The present invention relates generally to a layered filter media.
Allergy sufferers and those with respiratory conditions are often sensitive to particulate materials in the air. Vacuum cleaners and air cleaner filtration devices seek to remove particulate materials in homes and places of business, requiring filters to trap these particles. Without such filters, vacuum cleaners would simply re-circulate the particulate matter back into the air. Industrial dust collection equipment is required to remove greater proportions of smaller and smaller particles from process air streams due to increasingly stringent regulatory requirements. Gas turbine intake filtration systems also must remove quantities of very small particles as the presence of such particles can cause irreparable damage to turbine blades. The cleanliness of an environment, the health of its occupants, the effectiveness of industrial processes, the maintenance of industrial equipment, and the overall aesthetics of living require that submicron particulate materials be readily removed by filter from an air stream.
In order to achieve submicron particulate removal from air streams passing through such systems, inertial separators tend to simply place a physical barrier in the path of particulate material that is then knocked from the air stream into a collection bin. Paper bag dust collectors are simply filters based on paper filter technologies in a bag form. Such paper bags typically simply fit across the air stream for the purpose of separating particulate from the air stream.
Newer filters have been designed with a collection filter or a flat panel or cylindrical cartridges. In these applications, a HEPA filtering material is used. By definition, HEPA filters remove at least 99.97% of airborne particles 0.3 μm in diameter or larger. Because of their general reliability and high level of performance, HEPA filters are often used to minimize the release of radioactive materials, asbestos, lead, beryllium, and other toxic particulates. In vacuum cleaners, HEPA filters are used for air pollution control. Often HEPA structures include an expanded PTFE (ePTFE), layer with a layer of a melt blown fiber combined in a filter construction, or a cellulose filter paper layer with a layer of melt blown fiber combined in a filter construction. These structures are often cleaned by rapping the filter or by blowing filter cake or particulate from the filter using compressed air streams.
The filtration efficiency and cleanability of newer filters is important. These filters must be able to remove dust and dirt but must be easily cleanable without damage to the filter. Often cleaning dirty filters by rapping the filter on a solid object to dislodge dust and dirt can cause the filter media to fail or can cause multilayered elements to delaminate, thus causing the filter to fail through the formation of a pathway for the dust and dirt through the filter structure. Another failure mode occurs when fine dust particles are trapped into the depth of the filter media, such that the dust cannot be dislodged by typical filter cleaning mechanisms, resulting in reduced vacuum power and shorter filter life.
One example of a dust filter vacuum technology using a fine fiber layer in a vacuum bag is Emig et al., U.S. Pat. No. 6,395,046. One example of a filter cartridge in a wet/dry vacuum using expanded PTFE is Scanlon et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,783,086. Filter materials, such as scrimmed HEPA media, often have high efficiency but often have short lifetimes and can be degraded through water exposure.
There remains a need for a filter media construction suitable for removing odor while maintaining a lower pressure drop and higher efficiency. Additionally, there exists a need for a filter media construction that provides HEPA efficiency, odor control, and anti-microbial treatment with a single medium to control mold growth in cartridge media.
The present invention relates generally to multi-layered HEPA filter media for improved odor control and filtering. The present invention provides a multi-layered anti-microbial ePTFE HEPA filter media for improved odor control. The media is specifically designed for vacuum cleaner air filtration cartridge application, but it can also be used for a variety of other filtration systems. Such systems include but are not limited to air cleaner filtration, central air filtration for home and industrial buildings (HVAC), clean rooms, and microelectronic devices.
The filter media construction typically comprises at least three layers: an upstream media layer, a bi-component polyethylene/polyethylene terephthalate (PE/PET) layer, and a base layer. In one embodiment, PTFE is used for the upstream media layer. In another embodiment, the PFTE used for the upstream media layer is expanded PTFE (ePTFE). The ePTFE film layer provides several important benefits to the filtration media, including HEPA efficiency and tap cleanability with minimal pressure drop at HEPA efficiency. In an embodiment, the bi-component layer comprises non-woven polyethylene/polyethylene terephthalate (PE/PET). In certain embodiments the base layer comprises activated carbon.
This summary is an overview of some of the teachings of the present application and is not intended to be an exclusive or exhaustive treatment of the present subject matter. Further details are found in the detailed description and appended claims. Other aspects will be apparent to persons skilled in the art upon reading and understanding the following detailed description and viewing the drawings that form a part thereof, each of which is not to be taken in a limiting sense. The scope of the present invention is defined by the appended claims and their legal equivalents.
The invention may be more completely understood in connection with the following drawings, in which:
While the invention is susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, specifics thereof have been shown by way of example and drawings, and will be described in detail. It should be understood, however, that the invention is not limited to the particular embodiments described. On the contrary, the intention is to cover modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the invention.
The market for general-purpose vacuum cleaners and for wet/dry vacuum systems has imposed increasingly high standards of performance for the vacuum cleaners and their filters over recent years. The devices are required to remove greater and greater proportions of smaller and smaller particles from streams obtained by the vacuum cleaner from often-harsh wet or dry environments in the home, garage, basement, shop, yard, and a variety of industrial environments. The increased requirements satisfy needs for improved health, reduced allergies, improved cleanability, reduced ambient particle counts, and other requirements for home, shop, and industrial environments.
The prior art filter media has had adequate performance in assigned roles in filtration equipment and processes. However, these media all suffer from various problems. At present, filter technology provides odor control, but improved odor control is desired. Damp filters often facilitate unwanted mold and mildew growth on the filters. The mold in turn produces mold spores, which can add pollution to the air. Additionally, it is typical that filters that can achieve a desired efficiency for residential or other non-industrial applications often result in a pressure drop across the filter media that is too high for the applications.
The present invention provides a multi-layered anti-microbial ePTFE HEPA filter media for improved odor control. The media is specifically designed for vacuum cleaner air filtration cartridge application, but it can also be used for a variety of other filtration systems. Such systems include but are not limited to air cleaner filtration, central air filtration for home and industrial buildings (HVAC), cleanrooms, and microelectronic devices.
Filter Construction
Referring to
In one embodiment, PTFE is used for the upstream media layer 20. In a typical embodiment, the PFTE used for the upstream media layer 20 is expanded PTFE (ePTFE). The ePTFE film layer provides several important benefits to the filtration media, including optional HEPA efficiency and tap cleanability with minimal pressure drop at HEPA efficiency. HEPA efficiency is defined as a minimum 99.97% at 0.3 micron particles (U.S. standard).
In one embodiment, the base layer 40 comprises an activated carbon layer, and the upstream media layer 20 is ePTFE. In another embodiment, the activated carbon layer comprises a minimum of 45% activated carbon. The ePTFE filtration layer is bonded using a low melt bi-component layer 30 with carbon based media under heat and pressure.
In one embodiment, the base layer 40 comprises activated carbon and nanofiber, and the upstream media layer 20 is PTFE, as shown in
In one embodiment, the base layer 40 is melt-blown media with carbon particles, and the upstream media layer 20 is PTFE, as shown in
In one embodiment, the base layer 40 is particle laden melt-blown nanofiber with carbon particles, and the upstream media layer 20 is PTFE, as shown in
In one embodiment, the base layer 40 is particle laden melt-blown material further containing carbon particles, and the upstream media layer 20 is nanofiber created by Donaldson Company, Inc. of Bloomington, Minn. This embodiment is shown in
Exemplary Materials
The present invention may be constructed with a variety of materials. HEPA filtering material is preferred as, by definition, HEPA filters remove at least 99.97% of airborne particles 0.3 μm in diameter. However, due to the construction of the filter, the starting materials used to construct the filters of the present invention need not be HEPA efficiency in order for the entire filter media construction to be HEPA efficiency. In one embodiment, polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) is used for the upstream media layer. Expanded PTFE (ePTFE) may also be utilized in the present invention. Typically, ePTFE media have very high pressure drops and moderate HEPA efficiency.
Alternatively, as shown in
In one embodiment, the bi-component layer 30 may comprise polyethylene/polyethylene terephthalate (PE/PET). In another embodiment, the bi-component layer 30 may comprise a low melt adhesive web.
In one embodiment, the base layer 40 comprises activated carbon. In a preferred embodiment, the base layer 40 comprises a minimum of 45% activated carbon. The base layer may be produced with or without anti-microbial treatment. Alternatively, the base layer 40 comprises nanofiber with activated carbon. In this application, the nanofibers serve a multifunctional purpose: in addition to helping to capture airborne contaminants that escape ePTFE film, the nanofibers cause the overall pressure drop to be lower than if PTFE film alone is used. Consequently, use of these materials does not necessitate that the starting PTFE film be HEPA efficiency.
In another embodiment, the base media 40 comprises melt-blown media with carbon particles. The melt-blown media with carbon particles serves dual purposes: not only does it aid control odor, it also helps to capture airborne contaminants that escape the ePTFE film layer. Furthermore, the overall pressure drop is lower than if PTFE film alone is used, so the starting PTFE film need not be HEPA efficiency.
In yet another embodiment, the base media 40 comprises carbon particle laden melt-blown media with nanofibers. Such a material is suitable for removing odor with lower pressure drop and higher efficiency. The starting PTFE film of this embodiment need not be HEPA efficiency. One exemplary material that may be used for the base media 40 is a 2-in-1 carbon substrate developed by Lydall, Inc. of Manchester, Conn. An example of such a material is C-680 ActiPure® media developed by Lydall, Inc. of Manchester, Conn. The ActiPure® media comprises a non-woven material and activated carbon.
Interbasic Resources Inc. (IBR) performed efficiency and off-gassing tests on media, which is shown in
Another exemplary material for use in the base media 40 shown in
Additionally, the filter media 10 may be treated in any number of ways to improve its efficiency in removing minute particulates and for other purposes. For example, electrostatically treated media can be used, as can cellulose media having one or more layers of fine fiber, or other types of media known to those skilled in the art. The filter media 10 may also be treated with anti-microbial substances to prevent the growth of mold on the filters. Anti-viral or anti-mycotic agents may also be used to treat the filter media 10 to reduce the populations of infectious agents.
It should be noted that, as used in this specification and the appended claims, the singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the” include plural referents unless the content clearly dictates otherwise. It should also be noted that the term “or” is generally employed in its sense including “and/or” unless the content clearly dictates otherwise.
It should also be noted that, as used in this specification and the appended claims, the phrase “configured” describes a system, apparatus, or other structure that is constructed or configured to perform a particular task or adopt a particular configuration. The phrase “configured” can be used interchangeably with other similar phrases such as “arranged”, “arranged and configured”, “constructed and arranged”, “constructed”, “manufactured and arranged”, and the like.
All publications and patent applications in this specification are indicative of the level of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention pertains. All publications and patent applications are herein incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each individual publication or patent application was specifically and individually indicated by reference.
This application is intended to cover adaptations or variations of the present subject matter. It is to be understood that the above description is intended to be illustrative, and not restrictive. The scope of the present subject matter should be determined with reference to the appended claims, along with the full scope of equivalents to which such claims are entitled.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/800,485, filed Jul. 15, 2015, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/386,252, filed Jul. 31, 2012, which is the national phase application of PCT International Patent Application No. PCT/US2010/042930 filed on Jul. 22, 2010, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/227,784, filed Jul. 22, 2009, the contents of which is incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5391426 | Wu | Feb 1995 | A |
5783086 | Scanlon et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
6171375 | Howie | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6174350 | Rohn et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6260234 | Wright et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6312508 | Alberts et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6361587 | Rohn et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6395046 | Emig et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6432180 | Alberts et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6463622 | Wright et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6565637 | Alberts et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6569217 | Demarco | May 2003 | B1 |
6596044 | Bilek et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
7048773 | Riedel et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7094270 | Schultink et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7114216 | Stephens et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7131165 | Wright et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
RE39473 | Salo et al. | Jan 2007 | E |
7329295 | Greene et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7341611 | Greene et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
8573438 | Cheng | Nov 2013 | B1 |
9108130 | Patel | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9849415 | Patel | Dec 2017 | B2 |
20010015132 | Rohn et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010039692 | Wright et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010042442 | Alberts et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010047721 | Scanlon | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020139744 | Choi | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020152893 | Alberts et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030010210 | Kawano et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030037406 | Wright et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030131571 | Demarco | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040016078 | Wright et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040095141 | Watanabe et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20050028501 | Riedel et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050055796 | Wright et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050079379 | Wadsworth et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050193696 | Muller et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050223519 | Greene et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050223520 | Greene et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060075896 | Andersson | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060174597 | Greene | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060207230 | Demarco | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070044442 | Riedel et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070056136 | Stephens et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070209144 | Fester et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070227359 | Choi | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20090065436 | Kalayci et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090090245 | Olszewski | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090117367 | Stone et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090211581 | Bansal | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090239435 | Davis et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090247970 | Keleny et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090266048 | Schwarz | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100139224 | Lim et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100269464 | Mori et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20130125757 | Patel | May 2013 | A1 |
20150314226 | Patel | Nov 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102470304 | May 2012 | CN |
1236494 | Sep 2002 | EP |
1674114 | Jun 2006 | EP |
2456536 | May 2015 | EP |
2288749 | Nov 1995 | GB |
2359984 | Sep 2001 | GB |
2435820 | Sep 2007 | GB |
H05-063608 | Mar 1993 | JP |
H07016409 | Jan 1995 | JP |
2000176226 | Jun 2000 | JP |
2002370020 | Dec 2002 | JP |
2004159984 | Jun 2004 | JP |
2004532098 | Oct 2004 | JP |
2006110493 | Apr 2006 | JP |
2007301436 | Nov 2007 | JP |
2008279359 | Nov 2008 | JP |
2009136863 | Jun 2009 | JP |
2009521305 | Jun 2009 | JP |
2013500150 | Jan 2013 | JP |
9215382 | Sep 1992 | WO |
0066247 | Nov 2000 | WO |
02076276 | Oct 2002 | WO |
2005034659 | Apr 2005 | WO |
2005089615 | Sep 2005 | WO |
2006086712 | Aug 2006 | WO |
2007074997 | Nov 2007 | WO |
2007124521 | Nov 2007 | WO |
2007124522 | Nov 2007 | WO |
2007137126 | Nov 2007 | WO |
2008109117 | Sep 2008 | WO |
2011011620 | Jan 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“Decision of Rejection,” for Japanese Patent Application No. 2012-521788, dated Jul. 7, 2015 (5 pages) with English Summary. |
“English Translation of Reconsideration Report,” Issued in JP patent application No. 2012-521788 dated Feb. 5, 2016, 3 pages. |
File History for European Application No. 10737719.4 downloaded Mar. 14, 2018 (159 pages). |
File History for U.S. Appl. No. 13/386,252 downloaded Mar. 14, 2018 (952 pages). |
File History for U.S. Appl. No. 14/800,485 downloaded Mar. 9, 2018 (331 pages). |
“Final Office Action,” for Japanese Patent Application No. 2015-218869 dated Nov. 8, 2016 (2 pages), English translation. |
“Final Rejection,” For Chinese Patent Application No. 201080032259.4, dated Apr. 23, 2015 (21 pages) with English Translation. |
“First Office Action,” for Chinese Patent Application No. 201080032259.4, dated Nov. 20, 2013 (9 pages). |
“First Office Action,” for Chinese Patent Application No. 201510983191.2 dated Mar. 3, 2017 (12 pages) with English translation. |
“International Search Report and Written Opinion,” for PCT/US2010/042930, dated Dec. 15, 2010 (10 pages). |
“Non-Final Office Action,” for JP Application No. 2012-521788, dated Jun. 3, 2014 (8 pages) with English translation. |
“Notice of Allowance,” for Chinese Patent Application No. 201080032259.4, dated Oct. 10, 2015, (6 pages) with English Translation. |
“PCT Notification Concerning Transmittal of International Preliminary Report on Patentability,” from International Application No. PCT/US2010/042930, corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 61/227,784, dated Feb. 2, 2012 (7 pages). |
“Second Office Action,” for China Patent Application No. 201080032259.4, dated Oct. 11, 2014 (19 pages) with English translation. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180207567 A1 | Jul 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61227784 | Jul 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14800485 | Jul 2015 | US |
Child | 15851311 | US | |
Parent | 13386252 | US | |
Child | 14800485 | US |