The present invention relates to composite filter devices.
In the related art, composite filter devices are widely used in cellular phones and or the like.
For example, Japanese Unexamined Patent Application Publication No. 2013-62556 described below discloses a multiplexer including three or more bandpass filters. In the multiplexer of Japanese Unexamined Patent Application Publication No. 2013-62556, these three or more bandpass filters are commonly connected to an antenna terminal.
In the multiplexer of Japanese Unexamined Patent Application Publication No. 2013-62556, however, the conductance component of each bandpass filter causes an increase in insertion loss of another bandpass filter that shares the common connection. To reduce the insertion loss, it is conceivable to use LiNbO3 substrates with low loss as piezoelectric substrates for all of the bandpass filters. However, when LiNbO3 is used, there arises a problem of higher cost.
Preferred embodiments of the present invention provide low-cost composite filter devices with lower insertion loss.
A composite filter device according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention includes a first filter, and a plurality of second filters having different passbands, wherein one end portions of the first filter and the plurality of second filters are connected to a common connection, the first filter includes a piezoelectric substrate made of LiNbO3, an IDT electrode provided on the piezoelectric substrate, and a dielectric layer provided on the piezoelectric substrate so as to cover the IDT electrode, the first filter generates a fundamental wave of Rayleigh waves, and a passband of the first filter is in a frequency band that is lower than any of the passbands of the plurality of second filters.
In a composite filter device according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the composite filter device further includes an antenna terminal, and the one end portions of the first filter and the plurality of second filters are connected in common to the antenna terminal.
In a composite filter device according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the piezoelectric substrate of the first filter is preferably made of a rotated Y-cut LiNbO3 with a cut angle between about 110° and about 150° inclusive, for example. In this case, the fundamental wave of Rayleigh waves may be appropriately utilized.
In a composite filter device according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the IDT electrode preferably includes a metal layer made of a metal having a density higher than about 7.87×103 kg/m3, for example. In this case, the first filter is able to reduce bulk wave emission across a wide range.
In a composite filter device according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the metal layer of the IDT electrode is preferably made of at least one kind of metal, out of Cu, Fe, Mo, Pt, W, Pd, Ta, Au, and Ag, for example. In this case, the first filter is able to reduce the bulk wave emission across a wide range.
In a composite filter device according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the passbands of the plurality of second filters are preferably in frequency bands that are lower than the frequency of a longitudinal wave of Rayleigh waves of the first filter. In this case, insertion loss is effectively reduced.
In a composite filter device according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the passbands of the plurality of second filters are preferably in frequency bands that satisfy the following Formula (1), where h is the thickness of the IDT electrode, ρ is the density of the IDT electrode, λ is a wavelength determined by the IDT electrode, f is a center frequency of the passband of the first filter, x is ρ×h/λ, and y is a frequency normalized by f.
1<y<2.392×10−4×x+1.6246 Formula (1)
In this case, the insertion loss is effectively reduced.
In a composite filter device according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the passbands of the plurality of second filters are preferably in frequency bands that are lower than the frequency of a fast transverse wave of Rayleigh waves of the first filter. In this case, the insertion loss is effectively reduced.
In a composite filter device according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the passbands of the plurality of second filters are preferably in frequency bands that satisfy the following Formula (2).
1<y<1.7358×10−4×x+1.1781 Formula (2)
In this case, the insertion loss is effectively reduced.
In a composite filter device according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the passbands of the plurality of second filters are preferably in frequency bands that are higher than the frequency of a fast transverse wave of Rayleigh waves of the first filter. In this case, the insertion loss is effectively reduced.
In a composite filter device according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the passbands of the plurality of second filters are preferably in frequency bands that satisfy the following Formula (3).
2.0032×10−4×x+1.2138<y<2.392×10−4×x+1.6246 Formula (3)
In this case, the insertion loss is effectively reduced.
In a composite filter device according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention, of the plurality of second filters, the passband of at least one of the plurality of second filters is preferably in a frequency band that is lower than the frequency of a fast transverse wave of Rayleigh waves of the first filter, and the passband of a remaining one of the plurality of second filters is preferably in a frequency band that is higher than the frequency of the fast transverse wave of Rayleigh waves of the first filter. In this case, the insertion loss is effectively reduced.
In a composite filter device according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the passband of at least one of the plurality of second filters is preferably in a frequency band that satisfies the following Formula (2):
1<y<1.7358×10−4×x+1.1781 Formula (2)
The passband of a remaining one of the plurality of second filters is preferably in a frequency band that satisfies the following Formula (3):
2.0032×10−4×x+1.2138<y<2.392×10−4×x+1.6246 Formula (3)
In this case, the insertion loss is effectively reduced.
In a composite filter device according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention, at least one second filter of the plurality of second filters preferably includes a piezoelectric substrate made of LiTaO3. In this case, the insertion loss and cost is reduced.
According to various preferred embodiments of the present invention, low-cost composite filter devices with lower insertion loss are provided.
The above and other elements, features, steps, characteristics and advantages of the present invention will become more apparent from the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments with reference to the attached drawings.
Hereinafter, the present invention will be disclosed in detail by describing specific preferred embodiments of the present invention with reference to the drawings.
Each preferred embodiment described in the present specification is for illustrative purposes only, and elements or features of different preferred embodiments may be combined or partially exchanged.
A composite filter device 1 includes a first filter 2 and a plurality of second filters 12A and 12B with different passbands. The number of the plurality of second filters 12A and 12B is not limited to any particular value.
The composite filter device 1 further includes an antenna terminal 17. One end portions of the first filter 2 and the plurality of second filters 12A and 12B are commonly connected to the antenna terminal 17.
The first filter 2 is preferably a ladder filter. The first filter 2 includes an input terminal 2a and an output terminal 2b. First to fourth series arm resonators S1 to S4 are connected between the input terminal 2a and the output terminal 2b. A first parallel arm resonator P1 is connected between a ground potential and a connection point between the first series arm resonator S1 and the second series arm resonator S2. A second parallel arm resonator P2 is connected between the ground potential and a connection point between the second series arm resonator S2 and the third series arm resonator S3. A third parallel arm resonator P3 is connected between the ground potential and a connection point between the third series arm resonator S3 and the fourth series arm resonator S4. A fourth parallel arm resonator P4 is connected between the ground potential and a connection point between the fourth series arm resonator S4 and the output terminal 2b. The circuit configuration of the first filter 2 is not limited to the configuration described above. The first to fourth series arm resonators S1 to S4 and the first to fourth parallel arm resonators P1 to P4 are each preferably defined by an elastic surface acoustic wave resonator.
The first series arm resonator S1 includes a piezoelectric substrate 3. The piezoelectric substrate 3 is preferably made of a rotated Y-cut LiNbO3, for example. The first filter 2 utilizes a fundamental wave of Rayleigh wave. The cut angle of LiNbO3 of the piezoelectric substrate 3 is not limited to any particular angle as long as the fundamental wave of Rayleigh waves can be utilized, and is preferably between about 110° and about 150° inclusive, for example. More preferably, the cut angle of LiNbO3 of the piezoelectric substrate 3 preferably is between about 126° and about 130° inclusive, for example.
An interdigital (IDT) electrode 4 is provided on the piezoelectric substrate 3. Reflectors 5 are provided on both sides of the IDT electrode 4 along an elastic surface acoustic wave propagation direction. The IDT electrode 4 preferably includes a metal layer made of Pt, for example. The IDT electrode 4 is preferably made of a dense metal. This enables better excitation of the fundamental wave of Rayleigh wave. The IDT electrode 4 preferably includes a metal layer made of a metal whose density p is higher than about 7.87×103 kg/m3. For example, the IDT electrode 4 preferably includes a metal layer made of at least one metal out of Cu, Fe, Mo, Pt, W, Pd, Ta, Au, and Ag.
As in a modified example shown in
Returning to
The second to fourth series arm resonators S2 to S4 and the first to fourth parallel arm resonators P1 to P4 each have a configuration that is the same as or similar to that of the first series arm resonator S1 and are provided on the same piezoelectric substrate 3. The first to fourth series arm resonators S1 to S4 and the first to fourth parallel arm resonators P1 to P4 have suitable thicknesses of IDT electrode and suitable electrode finger distances of IDT electrode, and define the first filter 2 depicted in
The plurality of second filters 12A and 12B in the present preferred embodiment are also ladder filters each including a plurality of elastic surface acoustic wave resonators.
An elastic surface acoustic wave resonator included in the second filter 12A includes a piezoelectric substrate 13 preferably made of LiTaO3 and utilizes Leaky waves. Alternatively, the elastic surface acoustic wave resonator described above may include a piezoelectric substrate made of a single piezoelectric crystal other than LiTaO3 or piezoelectric ceramics or other suitable materials.
An elastic surface acoustic wave resonator included in the second filter 12B has a structure that is the same as or similar to that of the elastic surface acoustic wave resonator included in the second filter 12A.
The passband of the first filter 2 is in a frequency band that is lower than any of the passbands of the plurality of second filters 12A and 12B.
It can be seen that the intensity of Rayleigh wave greatly changes at frequencies represented by dash lines A, B, D, and E. The frequencies represented by dash lines A and B correspond to a resonant frequency and an anti-resonant frequency of the first series arm resonator S1 depicted in
In the present preferred embodiment, the passbands of the plurality of second filters 12A and 12B shown in
It can be seen that the phase of Rayleigh wave greatly changes at the frequency of the fast transverse wave and the frequency of the longitudinal wave, which are represented by dash lines D and E. Furthermore, it can be seen that the phase of Rayleigh wave also greatly changes at a frequency band higher the frequency of the longitudinal wave. A larger phase change means a higher bulk wave emission. That is, the bulk wave emission of Rayleigh waves is higher at a frequency band equal to or higher than the frequency of the fast transverse wave and the frequency of the longitudinal wave. In other words, the bulk wave emission of Rayleigh waves is lower as long as a frequency is equal to or less than the frequency of the longitudinal wave and is other than the frequency of the fast transverse wave. The same applies to bulk wave emissions of Rayleigh waves of other elastic surface acoustic wave resonators used in the first filter 2. In this manner, the first filter 2 is able to reduce the bulk wave emission across a wide range.
The bulk wave emission of a resonator included in a filter of the composite filter device reduces the conductance of another filter that shares the common connection. This increases the insertion loss. In composite filter devices of the related art, the conductance of each filter is reduced by bulk wave emissions of resonators used in a plurality of filters, thus increasing the insertion loss.
For example, in the related art, a composite filter device includes filters that use elastic surface acoustic wave resonators utilizing Leaky waves propagating LiTaO3 substrates or filters that use elastic surface acoustic wave resonators utilizing Love waves propagating LiNbO3 substrates. In the foregoing elastic surface acoustic wave resonators in the composite filter devices, the bulk wave emission is higher at a frequency band higher than the resonant frequency or at a frequency band higher than the frequency of the slow transverse wave. Accordingly, as the passband of a filter becomes higher, the insertion loss of the filter increases.
On the other hand, the first filter 2 according to the present preferred embodiment is able to reduce the bulk wave emission of Rayleigh waves in each elastic surface acoustic wave resonator as long as a frequency is equal to or less than the frequency of the longitudinal wave of Rayleigh waves of each elastic surface acoustic wave resonator included in the first filter 2 and is other than the frequency of the fast transverse wave thereof. The passbands of the plurality of second filters 12A and 12B are all lower than the frequencies of longitudinal waves of Rayleigh waves of the first to fourth series arm resonators S1 to S4 and the first to fourth parallel arm resonators P1 to P4, and are arranged in the frequency bands that are other than the frequencies of the fast transverse waves thereof. Therefore, the plurality of second filters 12A and 12B are less susceptible to the bulk wave emissions of the first to fourth series arm resonators S1 to S4 and the first to fourth parallel arm resonators P1 to P4. Accordingly, the insertion losses of the plurality of second filters 12A and 12B are able to be reduced effectively.
Furthermore, the plurality of second filters 12A and 12B each include a piezoelectric substrate made of LiTaO3 and utilize Leaky waves. The bulk wave emission of Leaky waves of an elastic surface acoustic wave resonator using the LiTaO3 substrate is extremely low at a frequency band lower than the resonant frequency of the elastic surface acoustic wave resonator.
In the present preferred embodiment, the passband of the first filter 2 is in a frequency band that is lower than any of the passbands of the plurality of second filters 12A and 12B. Accordingly, the insertion loss of the first filter 2 is also effectively reduced.
All of the piezoelectric substrates of the plurality of second filters 12A and 12B are preferably low-cost LiTaO3 substrates. Accordingly, the insertion losses of the first filter 2 and the plurality of second filters 12A and 12B are able to be reduced effectively, and the cost is able to be reduced as well.
As ρ×h/λ of the IDT electrode 4 of the first series arm resonator S1 shown in
X1 to X10 differ from each other only in the thickness of IDT electrode. The values of h/λ in X1 to X10 are respectively specified in the following Table 1.
As specified in Table 1, the value of h/λ is determined such that X1 has the smallest value of h/λ, and from X1 to X10, the value of h/λ increases sequentially. Here, the thickness of IDT electrode is the only difference among X1 to X10. Thus, the value of ρ×h/λ is also the smallest in X1, and from X1 to X10, the value of ρ×h/λ increases sequentially. As depicted in
When four metal layers 24a to 24d are included as in the modified example shown in
ρ×h/λ=ρ1×h1/λ+ρ2×h2/λ+ρ3×h3/λ+ρ4×h4/λ
Similarly, when the metal layer includes a plurality of layers, which is other than four layers, ρ×h/λ of IDT electrode may be obtained by calculating the product of the density and a normalized thickness, which is a thickness normalized by the wavelength of the first filter, of each metal layer and by calculating the sum of the foregoing products calculated for all the metal layers.
Each normalized frequency in the first series arm resonator S1 depicted in
As described above, the insertion loss is able to be effectively reduced by setting the passbands of the plurality of second filters 12A and 12B lower than any of the normalized frequencies of the longitudinal waves of Rayleigh waves of the first to fourth series arm resonators S1 to S4 and the first to fourth parallel arm resonators P1 to P4 used in the first filter 2, and by further setting these passbands of the plurality of second filters 12A and 12B in the frequency bands that are higher than the passband of the first filter 2. This condition is specified by the following Formula (1). Here, x is ρ×h/λ, and y is the normalized frequency that is normalized by the center frequency f of the passband of the first filter 2.
1<y<2.392×10−4×x+1.6246 Formula (1)
The insertion loss is able to be effectively reduced by arranging the passbands of the plurality of second filters 12A and 12B in frequency bands that satisfy the condition of Formula (1).
As described above, the insertion loss is able to be effectively reduced by setting the passbands of the plurality of second filters 12A and 12B lower than any of the normalized frequencies of the longitudinal waves of Rayleigh waves of the first to fourth series arm resonators S1 to S4 and the first to fourth parallel arm resonators P1 to P4 used in the first filter 2, and by further setting these passbands of the plurality of second filters 12A and 12B in the frequency bands that are different from the normalized frequency of the fast transverse wave. This condition is specified by the following Formula (2) and Formula (3). When the passbands of the plurality of second filters 12A and 12B are set in the frequency bands that are lower than any of the normalized frequencies of the fast transverse waves of the first to fourth series arm resonators S1 to S4 and the first to fourth parallel arm resonators P1 to P4, the condition is specified by the following Formula (2).
1<y<1.7358×10−4×x+1.1781 Formula (2)
When the passbands of the plurality of second filters 12A and 12B are set in the frequency bands that are higher than any of the normalized frequencies of the fast transverse waves of the first to fourth series arm resonators S1 to S4 and the first to fourth parallel arm resonators P1 to P4, the condition is specified by the following Formula (3).
2.0032×10−4×x+1.2138<y<2.392×10−4×x+1.6246 Formula (3)
All of the passbands of the second filters 12A and 12B may satisfy the condition of Formula (2) or all the passbands of the second filters 12A and 12B may satisfy the condition of Formula (3). Alternatively, of the plurality of second filters 12A and 12B, at least one second filter 12A may satisfy the condition of Formula (2), and the remaining second filter 12B may satisfy the condition of Formula (3). In any of the foregoing cases, the insertion loss is effectively reduced.
While preferred embodiments of the present invention have been described above, it is to be understood that variations and modifications will be apparent to those skilled in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of the present invention. The scope of the present invention, therefore, is to be determined solely by the following claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2015-001656 | Jan 2015 | JP | national |
This application claims the benefit of priority to Japanese Patent Application No. 2015-001656 filed on Jan. 7, 2015 and is a Continuation Application of PCT Application No. PCT/JP2016/050030 filed on Jan. 4, 2016. The entire contents of each application are hereby incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20120274417 | Kihara et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130229242 | Takata | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130300519 | Tamasaki et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140333392 | Tsuda | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150270824 | Sauer et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2012-186642 | Sep 2012 | JP |
2013-062556 | Apr 2013 | JP |
10-2012-0038889 | Apr 2012 | KR |
10-2013-0103607 | Sep 2013 | KR |
2012063516 | May 2012 | WO |
2012098816 | Jul 2012 | WO |
WO-2013118532 | Aug 2013 | WO |
2014075974 | May 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Official Communication issued in corresponding Korean Patent Application No. 10-2017-7018473, dated Jun. 4, 2018. |
Official Communication issued in International Patent Application No. PCT/JP2016/050030, dated Mar. 8, 2016. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170294897 A1 | Oct 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | PCT/JP2016/050030 | Jan 2016 | US |
Child | 15630985 | US |