The present invention relates to a heat exchanger, and more particularly to a mechanical heat exchanger.
A heat exchanger generally comprises tubes, through which a heat transfer fluid is intended to flow, and heat exchange elements connected to these tubes.
A distinction is usually made between brazed heat exchangers and mechanical heat exchangers depending on the method for manufacturing them.
In a mechanical heat exchanger, the heat exchange elements, referred to as “fins” in this case, are connected to the tubes in the following way. First of all, through-holes for the tubes to pass through are made in the fins. These through-holes are generally each delimited by a raised edge forming a neck. Next, the fins are disposed substantially parallel to one another and each tube is inserted into a series of aligned holes in the fins. Finally, a radial expansion of the tubes is brought about by passing an expansion tool through the inside of these tubes so as to mechanically join the tubes and the fins by crimping, the necks delimiting the through-holes for the tubes then forming collars clamped around the tubes.
In order to increase the heat exchange between the fins and the air flow, rows of louvers are usually provided on the fins, which have a flat rectangular overall shape, said louvers forming deflectors and being interposed between the tubes in one and the same row of tubes. In this way, the coefficient of convective heat exchange is improved.
In the prior art, the ratio between the number of louvers and the width of each fin is very often chosen depending on the possibilities afforded by the tools for manufacturing the fins and not on the performance of the heat exchanger.
The aim of the invention is to propose a heat exchanger in which the heat exchange performance is improved.
To this end, the subject of the invention is a heat exchanger comprising:
the tubes being connected to the fin by clamping the tubes in a collar formed in the fin; and
characterized in that, with the fin having a flat rectangular overall shape, the ratio between the number of louvers and the width of the fin is between 0.73 and 1.13.
It has been found, surprisingly, that a ratio between the number of louvers and the width of the fin that is chosen in this specific range makes it possible to significantly increase the performance of the heat exchanger, while limiting pressure losses.
This is because below 0.73, it has been found that the power of heat exchange is not satisfactory. On the other hand, above 1.13, the gain in performance is not advantageous given the increase in pressure losses.
Preferably, the ratio between the number of louvers and the width of the fin is between 0.87 and 1, preferably being 0.93.
The ratio of 0.93 appears to be a good compromise between the power of the heat exchange and the pressure loss.
According to one particular embodiment of the invention, with the heat exchanger comprising superposed first and second fins, each first fin comprises an oblong hole for a tube to pass through and at least one spacer for spacing apart from the second fin, the length of each row of louvers of each fin being equal to the length of the oblong hole, and each row of louvers of each fin comprising an end referred to as a narrow end, extending between the oblong hole and the spacer, the number of louvers at the narrow end being an integer.
This makes it possible to improve the heat exchange performance by inserting as many louvers as possible into the space between the spacers and the tube.
According to one particular embodiment of the invention, with the heat exchanger comprising superposed first and second fins, each first fin comprising an oblong hole for a tube to pass through and at least one spacer for spacing apart from the second fin, each row of louvers of each fin comprising an end referred to as a narrow end, extending between the oblong hole and the spacer, and an end referred to as a wide end, the narrow ends of two consecutive rows of louvers are arranged in each case close to opposite edges of the fin.
This makes it possible to devote a larger part of the surface area of the fin to the louvers, thereby making it possible to further increase the heat exchange between the air flow and the fin.
According to one particular embodiment of the invention, at least one spacer comprises two mutually parallel flat tabs.
According to one particular embodiment of the invention, an angle between an orientation vector and a reference vector is between −10 degrees and 20 degrees, the orientation vector being a vector, the direction of which is a direction substantially parallel to a tab and substantially parallel to the fin and the sense of which is the sense running from the narrow end toward the wide end, and a reference vector being a vector, the direction of which is a direction transverse to the fin and the sense of which is the sense running from the narrow end toward the wide end, the angle becoming negative when the air flow, which is oriented in the same sense as the reference vector, tends to deviate from the row of louvers, and becoming positive in the opposite case.
In the prior art, the angle between the reference vector and orientation vector as defined is generally less than −15 degrees, corresponding to a configuration in which the air flow redirected by a spacer is directed toward the closest tube.
However, it has been found that orienting each spacer further toward the row of louvers, and not toward the closest tube, makes it possible to further increase the heat exchange between the air flow and the fin.
The invention will be understood better from reading the following description, which is given solely by way of example and with reference to the drawings, in which:
The heat exchanger comprises a row of tubes 2 (shown in a truncated manner for reasons of clarity), through which a conventional heat transfer fluid is intended to flow, and superposed fins 4 (only one of which is shown for reasons of clarity) connected to these tubes 2.
The tubes 2 are connected to the fins 4 by clamping the tubes in collars 6 formed in the fins 4. To this end, the fins 4 are provided with through-holes 8 for the tubes to pass through. These through-holes 8 have an oblong overall shape. In the following, they will be referred to as oblong holes 8.
In the example described, the tubes 2 each have an elongate overall shape and have a substantially oblong cross section. The tubes 2 are arranged substantially parallel to one another, so as to form a single row.
The fins 4 have a substantially flat rectangular overall shape and are arranged in the heat exchanger 1 in a manner substantially parallel to one another and perpendicular to the longitudinal directions of the tubes 2.
The heat exchanger 1 is intended to be passed through from upstream to downstream by a flow of air, the fins 4 being intended to extend through this flow. Arrows F indicate the direction of travel of the flow.
In order to increase the heat exchange between the flow F and the fins 4, the heat exchanger 1 also comprises rows 10 of louvers 12, which are formed in each fin 4 and are each interposed between two tubes 2.
In the embodiments shown in
Preferably, this ratio is between 0.87 and 1, and is for example equal to 0.93. The latter choice constitutes a good compromise between performance of the heat exchanger 1 and pressure losses.
Specifically, tests have for example shown that, with a ratio above 1.13, the gain in performance compared with a ratio of 0.93 is 0.4%, this not being advantageous with regard to the increase in external pressure losses, which is 3.4%.
By contrast, other tests have revealed that, with a ratio less than 0.73, a satisfactory heat exchange power is not obtained since the latter decreases, compared with a ratio of 0.93, by 3.6%.
With the aid of these tests, it was determined that a particularly satisfactory ratio was 0.93. Above 1.13, there is a gain in power, but the cost in terms of pressure losses is too high. By contrast, below 0.73, the power level is insufficient.
The heat exchanger 1 also comprises spacers 13 between two superposed fins 4.
More particularly, the spacers 13 comprise two flat, mutually parallel tabs 14.
The spacers 13 are produced for example from a punched hole in the fin 4.
In the example shown in the figures, the tabs 14 are each in the overall shape of a half-disk.
In the embodiments shown in
Each row 10 of louvers of the fin 4 comprises an end 16 referred to as a narrow end, extending between the oblong hole 8 and the spacer 13.
On account of the presence of the spacers 13, the louvers 18 at the narrow end 16 are less long than all the other louvers 12 in the row 10.
For each row 10 of louvers, the number of narrow-end louvers 18 extending between the hole 8 and the spacers 14 is an integer.
For example, as can be seen in
Furthermore, each row 10 of louvers 10 of the fin 4 comprises an end 20 referred to as a wide end, in which the louvers 22 are longer than those at the narrow end 16.
Thus, in the example shown, the fin 4 is provided with a single spacer 13 between two consecutive tubes 2 in the row of tubes 2, and not two between two consecutive tubes 2 as in the prior art.
The narrow ends 16 of two consecutive rows 10 of louvers are more particularly arranged in each case close to opposite edges 24 of the fin 4, as can be seen in FIGS. 1 and 2.
As illustrated in
Likewise, a reference vector R is defined as being a vector, the direction of which is the direction transverse to the fin 4 and the sense of which is the sense running from the narrow end 16 toward the wide end 17.
In all the embodiments shown in the figures, the angle α between the orientation vector O and the reference vector R is between −10 degrees and 20 degrees.
In the following text, the angle α will be considered to become negative when the air flow F, which is oriented in the same sense as the reference vector, tends to deviate from the adjacent row 10 of louvers, that is to say toward the tube 2 closest to the spacer 13 in the examples shown.
In particular, in the first embodiment of the invention that is illustrated in
By contrast, the angle α becomes positive when the air flow F redirected by the spacers 13 tends to be directed further toward the adjacent row 10 of louvers, as is the case in
In this second embodiment, the angle α between the orientation vector O and the reference vector R is, in accordance with the convention defined above, equal to 15 degrees.
This final configuration provides good results with regard to the performance of the heat exchanger 1.
The invention is not limited to the embodiments presented, and further embodiments will be clearly apparent to a person skilled in the art.
In particular, a combination of the different embodiments can also be envisioned in order to obtain the desired effects.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
15 56760 | Jul 2015 | FR | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2016/065918 | 7/6/2016 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2017/012867 | 1/26/2017 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4328861 | Cheong | May 1982 | A |
4434844 | Sakitani | Mar 1984 | A |
4705105 | Cur | Nov 1987 | A |
5062475 | Bemisderfer et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5076353 | Haussmann | Dec 1991 | A |
5109919 | Sakuma | May 1992 | A |
5207270 | Yokoyama | May 1993 | A |
5509469 | Obosu | Apr 1996 | A |
5582244 | Helms | Dec 1996 | A |
5692561 | Kang | Dec 1997 | A |
5722485 | Love | Mar 1998 | A |
5732768 | Fraulo | Mar 1998 | A |
5752567 | Obosu | May 1998 | A |
5775413 | Kawanabe | Jul 1998 | A |
5947194 | Baek | Sep 1999 | A |
5975199 | Park | Nov 1999 | A |
5975200 | Kato | Nov 1999 | A |
7182127 | Oh | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7261147 | Oh | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7578339 | Kaga | Aug 2009 | B2 |
8267160 | Hancock | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8978743 | Tamura | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9638476 | Kerler | May 2017 | B2 |
D800282 | Hanson | Oct 2017 | S |
20050016718 | Papapanu | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20090308585 | Chen | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20130264038 | Kerler | Oct 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101655296 | Feb 2010 | CN |
201876180 | Jun 2011 | CN |
0 086559 | Aug 1983 | EP |
2 447 656 | May 2012 | EP |
2 447 659 | May 2012 | EP |
2 866 948 | Sep 2005 | FR |
2006005594 | Jan 2006 | WO |
10 2012 002234 | Aug 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report issued in PCT/EP2016/065918 dated Aug. 5, 2016 (3 pages). |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority issued in PCT/EP2016/065918 dated Aug. 5, 2016 (5 pages). |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability from PCT/EP2016/065918 completed on Jan. 23, 2018 (6 pages). |
Rejection Decision in corresponding Chinese Application No. 201680047023.5, dated Jul. 31, 2020 (7 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180266772 A1 | Sep 2018 | US |