Field of the Invention
The invention relates to a filter configuration for vapor extraction hoods for the separation of particles and/or liquid droplets, which are used, in particular, in kitchens above a cooking are.
Filter configurations of this type are known. German Patent DE 27 20 201 C2 and U.S. Pat. No. 3,910,782 describe filters which are formed of a first row of profiles disposed at distances from one another and open in the direction of the gas flow and of a second row of profiles disposed at distances from one another and open opposite to the direction of the gas flow. The mutually adjacent longitudinal edges of two profiles of one row that lie next to one another projecting in each case into the inner space of an opposite profile of the other row.
In these separation grids, the distance between the two profile rows is dimensioned such that the air flowing through experiences a multiple reversal of direction. The free passage cross section amounts to 30% of the total grid area, depending on the separation grid-type 10. An increase in the air velocity of 3-10 times occurs within the separation grid due to the reduction in cross section. The separating action of the grid is based on this velocity increase, as a result of which the liquid droplets and solid particles contained in the air are of course also accelerated, and on the multiple reversal of direction of the air flowing through. The accelerated liquid droplets and solid particles cannot follow the direction change and impinge on to the inner surface of the profiles of the second row. On the surface of these, the liquid droplets form a liquid film that gradually runs off downward and passes through special orifices in the frame of the separation grid into a collecting rail disposed under the separation grid.
German Utility Model DE 298 11 000 U1 proposes a grease trap filter which makes use of two or more layers of a grid which are formed of slotted bridges produced on both sides of a metal sheet by a stamping operation, the grids being disposed within the filter in such a way that the slotted bridges run vertically or obliquely downward and the grids are held together by a common frame. A further grid, the slotted bridges of which are disposed horizontally, may be located in each case between two grids having slotted bridges running vertically or obliquely downward.
Furthermore, grease filters formed of multilayer expanded metal are known. Thus, Published, Non-Prosecuted German Patent Application DE 197 53 687 A1 describes a multilayer conically configured expanded-metal filter which has on the outside an integrally formed planar circular disk ring for good bearing against the filter frame.
An essential disadvantage of these plate-shaped or conically configured grease filters, in which the air, usually sucked in by a blower, flows through the plate plane, is the reduced edge suction extraction.
In order to eliminate this disadvantage, it has already been proposed in Published, Non-Prosecuted German Patent Application DE 41 38 846 A1, in a filter cartridge, via the filter surface of which the air to be filtered is sucked in, to divide the filter surface into subregions through which air flows and which inhibit the through flow. In this case, for the purpose of improved edge suction extraction, there is provision for the subregions which inhibit the through flow, to increase toward the center of the filter surface. This has the disadvantage, of course, that the overall filter surface is restricted in favor of flow optimization.
Furthermore, transverse-through flow plate-shaped separators for separating liquids from a gas stream, in particular an oil mist, are known from the industrial sector, and in these vortex elements, what are known as X-shaped vortex elements, are used, which bring about a deflection of the gas stream and consequently liquid separation (see German Patent DE 41 31 988 C2). Transverse-through flow plate-shaped separators of this type are not suitable for use in commercial kitchens or in domestic vapor extraction hoods.
It is accordingly an object of the invention to provide a filter configuration for a vapor extraction hood which overcomes the above-mentioned disadvantages of the prior art devices of this general type, in which air flows through a filter plane and which has improved edge suction extraction.
With the foregoing and other objects in view there is provided, in accordance with the invention, a filter configuration for a vapor extraction hood for separating particles and/or liquid droplets from air flowing through the filter configuration. The filter configuration contains at least one filter ply disposed in one plane and an edge filter disposed in at least one edge region of the filter ply. The edge filter is formed as a vortex separator.
According to the invention, the filter configuration is provided for the separation of particles and/or liquid droplets from the air flowing through the filter configuration. The filter configuration has at least one filter ply disposed in one plane and of an edge filter which is disposed in the edge region of the filter ply. The edge filter is preferably provided with a device that, in comparison with the filter ply, brings about an increased flow velocity and more pronounced swirling.
As is known from the prior art, the filter ply may be formed of one or more layers of an expanded metal and/or a nonwoven material and/or paper, the edge filter being constructed as a swirling stream filter, as a baffle filter and/or as an expanded-metal, nonwoven or paper filter.
By this configuration of a vortex separator, through which the flow passes transversely, markedly improved edge suction extraction can be achieved. It is advantageous, in this case, if the flow resistance of the edge filter is lower than the flow resistance of the filter ply, since fumes in the edge region of the filter configuration are thereby prevented from leaving the edge region. Moreover, the higher flow velocities resulting from the lower flow resistance intensifies the swirling. As a result, the particles or liquid droplets are separated more effectively in the edge filter, particularly when the edge filter is configured as a vortex filter or as a baffle filter.
The edge filter, configured as a vortex separator, has at least one, preferably two rows of devices, disposed one behind the other, for the formation of vortices in the air flowing through the vortex separator. Since, for example, a vapor extraction hood has a peripheral edge, it is advantageous if the entire edge also receives peripheral edge suction extraction, in order to prevent fumes from leaving the suction region of the vapor extraction hood. It is therefore advantageous if edge filters are disposed peripherally in the edge region of the filter ply.
Furthermore, one refinement of the invention provides for the edge filter to be disposed on the edge region preferably perpendicularly to the plane of the filter ply, in such a way that liquid droplets separated in the edge filter flow into the edge region of the filter ply and are absorbed there.
If the filter ply, that has one or more layers of expanded metal and/or nonwoven material and/or paper, is bordered by a U-shaped frame, a further advantageous refinement of the invention provides for the upper frame leg to be of a prolonged configuration, in order to receive the edge filter. So that liquid droplets separated in the edge filter can be diverted here, too, in a preferred version the frame has orifices in the region of the edge filter disposed on it.
What has proved appropriate as an edge filter is a vortex separator that possesses a row of X-shaped vortex elements, preferably two rows of X-shaped vortex elements disposed one behind the other. In the case of two rows of X-shaped vortex elements disposed one behind the other, their curved legs engage one into the other so as to maintain an air gap. When the flow passes transversely through the X-shaped vortex elements thus disposed, vortices are formed, so that the particles and/or liquid droplets contained in the air are thrown against the walls of the legs and are separated.
In a further advantageous version, there is provision for the filter ply, together with the edge filter, or the filter ply, together with the vortex separator and the frame, to form the cartridge filter.
The filter configuration per se and, in particular, in the construction as a cartridge can preferably be used in the suction-extraction orifice of a vapor extraction hood or chimney which has an air conveying device for the suction-extraction of air via the suction-extraction orifice. Furthermore, the cartridge may be disposed exchangeably and is therefore additionally service-friendly.
Moreover, the filter configuration affords the possibility of arranging on the edge filter a screen which extends radially outward beyond the edge of the filter configuration, in order to guide fumes and vapors toward the filter configuration, in particular toward the edge filter.
In another exemplary embodiment of the vortex separator configured as an edge filter, horizontal curved elements are used, the elements being placed at the edge of the filter configuration in such a way that the inflowing air first impinges on to a streamlined shape. When the air runs further on through the vortex separator, it is deflected at least by a further curved element.
In a first refinement of the curved element, this has a C-shaped configuration. The convex “back” of the C-shape is assigned to the filter edge. Free legs of a further C-shaped curved element engage into the concave “orifice” of the C-shape. A sharp deflection of the air stream thereby takes place, with the result that grease or water droplets are precipitated on the surface of the water separator.
Further configurations of the curved element are V-shaped, S-shaped, drop-shaped or dumbbell-shaped. These are dealt with in more detail within the scope of the description. According to the invention, the vortex separator may also be formed of a combination of at least two different shapes.
When a multiplicity of curved elements have to be mounted, it is disadvantageous if these elements have to be mounted individually. It is therefore advantageous if the curved elements are disposed on a common base plate. This base plate may be located both above and below the curved elements. It is advantageous, however, if the base plates are disposed at the bottom, because residues of the grease or water condensate running off from the curved elements lie on the base plate which is then delivered in one piece with the curved elements to a cleaning process, for example in a dishwasher.
It is also advantageous if the base plate extends along the edge of the filter ply. By virtue of this configuration, the condensate and grease separated by the edge filter can run off via the base plate and be sucked up or bound by the filter ply. It is advantageous, in this case, if the base plate is inclined toward the filter ply. If the base plate is not inclined, the condensate does not necessarily run from the edge of the filter configuration, because the air stream constantly sucks the condensate toward the center of the filter.
The curved elements are not only limited on one side by the base plate, but are assigned a further plate on the other side. These two plates together form a duct. It is advantageous if, as seen in the flow direction, the two plates form a widening gap, because these plates then produce a nozzle. This nozzle shape intensifies the condensation of grease and water.
It is advantageous if the vortex separator, together with the curved elements, is produced by injection molding. This entails low costs in terms of mass production despite the complex configuration of the vortex separator. Production from plastic is particularly cost-effective. However, a vortex separator produced from light metal by injection molding is also suitable for mass production. Moreover, it is more resistant to cleaning that, if appropriate, is aggressive, than a vortex separator made from plastic. Aluminum has proved particularly suitable as material for the production of a vortex separator from light metal.
If an edge filter is disposed at least on one longitudinal side of a filter ply, the edge filter may also at the same time replace this part of the filter ply frame. This avoids the need for a material for this frame part.
In another refinement of the vortex separator, the latter is part of a vapor extraction hood. Owing to this structural proximity to the vapor extraction hood, a multiplicity of functions can be organized more conveniently. This is dealt with again in the further part of the description.
As already stated, the edge filter, preferably configured as a vortex separator, is located in the edge region of the filter configuration. As also already mentioned, it is important that precisely the edge region of a filter configuration is subjected to an effective suction, so that stray vapor fumes could not leave its effective range. It is therefore advantageous if the edge filter has a downwardly directed inflow orifice.
An edge filter that, when exposed, faces the vapor fumes, may possibly impede handling during cooking. It is therefore advantageous if the edge filter has a swing-out configuration, so that it is extended only as required. It is advantageous, furthermore, if the edge filter is configured to be capable of being connected and disconnected, because, if fumes occur to only a slight extent, suction through the middle filter ply may possibly be sufficient. Energy costs can thereby be saved. This connectability and disconnectability may take place manually in a simple way. It is also possible, however, that it is implemented automatically. The automatic mechanism necessary for this purpose is controlled by a sensor that may be configured as a pressure sensor.
Since the edge filter may be severely polluted, it is advantageous if it is easily demountable. This may take place, for example, by a simple plugging or latching connection.
In addition to the embodiments of the vortex separator configured as an edge filter, an X-shaped vortex element or horizontal curved elements, there is, according to the invention, also an edge filter formed of expanded metal. Expanded metal is known in many different embodiments, also from the field of kitchen filters. However, so that a vortex separator formed of expanded metal fulfills the condition of low flow resistance for the edge region of the filter ply, the expanded metal must be configured to be markedly more air-permeable here than a filter ply. What is important in this refinement is that the condensate can pass from the expanded metal toward the filter ply. For this reason, in a vortex separator formed of expanded metal, the surface of the expanded metal is inclined toward the filter ply.
In a refinement of the invention, the expanded metal of the edge filter and the expanded metal of the filter ply are produced in one piece. In order to ensure the air permeability of the edge filter, the expanded metal in the region of the edge filter is formed, if appropriate, of only a single ply of expanded metal.
However, the expanded metal for the edge filter may also be a separate component. This has the advantage that the edge filter is a less bulky component and is therefore easier to handle during cleaning.
Although, in the case of an edge filter formed of expanded metal, there is no need for any notable shapes, as, for example, with the curved elements, it is nevertheless advantageous if the edge filter is surrounded by a component produced by injection molding. This advantage becomes apparent when, for example, the elongate “housing” of an edge filter is produced from an extruded material, the cross section of the material thus being constant over its entire length. If, for example, a local material variance is required, as seen over the length of the material, it is not possible with an extruded material. However, for example, a bore or a nozzle bead can be produced by injection molding.
Extruded profiles that border an edge filter in the longitudinal direction can be held in their desired position in a simple way by flaps attached on the end faces. For this purpose, the flaps have corresponding recesses on the side facing the extruded profiles.
Occasionally, it may happen that the edge filter preferably produced from expanded metal loses condensate drops before they have reached the filter ply. It is then advantageous, here, if the inflow orifice for the fumes is provided with an inner edge on the underside of the edge suction. As a result, the drops cannot flow back through the inflow orifice. This edging additionally has the advantage that the inflow orifice thereby becomes a nozzle that assists the condensation of the fumes.
The effect of the more intensive edge suction may also be reinforced by arranging next to one another at least two filter plies, each with at least one edge suction. This results in alternating fields of strong and of moderated suction.
In regions where there is a pronounced occurrence of fumes, for example in large kitchens or in otherwise intensive kitchen utilization, it may be advantageous if a collecting gutter is provided in the vapor extraction hood on account of the increased condensate formation. The collected condensate then either can evaporate again in the case of a lower occurrence of condensate or is discharged by an emptying facility.
Other features which are considered as characteristic for the invention are set forth in the appended claims.
Although the invention is illustrated and described herein as embodied in a filter configuration for a vapor extraction hood, it is nevertheless not intended to be limited to the details shown, since various modifications and structural changes may be made therein without departing from the spirit of the invention and within the scope and range of equivalents of the claims.
The construction and method of operation of the invention, however, together with additional objects and advantages thereof will be best understood from the following description of specific embodiments when read in connection with the accompanying drawings.
Referring now to the figures of the drawing in detail and first, particularly, to
The filter configuration 1 is configured in such a way that the flow resistance of the vortex separator 6 configured as an edge filter 6 is lower than the flow resistance of the filter ply 3, with the result that good edge suction extraction is achieved.
This is additionally assisted by a screen which is disposed on the vortex separator 6 and which extends radially outward beyond the edge of the filter configuration 1 and guides fumes and vapors toward the filter configuration 1, in particular toward the vortex separator 6.
The rows of X-shaped vortex elements 7, 8 which form the vortex separator 6 are disposed on the edge region 4 and perpendicularly to the plane of the filter ply 3, in such a way that separated liquid droplets flow into the edge region 4 of the filter ply 3 and can be absorbed there.
In the version illustrated in
If the X-shaped vortex elements 7, 8 are merely placed onto the filter ply 3 without fixing, they could slip out of place and the gap between their legs 7.1 and 8.1 would have an undefined geometry. It is therefore advantageous that the frame 5 is adjacent to the X-shaped vortex elements 7, 8 and therefore affords the possibility of connecting the X-shaped vortex elements 7, 8 to the frame 5. This is advantageously carried out by fastening.
It is shown, furthermore, that the frame 5 possesses, in the region of the X-shaped vortex elements 7, 8 disposed on it, orifices 9 for diverting the liquid running off from the X-shaped vortex elements 7, 8.
The proposed filter configuration 1 is suitable particularly for the separation of grease and grease droplets or of water and water droplets from the air flowing through the filter configuration 1, but is not restricted to these.
The elements of
The edge filter 6 may have a swing-out configuration. It can thus be swung out, as required, and, in the state in which it is not being used, does not disturb the appearance of the appliance.
The edge filter 6 may be provided with a non-illustrated closing device. The edge suction extraction or the edge filter 6 can be connected, as required. This results in two operating states, on the one hand, suction extraction only via the filter ply 3 and, on the other hand, suction extraction via the filter ply 3 and the edge filter 6. The connection and disconnection of the edge filter may be carried out by hand actuation or manually and/or automatically or by motor, preferably via a non-illustrated flap or a non-illustrated slide which may be disposed upstream or downstream of the edge filter.
Automatic connection and disconnection of the edge filter 6 may be controlled by a sensor configuration, preferably as a function of the air quantity to be purified.
The connectability and disconnectability of the edge filter 6 may take place automatically, preferably in that a non-illustrated spring-prestressed flap is provided, which opens and closes automatically as a function of the pressure difference between the outside of the filter configuration (upstream) and the vacuum side of the filter configuration (downstream), preferably as a function of the selected blower stage. A flap of this type may also be designated as a dynamic pressure flap.
For further addition, then,
FIGS. 10 to 13, then, explain a further structural solution for the edge filter 6. This is an edge filter 6 with at least one expanded-metal ply.
A filter ply 3 with a regular number of plies can be seen on the left in
The edge filter 6 is disposed in a housing 21. The housing 21 is illustrated in one part and as a plastic injection molding in
In
An assembled edge filter 6 can be seen in cross section in
The low part 24 is illustrated as being inclined outward. As a result, fumes building up under the filter ply 3 of the vapor extraction hood 2 are prevented from leaving the suction extraction region of the latter. It is then also advantageous, here, that the inflow orifice 16 faces this build-up region.
A vapor extraction hood 2 with three filter elements disposed next to one another and in the form of a pyramid frustum can be seen in
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
102 08 474.2 | Feb 2002 | DE | national |
This application is a continuation, under 35 U.S.C. § 120, of copending international application No. PCT/EP03/01343, filed Feb. 11, 2003, which designated the United States; this application also claims the priority, under 35 U.S.C. § 119, of German patent application No. 102 08 474.2, filed Feb. 27, 2002; the prior applications are herewith incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | PCT/EP03/01343 | Feb 2003 | US |
Child | 10928304 | Aug 2004 | US |