Patent Grant
8118026
The present invention pertains to a respirator that has a mask body that includes a living hinge on each side of its support structure. The living hinges enable the respirator mask body to better accommodate wearer jaw movement. The living hinges also may allow a single mask body to better accommodate various face sizes.
Respirators are commonly worn over the breathing passages of a person for one of two common purposes: (1) to prevent impurities or contaminants from entering the wearer's breathing track; and (2) to protect other persons or things from being exposed to pathogens and other contaminants exhaled by the wearer. In the first situation, the respirator is worn in an environment where the air contains particles that are harmful to the wearer, for example, in an auto body shop. In the second situation, the respirator is worn in an environment where there is risk of contamination to other persons or things, for example, in an operating room or clean room.
Some respirators are categorized as being “filtering face-pieces” because the mask body itself functions as the filtering mechanism. Unlike respirators that use rubber or elastomeric mask bodies in conjunction with attachable filter cartridges (see, e.g., U.S. Pat. RE39,493 to Yuschak et al.) or insert-molded filter elements (see, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 4,790,306 to Braun), filtering face-piece respirators have the filter media comprise much of the mask body itself so that there is no need for installing or replacing a filter cartridge. As such, filtering face-piece respirators are relatively light in weight and easy to use.
Filtering face-piece respirators generally fall into one of two categories, namely, fold-flat respirators and shaped respirators. Fold-flat respirators are stored flat but include seams, pleats, and/or folds that allow the mask to be opened into a cup-shaped configuration for use. Examples of flat-fold filtering face-piece respirators are shown in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,568,392 and 6,484,722 to Bostock et al. and U.S. Pat. No. 6,394,090 to Chen.
Shaped respirators, in contrast, are more-or-less permanently formed into a desired face-fitting configuration and generally retain that configuration during storage and use. Shaped filtering face-piece respirators regularly include a molded supporting shell structure, generally referred to as a “shaping layer”, which is commonly made from thermally bonding fibers or an open-work plastic mesh. The shaping layer is primarily designed to provide support for a filtration layer. Relative to the filtration layer, the shaping layer may reside on an inner portion of the mask (adjacent to the face of the wearer), or it may reside on an outer portion of the mask, or on both inner and outer portions. Examples of patents that disclose shaping layers to support filtration layers include U.S. Pat. No. 4,536,440 to Berg, U.S. Pat. No. 4,807,619 to Dyrud et al., and U.S. Pat. No. 4,850,347 to Skov.
In constructing a mask body for a shaped respirator, the filtration layer is typically juxtaposed against at least one shaping layer, and the assembled layers are subjected to a molding operation by, for example, placing the assembled layers between heated male and female mold parts (see, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 4,536,440 to Berg) or by passing the layers in superimposed relation through a heating stage and thereafter cold molding the superimposed layers into the shape of a face mask (see U.S. Pat. No. 5,307,796 to Kronzer et al. and U.S. Pat. No. 4,850,347 to Skov).
In known shaped filtering face-piece respirators, the filtration layer—whether assembled into the mask body by either of the above-noted techniques—typically becomes attached to the shaping layer by entanglement of the fibers at the interface between the layers or by binding of the fibers to the shaping layer. Alternatively, the filtration layer may be bonded to the shaping layer shell across its entire inner surface through use of an appropriate adhesive—see U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,923,182 and 6,041,782 to Angadjivand et al. Known filtering face-piece respirators also may be welded at the periphery of the mask body to join the assembled layers together.
As discussed above, persons skilled in the art of designing filtering face-piece respirators have developed a variety of methods for supporting a filtration layer in a shaped mask body. The mask bodies that have been designed, however, have generally been non-dynamic structures that do not accommodate the motion of the wearer's jaw. Respirator wearers often need to talk to their colleagues when working. The jaw movement that occurs when talking can cause the mask body to shift in location on the wearer's face. When the respirator shifts from its desired position on the wearer's face, opportunities may be created for contaminated air to enter the mask interior unfiltered. In addition, the opening of the jaw tends to pull the mask body downward, causing a clamping action on the nose. The non-dynamic structure of conventional respirators thus may create uncomfortable conditions for the wearer.
The present invention addresses a need for providing a filtering face-piece respirator that can accommodate wearer jaw movement so that the respirator remains suitably and comfortably fitted to the wearer's face during conversation. To this end, the present invention provides a filtering face-piece respirator that comprises: (a) a harness; (b) a mask body that comprises: (i) a filtration layer; and (ii) a support structure that includes first and second opposing side portions that each include a living hinge.
As indicated above, mask bodies for conventional filtering face-piece respirators have regularly used a support structure that comprised a nonwoven web of thermally bonded fibers or an open-work plastic mesh to support the filtration layer. These conventional support structures were lacking in an ability to dynamically respond to wearer jaw movement. The provision of living hinges in the support structure of a filtering face-piece respirator allows the support structure to better accommodate a person's jaw motion. The ability to accommodate wearer jaw movement in accordance with the present invention can enable the mask body to better remain in its desired position on the wearer's face during use. The provision of living hinges also can allow a single respirator to fit a greater range of face sizes and may alleviate the clamping action on the nose.
The terms set forth below will have the meanings as defined:
“bisect(s)” means to divide into two generally equal parts;
“center line” means a line that bisects the mask vertically when viewed from the front (
“centrally spaced” means separated significantly from one another along a line or plane that bisects the mask body vertically when viewed from the front;
“comprises (or comprising)” means its definition as is standard in patent terminology, being an open-ended term that is generally synonymous with “includes”, “having”, or “containing”. Although “comprises”, “includes”, “having”, and “containing” and variations thereof are commonly-used, open-ended terms, this invention also may be suitably described using narrower terms such as “consists essentially of”, which is semi open-ended term in that it excludes only those things or elements that would have a deleterious effect on the performance of the inventive respirator in serving its intended function;
“clean air” means a volume of atmospheric ambient air that has been filtered to remove contaminants;
“contaminants” means particles (including dusts, mists, and fumes) and/or other substances that generally may not be considered to be particles (e.g., organic vapors, et cetera) but which may be suspended in air, including air in an exhale flow stream;
“crosswise dimension” is the dimension that extends laterally across the respirator from side-to-side when the respirator is viewed from the front;
“exterior gas space” means the ambient atmospheric gas space into which exhaled gas enters after passing through and beyond the mask body and/or exhalation valve;
“filtering face-piece” means that the mask body itself is designed to filter air that passes through it; there are no separately identifiable filter cartridges or inserted-molded filter elements attached to or molded into the mask body to achieve this purpose;
“filter” or “filtration layer” means one or more layers of air-permeable material, which layer(s) is adapted for the primary purpose of removing contaminants (such as particles) from an air stream that passes through it;
“filtering structure” means a construction that is designed primarily for filtering air;
“first side” means an area of the mask body that is laterally distanced from a plane that bisects the respirator vertically and that would reside in the region of a wearer's cheek and/or jaw when the respirator is being donned;
“harness” means a structure or combination of parts that assists in supporting the mask body on a wearer's face;
“hinder movement” means impede, restrict, or deprive of movement when exposed to forces that exist under normal use conditions;
“integral” means the parts are made at the same time as a single part and not two separately manufactured parts that are subsequently joined together;
“interior gas space” means the space between a mask body and a person's face;
“line of demarcation” means a fold, seam, weld line, bond line, stitch line, hinge line, and/or any combination thereof;
“living hinge” means a mechanism that allows members that integrally extend therefrom to generally pivot thereabout in a rotational-type manner with such ease that damage is not caused to the members or to the hinge joint under normal use;
“longitudinally-movable” means capable of being moved in the longitudinal direction in response to mere finger pressure;
“mask body” means an air-permeable structure that is designed to fit over the nose and mouth of a person and that helps define an interior gas space separated from an exterior gas space;
“member”, in relation to the support structure, means an individually and readily identifiable solid part that is sized to contribute significantly to the overall construction and configuration of the support structure;
“perimeter” means the outer edge of the mask body, which outer edge would be disposed generally proximate to a wearer's face when the respirator is being donned by a person;
“pleat” means a portion that is designed to be folded back upon itself;
“pleated” means being folded back upon itself;
“polymeric” and “plastic” each mean a material that mainly includes one or more polymers and may contain other ingredients as well;
“plurality” means two or more;
“respirator” means an air filtration device that is worn by a person to provide the wearer with clean air to breathe;
“second side” means an area of the mask body that is distanced from a plane line that bisects the mask vertically (the second side being opposite the first side) and that would reside in the region of a wearer's cheek and/or jaw when the respirator is being donned;
“support structure” means a construction that is designed to have sufficient structural integrity to retain its desired shape, and to help retain the intended shape of the filtering structure that is supported by it, under normal handling;
“spaced” means physically separated or having measurable distance therebetween;
“transversely extending” means extending generally in the crosswise dimension;
a illustrates a side view of a mask body 12, in accordance with the present invention, where the longitudinally-movable, transversely-extending member 26 is located near member 28 in a non-expanded condition;
b illustrates the mask body 12 where the longitudinally-movable, transversely-extending member 26 is separated from member 28 to place the mask body in an open expanded configuration;
FIG. 5E1 is an enlarged view of the area within broken-line circle 5E1 of
FIGS. 5E2 to 5E5 illustrate alternative embodiments of living hinges that may be used in conjunction with the present invention;
a and 6b are side views of a another embodiment of a respirator 10″ having a different support structure 16″ and including a nose clip 72 and exhalation valve 74;
In practicing the present invention, a filtering face-piece respirator is provided that has living hinges on opposing sides of the mask body to enable mask body expansion and retraction in coordination with the motion of a person's jaw. Workers regularly need to communicate with one another on the job. Conventional filtering face-piece respirators, however, have not used a mask body that enabled significant dynamic movement in coordination with the motion of a wearer's jaw. Accordingly, conventional respirators exhibited an opportunity to shift in location on a wearer's face when the wearer was talking. The nose portion of the respirator also became pulled down against the wearer's nose when the jaw moved in a downward direction. The present invention addresses these drawbacks by providing one or more living hinges on each side of the mask body. The hinges enable the mask body, in one embodiment, to expand and contract longitudinally, as the case may be, when a wearer opens and closes their mouth when wearing the respiratory mask.
Exhalation valves that may be secured to the support structure 16 at frame 36 may have a construction similar to the unidirectional valves described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,188,622, 7,028,689, and 7,013,895 to Martin et al.; U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,117,868, 6,854,463, 6,843,248, and 5,325,892 to Japuntich et al.; U.S. Pat. No. 6,883,518 to Mittelstadt et al.; and RE37,974 to Bowers. The exhalation valve may be secured to the frame 36 by a variety of means, including sonic welds, adhesive bonding, mechanical clamping, and the like. The valve seat may be fashioned to include a cylinder that passes through the opening 38 and that is folded back upon itself in a clamping relationship with the frame 36—see, for example, U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,069,931, 7,007,695, 6,959,709, and 6,604,524 to Curran et al and EP1,030,721 to Williams et al. A valve cover also can be attached to the valve seat to create a chamber that surrounds the valve diaphragm. Examples of valve cover designs are shown in U.S. Pat. Des. 347,298 to Japuntich et al. and DES. 347,299 to Bryant et al.
a shows a side view of the mask body 12, where transversely-extending members 26 and 28 are positioned adjacent to one another such that the filtering structure 18 becomes pleated therebetween in pleatable region 42. The support structure 16 of mask body 12 includes a living hinge 44 located in the region where movable transversely extending member 26 meets member 28. The living hinge 44 allows transversely-extending members 26 and 28 to more easily move towards one another or to move apart from one another. As illustrated, the living hinge 44 may have a cul-de-sac shape. Unlike conventional hinges, living hinges tend to have the members that extend therefrom be integral to the point where rotation generally occurs. The living hinge thus may involve slight bending or stress and/or strain upon the moveable members and/or the hinge joint but is nonetheless capable of withstanding such stress and/or strain over the intended service life of the hinge. The living hinge 44 can be disposed between upper and lower harness attachment flanges 35a and 35b in the “y” dimension when the mask body 12 is viewed from the side and is oriented in an upright configuration as shown in
b shows the mask body 12 in a configuration where the pleatable region 42 is expanded. In this configuration, the transversely-extending members 26 and 28 are centrally spaced apart from one another at a near maximum distance. In comparing the mask body configuration of
The support structure may be made by known techniques such as injection molding. Known plastics such as olefins including, polyethylene, polypropylene, polybutylene, and polymethyl(pentene); plastomers; thermoplastics; thermoplastic elastomers; and blends or combinations thereof may be used to make the support structure. Additives such as pigments, UV stabilizers, anti-block agents, nucleating agents, fungicides, and bactericides also may be added to the composition that forms the support structure. The plastic used preferably is able to exhibit resilience, shape memory, and resistance to flexural fatigue so that the supporting structure can be deformed many times (i.e. greater than 100), particularly at any hinge points, and return to its original position. The plastic selected should be able to withstand an indefinite number of deformations so that the support structure exhibits a greater service life than the filter structure. The material selected for the support structure can be a plastic that exhibits a stiffness in flexure of about 75 to 300 Mega Pascals (MPa), more typically about 100 to 250 MPa, and still more typically about 175 to 225 MPa. A metal or ceramic material may be used in lieu of plastic to construct the support structure, although a plastic may be preferred for disposal/cost reasons. The support structure is a part or assembly that is not integral to (or made at the same time as) the filtering structure. The support structure members typically are sized to be larger than mere fibers or filaments used in the filtering structure. The members may be rectangular, circular, triangular, elliptical, trapezoidal, etc. when viewed in cross-section.
The filtering structure may take on a variety of different shapes and configurations. Preferably the filtering structure is adapted so that it properly fits against or within the support structure. Generally the shape and configuration of the filtering structure corresponds to the general shape of the support structure. The filtering structure may be disposed radially inward from the support structure, it may be disposed radially outward from the support structure, or it may be disposed between various members that comprise the support structure. Although the present filtering structure 18 has been illustrated with multiple layers that include a filtration layer 52 and cover webs 51a, 51b, the filtering structure may simply comprise a filtration layer or a combination of filtration layers. For example, a pre-filter may be disposed upstream to a more refined and selective downstream filtration layer. Additionally, sorptive materials such as activated carbon may be disposed between the fibers and/or various layers that comprise the filtering structure. Further, separate particulate filtration layers may be used in conjunction with sorptive layers to provide filtration for both particulates and vapors. Further details regarding filtration layer(s) that may be used in the filtering structure are provided below.
Various living hinge configurations are shown in FIGS. 5E2-5E5. As illustrated, the living hinge may have a general s-shaped configuration, a w-shaped configuration or other suitable configuration. The living hinge does not necessarily have to have one connection between each of the members that extend therefrom. FIGS. 5E2 and 5E3 illustrate a living hinge that has one connection to each of the members, whereas FIGS. 5E4 and 5E5 illustrate a plurality of connection points to one or both of the members that extend therefrom. As is apparent, there are a variety of ways in which a living hinge can be configured in accordance with the present invention. The invention therefore contemplates a variety of ways of achieving rotational-type movement about the hinge so that the mask body is capable of expanding or contracting to accommodate wearer jaw movement and the like.
a and 6b show another embodiment of a respiratory mask 10″. As this embodiment illustrates, the nose portion 66 of the support structure 16″ may be provided with a more open configuration to make the mask cooler to wear in that area of the wearer's face. As such, the support structure 16″ is not entirely solid in this area but has an opening 67 defined by transversely-extending members 68 and 70. The opening 67 makes the nose clip 72 visible to the user and readily accessible for adjustment. The nose clip 72 allows the filtering structure 18 to be adapted to the size and shape of the wearer's nose. The nose clip 72 may be made from a malleable strip of metal such as aluminum as described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,558,089 and Des. 412,573 to Castiglione. The nose clip also can take the form of a spring-loaded clip as described in U.S. Patent Publication 2007-0044803A1 to Xue et al. or may be a malleable plastic as described in U.S. Patent Publication 2007-0068529A1 to Kalatoor et al. The embodiment shown in
The support structure used in a mask body of the invention also may be constructed using differently configured members that extend from the living hinges or from a lesser number of transversely extending members and may exclude the use of a frame (36,
The filtering structure that is used in a mask body of the invention can be of a particle capture or gas and vapor type filter. The filtering structure also may be a barrier layer that prevents the transfer of liquid from one side of the filter layer to another to prevent, for instance, liquid aerosols or liquid splashes from penetrating the filter layer. Multiple layers of similar or dissimilar filter media may be used to construct the filtering structure of the invention as the application requires. Filters that may be beneficially employed in a layered mask body of the invention are generally low in pressure drop (for example, less than about 195 to 295 Pascals at a face velocity of 13.8 centimeters per second) to minimize the breathing work of the mask wearer. Filtration layers additionally are flexible and have sufficient shear strength so that they generally retain their structure under the expected use conditions. Examples of particle capture filters include one or more webs of fine inorganic fibers (such as fiberglass) or polymeric synthetic fibers. Synthetic fiber webs may include electret charged polymeric microfibers that are produced from processes such as meltblowing. Polyolefin microfibers formed from polypropylene that has been electrically charged provide particular utility for particulate capture applications. An alternate filter layer may comprise a sorbent component for removing hazardous or odorous gases from the breathing air. Sorbents may include powders or granules that are bound in a filter layer by adhesives, binders, or fibrous structures—see U.S. Pat. No. 3,971,373 to Braun. A sorbent layer can be formed by coating a substrate, such as fibrous or reticulated foam, to form a thin coherent layer. Sorbent materials may include activated carbons that are chemically treated or not, porous alumina-silica catalyst substrates, and alumina particles. An example of a sorptive filtration structure that may be conformed into various configurations is described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,391,429 to Senkus et al.
The filtration layer is typically chosen to achieve a desired filtering effect and, generally, removes a high percentage of particles and/or or other contaminants from the gaseous stream that passes through it. For fibrous filter layers, the fibers selected depend upon the kind of substance to be filtered and, typically, are chosen so that they do not become bonded together during the molding operation. As indicated, the filtration layer may come in a variety of shapes and forms and typically has a thickness of about 0.2 millimeters (mm) to 1 centimeter (cm), more typically about 0.3 mm to 0.5 cm, and it could be a generally planar web or it could be corrugated to provide an expanded surface area—see, for example, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,804,295 and 5,656,368 to Braun et al. The filtration layer also may include multiple filtration layers joined together by an adhesive or any other means. Essentially any suitable material that is known (or later developed) for forming a filtering layer may be used for the filtering material. Webs of melt-blown fibers, such as those taught in Wente, Van A., Superfine Thermoplastic Fibers, 48 Indus. Engn. Chem., 1342 et seq. (1956), especially when in a persistent electrically charged (electret) form are especially useful (see, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 4,215,682 to Kubik et al.). These melt-blown fibers may be microfibers that have an effective fiber diameter less than about 20 micrometers (μm) (referred to as BMF for “blown microfiber”), typically about 1 to 12 μm. Effective fiber diameter may be determined according to Davies, C. N., The Separation Of Airborne Dust Particles, Institution Of Mechanical Engineers, London, Proceedings 1B, 1952. Particularly preferred are BMF webs that contain fibers formed from polypropylene, poly(4-methyl-1-pentene), and combinations thereof. Electrically charged fibrillated-film fibers as taught in van Turnhout, U.S. Pat. Re. 31,285, may also be suitable, as well as rosin-wool fibrous webs and webs of glass fibers or solution-blown, or electrostatically sprayed fibers, especially in microfilm form. Electric charge can be imparted to the fibers by contacting the fibers with water as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,824,718 to Eitzman et al., U.S. Pat. No. 6,783,574 to Angadjivand et al., U.S. Pat. No. 6,743,464 to Insley et al., U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,454,986 and 6,406,657 to Eitzman et al., and U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,375,886 and 5,496,507 to Angadjivand et al. Electric charge also may be imparted to the fibers by corona charging as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,588,537 to Klasse et al. or by tribocharging as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,798,850 to Brown. Also, additives can be included in the fibers to enhance the filtration performance of webs produced through the hydro-charging process (see U.S. Pat. No. 5,908,598 to Rousseau et al.). Fluorine atoms, in particular, can be disposed at the surface of the fibers in the filter layer to improve filtration performance in an oily mist environment—see U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,398,847 B1, 6,397,458 B1, and 6,409,806 B1 to Jones et al. Typical basis weights for electret BMF filtration layers are about 10 to 100 grams per square meter. When electrically charged according to techniques described in, for example, the '507 patent, and when including fluorine atoms as mentioned in the Jones et al. patents, the basis weight may be about 20 to 40 g/m2 and about 10 to 30 g/m2, respectively.
An inner cover web can be used to provide a smooth surface for contacting the wearer's face, and an outer cover web can be used to entrap loose fibers in the mask body or for aesthetic reasons. The cover web typically does not provide any substantial filtering benefits to the filtering structure, although it can act as a pre-filter when disposed on the exterior (or upstream to) the filtration layer. To obtain a suitable degree of comfort, an inner cover web preferably has a comparatively low basis weight and is formed from comparatively fine fibers. More particularly, the cover web may be fashioned to have a basis weight of about 5 to 50 g/m2 (typically 10 to 30 g/m2), and the fibers are less than 3.5 denier (typically less than 2 denier, and more typically less than 1 denier but greater than 0.1). Fibers used in the cover web often have an average fiber diameter of about 5 to 24 micrometers, typically of about 7 to 18 micrometers, and more typically of about 8 to 12 micrometers. The cover web material may have a degree of elasticity (typically, but not necessarily, 100 to 200% at break) and may be plastically deformable.
Suitable materials for the cover web are blown microfiber (BMF) materials, particularly polyolefin BMF materials, for example polypropylene BMF materials (including polypropylene blends and also blends of polypropylene and polyethylene). A suitable process for producing BMF materials for a cover web is described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,013,816 to Sabee et al. The web may be formed by collecting the fibers on a smooth surface, typically a smooth-surfaced drum. Spun-bond fibers also may be used.
A typical cover web may be made from polypropylene or a polypropylene/polyolefin blend that contains 50 weight percent or more polypropylene. These materials have been found to offer high degrees of softness and comfort to the wearer and also, when the filter material is a polypropylene BMF material, to remain secured to the filter material without requiring an adhesive between the layers. Polyolefin materials that are suitable for use in a cover web may include, for example, a single polypropylene, blends of two polypropylenes, and blends of polypropylene and polyethylene, blends of polypropylene and poly(4-methyl-1-pentene), and/or blends of polypropylene and polybutylene. One example of a fiber for the cover web is a polypropylene BMF made from the polypropylene resin “Escorene 3505G” from Exxon Corporation, providing a basis weight of about 25 g/m2 and having a fiber denier in the range 0.2 to 3.1 (with an average, measured over 100 fibers of about 0.8). Another suitable fiber is a polypropylene/polyethylene BMF (produced from a mixture comprising 85 percent of the resin “Escorene 3505G” and 15 percent of the ethylene/alpha-olefin copolymer “Exact 4023” also from Exxon Corporation) providing a basis weight of about 25 g/m2 and having an average fiber denier of about 0.8. Suitable spunbond materials are available, under the trade designations “Corosoft Plus 20”, “Corosoft Classic 20” and “Corovin PP-S-14”, from Corovin GmbH of Peine, Germany, and a carded polypropylene/viscose material available, under the trade designation “370/15”, from J. W. Suominen OY of Nakila, Finland.
Cover webs that are used in the invention preferably have very few fibers protruding from the web surface after processing and therefore have a smooth outer surface. Examples of cover webs that may be used in the present invention are disclosed, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 6,041,782 to Angadjivand, U.S. Pat. No. 6,123,077 to Bostock et al., and WO 96/28216A to Bostock et al.
Test Methods
1. Stiffness in Flexure Test (SFT)
The stiffness in flexure of material used to make the support structure was measured according to ASTM D 5342-97 section 12.1 to 12.7. In so doing, six test specimens were cut from a blank film into rectangular pieces that were about 25.4 mm wide by about 70 mm long. The specimens were prepared as described below. Taber V-5 Stiffener tester Model 150-E (from Taber Corporation, 455 Bryant Street, North Tonawanda, N.Y., 14120) was used in 10-100 Taber stiffness unit configurations to measure the test specimens. The Taber Stiffness readings were recorded from the equipment display at the end of the test, and the stiffness in flexure was calculated using the following equation:
The stiffness in flexure from the six samples were averaged to give the Stiffness in Flexure.
2. Respirator Expansion Test (RET)
The respirator's Maximum Load at a 30% Tensile Expansion and its Hysteresis were measured under this test. These parameters are indicative of the dynamic performance of the respirator support structure. The Maximum Load at a 30% Tensile Expansion measures the flexibility (or resistance to expansion) of the support structure in the longitudinal dimension under dynamic expansion. Lower Maximum Load values are indicative of greater ease of respirator expansion. The Hysteresis measures the support structure's inability to return to its original shape or condition when the force that causes the change in shape or condition has been removed. Thus, for purposes of the invention, a lower Hysteresis is desired. The Maximum Load at a 30% Tensile Expansional Hysteresis were measured using an Instron, 4302 Universal material testing instrument (from Instron Corporation, 100 Royall Street, Canton, Mass., 02021). During the test, data was collected every 1 second using an Instron Merlin Data acquisition software, also available from the Instron Corporation. The “gauge length” was set in the Instron test equipment such that it was equal to the longitudinal length of the mask body in its relaxed or unstressed condition (D,
Before testing, a 0.76 mm thick High Density Polyethylene (HDPE) film strip 76 that was 51 mm long and 25.4 mm wide (from Loose Plastic Inc, 3132 West Dale Road, Beaverton, Mich., 48612), was stapled centrally to the top and bottom of the mask body 12 as shown in
3. Transversely-Extending Member Movement Test (TEMMT)
Maximum force required to move the transversely-extending members was measured by imposing tensile strain on the transversally-extending members. The test was done using an Instron 4302 Universal material testing instrument described in the Modulus Test Method above. Gauge length between the two pneumatic grips of Instron test equipment was set at 114 mm. The two transversely-extending members were first set at their relaxed spaced-apart distance, which in this case was 5 mm. The two transversely-extending members were then pulled apart to impose tensile strain thereon. The tensile strain was exerted on the members until they were spaced up to about 3.5 cm beyond the baseline starting point or “rest state”. The distance extended was measured along the center line. The tensile strain was imposed at a cross head speed of 254 mm per minute. The initial rest state 5 mm gap was set as a zero reference point for this test. The rest state is the position that the transversely-extending reside in when no forces are placed thereon. Each specimen was then tested three times by opening and closing the gap between the two members. Then force versus distance data for each cycle was collected.
Sample Preparation
1. Stiffness in Flexure Test Specimen
Test specimens for the Stiffness in Flexure Test were prepared from the same compounded polymer ingredients that were blended together to make the respirator support structure. See Table 2 for the polymeric composition of the support structure. Forty (40) grams of the compound were used to make a circular film that was 114 mm in radius and 0.51 to 0.64 mm thick. The first 40 grams of the compounded material was poured into a twin screw roller blade Type Six BRABENDER mixer (from C.W. Brabender instruments Inc., 50 East Wesley Street, P.O. Box 2127, South Hackensack, N.J., 07606). The mixer was operating at 75 revolutions per minute (RPM) and at a temperature of 185° C. After blending the molten compound for about 10 minutes, the mixture was pressed under 44.5 kilonewtons (KN) of force to make the 0.51 to 0.64 mm thick flat circular film that was 114 mm in diameter. The compression was conducted using a hot platen set at 149° C. The hot platen was a Genesis 30 ton Compression molding press from WABASH Equipments 1569 Morris Street, P.O. Box 298, Wabash, Ind. 46992. Before testing for stiffness in flexure, the films were cut to the required test specimen sizes of 25.4 mm wide by 70 mm long.
2. Respirator Support Structure Manufacture
Samples of the respirator support structure were made using a standard injection molding process. Single cavity male and female molds, matching the geometry of the frame shown in
A 110 Ton Toshiba VIS-6 molding press was used during the injection molding process to make the support structure under the conditions and set points shown in Table 1:
A compounding of polymers listed in Table 2 below at the specified weight percentages were mixed to obtain the desired physical properties of the support structure.
3. Respirator Filtering Structure Manufacture
Respirator filtering structures were formed from two layers of nonwoven fibrous electret filter material that was 254 mm wide, laminated between one 50 grams per square meter (gsm) outer layer of white nonwoven fibrous spunbond material and one 22 gsm inner layer of white nonwoven fibrous spunbond material having the same width. Both layers of the nonwoven fibrous spunbond materials were made of polypropylene. The electret filter material was the standard filter material that is used in a 3M 8511 N95 respirator. The laminated web blank was cut into the 254 mm long pieces to form a square before being formed into a cup formation that had a three-dimension (3D) pleat extending transversely across the filtering structure.
As shown in
4. Other Respirator Components
Face seal: Standard 3M 4000 Series respirator face seal.
Nose clip: Standard 3M 8210 Plus N 95 Respirator nose clip.
Headband: Standard 3M 8210 Plus N 95 Respirator headband material but white in color. The Yellow pigment for 3M 8210 Plus respirator headband was removed.
Buckle: A buckle similar to a back-pack buckle with flexible hinge to allow comfortable adjustment of headband material.
5. Respirator Assembly
The face seal material was cut to pieces that were about 140 mm by 180 mm. A die cut tool was then used to create an oval opening that was 125 mm by 70 mm and was located in the center of the face seal. The face seal with the central cut out opening was attached to respirator filtering structure made as described above. The same equipment that was used to ultrasonically weld the filtering element structure was used to secure the face seal to the filtering structure under similar process conditions. The welding anvil had an oval shape of about 168 mm wide and 114 mm long. After the face seal was joined to the filtering structure, excess material outside of the weld line was removed. The nose clip was adhered to the outside of the assembled filtering structure crosswise over the nose area. Then the pre-assembled filtering element was inserted into the support structure in its desired orientation. The complex 3D pleat was strategically located between transversely extending members 26 and 28 shown in
For comparison purposes, five samples of commercially available Moldex 2200 N 95 respirators from Moldex Metric Inc., 10111 W. Jefferson Boulevard, Culver City, Calif. 90232 were also tested according to the Respirator Expansion Text described above. The Moldex 2200 series respirator has a Dura-Mesh™ shell that is designed to resist collapse in heat and humidity. A Moldex face mask that uses an open-work flexible plastic layer as a shell is described in Moldex's U.S. Pat. No. 4,850,347 (Skov).
Test Results
1. Stiffness in Flexure
The compounded ingredients listed in Table 2 were selected to match desired structural and flexibility properties needed for the support structure. The calculated stiffness in flexure for the support structure material is listed in Table 3 below:
The data set forth in Table 3 show that the Stiffness in Flexure of the support structure materials is about 200 MPa.
2. Physical Performance of Finished Products
The maximum force required to cause a 30% longitudinal expansion of the mask body and the hysteresis of the support structure were measured on finished respiratory masks using the Respirator Expansion Test described above.
i. Maximum Load for Each Cycle
The Maximum Load required to expand the respirator 30% was measured by recording the maximum force used for each cycle.
The data shown in Table 4 demonstrate that extraordinarily less force is needed to achieve a 30% tensile expansion of the inventive mask body when compared to a Moldex 2200 respirator.
ii. Hysteresis After 30% Vertical Expansion
The data in Table 5 show that the inventive respirators exhibit substantially less Hysteresis when compared to commercially available Moldex 2200 respirators. That is, the respirators that have support structures that use a living hinge on each side of the mask exhibit substantially less inability to return to their original condition when the expansion force has ceased.
iii. Percent Tensile Strain v. Load
The “% Tensile Strain vs. Load” data was plotted on a graph. The plotted data is shown in
iv. Transversely-Extending Member Movement Measurements
Five respirator support structures were made as described in sample preparation section above. To eliminate the interference from the rest of the support structure, the 24.5 mm wide and 76 mm long HDPE films described above were attached to the transversely extending members (26 and 28,
The force required to longitudinally move the transversely-extending members 26 and 28 of the support structure were measured from the rest state using test method described above. The forces set forth below in Table 6 represent forces required to extend the transversely-extending members in the longitudinal direction.
The data set forth in Table 6 show that very little force is needed to separate transversely-extending members that are joined together by a living hinge. A graph of this data is set forth in
This invention may take on various modifications and alterations without departing from its spirit and scope. Accordingly, this invention is not limited to the above-described but is to be controlled by the limitations set forth in the following claims and any equivalents thereof.
This invention also may be suitably practiced in the absence of any element not specifically disclosed herein.
All patents and patent applications cited above, including those in the Background section, are incorporated by reference into this document in total. To the extent that there is a conflict or discrepancy between the disclosure in the incorporated document and the above specification, the above specification will control.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/974,017, filed Sep. 20, 2007.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1502450 | Wood | Jul 1924 | A |
| 2284949 | Cover | Jun 1942 | A |
| 2382364 | Yant | Aug 1945 | A |
| 3792702 | Delest | Feb 1974 | A |
| 4112521 | Uke | Sep 1978 | A |
| 4171555 | Bakker et al. | Oct 1979 | A |
| 4248220 | White | Feb 1981 | A |
| D267985 | Huber | Feb 1983 | S |
| 4395803 | Krauss | Aug 1983 | A |
| 4454881 | Huber et al. | Jun 1984 | A |
| 4525901 | Krauss | Jul 1985 | A |
| 4571783 | Kasai | Feb 1986 | A |
| D285374 | Huber et al. | Aug 1986 | S |
| 4641645 | Tayebi | Feb 1987 | A |
| 4657010 | Wright | Apr 1987 | A |
| 4739755 | White et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
| 5050594 | Babb | Sep 1991 | A |
| 5094236 | Tayebi | Mar 1992 | A |
| D344608 | Goryachy et al. | Feb 1994 | S |
| 5673690 | Tayebi et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 6041782 | Angadjivand et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6148817 | Bryant et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6394090 | Chen et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6474336 | Wolfe | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6892730 | Griffiths | May 2005 | B2 |
| 7086400 | Shigematsu et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7121279 | Dennis | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 20030205231 | Shigematsu et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20050211251 | Henderson et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20060130841 | Spence et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060219246 | Dennis | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2005986 | Dec 2008 | EP |
| 2059782 | Apr 1981 | GB |
| 2408213 | May 2005 | GB |
| 2546834 | Sep 1997 | JP |
| 2000-140139 | May 2000 | JP |
| 2000-279537 | Oct 2000 | JP |
| 2003-093528 | Apr 2003 | JP |
| 2003-320043 | Nov 2003 | JP |
| 2004-313635 | Nov 2004 | JP |
| 2005-102818 | Apr 2005 | JP |
| 3117120 | Jan 2006 | JP |
| 2006-247046 | Jan 2007 | JP |
| 2007-000378 | Jan 2007 | JP |
| 20-1997-0000011 | Jan 1997 | KR |
| 10-2006-0083536 | Jul 2006 | KR |
| 9906116 | Feb 1999 | WO |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20090078262 A1 | Mar 2009 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60974017 | Sep 2007 | US |
