The presently disclosed subject matter relates to fin deployment systems, in particular for projectiles.
References considered to be relevant as background to the presently disclosed subject matter are listed below:
Acknowledgement of the above references herein is not to be inferred as meaning that these are in any way relevant to the patentability of the presently disclosed subject matter.
Cannon-fired projectiles are known, in which a cartridge case expels the projectile at high acceleration. In at least some cases, wrap-around fins are provided for such projectiles, and indeed other projectiles not necessarily cannon-launched, and many deployment systems are also known for such wrap-around fins.
According to an aspect of the presently disclosed subject matter there is provided a fin deployment system for a projectile, the fin deployment system defining a longitudinal axis and comprising:
Herein, the terms “fins” are interchangeably used with the terms “vanes”.
In at least some examples, the fin deployment system comprises an outer casing, and an inner support bracket internally mounted to outer casing, the fin assemblies being pivotably mounted to the outer casing about the respective deployment axes, and the actuation assembly being mounted to the inner support bracket.
For example, the inner support bracket comprises a plurality of struts or arms radially projecting from the longitudinal axis to an inner surface of the outer casing.
For example, the actuation assembly is configured for selectively applying the actuating force to the first mechanical stop arrangement along an axial direction parallel to the longitudinal axis, to thereby unlock the actuator plate from the first pivot position.
For example, the actuation assembly comprises an actuation piston, axially displaceable with respect to the inner support bracket from a first axial position to a second axial position. For example, the actuation assembly comprises a pyrotechnic component operable for selectively displacing the actuation piston to the second axial position when fired. For example, the first mechanical stop arrangement comprises a pin support bracket carrying at least one pin and mounted with respect to the inner support bracket to prevent relative rotation of the pin support bracket about the longitudinal axis, the at least one pin being engaged in a complementary hole provided in the actuator plate when the actuator plate is in the first pivot position to thereby lock the actuator plate with respect to the inner support bracket in the first pivot position, the pin support bracket being selectively axially displaceable responsive to actuation of the actuation piston to disengage the at least one pin from the complementary hole and to thereby unlock the actuator plate from the first pivot position. For example, the at least one pin also passes through a complementary axial opening in the inner support bracket to thereby prevent relative rotation of the pin support bracket about the longitudinal axis. For example, the pin support bracket is affixed to one end of the actuation piston, and wherein in said first axial position the at least one pin is engaged in the complementary hole, and wherein in said second axial position, the at least one pin is disengaged from the complementary hole.
For example, the second mechanical stop arrangement is configured for locking the fin assemblies in the respective deployed positions responsive to the actuator plate pivoting from the first pivot position to the second pivot position, by mechanically locking the actuator plate in the second pivot position. For example, the second mechanical stop arrangement comprises at least one first tooth provided on the actuator plate in general overlying abutting relationship with at least one second tooth provided on the inner support bracket, each said first tooth and said second tooth having a respective moderate slope and a respective steep slope, wherein in said first pivot position the respective moderate slopes are in abutting contact, permitting relative rotation between the actuator plate and the inner support bracket about the longitudinal axis to the second pivot position, and wherein in said second pivot position, the respective steep slopes of the first tooth and the second tooth are in abutting contact, preventing relative rotation between the actuator plate and the inner support bracket from the second pivot position to the first pivot position. For example, the fin deployment system further comprises a biasing spring for biasing the actuator plate towards the inner support bracket. For example, the biasing spring has a first axial end abutting a stop provided on the actuation assembly, and a second axial end abutting the actuator plate. For example, the biasing spring further biases the respective steep slopes of the first tooth and the second tooth into abutting contact in said second pivot position.
For example, the actuation plate is pivotably mounted with respect to the inner support bracket.
For example, the actuator plate comprises a plurality of radial through-slots corresponding to the plurality of fin assemblies, each fin assembly comprising an actuating arm rigidly mounted to a root of the respective fin and comprising an axial pin or rod, spaced from the fin root, the axial pin or rod being received in the respective said through-slot and radially movable with respect to the respective slot concurrently with pivoting of the actuator plate from the first pivot position to the second pivot position to thereby concurrently pivot the respective fin from the stowed position to the deployed position. For example, the actuator plate is axially movable concurrent with pivoting of the actuator plate from the first pivot position to the second pivot position
For example, the fin deployment system further comprise a torque applicator configured for applying a driving torque to at least one of the actuator plate and the plurality of fin assemblies, to thereby pivot the actuator plate from the first pivot position to the second pivot position, responsive to the actuator plate being unlocked from the first pivot position.
For example, the torque applicator comprises at least one of a torsion bar or torsion spring at each fin hinge and pre-stressed or otherwise biased to apply the driving torque to the respective fin assembly, to thereby pivot the respective fin to the deployed position, and concurrently pivot the actuator plate from the first pivot position to the second pivot position, responsive to the actuator plate being unlocked from the first pivot position. For example, when the torque applicator is twisted, it exerts a torque in the opposite direction to the twist, proportional to the twist angle.
Additionally or alternatively, the torque applicator comprises at least one of a torsion bar or torsion spring coupled to the actuator plate, and pre-stressed or otherwise biased to apply the driving torque to the actuator plate, to thereby pivot the actuator plate from the first pivot position to the second pivot position, responsive to the actuator plate being unlocked from the first pivot position, and concurrently pivot the fins to the respective deployed positions.
For example, the fins are wrap-around fins having a first side and a second side, wherein in the respective stowed configuration the respective fins are in wrapped configuration, wherein said first sides of the fins are in overlying relationship with the outer casing, and wherein in said deployed configuration, the fins project generally radially with respect to the longitudinal axis.
For example, the deployment axes are parallel to, and radially spaced from, said longitudinal axis.
For example, each fin comprises an elongate curved body. Alternatively, the fin body can be substantially flat, at least when deployed.
For example, in the stowed position, the fins are cylindrically disposed over the outer casing to provide a cylindrical body having a diameter of 120 mm or about 120 mm.
According to this aspect of the presently disclosed subject matter there is also provided a projectile, comprising at least one fin deployment system as defined herein according to this aspect of the presently disclosed subject matter. For example, the projectile is configured for being cannon-launched. For example, the projectile is a 120 mm gun munition.
For example, one said fin deployment system is located at the center of gravity of the projectile.
Additionally or alternatively, one said fin deployment system is located in an aft portion of the projectile.
A feature of at least some examples of the fin deployment system is that the fins are reversibly locked in the stowed position using a relatively simple mechanical stop.
Another feature of at least some examples of the fin deployment system is that the fins are locked in the deployed position using a relatively simple mechanical stop.
Another feature of at least some examples of the fin deployment system is that the fins can be deployed from the stowed position to the deployed position in a relatively fast manner.
Another feature of at least some examples of the fin deployment system is that the fins can be deployed from the stowed position to the deployed position in a controlled manner.
In order to better understand the subject matter that is disclosed herein and to exemplify how it may be carried out in practice, examples will now be described, by way of non-limiting example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
Referring to
As will become clearer herein, the fin deployment system 100 operates to deploy a plurality of fins 650 from a stowed configuration (also referred to herein interchangeably as the stowed position), illustrated for example in
Referring to
In this example, the projectile is configured for travelling in a gaseous medium such as the atmosphere. However, in alternative variations of this example, the projectile is configured for travelling in a liquid medium such as the sea, for example, and can be in the form of a torpedo, for example.
The fin deployment system 100 defines a longitudinal axis LA, which in this and in other examples is co-axial with the longitudinal axis Z of the projectile 1.
Referring in particular to
While in this example, the fin deployment system 100 comprises four fin assemblies 600, in alternative variations of this example the fin deployment system can comprise two, three, or more than four fin assemblies. In any case, in this example and in other examples, the fin assemblies 600 are uniformly distributed circumferentially with respect to the outer casing 140.
Referring in particular to
Each fin 650 is pivotable from a stowed position SP (illustrated in
Referring in particular to
Referring in particular to
The actuator plate 200 is pivotable with respect to the inner support bracket 160 from a first pivot position P1 to a second pivot position P2 about the longitudinal axis LA. The actuator plate 200 has a general cruciform profile in top view, with four arms 220 (corresponding to the number of fin assemblies 600) projecting from a central portion 240, centered on the longitudinal axis LA. In alternative variations of this example, the actuator plat can have any suitable form, for example a disc or polygonal shape.
Each fin assembly 600 forms a kinematic pair with the actuator plate 200 such that pivoting of the actuator plate between the first pivot position P1 and the second pivot position P2, and the pivoting of each fin from the respective stowed position SP to the respective deployed position DP, are concurrent.
The kinematic pairs are formed by the mechanical coupling between the actuator plate 200 and each of the fin assemblies 600. In particular the actuator plate 200 comprises four radial through-slots 210 corresponding to the number of fin assemblies 600, that couple with the rods 665 to provide the coupling between the actuator plate 200 and the fin assemblies 600. Each slot 210 extends from the tip of the respective an 220 towards the longitudinal axis LA, and is sized to receive the rod 665 of the corresponding fin assembly 600, and to allow the rod 665 to radially slide in the slot 210, the rod 665 being in orthogonal relationship to the radial slot direction, as best seen in
Each rod 665 is thus received in the respective through-slot 210 and radially and reciprocally movable (with respect to the longitudinal axis LA) along the respective slot 210, concurrently with pivoting of the actuator plate 200 from the first pivot position P1 to the second pivot position P2, to thereby concurrently pivot the respective fin 650 from the stowed position SP to the deployed position DP. It is to be noted that the actuator plate 200 is also axially movable, i.e. along the longitudinal axis LA concurrent with pivoting of the actuator plate 200 from the first pivot position P1 to the second pivot position P2, as best seen in
Referring in particular to
In this example, the first mechanical stop arrangement 300 comprises a pin support bracket 320, carrying two pins 330 rigidly attached thereto and projecting in a direction towards the support bracket 160. In alternative variations of this example, the pin support bracket can instead carry one pin or more than two pins.
As can seen in
Referring also to
As can also be seen in
Referring in particular to
The actuation assembly 500 comprises a pyrotechnic component 560 operable for selectively displacing the actuation piston to the second axial A2 position when fired. For example, the pyrotechnic component 560 can comprise a squib provided at one end of the piston housing 550, and configured for providing, in response to a control command signal, a controlled explosion to thereby provide high pressure gases at one end of the piston 510, thereby driving the piston 510 axially to the second axial position A2.
The pin support bracket 320 is affixed to one end of the actuation piston 510, and thus when the piston 510 is in the first axial position A1, each pin 330 is engaged in the complementary hole 340, whereas when the piston 510 is in the second axial position A2, each pin 330 is disengaged from the complementary hole 340.
In alternative variations of this example, the actuation assembly can instead comprise a plurality of actuating pistons, and/or each actuating piston can be actuated in a different manner, for example pneumatically, hydraulically, or electrically, to thereby displace the pins 330 from engagement with to disengagement from, the actuation plate 200.
The second mechanical stop arrangement 400 is configured for locking the fin assemblies 600 in the respective deployed positions DP responsive to the actuator plate 200 pivoting from the first pivot position P1 to the second pivot position P2, in this example by mechanically locking the actuator plate 200 in the second pivot position P2.
Referring to
The fin deployment system 100, and in particular the second mechanical stop arrangement 400, further comprises a biasing spring 450 for biasing the actuator plate 200 towards the inner support bracket 160. The biasing spring 450 is in the form of a coil spring, coaxial with the longitudinal axis LA and located on an outside of the piston housing 550. The biasing spring 450 has a first axial end 452 abutting a first stop 552 provided on the actuation assembly 500 (in particular on the piston housing 550), and a second axial end 454 abutting the actuator plate 200 at a second stop 290. The biasing spring 450 is pre-stressed, so that is presses the actuation plate 200 towards the inner support bracket 160. Furthermore, in operation, the biasing spring 450 also biases the respective steep slopes 424, 444 of each pair of first teeth and the second teeth into abutting contact in the second pivot position P2—essentially, pivoting of the actuating plate 200 from the first pivot position P1 to the second pivot position P2 winds the biasing spring 450 about the longitudinal axis LA, and stores additional energy in the spring.
In this example, the system 100 further comprises a torque applicator 700, configured for applying a driving torque to at least one of the actuator plate 200 and the plurality of fin assemblies 600, to thereby pivot the actuator plate 200 from the first pivot position P1 to the second pivot position P2, responsive to the actuator plate 200 being unlocked from the first pivot position P1. In the illustrated example, applicator 700 applies the driving torque directly to the fin assemblies 600, to pivot the fin assemblies from the stowed position SP to the deployed positions DP, responsive to the actuator plate 200 being unlocked from the first pivot position P1. Concurrently, by being coupled to the actuator plate 200, the deployment of the fin assemblies 600 pivots the actuator plate 200 from the first pivot position P1 to the second pivot position, P2. In this example, the torque applicator 700 comprises a torsion bar 710 at each fin hinge 610, as best seen in
It is also apparent that at least in this example, since all the fin assemblies 600 are coupled to the same actuator plate 200, the fin assemblies 600 are effectively also coupled to one another via the actuator plate 200. Thus, the actuator plate 200 essentially synchronizes the deployment of the plurality of fin assemblies 600, which is another feature of at least this example of the fin deployment system. By being mechanically synchronized, the fin assemblies 600 will deploy in the same, synchronized, manner even if the torque applicator 700 is only partially effective and does not apply the same opening torque to all the fin assemblies 600.
In alternative variations of this example, the torque applicator 700 is instead configured for acting directly on the actuator plate 200, when this is unlocked, and thus, via the coupling with the fin assemblies 600, also results in the vane assemblies deploying from the stowed position to the deployed positions. For example, such a torque applicator can comprise at least one of a torsion bar or torsion spring coupled to the actuator plate 200, and pre-stressed or otherwise biased to apply the driving torque to the actuator plate 200 directly, to thereby pivot the actuator plate 200 from the first pivot position P1 to the second pivot position P2, responsive to the actuator plate 200 being unlocked from the first pivot position P1, and concurrently pivot the fins 650 to the respective deployed positions DP. Alternatively, for example, the torque applicator can comprise at least one of a hydraulic, pneumatic or pyrotechnic actuator, suitably coupled to the actuator plate 200, to apply the required driving torque.
It is to be noted that in some alternative variations of the illustrated example, the torque applicator can be omitted, and the pivoting of the fin assemblies can be accomplished by suitably rolling\spinning the projectile 1, and thus the system 100, about the longitudinal axis LA. Thus, the centripetal force generated by the spinning deploys the fin assemblies 600, once the actuator plate 200 is unlocked from the first pivot position P1, and the deployment of the fins 5650 drives the actuator plate 200 via the coupling, to pivot the actuator plate 200 to the second pivot position P1.
Operation of the fin deployment system example 100 illustrated in
It should be noted that the word “comprising” as used throughout the appended claims is to be interpreted to mean “including but not limited to”.
While there has been shown and disclosed examples in accordance with the presently disclosed subject matter, it will be appreciated that many changes may be made therein without departing from the spirit of the presently disclosed subject matter.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
231186 | Feb 2014 | IL | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/IL2015/050205 | 2/24/2015 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2015/128861 | 9/3/2015 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1376785 | Sellmer | May 1921 | A |
3177809 | Russell-French | Apr 1965 | A |
3188958 | Burke et al. | Jun 1965 | A |
3260205 | Dietrich | Jul 1966 | A |
3578796 | Hagler | May 1971 | A |
3702588 | Simmons | Nov 1972 | A |
3964696 | Orzechowski | Jun 1976 | A |
4165847 | Detalle | Aug 1979 | A |
4667899 | Wedertz | May 1987 | A |
4815682 | Feldmann et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
5046424 | Skowasch et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5240203 | Myers | Aug 1993 | A |
5762294 | Jimmerson | Jun 1998 | A |
5950963 | Speicher et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6073880 | Voigt et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6168111 | Kayser et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6352217 | Hsu et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6454216 | Kiselev et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6557798 | Giesenberg et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6978967 | Scheper et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
7316370 | Sankovic | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7728266 | Melkers | Jun 2010 | B2 |
8367993 | Velez | Feb 2013 | B2 |
20030178527 | Eisentraut et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040021034 | Hellman | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040216635 | Henry et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040217227 | Alculumbre et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050116091 | Kelly | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20060278754 | Sankovic et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20080198060 | Shani et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20120210901 | Bender | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20130087659 | Prampolini | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20140061365 | Roy | Mar 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102230765 | Nov 2011 | CN |
202092524 | Dec 2011 | CN |
3928965 | Mar 1991 | DE |
298844 | Jan 1989 | EP |
448437 | Sep 1991 | EP |
1257613 | Apr 1961 | FR |
2121147 | Dec 1983 | GB |
20060630 | Nov 2008 | RS |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/IL2015/050205 dated Jun. 22, 2015. |
Daniels, P. et al., “Roll-Rate Stabilization of a Missile Configuration with Wrap-Around Fins in Incompressible Flow”, Warfare Analysis Department, Naval Surface Weapons Center, Dahlgren Laboratory, Dahlgren, VA, Dec. 1975, 1-16. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160349025 A1 | Dec 2016 | US |