A portion of the disclosure of this patent document contains material which is subject to copyright protection. This patent document may show and/or describe matter which is or may become trade dress of the owner. The copyright and trade dress owner has no objection to the facsimile reproduction by anyone of the patent disclosure as it appears in the Patent and Trademark Office patent files or records, but otherwise reserves all copyright and trade dress rights whatsoever.
This disclosure relates to radio frequency filters using acoustic wave resonators, and specifically to filters for use in communications equipment.
A radio frequency (RF) filter is a two-port device configured to pass some frequencies and to stop other frequencies, where “pass” means transmit with relatively low signal loss and “stop” means block or substantially attenuate. The range of frequencies passed by a filter is referred to as the “pass-band” of the filter. The range of frequencies stopped by such a filter is referred to as the “stop-band” of the filter. A typical RF filter has at least one pass-band and at least one stop-band. Specific requirements on a pass-band or stop-band depend on the specific application. For example, a “pass-band” may be defined as a frequency range where the insertion loss of a filter is better than a defined value such as 1 dB, 2 dB, or 3 dB. A “stop-band” may be defined as a frequency range where the rejection of a filter is greater than a defined value such as 20 dB, 30 dB, 40 dB, or greater depending on application.
RF filters are used in communications systems where information is transmitted over wireless links. For example, RF filters may be found in the RF front-ends of cellular base stations, mobile telephone and computing devices, satellite transceivers and ground stations, IoT (Internet of Things) devices, laptop computers and tablets, fixed point radio links, and other communications systems. RF filters are also used in radar and electronic and information warfare systems.
RF filters typically require many design trade-offs to achieve, for each specific application, the best compromise between performance parameters such as insertion loss, rejection, isolation, power handling, linearity, size and cost. Specific design and manufacturing methods and enhancements can benefit simultaneously one or several of these requirements.
Performance enhancements to the RF filters in a wireless system can have broad impact to system performance. Improvements in RF filters can be leveraged to provide system performance improvements such as larger cell size, longer battery life, higher data rates, greater network capacity, lower cost, enhanced security, higher reliability, etc. These improvements can be realized at many levels of the wireless system both separately and in combination, for example at the RF module, RF transceiver, mobile or fixed sub-system, or network levels.
The desire for wider communication channel bandwidths will inevitably lead to the use of higher frequency communications bands. The current LTE™ (Long Term Evolution) specification defines frequency bands from 3.3 GHz to 5.9 GHz. Some of these bands are not presently used. Future proposals for wireless communications include millimeter wave communication bands with frequencies up to 28 GHz.
High performance RF filters for present communication systems commonly incorporate acoustic wave resonators including surface acoustic wave (SAW) resonators, bulk acoustic wave BAW) resonators, film bulk acoustic wave resonators (FBAR), and other types of acoustic resonators. However, these existing technologies are not well-suited for use at the higher frequencies proposed for future communications networks.
Throughout this description, elements appearing in figures are assigned three-digit or four-digit reference designators, where the two least significant digits are specific to the element and the one or two most significant digit is the figure number where the element is first introduced. An element that is not described in conjunction with a figure may be presumed to have the same characteristics and function as a previously-described element having the same reference designator.
Description of Apparatus
The XBAR 100 is made up of a thin film conductor pattern formed on a surface of a piezoelectric plate 110 having parallel front and back surfaces 112, 114, respectively. The piezoelectric plate is a thin single-crystal layer of a piezoelectric material such as lithium niobate, lithium tantalate, lanthanum gallium silicate, gallium nitride, or aluminum nitride. The piezoelectric plate is cut such that the orientation of the X, Y, and Z crystalline axes with respect to the front and back surfaces is known and consistent. In the examples presented in this patent, the piezoelectric plates are Z-cut, which is to say the Z axis is normal to the front and back surfaces 112, 114. However, XBARs may be fabricated on piezoelectric plates with other crystallographic orientations including rotated Z-cut and rotated Y-cut.
The back surface 114 of the piezoelectric plate 110 is attached to a surface of the substrate 120 except for a portion of the piezoelectric plate 110 that forms a diaphragm 115 spanning a cavity 140 formed in the substrate. The portion of the piezoelectric plate that spans the cavity is referred to herein as the “diaphragm” 115 due to its physical resemblance to the diaphragm of a microphone. As shown in
The substrate 120 provides mechanical support to the piezoelectric plate 110. The substrate 120 may be, for example, silicon, sapphire, quartz, or some other material or combination of materials. The back surface 114 of the piezoelectric plate 110 may be bonded to the substrate 120 using a wafer bonding process. Alternatively, the piezoelectric plate 110 may be grown on the substrate 120 or attached to the substrate in some other manner. The piezoelectric plate 110 may be attached directly to the substrate or may be attached to the substrate 120 via one or more intermediate material layers.
“Cavity” has its conventional meaning of “an empty space within a solid body.” The cavity 140 may be a hole completely through the substrate 120 (as shown in Section A-A and Section B-B) or a recess in the substrate 120 (as shown subsequently in
The conductor pattern of the XBAR 100 includes an interdigital transducer (IDT) 130. The IDT 130 includes a first plurality of parallel fingers, such as finger 136, extending from a first busbar 132 and a second plurality of fingers extending from a second busbar 134. The first and second pluralities of parallel fingers are interleaved. The interleaved fingers overlap for a distance AP, commonly referred to as the “aperture” of the IDT. The center-to-center distance L between the outermost fingers of the IDT 130 is the “length” of the IDT.
The first and second busbars 132, 134 serve as the terminals of the XBAR 100. A radio frequency or microwave signal applied between the two busbars 132, 134 of the IDT 130 excites a primary acoustic mode within the piezoelectric plate 110. As will be discussed in further detail, the primary acoustic mode is a bulk shear mode where acoustic energy propagates along a direction substantially orthogonal to the surface of the piezoelectric plate 110, which is also normal, or transverse, to the direction of the electric field created by the IDT fingers. Thus, the XBAR is considered a transversely-excited film bulk wave resonator.
The IDT 130 is positioned on the piezoelectric plate 110 such that at least the fingers of the IDT 130 are disposed on the diaphragm 115 of the piezoelectric plate that spans, or is suspended over, the cavity 140. As shown in
For ease of presentation in
A front-side dielectric layer 214 may optionally be formed on the front side of the piezoelectric plate 110. The “front side” of the XBAR is, by definition, the surface facing away from the substrate. The front-side dielectric layer 214 has a thickness tfd. The front-side dielectric layer 214 is formed between the IDT fingers 238. Although not shown in
The IDT fingers 238 may be aluminum, a substantially aluminum alloys, copper, a substantially copper alloys, beryllium, gold, or some other conductive material. Thin (relative to the total thickness of the conductors) layers of other metals, such as chromium or titanium, may be formed under and/or over the fingers to improve adhesion between the fingers and the piezoelectric plate 110 and/or to passivate or encapsulate the fingers. The busbars (132, 134 in
Dimension p is the center-to-center spacing or “pitch” of the IDT fingers, which may be referred to as the pitch of the IDT and/or the pitch of the XBAR. Dimension w is the width or “mark” of the IDT fingers. The IDT of an XBAR differs substantially from the IDTs used in surface acoustic wave (SAW) resonators. In a SAW resonator, the pitch of the IDT is one-half of the acoustic wavelength at the resonance frequency. Additionally, the mark-to-pitch ratio of a SAW resonator IDT is typically close to 0.5 (i.e. the mark or finger width is about one-fourth of the acoustic wavelength at resonance). In an XBAR, the pitch p of the IDT is typically 2 to 20 times the width w of the fingers. In addition, the pitch p of the IDT is typically 2 to 20 times the thickness is of the piezoelectric plate 110. The width of the IDT fingers in an XBAR is not constrained to one-fourth of the acoustic wavelength at resonance. For example, the width of XBAR IDT fingers may be 500 nm or greater, such that the IDT can be fabricated using optical lithography. The thickness tm of the IDT fingers may be from 100 nm to about equal to the width w. The thickness of the busbars (132, 134 in
In
The three series resonators X1, X3, X5 and the two shunt resonators X2, X4 of the filter 400 maybe formed on a single plate 430 of piezoelectric material bonded to a silicon substrate (not visible). Each resonator includes a respective IDT (not shown), with at least the fingers of the IDT disposed over a cavity in the substrate. In this and similar contexts, the term “respective” means “relating things each to each”, which is to say with a one-to-one correspondence. In
Each of the resonators X1 to X5 has a resonance frequency and an anti-resonance frequency. In over-simplified terms, each resonator is effectively a short circuit at its resonance frequency and effectively an open circuit at its anti-resonance frequency. Each resonator X1 to X5 creates a “transmission zero”, where the transmission between the in and out ports is very low. Note that the transmission at a “transmission zero” is not actually zero due to energy leakage through parasitic components and other effects. The three series resonators X1, X3, X5 create transmission zeros at their respective anti-resonance frequencies (where each resonator is effectively an open circuit). The two shunt resonators X2, X4 create transmission zeros at their respective resonance frequencies (where each resonator is effectively a short circuit). In a typical band-pass filter using acoustic resonators, resonance frequencies of the shunt resonators are below the passband and the anti-resonance frequencies of the shunt resonators are within the passband. Resonance frequencies of the series resonators are within the passband and the anti-resonance frequencies of the series resonators are above the passband.
The resonance frequency of an XBAR is determined by the thickness of the diaphragm, including the piezoelectric plate and any dielectric layers, and the pitch of the IDT fingers. The thickness of the diaphragm is the dominant parameter and the tuning range provided by varying the pitch is limited. For broad bandwidth filters, the tuning range provided by varying the pitch may be insufficient to provide the necessary separation between the resonance frequencies of the shunt and series resonators. patent Ser. No. 10,491,192 describes the use of a dielectric frequency setting layer formed only over shunt resonators to increase the frequency separation between the shunt and series resonators. Some filters, such as filters requiring a wide stopband on one or both sides of the passband, require significant separation of the resonance frequencies of the shunt resonators and/or the anti-resonance frequencies of the series resonators.
Resonator A does not include a dielectric frequency setting layer. In this case, the thickness of the diaphragm of resonator A is equal to the thickness tp of the piezoelectric plate 510. Resonator B has a first frequency setting layer 570 formed over the IDT fingers 530. The thickness of the diaphragm of resonator B is equal to tp plus the thickness td1 of the first frequency setting layer. Resonator C has a second frequency setting layer 575 formed over the IDT fingers 530. The thickness of the diaphragm of resonator C is equal to tp plus the thickness td2 of the second frequency setting layer. The thickness td2 of the second frequency setting layer is greater than the thickness td1 of the first frequency setting layer. Resonator D includes both the first frequency setting layer 570 and the second frequency setting layer 575. The thickness of the diaphragm of resonator D is equal to tp+td1+td2. Since the resonant frequency of an XBAR is highly dependent on diaphragm thickness, the following relationships will usually hold:
fA>fB>fC>fD,
where fA, fB, fC, and fD are the resonance frequencies of resonators A-D, respectively.
The first frequency setting layer 570 and the second frequency setting layer 575 may be silicon dioxide, silicon nitride, silicon oxynitride, aluminum oxide, or some other dielectric material with low acoustic loss. The first frequency setting layer 570 and the second frequency setting layer 575 are typically, but not necessarily, the same material. All or portions of the first frequency setting layer 570 and/or the second frequency setting layer 575 may be formed on the back surface 514 of the piezoelectric plate 510.
An optional thin dielectric passivation layer 580 (shown in dashed lines) may be applied over all of the resonators. If present, the thickness of the passivation layer 580 may be comparable to or less than the thickness td1 of the first frequency setting layer 570.
The structure of series resonators S1 and S5 will be similar to that of Resonator A in
The inclusion of five series resonators and four shut resonators in the filter 600 is exemplary, as is the number of resonators that have none, one, or both of the frequency setting layers. In general, the first frequency setting layer will be formed over a first subset of the total number of resonators and the second frequency setting layer will be formed over a second subset of the total number of resonators. In this context, the word “subset” has its conventional meaning of “some but not all”. The first and second subsets will not be identical. One or more resonators (e.g. resonator P4 in this example) may belong to both subsets and thus receive both the first and second frequency setting layers. One or more resonators (S1 and S5 in this example) may not belong to either subset. In addition to the first and second frequency setting layers, a passivation layer may be applied over all resonators.
The effect of frequency setting dielectric layers can be understood through consideration of
Resonance frequency has a roughly linear dependence on IDT pitch for the IDT pitch range of 3 to 5 microns. However, the dependence is weak, with a 50% change in IDT pitch resulting in roughly 2% change in resonance frequency. Resonance frequency has a stronger dependence on frequency setting dielectric layer thickness. For resonators having the same IDT pitch, the first frequency dielectric layer lowers resonance frequency by about 105 MHz compared to resonators with no dielectric layer. For resonators having the same IDT pitch, the second frequency dielectric layer lowers resonance frequency by about 440 MHz compared to resonators with no dielectric layer.
Description of Methods
The flow chart of
The piezoelectric plate may be, for example, Z-cut lithium niobate or lithium tantalate as used in the previously presented examples. The piezoelectric plate may be some other material and/or some other cut. The substrate may preferably be silicon. The substrate may be some other material that allows formation of deep cavities by etching or other processing.
In one variation of the process 900, one or more cavities are formed in the substrate at 910A before the piezoelectric plate is bonded to the substrate at 920. A separate cavity may be formed for each resonator in a filter device. The one or more cavities may be formed using conventional photolithographic and etching techniques. Typically, the cavities formed at 910A will not penetrate through the substrate, and the resulting resonator devices will have a cross-section as shown in
At 920, the piezoelectric plate is bonded to the substrate. The piezoelectric plate and the substrate may be bonded by a wafer bonding process. Typically, the mating surfaces of the substrate and the piezoelectric plate are highly polished. One or more layers of intermediate materials, such as an oxide or metal, may be formed or deposited on the mating surface of one or both of the piezoelectric plate and the substrate. One or both mating surfaces may be activated using, for example, a plasma process. The mating surfaces may then be pressed together with considerable force to establish molecular bonds between the piezoelectric plate and the substrate or intermediate material layers. The piezoelectric plate may be bonded to the substrate using some other technique.
A conductor pattern, including IDTs of each XBAR in the filter, is formed at 930 by depositing and patterning one or more conductor layers on the front side of the piezoelectric plate. The conductor layer may be, for example, aluminum, an aluminum alloy, copper, a copper alloy, or some other conductive metal. Optionally, one or more layers of other materials may be disposed below (i.e. between the conductor layer and the piezoelectric plate) and/or on top of the conductor layer. For example, a thin film of titanium, chrome, or other metal may be used to improve the adhesion between the conductor layer and the piezoelectric plate. A conduction enhancement layer of gold, aluminum, copper or other higher conductivity metal may be formed over portions of the conductor pattern (for example the IDT bus bars and interconnections between the IDTs).
The conductor pattern may be formed at 930 by depositing the conductor layer and, optionally, one or more other metal layers in sequence over the surface of the piezoelectric plate. The excess metal may then be removed by etching through patterned photoresist. The conductor layer can be etched, for example, by plasma etching, reactive ion etching, wet chemical etching, and other etching techniques.
Alternatively, the conductor pattern may be formed at 930 using a lift-off process. Photoresist may be deposited over the piezoelectric plate and patterned to define the conductor pattern. The conductor layer and, optionally, one or more other layers may be deposited in sequence over the surface of the piezoelectric plate. The photoresist may then be removed, which removes the excess material, leaving the conductor pattern.
At 940, the first frequency setting dielectric layer may be formed by depositing a dielectric material on the front side of the piezoelectric plate. The first frequency setting dielectric layer may be deposited using a conventional deposition technique such as atomic layer deposition, physical vapor deposition, or chemical vapor deposition. One or more lithography processes (using photomasks) may be used to limit the first frequency setting dielectric layer to selected areas of the piezoelectric plate, such as only over the fingers of a first subset of IDTs. The thickness of the first frequency setting dielectric layer is td1.
At 950, the second frequency setting dielectric layer may be formed by depositing a dielectric material on the front side of the piezoelectric plate. The second frequency setting dielectric layer may be deposited using a conventional deposition technique such as atomic layer deposition, physical vapor deposition, or chemical vapor deposition. One or more lithography processes (using photomasks) may be used to limit the second frequency setting dielectric layer to selected areas of the piezoelectric plate, such as only over the fingers of a second subset of IDTs. The thickness of the second frequency setting dielectric layer is td2. Typically, td2 >td1.
In a second variation of the process 900, one or more cavities are formed in the back side of the substrate at 910B. A separate cavity may be formed for each resonator in a filter device. The one or more cavities may be formed using an anisotropic or orientation-dependent dry or wet etch to open holes through the back side of the substrate to the piezoelectric plate. In this case, the resulting resonator devices will have a cross-section as shown in
In a third variation of the process 900, one or more cavities in the form of recesses in the substrate may be formed at 910C by etching the substrate using an etchant introduced through openings in the piezoelectric plate. A separate cavity may be formed for each resonator in a filter device. The one or more cavities formed at 910C will not penetrate through the substrate, and the resulting resonator devices will have a cross-section as shown in
In all variations of the process 900, the filter device is completed at 960. Actions that may occur at 960 include depositing an encapsulation/passivation layer such as silicon oxide or silicon nitride over all or a portion of the device; forming bonding pads or solder bumps or other means for making connection between the device and external circuitry; excising individual devices from a wafer containing multiple devices; other packaging steps; and testing. Another action that may occur at 960 is to tune the resonant frequencies of the resonators within the device by adding or removing metal or dielectric material from the front side of the device. After the filter device is completed, the process ends at 995.
Closing Comments
Throughout this description, the embodiments and examples shown should be considered as exemplars, rather than limitations on the apparatus and procedures disclosed or claimed. Although many of the examples presented herein involve specific combinations of method acts or system elements, it should be understood that those acts and those elements may be combined in other ways to accomplish the same objectives. With regard to flowcharts, additional and fewer steps may be taken, and the steps as shown may be combined or further refined to achieve the methods described herein. Acts, elements and features discussed only in connection with one embodiment are not intended to be excluded from a similar role in other embodiments.
As used herein, “plurality” means two or more. As used herein, a “set” of items may include one or more of such items. As used herein, whether in the written description or the claims, the terms “comprising”, “including”, “carrying”, “having”, “containing”, “involving”, and the like are to be understood to be open-ended, i.e., to mean including but not limited to. Only the transitional phrases “consisting of” and “consisting essentially of”, respectively, are closed or semi-closed transitional phrases with respect to claims. Use of ordinal terms such as “first”, “second”, “third”, etc., in the claims to modify a claim element does not by itself connote any priority, precedence, or order of one claim element over another or the temporal order in which acts of a method are performed, but are used merely as labels to distinguish one claim element having a certain name from another element having a same name (but for use of the ordinal term) to distinguish the claim elements. As used herein, “and/or” means that the listed items are alternatives, but the alternatives also include any combination of the listed items.
This patent is a continuation of application Ser. No. 16/924,108, filed Jul. 8, 2020, entitled FILTER USING RANSVERSELY-EXCITED FILM BULK ACOUSTIC RESONATORS WITH MULTIPLE FREQUENCY SETTING LAYERS, which is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 16,689,707, filed Nov. 20, 2019, entitled BANDPASS FILTER WITH FREQUENCY SEPARATION BETWEEN SHUNT AND SERIES RESONATORS SET BY DIELECTRIC LAYER THICKNESS. which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 16/230,443, filed Dec. 21, 2018, entitled TRANSVERSELY-EXCITED FILM BULK ACOUSTIC RESONATOR, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,491,192, which claims priority from the following provisional patent applications: application 62/685,825, filed Jun. 15, 2018, entitled SHEAR-MODE FBAR (XBAR); application 62/701,363, filed Jul. 20, 2018, entitled SHEAR-MODE FBAR (XBAR); application 62/741,702, filed Oct. 5, 2018, entitled 5 GHZ LATERALLY-EXCITED BULK WAVE RESONATOR (XBAR); application 62/748,883, filed Oct. 22, 2018, entitled SHEAR-MODE FILM BULK ACOUSTIC RESONATOR; and application 62/753,815, filed Oct. 31, 2018, entitled LITHIUM TANTALATE SHEAR-MODE FILM BULK ACOUSTIC RESONATOR. All these applications are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5853601 | Krishaswamy et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
6540827 | Levy et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6707229 | Martin | Mar 2004 | B1 |
7042132 | Bauer et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7463118 | Jacobsen | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7535152 | Ogami et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7684109 | Godshalk et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7741931 | Matsuda | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7868519 | Umeda | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7939987 | Solal et al. | May 2011 | B1 |
7965015 | Tai | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8278802 | Lee et al. | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8294330 | Abbott | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8344815 | Yamanaka | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8829766 | Milyutin et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8932686 | Hayakawa et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
9112134 | Takahashi | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9130145 | Martin et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9219466 | Meltaus et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9240768 | Nishihara et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9252732 | Yamashita | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9276557 | Nordquist et al. | Mar 2016 | B1 |
9369105 | Li | Jun 2016 | B1 |
9425765 | Rinaldi | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9525398 | Olsson | Dec 2016 | B1 |
9564873 | Kadota | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9640750 | Nakanishi | May 2017 | B2 |
9641151 | Ikeuchi | May 2017 | B2 |
9748923 | Kando et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9780759 | Kimura et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9819329 | Tsurunari | Nov 2017 | B2 |
10187039 | Komatsu et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10200013 | Bower et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10284176 | Solal | May 2019 | B1 |
10389391 | Ito et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10491192 | Plesski | Nov 2019 | B1 |
10601392 | Plesski et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
10637438 | Garcia et al. | Apr 2020 | B2 |
10756697 | Plesski et al. | Aug 2020 | B2 |
10790802 | Yantchev et al. | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10797675 | Plesski | Oct 2020 | B2 |
10819309 | Turner et al. | Oct 2020 | B1 |
10826462 | Plesski et al. | Nov 2020 | B2 |
10868510 | Yantchev | Dec 2020 | B2 |
10917070 | Plesski | Feb 2021 | B2 |
10979028 | Komatsu | Apr 2021 | B2 |
10985728 | Plesski et al. | Apr 2021 | B2 |
10992284 | Yantchev | Apr 2021 | B2 |
10998882 | Yantchev et al. | May 2021 | B2 |
11146232 | Yandrapalli et al. | Oct 2021 | B2 |
11201601 | Yantchev et al. | Dec 2021 | B2 |
11323089 | Turner | May 2022 | B2 |
11418167 | Garcia | Aug 2022 | B2 |
20020079986 | Ruby et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020158714 | Kaitila et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030128081 | Ella et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030199105 | Kub et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040041496 | Imai et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040207033 | Koshido | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040207485 | Kawachi et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040261250 | Kadota et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050099091 | Mishima et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20060131731 | Sato | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20070188047 | Tanaka | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070194863 | Shibata et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070296304 | Fujii et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080169884 | Matsumoto et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080297280 | Thalhammer et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090315640 | Umeda et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100064492 | Tanaka | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100123367 | Tai et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100212127 | Heinze et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100223999 | Onoe | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100301703 | Chen et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110102107 | Onzuka | May 2011 | A1 |
20110109196 | Goto | May 2011 | A1 |
20110278993 | Iwamoto | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20130057360 | Meltaus et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130207747 | Nishii et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130234805 | Takahashi | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130271238 | Onda et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130321100 | Wang | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140009032 | Takahashi et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140009247 | Moriya | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140113571 | Fujiwara et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140145556 | Kadota | May 2014 | A1 |
20140151151 | Reinhardt | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140152145 | Kando et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140173862 | Kando et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140225684 | Kando et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20150014795 | Franosch et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150244149 | Van Someren | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150319537 | Perois et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150333730 | Meltaus | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20160028367 | Shealy | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160036415 | Ikeuchi | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160049920 | Kishino | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160079958 | Burak | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160149554 | Nakagawa | May 2016 | A1 |
20160182009 | Bhattacharjee | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20170063332 | Gilbert et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170179928 | Raihn et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170187352 | Omura | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170201232 | Nakamura et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170214385 | Bhattacharjee | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170214387 | Burak et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170222622 | Solal et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170264266 | Kishimoto | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170290160 | Takano et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170359050 | Irieda et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20170370791 | Nakamura et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180013400 | Ito et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180013405 | Takata | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180123016 | Gong et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180152169 | Goto et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180191322 | Chang et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180212589 | Meltaus et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180262179 | Goto et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180309426 | Guenard et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180316333 | Nakamura et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20190007022 | Goto et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190068155 | Kimura et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190068164 | Houlden et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190123721 | Takamine | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190131953 | Gong | May 2019 | A1 |
20190181825 | Schmalzl et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190181833 | Nosaka | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190207583 | Miura et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190245518 | Ito | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190273480 | Lin | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190341911 | Komatsu | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190348966 | Campanella-Pineda et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20200021272 | Segovia Fernandez et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200244247 | Maeda | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200274520 | Shin et al. | Aug 2020 | A1 |
20200295729 | Yantchev | Sep 2020 | A1 |
20200304091 | Yantchev | Sep 2020 | A1 |
20200321939 | Turner et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200328728 | Nakagawa et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20210152154 | Tang et al. | May 2021 | A1 |
20210273631 | Jachowski et al. | Sep 2021 | A1 |
20210313951 | Yandrapalli et al. | Oct 2021 | A1 |
20210328575 | Hammond et al. | Oct 2021 | A1 |
20220052669 | Schãufele et al. | Feb 2022 | A1 |
20220103160 | Jachowski et al. | Mar 2022 | A1 |
20220116015 | Garcia et al. | Apr 2022 | A1 |
20220123720 | Garcia et al. | Apr 2022 | A1 |
20220123723 | Garcia et al. | Apr 2022 | A1 |
20220149808 | Dyer et al. | May 2022 | A1 |
20220149814 | Garcia et al. | May 2022 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
106788318 | May 2017 | CN |
110417373 | Nov 2019 | CN |
210431367 | Apr 2020 | CN |
113765495 | Dec 2021 | CN |
H06152299 | May 1994 | JP |
H10209804 | Aug 1998 | JP |
2001244785 | Sep 2001 | JP |
2002300003 | Oct 2002 | JP |
2003078389 | Mar 2003 | JP |
2004096677 | Mar 2004 | JP |
2004129222 | Apr 2004 | JP |
2004304622 | Oct 2004 | JP |
2006173557 | Jun 2006 | JP |
2007251910 | Sep 2007 | JP |
2010062816 | Mar 2010 | JP |
2010103803 | May 2010 | JP |
2010233210 | Oct 2010 | JP |
2012049758 | Mar 2012 | JP |
2013528996 | Jul 2013 | JP |
2013214954 | Oct 2013 | JP |
2015054986 | Mar 2015 | JP |
2016001923 | Jan 2016 | JP |
2017526254 | Sep 2017 | JP |
2017220910 | Dec 2017 | JP |
2018093487 | Jun 2018 | JP |
2018166259 | Oct 2018 | JP |
2018207144 | Dec 2018 | JP |
2019186655 | Oct 2019 | JP |
2020113939 | Jul 2020 | JP |
2010047114 | Apr 2010 | WO |
2013021948 | Feb 2013 | WO |
2013128636 | Sep 2013 | WO |
2015098694 | Jul 2015 | WO |
2016017104 | Feb 2016 | WO |
2016052129 | Apr 2016 | WO |
2016147687 | Sep 2016 | WO |
2017188342 | Nov 2017 | WO |
2018003273 | Jan 2018 | WO |
2018163860 | Sep 2018 | WO |
2019138810 | Jul 2019 | WO |
2020092414 | May 2020 | WO |
2020100744 | May 2020 | WO |
Entry |
---|
T. Takai, H. Iwamoto, et al., “I.H.P.Saw Technology and its Application to Microacoustic Components (Invited).” 2017 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium, Sep. 6-9, 2017. pp. 1-8. |
R. Olsson III, K. Hattar et al. “A high electromechanical coupling coefficient SH0 Lamb wave lithiumniobate micromechanical resonator and a method for fabrication” Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, vol. 209, Mar. 1, 2014, pp. 183-190. |
M. Kadota, S. Tanaka, “Wideband acoustic wave resonators composed of hetero acoustic layer structure,” Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 57, No. 7S1. Published Jun. 5, 2018. 5 pages. |
Y. Yang, R. Lu et al. “Towards Ka Band Acoustics: Lithium Niobat Asymmetrical Mode Piezoelectric MEMS Resonators”, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana—Champaign, May 2018. pp. 1-2. |
Y. Yang, A. Gao et al. “5 Ghz Lithium Niobate MEMS Resonators With High FOM of 153”, 2017 IEEE 30th International Conference in Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS). Jan. 22-26, 2017. pp. 942-945. |
USPTO/ISA, International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2019/036433 dated Aug. 29, 2019. |
USPTO/ISA, International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2019/058632 dated Jan. 17, 2020. |
G. Manohar, “Investigation of Various Surface Acoustic Wave Design Configurations for Improved Sensitivity.” Doctoral dissertation, University of South Florida, USA, Jan. 2012, 7 pages. |
Ekeom, D. & Dubus, Bertrand & Volatier, A.. (2006). Solidly mounted resonator (SMR) FEM-BEM simulation. 1474-1477. 10.1109/ULTSYM.2006.371. |
Mizutaui, K. and Toda, K., “Analysis of lamb wave propagation characteristics in rotated Y-cut X-propagation LiNbO3 plates.” Electron. Comm. Jpn. Pt. 1, 69, No. 4 (1986): 47-55. doi:10.1002/ecja.4410690406. |
Naumenko et al., “Optimal orientations of Lithium Niobate for resonator SAW filters”, 2003 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium—pp. 2110-2113. (Year: 2003). |
Webster Dictionary Meaning of “diaphragm” Merriam Webster since 1828. |
Safari et al. “Piezoelectric for Transducer Applications” published by Elsevier Science Ltd., pp. 4 (Year: 2000). |
Moussa et al. Review on Triggered Liposomal Drug Delivery with a Focus on Ultrasound 2015, Bentham Science Publishers, pp. 16 (Year 2005). |
Acoustic Properties of Solids ONDA Corporation 592 Weddell Drive, Sunnyvale, CA 94089, Apr. 11, 2003, pp. 5 (Year 2003). |
Bahreynl, B. Fabrication and Design of Resonant Microdevices Andrew William, Inc. 2018, NY (Year 2008). |
Material Properties of Tibtech Innovations, © 2018 TIBTECH Innovations (Year 2018). |
Chen et al., “Development and Application of SAW Filter,” Micromachines, Apr. 20, 2022, vol. 13, No. 656, pp. 1-15. |
Hermann et al., “Properties of shear-horizontal surface acoustic waves in different layered quartz-SiO2 structures,” Ultrasonics, 1999, vol. 37, pp. 335-341. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2022/081068, dated Apr. 18, 2023, 17 pages. |
Kadota et al. “Ultra-Wideband Ladder Filter Using SH0 Plate Wave in Thin LiNbO3 Plate and Its Application to Tunable Filter”, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, May 2015, vol. 62, No. 5, pp. 939-946. |
Abass et al., “Effects of inhomogeneous grain size distribution in polycrystalline silicon solar cells,” Energy Procedia, 2011, vol. 10, pp. 55-60. |
Gnewuch et al., “Broadband monolithic acousto-optic tunable filter,” Optics Letters, Mar. 2000, vol. 25, No. 5, pp. 305-307. |
Gorisse et al., “Lateral Field Excitation of membrane-based Aluminum Nitride resonators,” 2011 Joint Conference of the IEEE International Frequency Control and the European Frequency and Time Forum (FCS) Proceedings, 2011, 5 pages. |
Pang et al., “Self-Aligned Lateral Field Excitation Film Acoustic Resonator with Very Large Electromechanical Coupling,” 2004 IEEE International Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control Joint 50th Anniversary Conference, 2004, pp. 558-561. |
Reinhardt et al., “Acoustic filters based on thin single crystal LiNbO3 films: status and prospects,” IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium, Sep. 2014, pp. 773-781. |
Xue et al., “High Q Lateral-Field-Excited Bulk Resonator Based on Single-Crystal LiTaO3 for 5G Wireless Communication,” Journal of Electron Devices Society, Mar. 2021, vol. 9, pp. 353-358. |
Yandrapalli et al., “Toward Band n78 Shear Bulk Accoustic Resonators Using Crystalline Y-Cut Lithium Niobate 7 Films wit Spurious Suppression,” Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems, Aug. 2023, vol. 32, No. 4, pp. 327-334. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210111703 A1 | Apr 2021 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62753815 | Oct 2018 | US | |
62748883 | Oct 2018 | US | |
62741702 | Oct 2018 | US | |
62701363 | Jul 2018 | US | |
62685825 | Jun 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16924108 | Jul 2020 | US |
Child | 17131348 | US | |
Parent | 16230443 | Dec 2018 | US |
Child | 16689707 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16689707 | Nov 2019 | US |
Child | 16924108 | US |