Patent Grant
9352279
The present invention relates to a filter catalysed with a three-way catalyst for filtering particulate matter from exhaust gas emitted from a positive ignition internal combustion engine.
Positive ignition engines cause combustion of a hydrocarbon and air mixture using spark ignition. Contrastingly, compression ignition engines cause combustion of a hydrocarbon by injecting the hydrocarbon into compressed air. Positive ignition engines can be fueled by gasoline fuel, gasoline fuel blended with oxygenates including methanol and/or ethanol, liquid petroleum gas or compressed natural gas.
A three-way catalyst (TWC) typically contains one or more platinum group metals, particularly those selected from the group consisting of platinum, palladium and rhodium.
TWCs are intended to catalyse three simultaneous reactions: (i) oxidation of carbon monoxide to carbon dioxide, (ii) oxidation of unburned hydrocarbons to carbon dioxide and water; and (iii) reduction of nitrogen oxides to nitrogen and oxygen. These three reactions occur most efficiently when the TWC receives exhaust gas from an engine running at or about the stoichiometric point. As is well known in the art, the quantity of carbon monoxide (CO), unburned hydrocarbons (HC) and nitrogen oxides (NOx) emitted when gasoline fuel is combusted in a positive ignition (e.g. spark-ignited) internal combustion engine is influenced predominantly by the air-to-fuel ratio in the combustion cylinder. An exhaust gas having a stoichiometrically balanced composition is one in which the concentrations of oxidising gases (NOx and O2) and reducing gases (HC and CO) are substantially matched. The air-to-fuel ratio that produces this stoichiometrically balanced exhaust gas composition is typically given as 14.7:1.
Theoretically, it should be possible to achieve complete conversion of O2, NOx, CO and HC in a stoichiometrically balanced exhaust gas composition to CO2, H2O and N2 (and residual O2) and this is the duty of the TWC. Ideally, therefore, the engine should be operated in such a way that the air-to-fuel ratio of the combustion mixture produces the stoichiometrically balanced exhaust gas composition.
A way of defining the compositional balance between oxidising gases and reducing gases of the exhaust gas is the lambda (2) value of the exhaust gas, which can be defined according to equation (1) as:
Actual engine air-to-fuel ratio/Stoichiometric engine air-to-fuel ratio, (1)
wherein a lambda value of 1 represents a stoichiometrically balanced (or stoichiometric) exhaust gas composition, wherein a lambda value of >1 represents an excess of O2 and NOx and the composition is described as “lean” and wherein a lambda value of <1 represents an excess of HC and CO and the composition is described as “rich”. It is also common in the art to refer to the air-to-fuel ratio at which the engine operates as “stoichiometric”, “lean” or “rich”, depending on the exhaust gas composition which the air-to-fuel ratio generates: hence stoichiometrically-operated gasoline engine or lean-burn gasoline engine.
It should be appreciated that the reduction of NOx to N2 using a TWC is less efficient when the exhaust gas composition is lean of stoichiometric. Equally, the TWC is less able to oxidise CO and HC when the exhaust gas composition is rich. The challenge, therefore, is to maintain the composition of the exhaust gas flowing into the TWC at as close to the stoichiometric composition as possible.
Of course, when the engine is in steady state it is relatively easy to ensure that the air-to-fuel ratio is stoichiometric. However, when the engine is used to propel a vehicle, the quantity of fuel required changes transiently depending upon the load demand placed on the engine by the driver. This makes controlling the air-to-fuel ratio so that a stoichiometric exhaust gas is generated for three-way conversion particularly difficult. In practice, the air-to-fuel ratio is controlled by an engine control unit, which receives information about the exhaust gas composition from an exhaust gas oxygen (EGO) (or lambda) sensor: a so-called closed loop feedback system. A feature of such a system is that the air-to-fuel ratio oscillates (or perturbates) between slightly rich of the stoichiometric (or control set) point and slightly lean, because there is a time lag associated with adjusting air-to-fuel ratio. This perturbation is characterised by the amplitude of the air-to-fuel ratio and the response frequency (Hz).
The active components in a typical TWC comprise one or both of platinum and palladium in combination with rhodium, or even palladium only (no rhodium), supported on a high surface area oxide, and an oxygen storage component.
When the exhaust gas composition is slightly rich of the set point, there is a need for a small amount of oxygen to consume the unreacted CO and HC, i.e. to make the reaction more stoichiometric. Conversely, when the exhaust gas goes slightly lean, the excess oxygen needs to be consumed. This was achieved by the development of the oxygen storage component that liberates or absorbs oxygen during the perturbations. The most commonly used oxygen storage component (OSC) in modern TWCs is cerium oxide (CeO2) or a mixed oxide containing cerium, e.g. a Ce/Zr mixed oxide.
Ambient PM is divided by most authors into the following categories based on their aerodynamic diameter (the aerodynamic diameter is defined as the diameter of a 1 g/cm3 density sphere of the same settling velocity in air as the measured particle):
(i) PM-10—particles of an aerodynamic diameter of less than 10 μm;
(ii) Fine particles of diameters below 2.5 μm (PM-2.5);
(iii) Ultrafine particles of diameters below 0.1 μm (or 100 nm); and
(iv) Nanoparticles, characterised by diameters of less than 50 nm.
Since the mid-1990's, particle size distributions of particulates exhausted from internal combustion engines have received increasing attention due to possible adverse health effects of fine and ultrafine particles. Concentrations of PM-10 particulates in ambient air are regulated by law in the USA. A new, additional ambient air quality standard for PM-2.5 was introduced in the USA in 1997 as a result of health studies that indicated a strong correlation between human mortality and the concentration of fine particles below 2.5 μm.
Interest has now shifted towards nanoparticles generated by diesel and gasoline engines because they are understood to penetrate more deeply into human lungs than particulates of greater size and consequently they are believed to be more harmful than larger particles, extrapolated from the findings of studies into particulates in the 2.5-10.0 μm range.
Size distributions of diesel particulates have a well-established bimodal character that correspond to the particle nucleation and agglomeration mechanisms, with the corresponding particle types referred to as the nuclei mode and the accumulation mode respectively (see
Nuclei mode particles are believed to be composed mostly of volatile condensates (hydrocarbons, sulfuric acid, nitric acid etc.) and contain little solid material, such as ash and carbon. Accumulation mode particles are understood to comprise solids (carbon, metallic ash etc.) intermixed with condensates and adsorbed material (heavy hydrocarbons, sulfur species, nitrogen oxide derivatives etc.) Coarse mode particles are not believed to be generated in the diesel combustion process and may be formed through mechanisms such as deposition and subsequent re-entrainment of particulate material from the walls of an engine cylinder, exhaust system, or the particulate sampling system. The relationship between these modes is shown in
The composition of nucleating particles may change with engine operating conditions, environmental condition (particularly temperature and humidity), dilution and sampling system conditions. Laboratory work and theory have shown that most of the nuclei mode formation and growth occur in the low dilution ratio range. In this range, gas to particle conversion of volatile particle precursors, like heavy hydrocarbons and sulfuric acid, leads to simultaneous nucleation and growth of the nuclei mode and adsorption onto existing particles in the accumulation mode. Laboratory tests (see e.g. SAE 980525 and SAE 2001-01-0201) have shown that nuclei mode formation increases strongly with decreasing air dilution temperature but there is conflicting evidence on whether humidity has an influence.
Generally, low temperature, low dilution ratios, high humidity and long residence times favour nanoparticles formation and growth. Studies have shown that nanoparticles consist mainly of volatile material like heavy hydrocarbons and sulfuric acid with evidence of solid fraction only at very high loads.
Contrastingly, engine-out size distributions of gasoline particulates in steady state operation show a unimodal distribution with a peak of about 60-80 nm (see e.g. FIG. 4 in SAE 1999-01-3530). By comparison with diesel size distribution, gasoline PM is predominantly ultrafine with negligible accumulation and coarse mode.
Particulate collection of diesel particulates in a diesel particulate filter is based on the principle of separating gas-borne particulates from the gas phase using a porous barrier. Diesel filters can be defined as deep-bed filters and/or surface-type filters. In deep-bed filters, the mean pore size of filter media is bigger than the mean diameter of collected particles. The particles are deposited on the media through a combination of depth filtration mechanisms, including diffusional deposition (Brownian motion), inertial deposition (impaction) and flow-line interception (Brownian motion or inertia).
In surface-type filters, the pore diameter of the filter media is less than the diameter of the PM, so PM is separated by sieving. Separation is done by a build-up of collected diesel PM itself, which build-up is commonly referred to as “filtration cake” and the process as “cake filtration”.
It is understood that diesel particulate filters, such as ceramic wallflow monoliths, may work through a combination of depth and surface filtration: a filtration cake develops at higher soot loads when the depth filtration capacity is saturated and a particulate layer starts covering the filtration surface. Depth filtration is characterized by somewhat lower filtration efficiency and lower pressure drop than the cake filtration.
Other techniques suggested in the art for separating gasoline PM from the gas phase include vortex recovery.
Emission legislation in Europe from 1 Sep. 2014 (Euro 6) requires control of the number of particles emitted from both diesel and gasoline (positive ignition) passenger cars. For gasoline EU light duty vehicles the allowable limits are: 1000 mg/km carbon monoxide; 60 mg/km nitrogen oxides (NOx); 100 mg/km total hydrocarbons (of which <68 mg/km are non-methane hydrocarbons); and 4.5 mg/km particulate matter ((PM) for direct injection engines only). The Euro 6 PM standard will be phased in over a number of years with the standard from the beginning of 2014 being set at 6.0×1012 per km (Euro 6) and the standard set from the beginning of 2017 being 6.0×1011 per km (Euro 6+).
It is understood that the US Federal LEV III standards have been set at 3 mg/mile mass limit (currently 10 mg/mile) over US FTP cycle from 2017-2021. The limit is then yet further tightened to 1 mg/mile from 2025, although implementation of this lower standard may be brought forward to 2022.
The new Euro 6 (Euro 6 and Euro 6+) emission standard presents a number of challenging design problems for meeting gasoline emission standards. In particular, how to design a filter, or an exhaust system including a filter, for reducing the number of PM gasoline (positive ignition) emissions, yet at the same time meeting the emission standards for non-PM pollutants such as one or more of oxides of nitrogen (NOx), carbon monoxide (CO) and unburned hydrocarbons (HC), all at an acceptable back pressure, e.g. as measured by maximum on-cycle backpressure on the EU drive cycle.
It is envisaged that a minimum of particle reduction for a three-way catalysed particulate filter to meet the Euro 6 PM number standard relative to an equivalent flowthrough catalyst is ≧50%. Additionally, while some backpressure increase for a three-way catalysed wallflow filter relative to an equivalent flowthrough catalyst is inevitable, in our experience peak backpressure over the MVEG-B drive cycle (average over three tests from “fresh”) for a majority of passenger vehicles should be limited to <200 mbar, such as <180 mbar, <150 mbar and preferably <120 mbar e.g. <100 mbar.
There have been a number of recent efforts to combine TWCs with filters for meeting the Euro 6 emission standards.
US 2009/0193796 discloses an emission treatment system downstream of a gasoline direct injection engine for treatment of an exhaust gas comprising hydrocarbons, carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides and particulates, the emission treatment system comprising a catalysed particulate trap comprising a three-way conversion (TWC) catalyst coated onto or within a particulate trap.
WO 2010/0275579 discloses a catalytically active particulate filter comprising a filter element and a catalytically active coating composed of two layers. The first layer is in contact with the in-flowing exhaust gas while the second layer is in contact with the out-flowing exhaust gas. Both layers contain aluminium oxide. The first layer contains palladium, the second layer contains an oxygen-storing mixed cerium/zirconium oxide in addition to rhodium.
WO 2010/097634 discloses a filter for filtering particulate matter (PM) from exhaust gas emitted from a positive ignition engine, which filter comprising a porous substrate having inlet surfaces and outlet surfaces, wherein the inlet surfaces are separated from the outlet surfaces by a porous structure containing pores of a first mean pore size, wherein the porous substrate is coated with a washcoat comprising a plurality of solid particles wherein the porous structure of the washcoated porous substrate contains pores of a second mean pore size, and wherein the second mean pore size is less than the first mean pore size. In embodiments, the washcoat is catalysed and in a particular embodiment the catalyst is a TWC.
EP 1136115 A1 discloses a three way catalyst for purifying an exhaust gas comprising an upstream side catalyst and a downstream side catalyst.
We have now discovered that, very surprisingly, for a neutral overall precious metal content, back pressure can be reduced and hydrocarbon conversion improved yet particulate number reduction maintained relative to a filter substrate homogeneously washcoated with a three-way catalyst composition by rearranging the components of the three-way catalyst between upstream and downstream zones.
According to one aspect, the invention provides a catalysed filter for filtering particulate matter from exhaust gas emitted from a positive ignition internal combustion engine, which filter comprising a porous substrate having a total substrate length and having inlet surfaces and outlet surfaces, wherein the inlet surfaces are separated from the outlet surfaces by a porous structure containing pores of a first mean pore size, wherein the porous substrate is coated with a three-way catalyst washcoat comprising a plurality of solid particles and at least one precious metal, wherein the porous structure of the washcoated porous substrate contains pores of a second mean pore size, wherein the second mean pore size is less than the first mean pore size, which three-way catalyst washcoat being axially arranged on the porous substrate between a first zone comprising the inlet surfaces of a first substrate length less than the total substrate length and a second zone comprising the outlet surfaces of a second substrate length less than the total substrate length, wherein the sum of the substrate length in the first zone and the substrate length in the second zone≧100% and wherein:
According to one aspect, the invention provides a catalysed filter for filtering particulate matter from exhaust gas emitted from a positive ignition internal combustion engine, which filter comprising a porous substrate having a total substrate length and having inlet surfaces and outlet surfaces, wherein the inlet surfaces are separated from the outlet surfaces by a porous structure containing pores of a first mean pore size, wherein the porous substrate is coated with a three-way catalyst washcoat comprising a plurality of solid particles and at least one precious metal, wherein the porous structure of the washcoated porous substrate contains pores of a second mean pore size, wherein the second mean pore size is less than the first mean pore size, which three-way catalyst washcoat being axially arranged on the porous substrate between a first zone comprising the inlet surfaces of a first substrate length less than the total substrate length and a second zone comprising the outlet surfaces of a second substrate length less than the total substrate length, wherein the sum of the substrate length in the first zone and the substrate length in the second zone≧100% and wherein:
For the washcoat loading and total precious metal loading in features (i) and (ii) but not specifically mentioned in the definition of feature (i) or (ii), such feature is homogeneously applied between the inlet and outlet surfaces. So, for example, since feature (i) defines only the washcoat loading, the total precious metal loading is substantially the same (homogeneous) in both the first zone and the second zone. Similarly, in feature (ii), the total precious metal loading is defined. Therefore, the washcoat loading is homogeneously applied between the first zone and the second zone.
Positive ignition internal combustion engines, such as spark ignition internal combustion engines, for use in this aspect of the invention can be fuelled by gasoline fuel, gasoline fuel blended with oxygenates including methanol and/or ethanol, liquid petroleum gas or compressed natural gas.
Mean pore size can be determined by mercury porosimetry.
The porous substrate is preferably a monolith substrate and can be a metal, such as a sintered metal, or a ceramic, e.g. silicon carbide, cordierite, aluminium nitride, silicon nitride, aluminium titanate, alumina, mullite e.g., acicular mullite (see e.g. WO 01/16050), pollucite, a thermet such as Al2O3/Fe, Al2O3/Ni or B4C/Fe, or composites comprising segments of any two or more thereof. In a preferred embodiment, the filter is a wallflow filter comprising a ceramic porous filter substrate having a plurality of inlet channels and a plurality of outlet channels, wherein each inlet channel and each outlet channel is defined in part by a ceramic wall of porous structure, wherein each inlet channel is separated from an outlet channel by a ceramic wall of porous structure. This filter arrangement is also disclosed in SAE 810114, and reference can be made to this document for further details. Alternatively, the filter can be a foam, or a so-called partial filter, such as those disclosed in EP 1057519 or WO 01/080978.
It is a particular feature of the present invention that washcoat loadings used in the first, upstream zone can be higher than the previously regarded highest washcoat loadings, e.g. those disclosed in the Examples in WO 2010/097634. In a particular embodiment, the washcoat loading in the first zone is >1.60 g in−3, and in preferred embodiments the washcoat loading in the first zone is >2.4 g in−3.
In the catalysed filter according to the invention, the sum of the substrate length in the first zone and the substrate length in the second zone≧100%, i.e. there is no gap in the axial direction, or there is axial overlap, between the first zone on the inlet surface and the second zone on the outlet surface.
The length of axial overlap between inlet and outlet surface coatings can be >10%, e.g. 10-30%, i.e. the sum of the substrate length in the first zone and the substrate length in the second zone>110%, e.g. 110-130%.
The substrate length in the first zone can be the same as or different from that of the second zone. So, where the first zone length is the same as the second zone length the porous substrate is coated in a ratio of 1:1 between the inlet surface and the outlet surface. However, in one embodiment, the substrate length in the first zone<the substrate length in the second zone.
In embodiments, the substrate length in the first zone<the substrate length in the second zone, e.g. <45%. In preferred embodiments, the substrate zone length in the first zone is <40%, e.g. <35% of the total substrate length.
In the catalysed filter of feature (ii) or (iii), the total precious metal loading in the first zone>the total precious metal loading in the second zone. In particularly preferred embodiments, the total precious metal loading in the first zone is >50 gft−3, but is preferably between 60-250 gft−3, and is typically from 70-150 gft−3. Total precious metal loadings in the second zone can be e.g. <50 gft−3, e.g. <30 gft−3 such as <20 gft−3.
In preferred embodiments, the first and second zones comprise a surface washcoat, wherein a washcoat layer substantially covers surface pores of the porous structure and the pores of the washcoated porous substrate are defined in part by spaces between the particles (interparticle pores) in the washcoat. Methods of making surface coated porous filter substrates include introducing a polymer, e.g. poly vinyl alcohol (PVA), into the porous structure, applying a washcoat to the porous filter substrate including the polymer and drying, then calcining the coated substrate to burn out the polymer. A schematic representation of the first embodiment is shown in
Methods of coating porous filter substrates are known to the skilled person and include, without limitation, the method disclosed in WO 99/47260, i.e. a method of coating a monolithic support, comprising the steps of (a) locating a containment means on top of a support, (b) dosing a pre-determined quantity of a liquid component into said containment means, either in the order (a) then (b) or (b) then (a), and (c) by applying pressure or vacuum, drawing said liquid component into at least a portion of the support, and retaining substantially all of said quantity within the support. Such process steps can be repeated from another end of the monolithic support following drying of the first coating with optional firing/calcination.
Alternatively, the method disclosed in WO 2011/080525 can be used, i.e. comprising the steps of: (i) holding a honeycomb monolith substrate substantially vertically; (ii) introducing a pre-determined volume of the liquid into the substrate via open ends of the channels at a lower end of the substrate; (iii) sealingly retaining the introduced liquid within the substrate; (iv) inverting the substrate containing the retained liquid; and (v) applying a vacuum to open ends of the channels of the substrate at the inverted, lower end of the substrate to draw the liquid along the channels of the substrate.
In this preferred embodiment, an average interparticle pore size of the porous washcoat is 5.0 nm to 5.0 μm, such as 0.1-1.0 μm.
As explained hereinabove, TWC composition generally comprises one or both of platinum and palladium in combination with rhodium, or even palladium only (no rhodium), supported on a high surface area oxide, e.g. gamma alumina, and an oxygen storage component, e.g. comprising a mixed oxide comprising cerium. In embodiments, the mean size (D50) of the solid washcoat particles is in the range 1 to 40 μm. In practice, the oxygen storage components may have a different particle size from the high surface area oxide. So, an OSC may have a D50 between 1-10 μm, such as from 4 and 6 μm; and a high surface area oxide may have a D50 of between 1-10 μm, such as from 4 and 6 μm.
In further embodiments, the D90 of solid washcoat particles is in the range of from 0.1 to 20 μm. Again, the D90 of the OSC may be different from that of the high surface area oxide. So, the D90 of the OSC can be <18 μm and the D90 of the high surface area oxide can be <20 μm.
Preferably, the porous substrate is a monolith substrate. In particularly preferred embodiments, the porous substrate for use in the present invention is a ceramic wall flow filter made from e.g. cordierite, or silicon carbide or any of the other materials described hereinabove. However, substrate monoliths other than flow-through monoliths can be used as desired, e.g. partial filters (see e.g. WO 01/080978 or EP 1057519), metal foam substrates etc.
The cell density of diesel wallflow filters in practical use can be different from wallflow filters for use in the present invention in that the cell density of diesel wallflow filters is generally 300 cells per square inch (cpsi) or less, e.g. 100 or 200 cpsi, so that the relatively larger diesel PM components can enter inlet channels of the filter without becoming impacted on the solid frontal area of the diesel particulate filter, thereby caking and fouling access to the open channels, whereas wallflow filters for use in the present invention can be up to 300 cpsi or greater, such as 350 cpsi, 400, cpsi, 600 cpsi, 900 cpsi or even 1200 cpsi.
An advantage of using higher cell densities is that the filter can have a reduced cross-section, e.g. diameter, than diesel particulate filters, which is a useful practical advantage that increases design options for locating exhaust systems on a vehicle.
It will be understood that the benefit of filters for use in the invention is substantially independent of the porosity of the uncoated porous substrate. Porosity is a measure of the percentage of void space in a porous substrate and is related to backpressure in an exhaust system: generally, the lower the porosity, the higher the backpressure. However, the porosity of filters for use in the present invention are typically >40% or >50% and porosities of 45-75% such as 50-65% or 55-60% can be used with advantage. The mean pore size of the washcoated porous substrate is important for filtration. So, it is possible to have a porous substrate of relatively high porosity that is a poor filter because the mean pore size is also relatively high.
In embodiments, the first mean pore size e.g. of surface pores of the porous structure of the porous filter substrate is from 8 to 45 μm, for example 8 to 25 μm, 10 to 20 μm or 10 to 15 μm. In particular embodiments, the first mean pore size is >18 μm such as from 15 to 45 μm, 20 to 45 μm e.g. 20 to 30 μm, or 25 to 45 μm.
According to a second aspect, the present invention provides an exhaust system for a positive ignition internal combustion engine comprising a catalysed filter according to the first aspect of the present invention, wherein the first zone is disposed upstream of the second zone.
In a preferred embodiment, the exhaust system comprises a flow through monolith substrate comprising a three-way catalyst composition disposed upstream of the catalysed filter.
According to a third aspect, the invention provides a positive ignition engine comprising an exhaust system according to the second aspect of the present invention.
The filter according to the invention could obviously be used in combination with other exhaust system aftertreatment components to provide a full exhaust system aftertreatment apparatus, e.g. a low thermal mass TWC upstream of the filter and/or downstream catalytic elements, e.g. NOx trap or SCR catalyst, according to specific requirements. So, in vehicular positive ignition applications producing relatively cool on-drive cycle exhaust gas temperatures, we contemplate using a low thermal mass TWC disposed upstream of the filter according to the invention. For vehicular lean-burn positive ignition applications, we envisage using a filter according to the invention upstream or downstream of a NOx trap. In vehicular stoichiometrically-operated positive ignition engines, we believe that the filter according to the present invention can be used as a standalone catalytic exhaust system aftertreatment component. That is, in certain applications the filter according to the present invention is adjacent and in direct fluid communication with the engine without intervening catalysts therebetween; and/or an exit to atmosphere from an exhaust gas aftertreatment system is adjacent to and in direct fluid communication with the filter according to the present invention without intervening catalysts therebetween.
An additional requirement of a TWC is a need to provide a diagnosis function for its useful life, so called “on-board diagnostics” or OBD. A problem in OBD arises where there is insufficient oxygen storage capacity in the TWC, because OBD processes for TWCs use remaining oxygen storage capacity to diagnose remaining catalyst function. However, if insufficient washcoat is loaded on the filter such as in the specific Examples disclosed in US 2009/0193796 and WO 2009/043390, there may not be enough OSC present to provide an accurate OSC “delta” for OBD purposes. Since the present invention enables washcoat loadings approaching current state-of-the-art TWCs, the filters for use in the present invention can be used with advantage in current OBD processes.
According to a fourth aspect, the invention provides a method of simultaneously converting carbon monoxide, hydrocarbons, oxides of nitrogen and particulate matter in the exhaust gas of a positive ignition internal combustion engine, which method comprising the step of contacting the gas with a catalysed filter according to the first aspect of the present invention.
In order that the invention may be more fully understood, reference is made to the accompanying drawings wherein:
In order that the invention may be more fully understood the following Examples are provided by way of illustration only. The washcoat loadings quoted in the Examples were obtained using the method disclosed in WO 2011/080525.
Two cordierite wall-flow filters of dimensions 4.66×5.5 inches, 300 cells per square inch, wall thickness 13 thousandths of an inch and having a mean pore size of 20 μm and a porosity of 65% were each coated with a TWC composition in a different configuration from the other. In each case, the TWC composition was milled to a d90<17 μm) so that the coating when applied would be expected preferentially to locate more at the surface of a wallflow filter wall (“on-wall”).
A first filter (referred to in Table 1 as having a “Homogeneous” washcoat loading) was coated in channels intended for the inlet side of the filter with a TWC washcoat zone extending for a targeted 33.3% of the total length of the filter substrate measured from the open channel ends with a washcoat comprising a precious metal loading of 85 g/ft3 (80Pd:5Rh) and at a washcoat loading of 2.4 g/in3. The outlet channels were coated to a length of 66.6% of the total length of the filter substrate measured from the open channel ends with a washcoat comprising a precious metal loading of 18 g/ft3 (16Pd:2Rh) at a washcoat loading also of 2.4 g/in3. X-ray imaging was used to ensure that an overlap occurred in the longitudinal plane between the inlet channel zone and the outlet channel zone. So, the washcoat loading was homogeneous between the first and second zones, but the platinum group metal loading in the first zone>second zone. That is, the first filter is according to claim 1, feature (ii).
A second filter (referred to in Table 1 as having a “Zoned” washcoat loading) was coated in the inlet channels with a TWC washcoat zone extending for a targeted 33.33% of the total length of the filter substrate measured from the open channel ends with a washcoat comprising a precious metal loading of 85 g/ft3 (80Pd:5Rh) and at a washcoat loading of 2.8 g/in3. The outlet channels were coated to a length of 66.66% of the total length of the filter substrate measured from the open channel ends with a washcoat comprising a precious metal loading of 18 g/ft3 (16Pd:2Rh) at a washcoat loading of 1.0 g/in3. X-ray imaging was used to ensure that an overlap occurred in the longitudinal plane between the inlet channel zone and the outlet channel zone. So, both the washcoat loading and the platinum group metal loading in the first zone>second zone. That is, the second filter is according to claim 1, feature (iii).
The total precious metal content of the first and second filters was identical.
Each filter was hydrothermally oven-aged at 1100° C. for 4 hours and installed in a close-coupled position on a Euro 5 passenger car with a 2.0 L direct injection gasoline engine. Each filter was evaluated over a minimum of three MVEG-B drive cycles, measuring the reduction in particle number emissions relative to a reference catalyst. The reference catalyst was a TWC coated homogeneously onto a 600 cells per square inch cordierite flowthrough substrate monolith having the same dimensions as the first and second filters and at a washcoat loading of 3 gin−3 and a precious metal loading of 33 gft−3 (30Pd:3Rh). The backpressure differential was determined between sensors mounted upstream and downstream of the filter (or reference catalyst).
In Europe, since the year 2000 (Euro 3 emission standard) emissions are tested over the New European Driving Cycle (NEDC). This consists of four repeats of the previous ECE 15 driving cycle plus one Extra Urban Driving Cycle (EUDC) with no 40 second warm-up period before beginning emission sampling. This modified cold start test is also referred to as the “MVEG-B” drive cycle. All emissions are expressed in g/km.
The Euro 5/6 implementing legislation introduces a new PM mass emission measurement method developed by the UN/ECE Particulate Measurement Programme (PMP) which adjusts the PM mass emission limits to account for differences in results using old and the new methods. The Euro 5/6 legislation also introduces a particle number emission limit (PMP method), in addition to the mass-based limits.
The results of the tests are shown in Table 1, from which it can be seen that the filter washcoated in the zoned configuration shows improved back pressure and has good (though moderately lower) levels of particle number reduction relative to the homogeneously washcoated filter. Despite the moderate reduction in lower particle number reduction, the second filter would still meet the full Euro 6+(2017) standard limit.
Two cordierite wall-flow filters of dimensions 4.66×4.5 inches, 300 cells per square inch, wall thickness 13 thousandths of an inch, mean pore size of 20 μm and a porosity of 65% were each coated with a TWC composition in a different configuration from the other. In each case, the TWC composition was milled to a d90<17 μm) so that the coating when applied would be expected preferentially to locate more at the surface of a wallflow filter wall (“on-wall”).
A third filter (referred to in Table 2 as having a “Homogeneous” platinum group metal loading (Comparative Example)) was coated in channels intended for the inlet side of the filter and outlet side of the filter with a TWC washcoat zone extending for a targeted 50% of the total length of the filter substrate measured from the open channel ends with a washcoat comprising a precious metal loading of 60 gft−3 (57Pd:3Rh) and at a washcoat loading of 2.4 g/in3.
A fourth filter (referred to in Table 2 as having a “Zoned” PGM loading) was coated in channels intended for the inlet side of the filter with a TWC washcoat zone extending for a targeted 50% of the total length of the filter substrate measured from the open channel ends with a washcoat comprising 100 g/ft−3 precious metal (97Pd:3Rh) at a washcoat loading of 2.4 g/in3; and the outlet channels were coated with a TWC washcoat zone extending for a targeted 50% of the total length of the filter substrate measured from the open channel ends with a washcoat comprising 20 g/ft−3 precious metal (17Pd:3Rh), also at a washcoat loading of 2.4 g/in3. That is, the fourth filter is according to claim 1, feature (ii).
The total precious metal content of the third and fourth filters was identical.
Each filter was hydrothermally oven-aged at 1100° C. for 4 hours and installed in a close-coupled position on a Euro 5 passenger car with a 1.4 L direct injection gasoline engine. Each filter was evaluated over a minimum of three MVEG-B drive cycles, measuring the reduction in particle number emissions relative to a reference catalyst. Peak backpressure (BP) was also evaluated in the same way as described in Example 1.
Hydrocarbon light-off temperature (the temperature at which the catalyst catalyses the conversion of hydrocarbons in the feed gas at 50% efficiency or greater) was evaluated on a separate engine mounted in a laboratory test cell. This engine was a 2.0 liter turbo charged direct injection gasoline engine. The exhaust gas temperature was carefully regulated and increased from 250-450° C. over a given period of time through the use of a combination of a temperature heat sink and increasing throttle position, during which time the conversion efficiency of the catalyst was measured and reported.
The results of zone coating the precious metal in the filter substrate are shown in Table 2, from which it can be seen that—as could be expected with identical washcoat loadings between the two filters—the % particle number reduction vs. the flow through reference catalyst (homogeneous 60 gft−3 precious metal content (57Pd:3Rh) at 3 gin−3 homogeneous washcoat loading on a 600 cells per square inch cordierite monolith substrate having the same dimensions as the third and fourth filters) are identical. However, the hydrocarbon light-off is higher for the Homogenous PGM configuration relative to the Zoned configuration. This can be attributed to the higher concentration of PGM on the inlet side.
For the avoidance of any doubt, the entire contents of all prior art documents cited herein is incorporated herein by reference.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1207313.6 | Apr 2012 | GB | national |
This invention claims the priority benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/637,545 filed on Apr. 24, 2012 and Great Britain Patent Application No. 1207313.6, filed on Apr. 27, 2012, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5057483 | Wan | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5473887 | Takeshima et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5898014 | Wu et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 6423293 | Chun et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 7393808 | Yoshida et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7550117 | Alward et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7572416 | Alward et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7772151 | Li et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7785544 | Alward et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 8012439 | Arnold et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8211393 | Arnold et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8404203 | Bull et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
| 8475752 | Wan | Jul 2013 | B2 |
| 8512657 | Arnold et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
| 8540952 | Swallow et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
| 8608820 | Arnold et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8637426 | Hoke et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
| 8640440 | Klingmann et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
| 8652429 | Sumiya et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
| 8667785 | Blakeman et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
| 8668891 | Blakeman et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
| 8735311 | Bull et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
| 8789356 | Phillips et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8795617 | Swallow et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
| 8815189 | Arnold et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
| 8919110 | Arnold et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
| 20030126133 | Dattatri et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20040191133 | Yamaguchi | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20060039843 | Patchett et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060057046 | Punke et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20070012028 | Weissman et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070104623 | Dettling et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20080045405 | Beutel et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080053070 | Hatton | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080124514 | Fujdala et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20090087365 | Klingmann et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090129995 | Pfeifer et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090193796 | Wei et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090274602 | Alward et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090288402 | Voss et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20100058746 | Pfeifer et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100077727 | Southward et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100077738 | Cavataio et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100092358 | Koegel et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100126133 | Fekety et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100189616 | Hodgson et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100275579 | Klingmann et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20110158871 | Arnold et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110176969 | Michiaki et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110179777 | Chandler et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110185709 | Zhang et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110201493 | Goto et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110252773 | Arnold et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110271664 | Boorse et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20120129690 | Larcher et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120304623 | Springer et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20130149207 | Castagnola et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130149223 | Blakeman et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130243659 | Sutton et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20140154163 | Andersen et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140186228 | Arnold et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140186244 | Blakeman et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140219879 | Bull et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140227155 | Phillips et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140234189 | Clowes et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140271422 | Tang | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140271426 | Casci et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140271429 | Kazi et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140301923 | Tang et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140301924 | Morgan | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140322112 | Blakeman et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 102004040548 | Feb 2006 | DE |
| 102010055147 | Jun 2012 | DE |
| 102011050788 | Dec 2012 | DE |
| 0766993 | Apr 1997 | EP |
| 1057519 | Dec 2000 | EP |
| 1108864 | Jun 2001 | EP |
| 1136115 | Sep 2001 | EP |
| 1663458 | Jan 2009 | EP |
| 2042225 | Apr 2009 | EP |
| 2042226 | Apr 2009 | EP |
| 2184459 | May 2010 | EP |
| 2650042 | Oct 2013 | EP |
| 2928176 | Sep 2009 | FR |
| 2406803 | Apr 2005 | GB |
| 2468210 | Sep 2010 | GB |
| 2476585 | Jun 2011 | GB |
| 2497441 | Jun 2013 | GB |
| 2497442 | Jun 2013 | GB |
| 2005264866 | Sep 2005 | JP |
| 9947260 | Sep 1999 | WO |
| 0116050 | Mar 2001 | WO |
| 0180978 | Nov 2001 | WO |
| 2006031600 | Mar 2006 | WO |
| 2007011498 | Jan 2007 | WO |
| 2008022967 | Feb 2008 | WO |
| 2008132452 | Nov 2008 | WO |
| 2009043390 | Apr 2009 | WO |
| 2009079590 | Jun 2009 | WO |
| 2009089156 | Jul 2009 | WO |
| 2009100097 | Aug 2009 | WO |
| 2010004320 | Jan 2010 | WO |
| 2010097634 | Sep 2010 | WO |
| 2011015615 | Feb 2011 | WO |
| 2011077139 | Jun 2011 | WO |
| 2011080525 | Jul 2011 | WO |
| 2011110919 | Sep 2011 | WO |
| 2012069405 | May 2012 | WO |
| 2014174277 | Oct 2014 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| GB Search Report dated Apr. 2, 2013 for corresponding United Kingdom Patent Application No. GB1301761.1. |
| GB Search Report dated Apr. 2, 2013 for corresponding United Kingdom Patent Application No. GB1301893.2. |
| GB Search Report dated Nov. 4, 2013 for corresponding United Kingdom Patent Application No. GB1307384.6. |
| Abdul-Khalek, I.S. et al., “Diesel Exhaust Particle Size: Measurement Issues and Trends,” 1998, Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc., SAE 980525. |
| Wei, Qiang, Kittelson, David B., Watts, Winthrop F., “Single-Stage Dilution Tunnel Performance,” 2001, Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc., SAE 2001-01-0201. |
| Hall, D.E., and Dickens, C.J., “Measurement of the Number and Size Distribution of Particles Emitted from a Gasoline Direct Injection Vehicle,” 1999, Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc., SAE 1999-01-3530. |
| Howitt, John S., Montierth, Max R., “Cellular Ceramic Diesel Particulate Filter,” 1981, Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc., SAE 810114. |
| GB Search Report dated Aug. 24, 2012, for corresponding United Kingdom Patent Application No. GB1207313.6. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20140044626 A1 | Feb 2014 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61637545 | Apr 2012 | US |
