The present invention relates generally to an electronic filter assembly for use in the cable television (CATV) industry, and more specifically to a circuit assembly that mitigates home data network signals from reflecting within a user's network.
In many data distribution networks, electrical signals conveying information propagate along transmission lines across distances and through splitting devices. For example, in a cable television (CATV) network, media content propagates downstream from a head-end facility toward media devices located in various facilities such as homes and businesses. Along the way, the electrical signals conveying the media content propagate along main trunks, through taps, and along multiple branches that ultimately distribute the content to drop cables at respective facilities. The drop cable, which may be a single coaxial cable, typically is connected to a splitting device having two or more outlet ports. Distribution cables connected to the outlet ports route the signals to various rooms, often extending to one or more media devices. The network of distribution cables, splitters, and distribution points is referred to as a drop system.
A typical data distribution network provides many content selections to a user's media devices within the drop system, such as one or more televisions equipped with set top boxes or cable modems. Content selection propagated on a downstream bandwidth of the CATV system may include broadcast television channels, video on demand services, internet data, home security services, and voice over internet (VOIP) services. The content selections are typically propagated in a discrete frequency range, or channel, that is distinct from the frequency ranges of other content selections. Downstream bandwidth includes frequencies typically ranging from 50-1,000 megahertz (MHz).
The typical data distribution network is a two-way communication system. The downstream bandwidth carries signals from the head end to the user and an upstream bandwidth carries upstream signals from the user to the head end. Upstream bandwidth may include data related to video on demand services, such as video requests and billing authorization; internet uploads, such as photo albums or user account information; security monitoring; or other services predicated on signals or data emanating from a subscriber's home. Upstream bandwidth frequencies typically range from 7-49 MHz.
A user data network, or home network, may be coupled to the cable television network via the same coaxial cable delivering the downstream and upstream bandwidth of the CATV system. Often, the user data network is a home entertainment network providing multiple streams of high definition video and entertainment. Examples of home networking technologies include Ethernet, HomePlug, HPNA, and 802.11n. In another example, the user data network may employ technology standards developed by the Multimedia over Coax Alliance (MoCA). The MoCA standards promote networking of personal data utilizing the existing coaxial cable that is already wired throughout the user premises. MoCA technology provides the backbone for personal data networks of multiple wired and wireless products including voice, data, security, home heating/cooling, and video technologies. In such an arrangement, the cable drop from the cable system operator shares the coaxial line or network connection with MoCA-certified devices such as a broadband router or a set top box. The operators use coaxial wiring already existing within the home or business to interconnect the wired and wireless MoCA devices by directly connecting them to the coaxial jacks throughout the premises. MoCA technology delivers broadband-caliber data rates exceeding 130 Mbps, and supports as many as sixteen end points.
A MoCA-certified device such as the broadband router interconnects other MoCA-certified components located within the premises, for example additional set top boxes, routers and gateways, bridges, optical network terminals, computers, gaming systems, display devices, printers, network-attached storage, and home automation such as furnace settings and lighting control. The home network allows distribution and sharing of data or entertainment content among the MoCA-connected devices. For example, a high definition program recorded on a set top box in the living room may be played back by a second set top box located in a bedroom. And, a high definition movie recorded on a camcorder and stored on a user's personal computer may be accessed and displayed through any of the set top boxes within the premises. The home network may also allow high-definition gaming between rooms.
The home network may utilize an open spectrum bandwidth on the coaxial cable to transmit the personal data content, such as entertainment content. For example, a cable system operator may utilize a bandwidth of frequencies up to 1002 MHz, and a satellite system operator may utilize a bandwidth of frequencies from 1550-2450 MHz. The unused range of frequencies in this example, or open spectrum bandwidth, is 1002-1550 MHz. In another example, the open spectrum bandwidth may be higher than 2450 MHz. In one particular example, the Multimedia over Coax Alliance specifies an open spectrum, or home network bandwidth, of 1125-1525 MHz. A home network utilizing the open spectrum bandwidth does not interfere with any of the bandwidth being utilized by the cable television or satellite services provider.
An exemplary filter designed for use in a MoCA network is installed at the point of entry to a premises to allow MoCA transmissions to propagate throughout the home network while preventing the them from interfering with adjacent subscribers in the CATV network. Thus, the MoCA filter passes signals in the provider bandwidth and attenuates signals in the home network bandwidth. One problem noted with existing MoCA filters attenuating the home network spectrum is multipath interference. Multipath interference, or distortion, is a phenomenon in the physics of waves in which a wave from a transmitter travels to a receiver via two or more paths and, under the right conditions, two or more of the wave components interfere. The interference arises due to the wave components having traveled a different path defined by diffraction and the geometric length. The differing speed results in the wave components arriving at the receiver out of phase with each other. Multipath interference is a common cause of “ghosting” in analog television broadcasts, and is exacerbated m a MoCA network because the MoCA standard requires very high transmission energy (e.g., low power loss in the MoCA bandwidth). This high transmission power results in greater reflections at the ports of devices.
A filter circuit is disclosed. The filter circuit includes a pass band filter and a multipath interference mitigation leg. The pass band filter is disposed along a signal path between a provider-side port and a user-side port. The pass band filter is configured to pass a provider bandwidth signal received at the provider-side port and block at least a portion of a home network bandwidth signal received at the user-side port. A frequency spectrum of the home network bandwidth signal is distinct from, and higher than, a frequency spectrum of the provider bandwidth signal. The multipath interference mitigation leg is operatively branched to ground from the signal path. The multipath interference mitigation leg is configured to increase a return loss in the home network bandwidth signal.
In another embodiment the filter circuit includes a pass band filter and a multipath interference mitigation leg. The pass band filter is configured to block at least a portion of a home network bandwidth signal received at a user-side port. The multipath interference mitigation leg is configured to be operatively branched to ground and increase a return loss in the home network bandwidth signal. A frequency spectrum of the home network bandwidth signal is distinct from, and higher than, a frequency spectrum of a provider bandwidth signal received at a provider-side port.
A pass band filter for mitigating multipath interference is also disclosed. The pass band filter includes a pass portion, an attenuation portion, and an interference mitigation portion. The pass portion is configured to pass a provider signal received at a provider-side port to a user-side port. The provider signal has a provider bandwidth. The attenuating portion is configured to attenuate a home network signal received at the user-side port. The home network signal has a home network bandwidth. The interference mitigation portion is configured to increase a return loss in the home network bandwidth so as to mitigate multipath interference. The home network bandwidth has a home network frequency spectrum that is distinct from, and higher than, a provider frequency spectrum of the provider bandwidth.
A device for mitigating multipath interference is also disclosed. The device includes a pass portion, an attenuating portion, and an interference mitigation portion. The pass portion is configured to pass a provider signal received at a provider-side port to a user-side port. The provider signal has a provider bandwidth. The attenuating portion is configured to attenuate a home network signal received at the user-side port. The home network signal having a home network bandwidth. The interference mitigation portion is configured to increase a return loss in the home network bandwidth so as to mitigate multipath interference. The home network bandwidth has a home network frequency spectrum that is distinct from, and higher than, a provider frequency spectrum of the provider bandwidth.
A pass band filter is also disclosed. The pass band filter includes means for passing a provider signal having a provider bandwidth received at a provider-side port to a user-side port. The provider signal has a provider bandwidth. The pass band filter also includes means for attenuating a home network signal received at the user-side port. The home network signal having a home network bandwidth. The pass band filter also includes means for increasing a return loss in the home network bandwidth so as to mitigate multipath interference. The home network bandwidth has a home network frequency spectrum that is distinct from, and higher than, a provider frequency spectrum of the provider bandwidth.
A filter circuit having a frequency response is also disclosed. The filter circuit includes a signal path extending from an input to an output. The signal path includes a conductive path and a ground. The filter circuit also includes a pass band filter portion disposed along the signal path between the input and the output. The pass band filter portion is configured to pass a first frequency spectrum in a provider bandwidth and attenuate a second frequency spectrum in a home network bandwidth. The frequency response of the filter circuit is characterized by an insertion loss characteristic between the input and the output being less than 3 decibels (dB) in the provider bandwidth and more than 20 dB in the home network bandwidth. The frequency response is further characterized by a return loss characteristic at the output being more than 10 dB in the provider bandwidth and more than 20 dB in the home network bandwidth.
A filter circuit having a frequency response is also disclosed. The filter circuit includes a pass band filter portion configured to pass a first frequency spectrum in a provider bandwidth and attenuate a second frequency spectrum in a home network bandwidth so as to provide the frequency response. The frequency response includes an insertion loss of less than 3 decibels (dB) in the provider bandwidth and more than 20 dB in the home network bandwidth. The frequency response further includes a return loss of more than 10 dB in the provider bandwidth and more than 20 dB in the home network bandwidth.
For a further understanding of the invention, reference will be made to the following detailed description of the invention which is to be read in connection with the accompanying drawing, wherein:
Referring to
The provider bandwidth 4 passes through a MoCA-enabled splitter 6 having an input port 8 and two distribution ports 10a, 10b respectively. In one example, distribution port 10a is coupled via coaxial cable to a MoCA-enabled device 12 such as a wireless router. Distribution port 10b is coupled to a second MoCA-enabled splitter 14. The second splitter 14 likewise includes an input port 16, a second distribution port 18 connected to a second MoCA-enabled second device 20, such as a set top box, and a third distribution port 22 connected to a third MoCA-enabled third device 24, such as another set top box.
The second splitter 14 is adapted to freely transmit data on a home network bandwidth 26 from any port to any other port. For example, data on the home network bandwidth 26 may be transmitted from the second distribution port 18 to the third distribution port 22. In another example, data may be transmitted in an upstream direction from the first set top box 20 to the second distribution port 18 and through the second input port 16, through the distribution port 10b, then in a downstream direction through distribution port 10a to the wireless router 12. The data may include voice transmission, security, home heating/cooling instructions, and high definition video technologies, for example. The home network bandwidth 26 occupies an open spectrum bandwidth, that is, a frequency range outside the provider bandwidth 4. Referring to the exemplary CATV system above, the home network bandwidth 26 may carry signals in the 1125-1525 MHz range.
In the disclosed embodiment, the filter housing 2 includes internal filter circuitry to secure the home network bandwidth 26 from leaking upstream to other houses on the CATV network, thus protecting the privacy of the home network. One example of the internal filter circuitry, commonly referred to as a point-of-entry or MoCA filter 28, is described in U.S. Pat. No. 8,125,299, entitled “FILTER CIRCUIT”, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Two important characteristics which determine the performance of the signals carried by the coaxial device are insertion loss and return loss. Insertion loss refers to the amount of attenuation the signal receives as it passes from the input to the output. Return loss refers to a measure of the reflected energy from the transmitted signal. The loss value is a negative logarithmic number expressed in decibels (dB) however, as used herein, the negative sign is dropped. Thus, a filter circuit initially having a loss characteristic of 1 dB that is improved to 20 dB improves (or decreases) the reflected signal level from about 80% to about 1%. As a rule of thumb, a 3 dB loss reduces power to one half, 10 dB to one tenth, 20 dB to one hundredth, and 30 dB to one thousandth. Therefore, the larger the insertion loss characteristic, the less energy that is lost passing through the circuit. The larger the return loss characteristic, the less energy that is reflected. Multipath return losses can be generated from splitters, coaxial cable, or point-of-entry filters, for example.
Referring to
Although the return losses 34, 36 may be adequate in the provider bandwidth 4, very high reflections may be experienced in the home network bandwidth 26. Multipath distortions may be generated from the poor return loss produced from the filters stop band. Referring now back to
Referring to
The signal path 144 includes a conductive path 150, such as the center conductor in a coaxial cable, to carry the upstream bandwidth, the downstream bandwidth, and the home network bandwidth. The signal path 144 further includes a ground 152, such as the outer sheath of the coaxial cable that provides a path to ground with various cable connector device.
The filter circuit 142 further includes a pass band filter portion 154 disposed along the signal path 144 between the input 146 and the output 148. The pass band filter portion 154 is configured to pass a first frequency spectrum in the provider bandwidth 104 and attenuate a second frequency spectrum in the home network bandwidth 126. In one embodiment, the pass band filter portion 154 is a hybrid parallel inductor/capacitor (LC) arrangement in which inductors L4 and L5, along with capacitor C8, increase the isolation of the low pass filter. Resonator or tank elements 156a-156c defined by L1/C1, L2/C2, and L3/C3 and capacitive shunts C4, C5, C6, and C7 collectively form an elliptic filter. Other filter designs, such as Butterworth, are equally operable but may require additional components to implement.
The filter circuit 142 further includes a multipath interference mitigation leg 158 operatively branched to ground from the signal path 144. The multipath interference mitigation leg 158 is configured to increase the return loss in the home network bandwidth. In the embodiment shown in
Referring now to
The signal path 244 includes a conductive path, such as the center conductor in a coaxial cable, to carry the upstream bandwidth, the downstream bandwidth, and the home network bandwidth. The signal path 244 further includes a ground 252, such as the outer sheath of the coaxial cable that provides a path to ground with various cable connector devices.
The filter circuit 242 further includes a pass band filter portion 254 disposed along the signal path 244 between the input 246 and the output 248. The pass band filter portion includes capacitors C1-C9 and inductors L1-L6. The pass band filter portion 254 is configured to pass a first frequency spectrum in the provider bandwidth 204 and attenuate a second frequency spectrum in the home network bandwidth 226. In this manner, the pass band filter portion 254 is a low pass filter. In one embodiment, the pass band filter portion 254 is a parallel inductor/capacitor (LC) arrangement in which inductors L1 and L6 increase the isolation of the low pass filter. Resonator or tank elements 256a-256d defined by L2/C2, L3/C3, L4/C4, and L5/C5 and capacitive shunts C1, C6, C7, C8, and C9 collectively form an elliptic filter. Other filter designs, such as Butterworth, are equally operable but may require additional components to implement.
The filter circuit 242 further includes a multipath interference mitigation leg 258 operatively branched to ground from the signal path 244. The multipath interference mitigation leg 258 includes capacitors C10-C15 and inductors L7 and L8. The multipath interference mitigation leg 258 is configured to increase the return loss in the home network bandwidth. In the embodiment shown in
One advantage provided by the present invention is that home network multipath distortions at the filter port connections are minimized or even eliminated, thereby enhancing signal quality. Prior art filters designed for the MoCA standard, for example, generated significant multipath distortions from the poor return loss (typically less than 1 dB) produced from the filter's stop band.
Many modifications and other embodiments of the inventions set forth herein will come to mind to one skilled in the art to which these inventions pertain having the benefit of the teachings presented in the foregoing descriptions and the associated drawings. Therefore, it is to be understood that the inventions are not to be limited to the specific embodiments disclosed and that modifications and other embodiments are intended to be included within the scope of the appended claims. For example, although the embodiments disclosed herein comprise analog circuits, the inventors contemplate digital circuitry could be utilized without departing from the scope of the invention. Further, although specific terms are employed herein, they are used in a generic and descriptive sense only and not for purposes of limitation.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/937,239, filed Mar. 27, 2018, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,284,162, issued May 7, 2019, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/049,805, filed Feb. 22, 2016, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,979,373, issued May 22, 2018, which is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/918,639, filed Jun. 14, 2013, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,306,530, issued Apr. 5, 2016, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/697,589, filed Feb. 1, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,487,717, issued Jul. 16, 2013, by Erdogan Akan and Raymond W. Palinkas and entitled “Multipath Mitigation Circuit for Home Network”, which is incorporated entirely herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2260494 | Dante | Oct 1941 | A |
2662217 | Roberts | Dec 1953 | A |
3790909 | LeFevre | Feb 1974 | A |
3939431 | Cohlman | Feb 1976 | A |
4003005 | Mukherjee et al. | Jan 1977 | A |
4027219 | Van Alphen et al. | May 1977 | A |
4306403 | Hubbard et al. | Dec 1981 | A |
4344499 | Van der Lely et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
4512033 | Schrock | Apr 1985 | A |
4520508 | Reichert, Jr. | May 1985 | A |
4648123 | Schrock | Mar 1987 | A |
4677390 | Wagner | Jun 1987 | A |
4715012 | Mueller, Jr. | Dec 1987 | A |
4961218 | Kiko | Oct 1990 | A |
4982440 | Dufresne et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5010399 | Goodman et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5126686 | Tam | Jun 1992 | A |
5126840 | Dufresne et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5214505 | Rabowsky et al. | May 1993 | A |
5231660 | West, Jr. | Jul 1993 | A |
5245300 | Sasaki et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5369642 | Shioka et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5485630 | Lee et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5548255 | Spielman | Aug 1996 | A |
5557319 | Gurusami et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5557510 | McIntyre et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5604528 | Edwards et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5719792 | Bush | Feb 1998 | A |
5740044 | Ehrenhardt et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5745836 | Williams | Apr 1998 | A |
5745838 | Tresness et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5815794 | Williams | Sep 1998 | A |
5839052 | Dean et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5893024 | Sanders et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5937330 | Vince et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5950111 | Georger et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5970053 | Schick et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6012271 | Wilkens et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6014547 | Caporizzo et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6031432 | Schreuders | Feb 2000 | A |
6049693 | Baran et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6069960 | Mizukami et al. | May 2000 | A |
6094211 | Baran et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6101932 | Wilkens | Aug 2000 | A |
6128040 | Shinbori et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6129187 | Bellanger et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6173225 | Stelzle et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6185432 | Vembu | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6205138 | Nihal et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6229375 | Koen | May 2001 | B1 |
6321384 | Eldering | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6348837 | Ibelings | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6348955 | Tait | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6373349 | Gilbert | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6377316 | Mycynek et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6388539 | Rice | May 2002 | B1 |
6425132 | Chappell | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6430904 | Coers et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6495998 | Terreault | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6498925 | Tauchi | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6510152 | Gerszberg et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6546705 | Scarlett et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6550063 | Matsuura | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6560778 | Hasegawa | May 2003 | B1 |
6570928 | Shibata | May 2003 | B1 |
6587012 | Farmer et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6622304 | Carhart | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6640338 | Shibata | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6678893 | Jung | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6683513 | Shamsaifar et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6725462 | Kaplan | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6728968 | Abe et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6737935 | Shafer | May 2004 | B1 |
6757910 | Bianu | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6758292 | Shoemaker | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6804828 | Shibata | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6843044 | Clauss | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6845232 | Darabi | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6920614 | Schindler et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6868552 | Masuda et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6877166 | Roeck et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6928175 | Bader et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6942595 | Hrazdera | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7003275 | Petrovic | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7029293 | Shapson et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7039432 | Stater et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7048106 | Hou | May 2006 | B2 |
7127734 | Amit | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7162731 | Reidhead et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7254827 | Terreault | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7283479 | Ljungdahl et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7399255 | Johnson et al. | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7404355 | Viaud et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7416068 | Ray et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7454252 | El-Sayed | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7464526 | Coenen | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7505819 | El-Sayed | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7508284 | Shafer | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7530091 | Vaughan | May 2009 | B2 |
7592883 | Shafer | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7675381 | Lin | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7742777 | Strater et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7783195 | Riggsby | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7952451 | Beerwerth | May 2011 | B2 |
8179814 | Shafer et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8487717 | Alkan | Jul 2013 | B2 |
9306530 | Alkan et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9979373 | Alkan | May 2018 | B2 |
20010016950 | Matsuura | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20020084871 | Fallahi | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020141347 | Harp et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020144292 | Uemura et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020166124 | Gurantz et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020174423 | Fifield et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030084458 | Ljungdahl et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20040147273 | Morphy | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040172659 | Ljungdahl et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040229561 | Cowley et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050034168 | Beveridge | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050047051 | Marland | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050144649 | Bertonis | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050183130 | Sadja et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050210977 | Yan | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050283815 | Brooks et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050289632 | Brooks et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060015921 | Vaughan | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060041918 | Currivan et al. | Feb 2006 | A9 |
20060191359 | Tarasinski et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060205442 | Phillips et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060241838 | Mongiardo et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060282871 | Yo | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070024393 | Forse et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070288981 | Mitsuse et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070288982 | Donahue | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080001645 | Kuroki | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080022344 | Riggsby | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080040764 | Weinstein et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080120667 | Zaltsman | May 2008 | A1 |
20080127287 | Alkan et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080157898 | Palinkas et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080168518 | Hsue et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080247401 | Bhal et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080247541 | Cholas et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080271094 | Kliger et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080313691 | Cholas et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090031391 | Urbanek | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090047917 | Philips et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090047919 | Phillips et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090077608 | Romerein et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090153263 | Lin | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090165070 | McMullin et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090180782 | Bernard et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090217325 | Kliger et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090320086 | Rijssemus et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100017842 | Wells | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100095344 | Newby | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100100918 | Egan | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100125877 | Wells | May 2010 | A1 |
20100146564 | Halik | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100162340 | Riggsby | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100194489 | Kearns et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100225813 | Hirono et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110010749 | Alkan | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110051014 | Wang et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110069740 | Cowley et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110072472 | Wells | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110181371 | Alkan | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110258677 | Shafer | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120054805 | Shafer | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120054819 | Alkan | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120081190 | Rijssemus | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120159556 | Alkan | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120331501 | Shafer | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130081096 | Wells et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
55-80989 | Jun 1980 | JP |
55-132126 | Oct 1980 | JP |
58-99913 | Dec 1981 | JP |
57-091055 | Jun 1982 | JP |
58-101582 | Jun 1983 | JP |
59026709 | Aug 1984 | JP |
S1-157035 | Jul 1986 | JP |
05-191416 | Jul 1993 | JP |
07-038580 | Feb 1995 | JP |
11-069334 | Mar 1999 | JP |
2001-177580 | Jun 2001 | JP |
2004-080483 | Mar 2004 | JP |
2005-005875 | Jan 2005 | JP |
2007-166109 | Jun 2007 | JP |
2007-166110 | Jun 2007 | JP |
0024124 | Apr 2000 | WO |
0172005 | Sep 2001 | WO |
0233969 | Apr 2002 | WO |
02091676 | Nov 2002 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Coil craft article, “Inductors as RF Chokes”, document 945-2 Revised Apr. 13, 2011 (Year: 2011). |
Author Unknown, International Search Report dated May 31, 2011, PCT Application No. PCT/US2010/049568, filed Sep. 21, 2010. |
Wells, “Cable Television Entry Adapter”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/245,510, filed Sep. 26, 2011. |
Author Unknown, Office Action Summary dated Mar. 6, 2012, U.S. Appl. No. 12/563,719, filed Sep. 21, 2009. |
Author Unknown, Office Action Summary dated Jan. 23, 2012, U.S. Appl. No. 12/250,229, filed Oct. 13, 2008. |
Author Unknown, Office Action Summary dated Nov. 11, 2011, U.S. Appl. No. 12/255,008, filed Oct. 21, 2008. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190222190 A1 | Jul 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13918639 | Jun 2013 | US |
Child | 15049805 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15937239 | Mar 2018 | US |
Child | 16359335 | US | |
Parent | 15049805 | Feb 2016 | US |
Child | 15937239 | US | |
Parent | 12697589 | Feb 2010 | US |
Child | 13918639 | US |