The present technology relates generally to hearing prostheses, and more particularly, to filtering feedback from a hard-coupled vibrating transducer.
Hearing loss, which may be due to many different causes, is generally of two types, conductive and sensorineural. Sensorineural hearing loss occurs when there is damage to the inner ear, or to the nerve pathways from the inner ear to the brain. Individuals suffering from conductive hearing loss typically have some form of residual hearing because the hair cells in the cochlea are undamaged. As a result, individuals suffering from conductive hearing loss typically receive a prosthetic hearing device that generates mechanical motion of the cochlea fluid. For example, acoustic energy may be delivered through a column of air to the tympanic membrane (eardrum) via a hearing aid residing in the ear canal. Mechanical energy may be delivered via the physical coupling of a mechanical transducer (i.e. a transducer that converts electrical signals to mechanical motion) to the tympanic membrane, the skull, the ossicular chain, the round or oval window of the cochlea or other structure that will result in the delivery of mechanical energy to the hydro-mechanical system of the cochlea.
Individuals suffering from conductive hearing loss typically receive an acoustic hearing aid, referred to as a hearing aid herein. Unfortunately, not all individuals who suffer from conductive hearing loss are able to derive suitable benefit from hearing aids. For example, some individuals are prone to chronic inflammation or infection of the ear canal thereby eliminating hearing aids as a potential solution. Other individuals have malformed or absent outer ear and/or ear canals resulting from a birth defect, or as a result of medical conditions such as Treacher Collins syndrome or Microtia. Furthermore, hearing aids are typically unsuitable for individuals who suffer from single-sided deafness (total hearing loss only in one ear). Hearing aids commonly referred to as “cross aids” have been developed for single sided deaf individuals. These devices receive the sound from the deaf side with one hearing aid and present this signal (either via a direct electrical connection or wirelessly) to a hearing aid which is worn on the opposite side. Unfortunately, this requires the recipient to wear two hearing aids. Additionally, in order to prevent acoustic feedback problems, hearing aids generally require that the ear canal be plugged, resulting in unnecessary pressure, discomfort, or other problems such as eczema.
As noted, hearing aids rely primarily on the principles of air conduction. However, other types of devices commonly referred to as bone conducting hearing aids or bone conduction devices, function by converting a received sound into a mechanical force. This force is transferred through the bones of the skull to the cochlea and causes motion of the cochlea fluid. Hair cells inside the cochlea are responsive to this motion of the cochlea fluid and generate nerve impulses which result in the perception of the received sound. Bone conduction devices have been found suitable to treat a variety of types of hearing loss and may be suitable for individuals who cannot derive sufficient benefit from acoustic hearing aids, cochlear implants, etc., or for individuals who suffer from stuttering problems.
In one aspect, there is provided a stimulating hearing prosthesis, comprising: at least one sound input device configured to sense a sound signal; and a transducer configured to generate a vibration based on the sound signal; wherein the sound input device is substantially rigidly coupled or hard coupled to the transducer.
In another aspect, there is provided a hearing prosthesis, comprising: at least one sound input device configured to sense a sound signal; a transducer configured to generate a vibration based on the sound signal; and a signal processor connected to the sound input device and configured to filter well-defined mechanical feedback from the vibration received by the sound input device.
In another aspect, there is provided a method comprising: receiving an acoustic signal with acoustic feedback and mechanical feedback; applying a first modification of the signal to reduce well-defined mechanical feedback from signal; generating a stimulation information based on the modified signal; and generating a mechanical force based on the stimulation information.
According to an exemplary embodiment, there is a hearing prosthesis as detailed herein, wherein an adaptation of the first part of the two part feedback management system by the second part is configured to update less than about once every 160 milliseconds or less than about one every 180 milliseconds.
According to an exemplary embodiment, there is a hearing prosthesis as detailed herein, further comprising a two part feedback management system, wherein a first part of the two part feedback management system is optimized to reduce low frequency feedback.
Embodiments of the present technology are described below with reference to the attached drawings, in which:
Aspects and embodiments of the present technology are directed to a mechanical stimulating hearing prosthesis in which the sound input component and vibrating transducer are rigidly or hard coupled, directly or indirectly. The phrases “rigidly coupled” and “hard coupled,” which are used to denote the same feature, mean that the sound input device is intentionally connected to the transducer using a mechanical connection that is stiff, firm, or otherwise substantially inflexible. The mechanical connection can be any mechanical connection such as a direct connection where the sound input device and transducer are coupled without an intervening element, or an indirect connection using a metal shaft, bolt, threaded connection or adhesive connection, or any other coupling mechanism that will produce a mechanical connection. Examples of these connections are detailed further in this specification. Other mechanical connections, not herein disclosed, are also contemplated providing they provide a rigid connection between sound input device and the transducer.
Due to such hard-coupling, the vibration feedback to the sound input device can be accurately defined. The prosthesis also includes a filter configured to substantially remove or compensate for this well-defined vibration feedback. Hearing prostheses that generate mechanical stimulation include, for example, a bone conduction device and a middle ear implant. Aspects of the present technology are described next below with reference to one type of mechanical stimulating hearing prosthesis, namely a bone conduction device. It should be appreciated, however, that embodiments of the present technology may be implemented in other mechanical stimulating hearing prostheses now or later developed.
The hearing prosthesis generally comprises a sound input device to receive sound waves and a vibrating transducer (e.g. actuator) hard-coupled to the sound input device and configured to vibrate in response to sound signals received by the sound input device. A housing is configured to house one or more operational components, such as a vibrating transducer and a sound input device, of the hearing prosthesis. The outer shell of the vibrator itself may also act as the housing such that the vibrator and housing are one and the same structure. Since the vibrating transducer is hard-coupled to the sound input device, feedback from the vibrating transducer received by the sound input device is more well-defined or accurate, and therefore easier to cancel out using filters or other techniques, than if the vibrating transducer was not hard-coupled to the sound input device.
As noted, hearing prosthesis such as bone conduction devices have been found suitable to treat various types of hearing loss and may be suitable for individuals who cannot derive suitable benefit from acoustic hearing aids, cochlear implants, etc.
In a fully functional human hearing, outer ear 101 comprises an auricle 109 and an ear canal 106. A sound wave 107 is collected by auricle 109 and channeled into and through ear canal 106. Disposed across the distal end of ear canal 106 is a tympanic membrane 104 which vibrates in response to sound wave 107. This vibration is coupled to oval window or fenestra ovalis 110 through three bones of middle ear 102, collectively referred to as the ossicles 111 and comprising the malleus 112, the incus 113 and the stapes 114. Bones 112, 113 and 114 of middle ear 102 serve to filter and amplify sound wave 107, causing oval window 110 to articulate, or vibrate. Such vibration sets up waves of fluid motion within cochlea 115. Such fluid motion, in turn, activates tiny hair cells (not shown) that line the inside of cochlea 115. Activation of the hair cells causes appropriate nerve impulses to be transferred through the spiral ganglion cells and auditory nerve 116 to the brain (not shown), where they are perceived as sound.
Also as described below, bone conduction device 100A may comprise a sound processor, a vibrating transducer and/or various other operational components which facilitate operation of the device. More particularly, bone conduction device 100A operates by converting the sound received by sound input device 126 into electrical signals. These electrical signals are utilized by the sound processor to generate control signals that cause the transducer (located in housing 124) to vibrate. These control signals are provided to the vibrating transducer. As described below, the vibrating transducer converts the signals into mechanical vibrations used to output a force for delivery to the recipient's skull.
In accordance with embodiments of the present technology, bone conduction device 100A further includes a housing 124, a coupling 140 and an implanted anchor 162 configured to attach the device to the recipient. In the specific embodiments of
As shown in
In one arrangement of
As noted, sound input device 126 and vibrating transducer 206 are rigidly connected or hard coupled to each other. Exemplary embodiments of how such a rigid connection may be implemented are illustrated in
As shown in
Due to the rigid coupling between transducer 206 and sound input device 126, vibrations generated by transducer 206 travel through the rigid coupling to transducer 206 and input device 126. More specifically, vibrations produced by vibrating transducer 206 may be picked up by sound input device 126 as mechanical (or acoustical) feedback. Acoustic feedback heard by sound input element 126 may come from background noise, noise from the transducer movement, noise from the housing, or noise from the rigid connection between the transducer and either the sound input element or the housing due to the movement of the transducer. If vibrating transducer 206 and sound input device 126 were not rigidly coupled, and rather isolated from each other, input sound device 126 may still pick up mechanical vibrations (and/or acoustic signals) as feedback from transducer 206. However, such mechanical feedback may be unpredictable and/or varying because of the physical and electrical space separation between transducer 206 and sound input device 126. Rigid coupling between transducer 206 and sound input device 126, however, causes the mechanical feedback received by sound input device 126 from transducer 206 to be well-defined. While the mechanical feedback received by sound input device 126 from transducer 206 may be stronger or of a higher magnitude, the feedback is more predictable and substantially constant. In one form the feedback is easily determinable or calculable based on one or more factors such as voltage applied to the transducer or other known measurable factors.
Mechanical feedback, as described, is well-defined or well known when it is set or measured during development of the hearing prosthesis or during the fitting process of the hearing process to the recipient. In other words, the mechanical feedback path is determinable and the feedback will not vary far from that determined feedback because the mechanics of the system, due to the rigid connection, will not vary over time. More specifically, the mechanics of the system, including the rigid coupling, should not change over time even if the transducer and/or other components of the system are shaken, dropped, or normal use events. As such, the set/measured feedback data taken during manufacture or fitting will remain consistent. This concept may be most reliable for lower frequencies, e.g. frequencies below 1 kHz, which are the most common frequencies for the mechanical feedback discussed herein, but may also apply to higher frequencies. On the other hand, prior art systems describe the opposite principle. More specifically, prior art describes systems that isolate the sound input device and insulate the sound input device from the actuator to try to reduce the feedback reaching the sound input device as low as possible.
A well-defined feedback path, such as the feedback from a transducer rigidly coupled to a sound input device, is more easily canceled by a filter or set of filters or other noise cancelling technique because the mechanical feedback is not random and can be accurately defined/predicted, as described. For example, such feedback may be canceled by the use of a static or slow moving filter, such as, for example, an all pass filter. However, it is understood that various other techniques for canceling such feedback may be used, such as other types of filters and anti-feedback algorithms.
Vibrating transducer 206 is also coupled to shaft or post 210. Shaft 210 may be connected to an anchor or abutment to be implanted in the skull of a recipient as part of a percutaneous bone conduction device, as shown in
Embodiments of the present technology may also be implemented in a middle ear implant, or direct mechanical stimulation system. Such an embodiment may be implemented with similar features as explained in
Initially, analog-to-digital conversion operations are performed on analog audio signal 312 at block 302. The A/D conversion encodes analog audio signal 312 at a specified sample rate, then further scales the encoded signal, prior to generating a digital audio signal 314 representative of the received sound 107.
Pre-processing block 304 receives digital audio signal 314 and generates one or more pre-processed digital signals to provide to vibration feedback manager 306. Examples of operations that can be performed by pre-processing block 304 include various types of signal conditioning, multi-channel compression, dynamic range expansion, noise reduction and/or amplitude scaling.
Pre-processed digital audio signal 316 may contain noise from any one of a variety of sources. For example, the feedback of transducer vibrations through sound input device 126 will result in signal 316 having noise which could interfere with the fidelity of the hearing percept invoked by the hearing prosthesis. As shown in
Filter bank 308 separates pre-processed digital signals 317 into a plurality of frequency bands for processing by sound processing block 310.
Filtered digital signals 318 are provided from filter bank 308 to sound processing block 310. Sound processing 310 may include applying digital signal processing algorithms to generate transducer control signals 320. Therefore, control signals 320 will be a signal capable of being understood by transducer 206 to drive the transducer to generate a mechanical force representative of the received sound. The output signal of sound processing block 310 will represent generated stimulation information based on the processed signals.
Static filter 372 may be, for example, a wholly static or slow moving all-pass filter, such as an all pass filter with a static phase shift. However, a variety of other filters may be used, including but not limited to an IIR filter, an all-pass phase equalizer filter or an FIR filter. Filter 372 is used to cancel out at least the mechanical feedback received by sound input device 126 (and other sound input devices, such as sound input device 309, if present) picked up from vibrations by transducer 306. Such mechanical feedback is generally at relatively lower frequencies, for example frequencies less than 1 kHz, but may also have higher frequency components. Furthermore, the feedback received by vibration feedback manager 306 generally comprises mechanical feedback, but may also comprise acoustical feedback received from transducer 206 or from other sources.
As noted, vibration feedback manager 306 also includes an adaptive feedback reduction algorithm 374. Filtered signal(s) from filter 372 are passed to filter(s) 374, which applies an adaptive feedback reduction algorithm to remove changes in the feedback path as well as any acoustical feedback (generally at higher frequencies) that filter 372 did not cancel out. Filter 374, for example, may be implemented into the system using software, a digital circuit, an analog circuit, or other implementations not described herein. For example, vibration feedback manager 306 may include a microprocessor or other signal processor device that executes filter 374. After adaptive feedback reduction algorithm 374 is applied to the signal(s), signal 317 is sent out of the vibration feedback manager 306 and to the next step in processing pipeline 300.
As noted, filter 372 may be static. Alternatively, filter 372 may be slow-moving and therefore not completely static. Because the mechanical feedback received by a microphone from the transducer is relatively consistent, and therefore, predictable, filter 372 may be selected in production based on measurements of the feedback.
However, even well-defined feedback may adjust or vary slightly over time due to, for example, aging of the device, changes in vibrating transducer load, or physical environment, such as the recipient covering the bone conduction device. Therefore, in the illustrative embodiment, adaptive feedback reduction algorithm 374 may dynamically adjust the filter system based on changes in the feedback over time. Adaptive feedback reduction algorithm 374 may compare the signal(s) received by the sound input devices with the feedback signals that are being transmitted by the vibrating transducer to determine any changes in the feedback. Vibration feedback manager 306 and, more specifically, filter 374 may use this feedback information to adjust itself over time. However, because mechanical feedback received by a microphone from a hard-coupled transducer may be so well-defined, system adaptation may be set to occur at a rate as low as 160 milliseconds, or even slower. For example, the speed of system adaptation may be set to directly correlate to frequency of the feedback, i.e. the lower the frequency, the lower the adaptation time of the system.
Vibration feedback manager 306 may dynamically adjust the filtering system dynamically, as described above, or feedback changes may also be noted and accounted for by an audiologist fitting a recipient.
As noted, filter 372 generally cancels feedback at lower frequencies. However, filter 372 may cancel some feedback at higher frequencies. Furthermore, as noted, adaptive feedback reduction algorithm 374 generally cancels feedback at higher frequencies. However, adaptive feedback reduction algorithm 374 may also cancel other feedback that was not canceled at filter 372, such as, for example, some lower frequency feedback.
As noted in block 403, the processed and filtered signals are then passed to the transducer as control/driver signals. As noted in block 404, the signals passed to the transducer are used to generate a mechanical force to illicit a hearing perception by the recipient. As noted, the mechanical force generated by transducer 206 will be transmitted to the skull bone of the recipient by one or more of several methods of bone conduction. For example, as shown in
As noted in block 413, the digital signals received from pre-processing are then modified to, for example, cancel the well-defined mechanical feedback received as a result of the transducer's vibrations. As noted, this well-defined feedback may be canceled using a static or slow-moving all-pass filter or other canceling devices. However, other noise signals or feedback may be canceled due to this static or slow-moving filter other than the feedback received from the vibrating transducer. If feedback is left over (likely mostly acoustic feedback) after such a filter is applied, that feedback will be canceled by an adaptive feedback reduction algorithm, as noted in block 414.
After the digital signals are filtered, the system generates stimulation information based on the processed and filtered signals to generate a mechanical force based on that stimulation information, as noted in blocks 415 and 416, respectively. When stimulation information based on a processed audio signal is sent to the transducer, the transducer generates a mechanical force based on that information and the mechanical force is delivered to the recipient to illicit a hearing perception, as noted in block 417. As noted above and as shown in
The technology described and claimed herein is not to be limited in scope by the specific preferred embodiments herein disclosed, since these embodiments are intended as illustrations, and not limitations, of several aspects of the technology. Any equivalent embodiments are intended to be within the scope of this technology. Indeed, various modifications of the technology in addition to those shown and described herein will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the foregoing description. Such modifications are also intended to fall within the scope of the appended claims.
This patent application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/788,558, by the same title as that in caption above, filed in the USPTO on Mar. 15, 2013, naming Martin Hillbratt as an inventor, the entire contents of that application being incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6387039 | Moses | May 2002 | B1 |
7720245 | Bauman et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7965853 | Gao et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
20020027996 | Leedom | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020122563 | Schumaier | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20040120535 | Woods | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20050226447 | Miller, III | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20080212816 | Pedersen | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090074220 | Shennib | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090138062 | Balslev | May 2009 | A1 |
20090252361 | van Halteren | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100166198 | Perman | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100329493 | Arndt et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110188686 | Munk | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20120029267 | Ball | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120195450 | Foeh | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120302823 | Andersson | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130188796 | Kristensen | Jul 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2007-051395 | Mar 2007 | JP |
2010111519 | Sep 2010 | WO |
WO 201214081 | Oct 2012 | WO |
WO-2012140818 | Oct 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report for PCT/IB2014/059843 dated Jul. 30, 2014. |
Ann Spriet, Adaptive Filtering Techniques for Noise Reduction and Acoustic Feedback Cancellation in Hearing Aids, Ph.D. Thesis, 2004. |
Supplementary European Search Report for EP 14764706, dated Oct. 7, 2016. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140288357 A1 | Sep 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61788558 | Mar 2013 | US |