity Scalability for Wireless Video and Scalable Storage Visual Communications and Image Processing 2002. Proceeding of SPIE, vol. 4671 (2001) SPIE 0277-786X/02.
Iliingworth, et al. “Vision, Image and Signal Processing”, The Institute of Electrical Engineers, IEE Proceedings, Jun. 2000. vol. 147, No. 3.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/556,833 mailed May 10, 2010.
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/556,833 mailed Oct. 20. 2010.
Office Action ADV Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/556,833 mailed Jan. 7, 2011.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/556,833 mailed Feb. 15, 2011.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/556,833 mailed May 10, 2011.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/556,833 mailed Sep. 30, 2011.
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/571,148 mailed May 12, 2010.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/571,148 mailed Sep. 10, 2010.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/572,280 mailed Mar. 19, 2010.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/572,820 mailed May 11, 2010.
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/572,280 mailed Sep. 30, 2010.
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/575,676 mailed Mar. 4, 2020.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/575,676 mailed Jul. 19, 2011.
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/575,676 mailed Oct. 26, 2011.
Office Action ADV Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/575,676 Mailed Jun. 7, 2010.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/581,151 mailed Jan. 20, 2010.
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/246,848 mailed Jul. 6, 2010.
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/246,848 mailed Oct. 13, 2010.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/268,070 mailed Jul. 21, 2010.
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/268,070 mailed Nov. 12, 2010.
Office Action ADV Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/268,070 mailed Jan. 11, 2011.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/268,010 mailed Jun. 22, 2011.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/273,067 mailed Aug. 4, 2010.
Office Action from 11/284,378 mailed Dec. 22, 2010.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/285,540 mailed Nov. 23, 2010.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/285,540 mailed Mar. 30, 2011.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/667,581 mailed Jun. 8. 2011.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/667,629 mailed Jul. 9, 2010.
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/667,629 mailed Nov. 19, 2010.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/667,629 mailed Jan. 13, 2011.
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/667,629 mailed Apr. 22, 2011.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/667,816 mailed Sep. 15, 2011.
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/667,816 mailed Oct. 14, 2011.
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/667,816 mailed Dec. 5, 2011.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/667,846 mailed Oct. 4, 2011.
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/667,581 mailed Oct. 14, 2011.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20100080455 A1 Apr 2010 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 11246848 Oct 2005 US
Child 12589217 US