The present invention relates to a filtration media pack and a filter element that can be used to filter a fluid. The invention is additionally directed to methods for manufacturing and using a filtration media pack.
Fluid streams, such as air and liquid, carry contaminant material therein. In many instances, it is desired to filter some or all of the contaminant materials from the fluid stream. For example, air flow streams to engines for motorized vehicles or for power generation equipment, gas streams to gas turbine systems, and air streams to various combustion furnaces, carry particulate contaminants therein that should be filtered. Also liquid streams in engine lube systems, hydraulic systems, coolant systems or fuel systems, can carry contaminants that should be filtered. It is preferred for such systems, that selected contaminant material be removed from (or have its level reduced in) the fluid. A variety of fluid filter (air or liquid filter) arrangements have been developed for contaminant reduction. In general, however, continued improvements are sought.
Z-media generally refers to a type of fluted filtering media element where a fluid enters flutes on a first face of the media element and exits from flutes at a second face of the media element. In general, the faces on z-media are provided on opposite ends of the media. The fluid enters through open flutes on one face and exits through open flutes on the other face. At some point between the first face and the second face, the fluid passes from one flute to another flute to provide for filtration.
Early forms of z-media were often referred to as corrugated media because the characterization of the media was adopted from the corrugated box board industry. Corrugated box boards, however, were generally designed for carrying a load. Accordingly, flute designs can be modified away from the standards and sizes from the corrugated box board industry to provide improved filtration media performance.
Various disclosures have been provided for modifying the form of the flutes in z-media. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,562,825 describes corrugation patterns which utilize somewhat semicircular (in cross section) inlet flutes adjacent narrow V-shaped (with curved sides) exit flutes are shown (see
A filtration media pack is provided according to the present invention. The filtration media pack includes a plurality of layers of single facer media. A layer of single facer media comprises a fluted sheet, a facing sheet, and a plurality of flutes extending between the fluted sheet and the facing sheet and having a flute length extending from a first face of the filtration media pack to a second face of the filtration media pack. The filtration media pack includes a first portion of flutes that are closed to unfiltered fluid flowing into the first portion of the flutes and a second portion of flutes that am closed to unfiltered fluid flowing out of the second portion of the flutes so that fluid passing into one of the first face or the second face of the media pack and out the other of the first face or the second face of the media pack passes through media to provide filtration of the fluid. The filtration media pack can be characterized as a z-media pack, if desired, and can be provided having inlet flutes and outlet flutes so that unfiltered fluid flows into the media pack via the inlet flutes and out of the media pack via the outlet flutes. It should be understood, however, that the flutes of the media pack need not be characterized as inlet flutes and outlet flutes.
The performance of the filtration media pack can be altered or modified by selecting from several design criteria. The term “performance” generally refers to at least one of increased longevity, increased loading capacity, decreased pressure drop, increased flow, decreased size or volume, etc. For example, the filtration media pack can be designed for a particular application to provide enhanced performance compared with certain presently available z-media packs. Enhancing performance can result from, for example, controlling one or more of masking, flute width height ratio, flute length, flute density, flute shape, reducing plug length, flute taper, and flute volume asymmetry. Any of these techniques can be used alone or in combination to provide a filtration media pack having desired properties.
The Applicants have found that the extent of performance improvement of a filtration media pack increases as additional design characteristics of the media pack are controlled. For example, the performance of a media pack can be improved relative to a standard media pack from, for example, standard B flute media, by adjusting a single design criteria such as masking, flute width height ratio, flute length, flute density, flute shape, plug length, flute taper, and flute volume asymmetry. In addition, the Applicants have found that enhanced performance can be provided as a result of controlling an additional design criteria.
In an embodiment, the filtration media pack can be controlled to have a plurality of flutes having an average flute length of less than 5 inches, and can be controlled so that the filtration media pack exhibits a flute density (ρ) of at least 35.0 flute/inch2 according to the formula:
wherein the number of channels is counted and the media cross sectional area is measured. In addition, the filtration media pack can exhibit at least one of:
(i) at least one of the first portion of the plurality of flutes or the second portion of the plurality of flutes are closed as a result of plugs having an average plug length of less than 7 mm;
(ii) a flute width height ratio of greater than 2.5; or
(iii) a flute width height ration of less than 0.4.
In an alternative embodiment of the filtration media pack, the filtration media pack can be provided exhibiting a flute density of at least 35.0 flute/inch2, and can have an asymmetric volume arrangement so that a volume on one side of the media pack is greater than a volume on another side of the media pack by at least 10%.
In another alternative arrangement for the filtration media pack, the filtration media pack can have an average flute length of greater than about 4 inches, a flute width height ratio of greater than to 2.5 or less than 0.4, and an asymmetric volume arrangement so that the volume on one side of the media pack is greater than a volume on the other side of the media pack by at least 10%.
In another alternative filtration media pack according to the present invention, the filtration media pack can have an average flute length of greater than about 8 inches, a flute width height ratio of greater than 2.5 or a flute width height ratio of less than 0.4, and a non-asymmetric volume arrangement so that a volume on one side of the media pack is not greater than the volume on the other side of the media pack by, more than at least 10%.
The performance the filtration media pack can be improved by controlling the shape of the flutes. For example, the fluted media can have a single ridge extending along at least a portion of the flute between adjacent peaks. This flute shape can be referred to as “low contact.” The fluted sheet can include two ridges extending along at least a portion of the length of the flute between adjacent peaks. This shape of the flute can be referred to as “zero strain” or “Y” shaped. The fluted sheet can be constructed to provide a repeating pattern of one, two, or more ridges extending along at least 50% of the fluted length between an internal peak and an external peak. The repeating pattern can be provided between all adjacent peaks or between some repeating pattern that is less than all repeating peaks such as between every other repeating peak, between every third repeating peak, between every fourth repeating peak, etc. Portions of the fluted media need not include ridges extending between adjacent peaks.
Filter elements can be provided that includes the filtration media pack. The filter element includes a seal member extending around a periphery of the media pack. The seal member can include a seal surface constructed to engage a housing surface in a radially extending direction to provide a seal. Alternatively, the seal member can include a seal surface constructed to engage a housing surface in an axially extending direction to provide a seal. The seal member can be attached directly to the media pack or attached indirectly (via another structure such as a seal support) to the media pack
Methods for manufacturing a filtration media pack are provided. The method can include stacking or rolling a plurality of layers of single facer media to form the filtration media pack.
Methods for filtering a fluid are provided. The method can include feeding a fluid to one of a first face or a second face of a filtration media pack, and recovering fluid from the other of the first face or the second face of the filtration media pack.
The fluid that can be filtered by the filtration media pack includes gaseous substances and liquid substances. Exemplary gaseous substances that can be filtered includes air. Exemplary liquid substances that can be filtered include water, oil, fuel, and hydraulic fluid.
Fluted Filtration Media
Fluted filtration media can be used to provide fluid filter constructions in a variety of manners. One well known manner is as a z-filter construction. The terms “z-filter construction” or “z-filter media” as used herein, is meant to refer to a filter element construction in which individual ones of corrugated, folded, pleated, or otherwise formed filter flutes are used to define longitudinal filter flutes for fluid flow through the media; the fluid flowing along the flutes between inlet and outlet flow ends (or flow faces) of the filter element. Some examples of z-filter media filter elements are provided in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,820,646; 5,772,883; 5,902,364; 5,792,247; 5,895,574; 6,210,469; 6,190,432; 6,350,296; 6,179,890; 6,235,195; Des. 399,944; Des. 428,128; Des. 396,098; Des. 398,046; and, Des. 437,401; each of these fifteen cited references being incorporated herein by reference.
The fluid that can be filtered by the filtration media pack includes gaseous substance and liquid substances. Exemplary gaseous substances that can be filtered includes air. Exemplary liquid substances that can be filtered include water, oil, fuel, and hydraulic fluid. A preferred type of fluid to be filtered by the filtration media pack includes air. In general, much of the discussion is directed at filtering air. It should be understood, however, that the filtration media pack can be used to filter other gaseous substances and other liquid substances.
One type of z-filter media utilizes two media components joined together to form the media construction. The two components are: (1) a fluted (for example, corrugated) media sheet; and, (2) a facing media sheet. The facing media sheet is typically non-corrugated, however it can be corrugated, for example perpendicularly to the flute direction as described in International Publication No. WO 2005/077487, published Aug. 25, 2005, incorporated herein by reference. Alternatively, the facing sheet can be a fluted (for example, corrugated) media sheet and the flutes or corrugations may be aligned with or at angles to the fluted media sheet. Although the facing media sheet can be fluted or corrugated, it can be provided in a form that is not fluted or corrugated. Such a form can include a flat sheet. When the facing media sheet is not fluted, it can be referred to as a non-fluted media sheet or as a non-fluted sheet.
The type of z-filter media that utilizes two media components joined together to form the media construction wherein the two components are a fluted media sheet and a facing media sheet can be referred to as a “single facer media” or as a “single faced media.” In certain z-filter media arrangements, the single facer media (the fluted media sheet and the facing media sheet), together, can be used to define media having parallel inlet and outlet flutes. In some instances, the fluted sheet and non-fluted sheet are secured together and are then coiled to form a z-filter media construction. Such arrangements are described, for example, in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,235,195 and 6,179,890, each of which is incorporated herein by reference. In certain other arrangements, some non-coiled sections of fluted media secured to flat media, are stacked on one another, to create a filter construction. An example of this is described in FIG. 11 of U.S. Pat. No. 5,820,646, incorporated herein by reference. In general, arrangements where the z-filter media is coiled can be referred to as coiled arrangements, and arrangements where the z-filter media is stacked can be referred to as stacked arrangements. Filter elements can be provided having coiled arrangements or stacked arrangements.
Typically, coiling of the fluted sheet/facing sheet combination (e.g., the single facer media) around itself, to create a coiled media pack, is conducted with the facing sheet directed outwardly. Some techniques for coiling are described in International Publication No. WO 2004/082795, published Sep. 30, 2004, incorporated herein by reference. The resulting coiled arrangement generally has, as the outer surface of the media pack, a portion of the facing sheet, as a result. If desired, the single facer media can be coiled so that the fluted sheet forms the outer surface of the media pack.
The term “corrugated” used herein to refer to structure in media, is meant to refer to a flute structure resulting from passing the media between two corrugation rollers, i.e., into a nip or bite between two rollers, each of which has surface features appropriate to cause a corrugation affect in the resulting media. The term “corrugation” is not meant to refer to flutes that are formed by techniques not involving passage of media into a bite between corrugation rollers. However, the term “corrugated” is meant to apply even if the media is further modified or deformed after corrugation, for example by the folding techniques described in PCT WO 04/007054, published Jan. 22, 2004, incorporated herein by reference.
Corrugated media is a specific form of fluted media. Fluted media is media which has individual flutes (for example, formed by corrugating or folding or pleating) extending thereacross. Fluted media can be prepared by any technique that provides the desired flute shapes. While corrugating can be a useful technique for forming flutes having a particular size. When it is desirable to increase the height of the (0 flutes (the height is the elevation between peaks), corrugating techniques might not be practical and it may be desirable to fold or pleat the media. In general, pleating of media can be provided as a result of folding the media. In general, forming flutes by pleating can be referred to as micropleating. An exemplary technique for folding the media to provide pleats includes scoring and using pressure to create the fold.
Filter element or filter cartridge configurations utilizing z-filter media are sometimes referred to as “straight through flow configurations” or by variants thereof. In general, in this context what is meant is that the serviceable filter elements generally have an inlet flow end (or face) and an exit flow end (or face), with flow entering and exiting the filter cartridge in generally the same straight through direction. The term “straight through flow configuration” disregards, for this definition, air flow that passes out of the media pack through the outermost wrap of facing media. In some instances, each of the inlet flow end and outlet flow end can be generally flat or planar, with the two parallel to one another. However, variations from this, for example non-planar faces, are possible in some applications. Furthermore, the characterization of an inlet flow face and an opposite exit flow face is not a requirement that the inlet flow face and the outlet flow face are parallel. The inlet flow face and the exit flow face can, if desired, be provided as parallel to each other. Alternatively, the inlet flow face and the outlet flow face can be provided at an angle relative to each other so that the faces are not parallel. In addition, non-planar faces can be considered non-parallel faces.
A straight through flow configuration is, for example, in contrast to cylindrical pleated filter cartridges of the type shown in U.S. Pat. No. 6,039,778, in which the flow generally makes a substantial turn as its passes through the serviceable cartridge. That is, in a U.S. Pat. No. 6,039,778 filter, the flow enters the cylindrical filter cartridge through a cylindrical side, and then turns to exit through an end face in a forward-flow system. In a reverse-flow system, the flow enters the serviceable cylindrical cartridge through an end face and then turns to exit through a side of the cylindrical filter cartridge. An example of such a reverse-flow system is shown in U.S. Pat. No. 5,613,992.
The filter element or filter cartridge can be referred to as a serviceable filter element or filter cartridge. The term “serviceable” in this context is meant to refer to a media containing filter cartridge that is periodically removed and replaced from a corresponding air cleaner. An air cleaner that includes a serviceable filter element or filter cartridge is constructed to provide for the removal and replacement of the filter element or filter cartridge. In general, the air cleaner can include a housing and an access cover wherein the access cover provides for the removal of a spent filter element and the insertion of a new or cleaned (reconditioned) filter element.
The term “z-filter media construction” and variants thereof as used herein, without more, is meant to refer to any or all of: a single facer media containing a fluted media sheet and a facing media sheet with appropriate closure to inhibit air flow from one flow face to another without filtering passage through the filter media; and/or, a single facer media that is coiled or stacked or otherwise constructed or formed into a three dimensional network of flutes; and/or, a filter construction including a single facer media; and/or, a fluted media constructed or formed (e.g., by folding or pleating) into a three dimensional network of flutes. In general, it is desirable to provide an appropriate flute closure arrangement to inhibit unfiltered air that flows in one side (or face) of the media from flowing out the other side (or face) of the media as part of the filtered air stream leaving the media. In many arrangements, the z-filter media construction is configured for the formation of a network of inlet and outlet flutes, inlet flutes being open at a region adjacent an inlet face and being closed at a region adjacent an outlet face; and, outlet flutes being closed adjacent an inlet face and being open adjacent an outlet face. However, alternative z-filter media arrangements are possible, see for example U.S. 2006/0091084 A1, published May 4, 2006 to Baldwin Filters, Inc. also comprising flutes extending between opposite flow faces, with a seal arrangement to prevent flow of unfiltered air through the media pack. In many z-filter constructions according to the invention, adhesive or sealant can be used to close the flutes and provide an appropriate seal arrangement to inhibit unfiltered air from flowing from one side of the media to the other side of the media. Plugs, folds of media, or a crushing of the media can be used as techniques to provide closure of flutes to inhibit the flow of unfiltered air from one side of the media (face) to the other side of the media (face).
An alternative z-filter construction can be provided utilizing a fluted media sheet. For example, the fluted media sheet can be folded to create closures at the inlet flow face and the exit flow face. An example of this type of arrangement can be seen in, for example, U.S. 2006/0151383 to AAF-McQuay Inc. and WO 2006/132717 to Fleetguard, Inc., that describe fluted media having folds or bends perpendicular to the flute direction to seal the ends of the flutes.
Referring to
In the context of fluted filtration media, and in particular the exemplary media 1, the troughs 7b and hills 7a can be characterized as peaks. That is, the highest point of the hills 7a can be characterized as peaks and the lowest points of the troughs 7b can be characterized as peaks. The combination of the fluted sheet 3 and the facing sheet 4 can be referred to as the single facer media 5. The peaks formed at the troughs 7b can be referred to as internal peaks because they face toward the facing sheet 3 of the single facer media 5. The peaks formed at the hills 7a can be characterized as external peaks because they face away from the facing sheet 3 forming the single facer media 5. For the single facer media 5, the fluted sheet 3 includes repeating internal peaks at 7b that face toward the facing sheet 4, and repeating external peaks at 7a that face away from the facing sheet 4.
The term “regular” when used to characterize a flute pattern is not intended to characterize media that can be considered “tapered.” In general, a taper refers to a reduction or an increase in the size of the flute along a length of the flute. In general, filtration media that is tapered can exhibit a first set of flutes that decrease in size from a first end of the media to a second end of the media, and a second set of flutes that increase in size from the first end of the media to the second end of the media. In general, a tapered pattern is not considered a regular pattern. It should be understood, however, that z-media can contain regions that are considered regular and regions that are considered non-regular along the flute length. For example, a first set of flutes may be considered regular along a distance of the flute length, such as, one quarter the distance to three quarters the distance, and then for the remaining amount of the flute length can be considered non-regular as a result of the presence of a taper. Another possible flute configuration is to have a tapered-regular-tapered arrangement where, for example, a flute tapers from a first face to a pre-selected location, the flute then can be considered regular until a second pre-determined location, and then the flute tapers to the second face. Another alternative arrangement can be provided as a regular-taper-regular arrangement, or as a regular-taper arrangement. Various alternative arrangements can be constructed as desired.
In the context of z-media, there are generally two types of “asymmetry.” One type of asymmetry is referred to as area asymmetry, and the other type of asymmetry is referred to volume asymmetry. In general, area asymmetry refers to an asymmetry in flute cross-sectional area, and can be exhibited by tapered flutes. For example, area asymmetry exists if a fluted area at one location along the length of a flute is different from the fluted area at another location along the length of the flute. Because tapered flutes exhibit a decrease in size from a first location (e.g., end) to a second location (e.g., end) of the media pack or an increase in size from a first location (e.g., end) to a second location (e.g., end) of the media pack, there is an area asymmetry. This asymmetry (area asymmetry) is a type of asymmetry resulting from tapering and, as a result, media having this type of asymmetry can be referred to as non-regular. Another type of asymmetry can be referred to as volumetric asymmetry and will be explained in more detail. Volumetric asymmetry refers to a difference between a dirty side volume and a clean side volume within the filter media pack. Media exhibiting volume asymmetry can be characterized as regular if the wave pattern is regular, and the media can be characterized as non-regular if the wave pattern is non-regular.
Z-media can be provided where at least a portion of the flutes are closed to the passage of unfiltered air by a technique other than providing a plug of adhesive or sealant. For example, the ends of flutes can be folded or crushed to provide a closure. One technique for providing a regular and consistent fold pattern for closing flutes can be referred to as darting. Darted flutes or darting generally refers to the closure of a flute wherein the closure occurs by folding the flute to create a regular fold pattern to collapse the flutes toward the facing sheet to provide a closure rather than by crushing. Darting generally implies a systematic approach to closing the ends of flutes as a result of folding portions of the flute so that the flute closures are generally consistent and controlled. For example, U.S. Patent Publication No. US 2006/0163150 A1 discloses flutes having a darted configuration at the ends of the flutes. The darted configuration can provide advantages including, for example, a reduction in the amount of sealant needed to provide a seal, an increased security in the effectiveness of the seal, and a desirable flow pattern over the darted end of the flutes. Z-media can include flutes having darted ends, and the entire disclosure of U.S. Patent Publication No. US 2006/0163150 A1 is incorporated herein by reference. It should be understood that the existence of darts at the ends of flutes does not render the media non-regular.
In the context of the characterization of a “curved” wave pattern, the term “curved” is meant to refer to a pattern that is not the result of a folded or creased shape provided to the media, but rather the apex of each hill 7a and the bottom of each trough 7b is formed along a radiused curve. Although alternatives are possible, a typical radius for such z-filter media would be at least 0.25 mm and typically would be not more than 3 mm. Media that is not curved, by the above definition, can also be useable. For example, it can be desirable to provide peaks having a radius that is sufficiently sharp so that it is not considered “curved.” In general, if the radius is less than 0.25 mm, or less than 0.20 mm, the ridge or bottom can be characterized as bent, folded, or creased. In order to reduce masking, it can be desirable to provide a peak with a knife edge. The ability to provide a knife edge at the peak can be limited by the equipment used to form the media, the media itself, and the conditions under which the media is subjected. For example, it is desirable to not cut or tear the media. Accordingly, using a knife edge to create the peak can be undesirable if the knife edge causes a cut or tear in the media. Furthermore, the media can be too light or too heavy to provide a sufficiently non-curved peak without cutting or tearing. Furthermore, the humidity of the air during processing can be enhanced to help create a tighter radius when forming the peak.
An additional characteristic of the particular regular, curved, wave pattern depicted in
A characteristic of the particular regular, curved, wave pattern corrugated sheet 3 shown in
Referring to
In the example shown, adjacent edge 8 is provided sealant, in this instance in the form of a sealant bead 10, sealing the fluted sheet 3 and the facing sheet 4 together. Bead 10 will sometimes be referred to as a “single facer” bead, since it is a bead between the corrugated sheet 3 and the facing sheet 4, which forms the single facer media 5. Sealant bead 10 seals closed individual flutes 11 adjacent edge 8, to passage of air therefrom.
In the example shown, at adjacent edge 9 is provided sealant, in this instance in the form of a sealant bead 14. Sealant bead 14 generally closes flutes 15 to passage of unfiltered fluid therein, adjacent edge 9. Bead 14 would typically be applied as the media 2 is coiled about itself, with the corrugated sheet 3 directed to the inside. Thus, bead 14 will form a seal between a back side 17 of facing sheet 4, and side 18 of the fluted sheet 3. The bead 14 will sometimes be referred to as a “winding bead” since it is typically applied, as the strip 2 is coiled into a coiled media pack. If the media 2 is cut in strips and stacked, instead of coiled, bead 14 would be a “stacking bead.”
Referring to
In more general terms, a z-filter media pack can be characterized as comprising fluted filter media secured to facing filter media, and configured in a media pack of flutes extending between first and second flow faces. A sealant or seal arrangement is provided within the media pack, to ensure that air entering flutes at a first upstream flow face or edge cannot exit the media pack from a downstream flow face or edge, without filtering passage through the media. Alternately stated, a z-filter media pack is closed to passage of unfiltered air therethrough, between the inlet flow face and the outlet flow face, typically by a sealant arrangement or other arrangement. An additional alternative characterization of this is that a first portion of the flutes are closed or sealed to prevent unfiltered air from flowing into the first portion of flutes, and a second portion of the flutes are closed or sealed to prevent unfiltered air from flowing out of the second portion of flutes so that air passing into one of the first face or the second face of the media pack and out the other of the first face or the second face of the media pack passes through media to provide filtration of the air.
For the particular arrangement shown herein in
In general, the filter media is a relatively flexible material, typically a non-woven fibrous material (of cellulose fibers, synthetic fibers or both) often including a resin therein, sometimes treated with additional materials. Thus, it can be conformed or configured into the various fluted, for example corrugated, patterns, without unacceptable media damage. Also, it can be readily coiled or otherwise configured for use, again without unacceptable media damage. Of course, it must be of a nature such that it will maintain the required fluted (for example corrugated) configuration, during use.
In the corrugation or fluting process, an inelastic deformation is caused to the media. This prevents the media from returning to its original shape. However, once the tension is released the flutes or corrugations will tend to spring back, recovering only a portion of the stretch and bending that has occurred. The facing sheet is sometimes tacked to the fluted sheet, to inhibit this spring back in the fluted (or corrugated) sheet.
Also, the media can contain a resin. During the corrugation process, the media can be heated to above the glass transition point of the resin. When the resin cools, it will help to maintain the fluted shapes.
The media of the fluted sheet 3, facing sheet 4 or both, can be provided with a fine fiber material on one or both sides thereof, for example in accord with U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,955,775, 6,673,136, and 7,270,693, incorporated herein by reference. In general, fine fiber can be referred to as polymer fine fiber (microfiber and nanofiber) and can be provided on the media to improve filtration performance. As a result of the presence of fine fiber on the media, it may be possible or desirable to provide media having a reduced weight or thickness while obtaining desired filtration properties. Accordingly, the presence of fine fiber on media can provide enhanced filtration properties, provide for the use of thinner media, or both. Fiber characterized as fine fiber can have a diameter of about 0.001 micron to about 10 microns, about 0.005 micron to about 5 microns, or about 0.01 micron to about 0.5 micron. Nanofiber refers to a fiber having a diameter of less than 200 nanometer or 0.2 micron. Microfiber can refer to fiber having a diameter larger than 0.2 micron, but not larger than 10 microns. Exemplary materials that can be used to form the fine fibers include polyvinylidene chloride, polyvinyl alcohol polymers and co-polymers comprising various nylons such as nylon 6, nylon 4,6, nylon 6,6, nylon 6,10, and co-polymers thereof, polyvinyl chloride, PVDC, polystyrene, polyacrylonitrile, PMMA, PVDF, polyamides, and mixtures thereof.
Still referring to
From the above, it will be apparent that the exemplary fluted sheet 3 depicted is typically not secured continuously to the facing sheet, along the troughs or hills where the two adjoin. Thus, air can flow between adjacent inlet flutes, and alternately between the adjacent outlet flutes, without passage through the media. However, unfiltered air which has entered a flute through the inlet flow face cannot exit from a flute through the outlet flow face without passing through at least one sheet of media, with filtering.
Attention is now directed to
The flute height J is the distance from the facing sheet 44 to the highest point of the fluted sheet 43. Alternatively stated, the flute height J is the difference in exterior elevation between alternating peaks 57 and 58 of the fluted sheet 43. The flute height J takes into account the thickness of the fluted sheet 43. The peak 57 can be referred to as the internal peak (the peak directed toward the facing sheet 44), and the peak 58 can be referred to as the external peak (the peak directed away from the facing sheet 44). Although the distances D1, D2, and J are applied to the specific fluted media arrangement shown in
Another measurement can be referred to as the cord length (CL). The cord length refers to the straight line distance from the center point 50 of the lower peak 57 and the center point 45 of the upper peak 58. The thickness of the media and the decision where to begin or end a particular distance measurement can affect the distance value because the media thickness affects the distance value. For example, the cord length (CL) can have different values depending upon whether the distance is measured from the bottom of the internal peak to the bottom of the external peak or whether it is measured from the bottom of the internal peak to the top of the external peak. This difference in distance is an example of how the media thickness effects the distance measurement. In order to minimize the effect of the thickness of the media, the measurement for cord length is determined from a center point within the media. The relationship between the cord length CL and the media length D2 can be characterized as a media-cord percentage. The media-cord percentage can be determined according to the following formula:
In the corrugated cardboard industry, various standard flutes have been defined. These include, for example, the standard F flute, standard X flute, standard B flute, standard C flute, and standard A flute.
Donaldson Company, Inc., (DCI) the assignee of the present disclosure, has used variations of the standard A and standard B flutes, in a variety of z-filter arrangements. The DCI standard B flute can have a media-cord percentage of about 3.6%. The DCI standard A flute can have a media-cord percentage of about 6.3. Various flutes are also defined in Table 1 and
In general, standard flute configurations from the corrugated box industry have been used to define corrugation shapes or approximate corrugation shapes for corrugated media. Improved performance of filtration media can be achieved by providing a flute configuration or structure that enhances filtration. In the corrugated box board industry, the size of the flutes or the geometry of the corrugation was selected to provide a structure suited for handling a load. The flute geometry in the corrugated box industry developed the standard A flute or B flute configuration. While such flute configurations can be desirable for handling a load, filtration performance can be enhanced by altering the flute geometry. Techniques for improving filtration performance include selecting geometries and configurations that improve filtration performance in general, and that improve filtration performance under selected filtration conditions. Exemplary flute geometries and configurations that can be altered to improve filtration performance include flute masking, flute shape, flute width height ratio, and flute asymmetry. In view of the wide selection of flute geometries and configurations, the filter element can be configured with desired filter element geometries and configurations in view of the various flute geometries and configurations to improve filtration performance.
Masking
In the context of z-media, masking refers to the area of proximity between the fluted sheet and the facing sheet where there is a lack of substantial pressure difference resulting in a lack of useful filtration media when the filtration media is in use. In general, masked media is not useful for significantly enhancing the filtration performance of filtration media. Accordingly, it is desirable to reduce masking to thereby increase the amount of filtration media available for filtration and thereby increase the capacity of the filtration media, increase the throughput of the filtration media, decrease the pressure drop of the filtration media, or some or all of these.
In the case of a fluted sheet arranged in a pattern with broad radii at the peaks as shown in
Attempts have been made to reduce the radii of contact between the fluted sheet and the facing sheet. For example, see U.S. Pat. No. 6,953,124 to Winter et al. An example of reducing the radii is shown in
Increasing the Surface Area of Media
Filtration performance can be enhanced by increasing the amount of filtration media available for filtration. Reducing masking can be considered a technique for increasing the surface area of media available for filtration.
Now referring to
Now referring to
The configuration of the fluted media can be characterized by the flute width height ratio. The flute width height ratio is the ratio of the flute period length D1 to the flute height J. The flute width height ratio can be expressed by the following formula:
Measured distances such as flute period length D1 and the flute height J can be characterized as average values for the filtration media along the flute length excluding 20% of the flute length at each end. The distances can be measured away from the ends of the flutes. It is typically the ends of the flutes that have a sealant or closure. The flute width height ratio calculated at a flute closure would not necessarily represent the flute width height ratio of the flute where the filtration is taking place. Accordingly, the measure of flute width height ratio can be provided as an average value over the flute length with the exception of the last 20% of the flute length near the ends of the flutes to remove the effects of flute closure when the flutes are closed at or near the ends. For “regular” media, it is expected that the flute period length D1 and the flute height J will be relatively constant along the flute length. By relatively constant, it is meant that the flute width height ratio can vary within about 10% over the length of the flute excluding the 20% length at each end where flute closure designs may affect the width height ratio. In addition, in the case of a “non-regular” media, such as, media having tapered flutes, the flute width height ratio can vary or remain about the same over the length of the flute. By adjusting the flute shape away from a theoretical equilateral triangle shape, the amount of media in a given volume available for filtration can be increased. Accordingly, flutes having a flute width height ratio of at least about 2.2, at least about 2.5, at least about 2.7, or at least about 3.0 can provide an increased surface area of media available for filtration. In addition, providing a flute design having a width height ratio of less than about 0.45, less than about 0.40, less than about 0.37, or less than about 0.33 can provide increased media area available for filtration. In general, a theoretical flute having an equilateral triangle shape represents a flute width height ratio of about 1.6.
Another technique for increasing the amount of filtration media available for filtration includes increasing the flute density of the media pack. The flute density refers to the number of flutes per cross-sectional area of filtration media in a filtration media pack. The flute density depends on a number of factors including the flute height J, the flute period D1, and the media thickness T. The flute density can be characterized as a media pack flute density or as a single facer media flute density. The equation for calculating the media pack flute density (ρ) for a filter element is:
The flute density of a filter element can be calculated by counting the number of channels including those channels that are open and those channels that are closed in a cross sectional area of the filter element, and dividing that by two times the cross sectional area of the filter element at the location where the number of channels was determined. In general, it is expected that the flute density will remain relatively constant across the length of the filter element from the inlet flow face to the outlet flow face, or vice versa. It should be understood that the z-media cross sectional are refers to the cross sectional area of the media (wound or stacked) and not necessarily to the cross sectional area of the filter element. The filter element may have a sheath or a seal intended to engage a housing that would provide the filter element with a cross-sectional area that is greater than the cross-sectional area of the media. Furthermore, the cross-sectional area of the media refers to the effective area. That is, if the media is wound around a core or mandrel, the cross-sectional area of the core or mandrel is not part of the z-media pack cross-sectional area. Furthermore, the number of channels refers to the number of channels in the effective area.
An alternative equation for the calculation of flute density (ρ) for a single facer media is:
In the equation for flute density per single facer media, J is the flute height, D1 is the flute period length, and T is the thickness of the fluted sheet. This alternate equation can be referred to as the equation for calculating the single facer media flute density. The single facer media flute density is determined based upon the configuration of the single facer media. In contrast, the media pack flute density is determined based upon the assembled media pack
Theoretically, the media pack flute density and the single facer media flute density should provide similar results. However, it is possible that the media pack may be configured in such a way that the media pack flute density and the single facer media flute density provide different results.
The standard B flute shown in
In general, providing media having increased flute density has a tendency to increase the surface area of media within a volume of the media and, therefore, has a tendency to increase the loading capacity of the filtration media. Accordingly, increasing the flute density of media can have the effect of enhancing the loading capacity of the media. However, increasing the flute density of media can have the effect of increasing the pressure drop through the media assuming other factors remain constant. Furthermore, decreasing the flute density for filtration media can have the effect of decreasing initial pressure drop.
Increasing the flute density of filtration media has the effect of decreasing the flute height (J) or the flute period length (D1), or both. As a result, the size of the flute (the size of the flute refers to cross sectional area of the flute) tends to decrease as flute density increases. As a result, smaller flute sizes have the effect of increasing the pressure drop across the filtration media. In general, the reference to a pressure drop across the media refers to the pressure differential determined at a first face of the media relative to the pressure measured at second face of the media, wherein the first face and the second face are provided at generally opposite ends of a flute. In order to provide a filtration media having a relatively high flute density while retaining a desired pressure drop, the flute length can be decreased. The flute length refers to the distance from the first face of the filtration media to the second face of the filtration media. In the case of filtration media useful for filtering air for combustion engines, short length flutes can be characterized as those flutes having a flute length of less than about 5 inches (e.g., about 1 inch to about 5 inches, or about 2 inches to about 4 inches). Medium length flutes can be characterized as those flutes having a length of about 5 inches to about 8 inches. Long length flutes can be characterized as those flutes having a flute length of greater than about 8 inches (e.g., about 8 inches to about 12 inches).
Flute Shape
Another technique for increasing the amount of filtration media available for filtration within a media pack includes selecting a flute shape that provides for an increased amount of filtration media available for filtration compared with standard flute designs such as those described in Table 1. One technique for providing a flute shape that increases the amount of filtration media available for a filtration is by creating a ridge between adjacent peaks. As discussed previously, adjacent peaks can be characterized as an internal peak and an external peak depending upon whether the peak is facing toward the facing sheet or away from the facing sheet.
Now referring to
The media 110, 120, and 140 can be arranged to provide filter elements for cleaning a fluid such as air. The filter elements can be arranged as coiled elements or stacked elements. Coiled elements generally include a fluted media sheet and a facing media sheet that is wound to provide the coiled construction. The coil construction can be provided having a shape that is characterized as round, obround, or racetrack. A stacked construction generally includes alternating layers of media comprising fluted media sheet adhered to facing media sheet. The media 110, 120, and 140 shown in
In
For the exemplary fluted sheet 112, the relatively flatter portion of the fluted media 118a can be seen in
The ridge 118 can be provided as a result of coining, creasing, bending, or folding along a length of the fluted sheet 112 during the formation of the fluted media 12. It may be desirable, but it is not necessary, during the step of forming the fluted media 112 to take the steps to set the ridge 118. For example, the ridge 118 can be set by heat treatment or moisture treatment or a combination thereof. In addition, the ridge 118 can exist as a result of coining, creasing, bending, or folding to form the ridge without an additional step of setting the ridge. Furthermore, the characterization of a ridge 118 is not to be confused with the fluted sheet external peaks 115 or 119 and the fluted sheet internal peaks 116 or 114. The characterization of a generally flatter portion 118a and a generally steeper portion 118b is intended as a way to characterize the presence of a ridge. In general, it is expected that the flatter portion 118a and the steeper portion 118b will exhibit a curve. That is, it is expected that the flatter portion 118a and the steeper portion 118b will not be completely planar, particularly as fluids such as air flows through the media during filtration. Nevertheless, the angle of the media can be measured from the ridge to the corresponding, adjacent peak to provide the average angle of that portion of the media.
The shape of the media depicted in Figure SA can be referred to as a low contact shape. In general, the low contact shape refers to the relatively low area of contact between the fluted sheet 112 and the facing sheet 111. The presence of the ridge 118 helps provide for reduced masking at the peaks 115 and 119. The ridge 118 exists as a result of deforming the fluted sheet 112 and, as a result, reduces the internal stress on the media at the peaks 115 and 119. Without the presence of the ridge 118, there would likely exist a level of internal tension in the fluted sheet 112 that would cause the fluted sheet 112 to create a greater radius at the peaks 115 and 119, and thereby increase masking. As a result, the presence of the ridge 118 helps increase the amount of media present between adjacent peaks (e.g., peaks 115 and 114) and helps decrease the radius of a peak (e.g., peak 115) as a result of relieving, to a certain extent, the tension within the fluted sheet 112 that would cause it to expand or flatten out at the peaks in the absence of the ridge.
The presence of a ridge 118 can be detected by visual observation.
Now referring to
Although the fluted sheet 112 can be provided having two ridges 118 along each length D2, the fluted sheet 112 can be provided having a single ridge along each period length D2, if desired, and can be provided having a configuration where some of the periods exhibit at least one ridge, some periods exhibit two ridges, and some periods exhibit no ridge, or any combination thereof. The fluted sheet can be provided as having a repeating pattern of ridges. A repeating pattern of ridges means that the wave pattern exhibits a pattern of ridges. The pattern of ridges may be between every adjacent peak, every other adjacent peak, every third adjacent peak, or some variation that can be perceived over the wave pattern of the media as exhibiting a repeating pattern of ridges.
The characterization of the presence of a ridge should be understood to mean that the ridge is present along a length of the flute. In general, the ridge can be provided along the flute for a length sufficient to provide the resulting media with the desired performance. While the ridge may extend the entire length of the flute, it is possible that the ridge will not extend the entire length of the flute as a result of, for example, influences at the ends of the flute. Exemplary influences include flute closure (e.g., darting) and the presence of plugs at the ends of flutes. Preferably, the ridge extends at least 20% of the flute length. By way of example, the ridge can extend at least 30% of the flute length, at least 40% of the flute length, at least 50% of the flute length, at least 60% of the flute length, or at least 80% of the flute length. The ends of the flutes may be closed in some manner and that as a result of the closure, one may or may not be able to detect the presence of a ridge when viewing the media pack from a face. Accordingly, the characterization of the presence of a ridge as extending along a length of the flute does not mean that the ridge must extend along the entire length of the flute. Furthermore, the ridge may not be detected at the ends of the flute. Attention is directed to the photograph of
Now referring to
The ridge 128 can be characterized as the area where a relatively flatter portion of the fluted media 128a joins a relatively steeper portion of the fluted media 128b. In general, the relatively flatter portion of the fluted media 128a can be characterized as having an angle of less than 45° and preferably less than about 30° wherein the angle is measured between the ridge 128 and the ridge 129, and relative to the facing sheet 123. The relatively steeper portion of the fluted media 128b can be characterized as having an angle of greater than 45° and preferably greater than about 60° wherein the angle is measured from the peak 126 to the ridge 128, and relative to the facing sheet 123. The ridge 129 can be provided as a result of the intersection of the relatively flatter portion of the fluted media 129a and the relatively steeper portion of the fluted media 129b. In general, the relatively flatter portion of the fluted media 129a corresponds to the angle of the portion of the media extending from the ridge 128 to the ridge 129. In general, the relatively flatter portion of the fluted media 129a can be characterized as having a slope of less than 45°, and preferably less than about 30°. The relatively steeper portion of the fluted media 129b can be characterized as that portion of the fluted media extending between the ridge 129 and the peak 125 and can be characterized as having an angle between the ridge 129 and the peak 125 and relative to the facing sheet 123. In general, the relatively steeper portion of the fluted media 129b can be characterized as having an angle of greater than 45° and preferably greater than about 60°.
Now referring to
The ridges 148 and 149 can be characterized as the areas where a relatively flatter portion of the fluted sheet joins a relatively steeper portion of the fluted sheet. In the case of the ridge 148, a relatively flatter portion of the fluted sheet 148a joins a relatively steeper portion of the fluted sheet 148b. In the case of the ridge 149, a relatively flatter portion of the fluted sheet 149a joins a relatively steeper portion of the fluted sheet 149b. The relatively steeper portion of the fluted media can be characterized as having an angle of greater than 45° and preferably greater than about 60° when measured for that portion of the media relative to the facing sheet 143. The relatively flatter portion can be characterized as having a slope of less than 45° and preferably less than about 300 for that portion of the media relative to the facing sheet 143.
The fluted sheet 142 can be considered more advantageous to prepare relative to the fluted sheet 122 because the wrap angle of the fluted sheet 142 can be less than the wrap angle for the fluted sheet 122. In general, the wrap angle refers to the sum of angles resulting in media turns during the step of fluting. In the case of the fluted media 142, the media is turned less during fluting compared with the fluted media 122. As a result, by fluting to form the fluted sheet 142, the required tencile strength of the media is lower compared with the fluted sheet 122.
The fluted sheets 112, 122, and 142 are shown as relatively symmetrical from peak to peak. That is, for the fluted sheets 112, 122, and 142, the flutes repeat having the same number of ridges between adjacent peaks. Adjacent peaks refer to the peaks next to each other along a length of fluted media. For example, for the fluted media 112, peaks 114 and 115 are considered adjacent peaks. A period of media, however, need not have the same number of ridges between adjacent peaks, and the media can be characterized as asymmetrical in this manner. That is, the media can be prepared having a ridge on one half of the period and not having a ridge on the other half of the period.
By providing a single ridge or multiple ridges between adjacent peaks of the fluted media, the distance D2 can be increased relative to prior art media such as standard A and B flutes. As a result of the presence of a ridge or a plurality of ridges, it is possible to provide filtration media having more media available for filtration compared with, for example, standard A flutes and B flutes. The previously described measurement of media-cord percentage can be used to characterize the amount of media provided between adjacent peaks. The length D2 is defined as the length of the fluted sheets 112, 122, and 142 for a period of the fluted sheets 112, 122, and 142. In the case of the fluted sheet 112, the distance D2 is the length of the fluted sheet from the lower peak 114 to the lower peak 116. This distance includes two ridges 118. In the case of the fluted sheet 122, the length D2 is the distance of the fluted sheet 122 from the lower peak 124 to the lower peak 126. This distance includes at least four ridges 128 and 129. The existence of increased filtration media between adjacent peaks as a result of providing one or more ridge (or crease) between the adjacent peaks can be characterized by the media-cord percentage. As discussed previously, standard B flutes and standard A flutes typically exhibit a media-cord percentage of about 3.6% and about 6.3%, respectively. In general, low contact flutes such as the flute design shown in
The filtration media 120 and 140 in
An advantage of using the filtration media 120 where the fluted sheet 122 contains ridges 128 and ridges 129 is the ability to taper the flutes without creating excessive strain, and the ability to use filtration media that need not exhibit a strain greater than 12%. In general, strain can be characterized by the following equation:
D2 min refers to the media distance where the media is relaxed or without strain, and D2 max refers to the media distance under strain at a point prior to tear. Filtration media that can withstand a strain of up to about 12% without ripping or tearing is fairly commonly used in the filtration industry. Commonly used filtration media can be characterized as cellulosic based. In order to increase the strain that the media can withstand, synthetic fibers can be added to the media. As a result, it can be fairly expensive to use media that must withstand a strain greater than 12%. Accordingly, it is desirable to utilize a flute configuration that provides for tapering of the flute while minimizing the strain on the media, and avoiding the necessity of using expensive media that can tolerate higher strains than 12%.
Now referring to
The flute shapes exemplified in
The single facer media configurations shown in
Flute Volume Asymmetry
Flute volume asymmetry refers to a volumetric difference within a filter element or filter cartridge between the upstream volume and the downstream volume. The upstream volume refers to the volume of the media that receives the unfiltered fluid (e.g., air), and the downstream volume refers to the volume of the media that receives the filtered fluid (e.g., air). Filter elements can additionally be characterized as having a dirty side and a clean side. In general, the dirty side of filtration media refers to the volume of media that receives the unfiltered fluid. The clean side refers to the volume of media that receives the filtered fluid that has passed via filtering passage from the dirty side. It can be desirable to provide a media having a dirty side or upstream volume that is greater than the clean side or downstream volume. It has been observed that in the case of filtering air, particulates in the air are deposited on the dirty side and, as a result, the capacity of the filtration media can be determined by the volume of the dirty side. By providing volume asymmetry, it is possible to increase the volume of the media available for receiving the dirty air and thereby increase the capacity of the media pack.
Filtration media having a flute volume asymmetry exists when the difference between the upstream volume and the downstream volume is greater than 10%. Filtration media have a flute volume asymmetry can be referred to as a media pack having an asymmetric volume arrangement. Flute volume asymmetry can be expressed by the following formula:
Preferably, media exhibiting volume asymmetry has volume asymmetry of greater than about 10%, greater than about 20%, greater than 30%, and preferably greater than about 50%. Exemplary ranges for flute volume asymmetry include about 30% to about 250%, and about 50% to about 200%. In general, it may be desirable for the upstream volume to be greater than the downstream volume when it is desirable to maximize the life of the media. Alternatively, there may be situations where it is desirable to minimize the upstream volume relative to the downstream volume. For example, in the case of a safety element, it may be desirable to provide a safety element having a relatively low upstream volume so that the media fills and prevents flow relatively quickly as an indicator that failure has occurred in an upstream filter element.
The volume asymmetry can be calculated by measuring the cross-sectional surface area of flutes from a photograph showing a sectional view of the flutes. If the flutes form a regular pattern, this measurement will yield the flute volume asymmetry. If the flutes are not regular (e.g., tapered), then one can take several sections of the media and calculate the flute volume asymmetry using accepted interpolation or extrapolation techniques.
Flute design can be adjusted to provide a flute asymmetry that enhances filtration. In general, flute asymmetry refers to forming flutes having narrower peaks and widened arching troughs, or vice versa so that the upstream volume and downstream volume for the media are different. An example of asymmetric volume arrangement is provided in U.S. Patent Application Publication No. US 2003/0121845 to Wagner et al. The disclosure of U.S. Patent Application Publication No. US 2003/0121845 is incorporated herein by reference.
Now referring to
Filtration media having an asymmetric volume arrangement can result from the presence of regular flutes or tapered flutes. Furthermore, media having relatively symmetric tapered flutes (e.g., flutes tapering in each direct to relatively the same extent), can provide media having a lack of an asymmetric volume arrangement (less than 10% volume asymmetry). Accordingly, the existence or non-existence of tapered flutes does not imply or mean that existence or non-existence of an asymmetric volume arrangement. Media having a regular flute arrangement (e.g., non-tapered) may or may not exhibit an asymmetric volume arrangement.
The media pack can be provided so that flutes within the media pack are both regular and tapered. For example, the flutes can be provided so that along the length of the flute, the flute at one portion of the length is tapered and at another portion of the length is regular. An exemplary arrangement include, for example, a taper-straight-taper arrangement where the flute tapers from one face to a predetermined location and then exhibits a regular arrangement until another predetermined location and then exhibits a taper. The existence of a taper-straight-taper arrangement can be used to help provide volume asymmetry, and can be used to help handle loading and pressure drop.
Darted Flutes
An exemplary darting technique that can be used to close flutes in filtration media according to the invention is shown in
In general, darting can occur to provide closure after a facer bead 190 is applied for securing a fluted sheet 204 to a facer sheet 206. In general, and as described in U.S. Patent Publication No. US 2006/0163150, an indenting or darting wheel can be used to form the flutes 200 as shown in
While the flute double peak 216 shown in
Attention is now directed to
Still referring to
In
The terms “upper” and “lower” as used in this context are meant specifically to refer to the fold 220, when viewed from the orientation of
Based upon these characterizations and review of
A third layer 228 can also be seen pressed against the second layer 224. The third layer 228 is formed by folding from opposite inner ends 230, 231 of the third layer 228. In certain preferred implementations, the facing sheet 206 will be secured to the fluted sheet 196 along the edge opposite from the fold arrangement 218.
Another way of viewing the fold arrangement 218 is in reference to the geometry of alternating peaks 204 and troughs 205 of the corrugated sheet 196. The first layer 222 includes the inverted peak 210. The second layer 224 corresponds to the double peak 216 that is folded toward, and in preferred arrangements, folded against the inverted peak 210. It should be noted that the inverted peak 210 and the double peak 216, corresponding to the second layer 224, is outside of the troughs 205 on opposite sides of the peak 204. In the example shown, there is also the third layer 228, which extends from folded over ends 230, 231 of the double peak 216.
Although the flute closure shown in
A process used to provide a dart according to
While the closure technique described in the context of
Plug Length and Flute Height
Z-media is sometimes characterized as having flutes extending from an inlet face to an outlet face of the media, and a first portion of the flutes can be characterized as inlet flutes and a second portion of the flutes can be characterized as outlet flutes. The inlet flutes can be provided with a plug or seal near or at the outlet face. Furthermore, the outlet flutes can be provided with a plug or seal near or at the inlet face. Of course, alternatives of this arrangement are available. For example, the seals or plugs need not be provided at or adjacent to the inlet face or outlet face. The seals or plugs can be provided away from the inlet face or the outlet face, if desired. In the case of hot melt adhesive being used as a seal or plug, it is often found that the plug has a length of at least about 12 mm in standard 13 fluted media. The plug length can be measured from the face of the element to the inner surface of the plug. The applicants have found that by reducing the plug length, it is possible to provide desirable characteristics of the filtration media including increased loading capacity, lower initial pressure drop, increased surface area of media available for filtration, reduced the amount of filtration media needed for a filter element, or combinations thereof. It can be desirable to provide a plug length that is less than about 10 mm, less than about 8 mm, less than about 7 mm, and even more preferably less than about 6 mm. Reducing the plug length can provide increased performance in the situation where the flute length is relatively short (e.g., a flute length of less than about 5 inches). Decreasing the plug length for a relatively long flute length (e.g., greater than 8 inches) may not be as effective for enhancing performance compared with reducing plug length for media having a shorter flute length. For shorter length flutes, for example, flutes having a length of less than about 5 inches (e.g., about 2 inches to about 4 inches), reducing the plug length to less than about 7 mm or less than about 6 mm can provide enhanced performance. The plug length can be referred to as an average plug length, and can be measured as the average plug length of the plugs sealing the first plurality of flutes or sealing the second plurality of flutes or both. That is, the average plug length can be reduced for the plugs present at or near one of the faces of the media pack. There is no requirement that the average plug length is an average plug length for all seals within the media pack. That is, the average plug length for the first portion of flutes can be different from the plug length for the second portion of flutes. The average plug length can be provided as an average plug length for all of the seals (e.g., for the first plurality of flutes and for the second plurality of flutes), if desired.
An exemplary technique for reducing plug length is to trim the edge of the single facer that contains sealant or adhesive holding the fluted sheet to the facing sheet as a way to reduce the plug length. That is, the width of single facer during production can be longer than necessary with the understanding that the width of the single facer will be trimmed to reduce the plug length. In addition, the plug length can be reduced by trimming one or both faces of the media. An alternative technique for reducing plug length is to use a thicker or more viscous sealant material to provide a seal or plug having a shorter length.
The flute height (J) can be selected depending upon the desired flute height or flute size for the resulting filtration media. The conditions of use for the filtration media can be relied upon to select the desired flute height (J). In the case where a filter element utilizing the media according to the present invention is used as a substitute for a conventional filter element that utilizes, for example, a standard B flute, the height J can be about 0.075 inch to about 0.150 inch. In the case where a filter element utilizing the media according to the present invention is used as a substitute for a conventional filter element that utilizes, for example, a standard A flute, the height J can be about 0.15 inch to about 0.25 inch.
Exemplary Media Definitions
In the case of z-media useful for air filtration applications, and in particular for filtering an air stream for an internal combustion engine, the definition of the filtration media can be selected depending upon whether the filtration media is intended maximize dust loading capacity, minimize pressure drop, or provide a desirable level of both capacity and pressure drops. The dust loading capacity can refer to the life or longevity of the filtration media. Sometimes it is desirable to design a filtration media that is capable of exhibiting a desired life span before it needs to be replaced. Alternatively, in certain circumstances, it may be more desirable to design a filtration media that is capable of performing within a desired pressure drop range. The selection of various definitions for the filtration media provides the flexibility for defining the filtration media for a particular environment and for a particular air cleaner. In addition, selecting the various definitions of the filtration media allows one to have flexibility in designing an air cleaner to fit a particular environment.
The following described exemplary filtration media can be provided with or without the flute shape referred to earlier as “low contact” or “zero strain.” The provision of a ridge or multiple ridges between peaks in a fluted media is not a requirement of the filtration media, but can be relied upon for enhancing performance.
A first exemplary filtration media can be selected for maximizing dust loading capacity. The flute density can be selected so that it is greater than the flute density of filter media prepared from Standard B flute media. For example, the filtration media can be provided having a flute density of at least about 35.0 flute/inch2, wherein the flute density is calculated according to the formula:
wherein the number of channels is determined by counting the channels in a cross section of the media and the location where the media cross sectional area is determined. Preferably, the flute density can be greater than 45 flute/inch2 or greater than about 50 flute/inch2. In order to reduce pressure drop caused by the increase in flute density, the flute length can be decreased. For example, the media can be provided having a flute length of less than 5 inches. Because of the relatively short flute length, the plug length can be provided as relatively short in order to increase the amount of media available for filtration. For example, the plugs can be provided having a length of less than about 7 mm, and preferably less than about 6 mm. In addition, the flute volume asymmetry of the media can be adjusted. For example, the flute volume asymmetry of the media can be provided so that the upstream volume is at least 10 percent greater than the downstream volume. Preferably, the flute volume asymmetry can be greater than 30%, and preferably greater than 50%. The fluted media can be provided having a flute width height ratio of at least about 2.7, and preferably at least about 3.0.
A second exemplary media can be selected for providing a desired long life. The second exemplary media can have a medium flute length. For example, the flute length can be about 5 inches to about 8 inches. The second exemplary media can be provided without a taper, and can be provided having a flute density of about 34 flutes/inch2 which is about the flute density of Standard B media. The second exemplary media can be provided having a flute width height ratio of greater than about 2.7, and preferably greater than about 3.0. In addition, the second exemplary media can be provided having a flute volume asymmetry of greater than 20%, and preferably greater than 30%.
A third exemplary filtration media can be provided so that the media exhibits a desired low pressure drop. The third exemplary filtration media can have a relatively low flute density of less than about 34 flute/inch2, and preferably less than about 25 flute/inch2. In addition, the flute length of the media can be medium length or long, and can have a length of at least about 5 inches and can have a length of about 6 inches to about 12 inches. The third exemplary filtration media can be provided with or without flute volume asymmetry. When provided with flute volume asymmetry, the media can have a flute volume asymmetry of greater than about 30%, or greater than about 70%. The flutes can be provided as tapered or non-tapered.
A fourth exemplary filtration media can be provided to balance the desired level of dust loading and the desired pressure drop. The fourth exemplary filtration media can be provided having relatively long flutes. For example, the flute length of the media can be about 8 inches to about 12 inches. The fourth exemplary filtration media can be provided with or without a taper.
Filter Elements
Now referring to
The filtration media pack can be provided as part of a filter element containing a radial seal as described in, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 6,350,291, U.S. Patent Application No. US 2005/0166561, and International Publication No. WO 2007/056589, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference. For example, referring to
The filtration media pack can be provided as part of a filter element having a variation on the radial seal configuration. As shown in
The filtration media pack can be provided as part of a filter element according to U.S. Pat. No. 6,235,195, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. Now referring to
Now referring to
The handle arrangement 404 includes a center board 408, handles 410, and a hook construction 412. The single facer media can be wound around the center board 408 so that the handles 410 extend axially from a first face 414 of the media pack 402. The hook arrangement 412 can extend from the second face 416 of the media pack 402. The handles 410 allow an operator to remove the filter element 400 from a housing. The hook construction 412 provides for attachment to a cross brace or support structure 420. The hook construction 412 includes hook members 422 and 424 that engage the cross brace or support structure 420. The cross brace or support structure 420 can be provided as part of a seal support structure 430 that extends from the second face 416 and includes a seal support member 432. A seal 434 can be provided on the seal support member to provide a seal between the filter element 400 and a housing. The seal 434 can be characterized as a radial seal when the seal is intended to provide sealing as a result of contact of a radially facing seal surface 436 and a housing seal surface.
The filtration media pack can be provided as part of a gas turbine system as shown in U.S. Pat. No. 6,348,085, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. An exemplary gas turbine filtration element is shown at reference number 450 in
Another filter element that can utilize the filtration media pack is described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,610,126, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. Now referring to
The filtration media pack can be provided as a stacked media pack arrangement according to International Publication No. WO 2006/076479 and International Publication No. WO 2006/076456, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference. Now referring to
The filtration media pack can be provided as a stacked media pack arrangement according to International Publication No. WO 2007/133635, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. Now referring to
It should be appreciated that, in view of exemplary
Filter elements having media containing various flute designs were compared using filter media performance modeling software. The filter elements were not constructed and tested for this example. Instead, the dimensions of the filter elements and the filter element components, the properties and characteristics of the filter elements and the filter element components, the conditions of use, and the characteristics of the air being filtered were inputted into a computer program that models filter media performance. The filter media performance modeling software was validated based upon tests run on actual Donaldson Company filter media. The results of the computer software modeling are expected to have an error within about 10%. For the purpose of evaluating different filter media design alternatives, it is believed that an error value of within about 10% is sufficiently low that the modeling software can be used to evaluate various design options. For purposes of the computer modeling software, the dust selected is characterized as SAE.
Tables 2-8 include a characterization of the filter element and the computer generated results. The tables identify the size of the element evaluated using the filter media performance modeling software. The element size refers to the overall size of the element.
The filter elements characterized in each of the tables are stacked elements having a depth or flute length corresponding to the last identified dimension. For example, in Table 2(a), the element has a size of 8 inches×12 inches×5 inches where the flute length is 5 inches. For element 1, the flute type can be characterized as standard B. For runs 2 and 3, the shape of the element has been changed while keeping the volume of the element relatively constant. Beginning with element 4, the flute type can no longer be considered standard B, and is characterized as arc-flat-arc which generally describes a flute shape having arcs forming the internal peaks and the external peaks of a fluted sheet, and a relatively flat portion of media connecting an internal peak and an external peak. For elements 17-19, the flute type can be characterized as low contact. The low contact shape is generally shown in
The filter elements in Tables 2-8 are additionally characterized by the flute density, volume asymmetry, flute width/height ratio, flute height, flute pitch, plug length, and media thickness. As a result of this information, the computer modeling software calculates the initial pressure drop, the SAE fine loading to 12 inches water pressure drop, the volume, and the area of media required. These values are determined for a specified flow rate through the media. In addition, the tables include comparisons with the base filter. In general, the base filter for a table refers to the first listed element in that table. As a result, performance changes can be evaluated among different elements as a result of changes to the design.
The general teaching demonstrated by the data in tables 2-8 is that multiple changes in the design of the filter element can significantly improve performance. In addition, single changes do not necessarily provide the large amounts of improvement compared with multiple changes.
The above specification, examples and data provide a complete description of the manufacture and use of the filtration media and filter element of the invention. Since many embodiments of the invention can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention, the invention resides in the claims hereinafter appended.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 16/735,412, filed Jan. 6, 2020, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/221,824, filed Jul. 28, 2016, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,525,397, issued Jan. 7, 2020, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/040,929, filed Sep. 30, 2013, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,433,884, issued Sep. 6, 2016, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/215,718, filed Jun. 26, 2008, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,545,589, issued Oct. 1, 2013, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/937,162, filed Jun. 26, 2007, the contents of which are herein incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2058669 | Dollinger | Oct 1936 | A |
2410371 | Gordon | Oct 1946 | A |
2514505 | Morton | Jul 1950 | A |
2514506 | Mueller | Jul 1950 | A |
2599604 | Bauer et al. | Jun 1952 | A |
2908350 | Buckman | Oct 1959 | A |
2960145 | Ruegenberg | Nov 1960 | A |
2980208 | Neumann | Apr 1961 | A |
3025963 | Bauer | Mar 1962 | A |
3053309 | Wilson et al. | Sep 1962 | A |
3058594 | Hultgren | Oct 1962 | A |
3062378 | Briggs | Nov 1962 | A |
3077148 | Mumby | Feb 1963 | A |
3146197 | Getzin | Aug 1964 | A |
3198336 | Hyslop | Aug 1965 | A |
3293833 | George | Dec 1966 | A |
3372533 | Rummel | Mar 1968 | A |
3485485 | Faigle | Dec 1969 | A |
3531920 | Hart | Oct 1970 | A |
3799354 | Buckman et al. | Mar 1974 | A |
3807150 | Maracle | Apr 1974 | A |
3948712 | Stannard | Apr 1976 | A |
4102792 | Harris | Jul 1978 | A |
4154688 | Pall | May 1979 | A |
4268290 | Barrington | May 1981 | A |
4290889 | Erickson | Sep 1981 | A |
4310419 | Nara et al. | Jan 1982 | A |
4389315 | Crocket | Jun 1983 | A |
4410316 | Yoke | Oct 1983 | A |
4410427 | Wydeven | Oct 1983 | A |
4439321 | Taki et al. | Mar 1984 | A |
4452619 | Wright et al. | Jun 1984 | A |
4488966 | Schaeffer | Dec 1984 | A |
4537812 | Elbers | Aug 1985 | A |
4589983 | Wydevan | May 1986 | A |
4615804 | Wright | Oct 1986 | A |
4617072 | Merz | Oct 1986 | A |
4652286 | Takao | Mar 1987 | A |
4732678 | Humbert, Jr. | Mar 1988 | A |
4735720 | Kersting | Apr 1988 | A |
4766453 | Shiokama et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4915878 | Fabry et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4925561 | Ishii et al. | May 1990 | A |
4954249 | Gero et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
5002666 | Matsumoto et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5049326 | Matsumoto et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5066400 | Rocklitz et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5080790 | Widmann | Jan 1992 | A |
5089202 | Lippold | Feb 1992 | A |
5120296 | Yamaguchi et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5128039 | Gabrielson | Jul 1992 | A |
5240540 | Matsumoto et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5262899 | Iizuka | Nov 1993 | A |
5274413 | Nomura et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5290447 | Lippold | Mar 1994 | A |
5346519 | Williams | Sep 1994 | A |
5419796 | Miller | May 1995 | A |
5435870 | Takagaki et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5487224 | Gabalda et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5522909 | Haggard et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5562825 | Yamada et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5591329 | Davidson | Jan 1997 | A |
5613992 | Engel | Mar 1997 | A |
5766289 | Haggard | Jun 1998 | A |
5772883 | Rothman et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
D396098 | Gillingham | Jul 1998 | S |
5792247 | Gillingham et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
D398046 | Gillingham | Sep 1998 | S |
5804014 | Kahler | Sep 1998 | A |
5804073 | Horst | Sep 1998 | A |
D399944 | Gillingham | Oct 1998 | S |
5820646 | Gillingham et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5851250 | Sugie et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5871641 | Davidson | Feb 1999 | A |
5882288 | Paul et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5888262 | Kahler | Mar 1999 | A |
5895574 | Friedmann et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5902364 | Toker et al. | May 1999 | A |
5904793 | Gorman et al. | May 1999 | A |
5970609 | Shioda | Oct 1999 | A |
5987399 | Wegerich et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6039778 | Coulonvaux | Mar 2000 | A |
6048298 | Paul et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
D428128 | Gillingham | Jul 2000 | S |
6089761 | Sakurai et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6179890 | Ramos | Jan 2001 | B1 |
D437401 | Ramos | Feb 2001 | S |
6190432 | Gieseke et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6202038 | Wegerich et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6210469 | Tokar | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6235195 | Tokar | May 2001 | B1 |
6238561 | Liu et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6348084 | Gieseke | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6348085 | Tokar | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6350291 | Gieseke | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6350296 | Warner | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6402800 | Rey | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6433748 | Ekelund et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6517598 | Anderson | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6544310 | Badeau et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6554503 | Imanari et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6582490 | Miller et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6598749 | Paul et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6610117 | Gieseke et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6610126 | Xu | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6620223 | Bloomer | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6673136 | Gillingham et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6685833 | Lippold | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6743270 | Oda et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6746518 | Gieseke et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6783565 | Gieseke et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6790397 | Richerson et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6846342 | Mertz et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6848435 | Kitamura et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6893282 | Schadhauser | May 2005 | B2 |
6946012 | Miller | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6953124 | Winter et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6955775 | Chung et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6966940 | Krisko et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6986842 | Bortnik et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7070642 | Scott et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7122068 | Tate et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7149153 | Meylan | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7166216 | Woodard et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7213595 | Capon et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7235115 | Duffy | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7258719 | Miller et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7270693 | Chung et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7311747 | Adamek et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7329326 | Wagner et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7396375 | Nepsund | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7396376 | Schrage et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7425227 | Hutchison et al. | Sep 2008 | B1 |
7438812 | Denton et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7488365 | Golden et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7556663 | Niakan | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7588619 | Chilton | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7622063 | Brandner et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7625419 | Nelson et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7661540 | Choi | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7754041 | Brandner et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7927393 | Sanami | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7959702 | Rocklitz et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7997425 | Golden et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8034145 | Bohers et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8042694 | Driml et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8226786 | Risch et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8241384 | Murphy et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8268053 | Risch et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8277532 | Osendorf et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8292983 | Reichter et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8361183 | Rocklitz et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8397920 | Moy et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8409316 | Nelson et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8460442 | Wagner et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8496723 | Osendorf et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8512499 | Golden et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8545589 | Rocklitz | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8673196 | Treier et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8685128 | Murphy et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8702830 | Muter | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8734557 | Rocklitz et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8814972 | Waibel et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8961722 | Murphy et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
9084957 | Rocklitz | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9103470 | Cik | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9433884 | Rocklitz et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9517430 | Rocklitz et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9808752 | Moe et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9855519 | Rocklitz | Jan 2018 | B2 |
10058812 | Rocklitz | Aug 2018 | B2 |
10363513 | Moe | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10525397 | Rocklitz et al. | Jan 2020 | B2 |
10786774 | Rocklitz et al. | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10946313 | Rocklitz et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
11298645 | Rocklitz et al. | Apr 2022 | B2 |
11413563 | Rocklitz | Aug 2022 | B2 |
11612845 | Rocklitz | Mar 2023 | B2 |
20020046654 | Bloomer | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020060183 | Paul et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020108359 | Powell | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020174770 | Badeau et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030033952 | Tanner | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030037675 | Gillingham et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030056479 | LeMaster | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030075500 | Kleingünther et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030121845 | Wagner et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040060269 | Chung et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040060861 | Winter et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20050139544 | Choi | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050144916 | Adamek et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050166561 | Schrage | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050217226 | Sundet et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050223687 | Miller et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050252182 | Golden et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060005518 | Duffy et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060021926 | Woodard | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060042209 | Dallas et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060042210 | Dallas et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060091066 | Driml et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060091084 | Merritt | May 2006 | A1 |
20060096263 | Kahlbaugh | May 2006 | A1 |
20060117730 | Chung et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060151383 | Choi | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060163150 | Golden et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060246260 | Sundet et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060272305 | Morgan | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070039296 | Schrage et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070209343 | Cuvelier et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070251634 | Choi | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080022643 | Fox et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080209875 | Treier et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080216654 | Wagner et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080282890 | Rocklitz et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090102094 | Golden et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090127211 | Rocklitz | May 2009 | A1 |
20090188219 | Sanami et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090211696 | Moe et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090302390 | Van Dal et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100032365 | Moe | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100078379 | Rocklitz | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100187171 | Gupta | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20110186504 | Rocklitz | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110277431 | Rocklitz et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120196733 | Moe et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120312167 | Wagner et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130228077 | Rocklitz et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20140182251 | Rocklitz | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140325946 | Rocklitz et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150375142 | Rocklitz | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20170028341 | Rocklitz et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170216758 | Rocklitz et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20180214797 | Rocklitz | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20190054412 | Rocklitz | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20200139290 | Rocklitz et al. | May 2020 | A1 |
20210077939 | Rocklitz et al. | Mar 2021 | A1 |
20210268408 | Rocklitz | Sep 2021 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2008210304 | Sep 2013 | AU |
2008268271 | Mar 2014 | AU |
557255 | May 1958 | CA |
2676825 | Apr 2015 | CA |
1040239 | Jun 1989 | CN |
1080012 | Dec 1993 | CN |
1100776 | Mar 1995 | CN |
1220617 | Jun 1996 | CN |
1079275 | Feb 2002 | CN |
1502739 | Jun 2004 | CN |
1615172 | May 2005 | CN |
1668363 | Sep 2005 | CN |
1678383 | Oct 2005 | CN |
1902384 | Jan 2007 | CN |
1325142 | Jul 2007 | CN |
101189056 | May 2008 | CN |
101626820 | Jul 2012 | CN |
102743930 | Oct 2012 | CN |
102743931 | Oct 2012 | CN |
102743937 | Oct 2012 | CN |
101932372 | Sep 2015 | CN |
102438723 | Dec 2015 | CN |
105148614 | Dec 2015 | CN |
102781546 | Jan 2016 | CN |
1407908 | Jan 1969 | DE |
2117672 | Oct 1971 | DE |
3815145 | Oct 1989 | DE |
8910110 | Feb 1990 | DE |
4126126 | Feb 1993 | DE |
19735993 | Feb 1999 | DE |
10113077 | Apr 2002 | DE |
69722933 | May 2004 | DE |
60033469 | Oct 2007 | DE |
102008029480 | Dec 2009 | DE |
0504038 | Sep 1992 | EP |
0522692 | Jan 1993 | EP |
0630672 | Dec 1994 | EP |
0783914 | Jul 1997 | EP |
1249261 | Oct 2002 | EP |
1410832 | Apr 2004 | EP |
1343573 | Mar 2005 | EP |
1595590 | Nov 2005 | EP |
1681087 | Jul 2006 | EP |
1785604 | May 2007 | EP |
2170488 | Apr 2010 | EP |
2268380 | Jan 2011 | EP |
2514504 | Oct 2012 | EP |
2117672 | Jan 2013 | EP |
2829310 | Jan 2015 | EP |
3293833 | Mar 2018 | EP |
2391753 | Nov 2020 | EP |
1477095 | Apr 1967 | FR |
2427123 | Dec 1979 | FR |
1336841 | Nov 1973 | GB |
2395537 | Apr 2006 | GB |
1973004670 | Feb 1973 | JP |
S5270107 | Jun 1977 | JP |
1984006916 | Jan 1984 | JP |
5982919 | May 1984 | JP |
6071018 | Apr 1985 | JP |
61011921 | Jan 1986 | JP |
61178009 | Aug 1986 | JP |
61200116 | Dec 1986 | JP |
S64085109 | Mar 1989 | JP |
01128811 | May 1989 | JP |
1-163408 | Nov 1989 | JP |
01163410 | Nov 1989 | JP |
2-25009 | Feb 1990 | JP |
2-129231 | Oct 1990 | JP |
3229230 | Oct 1991 | JP |
H06064709 | Mar 1994 | JP |
06327910 | Nov 1994 | JP |
3006350 | Jan 1995 | JP |
8238413 | Sep 1996 | JP |
08309138 | Nov 1996 | JP |
H08309138 | Nov 1996 | JP |
H09170199 | Jun 1997 | JP |
H09170200 | Jun 1997 | JP |
1997507156 | Jul 1997 | JP |
2000509324 | Jul 2000 | JP |
2002113798 | Apr 2002 | JP |
2002303122 | Oct 2002 | JP |
2002537103 | Nov 2002 | JP |
2002542417 | Dec 2002 | JP |
2003013724 | Jan 2003 | JP |
2003166446 | Jun 2003 | JP |
2004089982 | Mar 2004 | JP |
2004520156 | Jul 2004 | JP |
2005511269 | Apr 2005 | JP |
2005532163 | Oct 2005 | JP |
2007515291 | Jun 2007 | JP |
2011511705 | Apr 2011 | JP |
5555493 | Jun 2014 | JP |
5711230 | Feb 2015 | JP |
5728525 | Apr 2015 | JP |
2015091584 | May 2015 | JP |
5757868 | Jun 2015 | JP |
2015131299 | Jul 2015 | JP |
8400014 | Jan 1984 | WO |
8705827 | Oct 1987 | WO |
89010781 | Nov 1989 | WO |
8912137 | Dec 1989 | WO |
9302769 | Feb 1993 | WO |
9517943 | Jul 1995 | WO |
9744128 | Nov 1997 | WO |
97040918 | Nov 1997 | WO |
9908771 | Feb 1999 | WO |
2000050153 | Aug 2000 | WO |
2002049741 | Jun 2002 | WO |
2003033952 | Apr 2003 | WO |
2003047722 | Jun 2003 | WO |
2004007054 | Jan 2004 | WO |
2004039476 | May 2004 | WO |
2004082795 | Sep 2004 | WO |
2005077487 | Aug 2005 | WO |
2005082484 | Sep 2005 | WO |
2005123222 | Dec 2005 | WO |
2006014941 | Feb 2006 | WO |
2006017790 | Feb 2006 | WO |
2006076456 | Jul 2006 | WO |
2006076479 | Jul 2006 | WO |
2006132717 | Dec 2006 | WO |
2007056589 | May 2007 | WO |
2007133635 | Nov 2007 | WO |
2008095196 | Aug 2008 | WO |
2009003119 | Dec 2008 | WO |
2009100067 | Aug 2009 | WO |
2010011910 | Jan 2010 | WO |
2011017352 | Feb 2011 | WO |
2011091432 | Jul 2011 | WO |
2012067729 | May 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“Final Office Action,” for U.S. Appl. No. 17/031,551, mailed Aug. 19, 2022 (10 pages). |
“Non Final Office Action,” for U.S. Appl. No. 17/031,551, mailed on Apr. 14, 2022 (63 pages). |
“Response to Non-Final Rejection,” mailed on Apr. 14, 2022 for U.S. Appl. No. 17/031,551, submitted via EFS-Web on Jul. 14, 2022, 8 pages. |
“Constant,” “Uniform,” Excerpts from Random House Unabridged Dictionary regarding the terms “constant”/“uniform,” Random House Unabridged Dictionary, second Edition, 1993 (3 pages). |
“Examiner's Pre-Review Report,” for Japanese Patent Application No. 2016- 233484 mailed Apr. 19, 2019 (10 pages) with English Summary. |
File History for U.S. Appl. No. 14/040,929 downloaded Jul. 16, 2020 (776 pages). |
File History for U.S. Appl. No. 14/198,246 downloaded Jul. 16, 2020 (414 pages). |
File History for U.S. Appl. No. 15/221,824 downloaded Jul. 16, 2020 (762 pages). |
File History for U.S. Appl. No. 13/013,631 downloaded Jul. 28, 2020 (1077 pages). |
File History for U.S. Appl. No. 12/322,616 downloaded Jul. 28, 2020 (698 pages). |
File History for U.S. Appl. No. 13/388,956 downloaded Jul. 28, 2020 (1013 pages). |
File History for European Patent Application No. 11703321.7 downloaded Jul. 29, 2020 (2534 pages). |
File History for European Patent Application No. 09790799.2 downloaded Jul. 31, 2020 (2187 pages). |
File History for European Patent Application No. 18164621.7 downloaded Jun. 21, 2022 (541 pages). |
File History for U.S. Appl. No. 16/735,412 downloaded May 4, 2022 (322 pages). |
File History for European Patent Application No. 12163091.7 downloaded Jun. 21, 2022 (540 pages). |
File History for European Patent Application No. 12163098.2 downloaded Jun. 21, 2022 (526 pages). |
File History for European Patent Application No. 12163105.5 downloaded Jun. 21, 2022 (554 pages). |
File History for European Patent Application No. 14166293.2 downloaded Jun. 21, 2022 (268 pages). |
File History for European Patent Application No. 08781029.7 downloaded Jun. 21, 2022 (720 pages). |
File History for European Patent Application No. 08714184.2 downloaded Jun. 21, 2022 (511 pages). |
File History for European Patent Application No. 13/110,742 downloaded Jun. 21, 2022 (349 pages). |
File History for U.S. Appl. No. 13/744,200 downloaded Jun. 21, 2022 (290 pages). |
File History for U.S. Appl. No. 15/372,944 downloaded Jun. 21, 2022 (597 pages). |
File History for European Patent Application No. 21171799.6 downloaded Jun. 21, 2022 (264 pages). |
File History for European Patent Application No. 10807046.7 downloaded Jun. 21, 2022 (499 pages). |
File History for European Patent Application No. 09708023.8 downloaded Jun. 21, 2022 (516 pages). |
File History for U.S. Appl. No. 17/031,551 downloaded Jun. 22, 2022 (295 pages). |
File History for U.S. Appl. No. 12/012,785 downloaded Jun. 22, 2022 (323 pages). |
File History for U.S. Appl. No. 12/215,718 downloaded Jun. 22, 2022 (463 pages). |
File History for U.S. Appl. No. 14/708,993 downloaded Jun. 22, 2022 (366 pages). |
File History for U.S. Appl. No. 15/859,021 downloaded Jun. 22, 2022 (504 pages). |
File History for U.S. Appl. No. 16/113,807 downloaded Jun. 22, 2022 (634 pages). |
File History for U.S. Appl. No. 17/201,623 downloaded Jun. 22, 2022 (991 pages). |
File History for U.S. Appl. No. 12/508,944 downloaded Jun. 22, 2022 (591 pages). |
“Final Rejection Action,” for Chinese Patent Application No. 201710616416.X mailed Feb. 25, 2020 (12 pages) with English Translation. |
“First Examination Report,” for Indian Patent Application No. 2038/KOLNP/2012 mailed Jul. 27, 2018 (6 pages). |
“First Examination Report,” for Indian Patent Application No. 486/KOLNP/2012 dated Jun. 27, 2018 (9 pages). |
“First Office Action,” for Chinese Patent Application No. 201710616416.X mailed Apr. 24, 2019 (15 pages) with English Translation. |
“First Office Action,” for Japanese Patent Application No. 2017-203639 mailed Feb. 4, 2019 (6 pages) with English Summary. |
“Formed by,” Exerpts from Random House Unabridged Dictionary regarding the terms “formed by,” emphasis added, Random House Unabridged Dictionary, Second Edition, 1993 (3 pages). |
“Fourth Office Action,” for Chinese Patent Application No. 201510896382.5 mailed Jan. 11, 2019 (18 pages) with English Translation. |
“Hearing Notice,” for Indian Patent Application No. 2038/KOLNP/2012 mailed Sep. 24, 2021 (2 pages). |
“Notice of Allowance,” for Chinese Patent Application No. 2009801039650, mailed Jun. 4, 2015 (3 pages) including English translation. |
“Notice of Allowance,” for Chinese Patent Application No. 201210181182.8, mailed Jun. 4, 2015 (3 pages) with English translation. |
“Office Action,” for Brazilian Patent Application No. PI0915931-2 mailed Jun. 4, 2019 (5 pages) English Translation Only. |
“Office Action,” for Brazilian Patent Application No. PI0915931-2 mailed Oct. 1, 2019 (14 pages) with English Translation. |
“Office Action,” for Japanese Patent Application No. 2015-043876 dated Nov. 13, 2018 (2 pages), English translation. |
“Office Action,” for Japanese Patent Application No. 2015-043876 mailed Jun. 26, 2018 (15 pages) with English translation. |
“Office Action,” for Japanese Patent Application No. 2016-233484 mailed Mar. 23, 2020 (17 pages) with English Translation. |
“Office Action,” for Japanese Patent Application No. 2016-233484 mailed May 7, 2018 (10 pages) with English translation. |
“Second Office Action,” for Chinese Patent Application No. 201710616416.X mailed Sep. 27, 2019 (11 pages) with English Translation. |
“Summons to attend oral proceedings pursuant to Rule 115(1) EPC,” for EP Opposition Application No. 11703321.1 mailed Dec. 22, 2020 (7 pages). |
“Technical Examination Report,” for Brazilian Patent Application No. 1120120185209 mailed Jan. 29, 2019 (2 pages) English Translation Only. |
“Technical Examination Report,” for Brazilian Patent Application No. PI 0907653-0 mailed Dec. 11, 2018 (6 pages) English Translation only. |
“Third Office Action,” for Chinese Patent Application No. 201510896382.5 mailed Jul. 12, 2018 (20 pages) with English translation. |
Chinese Notice of Allowance received for Chinese Application No. 200880006683.4, mailed Mar. 20, 2012, (4 pages) Including English translation. |
CN Decision by Rexam Board for Chinese Patent Application No. 200980131774.5, mailed Apr. 21, 2017 (15 pages) no English translation available. |
Decision of Rejection for Japanese Patent Application No. 2015-043876 mailed Jun. 20, 2017 (5 pages) with English translation. |
Examination Report for Australian Patent Application No. 2016202520 mailed Nov. 21, 2016 (2 pages). |
Examiner's Pre-Review Report for Japanese Patent Application No. 2010545266, mailed Jan. 20, 2014 (4 pages). |
Examiner's Report for Canadian Application No. 2676825, mailed Sep. 11, 2013, 3 pages. |
Examiner's Report for Canadian Patent Application No. 2691867, mailed on Jan. 30, 2015 (3 pages). |
Figures 1-6 from Japanese Patent JP2-129231, dated Oct. 2002, 3 pages. |
Final Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201510507854.3 mailed Oct. 9, 2017 (14 pages) with English translation. |
Final Office Action for Japanese Patent Application No. 2014-114346, mailed Aug. 5, 2016 (3 pages). |
Final Office Action for Japanese Patent Application No. 2015-043876 mailed Nov. 8, 2016 (9 pages) with English translation. |
Final Office Action for Japanese Patent Application No. 2015-077921 mailed Feb. 17, 2017 (5 pages) with English summary. |
Final Office Action for Japanese Patent Application No. 2015-077921 mailed Jun. 20, 2017 (8 pages) with English translation. |
Final Rejection for Chinese Application No. 200980103965.0, mailed May 14, 2013 (14 pages) including English translation. |
Final Rejection for Chinese Patent Application No. 201080037254.0, mailed Mar. 30, 2015 (15 pages) with English translation. |
Final Rejection for Japanese Patent Application No. 2010-545266 mailed Jul. 8, 2013 (4 pages) with English Summary. |
Final Rejection for Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-232560 mailed Jan. 5, 2016 (3 pages) with English Summary. |
Final Rejection for Japanese Patent Application No. 2010-515132 mailed Dec. 21, 2012 (4 pages) with English Summary. |
First Chinese Office Action Received First Office Action for Chinese Application No. 200880006683.4, mailed May 31, 2011, Including English translation, 7 pages. |
First Examination Report for Australian Patent Application No. 2011207507, mailed Dec. 1, 2015 (3 pages). |
First Examination Report for India Patent Application No. 283/KOLNP/2010, mailed Dec. 30, 2014 (3 pages). |
First Examination Report for India Patent Application No. 3070/KOLNP/2009, mailed Aug. 7, 2014 (2 pages). |
First Examination Report for Indian Patent Application No. 3243/kolnp/2010, mailed Oct. 12, 2015 (2 pages). |
First Examiner Report for Australian Patent Application No. 2014201109, mailed Jul. 20, 2015 (3 pages). |
First Examiner Report from Australian Application No. 2008268271, mailed Feb. 24, 2012, 2 pages. |
First Examiner's Report for Australian Patent Application No. 2013270543 mailed Apr. 23, 2015 (3 pages). |
First Office Action for Application Serial No. 200980131774.5, dated Mar. 20, 2013, with English translation (14 pages). |
First Office Action for Chinese Application No. 200880104082.7, mailed Aug. 9, 2013 (7 pages) with English translation. |
First Office Action for Chinese Application No. 200980103965.0, mailed Jul. 20, 2012, (pp. 1-18) Including English translation. |
First Office Action for Chinese Application No. 201080037254.0, mailed Oct. 29, 2013, with English translation (20 pages). |
First Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201180011588.5, (with English translation) mailed Mar. 4, 2014 (30 pages). |
First Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 20120181182.8, mailed Feb. 21, 2014 (16 pages) with English translation. |
First Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201210180467.X, mailed Jan. 28, 2014 (10 pages) with English translation. |
First Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201210181810.2 mailed Jan. 10, 2014 (8 pages) with English translation. |
First Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201510507854.3, mailed Jun. 28, 2016 (15 pages) with English translation. |
First Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201510828027.4 mailed Dec. 16, 2016 (14 pages) with English Translation. |
First Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201510896382.5 mailed Mar. 27, 2017 (17 pages). |
First Office Action for Japanese Patent Application No. 2013089604, mailed Jan. 27, 2014 (4 pages) with English translation. |
First Office Action for Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-232560, mailed Dec. 8, 2014 (5 pages) with English translation. |
First Office Action for Japanese Patent Application No. 2014114346, mailed Jul. 31, 2015 (10 pages) with English Summary. |
First Office Action for Japanese Patent Application No. 2015-077921, mailed Jul. 4, 2016 (6 pages) with English Translation. |
First Office Action from JP Application No. 2008554447, mailed Dec. 14, 2012, (pp. 1-7) Including English translation. |
First Office Action from JP Application No. 2009-548495, mailed Mar. 11, 2013, (7 pgs.) with English Summary. |
First Office Action Received for Australian Application No. 2008210304, mailed Nov. 23, 2011 (2 pages). |
Fourth Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 200980131774.5, mailed Apr. 29, 2015 (14 pages) with English translation. |
Fourth Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201210180467.X, mailed Dec. 29, 2015 (10 pages) with English translation. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2008/068394, mailed Jan. 5, 2010 (8 pages). |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2009/032965 mailed Aug. 19, 2010 (9 pages). |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability from International Application No. PCT/US2008/068394, mailed Jan. 14, 2010 (9 pages). |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability from International Application No. PCT/US2010/044286, mailed Feb. 16, 2012, 7 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2009/032965, mailed May 18, 2009 (13 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Application No. PCT/US2008/052961, mailed Jun. 11, 2008 (13 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Application No. PCT/US2008/068394, mailed Oct. 7, 2008, (11 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Application No. PCT/US2010/044286, mailed Apr. 14, 2011, 10 pages. |
Invitation to Pay Additional Fees, received in corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2009/051670, 12 pages, dated Oct. 14, 2009. |
Japanese office action from Japanese Application No. 2010-515132, mailed May 2, 2012, (pp. 1-14) Including English translation. |
Non Final Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201210181810.2, mailed on Feb. 10, 2015 (13 pages) with English translation. |
Non-Final Office Action for Japanese Application No. 2011-520223, mailed Jun. 4, 2013, with English translation (5 pages). |
Non-Final Office Action for Japanese Patent Application No. 2014-263546, mailed Nov. 10, 2015 (5 pages) with English Summary. |
Notice of Allowance for Chinese Patent Application No. 201210181810.2, mailed Aug. 19, 2015 (3 pages with English translation). |
Notice of Opposition for European Patent Application No. 09790799.2 on behalf of MAHLE International GmbH, dated Aug. 23, 2017 (15 pages) with English translation. |
Notice of Opposition for European Patent Application No. 09790799.2 on behalf of MANN+HUMMEL International Gmbh & Co. KG, dated Aug. 22, 2017 (57 pages) with English translation. |
Notice of Opposition for European Patent Application No. 11703321.7 on behalf of MAHLE International GmbH, mailed Feb. 1, 2019 (33 pages). |
Notification for Patent Reexamination for Chinese Patent Application No. 200980131774.5 mailed Nov. 18, 2016 (16 pages) with English translation. |
Notification for Patent Reexamination for Chinese Patent Application No. 201080037254.0, mailed Oct. 26, 2015 (9 pages) with English translation. |
Office Action by the Appeal Examiner for Japanese Patent Application No. 2010- 545266, mailed Dec. 11, 2015 (3 pages) with English Summary. |
Office Action for Chinese Application No. 200880104082.7, mailed on Feb. 12, 2015 (6 pages) with English Translation. |
Office Action for Japanese Application No. 2012-523711, with English translation, mailed Jul. 1, 2014 (5 pages). |
Office Action for Japanese Patent Application No. 2014114346, mailed Aug. 4, 2017 (23 pages) with English translation. |
Office Action for Japanese Patent Application No. 2015-043876 mailed Mar. 1, 2016 (6 pages) with English translation. |
Office Action for Japanese Patent Application No. 2016-233484 mailed Sep. 4, 2017 (7 pages) with English translation. |
Office Action for JP Application No. 2010-545266, mailed Jun. 20, 2014 (9 pages). |
Office Action for Mexican Patent Application No. MX/a/2012/001455 mailed Apr. 7, 2016 (2 pages), translation only. |
Office Action for Mexican Patent Application No. MX/a/2012/001455 mailed May 4, 2017 (3 pages), translation only. |
Office Action for Mexican Patent Application No. MX/a/2012/001455 received by the associate Dec. 7, 2016 (2 pages), translation only. |
Office Action for Mexican Patent Application No. MX/a/2012/001455 received by the associate Nov. 14, 2017 (5 pages) with English summary. |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Application No. PCT/US2009/051670, mailed Feb. 9, 2010, 26 pages. |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Application No. PCT/US2011/022446, mailed Apr. 5, 2011, 15 pages. |
PCT Notification Concerning Transmittal of International Preliminary Report on from International Application No. PCT/US2011/022446, mailed Aug. 9, 2012, 12 pages. |
PCT Notification Concerning Transmittal of International Preliminary Report on Patentability from International Application No. PCT/US2009/051670, mailed Feb. 3, 2011, 15 pages. |
Reconsideration Report for Japanese Patent Application No. 2015-043876 mailed Dec. 12, 2017 (2 pages), English translation. |
Response to Examiner's Report for Canadian Patent Application No. 2,691,867, mailed and filed with the CIPO Jul. 30, 2015 (86 pages). |
Response to First Office Action from Japanese Application No. 2010-515132, submitted Sep. 19, 2012, (11 pages) Including English Translation of claim amendments. |
Response to First Examination Report for Indian Patent Application No. 283/KOLNP/2010, filed with the IPO Dec. 28, 2015 (54 pages). |
Second Examiner's Report for Canadian Patent Application No. 2691867, mailed on Nov. 2, 2015 (3 pages). |
Second Non-Final Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201180011588.5, mailed Dec. 25, 2014 (9 pages) with English translation. |
Second Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 200880104082.7, mailed Mar. 11, 2014 (49 pages) with English translation. |
Second Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 2009801039650, mailed Oct. 29, 2014 (6 pages) including English translation. |
Second Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 200980131774.5, mailed Jan. 24, 2014 (12 pages) including English translation. |
Second Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201080037254.0, mailed Nov. 15, 2014 (15 pages) with English translation. |
Second Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201210180467.X, mailed Nov. 2, 2014 (7 pages) with English translation. |
Second Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201210181182.8, mailed Dec. 9, 2014 (6 pages) with English translation. |
Second Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201510507854.3 mailed Feb. 13, 2017 (8 pages) with English translation. |
Second Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201510828027.4 mailed Sep. 11, 2017 (15 pages) with English Translation. |
Second Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201510896382.5 mailed Nov. 29, 2017 (14 pages) with English translation. |
Second Office Action for Japanese Patent Application No. 2010-545266, mailed on May 15, 2015 (10 pages) with English Translation. |
Second Office Action for Mexican Patent Application No. MX/a/2011/000965, mailed Nov. 6, 2014 (2 pages). |
Third Non-Final Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201180011588.5, mailed on Jun. 15, 2015 (7 pages) with English translation. |
Third Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 200980131774.5, mailed Jan. 16, 2015 (15 pages) with English translation. |
Third Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201210180467.X, mailed Jul. 6, 2015 (8 pages) with English translation. |
Third Office Action for Mexican Patent Application No. MX/a/2011/000965, mailed Apr. 27, 2014 (2 pages). |
Translation of Final Rejection for Japanese Patent Application No. 2011520223, mailed Sep. 2, 2014, 2 pages. |
Translation of Mexican Office Action Received, Mexican Application No. MX/a/2009/008242, mailed Jun. 8, 2012, 1 page. |
Translation of Office Action for Mexican Application No. MX/a/2010/008530, mailed Jul. 10, 2014 (3 pages). |
Translation of Office Action for Mexican Patent Application No. MX/2010/008530, mailed on Jan. 30, 2015 (3 pages). |
Translation of Office Action for Mexican Patent Application No. MX/a/2010/008530, mailed Dec. 3, 2013 (2 pages). |
Translation of Office Action for Mexico Application No. MX/a/2010/008530, mailed May 28, 2013 (3 pages). |
Translation of Office Action for Mexico Patent Application No. MX/a/2011/000965, mailed Apr. 28, 2015 (2 pages). |
Translation of Office Action from Mexican Application No. MX/a/2009/014134 mailed Apr. 19, 2012 (3 pages). |
Type 101 Automatic Corrugator, Solent Technology Deep Pleating Equipment, Dec. 23, 2009. |
Type 102 Computerized Pleating System, Solent Technology Deep Pleating Equipment, Dec. 23, 2009. |
Type 103 Box Pleater, Solent Technology Deep Pleating Equipment, Dec. 23, 2009. |
Type 104 Blade Pleater, Solent Technology Deep Pleating Equipment, Dec. 23, 2009. |
Type 106 Dedicated Pleating System, Solent Technology Deep Pleating Equipment, Dec. 23, 2009. |
Type 202 Computerized Pleating System, Solent Technology Deep Pleating Equipment, Dec. 23, 2009. |
Hutten, Irwin “Strength and Tensile Properties,” Testing of Nonwoven Filter Media, Handbook of Non-Woven Filter Media, Elsevier Science & Technology Books, Mar. 2007, pp. 267-271 (7 pages). |
Muchorski, D., et al. “Tensile properties of paper and paperboard (using constant rate of elongation apparatus),” Revision of TAPPI Standard test method T 494, Jun. 13, 2006 (28 pages). |
“Non-Final Office Action,” for U.S. Appl. No. 17/201,623 mailed Feb. 14, 2023 (97 pages). |
“Notice of Allowance,” for U.S. Appl. No. 17/031,551, mailed Nov. 30, 2022 (7 pages. |
“Response to Final Rejection,” mailed Aug. 19, 2022 along with accompanying e-Terminal Disclaimer for U.S. Appl. No. 17/031,551, submitted via EFS-Web on Nov. 15, 2022, 5 pages. |
“Response to Non Final Office Action,” for U.S. Appl. No. 17/201,623, filed May 15, 2023 (8 pages). |
“Final Office Action,” for U.S. Appl. No. 17/201,623 mailed Jul. 27, 2023 (16 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220314156 A1 | Oct 2022 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60937162 | Jun 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16735412 | Jan 2020 | US |
Child | 17717970 | US | |
Parent | 15221824 | Jul 2016 | US |
Child | 16735412 | US | |
Parent | 14040929 | Sep 2013 | US |
Child | 15221824 | US | |
Parent | 12215718 | Jun 2008 | US |
Child | 14040929 | US |