Patent Grant
10653986
Fine fiber products, including those suitable for use as filter media, as well as related assemblies, systems and methods, are described.
Filter media can be used to remove contamination in a variety of applications. Depending on the application, the filter media may be designed to have different performance characteristics. In general, filter media can be formed of a web of fibers. The fiber web provides a porous structure that permits fluid (e.g., a liquid or a gas) to flow through the filter media. Contaminant particles contained within the fluid may be trapped on the fibrous web. Filter media characteristics, such as fiber diameter and basis weight, affect filter performance including filter efficiency and resistance to fluid flow through the filter.
Fiber webs can be formed by different processes. In a meltblowing process, a fiber web may be formed by extruding a polymeric material through a die and then attenuating the resulting filaments with a heated, high-velocity air stream. This process may generate fine fibers that can be collected onto a moving collector belt where they intertwine with each other to form a fiber web. There are several parameters during the extrusion process that can affect the structural and performance characteristics of the resulting fiber webs. Improvements in the extrusion process may lead to fiber webs having improved structural and performance characteristics, such as reduced fiber diameters, increased surface area, and/or reduced basis weight. Such improvements would find use in a number of different fields where fiber webs can be used, such as in filtration applications.
The disclosure generally relates to fine fiber products, as well as related assemblies, systems and methods.
In some embodiments, a series of fiber webs are provided. In one set of embodiments, a fiber web includes a plurality of meltblown fibers formed of a polymeric material and having an average fiber diameter between about 0.1 microns and about 1.5 microns. The fiber web has an air permeability between about 10 CFM and about 1800 CFM, a surface area between about 0.1 m2/g and about 6.0 m2/g, a basis weight between about 1.0 g/m2 and about 100 g/m2, and a thickness between about 0.0005 inches and about 0.04 inches. The fiber web also has a surface density of particles formed of the polymeric material of less than about 1.6 particles/in2, wherein each of the particles has a largest cross-sectional dimension of about 1.0 mm or greater.
In another set of embodiments, a fiber web includes a plurality of meltblown fibers formed of a polymeric material and having an average fiber diameter between about 0.1 microns and about 0.6 microns. The fiber web has an air permeability between about 10 CFM and about 1800 CFM, a surface area between about 0.1 m2/g and about 6.0 m2/g, a basis weight between about 1.0 g/m2 and about 100 g/m2, and a thickness between about 0.0005 inches and about 0.04 inches. The fiber web also has a surface density of particles formed of the polymeric material of less than about 5 particles/in2, wherein each of the particles has a largest cross-sectional dimension of about 1.0 mm or greater.
In another set of embodiments, a fiber web includes a plurality of meltblown fibers having an average fiber diameter between about 0.1 microns and about 1.5 microns. The fiber web has an air permeability between about 10 and about 1800 CFM, a surface area greater than about 2.0 m2/g, a basis weight between about 1.0 g/m2 and about 100 g/m2, and a thickness between about 0.0005 inches and about 0.04 inches.
In some embodiments, a series of methods of forming fiber webs is provided. In one set of embodiments, a method of forming a fiber web includes introducing a polymeric material into an extrusion system including an extruder inlet, a die outlet, and a processing space between the extruder inlet and the die outlet, wherein the extrusion system comprises a extruder barrel having an inner diameter of about 4 inches or less, and processing the polymeric material in the extrusion system such that the polymeric material has a dwell time of less than about 85 minutes in the processing space. The method also includes forming a plurality of meltblown fibers from the polymeric material, wherein the plurality of meltblown fibers have an average diameter between about 0.1 microns and about 1.5 microns, and forming a fiber web comprising the plurality of meltblown fibers.
In another set of embodiments, a method of forming a fiber web includes introducing a polymeric material into an extrusion system including an extruder inlet, a die outlet, and a processing space between the extruder inlet and the die outlet having a volume of less than about 25,000 cm3. The method also includes forming a plurality of meltblown fibers from the polymeric material, wherein the plurality of meltblown fibers have an average diameter between about 0.1 microns and about 1.5 microns, and forming a fiber web comprising the plurality of meltblown fibers.
In another set of embodiments, a method of forming a fiber web includes introducing a polymeric material into an extrusion system including an extruder inlet, a die outlet, and a processing space between the extruder inlet and the die outlet, and processing the polymeric material in the extrusion system such that the polymeric material has a dwell time in the processing space of less than about 30 minutes and a throughput of less than about 85 lbs/hr. The method also includes forming a plurality of meltblown fibers from the polymeric material, wherein the plurality of meltblown fibers have an average diameter between about 0.1 microns and about 1.5 microns, and forming a fiber web comprising the plurality of meltblown fibers.
In another set of embodiments, a method of forming a fiber web includes introducing a polymeric material into an extrusion system including an extruder inlet, a die outlet, and a processing space between the extruder inlet and the die outlet, and processing the polymeric material in the extrusion system such that the polymeric material has a dwell time in the processing space of less than about 50 minutes and a throughput of less than about 55 lbs/hr. The method also includes forming a plurality of meltblown fibers from the polymeric material, wherein the plurality of meltblown fibers have an average diameter between about 0.1 microns and about 1.5 microns, and forming a fiber web comprising the plurality of meltblown fibers.
Other advantages and novel features of the present invention will become apparent from the following detailed description of various non-limiting embodiments of the invention when considered in conjunction with the accompanying figures. In cases where the present specification and a document incorporated by reference include conflicting and/or inconsistent disclosure, the present specification shall control. If two or more documents incorporated by reference include conflicting and/or inconsistent disclosure with respect to each other, then the document having the later effective date shall control.
Non-limiting embodiments of the present invention will be described by way of example with reference to the accompanying figure, which is schematic and is not intended to be drawn to scale. In the figure, each identical or nearly identical component illustrated is typically represented by a single numeral. For purposes of clarity, not every component is labeled, nor is every component of each embodiment of the invention shown where illustration is not necessary to allow those of ordinary skill in the art to understand the invention. In the figures:
Fine fiber products including fiber webs, as well as related assemblies, systems and methods, are described. In some embodiments, fiber webs described herein may include fine fibers and relatively low amounts of degraded polymer formed during a fiber extrusion process. Polymer degradation may result in the formation of polymeric particles, which may lessen the properties of fiber webs used for filter media or other applications. Polymer degradation may be decreased by, for example, decreasing the amount of time (e.g., dwell time) the polymeric material spends at relatively high temperatures and pressures in certain portions of the extrusion system. Factors influencing this decreased dwell time are balanced with the desire to form fibers having small diameters which in certain conventional processes are produced at longer dwell times. In some embodiments, fiber webs described herein have a relatively low air permeability and a relatively high surface area, which can lead to increased performance. Other advantages of the articles, methods and systems described herein are also provided.
This disclosure describes several methods for addressing some problems associated with certain polymer fiber extrusion processes. One problem involves the formation of fibers having very small diameters. As described in more detail below, generally the formation of fibers having very small diameters in certain extrusion processes uses a relatively low polymer throughput. However, a low throughput may lead to the formation of degraded polymeric material in the form of particles during an extrusion process. This degradation may be caused by the polymeric material being subjected to the relatively high temperatures and pressures of the extrusion process for prolonged periods of time and/or to other conditions. As the amount of degraded polymer increases, less fiber is produced per unit of polymer. For fiber webs used for filtration or certain other applications, this occurrence is not desirable as it may result in having to form fiber webs having a higher basis weight in order to achieve the same level of performance as fiber webs without degraded polymer, all other factors being equal.
In the past, increased amounts of degraded polymer formed during an extrusion process sometimes results in the practitioner having to change certain parameters of the extrusion process to reduce the amount of degraded polymer; however, these changes may lead to the formation of fibers having relatively larger diameters and/or fiber webs having less desirable performance characteristics. The inventors have discovered within the context of the invention that by balancing certain parameters of an extrusion process and/or by including one or more additives to the polymeric material used to form the fibers, fine fiber webs having relatively low amounts of polymer degradation, increased performance, and/or better structural characteristics can be achieved. Examples of parameters that can be varied and additives that can be used to achieve this result are described in more detail below.
Although much of the description provided herein refers to a fiber web or a meltblown product used as filter media, it should be understood that the fiber web and/or meltblown product can be used in other applications in other embodiments.
As shown illustratively in
The polymer exiting the one or more holes of the die outlet is formed into meltblown fibers 50 onto a collector table 60 which includes a collector belt 70. The diameter of the fibers may be controlled in part by air or other gases introduced into channels 55, which can be used to quench the fibers. The heated, high velocity air impinges the polymer on either side of the die outlet as the polymer exits out of the die outlet. This air may attenuate the fiber to the final fiber size. Quenching can be controlled by modifying the quench air temperature and quench air volume.
The fibers collected onto the collector belt may be pulled towards the collector table using a suction box 74. The fibers collected onto the collector belt form a fiber web. The distance 75 from the die tip to the collector table can be varied to control the density of the fiber web (e.g., as the distance is increased, the fiber velocity is decreased and the fiber temperature is reduced so packing of the fibers is less dense, resulting in a more lofty web). As the distance is increased, the velocity of the fiber is generally decreased, making a loftier fiber web. The collector suction is also controlled, which also impacts the loft of the fiber web. The basis weight and thickness of the fiber web can be varied by controlling the collector belt speed. The collector belt transports the fiber web to a winder 80 where the fiber web can be further processed if desired.
In certain embodiments, a method of forming a fiber web may involve controlling the dwell time of the polymeric material in a processing space of a system such as the one shown in
Dwell time=V·ρ/Th (1)
where V is the volume of the processing space as defined above, ρ is the density of the polymeric material being extruded, and Th is the throughput of the polymeric material through the die body.
Without wishing to be bound by any theory, the inventors believe that in some embodiments, in order to form fine fiber webs, relatively low throughputs may be used during the extrusion process. Relatively low throughputs allow fibers having small diameters to be formed; however, low throughputs may also result in a certain amount of the polymeric material used to form the fibers to become degraded due to the polymeric material being subjected to the relatively high temperatures and pressures of the extrusion process for prolonged periods of time (i.e., a relatively high dwell time). Degradation may result in the formation of small polymeric particles as described in more detail below, which may lessen the filtration properties of the fiber web. If relatively high throughputs are used, the dwell time of the polymeric material decreases; however, fibers having larger diameters may be formed. As a result, in some embodiments a suitable process for forming fine fibers with low polymer degradation may involve balancing both the throughput and the dwell time of the polymeric material during the extrusion process.
The inventors have recognized within the context of the invention that one method for decreasing the dwell time of the polymeric material while obtaining small fiber diameters is to decrease the volume of the processing space. As the processing space includes the combined volume between an extruder inlet and a die outlet, the volume of the processing space may be decreased by, for example, decreasing the diameter and/or length of the extruder barrel, decreasing the number, diameter and/or length of any conduits connecting the extruder and die body, decreasing the internal volume of the die body, and combinations thereof. Using a relatively low processing space volume during an extrusion process can allow, in some embodiments, a relatively low polymer throughput to be used, while still maintaining a relatively low dwell time. As such, fine fiber webs having relatively low polymer degradation may be formed.
The inventors have also observed within the context of the invention that in some embodiments, the temperature of the polymeric material in the processing space may have relatively little effect on the amount of polymer degradation, e.g., compared to the dwell time. One of ordinary skill in the art would have expected that polymer degradation was caused by the polymeric material being subjected to the relatively high temperatures (and pressures) during the extrusion process. Accordingly, to decrease the amount of polymer degradation, one of ordinary skill in the art would likely decrease the temperature of the polymeric material in the extruder and/or die body. One of ordinary skill in the art would not have expected that low amounts of polymer degradation can be achieved while using relatively high processing temperatures in combination with modifying other parameters as described in certain methods provided herein.
As noted above, in some embodiments, a method of forming a fiber web may involve controlling the dwell time of the polymeric material in a processing space of an extrusion system. In certain embodiments, the dwell time may range between about 1 minute and about 2,600 minutes. For example, the dwell time of the polymeric material may be between about 1 minute and about 1,500 minutes, between about 2 minutes and about 1,000 minutes, between about 2 minutes and about 500 minutes, between about 2 minutes and about 100 minutes, between about 3 minutes and about 90 minutes, between about 5 minutes and about 76 minutes, between about 5 minutes and about 50 minutes, between about 5 minutes and about 30 minutes, or between about 1 minute and about 15 minutes. In some embodiments, the dwell time of a polymeric material in a processing space is less than about 2,000 minutes, less than about 1,500 minutes, less than about 1,000 minutes, less than about 500 minutes, less than about 200 minutes, less than about 100 minutes, less than about 75 minutes, less than about 50 minutes, less than about 30 minutes, less than about 20 minutes, less than about 15 minutes, less than about 10 minutes, or less than about 5 minutes. Other ranges and values of dwell time are also possible.
The polymer throughput may range, for example, between about 1 lb/hour and about 200 lbs/hour. For instance, the polymer throughput may be between about 1 lb/hour and 150 lbs/hours, between about 1 lb/hour and 100 lbs/hour, between about 2 lbs/hour and about 90 lbs/hour, between about 20 lbs/hour and about 85 lbs/hour, between about 20 lbs/hour and about 60 lbs/hour, between about 40 lbs/hour and about 85 lbs/hour, or between about 1 lb/hour and 20 lbs/hour. In some embodiments, the polymer throughput may be less than about 200 lbs/hour, less than about 150 lbs/hour, less than about 100 lbs/hour, less than about 85 lbs/hour, less than about 60 lbs/hour, less than about 40 lbs/hour, less than about 20 lbs/hour. In other embodiments, the polymer throughput may be greater than about 20 lbs/hour, greater than about 40 lbs/hour, greater than about 85 lbs/hour, greater than about 100 lbs/hour, greater than about 150 lbs/hour, or greater than about 200 lbs/hour. Other ranges and values of polymer throughput are also possible.
The volume of the processing space where polymeric material can reside may be varied in some embodiments, e.g., to achieve a particular dwell time. The volume of the processing space may range, for example, between about 10 cm3 and about 30,000 cm3, between about 10 cm3 and about 25,000 cm3, between about 10 cm3 and about 20,000 cm3, between about 10 cm3 and about 15,000 cm3, between about 10 cm3 and about 12,000 cm3, between about 10 cm3 and about 10,000 cm3, between about 10 cm3 and about 8,000 cm3, between about 10 cm3 and about 6,000 cm3, between about 10 cm3 and about 4,000 cm3, between about 10 cm3 and about 2,000 cm3, between about 10 cm3 and about 1,000 cm3, or between about 10 cm3 and about 500 cm3. In some cases, the volume of the processing space is less than about 30,000 cm3, less than about 25,000 cm3, less than about 20,000 cm3, less than about 15,000 cm3, less than about 12,000 cm3, less than about 10,000 cm3, less than about 8,000 cm3, less than about 6,000 cm3, less than about 4,000 cm3, less than 2,000 cm3, less than about 1,000 cm3, or less than about 500 cm3. Other ranges and values of processing space volume are also possible.
The size of the extruder screw (e.g., screw diameter) may be varied in some embodiments, e.g., to achieve a particular processing space volume. In some embodiments, the extruder screw diameter may be between about 0.25 and about 6.0 inches. For instance, the extruder screw diameter may be between about 0.25 inches and about 5.5 inches, between about 0.5 inches and about 5.0 inches, between about 1.0 inch and about 4.0 inches, between about 1.0 inch and about 3.5 inches, or between about 1.0 inch and about 3.0 inches. In some cases, extruder screw diameter may be about 6.0 inches or less, about 5.5 inches or less, about 5.0 inches or less, about 4.5 inches or less, about 4.0 inches or less, about 3.5 inches or less, about 3.0 inches or less, about 2.5 inches or less, about 2.0 inches or less, or about 1.5 inches or less. Other ranges and values of extruder screw diameters are also possible.
The extruder barrel diameter (e.g., the inner diameter of the barrel) may be varied in some embodiments and may be chosen to match the size of the extruder screw. For example, an extruder screw having a 4 inch diameter may be matched with an extruder barrel having an inner diameter of about 4.0 inches. In some embodiments, the extruder barrel may have an inner diameter of between about 0.25 and about 6.0 inches. For instance, the inner diameter of the extruder barrel may be between about 0.25 inches and about 5.5 inches, between about 0.5 inches and about 5.0 inches, between about 1.0 inch and about 4.0 inches, between about 1.0 inch and about 3.5 inches, or between about 1.0 inch and about 3.0 inches. In some cases, the inner diameter of the extruder barrel may be about 6.0 inches or less, about 5.5 inches or less, about 5.0 inches or less, about 4.5 inches or less, about 4.0 inches or less, about 3.5 inches or less, about 3.0 inches or less, about 2.5 inches or less, about 2.0 inches or less, or about 1.5 inches or less. Other ranges and values of extruder barrel inner diameters are also possible.
In certain embodiments, the length of the extruder barrel may be varied, e.g., to achieve a particular processing space volume. In some embodiments, the length of the extruder barrel may be between about 1 ft and about 15 ft. For instance, the length of the extruder barrel may be between about 1 ft and about 12 ft, between about 1 ft and about 10 ft, between about 1 ft and about 8 ft, between about 1 ft and about 6 ft, between about 1 ft and about 5 ft, between about 1 ft and about 4 ft, or between about 1 ft and about 2 ft. In some cases, the length of the extruder barrel is about 15 ft or less, about 12 ft or less, about 10 ft or less, about 8 ft or less, about 6 ft or less, about 5 ft or less, about 4 ft or less, about 3 ft or less, or about 2 ft or less. Other ranges and values of extruder barrel lengths are also possible.
In certain embodiments, the average diameter of one or more conduits between an extruder outlet and a die inlet (e.g., space where a polymeric material can reside) may be varied, e.g., to achieve a particular processing space volume. In some embodiments, the average conduit diameter may be between about 0.1 and about 10.0 inches. For instance, the average conduit diameter may be between about 0.3 inches and about 8.0 inches, between about 0.3 inches and about 5.0 inches, between about 0.1 inches and about 3.0 inches, between about 0.1 inches and about 2.0 inches, between about 0.5 inches and about 2.0 inches, between about 0.1 inches and about 1.8 inches, between about 0.1 inches and about 1.6 inches, between about 0.1 inches and about 1.4 inches, between about 0.1 inches and about 1.2 inches, between about 0.1 inches and about 1.0 inches, or between about 0.1 inches and about 0.8 inches. In some cases, the average conduit diameter is about 10.0 inches or less, about 8.0 inches or less, about 6.0 inches or less, about 4.0 inches or less, about 3.0 inches or less, about 2.0 inches or less, about 1.8 inches or less, about 1.6 inches or less, about 1.4 inches or less, about 1.2 inches or less, about 1.0 inches or less, about 0.8 inches or less, or about 0.7 inches or less. Other ranges and values of average conduit diameters are also possible.
In certain embodiments, the combined length of one or more conduits between an extruder outlet and a die inlet (e.g., space where a polymeric material can reside) may be varied, e.g., to achieve a particular processing space volume. In some embodiments, the combined conduit length may be between about 0.5 ft and about 75 ft. For instance, the combined conduit length may be between about 5 ft and about 50 ft, between about 5 ft and about 40 ft, between about 5 ft and about 30 ft, between about 10 ft and about 25 ft, between about 5 ft and about 25 ft, between about 5 ft and about 20 ft, between about 5 ft and about 15 ft, between about 1 ft and about 12 ft, between about 1 ft and about 10 ft, between about 1 ft and about 8 ft. In some cases, the conduit length may be about 75 ft or less, about 50 ft or less, about 40 ft or less, about 30 ft or less, about 25 ft or less, about 20 ft or less, about 15 ft or less, about 12 ft or less, about 10 ft or less, about 8 ft or less, or about 6 ft or less. Other ranges and values of combined conduit lengths are also possible.
The volume of the die body (including the spin pack) where polymeric material can reside may be varied in some embodiments. The volume of the die body may range, for example, between about 300 cm3 and about 15,000 cm3, between about 300 cm3 and about 13,000 cm3, between about 300 cm3 and about 11,000 cm3, between about 300 cm3 and about 9,000 cm3, between about 300 cm3 and about 6,000 cm3, between about 300 cm3 and about 4,000 cm3, between about 300 cm3 and about 2,000 cm3, between about 300 cm3 and about 1,000 cm3, or between about 300 cm3 and about 600 cm3. In some cases, the volume of the die body is 15,000 cm3, less than about 13,000 cm3, less than about 10,000 cm3, less than about 8,000 cm3, less than about 6,000 cm3, less than about 4,000 cm3, less than 2,000 cm3, less than about 1,000 cm3, or less than about 600 cm3. Other ranges and values of die volume are also possible.
In some embodiments, an extrusion process described herein may include a particular die temperature range or value. In general, the die temperature may be selected to suitably soften (e.g., melt) the polymeric material that is to be formed into fibers. In some embodiments, the die temperature is between about 400° F. and about 630° F. For instance, the die temperature may be between about 410° F. and about 600° F., between about 410° F. and about 580° F., between about 420° F. and about 550° F., or between about 420° F. and about 500° F. In certain embodiments, the die temperature may be greater than about 400° F., greater than about 420° F., greater than about 440° F., greater than about 460° F., greater than about 480° F., or greater than about 500° F. In other embodiments, the die temperature may be less than about 630° F., less than about 550° F., less than about 500° F., or less than about 450° F. Other ranges and values of die temperatures are also possible.
The temperature of the extruder barrel typically varies from the inlet of the extruder to the outlet of the extruder to allow the polymeric material to flow more easily. The minimum temperature used to heat the polymer in the extruder barrel may be, for example, at least about 300° F., at least about 350° F., at least about 400° F., or at least about 420° F. The maximum temperature of the extruder barrel may be, for example, between about 400° F. and about 630° F. For instance, the maximum temperature of the extruder barrel may be between about 410° F. and about 600° F., between about 410° F. and about 580° F., between about 420° F. and about 550° F., between about 420° F. and about 480° F., or between about 420° F. and about 500° F. In certain embodiments, the maximum temperature of the extruder barrel may be greater than about 400° F., greater than about 420° F., greater than about 440° F., greater than about 460° F., greater than about 480° F., or greater than about 500° F. In other embodiments, the maximum temperature of the extruder barrel may be less than about 630° F., less than about 550° F., less than about 500° F., or less than about 450° F. In some embodiments, the maximum temperature of the extruder barrel is at least about 10° F. lower, at least about 20° F. lower, at least about 30° F. lower, or at least about 40° F. lower than the temperature of the die body. Other ranges and values of temperatures of the extruder barrel are also possible.
The process air temperature may also be varied. In some embodiments, the process air temperature may be between about 400° F. and about 630° F. For instance, the process air temperature may be between about 410° F. and about 600° F., between about 410° F. and about 580° F., between about 420° F. and about 550° F., between about 440° F. and about 530° F., or between about 420° F. and about 500° F. Other ranges and values of process air temperatures are also possible.
In some embodiments, it may be desirable to vary the process air volume. As described above, the process air is the heated air on either side of the die tip where the fibers are formed. This heated air (typically the same temperature as the die tip) impinges the fibers and helps attenuate the fibers to the final fiber size. It is believed that, in some embodiments, as the air volume increases, the fiber diameter can decrease. The process air volume can be selected as appropriate. In some embodiments, the process air volume may be between about 1,000 pounds/hour-meter (lbs/hr·m) and about 4,000 lbs/hr·m. For instance, the process air volume may be between about 1,500 lbs/hr·m and about 3,800 lbs/hr·m, between about 2,500 lbs/hr·m and about 3,750 lbs/hr·m, or between about 3,000 lbs/hr·m and about 3,500 lbs/hr·m. Other ranges and values of process air volumes are also possible.
The quench air temperature may also be varied. In some embodiments, the quench air temperature may be between about 0° F. and about 200° F. For instance, the quench air temperature may be between about 0° F. and about 150° F., between about 0° F. and about 100° F., between about 0° F. and about 75° F., between about 0° F. and about 50° F., between about 0° F. and about 30° F., or between about 0° F. and about 20° F. Other ranges and values of quench air temperatures are also possible.
In some embodiments, it may be desirable to vary the quench air volume. In some embodiments, the quench air volume may be between about 0 pounds/hour (lbs/hr) and about 750 lbs/hr. For instance, the quench air volume may be between about 0 lbs/hr and about 500 lbs/hr, between about 0 lbs/hr and about 250 lbs/hr, or between about 0 lbs/hr and about 150 lbs/hr. Other ranges and values of quench air volumes are also possible.
The size of the die outlets (e.g., holes) and number of outlets per inch for the die can generally be selected as desired. In some embodiments, the die can have about 35 holes per inch with 0.0125″ holes. In certain embodiments, the die can have about 70 holes per inch with 0.007″ holes. In some embodiments, the die can have from about 25 holes per inch to about 250 holes per inch. In certain cases, the die may include about 35 holes per inch or greater, about 50 holes per inch or greater, or about 70 holes per inch or greater. Other dies can optionally be used.
In some embodiments, the distance from the die tip to the collector may be varied. The distance from the die tip to the collector may be, for example, between about 3 inches and about 80 inches. For instance, the distance from the die tip to the collector may be between about 3 inches and about 50 inches, between about 4 inches and about 40 inches, between about 5 inches and about 25 inches, or between about 6 inches and about 15 inches. Other ranges and values of distances from the die tip to the collector are also possible.
The vacuum level created by the suction box can be selected as appropriate. In some embodiments, the vacuum level may be between about 1 inches of water and about 60 inches of water. For instance, the vacuum level may be between about 10 inches of water and about 50 inches of water, between about 20 inches of water and about 40 inches of water, between about 20 inches of water and about 30 inches of water, or between about 30 inches of water and about 40 inches of water.
The line speed at which the collector belt moves can be selected as desired to form a fiber web. In some embodiments, the collector belt may move at a line speed between about 1 ft/min and about 400 ft/min. For instance, the collector belt may move at a line speed between about 10 ft/min and about 200 ft/min, between about 50 ft/min and about 150 ft/min, between about 50 ft/min and about 100 ft/min, or between about 75 ft/min and about 150 ft/min.
It should be understood that the values and ranges of the parameters described above can be used in different combinations to control fiber formation during an extrusion process. For example, in some embodiments a relatively low dwell time and a relatively low throughput may be used to form fine fibers. For instance, in one set of embodiments, a method may include subjecting the polymeric material to a dwell time of less than about 30 minutes and a throughput of less than about 85 lbs/hr. In another set of embodiments, the polymeric material may have a dwell time of less than about 50 minutes and a throughput of less than about 55 lbs/hr. In some embodiments, using these or other parameters, fiber webs having relatively low surface densities of particles can be formed as described in more detail below.
In some embodiments, varying the above-noted parameters during an extrusion process, and/or using one or more additives described herein, may result in essentially none or relatively low amounts of polymer degradation during fiber formation. In some cases, such processes can be used to form fine fibers, such as ones having a diameter in one of the ranges described herein (e.g., an average diameter between about 0.1 and about 1.5 microns, or between about 0.1 and about 0.6 microns). Without wishing to be bound by any theory, the inventors believe that subjecting the polymer material used to form the fibers to relatively high temperatures and pressures for extended periods of time in an extrusion system can cause the polymeric material to degrade. Degradation may involve chain scission, i.e., shortening of the polymer chains to produce lower molecular weight polymers, and/or other forms of decomposition (e.g., chemical decomposition, thermal decomposition, ionization). As a result of polymer degradation, small polymeric particles may be formed. These particles may have the same chemical composition as the polymeric material used to form the fibers (but having a lower molecular weight), or may be a derivative of the polymeric material used to form the fibers. The particles may be associated with the fiber web in various configurations. For instance, the particles may reside on the surface of the fibers, on the surface of the fiber web, in the center of the fiber web, or in combinations thereof. As noted above, as the amount of degraded polymer increases, less fiber is produced per unit of polymer. For fiber webs used for filtration, for example, this occurrence is not desirable as it may result in increased basis weight in order to achieve the same level of performance as fiber webs without degraded polymer, all other factors being equal.
The shape and size of the polymeric particles formed may vary, and in some cases, the particles can even agglomerate to form larger particles. It should be understood that the polymeric particles described herein are different from fibers. The polymeric particles are non-fibrous, and generally have an aspect ratio (i.e., a length to largest cross-sectional dimension) of less than 50:1 and a largest cross-sectional dimension of at least 0.2 mm. In some embodiments, a particle may have a largest cross-sectional dimension of about 0.2 mm or greater, about 0.5 mm or greater, about 1.0 mm or greater, about 1.5 mm or greater, about 2.0 mm or greater, about 2.5 mm or greater, about 3.0 mm or greater, about 3.5 mm or greater, about 4.0 mm or greater, about 4.5 mm or greater, about 5.0 mm or greater, about 5.5 mm or greater, about 6.0 mm or greater, about 6.5 mm or greater, about 7.0 mm or greater, about 7.5 mm or greater, about 8.0 mm or greater, about 8.5 mm or greater, about 9.0 mm or greater, about 9.5 mm or greater, or about 10.0 mm or greater. Other values and ranges of particle size are also possible.
In certain embodiments, the average molecular weight of the particles formed during a fiber extrusion process may be less than about ½ the average molecular weight of the polymer used to form the fibers. For instance, the average molecular weight of the particles formed during a fiber extrusion process may be less than about ⅛, less than about 1/64, or less than about 1/200 the average molecular weight of the polymer used to form the fibers. Other values of molecular weight of the particles associated with a fiber web are also possible.
In some embodiments, a fiber web described herein may include a relatively low number of or essentially no particles on its surface. The amount of particles may be measured by determining the surface density of particles on the fiber web, i.e., the number of particles on a surface of the fiber web per unit area of the fiber web surface. For instance, a fiber web may have a surface density of particles of less than about 12.0 particles/inch2, less than about 11.5 particles/inch2, less than about 11.0 particles/inch2, less than about 10.5 particles/inch2, less than about 10.0 particles/inch2, less than about 9.5 particles/inch2, less than about 9.0 particles/inch2, less than about 8.5 particles/inch2, less than about 8.0 particles/inch2, less than about 7.5 particles/inch2, less than about 7.0 particles/inch2, less than about 6.5 particles/inch2, less than about 6.0 particles/inch2, less than about 5.5 particles/inch2, less than about 5.0 particles/inch2, less than about 4.5 particles/inch2, less than about 4.0 particles/inch2, less than about 3.5 particles/inch2, less than about 3.0 particles/inch2, less than about 2.7 particles/inch2, less than about 2.5 particles/inch2, less than about 2.2 particles/inch2, less than about 2.0 particles/inch2, less than about 1.8 particles/inch2, less than about 1.6 particles/inch2, less than about 1.5 particles/inch2, less than about 1.3 particles/inch2, less than about 1.0 particles/inch2, less than about 0.8 particles/inch2, less than about 0.5 particles/inch2, or less than about 0.3 particles/inch2, wherein each of the particles has a largest cross-sectional dimension of one of the ranges or values described above. For example, in one particular embodiment, a fiber web has a surface density of particles of less than about 3.0 particles/inch2, wherein each of the particles has a largest cross-sectional dimension of between about 0.2 mm or greater. In this embodiment, even though the fiber web may include some particles having a largest cross-sectional dimension smaller than about 0.2 mm, these particles are not accounted for in calculating the surface density of particles. In another embodiment, a fiber web has a surface density of particles of less than about 3.0 particles/inch2, wherein each of the particles has a largest cross-sectional dimension of about 1.0 mm or greater. In this embodiment, even though the fiber web may include some particles having a largest cross-sectional dimension smaller than about 1.0 mm, these particles are not accounted for in calculating the surface density of particles. Other surface densities of particles in a particular size range or value are also possible.
The number of particles per area of fiber web can be determined as follows. A sample of fiber web can be layered together with carbon paper and a white sheet of standard copy paper, where the carbon paper is positioned between the fiber web and the copy paper. The composite structure can be placed in a continuous belt press where the following conditions are employed: a line speed of 2.5 m/min, a pressure of 6 bar, and a temperature of about 68° F.-80° F. (room temperature). After exposure to these conditions, the degraded polymer particles, if present, may lie at an elevated position compared to the fibers, and appear as small “dots” on the underlying copy paper. If a darker image is needed for detection, the copy paper can be photocopied with a standard copier to darken the carbon image. This copy paper image can be scanned using standard imaging software, and software (e.g., ImageJ software available for download at http://rsbweb.nih.gov/ij/) can be used to determine the number of “dots” on the image. These “dots” may be measured in pixels, and each pixel can be correlated to a certain size to determine the size and number of particles. For instance, 1 pixel may correspond to 0.2646 mm, so a “dot” having a size of 1 pixel on the image may correspond to 1 particle having a largest dimension of 0.2646 mm; a “dot” having a size of 4 pixels on the image may correspond to 1 particle having a largest dimension of 1.1 mm. Pixel sizes may vary depending on the imaging hardware and/or software used. To calculate a surface density of particles, wherein each of the particles has a largest cross-sectional dimension of, for example, about 1.0 mm or greater, only the “dots” having a size of at least 4 pixels (e.g., a largest cross-sectional dimension of about 1.0 mm or greater) would be counted. This number would be divided by the area of the fiber web used for counting the particles to determine the surface density of particles. In this particular instance, even though the fiber web may include some particles having a largest cross-sectional dimension smaller than about 1.0 mm, these particles are not accounted for the purpose of this particular calculation.
In some embodiments, fiber webs having a value or range of surface density of particles described above can also have one or more of the values and ranges of the features and performance characteristics described below.
A fiber web described herein may be formed of fibers having an average diameter between about 0.1 microns and about 1.5 microns. For instance, the fiber web may include fibers (e.g., meltblown fibers) having an average diameter of between about 0.1 microns and about 1.3 microns, between about 0.1 microns and about 1.2 microns, between about 0.1 microns and about 1.0 microns, between about 0.25 microns and about 1.0 microns, between about 0.1 microns and about 0.8 microns, between about 0.1 microns and about 0.7 microns, between about 0.1 microns and about 0.6 microns, between about 0.1 microns and about 0.5 microns, or between about 0.1 microns and about 0.4 microns. In some embodiments, the average diameter of the fibers (e.g., meltblown fibers) in a fiber web may be about 1.5 microns or less, about 1.4 microns or less, about 1.3 microns or less, about 1.2 microns or less, about 1.1 microns or less, about 1.0 microns or less, about 0.9 microns or less, about 0.8 microns or less, about 0.7 microns or less, about 0.6 microns or less, about 0.5 microns or less, about 0.4 microns or less, or about 0.3 microns or less. In other embodiments, the average diameter of the fibers (e.g., meltblown fibers) in a fiber web may be greater than about 0.2 microns, greater than about 0.4 microns, greater than about 0.6 microns, greater than about 0.8 microns, greater than about 1.0 microns, or greater than about 1.2 microns. As used herein, fiber diameter is measured using scanning electron microscopy.
The fiber web can generally have any suitable thickness. In some embodiments, the fiber web has a thickness between about 0.0005 inches and about 0.040 inches. For instance, the thickness of the fiber web may be between about 0.001 inches and about 0.030 inches, between about 0.001 inches and about 0.020 inches, between about 0.002 inches and about 0.010 inches, or between about 0.002 inches and about 0.020 inches. In some instances, the thickness of the fiber web may be less than about 0.040 inches, less than about 0.030 inches, less than about 0.020 inches, or less than about 0.010 inches. In other instances, the thickness of the fiber web may be greater than about 0.0010 inches, greater than about 0.0050 inches, greater than about 0.010 inches, greater than about 0.020 inches, or greater than about 0.030 inches. As referred to herein, thickness is determined according to the standard ASTM D1777.
In certain embodiments, the fiber webs described herein have a relatively high consistency (low variability) of thickness across the fiber web. For instance, the variability of thickness across the fiber web may be about 6.0 standard deviations or less, about 5.5 standard deviations or less, about 5.0 standard deviations or less, about 4.5 standard deviations or less, about 4.0 standard deviations or less, about 3.5 standard deviations or less, about 3.0 standard deviations or less, about 2.5 standard deviations or less, about 2.0 standard deviations or less, about 1.5 standard deviations or less, about 1.0 standard deviations or less, or about 0.5 standard deviations or less. Other values of thickness variability are also possible. The variability of thickness may be determined by taking a statistically significant number of measurements across the fiber web.
The basis weight of the fiber web can typically be selected as desired. In some embodiments, the basis weight of the fiber web may be between about 1.0 g/m2 and about 100 g/m2. For instance, the basis weight of the fiber web may be between about 1.0 g/m2 and about 70 g/m2, between about 1.0 g/m2 and about 50 g/m2, between about 3.0 g/m2 and about 30 g/m2, or between about 3.0 g/m2 and about 20 g/m2. In some embodiments, the basis weight of the fiber web is greater than about 1 g/m2 (e.g., greater than about 10 g/m2, greater than about 25 g/m2), and/or less than about 100 g/m2 (e.g., less than about 90 g/m2, less than about 75 g/m2). As referred to herein, basis weight is determined according to ASTM D3776.
In certain embodiments, the fiber webs described herein have a relatively high consistency (low variability) of basis weight across the fiber web. For instance, the variability of basis weight across the fiber web may be about 6.0 standard deviations or less, about 5.5 standard deviations or less, about 5.0 standard deviations or less, about 4.5 standard deviations or less, about 4.0 standard deviations or less, about 3.5 standard deviations or less, about 3.0 standard deviations or less, about 2.5 standard deviations or less, about 2.0 standard deviations or less, about 1.5 standard deviations or less, about 1.0 standard deviations or less, or about 0.5 standard deviations or less. Other values of basis weight variability are also possible. The variability of basis weight may be determined by taking a statistically significant number of measurements across the fiber web.
In certain embodiments, the fiber webs described herein may have a relatively high surface area. In certain embodiments, a fiber web may have a surface area between about 0.1 m2/g and about 6.0 m2/g. For instance, a fiber web may have a surface area between about 0.1 m2/g and about 6.0 m2/g, between about 0.5 m2/g and about 6.0 m2/g, between about 1.0 m2/g and about 6.0 m2/g, between about 1.3 m2/g and about 6.0 m2/g, between about 1.5 m2/g and about 6.0 m2/g, between about 1.7 m2/g and about 6.0 m2/g, between about 1.8 m2/g and about 6.0 m2/g, between about 2.0 m2/g and about 6.0 m2/g, or between about 2.5 m2/g and about 6.0 m2/g. In some cases, a fiber web has a surface area of about 1.0 m2/g or greater, about 1.3 m2/g or greater, 1.5 m2/g or greater, about 1.6 m2/g or greater, about 1.7 m2/g or greater, about 1.8 m2/g or greater, about 1.9 m2/g or greater, about 2.0 m2/g or greater, about 2.1 m2/g or greater, 2.2 m2/g or greater, about 2.3 m2/g or greater, about 2.4 m2/g or greater, about 2.5 m2/g or greater, about 2.6 m2/g or greater, about 2.7 m2/g or greater, about 2.8 m2/g or greater, 2.9 m2/g or greater, or about 3.0 m2/g or greater. As determined herein, surface area is measured through use of a standard BET surface area measurement technique. The BET surface area is measured according to section 10 of Battery Council International Standard BCIS-03A, “Recommended Battery Materials Specifications Valve Regulated Recombinant Batteries”, section 10 being “Standard Test Method for Surface Area of Recombinant Battery Separator Mat”. Following this technique, the BET surface area is measured via adsorption analysis using a BET surface analyzer (e.g., Micromeritics Gemini III 2375 Surface Area Analyzer) with nitrogen gas; the sample amount is between 0.5 and 0.6 grams in a ¾″ tube; and, the sample is allowed to degas at 75 degrees C. for a minimum of 3 hours.
The mean pore size of the fiber web may also vary. In some embodiments, a fiber web has a mean pore size between about 1 micron and about 30 microns. For instance, the mean pore size may be between about 1 micron and about 20 microns, between about 1 micron and about 15 microns, between about 5 microns and about 15 microns, between about 1 micron and about 10 microns, or between about 5 microns and about 15 microns. In certain embodiments, the mean pore size may be less than about 30 microns, less than about 25 microns, less than about 20 microns, less than about 15 microns, less than about 10 microns, or less than about 5 microns. In other embodiments, the mean pore size may be greater than about 5 microns, greater than about 10 microns, greater than about 15 microns, greater than about 20 microns, greater than about 25 microns, or greater than about 30 microns. Other values and ranges of mean pore size are also possible. As used herein, mean pore size is measured according to the standard ASTM F-316-80 Method B, BS6410, e.g., using a Capillary Flow Porometer made by Porous Materials Inc.
Typically, the fiber web is formed of one or more polymers. Exemplary polymers include polyolefins (e.g., polypropylenes), polyesters (e.g., polybutylene terephthalate, polybutylene naphthalate), polyamides (e.g., nylons), polycarbonates, polyphenylene sulfides, polystyrenes, polyurethanes (e.g., thermoplastic polyurethanes). Optionally, the polymer(s) may contain fluorine atoms. Examples of such polymers include PVDF and PTFE. Examples of specific polymers that may be used include a polypropylene manufactured by LyondellBasell (MF650Y), a polypropylene manufactured by Total Petrochemicals (3962), a polypropylene manufactured by Exxon (PP3546G and ACHV6936G1 Metocene PP), a polypropylene manufactured by Borealis (HL512FB), a polyester (PBT) manufactured by Ticona (HB85151M1 CX2008) and a nylon manufactured by BASF (Ultramid B3SQ661). Other polymers suitable for use in an extrusion process can also be used.
In some embodiments, the fiber web includes one or more additives such as a binder, a lubricant, a slip agent, a surfactant, a coupling agent, a crosslinking agent, amongst others. In certain instances, one or more additives can be used to reduce or eliminate the number of polymeric particles formed on or in a fiber web.
Generally, the fiber web includes a small weight percentage of an additive. For example, the fiber web may include less than about 10%, less than about 8%, less than about 6%, less than about 5%, or less than about 4% of an additive. In some cases, the fiber web may include between about 1% and about 10%, between about 1% and about 8%, between about 1% and about 5% of an additive, or between about 1% and about 2.5% of an additive. In certain embodiments, the fiber web may include less than about 5%, less than about 3%, less than about 2%, or less than about 1% of a fatty acid additive as described below. In some embodiments, the additive may be added to the polymer material used to form the fibers when the polymeric material is in a molten (e.g., melted) state. In other embodiments, the additive coats the fibers after the fibers have been formed.
In some embodiments, a fiber web may include an additive (e.g., a slip agent or other type of additive) in the form of a lipid. In some cases, the additive comprises a fatty acid (e.g., a saturated fatty acid, an unsaturated fatty acid, a mono-unsaturated fatty acid, a poly-unsaturated fatty acid). In certain embodiments, the fatty acid includes an amide group (e.g., a fatty acid amide). Non-limiting examples of fatty acid amides include stearamide, behenamide, erucamide, N-(2-hdriethyl) erucamide, lauramide, N,N′-ethylene-bis-oleamide, N,N′-ethylene bissteamide, oleamide, oleyl palmitamide, stearyl erucamide, tallow amide, arachidonylethanolamide, N-arachidonylmaleimide, mixtures thereof, and derivatives thereof.
Examples of specific additives that may be used include an additive provided by Standridge Color Corp., having a supplier part no.: 22686, and an additive containing provided by Standridge Color Corp., having a supplier part no. 10SAM1044.
In certain embodiments, the additive is in the form of a fatty acid having a Cn (carbon) chain, where n is an integer. In some cases, n is 2 or greater, 4 or greater, 6 or greater, 8 or greater, 10 or greater, 12 or greater, 14 or greater, 16 or greater, 18 or greater, 20 or greater, 22 or greater, 24 or greater, 26 or greater, 28 or greater, 30 or greater, 32 or greater, 34 or greater, 36 or greater, 38 or greater, or 40 or greater. In other cases, n is less than or equal to 50, less than or equal to 45, less than or equal to 40, less than or equal to 35, less than or equal to 40, less than or equal to 35, less than or equal to 30, less than or equal to 25, less than or equal to 20, less than or equal to 15, less than or equal to 10, or less than or equal to 5.
The fiber webs described herein may have various performance characteristics. In some cases, the fiber webs have performance characteristics that enable them to be suitable for use as filter media.
In some embodiments, methods described herein for forming meltblown fibers can result in a fiber web having a relatively low air permeability. For instance, the air permeability of a fiber web may be less than about 1,800 ft3/min/ft2 (CFM), less than about 1,500 CFM, less than about 1,300 CFM, less than about 1,000 CFM, less than about 900 CFM, less than about 800 CFM, less than about 750 CFM, less than about 700 CFM, less than about 600 CFM, less than about 500 CFM, less than about 400 CFM, less than about 300 CFM, less than about 200 CFM, less than about 100 CFM, or less than about 50 CFM. In general, however, the air permeability of the fiber web can vary between about 10 CFM and about 1800 CFM (e.g., between about 10 CFM and about 1,500 CFM, between about 10 CFM and about 1,000 CFM, between about 10 CFM and about 750 CFM, between about 40 CFM and about 750 CFM, between about 10 CFM and about 600 CFM, between about 10 CFM and about 500 CFM, between about 10 CFM and about 400 CFM, between about 10 CFM and about 300 CFM, between about 10 CFM and about 200 CFM, between about 10 CFM and about 100 CFM, or between about 10 CFM and about 50 CFM). Other ranges are also possible. As used herein, air permeability is measured according to the standard ASTM D737-75.
The fiber webs described herein may have different ranges of NaCl particle filtration efficiencies. The NaCl particle filtration efficiency is [1−(C/C0)]*100%, where C is the NaCl particle concentration after passage through the fiber web and C0 is the NaCl particle concentration before passage through the filter. To measure NaCl particle filtration efficiency, a 100 cm2 surface area of the fiber web can be tested with NaCl (sodium chloride) particles having a 0.26 micron mass mean diameter with a geometric standard deviation less than 1.83, a concentration of 15 to 20 mg/cm3, and a face velocity of 5.3 cm/s by a TSI 8130 CertiTest™ automated filter testing unit from TSI, Inc.
equipped with a sodium chloride generator. The instrument measures a pressure drop (e.g., an airflow resistance) across the fiber web and the resultant penetration value on an instantaneous basis at a flow rate less than or equal to 115 liters per minute (lpm). Instantaneous readings can be defined as 1 pressure drop/penetration measurement. This test is described in ASTM D2 986-91.
A fiber web described herein may have a NaCl particle filtration efficiency between about 0.0001% and about 99.97%. For instance, the NaCl particle filtration efficiency may be between about 0.001% and about 99.97%, between about 0.01% and about 99.97%, between about 0.1% and about 99.97%, between about 1% and about 99.97%, between about 10.0% and about 99.97%, between about 40.0% and about 99.97%, between about 60.0% and about 99.97%, or between about 85.0% and about 99.97%. In some cases, the NaCl particle filtration efficiency is greater than about 10.0%, greater than about 20.0%, greater than about 30.0%, greater than about 40.0%, greater than about 50.0%, greater than about 60.0%, greater than about 70.0%, greater than about 80.0%, greater than about 90.0%, greater than about 95.0%, greater than about 97.0%, greater than about 98.0%, greater than about 99.0%, greater than about 99.5%, greater than about 99.9%, or greater than about 99.97%. Other ranges and values of NaCl particle filtration efficiency are also possible.
In some cases, a fiber web described herein may have an airflow resistance between about 0.1 mm H2O and about 50.0 mm H2O. For instance, the air flow resistance may be between about 0.1 mm H2O and about 40.0 mm H2O, between about 0.1 mm H2O and about 30.0 mm H2O, between about 0.1 mm H2O and about 20.0 mm H2O, between about 0.1 mm H2O and about 10.0 mm H2O, between about 0.3 mm H2O and about 5.0 mm H2O, between about 0.3 mm H2O and about 3.5 mm H2O, between about 0.3 mm H2O and about 3.0 mm H2O, between about 0.1 mm H2O and about 2.5 mm H2O, or between about 0.1 mm H2O and about 2.0 mm H2O. In some cases, the air flow resistance of a fiber web is less than about 50.0 mm H2O, less than about 40.0 mm H2O, less than about 30.0 mm H2O, less than about 20.0 mm H2O, less than about 10.0 mm H2O, less than about 5.0 mm H2O, or less than about 2.5 mm H2O. In other cases, the air flow resistance of a fiber web is greater than about 1.0 mm H2O, greater than about 2.5 mm H2O, greater than about 5.0 mm H2O, greater than about 10.0 mm H2O, greater than about 20.0 mm H2O, greater than about 30.0 mm H2O, or greater than about 40.0 mm H2O. Other ranges and values of air flow resistance are also possible. As used herein, air flow resistance is measured according to the standard ASTM D2 986-91 as described above.
It should be understood that the fiber webs described herein having the values and ranges of the features and performance characteristics described above may be formed using different combinations of the parameters described above to control fiber formation during an extrusion process. For example, in some embodiments, a method involving subjecting the polymeric material used to form the fibers to a dwell time of less than about 85 minutes, and using an extruder barrel having an inner diameter of about 4 inches or less, may lead to fibers having small diameters (e.g., average diameter of about 1.0 microns or less, about 0.8 microns or less, or about 0.6 microns or less), fiber webs having relatively high surface areas (e.g., about 1.8 m2/g or greater, about 2.0 m2/g or greater, or about 2.2 m2/g or greater), and/or to fiber webs having relatively low amounts of polymer degradation (e.g., a surface density of polymeric particles of less than about 5.0 particles/in2, less than about 3.0 particles/in2, less than about 2.0 particles/in2, less than about 1.6 particles/in2, less than about 1.0 particles/in2, or less than about 0.8 particles/in2, less than about 0.5 particles/in2, or less than about 0.3 particles/in2, wherein each of the particles has a largest cross-sectional dimension of 1.0 mm or greater). In other embodiments, a method of forming fibers involving subjecting the polymeric material used to form the fibers to a processing space having a volume less than about 25,000 cm3, less than about 15,000 cm3, or less than about 9,000 cm3 may lead to fibers and/or fiber webs having these characteristics.
In certain embodiments, a fiber web described herein may be combined with one or more other components such as a substrate and/or a scrim, optionally with an adhesive. Examples of substrates, scrims and adhesives are described in U.S. Publication No. 2009/0120048, filed Nov. 7, 2008, and entitled “Meltblown Filter Medium”, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety for all purposes.
In some cases, a fiber web or a composite including a fiber web can be charged. In general, any of a variety of techniques can be used to charge the fiber web and or a composite including the fiber web to form an electret web. Examples include AC and/or DC corona discharge. In some embodiments, the composite is subjected to a discharge of at least 1 kV/cm (e.g., at least 5 kV/cm, at least 10 kV/cm), and/or at most 30 kV/cm (e.g., at most 25 kV/cm, at most 20 kV/cm). For example, in certain embodiments, the composite can be subjected to a discharge of from 1 kV/cm to 30 kV/cm (e.g., from 5 kV/cm to 25 kV/cm, from 10 kV/cm to 20 kV/cm). Exemplary processes are disclosed, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 5,401,446, which, to the extent it is not inconsistent with the present disclosure, is incorporated herein by reference.
In some embodiments, a fiber web described herein can be a part of a filter element. Examples of filter elements include gas turbine filter elements, heavy duty air filter elements, automotive air filter elements, HVAC air filter elements, HEPA filter elements, vacuum bag filter elements, fuel filter elements, and oil filter elements. Such filter elements can be incorporated into corresponding filter systems (gas turbine filter systems, heavy duty air filter systems, automotive air filter systems, HVAC air filter systems, HEPA filter systems, vacuum bag filter systems, fuel filter systems, and oil filter systems). Vacuum filter bag systems are commonly used in home vacuum cleaners. In such embodiments, a filter medium can optionally be prepared by coating a paper with the meltblown material. In certain embodiments, a filter medium can be prepared using a wet laid or dry laid product (e.g., cellulose, polymer, glass). A filter medium can optionally be pleated into any of a variety of configurations (e.g., panel, cylindrical). Examples of filter media are described in more detail in U.S. Publication No. 2009/0120048, filed Nov. 7, 2008, and entitled “Meltblown Filter Medium”, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety for all purposes.
The following examples are exemplary and not intended as limiting.
Examples 1-10 show that various process parameters of an extrusion process can be varied to form fiber webs having small fiber diameters, high surface area, low air permeabilities, and/or low levels of polymer degradation according to certain embodiments described herein.
A total of 80 experiments were conducted in which different fiber webs were formed with either polypropylene or polyester (polybutyleneterephthalate) fibers using a process similar to the one shown in
The resulting, non-coded, mathematical models were then placed into an Excel spreadsheet, where a simple mathematical equation function was utilized to render the predicted physical property values of fiber webs that may be produced using different processing conditions (e.g., varying the values for extruder barrel inner diameter, die body temperature and polymer throughput). The results of the calculations are shown in Tables 1-3.
For each of the Examples shown in Tables 1-3, the following processing conditions would be used: extruder temperature profile (ramping) of 300° F., 325° F., 350° F., 375° F., 400° F., 425° F., 450° F.; the process air temperature being the same as that of the die body temperature; a process air setting of 3150 lbs/hr; a die to collector distance of 8.0 inches; a quench air rate of 225 lbs/hr; and a vacuum level of 17,500 ft3.
Examples 1-3 show that by reducing the extruder barrel inner diameter, extruder barrel length and conduit diameter, and increasing the polymer throughput, the dwell times of the polymer in the processing space can be reduced. The surface density of particles of degraded polymer in fiber webs produced by processes under such conditions would be reduced compared to that of Comparative Example 1, where the dwell time is relatively higher. Examples 1-3 also show that by decreasing the volume of the processing space (e.g., by reducing the extruder barrel length and conduit diameter), relatively high throughputs can be used and can be used to form fiber media having similar performance characteristics (e.g., air permeability) as media formed by the processing conditions shown for Comparative Example 1 (e.g., lower throughputs but higher processing space volumes). Higher throughputs may result in lower manufacturing costs.
Examples 4-7 show that by reducing the extruder barrel inner diameter, extruder barrel length and conduit diameter, the dwell time of the polymer in the processing space can be reduced. The surface density of particles of degraded polymer in fiber webs produced by processes under such conditions would be reduced compared to that of Comparative Example 2, where the dwell time is relatively higher. The processing conditions shown in Examples 4-7 can also result in fiber webs having lower air permeabilities and higher surface areas. Smaller fiber diameters (Example 7) can also be produced.
Examples 8-10 show that by reducing the extruder barrel inner diameter, extruder barrel length and conduit diameter, the dwell time of the polymer in the processing space can be reduced. The surface density of particles of degraded polymer in fiber webs produced by processes under such conditions would be reduced compared to that of Comparative Example 2, where the dwell time is relatively higher. The processing conditions shown in Examples 8-10 can also result in fiber webs having lower air permeabilities, higher surface areas, and smaller fiber diameters.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/971,594, filed Dec. 10, 2010, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3353682 | Pall et al. | Nov 1967 | A |
| 3849241 | Butin et al. | Nov 1974 | A |
| 4102785 | Head et al. | Jul 1978 | A |
| 4622259 | McAmish et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
| 4824451 | Vogt et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
| 4925601 | Vogt et al. | May 1990 | A |
| 5108474 | Reidy et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
| 5108827 | Gessner | Apr 1992 | A |
| 5149576 | Potts et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5178931 | Perkins et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5238474 | Kahlbaugh et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5240479 | Bachinski | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5306321 | Osendorf | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5401446 | Tsai et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5496507 | Angadjivand et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5580459 | Powers et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5582907 | Pall | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5620785 | Watt et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5647881 | Zhang et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5665803 | Nohr | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5672188 | Choi | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5672399 | Kahlbaugh et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5702616 | Degen et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5783503 | Gillespie et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5785725 | Cusick et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5786065 | Annis et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5804512 | Lickfield et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5935883 | Pike | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5955174 | Wadsworth et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5993501 | Cusick et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6034008 | Lim et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6113784 | Stoyell et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6120939 | Whear et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6123752 | Wu et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6171369 | Schultink et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6171684 | Kahlbaugh et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6193773 | Schlor et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6261979 | Tanaka et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6267252 | Amsler | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6315806 | Torobin et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6372004 | Schultink et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6422396 | Li et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6428610 | Tsai et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6517612 | Crouch et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6554881 | Healey | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6579350 | Doherty | Jun 2003 | B2 |
| 6603054 | Chen et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
| 6743273 | Chung et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6746517 | Benson et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6759356 | Myers | Jul 2004 | B1 |
| 6858057 | Healey | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6872311 | Koslow | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6924028 | Chung et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6936554 | Singer et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
| 6955775 | Chung et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
| 6986804 | Dominiak et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 7008465 | Graham et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7070640 | Chung et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7137510 | Klein et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
| 7144533 | Koslow | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7179317 | Chung et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7235122 | Bryner et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7309372 | Kahlbaugh et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 7314497 | Kahlbaugh et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| 7316723 | Chung et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| 7318852 | Chung et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| 7390760 | Chen et al. | Jun 2008 | B1 |
| 7597773 | Kume et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
| 7645312 | Hamlin et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
| 7918913 | Kalayci et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7985344 | Dema et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 7993427 | Hassmann et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8142535 | Grove | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8545587 | Guimond et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8608817 | Wertz et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8679218 | Guimond et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
| 8950587 | Thomson et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
| 8962501 | Johnson et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
| 8986432 | Wertz et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 9283501 | Wertz et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
| 9694306 | Anantharamaiah et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
| 20010035094 | Takagaki et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20010045086 | Cox et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20020013112 | Bontaites et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020056684 | Klein | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020083837 | Doherty | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020193553 | Qin et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030003834 | Berrigan et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030010210 | Kawano et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030057613 | Bansal et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030106294 | Chung et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030150199 | Tanaka et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030168401 | Koslow | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030177909 | Koslow | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030196963 | Koslow | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030196964 | Koslow | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030201231 | Koslow | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030203696 | Healey | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030205529 | Koslow | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030205530 | Koslow | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030205531 | Koslow | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030211802 | Keck et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030213750 | Koslow | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030220039 | Chen et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20040038014 | Schaefer et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040060268 | Chung et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040060269 | Chung et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040083695 | Schultink et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040112023 | Choi | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040116028 | Bryner | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040123572 | Chung et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040135274 | Matsuda et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040163540 | Mori et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040187454 | Chung et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040211160 | Rammig et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040226886 | Hester et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040255783 | Graham et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040266300 | Isele et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050006303 | Sanders | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050079379 | Wadsworth et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050109393 | Anderson | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050109554 | Ishikawa et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050109557 | Dravet et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050136292 | Mariani et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050148261 | Close et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050193696 | Muller et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050217226 | Sundet et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050240517 | Wolzenski et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050241598 | Ezaki | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050250726 | Krieg et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050266760 | Chhabra et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060000196 | Beier et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060084341 | Bodaghi et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060096260 | Bryner et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060096932 | Dema et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060137317 | Bryner et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060137318 | Lim et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060169144 | Forslund | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060230731 | Kalayci | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060292947 | LaVietes et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070021021 | Verdegan et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070054579 | Baker et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070065643 | Kopacz et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070074628 | Jones et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070075015 | Bates et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070084786 | Smithies | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070125700 | Ding et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070138698 | Gerndt et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070190319 | Kalayci | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070264520 | Wood et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070271883 | Chung et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070283808 | Chung et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080017038 | Wu | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080022643 | Fox et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080026659 | Brandner et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080026661 | Fox et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080032110 | Wood et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080060328 | Devine | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080105626 | Jones et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080108265 | Pourdeyhimi et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080110822 | Chung et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080134652 | Lim et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080160856 | Chen et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080227919 | Li et al. | Sep 2008 | A9 |
| 20080302242 | Schelling et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20080318014 | Angadjivand et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090120048 | Wertz | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090120868 | Huppchen et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090209158 | Richeson | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090261035 | Arora et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090266759 | Green | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20100000411 | Wertz et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100024695 | Difrancia | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100031618 | Grove, III | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100044289 | Koslow | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100282682 | Eaton et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100285101 | Moore et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100297720 | Medoff et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100323573 | Chu et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110079553 | Thomson et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110139706 | Kalayci et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110147301 | Johnson et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110147976 | Wertz et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110151737 | Moore et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110259813 | Wertz et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20120152821 | Cox et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120152824 | Cox et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120318754 | Cox et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20140346107 | Anantharamaiah et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20150182885 | Thomson et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20150182893 | Godsay et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20160184751 | Wertz et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 1275923 | Dec 2000 | CN |
| 10 2005 055 607 | Mar 2007 | DE |
| 20 2005 019 004 | Apr 2007 | DE |
| 10 2005 059 214 | Oct 2007 | DE |
| 10 2006 017 553 | Dec 2007 | DE |
| 20 2007 015 994 | Jan 2008 | DE |
| 0 462 574 | Dec 1991 | EP |
| 1 048 335 | Nov 2000 | EP |
| 1 236 494 | Sep 2002 | EP |
| 1 048 335 | Apr 2005 | EP |
| 1 721 555 | Nov 2006 | EP |
| 1 775 006 | Apr 2007 | EP |
| 1 795 248 | Mar 2008 | EP |
| 1 483 039 | Apr 2008 | EP |
| 2008-095266 | Apr 2008 | JP |
| WO 9831060 | Jul 1998 | WO |
| WO 0002006 | Jan 2000 | WO |
| WO 0198574 | Dec 2001 | WO |
| WO 0220668 | Mar 2002 | WO |
| WO 03064006 | Aug 2003 | WO |
| WO 03064013 | Aug 2003 | WO |
| WO 2004028662 | Apr 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004069378 | Aug 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004112937 | Dec 2004 | WO |
| 2005034659 | Apr 2005 | WO |
| WO 2006030407 | Mar 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006049664 | May 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006053295 | May 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006071979 | Jul 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006071980 | Jul 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006096180 | Sep 2006 | WO |
| WO 2007024445 | Mar 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007041310 | Apr 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007041311 | Apr 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007068302 | Jun 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007068408 | Jun 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007068444 | Jun 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007076015 | Jul 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007112443 | Oct 2007 | WO |
| WO 2008011450 | Jan 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008016771 | Feb 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008057397 | May 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008057431 | May 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008066813 | Jun 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008150548 | Dec 2008 | WO |
| WO 2009062009 | May 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009085679 | Jul 2009 | WO |
| WO 2010101640 | Sep 2010 | WO |
| WO 2011058118 | May 2011 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Chung, Extrusion of Polymers Theory & Practice, 2nd Edition, Chapter 2, pp. 13-57 (Year: 2010). |
| John Wiley & Sons, Inc. MP Groover, Fundamentals of Modern Manufacturing, Slide 4, “Extrusion Die for Solid Cross Section”. (Year: 2005). |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/971,456, filed Dec. 17, 2010, Wertz et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/984,406, filed Dec. 30, 2015, Wertz et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/971,539, filed Dec. 17, 2010, Cox et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/584,155, filed Dec. 29, 2014, Thomson et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/528,796, filed Jun. 20, 2012, Cox et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/091,951, filed May 24, 2013, Anantharamaiah et al. |
| PCT/US2008/082759., Aug. 4, 2009, International Search Report and Written Opinion. |
| PCT/US2008/082759, May 20, 2010, International Preliminary Report on Patentability. |
| EP11775517.3, Oct. 9, 2013, Extended European Search Report. |
| PCT/US2011/034074, Jul. 11, 2011, International Search Report and Written Opinion. |
| PCT/US2011/034074, Nov. 8, 2012, International Preliminary Report on Patentability. |
| PCT/US2011/065499, Apr. 20, 2012, International Search Report and Written Opinion. |
| PCT/US2011/065499, Jun. 27, 2013, International Preliminary Report on Patentability. |
| PCT/US2011/054898, Feb. 27, 2012, International Search Report and Written Opinion. |
| PCT/US2011/054898, Feb. 27, 2014, International Preliminary Report on Patentability. |
| PCT/US2013/046746, Nov. 5, 2013, International Search Report and Written Opinion. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2008/082759 dated Aug. 4, 2009. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for Application No. PCT/US2008/082759 dated May 20, 2010. |
| Extended European Search Report for EP11775517.3 dated Oct. 9, 2013. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2011/034074 dated Jul. 11, 2011. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2011/034074 dated Nov. 8, 2012. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2011/065499 dated Apr. 20, 2012. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for Application No. for PCT/US2011/065499 dated Jun. 27, 2013. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2011/054898 dated Feb. 27, 2012. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for Application No. for PCT/US2011/054898 dated Feb. 27, 2014. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2013/046746 dated Nov. 5, 2013. |
| [No Author Listed] Polymer Degradation and Stability Research Developments. Albertov, Ed. 2007. Nova Science Publishers. Book Description and Table of Contents. Accessed from <https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?products_id=5855> on Sep. 17, 2015. |
| Berkalp, Air Permeability & Porosity in Spun-laced Fabrics. Fibres and Textiles in Eastern Europe. 2006; 14(3): 81-5. |
| Bresee et al. Influence of Processing Conditions on Melt Blown Web Structure: Part 1—DCD. INJ Spring 2004:49-55. |
| Bresee et al. Influence of Processing Conditions on Melt Blown Web Structure: Part 2—Primary Airflow Rate. INJ Summer 2005:11-8. |
| Bresee et al. Influence of Processing Conditions on Melt Blown Web Structure: Part 3—Water Quench. INJ Winter 2005:27-35. |
| Chung, Extrusion of Polymers, Theory and Practice. 2nd Edition; Sample Chapter 2: Physical Description of Single-Screw Extrusion. Hanser Publishers, Munich: 46 pages. 2010. |
| Dahiya et al., Melt Blown Technology. Apr. 2004. 13 pages. |
| Dutton, Overview and Analysis of the Meltblown Process and Parameters. NC State University, College of textiles. Journal of Textile and Apparel, Technology and Management. 2008;6(1):1-25. |
| Ellison et al., Melt blown nanofibers: Fiber diameter distributions and onset of fiber breakup. Polymer. May 21, 2007;48(11):3306-16. |
| Grafe et al., Polymeric Nanofibers and Nanofiber Webs: A New Class of Nonwovens. INJ Spring 2003: 51-5. |
| Keith et al., The Surface Area of Fibrous Filters. Tobacco Science. 1977;68-72. Accessed Sep. 19, 2013. |
| Nayak, Fabrication and characterization of polypropylene nanofibres by melt electrospinning and meltblowing. Doctoral Thesis. RMIT University, School of Fashion and Textiles. Mar. 2012. |
| Podgórski et al., Application of nanofibers to improve the filtration efficiency of the most penetrating aerosol particles in fibrous filters. Chem Eng Sci. Oct. 2006;61(20):6804-15. |
| Shin et al., A Fundamental Investigation of the Formation and Properties of Electrospun Fibers. National Textile Center Annual Report. Nov. 2001; M98-D01: 9 pages. |
| Warner et al., A Fundamental Investigation of the Formation and Properties of Electrospun Fibers. National Textile Center Annual Report. Nov. 1999; M98-D01: 10 pages. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20160158677 A1 | Jun 2016 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 12971594 | Dec 2010 | US |
| Child | 14874561 | US |
