The following description relates to filtering channel responses for motion detection.
Motion detection systems have been used to detect movement, for example, of objects in a room or an outdoor area. In some example motion detection systems, infrared or optical sensors are used to detect movement of objects in the sensor's field of view. Motion detection systems have been used in security systems, automated control systems, and other types of systems.
In some aspects of what is described here, a wireless sensing system can process wireless signals (e.g., radio frequency signals) transmitted through a space between wireless communication devices for wireless sensing applications. Example wireless sensing applications include detecting motion, which can include one or more of the following: detecting motion of objects in the space, motion tracking, localization of motion in a space, breathing detection, breathing monitoring, presence detection, gesture detection, gesture recognition, human detection (e.g., moving and stationary human detection), human tracking, fall detection, speed estimation, intrusion detection, walking detection, step counting, respiration rate detection, sleep pattern detection, sleep quality monitoring, apnea estimation, posture change detection, activity recognition, gait rate classification, gesture decoding, sign language recognition, hand tracking, heart rate estimation, breathing rate estimation, room occupancy detection, human dynamics monitoring, and other types of motion detection applications. Other examples of wireless sensing applications include object recognition, speaking recognition, keystroke detection and recognition, tamper detection, touch detection, attack detection, user authentication, driver fatigue detection, traffic monitoring, smoking detection, school violence detection, human counting, metal detection, human recognition, bike localization, human queue estimation, Wi-Fi imaging, and other types of wireless sensing applications. For instance, the wireless sensing system may operate as a motion detection system to detect the existence and location of motion based on Wi-Fi signals or other types of wireless signals.
The examples described herein may be useful for home monitoring. In some instances, home monitoring using the wireless sensing systems described herein may provide several advantages, including full home coverage through walls and in darkness, discreet detection without cameras, higher accuracy and reduced false alerts (e.g., in comparison with sensors that do not use Wi-Fi signals to sense their environments), and adjustable sensitivity. By layering Wi-Fi motion detection capabilities into routers and gateways, a robust motion detection system may be provided.
The examples described herein may also be useful for wellness monitoring. Caregivers want to know their loved ones are safe, while seniors and people with special needs want to maintain their independence at home with dignity. Wellness monitoring using the wireless sensing systems described herein provide a solution that uses wireless signals to detect motion without using cameras or infringing on privacy, generates alerts when unusual activity is detected, tracks sleep patterns, and generates preventative health data. For example, caregivers can monitor motion, visits from health care professionals, and unusual behavior such as staying in bed longer than normal. Furthermore, motion is monitored unobtrusively without the need for wearable devices, and the wireless sensing systems described herein offer a more affordable and convenient alternative to assisted living facilities and other security and health monitoring tools.
The examples described herein may also be useful for setting up a smart home. In some examples, the wireless sensing systems described herein use predictive analytics and artificial intelligence (AI), to learn motion patterns and trigger smart home functions accordingly. Examples of smart home functions that may be triggered include adjusting the thermostat when a person walks through the front door, turning other smart devices on or off based on preferences, automatically adjusting lighting, adjusting HVAC systems based on present occupants, etc.
In some aspects of what is described here, a set of observed channel responses are obtained based on a set of wireless signals transmitted through a space (or propagation environment). Each of the wireless signals in the set of wireless signals that is transmitted in the environment may be an orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) signal, which can include, for example, a PHY frame. The PHY frame can, in some instances, include one or more Legacy PHY fields, one or more MIMO training fields, or both. Example Legacy PHY fields include a Legacy Long Training Field (L-LTF), a Legacy Short Training Field (L-STF), and other types of Legacy PHY fields. Example MIMO training fields include a High Efficiency Long Training Field (HE-LTF), a Very High-Throughput Long Training Field (VHT-LTF), a High-Throughput Long Training Field (HT-LTF), and other types of MIMO training fields. The fields in the PHY frames of the wireless signals in the set of wireless signals can be used to obtain the set of observed channel responses. In some instances, the set of observed channel response includes frequency-domain channel responses, and each frequency-domain channel response in the set of frequency-domain channel responses may correspond to a respective wireless signal in the set of wireless signals.
Motion of an object in the space can cause a change in one or more of the frequency-domain channel responses, and changes observed in the set of frequency-domain channel responses can be used to detect motion of an object within the space. In some instances, changes in the set of frequency-domain channel responses can be caused by device- or system-level impairments (e.g., noise or distortions) that are not related to changes in the physical environment (e.g., motion of an object in the space). For example, electronic impairments on the device-level or the system-level (or both) may cause a change in the set of frequency-domain channel responses. Therefore, impairments that are not related to changes in the physical environment (e.g., motion) can corrupt the set of frequency-domain channel responses. Consequently, motion detection errors (e.g., one or more false positives) can occur when motion of an object in the space is detected using the corrupted set of frequency-domain channel responses.
In some aspects of what is described here, each frequency-domain channel response from the set of observed frequency-domain channel responses is processed to filter out noise or distortions that are not related to changes in the physical environment. A result of the filtering operation is a set of reconstructed frequency-domain channel responses. In some aspects of what is described here, the filtering operation also generates a set of quality metrics, and each quality metric corresponds to a respective reconstructed frequency-domain channel response and a respective observed frequency-domain channel response. In some instances, the quality metric may be a measure of an extent to which the respective observed frequency-domain channel response has been corrupted by impairments that are not related to changes in the physical environment. Therefore, the quality metric may be analogous to a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the corresponding frequency-domain channel response. In some aspects of what is described here, motion is detected based on the set of observed frequency-domain channel responses. For example, motion can be detected by detecting changes in the set of reconstructed frequency-domain channel responses. In another example, motion can be detected by detecting changes in the set of observed frequency-domain channel responses when each of the quality metrics are greater than a predetermined threshold.
In some instances, aspects of the systems and techniques described here provide technical improvements and advantages over existing approaches. The systems and techniques described here can be used to increase the accuracy of a motion detection system. For example, the false positive rate of a motion detection system can be reduced by filtering out the effects of device- or system-level electronic impairments on the observed frequency-domain channel responses and by taking the quality metrics into account when detecting motion. The technical improvements and advantages achieved in examples where the wireless sensing system is used for motion detection may also be achieved in other examples where the wireless sensing system is used for other wireless sensing applications.
In some instances, a wireless sensing system can be implemented using a wireless communication network. Wireless signals received at one or more wireless communication devices in the wireless communication network may be analyzed to determine channel information for the different communication links (between respective pairs of wireless communication devices) in the network. The channel information may be representative of a physical medium that applies a transfer function to wireless signals that traverse a space. In some instances, the channel information includes a channel response. Channel responses can characterize a physical communication path, representing the combined effect of, for example, scattering, fading, and power decay within the space between the transmitter and receiver. In some instances, the channel information includes beamforming state information (e.g., a feedback matrix, a steering matrix, channel state information (CSI), etc.) provided by a beamforming system. Beamforming is a signal processing technique often used in multi antenna (multiple-input/multiple-output (MIMO)) radio systems for directional signal transmission or reception. Beamforming can be achieved by operating elements in an antenna array in such a way that signals at particular angles experience constructive interference while others experience destructive interference.
The channel information for each of the communication links may be analyzed by one or more motion detection algorithms (e.g., running on a hub device, a client device, or other device in the wireless communication network, or on a remote device communicably coupled to the network) to detect, for example, whether motion has occurred in the space, to determine a relative location of the detected motion, or both. In some aspects, the channel information for each of the communication links may be analyzed to detect whether an object is present or absent, e.g., when no motion is detected in the space.
In some instances, a motion detection system returns motion data. In some implementations, motion data is a result that is indicative of a degree of motion in the space, the location of motion in the space, a time at which the motion occurred, or a combination thereof. In some instances, the motion data can include a motion score, which may include, or may be, one or more of the following: a scalar quantity indicative of a level of signal perturbation in the environment accessed by the wireless signals; an indication of whether there is motion; an indication of whether there is an object present; or an indication or classification of a gesture performed in the environment accessed by the wireless signals.
In some implementations, the motion detection system can be implemented using one or more motion detection algorithms. Example motion detection algorithms that can be used to detect motion based on wireless signals include the techniques described in U.S. Pat. No. 9,523,760 entitled “Detecting Motion Based on Repeated Wireless Transmissions,” U.S. Pat. No. 9,584,974 entitled “Detecting Motion Based on Reference Signal Transmissions,” U.S. Pat. No. 10,051,414 entitled “Detecting Motion Based On Decompositions Of Channel Response Variations,” U.S. Pat. No. 10,048,350 entitled “Motion Detection Based on Groupings of Statistical Parameters of Wireless Signals,” U.S. Pat. No. 10,108,903 entitled “Motion Detection Based on Machine Learning of Wireless Signal Properties,” U.S. Pat. No. 10,109,167 entitled “Motion Localization in a Wireless Mesh Network Based on Motion Indicator Values,” U.S. Pat. No. 10,109,168 entitled “Motion Localization Based on Channel Response Characteristics,” U.S. Pat. No. 10,743,143 entitled “Determining a Motion Zone for a Location of Motion Detected by Wireless Signals,” U.S. Pat. No. 10,605,908 entitled “Motion Detection Based on Beamforming Dynamic Information from Wireless Standard Client Devices,” U.S. Pat. No. 10,605,907 entitled “Motion Detection by a Central Controller Using Beamforming Dynamic Information,” U.S. Pat. No. 10,600,314 entitled “Modifying Sensitivity Settings in a Motion Detection System,” U.S. Pat. No. 10,567,914 entitled “Initializing Probability Vectors for Determining a Location of Motion Detected from Wireless Signals,” U.S. Pat. No. 10,565,860 entitled “Offline Tuning System for Detecting New Motion Zones in a Motion Detection System,” U.S. Pat. No. 10,506,384 entitled “Determining a Location of Motion Detected from Wireless Signals Based on Prior Probability,” U.S. Pat. No. 10,499,364 entitled “Identifying Static Leaf Nodes in a Motion Detection System,” U.S. Pat. No. 10,498,467 entitled “Classifying Static Leaf Nodes in a Motion Detection System,” U.S. Pat. No. 10,460,581 entitled “Determining a Confidence for a Motion Zone Identified as a Location of Motion for Motion Detected by Wireless Signals,” U.S. Pat. No. 10,459,076 entitled “Motion Detection based on Beamforming Dynamic Information,” U.S. Pat. No. 10,459,074 entitled “Determining a Location of Motion Detected from Wireless Signals Based on Wireless Link Counting,” U.S. Pat. No. 10,438,468 entitled “Motion Localization in a Wireless Mesh Network Based on Motion Indicator Values,” U.S. Pat. No. 10,404,387 entitled “Determining Motion Zones in a Space Traversed by Wireless Signals,” U.S. Pat. No. 10,393,866 entitled “Detecting Presence Based on Wireless Signal Analysis,” U.S. Pat. No. 10,380,856 entitled “Motion Localization Based on Channel Response Characteristics,” U.S. Pat. No. 10,318,890 entitled “Training Data for a Motion Detection System using Data from a Sensor Device,” U.S. Pat. No. 10,264,405 entitled “Motion Detection in Mesh Networks,” U.S. Pat. No. 10,228,439 entitled “Motion Detection Based on Filtered Statistical Parameters of Wireless Signals,” U.S. Pat. No. 10,129,853 entitled “Operating a Motion Detection Channel in a Wireless Communication Network,” U.S. Pat. No. 10,111,228 entitled “Selecting Wireless Communication Channels Based on Signal Quality Metrics,” and other techniques.
The example wireless communication system 100 includes three wireless communication devices 102A, 102B, 102C. The example wireless communication system 100 may include additional wireless communication devices 102 and/or other components (e.g., one or more network servers, network routers, network switches, cables, or other communication links, etc.).
The example wireless communication devices 102A, 102B, 102C can operate in a wireless network, for example, according to a wireless network standard or another type of wireless communication protocol. For example, the wireless network may be configured to operate as a Wireless Local Area Network (WLAN), a Personal Area Network (PAN), a metropolitan area network (MAN), or another type of wireless network. Examples of WLANs include networks configured to operate according to one or more of the 802.11 family of standards developed by IEEE (e.g., Wi-Fi networks), and others. Examples of PANs include networks that operate according to short-range communication standards (e.g., BLUETOOTH®, Near Field Communication (NFC), ZigBee), millimeter wave communications, and others.
In some implementations, the wireless communication devices 102A, 102B, 102C may be configured to communicate in a cellular network, for example, according to a cellular network standard. Examples of cellular networks include: networks configured according to 2G standards such as Global System for Mobile (GSM) and Enhanced Data rates for GSM Evolution (EDGE) or EGPRS; 3G standards such as Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA), Wideband Code Division Multiple Access (WCDMA), Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS), and Time Division Synchronous Code Division Multiple Access (TD-SCDMA); 4G standards such as Long-Term Evolution (LTE) and LTE-Advanced (LTE-A); 5G standards, and others.
In some cases, one or more of the wireless communication devices 102 is a Wi-Fi access point or another type of wireless access point (WAP). In some cases, one or more of the wireless communication devices 102 is an access point of a wireless mesh network, such as, for example, a commercially-available mesh network system (e.g., GOOGLE Wi-Fi, EERO mesh, etc.). In some instances, one or more of the wireless communication devices 102 can be implemented as wireless access points (APs) in a mesh network, while the other wireless communication device(s) 102 are implemented as leaf devices (e.g., mobile devices, smart devices, etc.) that access the mesh network through one of the APs. In some cases, one or more of the wireless communication devices 102 is a mobile device (e.g., a smartphone, a smart watch, a tablet, a laptop computer, etc.), a wireless-enabled device (e.g., a smart thermostat, a Wi-Fi enabled camera, a smart TV), or another type of device that communicates in a wireless network.
In the example shown in
In the example shown in
In the example shown in
In some examples, the wireless signals propagate through a structure (e.g., a wall) before or after interacting with a moving object, which may allow the object's motion to be detected without an optical line-of-sight between the moving object and the transmission or receiving hardware. In some instances, the motion detection system may communicate the motion detection event to another device or system, such as a security system or a control center.
In some cases, the wireless communication devices 102 themselves are configured to perform one or more operations of the motion detection system, for example, by executing computer-readable instructions (e.g., software or firmware) on the wireless communication devices. For example, each device may process received wireless signals to detect motion based on changes in the communication channel. In some cases, another device (e.g., a remote server, a cloud-based computer system, a network-attached device, etc.) is configured to perform one or more operations of the motion detection system. For example, each wireless communication device 102 may send channel information to a specified device, system, or service that performs operations of the motion detection system.
In an example aspect of operation, wireless communication devices 102A, 102B may broadcast wireless signals or address wireless signals to the other wireless communication device 102C, and the wireless communication device 102C (and potentially other devices) receives the wireless signals transmitted by the wireless communication devices 102A, 102B. The wireless communication device 102C (or another system or device) then processes the received wireless signals to detect motion of an object in a space accessed by the wireless signals (e.g., in the zones 110A, 11B). In some instances, the wireless communication device 102C (or another system or device) may perform one or more operations of a motion detection system.
In some cases, a combination of one or more of the wireless communication devices 204A, 204B, 204C can be part of, or may be used by, a motion detection system. The example wireless communication devices 204A, 204B, 204C can transmit wireless signals through a space 200. The example space 200 may be completely or partially enclosed or open at one or more boundaries of the space 200. The space 200 can be or may include an interior of a room, multiple rooms, a building, an indoor area, outdoor area, or the like. A first wall 202A, a second wall 202B, and a third wall 202C at least partially enclose the space 200 in the example shown.
In the example shown in
As shown, an object is in a first position 214A at an initial time (t0) in
As shown in
In
The example wireless signals shown in
The transmitted signal can have a number of frequency components in a frequency bandwidth, and the transmitted signal may include one or more bands within the frequency bandwidth. The transmitted signal may be transmitted from the first wireless communication device 204A in an omnidirectional manner, in a directional manner, or otherwise. In the example shown, the wireless signals traverse multiple respective paths in the space 200, and the signal along each path can become attenuated due to path losses, scattering, reflection, or the like and may have a phase or frequency offset.
As shown in
In the example shown in
In the example shown in
In the example shown in
When the client devices 232 seek to connect to and associate with their respective APs 226, 228, the client devices 232 may go through an authentication and association phase with their respective APs 226, 228. Among other things, the association phase assigns address information (e.g., an association ID or another type of unique identifier) to each of the client devices 232. For example, within the IEEE 802.11 family of standards for Wi-Fi, each of the client devices 232 can identify itself using a unique address (e.g., a 48-bit address, an example being the MAC address), although the client devices 232 may be identified using other types of identifiers embedded within one or more fields of a message. The address information (e.g., MAC address or another type of unique identifier) can be either hardcoded and fixed, or randomly generated according to the network address rules at the start of the association process. Once the client devices 232 have associated to their respective APs 226, 228, their respective address information may remain fixed. Subsequently, a transmission by the APs 226, 228 or the client devices 232 typically includes the address information (e.g., MAC address) of the transmitting wireless device and the address information (e.g., MAC address) of the receiving device.
In the example shown in
In the example shown in
The motion detection system, which may include one or more motion detection or localization processes running on one or more of the client devices 232 or on one or more of the APs 226, 228, may collect and process data (e.g., channel information) corresponding to local links that are participating in the operation of the wireless sensing system. The motion detection system can be installed as a software or firmware application on the client devices 232 or on the APs 226, 228, or may be part of the operating systems of the client devices 232 or the APs 226, 228.
In some implementations, the APs 226, 228 do not contain motion detection software and are not otherwise configured to perform motion detection in the space 201. Instead, in such implementations, the operations of the motion detection system are executed on one or more of the client devices 232. In some implementations, the channel information may be obtained by the client devices 232 by receiving wireless signals from the APs 226, 228 (or possibly from other client devices 232) and processing the wireless signal to obtain the channel information. For example, the motion detection system running on the client devices 232 can have access to channel information provided by the client device's radio firmware (e.g., Wi-Fi radio firmware) so that channel information may be collected and processed.
In some implementations, the client devices 232 send a request to their corresponding AP 226, 228 to transmit wireless signals that can be used by the client device as motion probes to detect motion of objects in the space 201. The request sent to the corresponding AP 226, 228 may be a null data packet frame, a beamforming request, a ping, standard data traffic, or a combination thereof. In some implementations, the client devices 232 are stationary while performing motion detection in the space 201. In other examples, one or more of the client devices 232 can be mobile and may move within the space 201 while performing motion detection.
Mathematically, a signal f(t) transmitted from a wireless communication device (e.g., the wireless communication device 204A in
where ωn represents the frequency of nth frequency component of the transmitted signal, cn represents the complex coefficient of the nth frequency component, and t represents time. With the transmitted signal f(t) being transmitted, an output signal rk(t) from a path k may be described according to Equation (2):
where αn,k represents an attenuation factor (or channel response; e.g., due to scattering, reflection, and path losses) for the nth frequency component along path k, and ϕn,k represents the phase of the signal for nth frequency component along path k. Then, the received signal R at a wireless communication device can be described as the summation of all output signals rk (t) from all paths to the wireless communication device, which is shown in Equation (3):
Substituting Equation (2) into Equation (3) renders the following Equation (4):
The received signal R at a wireless communication device (e.g., the wireless communication devices 204B, 204C in
The complex value Yn for a given frequency component ωn indicates a relative magnitude and phase offset of the received signal at that frequency component ωn. The signal f(t) may be repeatedly transmitted within a time period, and the complex value Yn can be obtained for each transmitted signal f(t). When an object moves in the space, the complex value Yn changes over the time period due to the channel response αn,k of the space changing. Accordingly, a change detected in the channel response (and thus, the complex value KJ can be indicative of motion of an object within the communication channel. Conversely, a stable channel response may indicate lack of motion. Thus, in some implementations, the complex values Yn for each of multiple devices in a wireless network can be processed to detect whether motion has occurred in a space traversed by the transmitted signals f(t).
In another aspect of
In some implementations, for example, a steering matrix may be generated at a transmitter device (beamformer) based on a feedback matrix provided by a receiver device (beamformee) based on channel sounding. Because the steering and feedback matrices are related to propagation characteristics of the channel, these beamforming matrices change as objects move within the channel. Changes in the channel characteristics are accordingly reflected in these matrices, and by analyzing the matrices, motion can be detected, and different characteristics of the detected motion can be determined. In some implementations, a spatial map may be generated based on one or more beamforming matrices. The spatial map may indicate a general direction of an object in a space relative to a wireless communication device. In some cases, “modes” of a beamforming matrix (e.g., a feedback matrix or steering matrix) can be used to generate the spatial map. The spatial map may be used to detect the presence of motion in the space or to detect a location of the detected motion.
In some implementations, a space through which a set of wireless signals is transmitted may be described as a frequency-domain filter that applies a transfer function to the set of wireless signals. Changes observed in the frequency-domain filter over time can be indicative of motion of an object within the space.
In the example shown in
In the example shown in
The propagation environment represented by the signal paths shown in
In some instances, the time-domain filter h(t) may be referred to as a time-domain channel response, since the time-domain filter h(t) is the response of the propagation environment to a unit impulse transmitted by wireless communication device 302A at time t=0. In Equation (6), the integer k indexes the three signal paths, and the coefficients αk are complex phasors that represent the magnitude and phase of the scattering along each signal path. The values of the coefficients αk are determined by physical characteristics of the environment, for example, free space propagation and the type of scattering objects present. In some examples, increasing attenuation along a signal path (e.g., by an absorbing medium like a human body or otherwise) may generally decrease the magnitude of the corresponding coefficient αk. Similarly, a human body or another medium acting as a scatterer can change the magnitude and phase of the coefficients αk.
The time-domain representation of the filter h(t) may have additional or different pulses or other features. The number of pulses, as well as their respective locations on the time axis and their respective magnitudes, may vary according to the scattering profile of the environment. For example, if an object were to show up towards the end of the coverage area (e.g., at scatterer 310B), this may cause the third pulse (at time τ3) to move towards the left or the right. Typically, the first pulse (at time τ1) represents the earliest pulse or direct line of sight in most systems; accordingly, if an object were to come in the line of sight between transmitter and receiver, this pulse (at time τ1) would be affected. In some instances, distance and direction of motion (relative to the transmitter and receiver) in the propagation environment can be inferred by looking at the behavior of these pulses over time. As an example, in some instances, an object moving from the end of the coverage area towards the line of sight can affect the third, second, and first pulses in that order, while an object moving away from the line of sight to the end of the coverage area can affect the pulses in the opposite order.
Taking the Fourier transform of the time-domain channel response h(t) from Equation (6) provides a frequency representation of the filter:
In some instances, the frequency representation H(f) may be referred to as a frequency-domain channel response or the channel state information. In the frequency representation H(f) shown in Equation (7), each impulse from Equation (6) has been converted to a complex exponential (a sine and cosine wave). Each component of the exponential in the frequency domain has a specific frequency of rotation which is given by an associated pulse time τk with a certain phase.
In some implementations, each of the wireless signals in the set of wireless signals that is transmitted in the environment may be an orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) signal, which can include, for example, a PHY frame. The PHY frame can, in some instances, include one or more Legacy PHY fields (e.g., L-LTF, L-STF), one or more MIMO training fields (e.g., HE-LTF, VHT-LTF, HT-LTF), or both. The fields in the PHY frames of the wireless signals in the set of wireless signals can be used to obtain a set of observed frequency-domain channel responses {H1(f), H2(f), . . . , Hn(f)}. Each frequency-domain channel response Hi(f) in the set of frequency-domain channel responses {H1(f), H2 (f), . . . , Hn(f)} may correspond to a respective wireless signal in the set of wireless signals.
Motion of an object in the space (e.g., the environment between the wireless communication devices 302A, 302B) can cause a change in one or more frequency-domain channel responses in the set of frequency-domain channel responses {H1(f), H2 (f), . . . , Hn(f)}. For example, motion of an object in the space can cause one or more of the frequency-domain channel responses H1(f), H2(f), . . . , Hn(f) to experience a change in their coefficients αk, pulse times τk, or both. In some implementations, changes observed in at least one of the coefficients αk or pulse times τk in the set of frequency-domain channel responses {H1(f), H2(f), . . . , Hn(f)} can be used to detect motion of an object within the space. Conversely, a stable set of frequency-domain channel responses {H1(f), H2(f), . . . , Hn(f)} may indicate lack of motion.
In some instances, changes in the coefficients αk or pulse times τk of a frequency-domain channel response Hi(f) can be caused by device- or system-level impairments (e.g., noise or distortions) that are not related to changes in the physical environment (e.g., motion of an object in the space). For example, electronic impairments on the device-level or the system-level (or both) may cause a change in the coefficients αk or pulse times τk of one or more frequency-domain channel responses in the set of frequency-domain channel responses {H1(f), H2(f), . . . , Hn(f)}. Example device- or system-level electronic impairments include one or more carrier frequency offsets between the transmitter (e.g., the wireless communication device 302A) and the receiver (e.g., the wireless communication device 302B), phase noise in the radio subsystem or baseband subsystem of the transmitter or receiver, a delay in packet detection at the receiver, imperfect convergence of an automatic gain control loop of an amplifier (or a chain of amplifiers) in the transmitter or receiver, timing drifts in electronic components in the transmitter or receiver, non-linearity in the measurement noise of the transmitter or receiver, interference from neighboring transmitters, or other types of device- or system-level electronic impairments in a wireless communication system.
Impairments that are not related to changes in the physical environment (e.g., motion) can corrupt the set of frequency-domain channel responses {H1(f), H2 (f), . . . , Hn(f)}, and motion detection errors can occur when motion is detected using the corrupted set of frequency-domain channel responses {H1(f), H2(f), . . . , Hn(f)}. For example, even when there is no motion in the space, electronic impairments can cause a change in the coefficients αk or pulse times τk of one or more frequency-domain channel responses, which in turn can lead to an erroneous indication that motion has occurred in the space (e.g., one or more false positives).
As shown in
The system 500 includes a frequency-to-time converter block 502 that transforms the frequency-domain channel response Hi(f) to its corresponding time-domain channel response hi(t). In some implementations, the frequency-to-time converter block 502 may implement a Fourier transform, an inverse Fourier transform, or another type of transformation that converts a frequency-domain signal to its corresponding time-domain signal. In some implementations, such as in the example shown in
The system 500 includes an adaptive constrained solver 504 that accepts the time-domain channel response hi(t) as an input. In some implementations, the adaptive constrained solver 504 executes an iterative constrained least squares optimization process that minimizes an error between the observed frequency-domain channel response Hi(f) and the reconstructed frequency-domain channel response Ĥi(f). The adaptive constrained solver 504 generates a filtered time-domain channel response ĥi(t) as an output.
The adaptive constrained solver 504 may impose one or more constraints in the time-domain. Specifically, the adaptive constrained solver 504 may impose one or more constraints on the time-domain channel response hi(t) or a filtered time-domain channel response ĥi(t) obtained from a previous iteration of the iterative constrained least squares optimization process. The one or more constraints may be a constraint on the coefficients αk of the pulses in the time-domain channel response hi(t) or the filtered time-domain channel response ĥi(t) obtained from a previous iteration. Additionally or alternatively, the one or more constraints may be a constraint on the pulse times τk in the time-domain channel response hi(t) or the filtered time-domain channel response ĥi(t) obtained from a previous iteration.
In some instances, the one or more constraints may be representative of the propagation environment in which the wireless communication system operates and is indicative of scattering along signal paths in the propagation environment. Therefore, by imposing the one or more constraints on the time-domain channel response hi(t), the system 500 filters out, from the time-domain channel response hi(t), noise or distortions that may not be related to changes in the physical environment.
In some implementations, the one or more constraints are model-based constraints that are known by the system 500 a priori and may depend, at least in part, on the standard path loss propagation model that most accurately models the propagation environment in which the wireless communication system operates. For example, the one or more constraints may depend, at least in part, on propagation loss in the space, the type of wireless communication devices operating in the propagation environment, a model of the propagation environment (e.g., indoor, outdoor, urban area, rural area, etc.), and potentially other factors. Example standard path loss propagation models that may affect the one or more constraints used by the system 500 include the free space path loss model, the Okumura model, the Hata path loss model, the Hata-Okumura path loss model, the Hata-Okumura Extended path loss model, the COST 231 Extended Hata path loss model, the Walfisch-Ikegami model, the Stanford University Interim (SUI) path loss model, or other types of path loss models.
In some instances, the adaptive constrained solver 504 may impose a constraint 612 on a time duration (e.g., maximum time duration) of the time-domain channel response hi(t) (as seen in the example of
In some implementations, the system 500 operates based on the premise that pulses outside of the respective constraints 612, 614 are caused, at least in part, by impairments (e.g., noise or distortions) that may not be related to changes in the physical environment. Therefore, in some instances, pulses that are within the respective constraints 612, 614 are retained, while pulses that are outside of the respective constraints 612, 614 are ignored or discarded. As an illustration, in the example of
The system 500 includes a time-to-frequency converter block 506 that transforms the filtered time-domain channel response ĥi(t) to its corresponding reconstructed frequency-domain channel response Ĥi(f). The reconstructed frequency-domain channel response Ĥi(f) may represent a filtered version of its corresponding observed frequency-domain channel response Hi(f). In some implementations, the time-to-frequency converter block 506 may implement a Fourier transform, an inverse Fourier transform, or another type of transformation that converts a time-domain signal to its corresponding frequency-domain signal.
The system 500 includes an error calculation block 508 that accepts the observed frequency-domain channel response Hi(f) and its corresponding reconstructed frequency-domain channel response Ĥi(f) as inputs. In some implementations, the error calculation block 508 generates an error signal Ei(f) that is indicative of a difference between the observed frequency-domain channel response Hi(f) and the reconstructed frequency-domain channel response Ĥi(f). In some implementations, the error signal Ei(f) may be generated by subtracting the observed frequency-domain channel response Hi(f) from the reconstructed frequency-domain channel response Ĥi(f), or vice versa.
The system 500 includes a decision block 510 that accepts the error signal Ei(f) and the filtered time-domain channel response ĥi(t) as inputs. In some implementations, when the filtered time-domain channel response ĥi(t) provided to the decision block 510 is produced in a first iteration of the adaptive constrained solver 504, the decision block 510 provides the filtered time-domain channel response ĥi(t) from the first iteration and its corresponding error signal Ei(f) to the adaptive constrained solver 504 so that the adaptive constrained solver 504 can execute another iteration of the constrained least squares optimization process. In the subsequent iteration, the adaptive constrained solver 504 generates an updated time-domain channel response ĥi(t) based on the filtered time-domain channel response from the first iteration, the error signal Ei(f) from the first iteration, and the one or more constraints.
In some implementations, in the second iteration, the adaptive constrained solver 504 analyzes a characteristic of the error signal Ei(f) from the first iteration and estimates one or more pulses in the time-domain that satisfy the one or more constraints and that correlate with the characteristic of error signal Ei(f) from the first iteration. The adaptive constrained solver 504 then inserts the estimated pulse or pulses into the time-domain channel response from the first iteration to produce the updated time-domain channel response ĥi(t). In some implementations, the characteristic of the error signal Ei(f) includes a rate of decay of the error signal Ei(f) as a function of frequency, an average rate at which the error signal Ei(f) varies over frequency, or another characteristic of error signal Ei(f). As an example, in some implementations, the mean square of the error signal Ei(f), commonly referred to as the L2 norm, can be used as an optimization criterion. Additionally or alternatively, the L1 norm of the error signal Ei(f) can be used as an optimization criterion depending on the internal assumptions about the form of the indoor channel response.
The one or more pulses that are estimated by the adaptive constrained solver 504 are checked to determine whether they satisfy the one or more constraints. When the estimated pulse(s) satisfy the one or more constraints, the estimated pulse(s) are inserted into the time-domain channel response from the first iteration to produce the updated time-domain channel response ĥi(t). Conversely, when the estimated pulse(s) does not satisfy the one or more constraints, the estimated pulse(s) are not inserted into the time-domain channel response from the first iteration. In the examples of
The updated time-domain channel response ĥi(t) is provided to the time-to-frequency converter block 506 to transform the updated time-domain channel response ĥi(t) to its corresponding updated reconstructed frequency-domain channel response Ĥi(f). The error calculation block 508 accepts the observed frequency-domain channel response Hi(f) and the updated reconstructed frequency-domain channel response Ĥi(f) as inputs, and generates the error signal Ei(f) for the second iteration of the adaptive constrained solver 504. In some implementations, the error signal Ei(f) for the second iteration is indicative of a difference between the observed frequency-domain channel response Hi(f) and the updated reconstructed frequency-domain channel response Ĥi(f).
In some implementations, when the updated time-domain channel response ĥi(t) provided to the decision block 510 is produced in a second or subsequent iteration of the adaptive constrained solver 504, the decision block 510 determines whether a further iteration of the adaptive constrained solver 504 is needed. In some instances, this determination is based on whether the error signal Ei(f) from that iteration satisfies a criterion. For example, in some implementations, the decision block 510 may determine whether the power of the error signal Ei(f) is less than a predetermined threshold (e.g., when the error signal Ei(f) has decayed to more than 15 dB below the signal power, where the signal power is given as the root mean square of all the frequency bins in the channel). As another example, the decision block 510 may determine whether a difference between the power of the error signals Ei(f) from the current iteration and a preceding iteration (e.g., immediately preceding iteration) is less than a predetermined threshold (e.g., the error signals differ by about 1% to about 5%). In some instances, the power of the error signal Ei(f) can be determined by integrating the squared magnitude of the error signal Ei(f) over the frequency bands used by a wireless communication system.
In response to a determination that the error signal Ei(f) from a second or subsequent iteration does not satisfy the criterion, the adaptive constrained solver 504 executes another iteration. Specifically, the adaptive constrained solver 504 generates an updated time-domain channel response ĥi(t) based on the filtered time-domain channel response from the previous iteration, the error signal Ei(f) from the previous iteration, and the one or more constraints, as discussed above in the example of the adaptive constrained solver 504 executing a second iteration. In some instances, the adaptive constrained solver 504 repeats the generation of the updated time-domain channel response ĥi(t), the updated reconstructed frequency-domain channel response Ĥi(f), and the error signal Ei(f) until the error signal Ei(f) satisfies the criterion.
In response to a determination that the error signal Ei(f) from a second or subsequent iteration satisfies the criterion, the decision block 510 provides the most recent reconstructed frequency-domain channel response Ĥi(f), the most recent error signal Ei(f), and the observed frequency-domain channel response Hi(f) to a quality metric calculation block 512. In some implementations, the quality metric calculation block 512 generates a quality metric μi associated with the reconstructed frequency-domain channel response Ĥi(f) and the observed frequency-domain channel response Hi(f). In some instances, the quality metric μi may be a measure of an extent to which the observed frequency-domain channel response Hi(f) has been corrupted by impairments that are not related to changes in the physical environment. Therefore, the quality metric μi may be analogous to the SNR of the corresponding frequency-domain channel response Hi(f). In some implementations, a high quality metric μi (e.g., when the quality metric μi is greater than a predetermined threshold) may indicate that the corresponding observed frequency-domain channel response Hi(f) has been corrupted to a low degree by impairments that are not related to changes in the physical environment. Conversely, a low quality metric μi (e.g., when the quality metric μi is less than a predetermined threshold) may indicate that the corresponding observed frequency-domain channel response Hi(f) has been corrupted to a high degree by impairments that are not related to changes in the physical environment.
In some implementations, the quality metric μi may be a ratio of a power of the observed frequency-domain channel response Hi(f) to a power of the error signal Ei(f). The power of the observed frequency-domain channel response Hi(f) may be the total power of the observed frequency-domain channel response Hi(f) integrated over all frequencies of interest (e.g., the frequency bands used by a wireless communication system). Similarly, the power of the error signal Ei(f) may be the total power of the error signal E(f) integrated over all frequencies of interest. The quality metric μi may be expressed in linear form, in decibels, or another appropriate representation.
The iterative operations performed by the system 500 on the observed frequency-domain channel response Hi(f) minimizes the error between the reconstructed frequency-domain channel response Ĥi(f) and the observed frequency-domain channel response Hi(f), while being constrained by the propagation environment in which the wireless communication system operates. In some implementations, the iterative constrained least squares optimization process performed by the system 500 may be expressed as:
In some implementations, the one or more constraints imposed by the adaptive constrained solver 504 may be reflected in the matrix AF. For example, supposing the wireless communication system operates at frequencies f1, f2, . . . , fM, and the one or more constraints indicate that the propagation environment in which the wireless communication system operates can be modeled with a pulse at a pulse time τ1 having a coefficient α1, a pulse at a (later) pulse time τ2 having a coefficient α2, and so on until a pulse at a (later) pulse time τK having a coefficient αK. Then, in some instances, the matrix AF can be expressed as:
The constrained least squares solution to Equations (8) and (9) can, in some instances, be expressed as:
wopt=(AFTAF)−1AFTHi (10)
where the matrix AFT is the transpose of the matrix AF. The optimal reconstructed frequency-domain channel response Ĥi(f) is then given by Ĥi(f)=AFwopt, as an example.
The operations of the system 500 are performed for each frequency-domain channel response from the set of observed frequency-domain channel responses {H1(f), H2(f), . . . , Hn(f)}, thus generating the set of reconstructed frequency-domain channel responses {Ĥ1(f), Ĥ2(f), . . . , Ĥn(f)} and the set of quality metrics {μ1, μ2, . . . , μn}. In some implementations, the set of observed frequency-domain channel responses {H1(f), H2 (f), . . . , Hn(f)}, the set of reconstructed frequency-domain channel responses {Ĥ1(f), Ĥ2(f), . . . , Ĥn(f)}, and the set of quality metrics {μ1, μ2, . . . , μn} are provided to a motion detection engine 514 that detects motion based on the set of observed frequency-domain channel responses {H1(f), H2 (f), . . . , Hn(f)}.
For example, the motion detection engine 514 may detect motion using the set of reconstructed frequency-domain channel responses {Ĥi(f), Ĥ2(f), . . . , Ĥn(f)}. In some implementations, the motion detection engine 512 may detect motion of an object in a space by analyzing changes in the set of reconstructed frequency-domain channel responses {Ĥi(f), Ĥ2(f), . . . , Ĥn(f)}. Since the effects of device- or system-level electronic impairments on the observed frequency-domain channel responses {H1(f), H2 (f), . . . , Hn(f)} have been filtered out, thus yielding the set of reconstructed frequency-domain channel responses {Ĥ1(f), Ĥ2(f), . . . , Ĥn(f)}, motion detection that is based on the set of reconstructed frequency-domain channel responses {Ĥ1(f), Ĥ2(f), . . . , Ĥn(f)} more accurately represents changes (e.g., motion) in the physical environment, thus reducing the false positive rate of a motion detection system.
As another example, the motion detection engine 514 may detect motion using the set of observed frequency-domain channel responses {H1(f), H2(f), . . . , Hn(f)} and the set of quality metrics {μ1, μ2, . . . , μn}. In some implementations, the motion detection engine 514 may detect motion using the set of observed frequency-domain channel responses {H1(f), H2(f), . . . , Hn(f)} when the set of quality metrics {μ1, μ2, . . . , μn} indicates that the set of observed frequency-domain channel responses {H1(f), H2 (f), . . . , Hn(f)} has been corrupted to a low degree by impairments that are not related to changes in the physical environment. In some instances, the motion detection system can reject the set of observed frequency-domain channel responses {H1(f), H2(f), . . . , Hn(f)} when at least one of the quality metrics {μ1, μ2, . . . , μn} indicates that the set of observed frequency-domain channel responses {H1(f), H2(f), . . . , Hn(f)} has been corrupted to a high degree by impairments that are not related to changes in the physical environment (e.g., when at least one quality metric is below a predetermined threshold, which may be in a range from about 10 dB to about 15 dB). Consequently, the corrupted set of observed frequency-domain channel responses {H1(f), H2(f), . . . , Hn(f)} is precluded from being used in a motion detection system. In such instances, the system 500 may process a subsequently received set of frequency-domain channel responses, and the motion detection engine 514 may detect motion based on the subsequently received set of frequency-domain channel responses. Consequently, motion detection that is based on the set of observed frequency-domain channel responses {H1(f), H2 (f), . . . , Hn(f)} when each quality metric μi in the set of quality metrics {μ1, μ2, . . . , μn} is above a predetermined threshold (e.g., which may be in a range from about 10 dB to about 15 dB) can more accurately represent changes (e.g., motion) in the physical environment, thus reducing the false positive rate of a motion detection system.
The example process 900 may include additional or different operations, and the operations may be performed in the order shown or in another order. In some cases, one or more of the operations shown in
At 902, a set of observed frequency-domain channel responses {H1(f), H2 (f), . . . , Hn(f)} is obtained based on a set of wireless signals transmitted through a space (e.g. the propagation environment shown in
In some implementations, each frequency-domain channel response Hi(f) from the set of observed frequency-domain channel responses {H1(f), H2(f), . . . , Hn(f)} is processed using operations 904, 906, 908, 910, 912. Specifically, at 904, a time-domain channel response hi(t) is generated based on the frequency-domain channel response Hi(f). In some instances, the time-domain channel response hi(t) is generated using a frequency-to-time converter (e.g., the frequency-to-time converter 502 shown in the example of
At 906, a filtered time-domain channel response ĥi(t) is generated based on a constraint applied to the time-domain channel response hi(t). In some implementations, a constrained least squares optimization process may be used to generate the filtered time-domain channel response ĥi(t). The constrained least squares optimization process can, in some instances, be executed by a constrained solver (e.g., the constrained solver 504 shown in the example of
At 908, a reconstructed frequency-domain channel response Ĥi(f) is generated based on the filtered time-domain channel response ĥi(t). In some implementations, the reconstructed frequency-domain channel response Ĥi(f) is generated using a time-to-frequency converter (e.g., the time-to-frequency converter 506 shown in the example of
At 910, an error signal Ei(f) is generated. The error signal Ei(f) may be indicative of a difference between the observed frequency-domain channel response Hi(f) and the reconstructed frequency-domain channel response Ĥi(f). In some instances, such as in the example of
At 912, a determination is made as to whether the error signal Ei(f) satisfies a criterion. As an example, the power of the error signal Ei(f) can be determined, and operation 912 may determine whether the power of the error signal Ei(f) is less than a predetermined threshold (e.g., which may be in a range from about 10 dB to about 15 dB below the signal power. where the signal power is the root mean square power of all the frequency bins). As another example, the operation 912 may determine whether a difference between the power of the error signals Ei(f) from the current iteration of the constrained least squares optimization process and a preceding iteration (e.g., immediately preceding iteration) of the constrained least squares optimization process is less than a predetermined threshold (e.g., the error signals differ by about 1% to about 5%). In some implementations, operation 912 may be performed by a decision block (e.g., the decision block 510 shown in
In response to a determination that the respective error signals Ei(f) do not satisfy the criterion, operations 906, 908, 910 are iterated. Specifically, in a subsequent iteration of operations 906, 908, 910, an updated time-domain channel response ĥi(t) is generated based on the filtered time-domain channel response from the preceding iteration, the error signal Ei(f) from the preceding iteration, and the constraint. An updated reconstructed frequency-domain channel response Ĥi(f) is then generated based on the updated time-domain channel response ĥi(t), and the error signal Ei(f) for the current iteration is generated based on a difference between the updated reconstructed frequency-domain channel response Ĥi(f) and the observed frequency-domain channel response Hi(f).
In response to a determination that the respective error signals Ei(f) do not satisfy the criterion, a determination is made (e.g., at 914) as to whether all frequency-domain channel responses from the set of observed frequency-domain channel responses {H1(f), H2 (f), . . . , Hn(f)} have been processed to filter out noise or distortions that are not related to changes in the physical environment. In response to a determination that all frequency-domain channel responses from the set of observed frequency-domain channel responses {H1(f), H2(f), . . . , Hn(f)} have not been processed, the next frequency-domain channel response Hi+1(f) from the set of observed frequency-domain channel responses {H1(f), H2 (f), . . . , Hn(f)} is obtained (at 916), and process 900 is performed on the next frequency-domain channel response Hi+1(f) starting at 904. In response to a determination that all frequency-domain channel responses from the set of observed frequency-domain channel responses {H1(f), H2(f), . . . , Hn(f)} have been processed, motion is detected (at 918) based on the set of observed frequency-domain channel responses {H1(f), H2(f), . . . , Hn(f)}.
In an example of operation 918, motion may be detected using the set of reconstructed frequency-domain channel responses {Ĥ1(f), Ĥ2(f), . . . , Ĥn(f)}. In some implementations, motion of an object in a space may be detected by analyzing changes in the set of reconstructed frequency-domain channel responses {Ĥ1(f), Ĥ2(f), . . . , Ĥn(f)}. Since the effects of device- or system-level electronic impairments on the observed frequency-domain channel responses {H1(f), H2(f), . . . , Hn(f)} have been filtered out, thus yielding the set of reconstructed frequency-domain channel responses {Ĥ1(f), Ĥ2(f), . . . , Ĥn(f)}, motion detection that is based on the set of reconstructed frequency-domain channel responses {Ĥ1(f), Ĥ2(f), . . . , Ĥn(f)} more accurately represents changes (e.g., motion) in the physical environment, thus reducing the false positive rate of a motion detection system.
In another example of operation 918, motion may be detected using the set of observed frequency-domain channel responses {H1(f), H2(f), . . . , Hn(f)} and a set of quality metrics {μ1, μ2, . . . , μn}. In some implementations, a respective quality metric μi may be a ratio of a power of the respective observed frequency-domain channel response Hi(f) to a power of the respective error signal Ei(f). In some instances, the quality metric μi may be a measure of an extent to which the observed frequency-domain channel response Hi(f) has been corrupted by impairments that are not related to changes in the physical environment. In some implementations, the motion detection engine 514 may detect motion using the set of observed frequency-domain channel responses {H1(f), H2 (f), . . . , Hn(f)} when each quality metric in the set of quality metrics {μ1, μ2, . . . , μn} is above a predetermined threshold (which may be in a range from about 10 dB to about 15 dB). In some implementations, when at least one quality metric in the set of quality metrics {μ1, μ2, . . . , μn} is below a predetermined threshold (which may be in a range from about 10 dB to about 15 dB), the set of observed frequency-domain channel responses {H1(f), H2 (f), . . . , Hn(f)} can be discarded, and the motion detection system may detect motion based on the subsequently received set of frequency-domain channel responses. Consequently, motion detection that is based on the set of observed frequency-domain channel responses {H1(f), H2 (f), . . . , Hn(f)} when each quality metric μi in the set of quality metrics {μ1, μ2, . . . , μn} is above the predetermined threshold more accurately represents changes (e.g., motion) in the physical environment, thus reducing the false positive rate of a motion detection system.
The example interface 1030 can communicate (receive, transmit, or both) wireless signals. For example, the interface 1030 may be configured to communicate radio frequency (RF) signals formatted according to a wireless communication standard (e.g., Wi-Fi, 4G, 5G, Bluetooth, etc.). In some implementations, the example interface 1030 includes a radio subsystem and a baseband subsystem. The radio subsystem may include, for example, one or more antennas and radio frequency circuitry. The radio subsystem can be configured to communicate radio frequency wireless signals on the wireless communication channels. As an example, the radio subsystem may include a radio chip, an RF front end, and one or more antennas. The baseband subsystem may include, for example, digital electronics configured to process digital baseband data. In some cases, the baseband subsystem may include a digital signal processor (DSP) device or another type of processor device. In some cases, the baseband system includes digital processing logic to operate the radio subsystem, to communicate wireless network traffic through the radio subsystem or to perform other types of processes.
The example processor 1010 can execute instructions, for example, to generate output data based on data inputs. The instructions can include programs, codes, scripts, modules, or other types of data stored in memory 1020. Additionally or alternatively, the instructions can be encoded as pre-programmed or re-programmable logic circuits, logic gates, or other types of hardware or firmware components or modules. The processor 1010 may be or include a general-purpose microprocessor, as a specialized co-processor or another type of data processing apparatus. In some cases, the processor 1010 performs high level operation of the wireless communication device 1000. For example, the processor 1010 may be configured to execute or interpret software, scripts, programs, functions, executables, or other instructions stored in the memory 1020. In some implementations, the processor 1010 may be included in the interface 1030 or another component of the wireless communication device 1000.
The example memory 1020 may include computer-readable storage media, for example, a volatile memory device, a non-volatile memory device, or both. The memory 1020 may include one or more read-only memory devices, random-access memory devices, buffer memory devices, or a combination of these and other types of memory devices. In some instances, one or more components of the memory can be integrated or otherwise associated with another component of the wireless communication device 1000. The memory 1020 may store instructions that are executable by the processor 1010. For example, the instructions may include instructions to perform one or more of the operations in the example process 900 shown in
The example power unit 1040 provides power to the other components of the wireless communication device 1000. For example, the other components may operate based on electrical power provided by the power unit 1040 through a voltage bus or other connection. In some implementations, the power unit 1040 includes a battery or a battery system, for example, a rechargeable battery. In some implementations, the power unit 1040 includes an adapter (e.g., an AC adapter) that receives an external power signal (from an external source) and coverts the external power signal to an internal power signal conditioned for a component of the wireless communication device 1000. The power unit 1020 may include other components or operate in another manner.
Some of the subject matter and operations described in this specification can be implemented in digital electronic circuitry, or in computer software, firmware, or hardware, including the structures disclosed in this specification and their structural equivalents, or in combinations of one or more of them. Some of the subject matter described in this specification can be implemented as one or more computer programs, i.e., one or more modules of computer program instructions, encoded on a computer storage medium for execution by, or to control the operation of, data-processing apparatus. A computer storage medium can be, or can be included in, a computer-readable storage device, a computer-readable storage substrate, a random or serial access memory array or device, or a combination of one or more of them. Moreover, while a computer storage medium is not a propagated signal, a computer storage medium can be a source or destination of computer program instructions encoded in an artificially generated propagated signal. The computer storage medium can also be, or be included in, one or more separate physical components or media (e.g., multiple CDs, disks, or other storage devices).
Some of the operations described in this specification can be implemented as operations performed by a data processing apparatus on data stored on one or more computer-readable storage devices or received from other sources.
The term “data-processing apparatus” encompasses all kinds of apparatus, devices, and machines for processing data, including by way of example a programmable processor, a computer, a system on a chip, or multiple ones, or combinations, of the foregoing. The apparatus can include special purpose logic circuitry, e.g., an FPGA (field programmable gate array) or an ASIC (application specific integrated circuit). The apparatus can also include, in addition to hardware, code that creates an execution environment for the computer program in question, e.g., code that constitutes processor firmware, a protocol stack, a database management system, an operating system, a cross-platform runtime environment, a virtual machine, or a combination of one or more of them.
A computer program (also known as a program, software, software application, script, or code) can be written in any form of programming language, including compiled or interpreted languages, declarative or procedural languages, and it can be deployed in any form, including as a stand-alone program or as a module, component, subroutine, object, or other unit suitable for use in a computing environment. A computer program may, but need not, correspond to a file in a file system. A program can be stored in a portion of a file that holds other programs or data (e.g., one or more scripts stored in a markup language document), in a single file dedicated to the program, or in multiple coordinated files (e.g., files that store one or more modules, sub programs, or portions of code). A computer program can be deployed to be executed on one computer or on multiple computers that are located at one site or distributed across multiple sites and interconnected by a communication network.
Some of the processes and logic flows described in this specification can be performed by one or more programmable processors executing one or more computer programs to perform actions by operating on input data and generating output. The processes and logic flows can also be performed by, and apparatus can also be implemented as, special purpose logic circuitry, e.g., an FPGA (field programmable gate array) or an ASIC (application specific integrated circuit).
To provide for interaction with a user, operations can be implemented on a computer having a display device (e.g., a monitor, or another type of display device) for displaying information to the user and a keyboard and a pointing device (e.g., a mouse, a trackball, a tablet, a touch sensitive screen, or another type of pointing device) by which the user can provide input to the computer. Other kinds of devices can be used to provide for interaction with a user as well; for example, feedback provided to the user can be any form of sensory feedback, e.g., visual feedback, auditory feedback, or tactile feedback; and input from the user can be received in any form, including acoustic, speech, or tactile input. In addition, a computer can interact with a user by sending documents to and receiving documents from a device that is used by the user; for example, by sending web pages to a web browser on a user's client device in response to requests received from the web browser.
In a general aspect, channel responses are filtered for motion detection.
In a first example, a method includes obtaining a set of frequency-domain channel responses based on a set of wireless signals transmitted through a space. Each of the frequency-domain channel responses may correspond to a respective wireless signal of the set of wireless signals. The method generates, for each frequency-domain channel response: a time-domain channel response based on the frequency-domain channel response; a filtered time-domain channel response based on a constraint applied to the time-domain channel response; a reconstructed frequency-domain channel response based on the filtered time-domain channel response; and an error signal indicative of a difference between the frequency-domain channel response and the reconstructed frequency-domain channel response. The method also includes determining whether the error signal satisfies a criterion. In response to each of the error signals satisfying the criterion, the method detects motion of an object in the space based on the set of frequency-domain channel responses.
Implementations of the first example may include one or more of the following features. For at least one of the frequency-domain channel responses and in response to the error signal not satisfying the criterion, the method includes: generating an updated time-domain channel response based on the filtered time-domain channel response, the error signal, and the constraint; generating an updated reconstructed frequency-domain channel response based on the updated time-domain channel response; regenerating the error signal based on a difference between the frequency-domain channel response and the updated reconstructed frequency-domain channel response; and repeating generation of the updated time-domain channel response, the updated reconstructed frequency-domain channel response, and the error signal until the error signal satisfies the criterion. The constraint may include a constraint on a time duration of the time-domain channel response. The constraint may include a constraint on amplitudes of the time-domain channel response. In some implementations, detecting, in response to each of the error signals satisfying the criterion, the motion of the object in the space based on the set of frequency-domain channel responses includes detecting the motion based on the reconstructed frequency-domain channel responses. In some implementations, detecting, in response to each of the error signals satisfying the criterion, the motion of the object in the space based on the set of frequency-domain channel responses includes detecting the motion of the object based on the set of frequency-domain channel responses and a set of quality metrics. Each of the frequency-domain channel responses may correspond to a respective quality metric of the set of quality metrics. In some implementations, the method includes determining, for each frequency-domain channel response, the corresponding quality metric based on the error signal. In some implementations, the corresponding quality metric includes a ratio of a power of the frequency-domain channel response to a power of the error signal. The set of wireless signals can include, or be, a set of orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) signals, and each of the frequency-domain channel responses may be based on one or more training fields in a PHY frame of a corresponding OFDM signal of the set of OFDM signals. The set of wireless signals may be formatted according to a wireless communication standard.
In a second example, a non-transitory computer-readable medium stores instructions that are operable when executed by data processing apparatus to perform one or more operations of the first example. In a third example, a system includes a plurality of wireless communication devices and a computer device configured to perform one or more operations of the first example.
Implementations of the third example may include one or more of the following features. One of the wireless communication devices can be or include the computer device. The computer device can be located remote from the wireless communication devices.
While this specification contains many details, these should not be understood as limitations on the scope of what may be claimed, but rather as descriptions of features specific to particular examples. Certain features that are described in this specification or shown in the drawings in the context of separate implementations can also be combined. Conversely, various features that are described or shown in the context of a single implementation can also be implemented in multiple embodiments separately or in any suitable subcombination.
Similarly, while operations are depicted in the drawings in a particular order, this should not be understood as requiring that such operations be performed in the particular order shown or in sequential order, or that all illustrated operations be performed, to achieve desirable results. In certain circumstances, multitasking and parallel processing may be advantageous. Moreover, the separation of various system components in the implementations described above should not be understood as requiring such separation in all implementations, and it should be understood that the described program components and systems can generally be integrated together in a single product or packaged into multiple products.
A number of embodiments have been described. Nevertheless, it will be understood that various modifications can be made. Accordingly, other embodiments are within the scope of the following claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 17/106,989, filed Nov. 30, 2020, and entitled “Filtering Channel Responses for Motion Detection,” the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4054879 | Wright et al. | Oct 1977 | A |
4636774 | Galvin et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4649388 | Atlas | Mar 1987 | A |
4740045 | Goodson et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
5270720 | Stove | Dec 1993 | A |
5613039 | Wang et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5696514 | Nathanson et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
6075797 | Thomas | Jun 2000 | A |
6380882 | Hegnauer | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6573861 | Hommel et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6636763 | Junker et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6914854 | Heberley et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
7652617 | Kurtz et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7742753 | Carrero et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
8463191 | Farajidana et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8660578 | Yang et al. | Feb 2014 | B1 |
8671069 | Chang et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8710984 | Wilson et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8760392 | Lloyd et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8812654 | Gelvin et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8832244 | Gelvin et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8836344 | Habib et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8836503 | Gelvin et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8934884 | Gustafsson et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
9019148 | Bikhazi et al. | Apr 2015 | B1 |
9030321 | Breed | May 2015 | B2 |
9161172 | Poduri et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9253592 | Moscovich et al. | Feb 2016 | B1 |
9329701 | Lautner | May 2016 | B2 |
9389085 | Khorashadi et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9523760 | Kravets et al. | Dec 2016 | B1 |
9524628 | Omer et al. | Dec 2016 | B1 |
9551784 | Katuri et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9584974 | Omer et al. | Feb 2017 | B1 |
9609468 | Moscovich et al. | Mar 2017 | B1 |
9628365 | Gelvin et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9692459 | Maltsev et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9743294 | Omer et al. | Aug 2017 | B1 |
9866308 | Bultan et al. | Jan 2018 | B1 |
9869759 | Furuskog et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9927519 | Omer et al. | Mar 2018 | B1 |
9933517 | Olekas et al. | Apr 2018 | B1 |
9946351 | Sakaguchi et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9989622 | Griesdorf et al. | Jun 2018 | B1 |
10004076 | Griesdorf et al. | Jun 2018 | B1 |
10048350 | Piao et al. | Aug 2018 | B1 |
10051414 | Omer et al. | Aug 2018 | B1 |
10077204 | Maschmeyer et al. | Sep 2018 | B2 |
10108903 | Piao et al. | Oct 2018 | B1 |
10109167 | Olekas et al. | Oct 2018 | B1 |
10109168 | Devison et al. | Oct 2018 | B1 |
10111228 | Griesdorf et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10129853 | Manku et al. | Nov 2018 | B2 |
10228439 | Olekas et al. | Mar 2019 | B1 |
10264405 | Manku et al. | Apr 2019 | B1 |
10318890 | Kravets et al. | Jun 2019 | B1 |
10380856 | Devison et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10393866 | Kravets et al. | Aug 2019 | B1 |
10404387 | Devison et al. | Sep 2019 | B1 |
10438468 | Olekas et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10459074 | Omer et al. | Oct 2019 | B1 |
10459076 | Kravets et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10460581 | Devison et al. | Oct 2019 | B1 |
10498467 | Ravkine | Dec 2019 | B1 |
10499364 | Ravkine | Dec 2019 | B1 |
10506384 | Omer et al. | Dec 2019 | B1 |
10565860 | Omer et al. | Feb 2020 | B1 |
10567914 | Omer et al. | Feb 2020 | B1 |
10600314 | Manku et al. | Mar 2020 | B1 |
10605907 | Kravets et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
10605908 | Kravets et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
10743143 | Devison et al. | Aug 2020 | B1 |
10849006 | Beg et al. | Nov 2020 | B1 |
11070399 | Omer et al. | Jul 2021 | B1 |
20020080014 | McCarthy et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20030108119 | Mohebbi et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20050105659 | Sheu | May 2005 | A1 |
20050128067 | Zakrewski | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20060152404 | Fullerton et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060217132 | Drummond-Murray et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060284757 | Zemany | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070036353 | Reznik et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070147489 | Sun | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070280366 | Aytur | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070296571 | Kolen | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080057978 | Karaoguz et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080119130 | Sinha | May 2008 | A1 |
20080240008 | Backes et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080258907 | Kalpaxis | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080300055 | Lutnick et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080303655 | Johnson | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090062696 | Nathan et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090180444 | McManus et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20100073686 | Medeiros et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100127853 | Hanson et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100130229 | Sridhara et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100207804 | Hayward et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100220767 | Berens | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100234045 | Karr et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100306320 | Leppanen et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100315284 | Trizna et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110019587 | Wang | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110035491 | Gelvin et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110090081 | Khorashadi et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110148689 | Filippi et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110260856 | Rossmann et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110260871 | Karkowski | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110263946 | El Kaliouby et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120115512 | Grainger et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120146788 | Wilson et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120182429 | Forutanpour et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120184296 | Milosiu | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120283896 | Persaud | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130017836 | Chang et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130045759 | Smith | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130090151 | Ngai et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130094538 | Wang | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130113647 | Sentelle et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130162459 | Aharony et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130178231 | Morgan | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130283256 | Proud | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140015706 | Ishihara et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140073346 | Yang et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140126323 | Li et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140135042 | Buchheim et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140148195 | Bassan-Eskenazi et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140213284 | Yang et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140247179 | Furuskog | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140266669 | Fadell et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140274218 | Kadiwala et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140286380 | Prager et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140288876 | Donaldson | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140329540 | Duggan et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140355713 | Bao et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140358473 | Goel et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140361920 | Katuri et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150043377 | Cholas et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150049701 | Tian et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150063323 | Sadek et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150078295 | Mandyam et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150098377 | Amini et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150159100 | Shi et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150181388 | Smith | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150195100 | Imes et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150212205 | Shpater | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150245164 | Merrill | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150269825 | Tran | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150288745 | Moghaddam et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150304886 | Liu et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150309166 | Sentelle et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150312877 | Bhanage | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150338507 | Oh et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150350849 | Huang et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150366542 | Brown et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160014554 | Sen et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160018508 | Chen et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160080908 | Julian et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160088438 | O'Keeffe | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160088631 | Hedayat et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160135205 | Barbu et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160150418 | Kang et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160178741 | Ludlow et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160183059 | Nagy et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160187475 | Horng et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160203689 | Hintz et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160210838 | Yan et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160217683 | Li | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160262355 | Swan | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160363663 | Mindell et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160365913 | Lau | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170042488 | Muhsin | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170052247 | Kong et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170055126 | O'Keeffe | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170055131 | Kong et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170059190 | Stefanski et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170086281 | Avrahamy | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170090026 | Joshi et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170111852 | Selen et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170123528 | Hu et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170126488 | Cordeiro et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170146656 | Belsley et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170150255 | Wang et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170155439 | Chang et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170177618 | Hu et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170180882 | Lunner et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170195893 | Lee et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170223628 | Snyder et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170251392 | Nabetani | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170278374 | Skaaksrud | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170280351 | Skaaksrud | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170311279 | Allegue Martinez et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170311574 | Swan | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170343658 | Ramirez et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170359804 | Manku et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180027389 | Shirakata et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180086264 | Pedersen | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180106885 | Blayvas | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180120420 | McMahon et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180168552 | Shi et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180180706 | Li et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180184907 | Tran | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180270821 | Griesdorf et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180288587 | Allegue Martinez et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180330293 | Kulkarni et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20190033446 | Bultan et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190122514 | Olekas et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190146075 | Kravets et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190146076 | Kravets et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190146077 | Kravets et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190147713 | Devison et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190156943 | Kocherscheidt et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190170869 | Kravets et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190272718 | Hurtig et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190294833 | Lu et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190327124 | Lai et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190379434 | Lindskog et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20200145072 | Dash | May 2020 | A1 |
20200175405 | Omer et al. | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200178033 | Omer et al. | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200264292 | Kravets et al. | Aug 2020 | A1 |
20200351576 | Beg et al. | Nov 2020 | A1 |
20200351692 | Beg et al. | Nov 2020 | A1 |
20210063537 | Martinez et al. | Mar 2021 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2834522 | May 2014 | CA |
2945702 | Aug 2015 | CA |
108957399 | Dec 2018 | CN |
111373281 | Jul 2020 | CN |
1997-507298 | Jul 1997 | JP |
2004286567 | Oct 2004 | JP |
2013072865 | Apr 2013 | JP |
6776374 | Oct 2020 | JP |
2014021574 | Feb 2014 | WO |
2014201574 | Dec 2014 | WO |
2015168700 | Nov 2015 | WO |
2016005977 | Jan 2016 | WO |
2016066822 | May 2016 | WO |
2016110844 | Jul 2016 | WO |
2017106976 | Jun 2017 | WO |
2017132765 | Aug 2017 | WO |
2017177303 | Oct 2017 | WO |
2017210770 | Dec 2017 | WO |
2018071456 | Apr 2018 | WO |
2018094502 | May 2018 | WO |
2019041019 | Mar 2019 | WO |
2019075551 | Apr 2019 | WO |
2020150806 | Jul 2020 | WO |
2020150807 | Jul 2020 | WO |
2020227804 | Nov 2020 | WO |
2020227805 | Nov 2020 | WO |
2020227806 | Nov 2020 | WO |
Entry |
---|
USPTO, Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 19, 2021, in U.S. Appl. No. 17/106,989, 35 pgs. |
Banerjee , et al., “Through Wall People Localization Exploiting Radio Windows”, arXiv: 1307.7233v1, Jul. 27, 2013, 14 pgs. |
Cai , et al., “Human Movement Detection in Wi-Fi Mesh Networks”, Technical Disclosure Commons, Dec. 17, 2017, 8 pgs. |
Dekker , et al., “Gesture Recognition with a Low Power FMCW Radar and a Deep Convolutional Neural Network”, Proceedings of the 14th European Radar Conference, Nuremberg, Germany, Oct. 11-13, 2017, 4 pgs. |
Domenico , et al., “Exploring Training Options for RF Sensing Using CSI”, IEEE Communications Magazine, 2018, vol. 56, Issue 5, pp. 116-123, 8 pgs. |
Iqbal , et al., “Indoor Motion Classification Using Passive RF Sensing Incorporating Deep Learning”, ISSN: 2577-2465, Electronic IEEE, Jun. 3, 2018, 5 pgs. |
Kosba , et al., “Robust WLAN Device-free Passive Motion Detection”, IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, Apr. 2012, 6 pgs. |
Krumm , et al., “Locadio: Inferring Motion and Location from Wi-Fi Signal Strengths”, First Annual Int'l Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Systems: Networking and Services, Boston, MA, Aug. 22, 2004, 10 pgs. |
Lai , “This mesh WiFi router can track motion to protect your family”, https://www.engadget.com/2018-06-06-origin-wireless-wifi-mesh-motion-fall-sleep-detection.htm., Jun. 16, 2018, 6 pgs. |
Youssef, Moustafa , et al., “Challenges: Device-free Passive Localization for Wireless Environments”, Mobicom 07 Proceedings of the 13th Annual ACM International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, Sep. 2007, 11 pgs. |
Youssef , et al., “Challenges: Device-free Passive Localization for Wireless Environments”, Proceedings of the 13th Annual ACM Int'l Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, Montreal, Canada, Sep. 9, 2007, 8 pgs. |
WIPO, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 2, 2021, in PCT/CA2021/050560, 8 pgs. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220173939 A1 | Jun 2022 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 17106989 | Nov 2020 | US |
Child | 17379647 | US |