Patent Grant
8746357
The invention relates generally to suppression of exothermic reactions and particularly to suppression of fires.
Having an effective and reliable strategy for fire safety is of the utmost importance, particularly in isolated and enclosed environments, such as in terrestrial vehicles and aircraft, and partial-gravity conditions, such as in spacecraft and extraterrestrial manned enclosures. For example, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) uses carbon dioxide (CO2) for fire suppression on the International Space Station (ISS) and halon chemical extinguishers on the Space Shuttle.
While each of these technologies is effective, they also have drawbacks.
The toxicity of carbon dioxide (threshold limit value (TLV)=5000 ppm) requires that the crew wear breathing apparatus when the extinguishers are deployed. Furthermore, the subsequent removal of the discharge CO2 will tax the spacecraft's Environmental Control and Life Support System (ECLSS).
Halon use in future spacecraft has been taken out of consideration by NASA out of observance of the international protocols against substances that destroy the ozone layer. Gaseous agents used in halon fire-fighting systems have been associated with depletion of the ozone layer, and their use is being phased out around the world. A timetable for replacement was developed as part of the Montreal Protocol, which has encouraged a significant effort here and abroad to identify replacement agents that are as effective as halons, but do not impact the environment. To date, this effort has focused on near-term substitution of other halocarbon compounds, including halochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs), halofluorocarbons (HFCs) and perfluorocarbons. Although halon deployed in low earth orbit (LEO) or farther out will not come into contact with the Earth's ozone layer, NASA protocols require de-orbiting of a spacecraft after deployment of a halon extinguisher because the ECLSS systems have no means of scrubbing bromofluorocarbons. Another issue is the loss of fire protection once the halon system has been discharged.
An important area of research on halon replacements has been in the use of fine water mists for fire suppression. Fine water mist can suppress fires by attacking all three legs of the “fire triangle”: heat, radiation, and fuel source. Water mist can take away heat from the fire as both sensible and latent heat. Perhaps surprisingly, research has shown that the sensible heat effects of water are as significant as the latent heat. However, the heat of vaporization is still important in removing energy from the fire. The steam produced can then act as an inerting agent, or diluent, to inhibit fire propagation. Finally, water mist can act to wet surfaces, which reduces the volatilization of solids and thus the amount of fuel present. An additional mechanism by which water mist can inhibit fires is through the attenuation of infrared radiation. A water aerosol becomes an optically dense medium that prevents the infrared heating of unburned surfaces by burning surfaces. Also, the nitrogen gas used in the generation and propulsion of the fine water mist displaces the oxygen, thereby removing a combustion component from the fire.
Fine water mists hold considerable promise as fire suppression agents. Important design criterion for fine water mist extinguishers include the droplet properties of size and momentum, which are in large part controlled by the atomizer/nozzle design. Engineering of fine mist systems for specific applications is needed, because development of fine mist technology is in an early stage.
These and other needs are addressed by the various embodiments and configurations of the present invention. The present invention is directed to a suppression system and method using a separation member in a containment vessel to separate a carrier/atomization gas from a suppression liquid.
In a first embodiment, a method for suppressing an exothermic reaction includes the steps:
(a) directing an outlet of a suppression device towards an exothermic reaction, such as a fire or deflagration;
(b) opening a valve to permit a suppression liquid and carrier gas in a containment vessel to flow from the containment vessel, the liquid and carrier gas being located in the containment vessel and separated from one another by a movable and/or deformable separation member (such as a piston or membrane);
(c) after the liquid and carrier gas flow from the containment vessel, mixing the liquid and carrier gas to form a suppression fluid, the suppression fluid being in the form of droplets of the liquid dispersed in the carrier gas; and
(d) discharging the suppression fluid in a direction of the exothermic reaction.
In another embodiment, a suppression system includes:
(a) a containment vessel comprising a carrier gas and a suppression liquid;
(b) a separation member dividing the containment vessel into first and second portions, the first portion comprising the gas and the second portion the liquid, wherein the separation member is movably disposed in the containment vessel and/or shape changing in response to pressure exerted by the gas;
(c) a nozzle assembly to mix the liquid and gas, when removed from the containment vessel, disperse the liquid as droplets in the gas, and discharge a suppression fluid comprising the droplets entrained in the gas; and
(d) an actuator to initiate removal of the gas and liquid from the containment vessel.
The present invention can provide a number of advantages depending on the particular configuration. By way of example, the suppression system can be a portable fire extinguisher UDOS (Universal Discharge Orientation System) that can extinguish fires aboard space-craft in low gravity or microgravity environments or in vehicles, even when the vehicle is upside down. The suppression system is preferably a water mist system that can operate in microgravity, in any gravitational field, or at any orientation. The UDOS can have many desirable features, including a low weight and a totally self-contained and modular design. There commonly is no complex piping to thread through a crowded habitation module and mounting is simplified. A perforated flow tube containing multiple holes allows the liquid to enter the tube from anywhere in the contained liquid volume. This is desirable, since segments of the separation member can be forced against a single opening with the suppression liquid (e.g., water) still remaining in the volume during discharge. Use of a perforated tube allows water to flow almost anywhere within the bladder and still exit via the perforated tube. The separation member separates the water and gas constituents but can still allow the pressure in the gas phase to be successfully transferred to the water/liquid phase to discharge the contents and facilitate the generation of fine water mist droplets. This can remove the gravity requirement of a typical fire extinguisher, which suffers operational problems when discharged on its side. The system can exploit the slow pressure decay of the gas phase during discharge to force the flow of water/liquid from the containment vessel and allow the system contents to be depleted effectively in all orientations. This type of system can be deployed in aircraft, spacecraft, and other vehicles without concern for system orientation with respect to gravity. The system can use a check valve and aspirating venturi to blend the liquid with the propellant/atomization gas. The body housing the venturi can be configured to use minimal turns and length of flow path from inlet to outlet. This keeps the gas and liquid phases well-mixed in the flow. The generation of fine water mist can be enhanced by the presence of a uniform distribution of small bubbles of gas in a continuous flow of water.
These and other advantages will be apparent from the disclosure of the invention(s) contained herein.
“At least one”, “one or more”, and “and/or” are open-ended expressions that are both conjunctive and disjunctive in operation. For example, each of the expressions “at least one of A, B and C”, “at least one of A, B, or C”, “one or more of A, B, and C”, “one or more of A, B, or C” and “A, B, and/or C” means A alone, B alone, C alone, A and B together, A and C together, B and C together, or A, B and C together.
The term “a” or “an” entity refers to one or more of that entity. As such, the terms “a” (or “an”), “one or more” and “at least one” can be used interchangeably herein. It is also to be noted that the terms “comprising”, “including”, and “having” can be used interchangeably.
The preceding is a simplified summary of the invention to provide an understanding of some aspects of the invention. This summary is neither an extensive nor exhaustive overview of the invention and its various embodiments. It is intended neither to identify key or critical elements of the invention nor to delineate the scope of the invention but to present selected concepts of the invention in a simplified form as an introduction to the more detailed description presented below. As will be appreciated, other embodiments of the invention are possible utilizing, alone or in combination, one or more of the features set forth above or described in detail below.
The first and second valves 108 and 112 are closed when the extinguisher is not in operation and opened when in operation. When the valves are opened, the pressure of the gas and gravity cause the piston to move downwardly, expelling liquid through the hose 120. To make this possible, the gas is discharged through the hose 116 at a rate low enough to maintain a discharge pressure against the liquid. When discharged from the vessel 104, the carrier gas and suppression liquid are maintained in isolation while flowing through their respective hoses 116 and 120. When the gas and liquid reach the nozzle assembly 124, they are mixed together to produce atomized droplets of the liquid dispersed in the carrier gas. The atomized liquid is then discharged from the nozzle assembly 124 at a selected velocity in a cone-shaped pattern 132.
The carrier gas can be any suitable gas that is inert relative to the suppression liquid and substantially immiscible in the liquid under the conditions of the nozzle assembly. Suitable carrier gases include nitrogen, carbon dioxide, air, helium, argon, carbon monoxide, and mixtures thereof.
The carrier gas can be pre-pressured in the vessel 104 or generated rapidly during operation of the extinguisher. In the former case, the carrier gas is typically stored at a pressure ranging from about 100 to about 2500 psi and even more typically from about 300 to about 1200 psi. In the latter case, the carrier gas is generated by combustion of a solid or liquid propellant positioned in the upper half 104a of the vessel 104. Although the propellant can be any suitable material, the propellant is preferably selected from the group consisting of lead azide, sodium azide, and mixtures thereof.
The suppression liquid can be any liquid having a heat of vaporization sufficient to absorb the heat as it is generated by the exothermic reaction (e.g., fire, deflagration, or detonation) to be suppressed, a sufficient boiling point to remain in the liquid phase until vaporization by heat absorbtion, and a surface tension sufficient to form atomized liquid droplets. The liquid preferably has a heat of vaporization of at least about 500 cal/g and more preferably at least about 800 cal/g, a boiling point that is no less than about 50 degrees Celsius, more preferably no less than about 80 degrees Celsius, and even more preferably no less than about 90 degrees Celsius, and a surface tension of no more than about 0.06 lbs/ft. A particularly preferred suppression liquid is water. Water offers the added advantages of being cheap, widely available, environmentally acceptable, and nontoxic.
The liquid can include additives to enhance the ability of the liquid droplets to suppress the exothermic reaction, such as free radical interceptors. A preferred free radical interceptor is an alkali metal salt, including potassium bicarbonate, potassium carbonate, sodium bicarbonate, sodium carbonate, and mixtures thereof. The free radical interceptor should have a concentration in the liquid ranging from about 1% up to saturation.
The liquid can include additives to decrease the freezing point of the liquid for applications at low temperatures. As will be appreciated, the freezing point of water is about 0 degrees Celsius, which is above the system temperature in many applications. The liquid can include such freezing-point depressants as glycerine, propylene glycol, diethylene glycol, ethylene glycol, calcium chloride, and mixtures thereof.
The liquid can include other additives to alter the surface tension of the liquid droplets. For example, wetting agents are effective because they decrease the surface tension of the liquid, resulting in the generation of smaller droplets and thus increasing the amount of free surface available for heat absorption. Suitable wetting agents include surfactants.
The liquid can include additives to decrease friction loss in the hoses and nozzle assembly. Linear polymers (polymers that are a single, straight-line chemical chain with no branches) are the most effective in reducing turbulent frictional losses. Poly(ethylene oxide) is an effective polymer for reducing turbulent frictional losses in the liquid.
The nozzle assembly 124 includes a liquid-gas mixing device and an atomization device. The devices can be similar to the liquid atomizing device of U.S. Pat. No. 5,495,893 (which is incorporated herein by this reference), which uses supersonic and sonic fluid velocities to produce a shock wave that decreases the size of the droplets. Alternatively, the devices can be any other devices suitable for mixing and atomization.
The droplet sizes output by the nozzle assembly 124 are small enough to vaporize rapidly in response to heat absorption with sufficient mass to be distributed throughout a defined area. A variable to express the size distribution of the liquid droplets is the Sauter Mean Diameter (SMD). The SMD is the total volume of the liquid droplets divided by their total surface area. The SMD of the liquid droplets is preferably no more than about 150, more preferably no more than about 50, and even more preferably no more than about 30 microns.
The surface area of the droplets in the defined area is a function of the size distribution of the liquid droplets and the concentration of the liquid droplets in the defined area at a selected point in time. In most applications, the peak concentration of liquid droplets in the defined area preferably ranges from about 1.5 gal/1,000 ft3 to about 20 gal/1,000 ft3, more preferably from about 2 gal/1,000 ft3 to about 15 gal/1,000 ft3, and even more preferably from about 4 gal/1,000 ft3 to about 10 gal/1,000 ft3.
Based upon the liquid droplet size distribution and liquid droplet concentration in the defined area, the total surface area per unit volume of the liquid droplets in the defined area at the peak liquid droplet concentration is preferably at least about 75 m2/m3, more preferably at least about 100 m2/m3, and even more preferably at least about 150 m2/m3.
In another configuration, the piston 128 is replaced by a stationary, flexible membrane (not shown). The membrane can be an elastic material, such as an elastomer, and may or may not be permeable to the gas. The membrane is, however, impermeable to the liquid. The membrane is stationary in that its circumference is preferably immovably fixed to the interior surface of the vessel 104. When the second valve 112 is opened, the central portion of the membrane is able to stretch (much like an inflated balloon), in response to gas pressure, to extend substantially the entire length of the lower portion 104b of the vessel 104 to expel the liquid.
When the membrane is permeable to the gas, the gas can, over time, migrate through the membrane until a saturated concentration of gas is in the liquid. When the liquid flows out of the tank and the pressure drops, the dissolved gas molecules will rapidly enter the gas phase from the liquid phase, thereby facilitating liquid atomization. Stated another way, the dissolved gas molecules nucleate as small bubbles distributed substantially uniformly in the liquid phase and the bubbles rapidly expand to provide an additional mechanism for generating fine droplets, thereby enhancing droplet generation by the dispersed gas bubbles in the two-phase mixture. This effect is known as effervescence. An emulsifying aid, such as a surfactant or cosolvent, may be added to the liquid to increase the gas molecule solubility up to about 10 wt. %.
An extinguisher according to a second embodiment is shown in
The extinguisher 200 includes a nozzle assembly 204 and a containment vessel assembly 208. The vessel assembly 208 includes a containment vessel 210, a perforated flow tube 212, and an elastomeric membrane or bladder 216 surrounding and enclosing fully the flow tube 212. The membrane 216 divides the inner volume of the vessel 210 into a first (inner) region 220 containing the suppression liquid and a second (outer) region 224 containing the carrier gas.
The vessel assembly 208 can include a piston valve 230 to actuate liquid and gas flow through the upper portion of the tube 212, and the nozzle assembly a mixing and atomization device (not shown) in communication with the tube 212 and located at the top of the tank. The piston valve is actuated by movement of one or both of the handles 234 and 238.
The bladder can be any elastic and/or elastomeric material. Preferably, the bladder has a durometer between about 75 Shore 00 to about 20 Shore 00. Preferred bladder materials include silicone, latex, and ultra-soft Tygon™, with latex being preferred.
Perforations of the tube 212 along substantially the entire length and periphery of the tube provide for uniform and undisturbed liquid flow from the bladder and into the tube. The percentage of the surface area of the portion of the tube 212 positioned in the bladder 216 that is occupied by perforations is preferably at least about 5% and even more preferably ranges from about 10 to about 30%.
The handle subassembly 600 includes upper and lower handles 612 and 616 connected to a bracket 620. The bracket 620 is, in turn, connected to the valve subassembly 608. The upper handle 612 is movably engaged with the bracket 620 and includes a bearing member 624 that engages a manual release valve 628 of the valve subassembly 608, when the handle is moved towards the lower (stationary) handle 616.
With reference to
Additional details of the valve subassembly 608 will now be discussed with reference to
The first passageway 400 receives the release valve 628 and extends longitudinally through the body 704. A smaller diameter segment 424 receives the smaller diameter segment 420 of the release valve 628, while the distal portions 426 and 428 receive the distal portion 432 of the valve 628. As can be seen in
As can be seen in
The second passageway 404 intersects the third passageway 408. The second passageway 404 receives the venturi 728, which is in turn connected to the flow tube 212. The venturi is located in the body, preferably such that there are minimal turns and length to the flow path from inlet to outlet. Referring to
The third passageway 408 communicates with the second and fourth passageways and includes a plug 724 and check valve 720. The passageway 408 has a larger diameter than the check valve 720 to define an annulus 570 therebetween. The flow passage 574 through the check valve is in communication with the annulus 570 and annulus 562. The check valve 720 includes a movable member (not shown) that, when closed, blocks flow in either direction along the flow passage 574 and, when opened, permits flow in either direction along the flow passage 574. The spring pressure for the movable member of the check valve is very light, preferably no more than about 1 psi, since the primary function of the check valve is to inhibit backflow of the liquid to the gas reservoir section of the vessel. A preferred check valve 720 is a 10-32 THD or Barb —CKV manufactured by Beswick Engineering.
The fourth passageway 412 is in fluid communication with the gas in the vessel 208 and the third passageway 408. When not in use, the pressurized gas in the annulus 570 exerts a pressure against the movable check valve member that is opposed by an equal and opposite pressure exerted by the liquid in the bladder 216. Thus, the check valve is in the closed position.
The fifth and sixth passageways 450 and 454 receive, respectively, the gas fill port 712 and water fill port 708. The fifth passageway 450 is in fluid communication with the fourth passageway 412, while the sixth passageway 454 is in fluid communication with the second passageway 404. Each of the ports includes a check valve (not shown) that is closed except when a pressurized fluid flow is inputted into the port. The extinguisher is thus filled by first filling, via the port 708, the bladder with a predetermined volume of water. The filling procedure is completed by subsequently filling with gas the area of the vessel outside of the bladder until a predetermined pressure is realized. The pressure gauge 716 provides the pressure reading in the vessel. The pressure gauge is in fluid communication with the fourth passageway 412 (not shown).
The operation of the extinguisher of the third embodiment will now be discussed with reference to
An operator activates the extinguisher by gripping and squeezing the upper and lower handles 612 and 616 to move the upper handle towards the lower handle. In response, the bearing member 624 displaces the manual release valve 628 inwardly along the first passageway 400, bringing the ports 500a-d into fluid communication with the annulus 504. When not in operation, the liquid flows through the tube 212 and into the second passageway 404. Liquid flow into the third passageway 408 is blocked by the closed check valve 720 and flow through the proximal portions 532 and 536 of the first passageway is blocked by the valve portion 420. This is so because the ports are not in fluid communication with the annulus 504. When the valve 628 is displaced inwardly along the first passageway, the ports 500a-d move into the annulus 504. This displacement into the annulus 504 effectively releases pressure on the liquid and gas simultaneously with the gas pressure providing the motive force via the bladder to cause the liquid to flow from the vessel. The gas and liquid constituents can be mixed either at the nozzle or in the liquid and gas transfer conduits from the bladder to the nozzle.
In response, the liquid, under pressure from the gas outside of the bladder 216, flows (as shown by flow path arrow 580) into and through the venturi 728. During discharge, the static pressure of the liquid decreases as the liquid moves through the venturi throat. The reduced liquid pressure at the throat of the venturi causes a pressure differential across the aspirating tubes of the venturi, which displaces the moveable closure member of the check valve (not shown) and pulls the gas through the check valve and into the discharge. In other words, the liquid pressure at the throat is less than the pressure of the gas in the annulus 570, thereby causing the check valve closure member to move to the open position and gas to flow into the annulus 562 (as shown by flow path arrow 584) and into and through the aspirating tubes 550a-d (as shown by flow path arrow 588). The gas and liquid will thereby be mixed at the throat to form gas bubbles (the discontinuous phase) dispersed in the liquid (the continuous phase). As used herein, “continuous phase” refers to the phase constituting at least about 75% by volume of the fluid. As will be appreciated, the size of the carrier gas bubbles is related inversely to the velocity of the liquid past the tubes 550a-d and directly related to the diameters of the tubes. The velocity of the liquid shears carrier gas bubbles from the tubes, with the shear forces being increased at higher velocities. Preferably, the stored pressure of the gas and throat diameter are selected to provide a velocity of the liquid through the throat of at least about 50 ft/sec and even more preferably ranging from about 50 to about 300 ft/sec. The stored pressure of the gas preferably is at least about 150 psi and even more preferably ranges from about 300 to about 1200 psi, while the throat has an interior diameter of no more than about 0.2 inches and even more preferably ranging from about 0.08 to about 0.2 inches. The diameter of each tube 550 preferably ranges from about 0.02 to about 0.05 inches. After mixture, the mass ratio of the gas to the liquid is typically no more than about 0.05 to about 0.3 and even more preferably ranges from about 0.08 to about 0.20.
As shown by flow path arrow 592, the fluid mixture flows into the annulus 504 surrounding the proximal end of the release valve. Although the cross-sectional area of the annulus 504 normal to the direction of flow is more than the cross-sectional area normal to flow of the outlet passage between the annulus 504 and the venturi, the liquid phase remains the continuous phase while the gas phase remains the discontinuous phase. The fluid at the venturi outlet and in the annulus 504 is preferably from about 20 to about 70% by volume carrier gas.
The fluid then flows from the annulus 504, through the ports 500a-d, into the conduit 528. Each of the ports 500a-d typically have a diameter ranging from about 10 to about 60% of the diameter DC, or, in absolute terms, from about 0.01 to about 0.2 inches. Because the cross-sectional area of each port normal to the direction of fluid flow is less than the cross-sectional area normal to liquid flow at any other upstream location (except in some cases at the throat of the venturi), the ports cause the liquid droplets to accelerate and have a higher velocity in the conduit 528 than in the annulus 504. This velocity is commonly no more than about 1,000 ft/sec and no less than about 100 ft/sec.
Once in the conduit 528, the gas-containing liquid flows through the orifice plate 530 as shown in
Downstream of the conduit 528, the cross-sectional area of the passageway normal to the direction of flow progressively increases, with the passageway segment 416 having a larger diameter than the diameter DC, the passageway segment 532 a larger diameter than the passageway segment 416, and the passageway segment 536 a larger diameter than the passageway segment 532. As a result of the increase in the flow area, the droplet velocity will progressively decrease.
The deceleration of the droplets from a supersonic velocity to a sonic velocity decreases the size of the droplets, as a result of the pressure discontinuity from the resulting shock wave. In other words, the liquid droplets upstream of the shock wave have larger average, mean, and median sizes than the liquid droplets downstream of the shock wave. The distance from the aperture to the first passageway outlet should be sufficient to enable the shock wave to occur in the first passageway upstream of the outlet. Preferably, the distance from the aperture to the passageway outlet is at least twice the distance from the aperture to the point of formation of the shock wave.
The decreased liquid droplet size is believed to result from the liquid droplets having a Weber number that is no more than about 1.2. It is generally believed that the liquid droplets downstream of the shock wave have an average size that is no more than about 50% of the average size of the droplets upstream of the shock wave. The liquid droplets upstream of the shock wave preferably have an SMD of no more than about 160 microns and the liquid droplets downstream of the shock wave an SMD of no more than about 80 microns. The liquid droplets outputted from the first passageway preferably have a velocity of at least about 200 ft/sec.
In a preferred embodiment, the fluid next passes through the passages 808 in the nozzle plate 804 to realize further reduction in the droplet size as shown in
To suppress an exothermic reaction such as a fire or deflagration, the liquid droplets must be rapidly dispersed in the area of the reaction. The injection rate and velocity of the liquid droplets exiting the extinguisher can be important variables to the ability of the extinguisher to extinguish the reaction. The liquid droplet injection rate per unit volume of the reaction area preferably is at least about 1.5 l/sec/m3, more preferably at least about 3 l/sec/m3, and most preferably at least about 5 l/sec/m3. In most applications, the liquid droplet injection rate will preferably range from about 0.5 to about 10 l/min. The velocity of the liquid droplets exiting the first passageway outlet preferably ranges from about 100 ft/sec to about 500 ft/sec and more preferably from about 150 ft/sec to 300 ft/sec.
Another embodiment of the extinguisher is shown in
Various tests were performed to determine the efficacy of the extinguisher in suppressing fires. Two proof-of-concept test systems were conceived, built, and evaluated that separated liquid and gas components in a single storage tank so that the system could function under microgravity environments. Two design concepts were considered. One was a free piston concept, such as that of
The second concept shown in
Bladder materials evaluated were permeable to CO2 gas so that CO2 could dissolve into the liquid water, generating equilibrium with the gas phase in the single tank 1104. The decision to specify nitrogen as the preferred carrier gas allowed the consideration of a wider range of bladder materials.
One approach to inserting the bladder material into the relatively small hole in the top of a commercially available storage tank pressure vessel was to use elastic tubing for the bladder. To evaluate this design, ½″ diameter elastic tubing capable of expanding to 4-6″ in diameter was fitted over a perforated stand pipe and clamped at both ends. After inserting the flow tube 1108 into the tank 1104, the tubing was filled with water and stretched out to maintain containment of the water inside the tank, much like a constrained balloon. Multiple materials were tested for the bladder, including silicone, Latex, and ultra-soft Tygon®. Latex was the only tubing that expanded to the required diameter, and it held water for 3 months with minimal leakage. For this reason, Latex was used in the prototype system.
A concept nozzle design, similar to that of
The nozzle design that had a uniform discharge with small droplet size and minimal momentum was coupled to the system of
Using the system of
The prototype systems were found to effectively extinguish the fires. Both the nitrogen evaluation tests and the fire suppression validation tests are described below.
Multiple fire suppression tests were performed using nitrogen or carbon dioxide gas propellant with water using a fine water mist fire suppression system. In these tests, a 10′×10′×10′ free-standing fire test room was used with an oxygen-enhanced fire located at the center of the floor.
The pan that used to hold the fire is 18″ wide, 4.5″ deep, and has a 1.5″ platform around the edge. A hole was drilled at the base of the pan to allow excess water to drain from the pan. Along the edge of the pan two thermocouples were placed to aid in determining if the fire is extinguished. The oxygen gas was pumped through an oxygen service regulator to a flow meter, which is set to 20 scfh. Once through the regulator, an electrically actuated oxygen service ASCO solenoid valve with ½″ connections is used to allow oxygen flow to the fire pan. All of the plumbing is ¼″ tube except the ball valve and oxygen aspiration system.
The oxygen then enters a dispersion device. The dispersion device is a 1″ tube perforated with holes. 0.5 lbs of rags are bundled around and on top of the tube to fuel the fire. The tube is capped at the end opposite of the ¼″ tube inlet. Two thermocouples were placed above the fire to monitor fire intensity throughout testing.
The igniter is a piece of nichrome wire crimped onto a length of two-strand wire. One igniter is consumed during each fire test. The igniter is powered by 120 V activated by a mechanical relay with a 25 amp fuse to prevent blowing the main circuit. It is operated on a separate circuit. The relay switch is 1 second in duration. During the fire tests oxygen is allowed to flow for 10 sec. before the igniter is activated. The target fire is ignited and allowed to build to a specified intensity as measured by the thermocouples.
The fine water mist fire extinguisher is filled with carrier gas and water at a predetermined mass ratio (typically 0.15 parts carrier gas to one part water), which has been shown in earlier tests to be the optimal mix for a fine water mist fire suppression nozzle. In all of these tests the fires were successfully extinguished.
Table 1 shows that the carbon dioxide propellant was nominally quicker to extinguish the test fires in all tests. The tests were run at a starting pressure of 850 psi in the single storage container, which represents the condition where the CO2 propellant will be present in the storage tank in both the gas and liquid phases
Due to concerns with a build-up of CO2 concentration with the discharge of a fire extinguisher in small confined areas, nitrogen was selected as the carrier gas. Results that showed the capability of a nitrogen propellant configuration to successfully extinguish test fires reinforced this decision.
An open fire was suppressed by the system of
The system of
Following the fire evaluations, the fine water mists generated by several candidate nozzles were characterized in a configuration similar to that of
Volumetric flux in the nozzles is shown in the center graph of
A number of variations and modifications of the invention can be used. It would be possible to provide for some features of the invention without providing others.
For example in one alternative embodiment, the bladder is not elastic but a non-elastic material that folds to foster uniform compaction of the contained volume inside the vessel during discharge. Such a material does not stretch when the system is full of water and thereby avoids the elastic stress which may tear an elastic bladder, particularly where significant acceleration and deceleration occurs.
In another alternative embodiment, the extinguisher can switch between three modes of operation. These modes are inactive, active low momentum and active high momentum. In the low momentum mode, the output droplet size ranges from about 10 to about 50 microns and velocity from about 10 to about 100 m/s. In the high momentum mode, the output droplet size ranges from about 30 to about 80 microns and velocity from about 30 to about 200 m/s. The low momentum mode, for example, can be used to extinguish fires in confined or small enclosed areas, while the high momentum mode can be used to extinguish fires in unconfined or large enclosed areas. The switch between the low and high momentum modes can be effected, for example, using a variable pressure control to control the fluid pressure in the extinguisher.
The present invention, in various embodiments, includes components, methods, processes, systems and/or apparatus substantially as depicted and described herein, including various embodiments, subcombinations, and subsets thereof. Those of skill in the art will understand how to make and use the present invention after understanding the present disclosure. The present invention, in various embodiments, includes providing devices and processes in the absence of items not depicted and/or described herein or in various embodiments hereof, including in the absence of such items as may have been used in previous devices or processes, e.g., for improving performance, achieving ease and\or reducing cost of implementation.
The foregoing discussion of the invention has been presented for purposes of illustration and description. The foregoing is not intended to limit the invention to the form or forms disclosed herein. In the foregoing Detailed Description for example, various features of the invention are grouped together in one or more embodiments for the purpose of streamlining the disclosure. The features of the embodiments of the invention may be combined in alternate embodiments other than those discussed above. This method of disclosure is not to be interpreted as reflecting an intention that the claimed invention requires more features than are expressly recited in each claim. Rather, as the following claims reflect, inventive aspects lie in less than all features of a single foregoing disclosed embodiment. Thus, the following claims are hereby incorporated into this Detailed Description, with each claim standing on its own as a separate preferred embodiment of the invention.
Moreover, though the description of the invention has included description of one or more embodiments and certain variations and modifications, other variations, combinations, and modifications are within the scope of the invention, e.g., as may be within the skill and knowledge of those in the art, after understanding the present disclosure. It is intended to obtain rights which include alternative embodiments to the extent permitted, including alternate, interchangeable and/or equivalent structures, functions, ranges or steps to those claimed, whether or not such alternate, interchangeable and/or equivalent structures, functions, ranges or steps are disclosed herein, and without intending to publicly dedicate any patentable subject matter.
The present application claims the benefits of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/862,383, filed Oct. 20, 2006, of the same title, and U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/887,518, filed Jan. 31, 2007, entitled “MODULAR FINE WATER MIST FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEM USING EFFERVESCENT ATOMIZATION,” each of which are incorporated herein by this reference in there entirety.
The U.S. Government has a paid-up license in this invention and the right in limited circumstances to require the patent owner to license others on reasonable terms as provided for by the terms of Contract No. NNC06CA80C awarded by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2164153 | Friedrich | Jun 1939 | A |
| 2884075 | Poon | Apr 1959 | A |
| 3045761 | Ciarlo | Jul 1962 | A |
| 3428131 | Winslow | Feb 1969 | A |
| 3486539 | Jacuzzi | Dec 1969 | A |
| 3620299 | Wiseman, Jr. | Nov 1971 | A |
| 3692118 | Yao | Sep 1972 | A |
| 3876147 | Aris | Apr 1975 | A |
| 3938708 | Burger | Feb 1976 | A |
| 3979061 | Kircher | Sep 1976 | A |
| 4038875 | Walkotten | Aug 1977 | A |
| 4091876 | Valdatta | May 1978 | A |
| 4231430 | Byun | Nov 1980 | A |
| 4268460 | Boiarski et al. | May 1981 | A |
| 4382884 | Rohringer et al. | May 1983 | A |
| 4427074 | Wollin | Jan 1984 | A |
| 4436101 | Seatts | Mar 1984 | A |
| 4458945 | Ayler et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
| 4531588 | Brunsicke | Jul 1985 | A |
| 4560007 | Molloy et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
| 4578102 | Colmon et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
| 4655395 | Cioffi et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
| 4682729 | Doman et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
| 4734451 | Smith | Mar 1988 | A |
| 4872511 | Davis | Oct 1989 | A |
| 4889189 | Rozniecki | Dec 1989 | A |
| 4899827 | Poole | Feb 1990 | A |
| 4906164 | Jackman et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
| 4907654 | Eberhardt | Mar 1990 | A |
| 4976319 | Eberhardt et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
| 5014790 | Papavergos | May 1991 | A |
| 5042476 | Smith | Aug 1991 | A |
| 5062487 | Siria et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
| 5127554 | Loychuk | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5154234 | Carrico | Oct 1992 | A |
| 5165484 | Chaput | Nov 1992 | A |
| 5199386 | Hubbard | Apr 1993 | A |
| 5205648 | Fissenko | Apr 1993 | A |
| 5211336 | Kaidonis et al. | May 1993 | A |
| 5273191 | Meshberg | Dec 1993 | A |
| 5495893 | Roberts et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5497911 | Ellion et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5520331 | Wolfe | May 1996 | A |
| 5597044 | Roberts et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5666947 | McKay | Sep 1997 | A |
| 6098897 | Lockwood | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6189625 | Hopkins | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6267183 | Smagac | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6422320 | Mather et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6536887 | Barinaga et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
| 6637518 | Hillier et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6886640 | Duskin et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
| 6981659 | Hopkins | Jan 2006 | B1 |
| 7080793 | Borisov et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7096965 | Ozment | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 20070158467 | Knowles et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20120241535 | Carriere et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 0 155 583 | Mar 1985 | EP |
| 1 488 829 | Dec 2004 | EP |
| WO 02078788 | Oct 2002 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Beswick Engineering: 10-32 THD or Barb—CKV, http://www.beswick.com/products/product—detais.php?pid=2302, downloaded Oct. 16, 2007 (3 pages). |
| Senecal et al., “Explosion Suppression in Occupied Spaces”, Halon Options Technical Working Conference 1994, May 3-5, 1994, pp. 79-86. |
| Spring et al., “New Applications of Aqueous Agents for Fire Suppression”, Halon Alternatives Technical Working Conference 1993, May 11-13, 1993, pp. 303-308. |
| Senecal, “Explosion Protection in Occupied Spaces: The Status of Suppression and Inertion Using Halong & Its Descendants”, Fenwal Safety Systems, 1993, pp. 767-772. |
| Lefebvre et al., “Spray Characteristics of Aerated-Liquid Pressure Atomizers”, J. Propulsion, vol. 4, No. 4, Jul.-Aug. 1988, pp. 293-298. |
| Sabersky et al., Fluid Flow a First Course in Fluid Mechanics, 2nd Ed., pp. 299-303 (1971). |
| Spring et al., “Alkali Metal Salt Aerosols as Fire Extinguishants”, Halon Alternatives Technical Conference 1993, May 11-13, 1993, pp. 413-419. |
| Kibert et al., “Encapsulated Micron Aerosol Agents (EMMA)”, Halon Alternatives Technical Conference 1993, May 11-13, 1993, pp. 421-435. |
| Lewis et al., Combustion, Flames and Explosions of Gases, 3rd Ed., Chapter V, “Combustion Waves in Laminar Flow”, pp. 215-218 (1987). |
| Butz et al., “Application of Fine Water Mists to Fire Suppression”, Halon Alternatives Technical Working Conference 1992, May 12-14, 1992, pp. 347-357. |
| Cote, P.E. et al., Fire Protection Handbook, 17th Ed., Nov. 1992, pp. 4-42 through 4-67, 5-4 through 5-13, 6-184 through 6-201. |
| International Search Report for International (PCT) Patent Application No. PCT/US07/81999, mailed Aug. 1, 2008. |
| Written Opinion for International (PCT) Patent Application No. PCT/US07/81999, mailed Aug. 1, 2008. |
| Background of the Invention for the above captioned application (previously provided). |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International (PCT) Patent Application No. PCT/US07/81999, issued Apr. 22, 2009. |
| Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 08/240,271, mailed Aug. 9, 1995. |
| Notice of Allowability for U.S. Appl. No. 08/240,271, mailed Jul. 31, 1995. |
| Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 08/610,746, mailed Jul. 22, 1996. |
| Notice of Allowability for U.S. Appl. No. 08/610,746, mailed Jul. 22, 1996. |
| Kuchta, “Investigation of Fire and Explosion Accidents in the Chemical, Mining, and Fuel-Related Industries—a Manual,” U.S. Bureau of Mines Bulletin 680, Washington, DC, 1985, pp. 1-84. |
| Lefebvre, A.H., Atomization and Sprays, Hemisphere Publishing, New York, NY, 1989, pp. 136-140, 142-144, 261-264. |
| Libersky et al., “High Strain Rate Lagrangian Hydrodynamics, A Three-Dimensional SPH Code for Dynamic Material Response,” Journal of Computational Physics, Nov. 1993, vol. 109, p. 67. |
| Sher et al., “Spray Formation from Pressure Cans by Flashing,” Ind. Eng. Chem., 1977, Process Des. Dev., vol. 16(2), pp. 237-242. |
| Skaggs et al., “Technical Assessment for the SNAP Program,” Proceedings, Halon Alternatives Technical Working Conference 1992, Albuquerque, NM, May 12-14, pp. 46-57. |
| “Carbon Dioxide as a Fire Suppressant: Examining the Risks,” U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air and Radiation, Publication EPA 430-R-00-002, Feb. 2000, 54 pages. |
| Abbud-Madrid et al., “The Water-Mist Fire Suppression Experiment (Mist): Preliminary Results from the STS-107 Mission,” Seventh International Workshop on Microgravity Combustion and Chemically Reacting Systems, 2003, NASA/CP-2003-212376, pp. 281-284. |
| Butz et al., “Application of Fine Water Mists to Hydrogen Deflagrations,” Proceedings: Halon Alternatives Technnical Working Conference, May 11-13, 1993, Albuquerque, NM, pp. 345-355. |
| Mawhinney et al., “Water Mist. What is it?” NFPA Journal, 1999, vol. 93(4), available at http://www.spray-uk.com/published/NFPA899WaterMistWhatIsIt.pdf, 3 pages. |
| Mawhinney et al., “Water Mist Technology Evolves,” NFPA Journal, 1999, vol. 93(6), available at http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi—qa3737/is—199911/ai—n8869530/, 5 pages. |
| Wickham, “Status of Industry Efforts to Replace Halon Fire Extinguishing Agents,” Wickham Associates, Mar. 2002, Stathrum, New Hampshire, USA, disseminated by the USEPA, 54 pages. |
| International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US12/29955, mailed Jun. 19, 2012, 3 pages. |
| Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US12/29955, mailed Jun. 19, 2012, 5 pages. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20080128145 A1 | Jun 2008 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60862383 | Oct 2006 | US | |
| 60887518 | Jan 2007 | US |
